advocacy plan and application to framework

26
Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework Prepared by: Stephen Rabent, Yan Qu, Faisal Hassan, and Shannon Kennedy

Upload: faisal-hassan

Post on 27-Jan-2017

161 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

Prepared by: Stephen Rabent, Yan Qu, Faisal Hassan, and Shannon Kennedy

Page 2: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

1

Table of Contents

Executive Summary 2 Outlining a Policy Goal 3 Developing an Advocacy Plan 5

Component One: Coalition Building for Political Pressure 6

Component Two: Building Strategic Relationships 10

Component Three: Social Media 14 Application of the Advocacy Strategy Framework 17 Application of Impact Evaluation 21 References 25

Page 3: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

2

Executive Summary

The following report consists of four sections; (1) An overview of the policy goal for the expansion of a decentralized waste system, (2) An Advocacy Plan consisting of three main components, (3) The application of the Strategic Advocacy Framework to this Advocacy Plan, and (4) A tool to begin tracking social media. Within the Advocacy Plan, the first component explains the purpose and importance of applying political pressure through coalition forming with likeminded NGOs in Delhi. The second component demonstrates how relationship building within the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) can help leverage their policymaking abilities to help Chintan reach their sustainable development goals. The third component provides the beginning of a social media strategy that Chintan can further expand on to meet their growing needs and mission. Each component is as detailed as possible but only the start. It is essential that you utilize these strategies while also considering how you can further modify the components to serve future campaigns and strategies. We recommend you do this through the Strategic Advocacy Framework and social media tracking tool within this report, both of which allow for detailed tracking of goals, interim outcomes, and activities as they relate to your overall mission.

Summary of Recommendations and Action Items:

1) Identify likeminded NGOs and form strategic bonds Chintan already has a good relationship with several local NGOs in New Delhi, however there are many organizations in both the public and private sectors that could mutually benefit from sustainable policy changes. You must formally identify these organizations and lay out what collective strategies can be used to sway policymaking. Action Item: Create a table that lists each organization, contact information, and why they are important to form a coalition with. Use this information to host regular informal roundtable discussions that will bring together a diverse range of actors to illustrate why change is necessary.

2) Create Strategic Relationships within the local government Although it is a tedious process to form meaningful relationships within the government, it is important to actually identify important actors and why they should be contacted. Action Item: Create a networking map and table that organizes who Chintan should be talking to and what a mutual partnership would look like. These meetings can be placed in the framework, which allows you to actually track their effectiveness.

3) Extend Social Media Strategy Chintan already has a good social media presence, however it could be more formally organized and extended to include more platforms that reach a diverse set of audiences. Action Item: Utilize an excel sheet to plan social media ahead of time then implement the plan weekly through the website, Hootsuite. Additionally, you can track your social media presence using the provided tools so that results can be circulated internally as well as externally.

Page 4: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

Outlining the Policy Goal

Introduction

Chintan currently facilitates interactions between Safai Sena, an organization of waste-pickers, and waste generators in both the public and private sector. Formally registered in 2009, Safai Sena advocates for waste-picker livelihoods and their inclusion into the formal sector where their work can be recognized for its positive environmental and social impact. They have over 10,000 members and operate in three states in Northern India. Chintan partners with Safai Sena to help them interact and secure contracts with governmental entities and residential areas to engage in waste collection and management, formalizing their place in the waste management sector.

Policy Goal

Chintan is interested in expanding a decentralized, sustainable, zero-waste model that has been successfully operated by Safai Sena throughout New Delhi. The proposed campaign will focus on building a coalition of support for the model and ultimately advocating for its inclusion as part of a decentralized waste management policy in New Delhi.

Zero-Waste Site Basics

Safai Sena currently operates seven zero-waste sites throughout New Delhi. One is located at a municipal railway station while the six others spread across the city. Three factors mainly dictate where these sites are located: (1) If land is available to house a separation site (2) If the location is in an area where waste-pickers operate, and (3) If they are able to secure a contract to collect the waste. Outside of the railway station, sites are leased by Chintan on a year-to-year basis.

At each site, waste-pickers are employed to collect waste from the area within the contract and take it to a separating facility. Another set of workers sort the incoming waste into compostable and dry waste, and the dry waste into over 15 different material subsets. The employees of each site cycle between each responsibility. Each of these is packaged, cleaned if applicable, and sold to a third-party recycling dealer. The amount of each material type is recorded each day to keep a running log of the amount of waste collected. Sites also operate composting facilities where the wet waste is composted and the product is either given to the producer or sold to the public. The proceeds generated from the sale of recyclable materials and compost provide the funds to operate the site and compensate waste-pickers for their work at a living wage. Former waste-pickers, or individuals who have been heavily involved in the waste-picking process in the past, often serve as managers at the sites. The benefits of this system include:

1. Nearly zero-cost waste disposal for the customer. 2. Segregation of waste into recyclable or compostable categories, diverting vast amounts of

waste from landfills. 3. Living wages for waste-pickers and formalization into the waste disposal process. 4. Proven, sustainable success using proceeds generated from the work of the site.

Page 5: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

4

New Delhi Railway Station Site

The largest site operated by Safai Sena is at the New Delhi Municipal Railway Station. This site has been in operation since 2010 and currently employs over 70 workers. The contract allows the workers to collect waste from the sixteen platforms and trains that terminate at the station. The railway station contracts with a private company to collect the waste on the tracks which is sent to a landfill. Safai Sena estimates that six to eight tons of waste per month is collected by the workers for sorting at the site. While it previously operated on a contract that had to be renewed each year, it recently signed a multi-year contract, giving the site and workers an increased level of stability and job security.

Replicating and Adapting Zero-Waste Model

Chintan has facilitated a sustainable, decentralized model of waste management through its work with Safai Sena. However, it is not replicable in all regions due to limitations on (1) available land (2) available workforce, and (3) external waste collectors already employed in other regions. Chintan should focus on the key elements that are necessary to create the same outcomes that the Safai Sena model delivers, while being open to adapting those that are not essential for its success. We see the following elements as essential for creating decentralized zero-waste outcomes:

1. A workforce available to collect waste on a regular and scheduled basis, 2. A site to bring collected waste to for material separation, 3. A workforce that is able to sort waste into its material components, 4. A market with strong demand for raw recyclable materials, 5. An entity that is able to commit to, ideally, multi-year contracts for waste collection.

If these core elements are present, a decentralized zero-waste model can be implemented in any accommodating area. Chintan must remain open to adapting the Safai Sena model in a way that allows individual circumstances within its target area to dictate the final shape of the model. As a result, the operations at each site may be quite different, though still working towards sustainability and zero-waste. Some possible examples of this may be:

1. A site where waste-pickers contract to collect waste from a site and bring it to a privately owned separation and recyclable facilities. In this instance, it would be necessary to contract with the facility, with the waste producer, or both, to ensure living wage payments and formal recognition for the waste collection.

2. A contract with a corporation where the business entity provides the space and covers the cost of a separation facility as part of their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) work. Waste-pickers would formally operate on-site to collect, sort, and sell recyclable and compostable material generated by the facility.

Page 6: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

5

Developing an Advocacy Plan

Introduction

Outlining a long-term strategy when advocating for a specific policy change is essential to reaching your interim and long-term goals. Although non-profit organizations across the world, especially within India, have many barriers to reaching their advocacy goals, success is possible with diverse thinking and strategic planning.

Spontaneity and flexibility are qualities necessary for any non-governmental organization (NGO) to function, however these elements must coincide within a broad, pre-determined strategy so each branch of the organization remains focused on the end goal. Chintan’s main goal and mission is to see successful sustainable development in and around New Delhi. One of the main vessels for reaching this goal is amplifying the sustainable work of the informal sector. Years of successful policy campaigns have raised awareness of how wastepickers and models such as Safai Sena’s can impact Delhi. However, after researching and observing Chintan’s work, it is apparent that more long-term planning and strategic advocacy would benefit your organization in extending its overarching mission.

To do this, we have designed a strategic approach encompassing three components that build on an overarching theme of relationship building across sectors. The three components examine how strategic relationships across sectors (Other NGOs, Government, and Private Sector) can aid to policy strategies:

1) Coalition Building for Political Pressure 2) Building Strategic Relationships 3) Expanding Social Media

Each component includes a description and explanation for why they are equally significant. It is important to remember that these components are meant to intertwine and build on successes in the others. What’s more, the outline of the strategy is meant to be interactive, expandable, and adaptable to any changing circumstances as well as interact with the evaluation framework. To illustrate this interaction, the final section of the deliverable provides an example of the advocacy strategy informing with the evaluation mechanisms and vice versa.

Page 7: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

6

Component One: Coalition Building for Political Pressure

Introduction

Since the late 1990s, NGOs have been forced to learn new political strategies that address rapid globalization and a shift in world dynamics. Developing countries have started to play larger roles with increased international cooperation through treaties and agreements in areas that were previously dominated by action within civil society. Large international institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have shifted their focus to engage in a broader set of economic issues at a state level. NGOs at a local level, including Chintan, can learn from this shift. They must leverage networks and relationships to form coalitions that fundamentally shape policy agendas and political goals.1

Coalition building is a critical element for any NGO’s strategy. Coalition building has been defined as, “the ongoing process of cultivating and maintaining relationships with a diverse network of individuals and organizations who share a common set of principles and values.”2 Forming networks with other likeminded groups and organizations can enhance your overall impact. Chintan can gain access to a more diverse range of constituencies, ultimately magnifying your visibility for politicians eager to please their communities. There are many forms of coalitions and ways to apply pressure through increased networks and connections.

1 “Creating a Better World: Interpreting Global Civil Society” 133. 2 “Coalition Building and Networking”

Page 8: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

7

Case Study: Advocacy Coalition Framework in China

There are several proven examples illustrating how coalition building can make a real difference in influencing policymaking. For example, the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) explains value expansion across sectors, and bottom-up pressure from diverse non-state entities including international players in policymaking. In China, ACF was proven successful in halting a state initiative that would construct 13 dams, displacing over 50,000 people. Environmental organizations opposed this project because of concern for the potential negative environmental and social impacts that would much outweigh the economic development and increased renewable energy generation. The opponents called for proper Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) by the government, which would require the project planes to seek opinions from relevant stakeholders, experts and the general public.

After one organization raised awareness of the EIA requirement before project approval, several environmental organizations and journalists launched a national opposition campaign, raising concerns for the potential threats to environmental and cultural diversity in the river’s region. The opposition group utilized several different methods to gain international attention, including appealing to the United Nations by pointing out that part of river’s surrounding area is a United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Site. The site encompasses over 3,500 unique plant and animal species that could be endangered with the construction of the dams without the EIA indicating their safety.

After the initial campaign, an EIA was conducted and called for a modification of the proposal that would scale back the amount of dams and power-generation capacity. However, opponents scrutinized the EIA process that was performed behind closed doors and for not including the voices of relevant stakeholders including local residents that would be most affected by the dam’s construction. Opponents then sought further international attention, which gained the attention of the Premier, who eventually suspended the project.

This case successfully shows how a group of NGO actors rallied the public, media sector and international organizations to derail a powerful state-led project. Each creative and strategic action taken by the coalition took place over a 10-year time period. The coalition appealed to international organizations to garner more support while educating the local residents on the potential impacts of the project as well as empowering them to fight for their voices. Although communication and intervention was planned out, there was also inherent adaptability as circumstances changed. Under the ACF, the coalition was necessary to allow the initial opposing organization to lean on the strengths and tools of allied organizations while fighting for what they believe is right for the Nu River region and peoples. Chintan has the opportunity to utilize these strategies to influence Delhi policymaking. Source: Policy Advocacy Coalitions as Causes of Policy Change in China? Analyzing Evidence from Contemporary Environmental Politics

Page 9: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

8

Recommendations and Action Items:

Below is a list of action items that Chintan can further develop and work into their campaigns, keeping in mind the overall goal of influencing policy change so that sustainable waste management can be replicated.

1. Conduct strategic rallies, community gatherings and educational programs. You are already hosting successful rallies, community gatherings and educational programs. However, by working with other organizations, you can identify parallel causes and help each other elevate the publicity and recognition.

2. Strengthen civil society’s role in budget making. Currently 7% of the New Delhi Municipal Government’s spending in the 2015-2016 fiscal year goes to sanitation, this can be close to zero with contracting waste pickers.

3. Identify items on India’s political agenda that Chintan and partnering organizations can amplify and help achieve. India’s leaders have signed onto the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Part of this pledge includes the government calling for improved sanitation, health, education, and more. The government plans to utilize public private partnerships to develop 100 smart cities that will follow low carbon pathways. Educating the public on the SDGs that India has pledged to will remind the government of these commitments while showing them what organizations can be a tool for creating change.

4. Facilitate meaningful dialogue and conversations on sustainable waste management. This can be done by working with the government or other NGOs to organize informal roundtable discussions on how each sector can help each other while finding common ground. Proving to the government that there are groups within Delhi fighting for these causes that will equally benefit the government’s agenda will catch their attention. You can show then openly discuss how the government can amplify your efforts.

5. Expand Chintan’s communication with the public. Chintan already does a lot to gain a respectful audience within the Delhi public, however, there are more ways that Chintan can increase this relationship. Examples of initiatives that can garner attention from varying levels of the public include writing weekly blog posts on the new website that appeal to an academic audience or host a regular podcast with guest speakers that will appeal to a younger audience. Additionally, Chintan can vamp up their social media presence through utilizing a unique hashtag (#) that will easily be identifiable and can resonate throughout Delhi and the surrounding area. An example hashtag could be #DontWasteWaste.3

6. Emphasize Public Private Partnerships. The NGO sector can have an important role in facilitating public-private partnerships. In 1997, the World Bank published a World Development Report with a new definition of states within developing countries and called it, “The State in a Changing World”. Under this definition, the new role of a state

3 There is more about this in the Component 3 portion of this text.

Page 10: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

9

is to meet the demands of a globalizing economy through strategic partnerships with the private sector. The report argues that local governments can no longer function as the only direct influencers of growth and must transform to accommodate external resources and partners.4 You can leverage this by facilitating relationships between the government and private partners while offering innovative solutions.

Ally Organizations

It is important to identify what organizations you have a relationship with as well as organizations you would like to have a relationship with. Below is a list of organizations that we have begun to identify for you, however, it is important to continue building out this list and answering why they are important and what kind of mutual relationship has the potential to exist.

• National Foundation For India (NFI) • Development Alternatives Group • WIEGO, Global Alliance of Waste Pickers • Saahas Zero-Waste Solutions • Self Employed Woman’s Association (SEWA) • World Resources Institution India – RaahGiriDay • Stree Mukti Sanghatana (SMS) – Women’s Liberation Organization: Based in Mumbai,

this organization trains waste sources on how to segregate waste from dry waste • Living Earth Foundation – Waste to Wealth in Africa • Goong – collects and repurposes waste as collateral for a service

External Examples

Right to Information Campaign: The Right to Information Campaign was established in 1996 and pushed for the Right to Information Act. The National Campaign for People’s Right to Information (NCPRI) was established by over 100 activist organizations. The campaign currently works with states in implementing the law and to advocate for no amendments or weakening of provisions. The NCPRI also helps with filing information requests, holding public hearings, and fighting legal cases related to information.

Nine is Mine Campaign: Launched by over 4,000 children in Delhi, the Nine is Mine campaign is an initiative that is being led across 15 states in India. The campaign involves children, schools, communities, and organizations being led by Wada Na Todo Abhiyan (WNTA), a national campaign to hold the government accountable to its promise to end poverty, social exclusion, and discrimination. The campaign advocates for 9% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to be committed to health and education spending.

Breakthrough’s Campaign: Breakthrough is an international human rights organization that aims to end violence against women and girls. Breakthrough has performed advocacy campaigns such as the Bell Bajao (Ring The Bell) which an advocacy campaign for men and boys to act as partners at ending domestic violence against women. Another successful program called, Nation Against Early Marriage program aims to end early marriage for girls to prevent gender based issues. This program involves community organizations, mass media, self-help groups, youth groups, and others in implementation.

4 “Chapter 3: Institutions for Sustainable Development”

Page 11: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

10

Component Two: Building Strategic Relationships

Introduction

The previous component shows how coalition building with likeminded non-governmental actors can benefit policy change while this prong focuses on building strategic relationships within the Delhi government.

In academia, development takes on the form of a triangle: economic development, human development, and social development. Governments of developing countries ultimately seek to expand their economic position in the global power struggle but often expand so rapidly that the human and social components cannot catch up with the economic development. India as a leader in the developing world has unfortunately followed this trend. Lombard and du Preez say, “the primary goal of partnerships in social development is to strategically join efforts to reduce poverty, address inequalities and social injustices through the redistribution of resources, and through social and economic development programmes.”5 The NGO sector of India is aware of the need for social and human development, but in most cases, the government does not respond. Therefore, it is imperative that the NGO sector partners with the government to act as a vehicle and resource for social and human change.6

There is no single strategy or method for building relationships across sectors. Although overall the Delhi government may not acknowledge the value in waste pickers and zero waste sites, there are individuals within the government that will be willing to listen and it is possible to appeal to individual interests. Identifying these individuals and building a trusting rapport with them is the first step in influencing your desired change.

5 “Challenges for Building Partnerships in Social Development” 231. 6 “Challenges for Building Partnerships in Social Development” 232.

Page 12: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

11

Push  the  Government  

Support  the  Government  

Act  as  a  Resource  for  the  

Government  

Recommendations and Action Items:

There is no textbook on how to build relationships with government officials. However, there are several actions that can help any individual or organization interact more effectively with their local governments. The process can be broken into three stages:

When organizations are interacting with the government in an effort to influence policy, it is helpful to follow a trend that begins with (1) pushing the government to consider the policy change you are asking for. After you get the attention of the individual or department, then you (2) support them in creating the reform through rallying the public in favor of the change or regularly meeting to check progress and share information. Finally, after the desired policy is enacted, you (3) act as a resource for the government as implementation of the policy begins.

Before you begin actively pushing the government to consider sustainable waste management. It is necessary to identify individuals that would be most available to contact. To do this, you can create a map of the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) then build out the roles of each important actor within NDMC then track your communication with these individuals. View Figure One and Figure Two for the beginnings of a networking map and table of relevant individuals within the NDMC.7 Within the table are four individuals that we have identified as potential allies within NDMC, you can further build the map and table out while identifying connections to these people and departments.

After you get the attention of your targeted individuals and departments within the government, it is important to be prepared to convince them of why they should care. To do this, you can develop several one-page descriptions of why sustainable waste management is necessary in Delhi and how their department can make a meaningful difference. Although tedious, having several different one-pagers that each serve a different purpose is helpful when speaking with multiple people that each have unique interests. Additionally, these one-pagers can evolve as different social and economic interests change. For example, when pollution is at an all time high, you can appeal to the government by providing a one-pager that demonstrates how utilizing zero waste models reduces pollution in the long-term.

What’s more, you can work with the contacts you have made in other NGOs to develop a list of agenda items that they are trying to push within the government to try to develop a mutually beneficial policy while tapping into each other’s networks.

7 Adapted from the New Delhi Municipal Council “Organization Chart”.

Page 13: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

12

Figure One: Network Map of the New Delhi Municipal Council

Chairman    (Shri  Naresh  Kumar,  IAS)    

Financial  Advisor  (Ms.  Geetali  Tare,  IA&AS)  

Finance  Department  (Director,  Sh.  

Ramenand  Bhagat)  

Accounts  Department    (Director,  Sh.  

Ramanand  Bhagat)  

Chief  Advisor  (Law)  (JusHce  R.B.  Misra)  

Revenue  Advisor    (Sh.  T.K.  Sanyal)  

Secretary  (Ms.  Chanchal  Yadav,  IAS)  

CVO    (Ms.  Charchal  Yadav,  

IAS)  

Chief  Auditor  (Mrs.  Varsha  Tiwary  

Sh.  Anup  S.  Budhwar    (Addl.  DCA)  

Sh.  M.  S.  Khan  (OSD  to  Chairman)  

Page 14: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

13

Figure Two: Networking Table for the New Delhi Municipal Council

Name Title Department Reason for Contacting Connections Shri Rajeev Sood

Chief Architect Architecture Dpt.

Designs and formulates architectural schemes for various services for social welfare. Zero waste sites can be built into new infrastructure schemes to increase efficiency and guarantee collection from waste pickers.

Manish Sisodia

Deputy Chief Minister

Government of Delhi

Has submitted an application for net metering of systems and grid connectivity through solar power with the Commercial Department. Their interest in solar power indicates and understanding of environmental efficiency and economic opportunities.

Shri J.P. Sharma

Director of Horticulture

Horticulture Department

The horticulture department looks after all public greens and part of their listed activities include maintenance and creating public awareness of conservation of these green areas. Chintan can work with them to employ wastepickers in these areas.

Dr. P.K. Sharma

MOH Public Health

Health Department

The public health department is going to increase steps to prevent and control communicable diseases in the region. Reduced waste and more safe and sanitary means of collecting waste can reduce the impact and spread of disease.

Page 15: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

14

Component Three: Social Media

Introduction

Social media is becoming one of the most impactful forms of communication across a multitude of stakeholders and community members. Any organization should develop a unique and strategic social media strategy that can be easily mendable to whatever campaign is currently in progress or planned for the future. Both Components One and Two must utilize social media to rally community members as well as inform political dialogue.

Chintan already has a presence on social media that is a great start to developing further engagement. Currently your social media usage hovers around the academic and international media space. However, it is important to utilize each social media method to engage a diverse audience. Distinguishing long-term social media campaigns from daily usage is essential to implementing a powerful cyber presence.

Page 16: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

15

Recommendations and Action Items

To expand Chintan’s social media efforts, you must first clarify your overall goals. After identifying long-term goals, you must distinguish between what social media platforms you will utilize for reaching specific targeted audiences. Developing a social media “look ahead” is helpful in organizing each social media platform and creating interconnectivity between each. Below is a screenshot of a real organization’s social media look ahead that focused on promoting a specific campaign.

Each social media platform is listed on the left and each day of the week is listed on the top. This organization planned each day out three months in advance then every Monday morning they adjusted the week ahead to account for any changes in current campaigns or incorporate new information. Each day had a specific theme that would help plan each post. For example, Tuesdays were “Inspiration Tuesday”, meaning each social media post would attempt to provide quotes, stories, or information that would inspire their audience.

To actually implement the look ahead, you can utilize a website called “Hootsuite”. This free website will allow Chintan to organize each social media platform while collecting valuable metric and data information that can further inform future social media usage. Each Monday when you adjust the week ahead, you can plug into Hootsuite each tweet, facebook, and instagram post. Chintan does not have an instagram, however, this is a growing social media tool that will allow Chintan to further connect with interested youth in Delhi.

Outlined below are several questions and answers to help illustrate what a successful social media strategy could look like:

How often should Chintan be using social media daily?

• Twitter: 2-3 tweets per day, 7 days a week (14 tweets at a minimum) • Facebook: 1 post per day, 5 days a week (5 posts in total)

Page 17: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

16

• Instagram: 2-3 pictures per week (2 posts at a minimum). Pictures can be of wastepickers with a link to their story or of facts and figures that illustrate why sustainable development is important.

• Blogs: 1-2 per week (1 post at a minimum). Blogs are beneficial in articulating more detailed information as well as providing content for other social media platforms and posts.

How often should Chintan be using social media during large campaigns?

• Twitter: 4-6 tweets per day, 7 days a week (28 tweets at a minimum) • Facebook: 2 posts per day, 5 days a week (10 posts in total) • Instagram: 1-2 posts per day, 7 days a week (7 posts at a minimum). Pictures can be

similar to daily instagram but should also be of Chintan’s team. People like to connect with other people; therefore showing who Chintan is can boost youth engagement.

• Blogs: 2-3 per week (2 posts at a minimum)

What should daily posts look like?

• Twitter: o Tweet 1: Fact of the day/link to report o Tweet 2: Call to action o Tweet 3: Push other SM platforms (i.e. blogs, podcast, instagram)

• Facebook: o Academic post – link to report or news article o Push other social media platforms – (i.e. blogs, podcast, instagram, twitter) o Example: “for more information check out our website and twitter or instagram”

• Instagram: o This is an opportunity to reach out to the younger, middle class generation o Posts should making them aware of the social injustice and how it will affect them

in the future (i.e. increased waste without a sustainable solution will make your living space dirtier and dirtier until the only solution is rapid incineration aka more pollution)

o Pictures should be of the waste pickers but they should not make the viewer sad. The pictures should show examples of how sustainable wastepicking can improve lives and the environment. The viewer should get excited about the concept of sustainability and a cleaner city.

§ An example could be of waste pickers working in a sustainable, zero waste site – providing for their families and cleaning up large, commercial areas.

Although these social media tools and strategies have a lot of detail, they are just a beginning for what Chintan can do to improve their virtual presence. The more you utilize these tools and plan ahead, the more you will be able to accomplish.

Page 18: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

17

Application of the Advocacy Strategy Framework

We present the Advocacy Strategy Framework detailed in Thinking Strategically: Applying a Strategic Framework to Advocacy Activities within the context of the advocacy strategy for the expansion of the decentralized waste model to give you a working example of this tool. For more detailed information on the mechanics of creating each component, please refer to the Thinking Strategically report.

Goals:

Expected Results Which indicators

will be used to measure success?

What is the current status of the indicator?

How far do you want the indicator

to move?

How will indicator data be collected

and who is responsible?

Goal: Solid Waste Management Policy that supports decentralized, sustainable waste practices

• Expansion of zero-waste processing sites throughout New Delhi.

• Government policy that supports decentralized waste management.

There is currently political support for waste-to-energy expansion. No formal advocacy efforts have been undertaken.

Policy passed by the New Delhi government that rejects waste-to-energy facilities and supports decentralized waste management.

Policy tracking of the issue by the Advocacy Staff.

The ultimate goal of the campaign is to create a solid waste management policy that supports a decentralized, sustainable system. A successful campaign will entail the expansion of the zero-waste model through a formal governmental policy that supports this system.

Page 19: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

18

Interim Outcomes:

Expected Results Which indicators

will be used to measure success?

What is the current status of the indicator?

How far do you want the indicator

to move?

How will indicator data be collected

and who is responsible?

Interim Outcome: Increased Number of Partner Organizations

Number of organizations that Chintan has formally aligned with or cooperated with on its activities.

One. Chintan currently partners with Safai Sena.

Partner with 4 additional organizations.

The Advocacy Staff will track interactions with organizations.

Interim Outcome: Increased Number of Decentralized Waste Sites

• Number of new decentralized waste sites in the city.

• Tons of waste collected at decentralized sites.

• Number of people/households served.

Safai Sena currently operates 7 waste sites in the City. Baseline waste data to be compiled

• Have at least commitments for 5 new contracts by the end of 2016.

• 35% increase in the total amount of waste collected.

• 10% increase in households served.

The Advocacy Staff will work with the organizations that contract in the decentralized model to collect and monitor baseline information.

Interim Outcome: Build Public Support for Local, Decentralized Waste Management

• Increased social media activity.

• Increased earned media.

• Increased number of residential households using decentralized waste systems.

Unknown. Baseline information not yet collected.

• 10% increase in comments and shares.

• 3 additional, issue specific media mentions per month.

• 10% increase in residential households served.

The Advocacy Staff and interns will track media activity and work with organizations to monitor baseline decentralized waste activity.

Interim outcomes and their associated indicators will be important to evaluate to track progress towards the achievement of the goal. As the advocacy plan focuses on relationship building, two of the interim outcomes are associated with measuring progress towards this goal.

Page 20: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

19

Activities:

What must be done to

achieve interim

outcomes

What interim outcome will

success on the activity contribute

to?

Which indicators will monitor

progress?

Where is the output

now?

How far do you want to move the

output?

How will data be collected and who is

responsible?

Activity: Network Building

Increased number of partner organizations

• Number of organizations identified and contacted.

• Types of constituencies represented.

• Number of meetings among members.

Currently we partner with Safai Sena,

• Identify and contact 8 organizations that may be interested in this issue.

• Meet in-person with 5 organizations.

Interns and volunteers will identify possible organizations, the Advocacy Staff will track contact with organizations.

Activity: Public Information Campaign

Build Public Support for Local, Decentralized Waste Management

• Number of social media posts per week on the issue.

• Number of houses face-to-face contact and information distributed at.

• Number of Earned Media mentions of decentralized waste management.

Unknown. Baseline information not yet collected.

• 5 social media posts per week, using various mediums, on the issue.

• 30% of households contacted given information.

• 3 earned media mentions per month.

The Advocacy Staff, with the help of interns, will monitor and track the public information campaign.

Activity: Decentralized Waste Model Expansion

Increased Number of Decentralized Waste Sites

• Number of possible sites/partners identified and contacted.

Currently there are 7 decentralized waste sites.

• Identify and contact 15 RWA’s, government buildings, or Condos.

• Secure meetings with 8 sites/partners.

Interns and volunteers will identify possible organizations, the Advocacy Staff will track contact with organizations.

Activities are also crucial to monitor and assess their impact in relation to the interim outcomes. While many indicators would allow Chintan to monitor progress on each, we have narrowed down the scope to only the most important measures. Once again, activities relating to network building have a prominent place in the advocacy strategic framework due to its importance in the advocacy plan. While we do offer targets for Chintan to strive for on each, you should carefully review and adjust these measures to ensure they are ambitious yet achievable for you.

Page 21: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

20

Review:

Chintan should track these measures and engage in a constant review process to ensure that the knowledge and data that results from this process is used and informs your decision-making. Discussions on progress towards each component should take place (1) informally at monthly meetings (2) formally at quarterly progress meetings and (3) at annual review sessions.

Page 22: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

21

Application of Impact Evaluation

Social Media Measurement Tool  

Social media is a critical platform for organizations and enterprises to expand their social influence, gain public awareness and hold campaigns to achieve specific social or marketing objectivity. We do realize that Chintan has already established a well-maintained and frequently updated Facebook page with an impressive volume of followers and active online participations. However, it is also important to track social media activity to learn from both successful and failed engagement.

There are two types of social media measurement. The first, Ongoing Analytics, tracks social media activities overtime while the second, Campaign-focused Metrics, analyzes a specific campaign or event.8 Here we will provide a social media measurement tool for Chintan that applies well to both types of measurement and can be easily operated by staff as daily work.  

Step 1: Clarify Social Goals  

Before jumping in to measure every Facebook status, photo and comment, it is important to think about what goal Chintan wants to achieve through these social platforms. A clear goal helps you understand your target audience and select the best social media type. It also helps you to think about what you expect the audience do with your content posted (read, share, comment, engage). For example, one of the goals of Chintan’s Facebook page can be to spread awareness of the E-waste campaign and motivate public participation.  

Step 2: Develop Metrics  

Once you have identified social media goals you set up appropriate metrics for tracking. The metrics we have identified include: numbers of followers, status, photos, comments, shares, “likes”. We also identify some metrics that can more accurately reflect the public engagement.  

o Conversation rate: The average number of conversations per post. On Facebook, it is the number of replies per status and photo.  

o Amplification rate: Amplification is the “reshare”, “retweet” of a post. On Facebook, it is the number of share per post.  

o Applause rate: Each social media has an easy way to express appreciation. On Facebook, it is the number of “like” each post gets.  

o Relative engagement rate: relative engagement rate measures the engagement rate per follower. It allows you to compare the engagement between different social media work to improve these rates accordingly.9

8  “The Five Easy Steps to Measure Your Social Media Campaign”, 2012  9    Adapted from “Social Engagement Metrics That Matter- Measuring, Tracking and Reporting FTW”, 2014  

Page 23: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

22

Step 3: Measure  

You can use different online tools to obtain more detailed and systematic measurements, such as “TrueSocialMetrics” or “Socdir.” You can also establish your own format to track the activity on Google sheets that is accessible to all field staff to track social media performance. Table 1 provides an example of how to track Facebook on both a weekly and monthly basis.  

Table 1. Example of Facebook performance log10  Monthly Summary  

Facebook  

  Status   Replies   Shares   Likes   Followers   Convo  Rate  

Amplify rate  

Applause rate  

Dec-13                  

Jan-13                  

Feb-13                  

Weekly Summary  

 

Dec-1                  

Dec-8                  

Dec-15                  

Dec-22                  

Dec-29                  

   

10  Adapted  from  Ibid.  

Page 24: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

23

Chintan can then make a comparison of key metrics between different social media types within a same time period to evaluate their respective performance and thus make corresponding strategies on each platform.    

Table 2. Example of social media performance summary on a monthly basis11  

  Tweet   Facebook page  

Google +   LinkedIn   Youtube   Blog  

Conversation rate  (Comments per post)  

           

Amplification rate  (Shares per post)  

           

Applause rate  (Favorite per post)  

           

# Post              

# Comments              

# Repost              

# Favorite              

This is based on the time Periods: DD/MM/XXXXX-DD/MM/XXXX  

11  Adapted  from  Ibid.  

Page 25: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

24

 

Step Four: Report Results  

The final step is to report the results based on the weekly and monthly log. We recommend Chintan uses the initial findings as a baseline or benchmark for future measurement. It is necessary for Chintan to share the findings within the organization regularly and with donors in your quarterly report.  

When reporting the results you should compare the metrics to your expectations and goals. Table 3 shows an example of how you can track progress. You can also make charts or graphs to visualize the results. In addition, a monthly email to all staff reviewing the engagement rate over time would also be useful in assessing trends and what could be improved.  

 

                                                          Table 3. Example of Social Media Measurement Report 12

Weekly KPI (Key Performance Indicator)  

Baseline  

(Based on weekly average from DD/MM to DD/MM)  

Percent increase  

Goal  

(Goal from DD/MM to DD/MM  

Current  

(Average from DD/MM to current)  

Percent Goal complete  

Followers            

Visits            

Conversation rates            

Amplification rate            

Applause rate            

Relative Conversation rates (per 1000)  

         

Relative Amplification rate (per 1000)  

         

Relative Applause rate  (per 1000)  

         

 

 

12  Adapted  from  Ibid.  

Page 26: Advocacy Plan and Application to Framework

References

Academic Freedom Workshops: Advocacy Curriculum. 2009. Coalition Building and Networking. Scholars at Risk Network.

Chapter 3: Institutions for Sustainable Development. (2003). World Development Report 2003. The World Bank Group.

Jenn Deering Davis “The Five Easy Steps to Measure Your Social Media Campaign”, 2012,

https://blog.kissmetrics.com/social-media-measurement/

Jennita “Social Engagement Metrics That Matter- Measuring, Tracking and Reporting FTW” 2014, https://moz.com/blog/social-engagement-metrics-that-matter

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis. (2014). Policy Advocacy Coalitions as Causes of Policy Change in China? Analyzing Evidence from Contemporary Environmental Politics. Han, Swedlow & Unger.

Journal of Social Work. (2004). Challenges for Building Partnerships in Social Development. Lombard & du Preez.

New Delhi Municipal Council. Organization Chart. 2015.

Taylor, R. (2004). Creating a better world: Interpreting global civil society. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.