after the referendum inter-governmental relations in the uk in the event of a no vote
DESCRIPTION
After the Referendum Inter-governmental relations in the UK in the event of a NO vote. Dr Nicola McEwen, University of Edinburgh Associate Director ESRC Scottish Centre on Constitutional Change. Defining IGR. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
After the Referendum
Inter-governmental relations in the UK in the event of a NO vote
Dr Nicola McEwen, University of Edinburgh
Associate DirectorESRC Scottish Centre on Constitutional Change
‘the working connections that tie central governments to those constituent units that enjoy measures of independent and interdependent political power, governmental control and decision-making’ (Agranoff, 2004: 26)
Defining IGR
Consequence of divisionof constitutional competences Shared powers/functions ‘spillover effects’
Nature of policy problems & integrated approachto resolving them EG ‘poverty’, ‘economic growth’, ‘security’, etc
Intergovernmental finance – vertical fiscal imbalance
Europeanisation EU policy-making/shaping; implementing EU directives
Why IGR?
Constitutional settlement and structure of government
Financial climatePolitical/legal culture and role of the courtsParty political composition of governmentPolicy sphere:
policy convergence/divergence; policy priorities extent of Europeanisation; inter-dependence
‘the human element’ (Wright) – the activities, attitudes, personalities and perceptions of those individuals holding office
Factors Shaping IGR
Formal machinery of IGR Joint Minister Committee – plenary and domestic British-Irish Council
BUT - emphasis on informality – concordats, Memorandum of Understanding > low level of ‘institutionalisation’
Central co-ordination role of civil service as ‘oil and glue’
Comparative low level of judicialization in UK politics > minimal role for the courts
Lack of intra-government centralisation of IGR, inc. through territorial offices of state
IGR in the UK - IPROCESSES
Constitutional asymmetries across the UK > hierarchical IGR – dominance of central govt bilateral IGR – minimal scope for multi-lateral
collaborationPre 2007 - benign fiscal climate & party congruence
facilitated co-operation/absence of conflict 2007-2010 – political opposition and ‘intra-territorial’
competition diminished trust and access2010 – ‘respect agenda’ partially eroded by:
austerity BIG constitutional politics
IGR in the UK – IIDYNAMICS
Proposals for Changes to IGR – I
Lib Dems
Home Rule and Community Rule Commission gradual process towards ‘home rule all round’ in a ‘federal union’ enshrine principle of ‘mutual respect’ as a constitutional
obligation eventual integration of territorial ministries into a dept for
constitutional affairs, and for the nations and regions creation of third category of powers – ‘partnership powers’ - to
ensure joint working between governments (e.g. energy, strategic welfare policy, cross-border transport, marine, skills & employment)
legal obligation to consult, but with ‘power of initiation’ in partnership policies
Enhanced role for the Supreme Court in formal dispute resolution
Devolution Commissioninterim reportEmphasis on central-local relations within ScotlandConstitutional rights for local governmentHint at recommendation for more formality:“No formal machinery for inter-governmental relations will ever prevent disagreements: disagreement is the very stuff of politics. Nevertheless, in our view, the mechanisms for inter-governmental relations need to be further developed at all levels. We welcome further thoughts from interested groups and stakeholders on this issue and on how the necessary improvements might be achieved.”
Calman commission: mutual respect between as ‘guiding principle’ enhanced role and breadth of JMC, inc formal co-ordination among officials strengthened co-operation between Scot Parl & Westminster, inc committees,
with enhanced parliamentary scrutiny of IGR
Proposals for Changes to IGR – II
Labour Party
Prospects for Post Referendum IGR
PROCESS Scotland Act 2012 > some
changes: e.g. Joint Exchequer
Committee – ongoing role? Continuity of JMCs Enhanced role for BIC
unlikely Multi-lateral approach to
constitutional reform? Prevalence of bilateralism
more likely
DYNAMICS Depends on result:
strong YES vote > enhanced influence
weak YES vote > lost leverage Depends on campaign conduct
lasting impact on trust and inter-personal relationships?
Depends on response: Prevalence of goodwill and mutual
respect? Scotland off radar?
Effects of continued austerity