american society for quality - employee engagement presentation

37
Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved. American Society for Quality (ASQ) – Ottawa Chapter April 23, 2014

Upload: talentmap

Post on 10-May-2015

269 views

Category:

Business


9 download

DESCRIPTION

Employee Engagement : Moving the Needle on Quality This lecture is designed to demonstrate how engaged employees positively impact quality. Sean will expand on how employees become engaged and stay engaged. He will use statistics to identify how engaged employees impact quality results and processes. All audience members will be equipped with talent solutions that they can immediately implement in their workplace to impact the organization’s human capital results and their quality-related bottom line performance. Session Description: TalentMap’s proven Best Practices are shared and elaborated on. What has TalentMap heard employees/employers from hundreds of corporations share with us? What do they need and want to become and stay engaged employees? How have the engagement elements been impacted by quality programs and implementation plans put in place by corporations? These questions and many more are addressed when Sean Fitzpatrick shares ideas, approaches and business practices on employee engagement and how it impacts corporate culture and quality. We will address: -Statistics from TalentMap’s extensive database that identify how engaged employees improve on quality -What TalentMap has learned and heard from employees when surveying their corporate culture that impacts quality -How to implement action plans with accountabilities from an engagement survey Once you have surveyed identify how you work on making the changes that will impact your corporate engagement levels: -what are the quick wins - plan for the strategic gains - looking at impact vs. cost - how you deliver what you have promised - importance of measuring your programs - who should be involved in the planning,delivery and implementation Our Client will then address what they have experienced, learned and implemented on during and after their Employee Engagement survey. Once you have all the data and information how do you set priorities, how do you roll them out, who implements and how do you measure success, how you get the buy-in in a unionized environment?

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

American Society for Quality (ASQ) – Ottawa Chapter April 23, 2014

Page 2: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Main Header

Text

2

Page 3: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Today’s Agenda 3

Page 4: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Today’s Agenda 4

23% to 67% expect meaningful work

Page 5: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Today’s Agenda 5

Page 6: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Why? 6

Page 7: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

7

Page 8: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Today’s Agenda 8

1 in 5

Page 9: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Human Capital – Top CEO Challenge Globally for 20149

http://www.ft.com

Page 10: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Human Capital #2 – Top CEO Challenge USA for 201410

Page 11: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Satisfaction is Not the Same as Engagement 11

ENGAGED EMPLOYEES

feel a sense of: Focus Urgency Intensity

Enthusiasm Persistence Adaptability

The focus is ondesiring to “give”

Page 12: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

TalentMap’s Focus 12

Heart Hands

Logical Emotional Behavioural

Head

Employee engagement is a heightened emotional and intellectual connection that an employee has for his/her job, organization, manager, or

coworkers that, in turn, influences him/her to apply additional

discretionary effort to his/her work.

Career & Financial Goals Achieved

Values Align with Peers,Management and Leaders

DiscretionaryEffort

Page 13: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Engagement Matters 13

Revenue

Customer Satisfaction

Safety

Productivity

Attendance

Retention

Public Confidence

Page 14: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Engagement Matters – The Magic 14

University of Canberra: a job that we hate is as bad for our health sometime worse than not having a job at all

University College of London 2011 not recognized at work have more heart disease

Whitehall study: Sr. Exec live longer than lower level employees, not a small discrepancy

Boston College child’s sense of well being effected by parents that enjoy their work

Page 15: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Why No/Limited Executive Buy In? 15

1. Don’t think it can be measured.

3. Don’t get presented with a clear business case for engagement

2. Don’t believe its all that important.

Page 16: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

It Absolutely Can Be Measured Through Proxy 16

+/- Client A2012*

+/- TM Benchmark

Overall Engagement

I am proud to tell others I work for my organization.

I am optimistic about the future of my organization.

My organization inspires me to do my best work.

I would recommend my my organization to a friend as a great place to work.

My job provides me with a sense of personal accomplishment.

I can see a clear link between my work and my organization's long-term objectives.

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

3

1

4

4

1

2

5

13

6

9

17

15

13

18

84

93

88

79

84

84

77

Unfavourable Neutral Favourable

% Frequency

* Number indicates % Favourable score

+1 +4

+2 +4

+8 +8

-2 +2

+5 +10

-3 -1

-2 +1

Not perfect but extremely valuable

Data is rounded to the nearest whole number

Page 17: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Survey Design 17

#2 Innovation

#1 Teamwork

#3 Professional Growth

EmployeeEngagement

EmployeeEngagement

EmployeeEngagement

Innovation Customer Focus

Work/life Balance

Information &Communications

Teamwork

Compensation WorkEnvironment

Performance Feedback

Professional Growth

Immediate Management Organizational Vision Senior Leadership

Dependent Variable

Independent Variables

Page 18: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

And Improved Over Time 18

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201256%

58%

60%

62%

64%

66%

68%

70%

72%

74%

76%

78%

80%

% F

av

ou

rab

le

Engagement Score of 500 person Technology Company

Page 19: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Driver #1 – Innovation/Quality Improvement

Overall Innovation

Failure is viewed as an opportunity for learning and improvement.

We are committed to doing high quality work.

We systematically adopt new and improved ways to work.

Learning is an important objective in our day-to-day work.

There is a culture of innovation at this organization.

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

18

15

7

23

16

29

24

29

11

23

22

33

59

56

83

54

62

38

Unfavourable Neutral Favourable

% Frequency

19

(67)

-5

-2

-6

-11

-20

Data is rounded to the nearest whole number+/- TM Benchmark

Page 20: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

20Driver #1 - Innovation: Comments

191 respondents selected a theme for this comment

How could your organization improve innovation?

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

41% 40% 39%32%

28%

19%

6%

XYX Inc. Benchmark

% F

req

ue

nc

y

Page 21: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Why No/Limited Executive Buy In? 21

1. Don’t think it can be measured.

3. Don’t get presented with a clear business case for engagement

2. Don’t believe its all that important.

Page 22: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Talk To Him/Her In Their Terms 22

1. Use Data – statistics2. Link to the business objectives3. Competitors?4. Link to personal goals & objectives5. Leave a legacy

Page 23: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Use Statistics 23

Chemotherapy and breast cancer survival: r = .03 Antibiotics and the cure for pediatric ear pain: r = .08 Smoking and incidence of lung cancer within 25 years: r = .08 Effect of ibuprofen on pain reduction: r = .14 Alcohol and aggressive behavior: r = .23 Sleeping pills and improvement in insomnia: r = .30 Viagra and improved male sexual functioning: r = .38 Employee engagement and customer satisfaction: r = .43

Page 24: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

And More Statistics 24

SERVICE Employees’ customer service productivity scores and their employee engagement scores

had a correlation of .51. (Source: Linking People Measures to Strategy. The Conference Board)

Companies with high employee engagement scores had twice the customer loyalty (repeat purchases, recommendations to friends) than companies with average employee engagement levels. (Source: Are They Really ‘On the Job’?, Pont)

In a major department store chain, customers scored higher in customer engagement measures when they were serviced in departments with employees who had high levels of employee engagement. (Source: Getting Engaged, Bates)

Teams classified as “high performance zone for engagement” had a 37% net promoter score (NPS) versus 10% NPS for teams “outside of high performance zone for engagement.” (Source: Aon Hewitt European Manager Survey 2011. Aon Hewitt)

Morrison Management Specialists increased client satisfaction by 1 percentage point for every 2 percentage point increase in employee engagement (Source: Engagement Leads to Growth at Morrison, Talent Management)

SALES Fabick CAT improved “percent of industry net sales” by 300% (Source: A Caterpillar

Dealer Unearths Employee Engagement, Gallup Business Journal)

Page 25: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

25

QUALITY Unnamed Fortune 100 manufacturing company reduced quality errors from 5,658

parts per million to 52 parts per million. (Source: Employee Engagement: The Key To Realizing Competitive Advantage, Development Dimensions International)

SAFETYMolsonCoors, it was found that engaged employees were five times less likely than non-engaged employees to have a safety incident and seven times less likely to have a lost-time safety incident. (Source: Effective practice guidelines: Employee engagement and commitment. SHRM)

RETENTION …REVENUE, PROFIT AND STOCK RETURNS…ROLE OF FRONT-LINE MANAGERS…

And More Statistics

Page 26: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Link Engagement to the Business 26

Internal Service Quality

EmployeeEngagement

EmployeeRetention

EmployeeProductivity

ExternalServiceValue

CustomerSatisfaction

CustomerLoyalty

RevenueGrowth

Profitability

Service concept: results for customers

Service designed and delivered to meet targeted customers’ needs

RetentionRepeat business

Referral

EmployeeEngagement

Innovation Customer Focus

Information & Communicatio

nTeamworkWork/life

Balance

Performance Feedback

Professional Growth

Work EnvironmentCompensation

Senior LeadershipOrganizational VisionImmediate Management

Page 27: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

A multi-year intervention in an American chemical manufacturing plant • 91% improvement in employee engagement• 167% increase in production quality and an • 83% decrease in reportable safety incidents.

 “Leaders Don’t Motivate – They Create the

Conditions for Self-Motivation.”

Show What Competitors Do

Page 28: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Get Engagement on his/her Goals/Objectives

Page 29: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

29Help Them Leave a Legacy

Page 30: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

www.talentmap.com

30What are Stay Interviews

•Definition: • A “stay interview” is a periodic one-on-one structured discussion between a manager and an employee that identifies and then reinforces the factors that drives an employees retention and engagement.

Page 31: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

www.talentmap.com

31Structure of Stay Interviews

A)   Introductory questions• Starting the conversation

B) Identify the factors that make the employee want to stay and engage

• Positive stay factors • Reasons you give to others • “Best work of your life” factors • “Job impact” factors • Fully used factors • Are you listened to and valued

Page 32: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

www.talentmap.com

32Structure of Stay Interviews (cont.)

C) Identify the positive actions related to retention that might further increase engagement.

• Better managed/manage differently?• More positive elements and fewer less desirable ones• Dream job?• Where would you like to be X years?• Challenge factors• How do you like to be Recognition? • Exposure to executive?• Learning, growth, and leadership

Page 33: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

www.talentmap.com

33Structure of Stay Interviews (cont.)

D) Identify the possible “triggers” that may cause the employee to consider leaving

• Identify possible retention triggers • Recent frustrations• Others made you think • Past triggers

Page 34: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

34Many Benefits of Why-do-You-Stay? Interviews

• They stimulate the employee

• Personalized

• They typically limited to key employees

• They include actions

• Lower employee emotions

• Low time pressure on the manager

• A focus on the positive

• They don’t require a lot of training

• They are inexpensive

Page 35: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

TalentMap In-Action 35

Free Monthly Webinars Next one April 24th 12:00 EST TalentMap on “Engaging Your Employees with Your Organizational Vision”

To Register: www.talentmap.com/events

Fall Events: Sept 10-12 Ontario Municipal HR Association (OMHRA) Alliston, ON Nov 3-5 HealthAchieve Conference Toronto Nov 17-18 Canada Top 100 Employees Conference Vancouver

To Register: www.talentmap.com/events

Free Resources www.talentmap.com/resources Subscribe to our newsletter Coming months

Whitepapers (Context Specific Engagement) Financial, Engineering &Technology, Healthcare, Regulatory/Government, NGO

Video’s 1-2 min videos on topics Employee Engagement checklist, FAQs & Best Practices

@talentmap

Page 36: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

36

[email protected] 613-248-3417 x 500

???Questions!

Page 37: American Society for Quality - Employee Engagement Presentation

Copyright©2014, Talent Map. All rights reserved.

Today’s Agenda 37