acc objection garlock motion intervene (p0197678)
Post on 07-Apr-2018
227 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
1/18
{D0197698.1 }1DOC#463349
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN RE:
ACandS, Inc.Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Combustion Engineering, Inc.
The Flintkote Company
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.Owens Corning
US Mineral Products Company
USG Corp.W.R. Grace & Co.
Debtors.
Case No.: 02-12687 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3659)Case No.: 00-4471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10720)
Case No.: 03-10495 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3399)
Case No.: 04-11300 (Rel. Dkt. No. 5692)
Case No.: 02-10429 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10043)Case No.: 00-3837 (Rel. Dkt. No. 20980)
Case No.: 01-2471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3896)
Case No.: 01-2094 (Rel. Dkt. No. 12616)Case No.: 01-1139 (Rel. Dkt. No. 26356)
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE:
Mid-Valley, Inc.
North American Refractories Co.
Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
Debtors.
Case No.: 03-35592 (Rel. Dkt. No. 2790)
Case No.: 02-20198 (Rel. Dkt. No. 6997)
Case No.: 00-22876 (Rel. Dkt. No. 8161)
Hearing Date: March 28, 2011
Objection Deadline: March 11, 2011
OBJECTION OF THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEES OF ASBESTOS CLAIMANTS IN
THE FLINTKOTE, GRACE, NARCO AND PITTSBURGH CORNING
BANKRUPTCIES TO GARLOCKS MOTION TO INTERVENE FOR LIMITED
PURPOSE OF SEEKING ACCESS TO JUDICIAL RECORDS
The Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants in the Flintkote, Grace, NARCO and
Pittsburgh Corning bankruptcy cases (collectively, the ACCs) by and through their
undersigned counsel, hereby object to Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCs (Garlock)
proposed intervention in the twelve above-captioned Bankruptcy Cases.
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
2/18
{D0197698.1 }2
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
1. On January 10, 2011, Garlock filed a motion1 in this Court requesting access to allthe exhibits to Rule 2019 statements filed in the above-captioned cases (the Rule 2019
Exhibits). Various parties, including the ACCs, filed objections to the motion.2
Among other
things, those objections established that this Court should exercise its discretion to deny
Garlocks request because Garlocks acknowledged purposes in seeking the Exhibits were
improper and because there was cause to deny Garlock access to such information from the
twelve above-captioned cases, as shown by the relevant statutory provisions and caselaw. This
Court held a hearing on the motion on February 14, 2011. During that hearing, the Court
directed Garlock to file a formal motion to intervene in each of the Bankruptcy Cases. On
February 18, 2011, Garlock filed its motion to intervene (the Motion to Intervene),3
as well as
an amended motion authorizing access to the 2019 statements that is substantively identical to
Garlocks original motion (the Amended Motion) (and which is therefore already responded to
and refuted by the previously-filed ACC Joinder and Objection). The ACCs objections to
Garlocks intervention in the twelve Bankruptcy Cases are set forth herein.
ARGUMENT
2. Garlocks intervention for the limited purpose of pursuing access to 2019statements should be denied. Garlock does not establish that it has sufficiently shown cause to
1 Motion of Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC for Orders Authorizing Access to 2019 Statements Filed in
this Court and for Related Relief. See, e.g., In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Jan. 10,
2011) [Dkt. No. 8096].
2 The ACCs hereby incorporate by reference in its entirety, the Joinder and Objection of the Official
Committees of Asbestos Claimants in the Flintkote, Grace, NARCO and Pittsburgh Corning Bankruptcies toGarlocks Motion for Orders Authorizing Access to 2019 Statements and Related Relief, February 7, 2011 in the
above-captioned cases (the ACC Joinder and Objection). See, e.g., In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2011) [Dkt. No. 8139].
3Motion of Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC to Intervene for Limited Purpose of Seeking Access to
Judicial Records. See, e.g., In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Feb. 18, 2011) [Dkt.
No. 8161].
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
3/18
{D0197698.1 }3
intervene under Bankruptcy Rule 2018. To the contrary, Garlock is attempting to misuse
permissive intervention in the same manner it is attempting to misuse Rule 2019 to obtain
fishing-expedition discovery under the guise of vindicating public rights of access. As the ACCs
have already argued, the decision to restrict access to such materials is well within this Courts
discretion. See, e.g., In re 50-Off Stores, Inc., 213 B.R. 646, 659 (Bankr. W. D. Tex. 1997)
(following Supreme Courts guidance that bar[ring] access to judicial records is . . . best left to
the sound discretion of the trial court) (internal quotations and citations omitted). Likewise,
under Rule 2018, deciding whether to grant an interested party leave to intervene is within the
bankruptcy courts sound discretion. In re Kovalchick, Nos. 94-4256, 91-24183, 1994 WL
673105, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 1994);In re Hyde Park Pship, 73 B.R. 194, 196 (Bankr. N.D.
Ohio 1986) (the granting of permissive intervention is within the courts discretion);In re
Durango Georgia Paper Co., 336 B.R. 594, 596 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2005) ([i]ntervention is
discretionary).
A. Garlock Has Not Established Cause to Intervene
3. Bankruptcy Rule 2018(a) provides that the Court,for cause shown, may permitany interested entity to intervene generally or with respect to any specified matter. Garlock has
not shown such cause.
4. Instead, Garlock seeks to evade the cause requirement by arguing that [i]nevaluating requests to intervene under Bankruptcy Rule 2018(a), this Court has borrowed from
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)(2), governing permissive intervention. Motion to
Intervene at 8 (citingAlterra v. Healthcare Corp., 353 B.R. 66, 70-71 (Bankr. D. Del. 2006)).
ButAlterra was merely citing Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg, 23 F.3d 772, 778 (3d Cir.
1994), for the proposition that a motion to intervene is the proper procedure for a media
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
4/18
{D0197698.1 }4
company to challenge protective or confidentiality orders. It did not address under which
substantive circumstances such a challenge might be rejected, and unsurprisingly, therefore, did
not address the contours of cause under Bankruptcy Rule 2018.4
And Pansy is not a
bankruptcy case, and so of course did not address Bankruptcy Rule 2018 at all.
5. Moreover, unlike here, in Pansy andAlterra media access and public rights wereat issue, whereas this Court has already recognized that Garlock is notseeking to vindicate a
public right to access. See Hrg Tr. 11, Feb. 14, 2011 (Garlock isnt seeking these to vindicate a
public right). Instead, Garlock seeks to obtain access to the Rule 2019 Exhibits from 12
different bankruptcies in derogation of the purposes of that Rule and as an end-around proper
discovery in yet other cases.5
6. Under Bankruptcy Rule 2018, a court may deny intervention if it will result inundue delay or prejudice. See In re Lynott, 193 B.R. 882, 886 (Bankr. E.D. Wisc. 1996); 9 Alan
N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommer, Collier on Bankruptcy, 2018.04[3], at 2018-6 (16th ed. 2009)
4 To the extent thatAlterra could be read to suggest that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 applies incontested matters in bankruptcy, such a reading is refuted by the clear and governing text of the Bankruptcy Rulesthemselves. Rule 24 expressly applies only to adversary proceedings. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7024 (Rule 24
F.R.Civ.P. applies in adversary proceedings). In contested and other matters, Rule 2018(a) governs intervention.
See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2018(a) (In a case under the Code, after hearing on such notice as the Court directs and forcause shown, the court may permit any interested entity to intervene generally or with respect to any specified
matter.). See also Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7024 advisory committees note (Intervention in a case under the Code is
governed by Rule 2018 and intervention in an adversary proceeding is governed by this rule [7024].) (emphasis
added); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9014(c) (omitting Bankruptcy Rule 7024 from the list of rules that apply to contestedmatters). A motion to intervene to assert a right of access to documents is a contested matter, and thus Rule 2018
controls here. See In re Global Crossing Ltd., 295 B.R. 720, 721-22 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2003) (noting that a
proceeding regarding hearing certain evidence in camera was a contested matter.). Indeed, Garlock itself
acknowledges that it moves . . . pursuant to rule 2018(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure . . . .
Motion to Intervene at 2. And while under certain circumstances cases utilizing Rule 2018 may look to precedentapplying Rule 24, they neither could nor do eliminate the requirement of the Rule that cause be shown for such
intervention, nor eliminate this Courts ability to exercise its discretion to determine what constitutes sufficientcause in a given situation.5 Garlock attempts to evade this Courts apparent conclusion that Garlocks purposes here are improper by
making the obvious point that requests for access to documents, and the relevant legal principles, are not restricted
to media outlets. See Motion to Intervene at 8-9 & n.7. But the cases it cites are neither bankruptcy cases nor
instructive on what constitutes an improper purpose in the context of Rule 2019 Exhibits and the highly confidentialmedical information contained therein. Garlock simply ignores the relevant precedent, cited in the Joinder and
Objection at 3-7, establishing that its purposes here are improper.
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
5/18
{D0197698.1 }5
([p]ermissive intervention is warranted if the entity demonstrates that no other entity exists to
adequately protect its position and that intervention would not result in undue delay or
prejudice). Courts recognize that an intervenor causes undue delay and prejudice when it
unjustifiably wastes resources for its individual interests. See Hyde Park, 73 B.R. at 197
(denying motion to intervene because [t]he estate would be burdened by the added delay
brought by the addition of another party to the proceedings and the extra expense of another law
firms fees to pay without the benefit of a new approach to the problems in this case.); In re
ANC Rental Corp., 278 B.R. 714, 719 (Bankr. D. Del. 2002) (intervention denied where it was
the interests [of the movants] as competitors of the Debtors which they are seeking to protect by
opposing action by the Debtors which will improve the Debtors chances of successfully
reorganizing. Those interests are not in harmony with the Debtors or the creditors of these
estates and there is no reason to let Hertz and Avis use this forum to advance their individual
interests.) (emphasis added). This is another reason Garlocks attempt to intervene in the 12
cases should be denied.
7. Finally, Garlock cannot meet its burden of establishing cause for theintervention for the same reasons its underlying request for the Rule 2019 Exhibits should be
rejected, including that it seeks the documents for purposes that are improper under the
controlling law.
8. As the ACCs have previously established, Courts have supervisory power overtheir records and files and may deny access to those records and files to prevent them from being
used for an improper purpose. In re Kaiser Aluminum Corp., 327 B.R. 554, 560 (D. Del. 2005).
See also Nixon v. Warner Commcn, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978) ([e]very court has
supervisory power over its own records and files, and access has been denied where court files
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
6/18
{D0197698.1 }6
might have become a vehicle for improper purposes.); 50-Off, 213 B.R. at 659-60 (refusing to
unseal a retention hearing where, among other things, the record in this matter seems at least to
suggest an improper purpose as that term was used by the Supreme Court in theNixon case);
ACC Joinder and Objection at 3-4.9. As established by the ACC Joinder and Objection, Garlocks acknowledged
purposes in seeking the Rule 2019 Exhibits for use in other cases are improper. This Court has
already made clear that attempts to seek Rule 2019 materials for use in other cases violate the
purpose of the Rule, and are inappropriate:
[T]he purpose for filing the 2019 statements is essentially to make sure that the Courtunderstands that the parties who that the attorneys who purport to represent particular
parties actually do represent those parties and therefore have the right to participate in thesignificant events in the case. They are not there for the purpose of allowing another
party to use them in some litigation context outside the confines of this case.
Hearing Transcript at 40,In re Pittsburgh Corning Corp., No. 00-22876 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Jan.
13, 2010) (emphasis added). And the Court likewise specifically noted that giving you mass
discovery as to everybody who every law firm represents I think has no basis in law or in fact.
Id. at 44-45. As the Court noted, [t]hat is wholesale fishing. Id. at 51.
10. Other courts have agreed with this Courts conclusion. See, e.g., In re PremierIntl Holdings, Inc., 423 B.R. 58, 75 (Bankr. D. Del. 2010) (denying a motion to compel
performance of Rule 2019 obligations and stating the Official Committee, by filing its motion,
is clearly engaged in a litigation tactic to apply pressure on it[s] current adversary, the Informal
Committee of SFO Noteholders, as well as attempting to make an end run around a previous
ruling denying the Official Committees request for discovery seeking virtually the same
information); 50-Off, 213 B.R. at 659-60 ([u]nder the facts of this particular case, this Court
believes that a litigants seeking to obtain information from a retention hearing involving the
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
7/18
{D0197698.1 }7
litigants opposing counsel is an improper purpose within the meaning of that term as used in
Nixon, so that access should be denied).CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, the ACCs respectfully request that this Court refuse to allow
Garlock to intervene in the above-captioned Bankruptcy Cases.
Dated: March 11, 2011 Respectfully submitted,
CAMPBELL & LEVINE, LLC
/s/ David B. Salzman
Douglas A. Campbell (PA I.D. No. 23143)
Philip E. Milch (PA I.D. No. 53519)
David B. Salzman (PA I.D. No. 39360)1700 Grant Building
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Telephone: (412) 261-0310
Facsimile: (412) 261-5066dac@camlev.com
dbs@camlev.com
pem@camlev.com
CAMPBELL & LEVINE, LLC
/s/ Mark T. Hurford
Marla R. Eskin (DE Bar No. 2989)
Mark T. Hurford (DE Bar No. 3299)
800 N. King Street, Suite 300Wilmington, DE 19801
Telephone: (302) 426-1900
Facsimile: (302) 426-9947
meskin@camlev.commhurford@camlev.com
CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED
Peter Van N. LockwoodTrevor W. Swett
Kevin C. Maclay
One Thomas Circle, NW
Suite 1100Washington, DC 20005Telephone: (202) 862-5000
Facsimile: (202) 429-3301
E-mail: tws@capdale.com; pvnl@capdale.comkcm@capdale.com
CAPLIN & DRYSDALE, CHARTERED
Elihu Inselbuch375 Park Avenue, 35th Floor
New York, NY 10152-3500
Telephone: (212) 319-7125
Facsimile: (212) 644-6755E-mail: ei@capdale.com
Counsel for the Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
8/18
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
In re:
ACandS, Inc.
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Combustion Engineering, Inc.
The Flintkote Company
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.Owens Corning
US Mineral Products Company
USG Corp.
W.R. Grace & Co.
Debtors.
Case No.: 02-12687 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3659)
Case No.: 00-4471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10720)Case No.: 03-10495 (Rel. Dkt. No.3399)
Case No.: 04-11300 (Rel. Dkt. No.5692)
Case No.: 02-10429 (Rel. Dkt. No. 10043)Case No.: 00-3837 (Rel. Dkt. No.20980)
Case No.: 01-2471 (Rel. Dkt. No. 3896)
Case No.: 01-2094 (Rel. Dkt. No. 12616)
Case No.: 01-1139 (Rel. Dkt. No. 26356)
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re:
Mid-Valley, Inc.
North American Refractories Co.Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
Debtors.
Case No.: 03-35592 (Rel. Dkt. No. 2790)
Case No.:02-20198 (Rel. Dkt. No. 6997)Case No.:00-22876 (Rel. Dkt. No. 8161)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on March 11, 2011, I caused a copy of the Objection of The
Official Committees of Asbestos Claimants in the Flintkote, Grace, NARCO and Pittsburgh Corning
Bankruptcies to Garlocks Motion to Intervene for Limited Purpose of Seeking Access to Judicial Records
to be served upon the individuals on the attached service lists by electronic mail.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: March 11, 2011 /s/ David B. Salzman
David B. SalzmanPA ID No. 39360
CAMPBELL & LEVINE, LLC1700 Grant Building
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
T: 412-261-0310/ F: 412-261-5066
Email: dbs@camlev.com
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
9/18
Gregory W. Werkheiser, Esquire
Matthew B. Harvey, EsquireMorris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LP
1201 North Market Street, 18th Floor
P.O. Box 1347Wilmington, DE 19899-1347Tel: 302-658-9200/ Fax: 302-658-3989gwerkheiser@mnat.commharvey@mnat.com
Arthur H. Stroyd, Jr. , Esquire
Richard A. Swanson, EsquireDel Sole Cavanaugh Stroyd LLC
The Waterfront Building
200 First Avenue, Suite 300Pittsburgh, PA 15222Tel: 412-261-2393/ Fax: 412-261-2110
astroyd@dscslaw.comrswanson@dscslaw.com
Garland S. Cassada, Esquire
Richard C. Worf, Jr. , EsquireRobinson, Bradshaw & Hinson
101 North Tryon Street, Suite 1900Charlotte, NC 28246
Tel: 704-377-8317/ Fax: 704-373-3917gcassada@rbh.com
rworf@rbh.com
Daniel K. Hogan, Esquire
The Hogan Firm1311 Delaware Avenue
Wilmington, Delaware 19806Tel: 302-656-7540/ Fax: 302-656-7599
dkhogan@dkhogan.com
Peter J. Ashcroft, EsquireBernstein Law Firm, P.C.
Suite 2200 Gulf TowerPittsburgh, PA 15219
Tel: 412-456-8107/ Fax: 412-456-8255
Email: pashcroft@bernsteinlaw.com
Sander L. Esserman, EsquireDavid A. Klingler, Esquire
David J. Parsons, EsquireCliff I. Taylor, Esquire
Stutzman, Bromberg, Esserman & Plifka
2323 Bryan Street, Suite 2200Dallas, Texas 75201Tel: 214-969-4900/ Fax: 214-969-4999
Esserman@sbep-law.comKlingler@sbep-law.com
parsons@sbep-law.comtaylor@sbep-law.com
Natalie D. Ramsey, Esquire
Laurie A. Krepto, EsquireMontgomery, Mccracken,
Walker & Rhoads, LLP123 S. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19109Tel: 215-772-1500/ Fax: 215-772-7620
nramsey@mmwr.comlkrepto@mmwr.com
Ellen C. Brotman, Esquire
Montgomery, McCracken,Walker & Rhoads, LLP
123 South Broad StreetAvenue of the Arts
Philadelphia, PA 19109ebrotman@mmwr.com
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
10/18
Joseph F. Rice, EsquireJohn Baden, Esquire
Motley Rice LLC28 Bridgeside Blvd.
Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464
Tel: 843-216-9000/ Fax: 843-216- 9430jrice@motleyrice.comjbaden@motleyrice.com
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
11/18
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re:
PITTSBURGH CORNING
CORPORATION,
Debtor.
Chapter 11
Case No. 00-22876-JKF
SERVICE LIST EFFECTIVE 9/8/2010
Counsel to Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Rosalie J. Bell, EsquirePittsburgh Corning Corporation800 Presque Isle DrivePittsburgh, PA 15239-2779
Tel: 724-733-3838/ Fax: 724-387-3809Email: rose_bell@pghcorning.com
David Ziegler, Esquire
Reed Smith LLPReed Smith Center
225 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1200Pittsburgh, PA 15222
Tel: 412-288-3026/ Fax: 412-288-3063Email: dziegler@reedsmith.com
James J. Restivo, Jr., EsquireReed Smith LLPReed Smith Center225 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222Tel: 412-288-3122/ Fax: 412-288-3063
Email: jrestivo@reedsmith.com
Douglas E. Cameron, EsquireReed Smith LLP
Reed Smith Center225 Fifth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222Tel: 412-288-4104/ Fax: 412-288-3063
Email: dcameron@reedsmith.com
Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos Creditors
Elihu Inselbuch, EsquireCaplin & Drysdale, Chartered
375 Park Avenue, 35th
FloorNew York, NY 10152-3500
Tel: 212-319-7125/ Fax: 1-212-644-6755
Email: ei@capdale.com
Peter Van N. Lockwood, Esquire
Caplin & Drysdale, CharteredOne Thomas Circle N.W.
Washington, DC 20005Tel: 202-862-5000/ Fax: 1-202-429-3301
Email: pvnl@capdale.com
Douglas A. Campbell, EsquireEmail: dac@camlev.com
Philip E. Milch, EsquireEmail: pem@camlev.com
Campbell & Levine, LLC
1700 Grant BuildingPittsburgh, PA 15219Tel: 412-261-0310/ Fax: 412-261-5066
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
12/18
Counsel to Official Committee of Trade Creditors
David W. Lampl, EsquireLeech, Tishman, Fuscaldo & Lampl, LLC
Citizens Bank Building, 30th
Floor525 William Penn Place
Pittsburgh, PA 15219Tel: 412-261-1600/ Fax: 412-227-5551
Email: dlampl@leechtishman.com
Counsel to Shareholders
Counsel to PPG Industries, Inc.
Peter J. Kalis, EsquireEmail: peter.kalis@klgates.com
David A. Murdoch, EsquireEmail: david.murdoch@klgates.com
Neal R. Brendel, Esquire
Email: neal.brendel@klgates.comDavid F. McGonigle, EsquireEmail: david.mcgonigle@klgates.com
K&L Gates, LLP210 Sixth Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222Tel: 412-355-6500/ Fax: 412-355-6501
Counsel to Corning Incorporated
Kimberly Luff Wakim, EsquireThorp Reed & Armstrong
One Oxford Centre, 14
th
Floor301 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15219Tel: 412-394-7711/ Fax: 412-394-2555
Email: kwakim@thorpreed.com
Cheryl A. Heller, EsquireWard Greenberg Heller & Reidy LLP
300 State StreetRochester, NY 14614
Tel: 585-454-0719/ Fax: 585-231-1905Email: cheller@wardgreenberg.com
Counsel to PNC Bank Office of the United States Trustee
Brad Erens, Esquire
Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue77 West Wacker
Chicago, IL 60601
Tel: 312-269-4050/ Fax: 1-312-782-8585Email: bberens@jonesday.com
Joseph M. Fornari, Jr., Esquire
970 Liberty Center1001 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
Tel: 412-644-4756/ Fax: 412-644-4785Email: Joseph.M.Fornari@USDOJ.GOV
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
13/18
Legal Representative for Counsel to Legal Representative
Future Claimants for Future Claimants
Mr. Lawrence Fitzpatrick
100 American Metro Blvd.Suite 108
Hamilton, NJ 08619Tel: 609-219-8862/ Fax: 609-620-1466
Email: lfitzpatrick@theccr.com
Joel M. Helmrich, Esquire
Dinsmore & Shohl, LLPOne Oxford Centre
301 Grant Street; Suite 2800Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Tel: 412-288-5880/ Fax: 412-281-5055Email: joel.helmrich@dinslaw.com
James L. Patton Jr., EsquireEmail: jpatton@ycst.com
Edwin J. Harron, EsquireEmail: eharron@ycst.com
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLPThe Brandywine Building, 17
thFloor
1000 West Street
Wilmington, DE 19801Tel: 302-571-6600/ Fax: 302-571-1253
Others
C. Sanders McNew, Esquire
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.100 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038Tel: 212-558-5500/ Fax: 1-212-344-5461
Email: sandersm@aol.com
Robert Knights, Esquire
Gertler, Gertler, Vincent & Plotkin127-128 Carondelet Street
New Orleans, LA 70130Tel: 504-581-6411/ Fax: 1-504-581-6568
Email: rknights@ggvplaw.com
R. Kenneth Willman, Esquire
Willman & ArnoldOne Corporate Center
5500 Corporate Drive, STE 150Pittsburgh, PA 15237
T: 412-366-3333/ F: 412-366-3462Email: kwillman@willmanlaw.com
Thomas M. Crawford, Esquire
Litchfield Cavo303 West Madison Street, Suite 200
Chicago, IL 60606T: 312-781-6677/ F: 1-312-781-6630
Email: Crawford@litchfieldcavo.com
Jeffrey J. Leech, EsquireMichael Shiner, Esquire
Tucker Arensberg, P.C.1500 One PPG Place
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
T: 412-594-5524/ F: 412-594-5619Email: jleech@tuckerlaw.comEmail: mshiner@tuckerlaw.com
Robert A. Simon, EsquireBarlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
3815 Lisbon StreetFort Worth, TX 76107
Tel: 817-731-4500/ Fax: 817-731-6200
Counsel to the DurhamsEmail: rsimon@bgsfirm.com
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
14/18
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
In re:
NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES
COMPANY, et al.,
Debtors.
Chapter 11
Case No. 02-20198-JKF
OFFICIAL SERVICE LIST EFFECTIVE 9/8/2010
Office of the U.S. Trustee
Attn: Kathy Robb, EsquireLiberty Center, Suite 970
1001 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
T: 412-644-4752/ F: 412-644-4785
Kathleen.robb@usdoj.gov
Robert P. Simons, Esquire
Reed Smith LLP225 Fifth Avenue, STE 2800
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
T: 412-288-7294/ F: 412-288-3063
Counsel to Debtors
rsimons@reedsmith.com
Elihu Inselbuch, Esquire
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
375 Park Avenue, 35th Floor
New York, NY 10152-3500
T: 212-319-7125/ F: 212-644-6755Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos
Creditors
ei@capdale.com
Peter Van N. Lockwood, Esquire
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
One Thomas Circle, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005-5802
T: 202-862-5000/ F: 202-429-3301Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos
Creditors
pvnl@capdale.com
Philip E. Milch, Esquire
Campbell & Levine, LLC
1700 Grant Building
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
T: 412-261-0310/ F: 412-261-5066
Counsel to Official Committee of Asbestos
Creditors
pem@camlev.com
Robert G. Sable, Esquire
Sally Edison, Esquire
McGuire Woods, LLP
Dominion Tower, 23rd Floor
625 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
T: 412-667-7936/ F: 412-667-6050
Counsel to Official Committee of UnsecuredTrade Creditors
sedison@mcquirewoods.com
rsable@mcguirewoods.com
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
15/18
Jon A. Allegretti, Esquire
North American Refractories Company
Cherrington Corporate Center
400 Fairway Drive
Moon Township, PA 15108
T: 412-375-6674F: 412-375-6957
jallegretti@capdale.com
Daniel M. Lewis, Esquire
Arnold & Porter
555 12th Street NW
Washington, DC 20004-1206
Tel. 202-942-5661
Fax. 202-942-5999Counsel to Honeywell Internationaldaniel_lewis@aporter.com
Peter J. Sacripanti, EsquireStephen B. Selbst EsquireMcDermott, Will & Emery50 Rockefeller PlazaNew York NY 10020Tel: 212 547 5583Fax: 1-212-547-5444Counsel to Honeywell Internationalpsacripanti@mwe.com
sselbst@mwe.com
Mr. Lawrence Fitzpatrick100 American Metro Blvd.Suite 108Hamilton, NJ 08619Tel: 609-219-8862Fax: 609-620-1466lfitzpatrick@theccr.comLegal Representative for Future Claimants
Joel M. Helmrich, Esquire
Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP
One Oxford Centre, Suite 2800
301 Grant StreetPittsburgh, PA 15219Tel: 412-288-5880Fax:412-281-5055Counsel to the Legal Representative for FutureClaimantsjoel.helmrich@dinslaw.com
James L. Patton Jr., EsquireEdwin J. Harron, EsquireYoung Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLPThe Brandywine Building, 17
thFloor
1000 West StreetWilmington, DE 19801Tel: 302-571-6600Fax: 302-571-1253Counsel to the Legal Representative for FutureClaimantsjpatton@ycst.comeharron@ycst.com
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
16/18
In re:MID-VALLEY, INC., et ai.,
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jointly Administered atCase No. 03-35592 JKFChapter 11
Debtors.
))))))
OFFICIAL SERVICE LIST EFFECTIVE 01/06/05
Albert O. CornelisonExecutive Vice President &General CounselHalliburton Company1401 McKinney, Suite 2400Houston, TX 77010Ph: 713.759.2620Fax: 713.759.2622Email: bert.comelison@halliburton.com
Jeffrey N. Rich, EsquireK&L Gates LL P599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030Ph: 212.536.4097Fax: 212.536.3901Email: jeff.rich@k1gates.com
Frank H. Griffm, ill, EsquireGollatz, Griffm & EwingFour Penn Center, Suite 2001600 John F. Kennedy BoulevardPhiladelphia, PA 19103-2803Ph: 215.563.9400Fax: 215.665.9988Email: fgriffin @ggelaw.com
Bruce StanskiSenior Vice President and CFOKellogg Brown & Root4100 Clinton DriveHouston, TX 77020Ph: 713.753.4908Fax: 713.753.2017Email: bruce.stanski@halliburton.com
Counsel to Mid-Valley, Inc., et aleMichael G. Zanic, EsquireK&L Gates LLPHenry W. Oliver Building535 Smithfield StreetPittsburgh, PA 15222Ph: 412.355.6219Fax: 412.355.6501Email: michael.zanic@k1gates.com
Accountants & Financial Consultants to Mid-Valley, Inc . et aleThomas D. BibbyMesirow Financial Consulting, LLC717 North Harwood StreetSuite 3100Dallas, TX 75201Ph: 214.840.2479Fax: 214.840.2180Email: tbibby@mesirowfinancial.com
PI-I088388 vI
Dr. Francine K. RabinovitzHamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler, Inc.26384 Carmel Rancho Lane, Suite 202Carmel, CA 93923Ph: 831.626.1350Fax: 831.626.1351Email: frabinov@aol.com
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
17/18
Counsel to Committee of Asbestos CreditorsPeter Van N. Lockwood, EsquireCaplin & Drysdale, CharteredOne Thomas Circle N.W.Washington, DC 20005Ph: 202.862.5000Fax: 202.429.3301Email: pvnl@capdale.comPhilip E. Milch, EsquireCampbell & Levine, LLC1700 Grant BuildingPittsburgh, PA 15219Ph: 412.261.0310Fax: 412.261.5066Email: pem@camlev.com
Jack L. Kinzie, EsquireMichael C. Li, EsquireBaker Botts LLP2001 Ross AvenueDallas, TX 75201Ph: 214.953.6500Fax: 214.953.6503Email: jack.kinzie@bakerbotts.comEmail: michae1.li@bakerbotts.comEmail: bankruptcydallas@bakerbotts.com
Office of the U.S. Trustee
Joseph Sisca, EsquireOffice of the U.S. Trustee970 Liberty Center1001 Liberty AvenuePittsburgh, PA 15222Ph: 412.644.4756Fax: 412.644.4785Email: joseph.s.sisca@usdoj.gov
Elihu Inselbuch, EsquireCaplin & Drysdale, Chartered375 Park Avenue, 35th FloorNew York, NY 10152-3500Ph: 212.319.7125Fax: 212.644.6755Email: ei@capdale.com
Counsel to Halliburton and RESITony M. Davis, EsquireBaker Botts LLPOne Shell Plaza910 LouisianaHouston, TX 77002-4995Ph: 713.229.1234Fax: 713.229.1522Email: tony.davis@bakerbotts.com
Counsel to Legal Representativefor Future Claimants
James L. Patton Jr., EsquireEdwin J. Harron, EsquireYoung Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLPThe Brandywine Building, 17 th Floor1000 West StreetWilmington, DE 19801Ph: 302.571.6600Fax: 302.571.1253Email: ipatton@ycst.comEmail: eharron@ycst.comJoel M. Helmrich, EsquireDinsmore & Shohl LLPOne Oxford Centre301 Grant Street, Suite 2800Pittsburgh, PA 15219Tel: 412-288-5880Fax: 412-281-5055Email: joel.helmrich@dinslaw.com
2
-
8/3/2019 Acc Objection Garlock Motion Intervene (p0197678)
18/18
John W. Burns. EsquireDickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Two PPG Place - Suite 400Pittsburgh, PA 15222Ph: 412.392.5413Fax: 412.392.5367Email: burnsj@dmclaw.com
Steven P. Rice, EsquireCrowell & Moring LLP3 Park Plaza, 20th FloorIrvine, CA 92614-8505Ph: 949.263.8400Fax: 949.263.8414Email: srice@crowell.com
Philip D. Anker. EsquireWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & DOff LLP399 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10022Ph: 212.230.8800Fax: 212.230.8888Email: philip.anker@wilmerhale.com
Katherine Worthman, EsquireJames A. Shepherd, EsquireWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & DOff LLP2445 M. Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20037Ph: 202.663.6000Fax: 202.663.6363Email: katherine.worthman@wilmerhale.comEmail: james.shepherd@wilmerhale.comDennis R. Very, EsquirePepper Hamilton LLP500 Grant Street, 50 th FloorPittsburgh, PA 15219-2502Ph: 412.454.5000Fax: 412.281.0717Email: veryd@pepperlaw.com
Mark D. Plevin, EsquireClifton S. Elgarten, EsquireFrederick W. Claybrook, Jr., EsquireLeslie A. Epley, EsquireJames T. Hubler. EsquireCrowell & Moring LLP1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20004-2595Ph: 202.624.2500Fax: 202.628.5116Email: mplevin@crowell.comEmail: celgarten@crowell.comEmail: rclaybrook@crowell.comEmail: lepley@crowell.comEmail: jhubler@crowell.comPaul R. Koepff, EsquireTancred V. Schiavoni, EsquireO'Melveny & Myers LLPTimes Square Tower7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036Ph: 212.326.2000Fax: 212.326.2061Email: pkoepff@omm.comEmail: tschiavoni@omm.comDuane Morse, EsquireNancy Manzer, EsquireLinda Chanow, EsquireWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & DOff LLP1600 Tysons Boulevard10 th FloorTysons Comer, VA 22102Ph: 703.251.9700Fax: 703.251.9797Email: duane.morse@wilmerhale.comEmail: nancy.manzer@wilmerhale.comEmail: linda.chanow@wilmerhale.comVinita K. Sinha, EsquireDKW Law Group LLC58th Floor, US Steel Tower600 Grant StreetPittsburgh, PA 15219Ph: 412.355.2600Fax: 412.355.2609Email: vsinha@dkwlaw.com
Thomas H. Grace, EsquireW. Steven Bryant, EsquireLocke Liddell & Sapp LLP3400 Chase Tower, 6600 Travis StreetHouston, TX 77002-3095Ph: 713.226.1200Fax: 713.223.3717Email: tgrace@lockeliddell.comEmail: sbryant@lockeliddell.com
3
top related