ad-feb-2011
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
1/24
PWR
Anaerobic Digestion
&
Municipal Waste Water Treatment
A Project Road-Map
For Bulgaria
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
2/24
PWR
Presentation Structure
1. Anaerobic Digestion & Waste Water TreatmentWhat are we talking about ?What are the first questions municipalities need toanswer?
2. Feedstocksjust sewage sludge? or can other feed-stocks be used?
What is the gas yield from sewage sludge and otherfeedstocks?
3. What does AD cost? Does it make any money? Costs & Possible Revenues An Outline Action Plan
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
3/24
PWR
AD Advantages
- less sludge to dispose of after AD (reduces cost$ for theWWTP)
- sludge can be spread on agricultural land or $old- AD plants can be compact- Sewage sludge is stabilised by AD- bioga$ production
AD Disadvantages
- no nitrogen elimination,- process control & know-how needed,- not able to easily adapt to large changes in flow volumes
Why AD?
And of course it is possible to make $$$$$$$ from AD
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
4/24
PWRWhat are we talking about?
Anaerobic Digestion & Waste Water Treatment
Henriskdal WWTP - Sweden
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
5/24
PWR
Question 1a & 1b for Municipalities
1a: What volume of waste water occur
1b. What is the Dry Matter Content of Your Waste Water?
1. Measure off-line through drying and weighing (but only
measures samples not flows)
2. Microwave measurement on-line - can measure a flowwith sampling rate of seconds (but only handles DMs of 3 to15%).
3. Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) on-line technique canbe used at various points in the AD process
Methods
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
6/24
PWR
Question 2 for Municipalities
What is the Energy Content ($$$) of Your Waste Water?
1. COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand, indirect measurement of
organic compounds (but no correlation to energy content)
2. Calorimetry: dry the sample and then burn it & measureenergy
Traditional Methods
Problem!!: tends to underestimate energy content of
waste water by up to 20%* becausedrying causes loss of volatile matter
*Source: Elizabeth Heidrich, PhD student, Newcastle University UK.
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
7/24
PWRDecision Point 1
Build MWWSystem Only
Build MWWSystem &Plan for AD(later)
Build MWWSystem &AD
Decision Point 2
AD using
only MWWsludge
AD &Co-digestion
BudgetIssue
Availability ofother materialfor AD
Suitability ofother materialfor AD
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
8/24
PWRGas Yields
&Why Co-Digestion is (very) desirable
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
9/24
PWRMore Data on Gas Yields
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
10/24
PWR
Question 3
a. How much material for co-digestion is available?b. Is it available on a regular basis? (seasonal basis?)c. Could the supplier be charged for disposing of it (= revenue stream)d. How far away is it (transport costs an issue?)
Is the material viable (both from an AD and financialpoint of view for inclusion in the AD project)
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
11/24
PWRIs Co-Digestion Worth it?
1. Biogas to produce electricity2. Biogas to fuel vehicles3. Pelletised sluge to use in, e.g. cement production*4. Acceptance fees for industrial/commercial waste
* Biogasmax Report: WWTP Bern
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
12/24
PWR
AD forMunicipal Waste Water Treatment
1. High rate system (short hydraulic retention times)(usually solids retention time = hydraulic retention time)
2. Single stage system (i.e. one AD tank)
3. But several different processes to choose from:
WABIO one step systemBTA single stageLinde KCA process
4. Most common process: activated sludge process(as used in Swedish AD system)
Budget,flex
ibilityofthe
process,space
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
13/24
PWRADSystem Size
An example from XXXXXXX for one house
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
14/24
PWRAD & Energy Self-Sufficiency
Location: Juhned, Germany, 800 population
System: AD plant using local biomass (animal manure) plusCHP/district heating
Politics: System is communally financed & ownedEnd Result: Export 50% of power produced, 99% self-sufficient in
energy for heating
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
15/24
PWR
WWTP Luzern 2000 to 2006 wastewater treatment plant wasredeveloped (to include AD)
Total AD module costs 750 /m digester volume (WETT 2009)10 % costs for machine technology
90 % for physical facilities (KOBEL and BGUE 2008).Overhead expenses - approval and planning 10 % totalinvestment costs (KTBL 2007).
Pumps & controls (import?)
Tanks, bases etc (make locally?)
Capital Costs A Swiss Example
Source: Assessment Report on Operational Experience Biogasmax
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
16/24
PWRCapital Costs II
Capex Costs for Electricity Generation: Euro 750/kW(Source: 2008 SLR study)
Similar costs for biogas into gas grid or use with gas engine
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
17/24
PWROperating Costs vs Gas Market Prices I
Cost to produce 1m3 biogas from the AD process = Euro 0.09(From Luzern Switzerland*)
Methane content = 62.5%
Converting to kwhrs = (approx) 7kwhrs (assuming 11kwhrs per m3 natural gas)
Cost to produce 1kwhrs of gas from AD with sewage sludge = Euro 0.013
Current Bulgarian (domestic) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.0351/kWhrCurrent Bulgarian (industrial) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.0215/kWhr
Biogas prices for vehicles: Euro 0.42/m3
Lesson: AD gas can be produced @ 60% less than the selling price ofdomestic gas, 35% less than the selling price of industrial gas and66% less than the selling price for gas for vehicles.
*Source: Assessment Report on Operational Experience Biogasmax
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
18/24
PWR
Rubbish collection vehiclesfuelled by.. rubbish
Combined waste treatmentplant & bus depot with thebuses power by..
France
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
19/24
PWROperating Costs vs Gas Market Prices II
Cost to produce 1m3 biogas from the AD process = Euro 0.19(From Henriksdal Sweden*)
Methane content = 65%
Converting to kwhrs = (approx) 7kwhrs (assuming 11kwhrs per m3 natural gas)
Cost to produce 1kwhrs of gas from AD with sewage sludge = Euro 0.027
Current Swedish (domestic) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.10/kWhrCurrent Swedish (industrial) gas prices (EC web site) = Euro 0.05/kWhr
Lesson: Even in a high cost location like Sweden AD & biogas isinteresting as a method to turn waste into revenue
*Source: Assessment Report on Operational Experience Biogasmax
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
20/24
PWR
Commercial Considerations&
Group Action
1. Do Bulgarian municipalities have similar types ofwaste water to treat? (probably)
2. Should Bulgarian municipalities group together
depending on the flow rates of waste water (and thusthe size and type of AD system they might need) andact as a single unit when purchasing AD systems?
3. Do you think that the price for a single AD systemmight be different from the price if 10 or 100 are
purchased?
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
21/24
PWR
More Decisions
Decision Point 3
Collaborate withother municipalities
Decision Point 4
What to do with the gas?
Option 1Generate Electricity(CHP?)
Option 2Gas for Vehicles
Option 3Sell to gas grid
Clean the gas
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
22/24
PWR
1. Detailed feasibility study (Answer Questions 1a, 1b & 2 &.)2. Effective business plan
2a What size of plant is appropriate2b What type of plant is appropriate)
2c What other feed-stock is available?2d Citizens participation (partners?) of the bioenergy plant2e Define revenue streams are these realistic
Project Success Criteria
-
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
23/24
PWR
Key Documents
Web site: www.biogasmax.eu(EU project)
Reports Assessment Report on Operational Experience
Final Assessment Report on Residual Materials
Decision Makers Guide: How to Implement aBiomethane Project (for vehicles)
Arcadis: Final Report Assessment of theOptions to Improve the management of Bio-
waste in Europe
http://www.biogasmax.eu/http://www.biogasmax.eu/ -
8/4/2019 AD-Feb-2011
24/24
PWR
AD & Improved Gas Yields
1. Thermal Hydrolysis (e.g CAMBI method)2. Chemical Hydrolysis3. Thermo-Chemical Hydrolysis4. Ozone Treatment
5. Ultrasound6. Electroporation7. Addition of Enzymes
Reference: Increased Gas Production @ the Henriksdal Waste Water Treatment Plant ( www.biogasmax.eu ).
http://www.biogasmax.eu/http://www.biogasmax.eu/