ad-feb-2011

Upload: thang-tran

Post on 07-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    1/24

    PWR

    Anaerobic Digestion

    &

    Municipal Waste Water Treatment

    A Project Road-Map

    For Bulgaria

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    2/24

    PWR

    Presentation Structure

    1. Anaerobic Digestion & Waste Water TreatmentWhat are we talking about ?What are the first questions municipalities need toanswer?

    2. Feedstocksjust sewage sludge? or can other feed-stocks be used?

    What is the gas yield from sewage sludge and otherfeedstocks?

    3. What does AD cost? Does it make any money? Costs & Possible Revenues An Outline Action Plan

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    3/24

    PWR

    AD Advantages

    - less sludge to dispose of after AD (reduces cost$ for theWWTP)

    - sludge can be spread on agricultural land or $old- AD plants can be compact- Sewage sludge is stabilised by AD- bioga$ production

    AD Disadvantages

    - no nitrogen elimination,- process control & know-how needed,- not able to easily adapt to large changes in flow volumes

    Why AD?

    And of course it is possible to make $$$$$$$ from AD

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    4/24

    PWRWhat are we talking about?

    Anaerobic Digestion & Waste Water Treatment

    Henriskdal WWTP - Sweden

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    5/24

    PWR

    Question 1a & 1b for Municipalities

    1a: What volume of waste water occur

    1b. What is the Dry Matter Content of Your Waste Water?

    1. Measure off-line through drying and weighing (but only

    measures samples not flows)

    2. Microwave measurement on-line - can measure a flowwith sampling rate of seconds (but only handles DMs of 3 to15%).

    3. Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) on-line technique canbe used at various points in the AD process

    Methods

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    6/24

    PWR

    Question 2 for Municipalities

    What is the Energy Content ($$$) of Your Waste Water?

    1. COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand, indirect measurement of

    organic compounds (but no correlation to energy content)

    2. Calorimetry: dry the sample and then burn it & measureenergy

    Traditional Methods

    Problem!!: tends to underestimate energy content of

    waste water by up to 20%* becausedrying causes loss of volatile matter

    *Source: Elizabeth Heidrich, PhD student, Newcastle University UK.

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    7/24

    PWRDecision Point 1

    Build MWWSystem Only

    Build MWWSystem &Plan for AD(later)

    Build MWWSystem &AD

    Decision Point 2

    AD using

    only MWWsludge

    AD &Co-digestion

    BudgetIssue

    Availability ofother materialfor AD

    Suitability ofother materialfor AD

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    8/24

    PWRGas Yields

    &Why Co-Digestion is (very) desirable

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    9/24

    PWRMore Data on Gas Yields

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    10/24

    PWR

    Question 3

    a. How much material for co-digestion is available?b. Is it available on a regular basis? (seasonal basis?)c. Could the supplier be charged for disposing of it (= revenue stream)d. How far away is it (transport costs an issue?)

    Is the material viable (both from an AD and financialpoint of view for inclusion in the AD project)

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    11/24

    PWRIs Co-Digestion Worth it?

    1. Biogas to produce electricity2. Biogas to fuel vehicles3. Pelletised sluge to use in, e.g. cement production*4. Acceptance fees for industrial/commercial waste

    * Biogasmax Report: WWTP Bern

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    12/24

    PWR

    AD forMunicipal Waste Water Treatment

    1. High rate system (short hydraulic retention times)(usually solids retention time = hydraulic retention time)

    2. Single stage system (i.e. one AD tank)

    3. But several different processes to choose from:

    WABIO one step systemBTA single stageLinde KCA process

    4. Most common process: activated sludge process(as used in Swedish AD system)

    Budget,flex

    ibilityofthe

    process,space

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    13/24

    PWRADSystem Size

    An example from XXXXXXX for one house

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    14/24

    PWRAD & Energy Self-Sufficiency

    Location: Juhned, Germany, 800 population

    System: AD plant using local biomass (animal manure) plusCHP/district heating

    Politics: System is communally financed & ownedEnd Result: Export 50% of power produced, 99% self-sufficient in

    energy for heating

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    15/24

    PWR

    WWTP Luzern 2000 to 2006 wastewater treatment plant wasredeveloped (to include AD)

    Total AD module costs 750 /m digester volume (WETT 2009)10 % costs for machine technology

    90 % for physical facilities (KOBEL and BGUE 2008).Overhead expenses - approval and planning 10 % totalinvestment costs (KTBL 2007).

    Pumps & controls (import?)

    Tanks, bases etc (make locally?)

    Capital Costs A Swiss Example

    Source: Assessment Report on Operational Experience Biogasmax

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    16/24

    PWRCapital Costs II

    Capex Costs for Electricity Generation: Euro 750/kW(Source: 2008 SLR study)

    Similar costs for biogas into gas grid or use with gas engine

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    17/24

    PWROperating Costs vs Gas Market Prices I

    Cost to produce 1m3 biogas from the AD process = Euro 0.09(From Luzern Switzerland*)

    Methane content = 62.5%

    Converting to kwhrs = (approx) 7kwhrs (assuming 11kwhrs per m3 natural gas)

    Cost to produce 1kwhrs of gas from AD with sewage sludge = Euro 0.013

    Current Bulgarian (domestic) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.0351/kWhrCurrent Bulgarian (industrial) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.0215/kWhr

    Biogas prices for vehicles: Euro 0.42/m3

    Lesson: AD gas can be produced @ 60% less than the selling price ofdomestic gas, 35% less than the selling price of industrial gas and66% less than the selling price for gas for vehicles.

    *Source: Assessment Report on Operational Experience Biogasmax

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    18/24

    PWR

    Rubbish collection vehiclesfuelled by.. rubbish

    Combined waste treatmentplant & bus depot with thebuses power by..

    France

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    19/24

    PWROperating Costs vs Gas Market Prices II

    Cost to produce 1m3 biogas from the AD process = Euro 0.19(From Henriksdal Sweden*)

    Methane content = 65%

    Converting to kwhrs = (approx) 7kwhrs (assuming 11kwhrs per m3 natural gas)

    Cost to produce 1kwhrs of gas from AD with sewage sludge = Euro 0.027

    Current Swedish (domestic) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.10/kWhrCurrent Swedish (industrial) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.05/kWhr

    Lesson: Even in a high cost location like Sweden AD & biogas isinteresting as a method to turn waste into revenue

    *Source: Assessment Report on Operational Experience Biogasmax

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    20/24

    PWR

    Commercial Considerations&

    Group Action

    1. Do Bulgarian municipalities have similar types ofwaste water to treat? (probably)

    2. Should Bulgarian municipalities group together

    depending on the flow rates of waste water (and thusthe size and type of AD system they might need) andact as a single unit when purchasing AD systems?

    3. Do you think that the price for a single AD systemmight be different from the price if 10 or 100 are

    purchased?

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    21/24

    PWR

    More Decisions

    Decision Point 3

    Collaborate withother municipalities

    Decision Point 4

    What to do with the gas?

    Option 1Generate Electricity(CHP?)

    Option 2Gas for Vehicles

    Option 3Sell to gas grid

    Clean the gas

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    22/24

    PWR

    1. Detailed feasibility study (Answer Questions 1a, 1b & 2 &.)2. Effective business plan

    2a What size of plant is appropriate2b What type of plant is appropriate)

    2c What other feed-stock is available?2d Citizens participation (partners?) of the bioenergy plant2e Define revenue streams are these realistic

    Project Success Criteria

  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    23/24

    PWR

    Key Documents

    Web site: www.biogasmax.eu(EU project)

    Reports Assessment Report on Operational Experience

    Final Assessment Report on Residual Materials

    Decision Makers Guide: How to Implement aBiomethane Project (for vehicles)

    Arcadis: Final Report Assessment of theOptions to Improve the management of Bio-

    waste in Europe

    http://www.biogasmax.eu/http://www.biogasmax.eu/
  • 8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011

    24/24

    PWR

    AD & Improved Gas Yields

    1. Thermal Hydrolysis (e.g CAMBI method)2. Chemical Hydrolysis3. Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis4. Ozone Treatment

    5. Ultrasound6. Electroporation7. Addition of Enzymes

    Reference: Increased Gas Production @ the Henriksdal Waste Water Treatment Plant ( www.biogasmax.eu ).

    http://www.biogasmax.eu/http://www.biogasmax.eu/