andhrapradesh and telangana difference of major crops

GLOBAL AREA,PRODUCTION, PRODUCTIVITY OF RICE 2012-2013

S.NO CROP AREA Million hect

PRODUCTIONMillion tonnes

PRODUCTIVITYt/ha

1. RICE 106.1 491.0 2.4

PRODUCTION INCREASED

TOP PRODUCTION OF PADDY

GLOBAL AREA,PRODUCTION,PRODUCTIVITY OF WHEAT 2012-2013

S.NO CROP AREA 000 hect

PR ODUCTION Million tonnes

PRODUCTIVITY t/ha

1. WHEAT 227,312 713.2 3.01

WORLD WHEAT PRODUCTION

GLOBAL AREA,PRODUCTIN PRODUCTIVITY OFRAGI (FINGER MILLET)

S.NO CROP AREA Million hect

PRODUCTION Million tonnes

PRODUCTIVITYKg/ha

1. RAGI 38.10 28.38

INDIAN AREA,PRODUCTION,PRODUCTIVITY OF PADDY 2012-2013

S.NO CROP AREAMillion hect

PRODUCTION Million tonnes

PRODUCTIVITYKg/ha

1. PADDY 42.41 104.4 2462

INDIAN AREA,PRODUCTION,PRODUCTIVITY OF WHEAT 2012-2013

S.NO CROP AREAMillion hect

PRODUCTION Million tonnes

PRODUCTIVITYKg/ha

1. WHEAT 29.65 92.46 3118

INDIAN AREA ,PRODUCTION,PRODUCTIVITY OF RAGI 2012-2013

S.NO CROP AREA 000 hect

PRODUCTION 000 Tonnes

PRODUCTIVITYKg/ha

1. RAGI 1,381 2040 1477

ANDHRAPRADESH

&

TELANGANA

RICE PRODUCTION IN A.P & T.G 2012-2013

S.NO STATE AREA 000 HECT

Kharif& Rabi

PRODUCTION 000 TONNES

Kharif& Rabi

PRODUCTIVITYK g/Ha

Kharif& Rabi

1. ANDHRAPRADESH

2212 6863 6214

2. TELANGANA

1417 4647 5608

WHEAT PRODUCTION IN A.P&T.G 2012-2013

S.NO STATE AREA 000 HECTARES Kharif&rabi

PRODUCTION 000 TONNES

Kharif&rabi

PRODUCTIVITY Kg/ha Kharif&rabi

1. ANDHRAPRADESH 0 0 270

2. TELANAGANA 8 9690

RAGI PRODUCTION IN A.P&T.G 2012-2013

S.NO CROP AREA Kharif&Rabi

000 hect

PR ODUCTION 000 TONNES

PR ODUCTIVITY Kg/ha

1. ANDHRAPRADESH

38 42 1773

2. TELANGANA 3 3 731

SWOT ANALYSIS AFTER BIFURCATION OF A.P & T.G

COMPARSION OF A.P& T.G

STRENGHTS• Capacity to produce seed production in large

areas

• Palm provides livelihood to significant number of families

• IT Sector is well devoloped to dessiminatetechnology

WEAKNESESS

• Spourios seed production

• Irrigation facilities are not well devoloped

• Not suited to grow water loving crops

OPPURTUNITIES

• Use IT to deliver scientific advices to farmers

• Pig farming can be taken up as livelihood to farmers

• Development of palm research centre

THREATS

• Ground water exploitation

• Lack of suitable irrigation projects

• More dependence on IT

• Real estate is increasing

SWOT

ANDHRA PRADESH

STRENGHTS

• Suitable agro climatic conditions for cotton,paddy

• cropping systems along with dairy animals

• Good network of canals and tube wells for irrigation

• Less urban biasness, predominantly being rural districts

• Receptive and innovative farmers with large acceptance of recommended inputs

WEAKNESSES

• Rainfall is highly erratic.

• Increase in incidence of pests and diseases

• Injudicious use of pesticides.

• Monoculture of cotton-wheat, rice–wheat cropping systems and their adverse

effects on natural assets

• Local labour availability scarce and costly

OPPURTUNITIES• Production and Productivity of paddy can be increased. •

• Suitable agro climatic conditions for diversification within in cotton- rice cropping rice systems.

• Mechanization for solving the problems of labour.• Improving information and communication technology for real time

extension• Establishment of commodity based and /or technology based farmers

associations.• Improving the linkages and synergies with private sector, NGOs and other

public sector organisations• Electricity consumption

THREATS

• Capital construction

• Water disputes

• Real estate boom

ORGANISATION OF ICRISAT

ICRISAT