aboriginal title implementation strategy - 2000
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
1/36
DISC SIX-POINT STRATEGY
DISCUSSION PAPER - DRAFT #3
June 12, 2000
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
2/36
DISC SIX-POINT STRATEGY- DISCUSSION PAPER
DRAFT #3.
Note to readers: This paper is prepared for discussion purposes only. It is intended for
circulation among the technical team for their review and comments, with a view to
reaching agreement on a final draft which will be submitted at the next DISC meeting.
A. BACKGROUND.
For over 250 years, First Nations have been seeking to have their Aboriginal title andrights recognized and affirmed. These efforts pre-date the existing Comprehensive Claims
Policy, and in this context, Delgamuukwmerely vindicated what the elders had been
saying all along.
First Nations profound dissatisfaction with Canadas Comprehensive Claims Policy has
been well known for many years. Outside commentators have also acknowledged that the
policy is increasingly out of step with the legal and political landscape.
In 1993, prior to their election, the federal Liberals committed to a complete overhaul of the
Comprehensive and Specific Claims policies. In fact, Jean Chretien, as leader of the
federal Liberals, made a personal commitment to do this when he announced the Liberal
Aboriginal Electoral Platform in Saskatchewan, in October 1993. These commitments
were also contained in Chapter Seven of the Liberal Partys Red Book I.
In the fall of 1996, RCAPs final report and recommendations called for fundamental policy
change with respect to the Comprehensive Claims policy.
However, then-Minister Jane Stewart informed the AFN Chiefs Committee on Claims on
December 11, 1997, in Ottawa, that Canada was only prepared to enter into a joint review
process with regard to Specific Claims. As an alternative she committed that Canada
would undertake a separate process of review to deal with the CCP.
Ironically, on the same day, the SCCs Delgamuukwruling undermined the very basis of
the Comprehensive Claims policy and process. At the time, it was assumed that this
judgement would hasten a fundamental revision to the CCP.
In January and February 1998, Canada released the Gathering Strength, its general
response to the RCAP final report, and theAgenda for Action, a specific programme
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
3/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 2
1Canada,An Agenda for Act ion with F ir st Nation s (Ottawa: February 1998): p. 3.
relating to the First Nations. These frameworks provided no substantive response to
RCAPs recommendations regarding fundamental policy change on Aboriginal title and
rights. Moreover, they completely ignored the impact of the Delgamuukwdecision.
In fact, theAgenda for Action formally down-graded previous commitments to policy
change by simply indicating that the federal government was prepared to consider and
respond to First Nation concerns regarding the Comprehensive Claims, with a focus onprocess, not the policy:
The portions of theAgenda for Action which relate to the CCP are as follows:
Comprehensive Claims: joint federal government-First Nations exploration of the
Comprehensive Claims Process in order to consider and respond to First Nation
concerns, in part related to the recommendations of RCAP, with the existingprocesses and policies.
Certainty: joint federal government-First Nations exploration of possible methods
other than surrenders or extinguishments of Aboriginal title to provide clarity,
stability and certainty through comprehensive claims settlements and which would
be supported by federal and provincial governments, First Nations and the public.1
Following this, numerous attempts have been made by the AFN, regional organizations,
First Nations, and individual First Nation communities, to have Canada accommodate the
implications of the Delgamuukwruling in its policies and procedures. These efforts have
been rejected and/or avoided. The furthest Canada has been prepared to go is to support
a process of study and review (the DelgamuukwReview & Education initiative), which is
focussed neither on changing the CCP nor on implementing Delgamuukw.
The DelgamuukwImplementation Strategy Committee (DISC) emerged as a response to
this federal refusal to address the issues raised by Delgamuukw, with a mandate from the
Chiefs to proceed with measures to obtain implementation ofDelgamuukwand changes
to prevailing policy. In January 2000, in Vancouver, a meeting of First Nation leaders from
across Canada took place, and a six-point strategy was developed towards this end. This
six-point strategy was considered and adopted by the Confederacy of Nations through
Resolution 7/00 in April, 2000, along with a specific work plan.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
4/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 3
B. RATIONALE FOR THE SIX-POINT STRATEGY.
The rationale for the six-point strategy is that by all accounts, the Government of Canada is
not at this time prepared to commit to a review of the Comprehensive Claims Policy
(CCP), let alone substantive policy changes. Therefore, First Nations need to apply
additional pressure in order to obtain a commitment from the federal government for
substantive policy reform.
The basis for this rationale has been confirmed at a recent meeting with federal officials.
On May 9, 2000, DISC met with senior federal officials to obtain their commitment to a
formal review and revision of the CCP. The AFN tabled a proposal to jointly appoint a
panel of experts who would make recommendations on changes to the policy, to be
followed by mediated negotiations, leading to policy change. At that meeting, federalofficials confirmed that (i) there is no Cabinet mandate to consider changes to the policy,
and (ii) that Minister Robert Nault is not prepared to support a government-wide review of
the policy.
C. OBJECTIVES OF THE SIX-POINT STRATEGY.
There are three key objectives to the six-point strategy:
1. To get the federal government to recognize and implement Aboriginal title, in
accordance with the law.
2. The creation of a new policy framework which recognizes and affirms Aboriginal title.
3. To support First Nation people in the exercise of the rights flowing from their Aboriginal
title, and to obtain benefits from their land and resources.
D. ELEMENTS OF THE SIX-POINT STRATEGY.
The six elements are as follows:
C Public Education
C Political/Negotiation/Pre-Litigation Strategy
C Litigation
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
5/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 4
C Policy Development
C Direct Action/Assertion of Rights
C International Campaign
We will now proceed to provide some detail to each of these, in terms of:
-specific work plan and actions
-time lines
-estimated or projected costs and human resources requirements
-responsibilities
There are two phases involved in the short term:
C
Phase I: Development: Preparation of work plan for consideration and adoption bythe Chiefs in Assembly (April - July 2000).
C Phase II: Implementation: Following the AFN GA, proceed with full implementation
of the work plan (July 2000 - March 2001 and beyond).
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
6/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 5
1. PUBLIC EDUCATION & COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION.
1.1. Objective.
To build public awareness of the issues, and support for the recognition and affirmation of
Aboriginal title, among the First Nation and non-Aboriginal public. This in turn will have an
influence on non-native leaders and policy makers.
1.2. Targets.
Under this heading there are tow main categories: internalwork among the First Nations,
and externalwork among non-native institutions. Both of these contain a number of distincttargets, which will require materials and activities that are tailored to their particular
circumstances (there may be others to add to this list).
1.3. Internal - Community Participation and Traditional Knowledge.
Aboriginal title, as recognized in 1997 by the Supreme Court of Canada in the
Delgamuukwdecision, flows from the diverse legal systems of the various indigenous
nations. It resides collectively with the community, who are instrumental in asserting and
implementing title. Therefore the communities need to be informed and actively involved in
this national initiative to reaffirm and implement Aboriginal title.
From this perspective, it is important to build positive models based on traditional customs
and laws:
-traditional knowledge
-traditional practises
-traditional law-making authorities (Elders) and models, including systems of tenure
(Aboriginal title)
-sustainable development
1.3.1. Step One: Inform and Involve the Communities.
Aboriginal title resides with the people, and it is they who must take the lead in
implementing it. Provide communities with information on Delgamuukw, the CCP, and
efforts they can make to implement Aboriginal title on the ground. Inform First Nation
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
7/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 6
citizens and communities about their rights, and how to exercise and protect them. Keep
updated on developments.
Methods: AFN Messenger (already one insert); AFN website (upload Messenger insert,
key documents, updates, etc.); targeted e-mails; poster; regional forums; development of
how-to materials for distribution at the local level. Utilize Aboriginal media to assist in
encouraging awareness, discussion, action.
Messages:
C Aboriginal title is a real property right
C Existing poverty is directly linked to denial of this right
C Existing policies and processes are not intended to address these fundamental
issuesC Need active support in getting policy changed.
C Need active involvement in exercise of rights and obtaining benefit from Aboriginal
title lands & resources.
C Other?
1.3.2. Step Two: Collect Data to Prove Aboriginal Title.
1.3.2.1. Collect The Relevant Cultural/Historical/Technical Information.
As mentioned above, communities need to be prepared to defend their Aboriginal title and
rights. So, the second step is to collect the historical and cultural information that FirstNations will need to establish their connection to the land, particularly the area of planned
Aboriginal title activity. It is advisable to also collect the technical land and resource
information from the relevant provincial Ministries in the territory, ie. zoning, allocation to
third parties. First Nations may want to start their planned Aboriginal title activities at a site
near their community with "public" road access. The community can then provide logistical
and defensive support more easily.
C Locate all previous cultural/historical studies/maps that have been done about the
Community/Nations' Land Traditions, if there are any. If there aren't any, identify
community members or Elders, that are land users in the area of the site of the
planned Aboriginal title activity. Prepare them to be ready to do an
interview/affidavit in the likely event of legal action by the province.
Special attention should be paid to traditional authorities, tenure systems, and concepts of
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
8/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 7
title.
1.3.2.2. Prepare An Aboriginal Title Plan.
The next step involves gathering all of the cultural/historical and technical information for the
site/area and analyzing it to prepare a Plan for exercising Aboriginal title and rights, as well
as a defensive negotiating/legal position.
C How has the Community/Nation used the area historically and currently (within living
memory = Interviews with18 yr. olds to Elders)?
C Exercise of First Nation authority: obtain documentation from First Nation governing
institutions authorizing the Aboriginal Title activity(ies) ie. signed permit, safety
requirements met, etc.
C Determine the need for an additional security/peace camp at the site of the
Aboriginal title activity, and identify community people to be in charge of the camp.
1.3.2.3. Implement The Aboriginal Title Plan.
The final step is to implement the Aboriginal Title Plan. This is an exciting and liberating partof the experience of exercising lawful Aboriginal title and rights to the lands and resources of
within a First Nations' territory. There are other Communities/Nations that have already started
and can be of assistance. Don't be afraid to ask them for advice.
1.3.3. Traditional Knowledge.
Since the World Earth Summit in Rio 2000 the international community has become more and
more active in creating instruments for environmental protection. One of them is theConvention on Biological Diversity. Article 8j foresees the use of the traditional ecological
knowledge of indigenous and local communities to ensure the in-situ conservation of
biological diversity. Canada is a signatory of this convention and participates in the
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
9/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 8
conferences of the Parties held biannually to ensure the implementation of the convention.
Canada therefore has to provide the funds for the necessary research to collect the traditional
knowledge to ensure the best possible protection of the biological diversity. Indigenous
communities are the holders of this knowledge and should be in enabled to research the
knowledge according to their own research protocols and decide on the disclosure of this
information. This has to go hand in hand with the development of international standards for
the protection of traditional knowledge and intellectual property with respect to indigenous
communities (more on this below).
1.4. External - Non native Institutions.
Public education campaigns often focus on existing networks which are already generally on-
side (for instance, NGOs, social-activist church groups, unions), leaving the tough-sells (ie.,
the right wing, industry, etc) for another day. It is proposed that the public education exercise
associated with DISC focus on both of these broad groups.
1.4.1. Opinion makers.
Over the past ten years, the public policy discourse has increasingly been dominated by neo-
conservative thinkers and institutions, and this in turn has had a significant impact on
government policy and public perceptions. With specific reference to First Nations, these
developments have led to a situation where falsehoods are now often accepted as
conventional wisdom (ie., that Indians are pampered by government; that assimilation is the
final solution; that equality requires one set of laws for all, etc.). These thinkers and
institutions need to be targeted directly and drawn out into a public debate on the issues, to
debunk the myths that they have been generating and force them to defend their assertions.Specific examples: The Fraser Institute; David Frum; Tom Flanagan; Mel Smith; polling
companies; others.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
10/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 9
Methods: Op-ed pieces; public debates; published materials or rebuttals; open letters; radio
talk shows. Could organize a conference/symposium, similar to the one which the Fraser
Institute did last year on Delgamuukw. Involve media and commentators.
Messages:
C Authentic equality requires recognition of Aboriginal property rights.
C Highlight racist elements of the prevailing neo-con analysis. Put them on the defensive.
C Highlight the connection between prevailing social conditions and denial of access to
lands & resources - economic racism.
C Recognizing Aboriginal title will be of benefit to all Canadians.
1.4.2. Support Groups.
NGOs (ie., the Council of Canadians, Canadian Labour Conference, unions). With particular
reference to the unions, efforts should be made to link the Aboriginal title issue to the
International Labour Organizations (ILO) Convention on Indigenous Peoples rights.
Environmentalists (where appropriate). Service clubs (ie., Lions, Kiwanis, Rotary). More detailto follow - identify support groups in consultation with AFN staff and DISC.
1.4.3. Religious Institutions.
Generally, efforts focus on existing networks, in particular Christian ones such as the
Aboriginal Rights Coalition (which represents many of the mainstream, socially-left churches)
and the Canadian Council of Catholic Bishops. Among the Christian churches, this leaves out
many of the Evangelical denominations, which have not generally been as active on socialjustice issues, and which the Alliance/Reform regards as a recruiting ground. Efforts should
be made to use existing alliances with ARC, etc., to begin a public education process with
these other churches.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
11/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 10
Another factor which will affect this aspect of the public education initiative is fallout from the
residential school claims. Already, The Anglican Church is taking seriously about bankruptcy
of its national office and individual diocese. The Roman Catholic and United Churches are
feeling many of the same pressures. This ongoing uncertainty will have an impact on how they
respond to any requests for assistance, and needs to be considered.
Jewish institutions should also be approached (more on this below under International
campaign).
As well, there are other faiths which have been growing in numbers over the past decade,
which have a large infrastructure, and which are becoming important in terms of shapingpublic policy. The Moslem faith, and particularly in BC, Hindus and Sikhs, need to be
considered as well.
Methods: Meetings at national, regional, local level. Seek letters, resolutions of support, active
political support.
1.4.4. Business.
Acknowledging that government policy is heavily influenced by the expectations and
imperatives of the corporate sector, and economic considerations, a keystone of this strategic
approach is to target Canadas economy, in order to heighten the uncertainty which
Delgamuukwand related events have created, and to highlight the economic deprivation of
First Nations under the status quo.
Corporations and companies who take profits from unceded lands and resources need to be
advised of the potential consequences of their actions, and their support for policy changesought.
C Companies: It may be that specific companies within each sector (ie., mining, timber,
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
12/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 11
the fishery) should be targeted as a priority in the initial phase. An alternative would be
to target specific companies in each region. Major financial institutions - especially the
banks - should also be dealt with in this connection.
In addition to entering into dialogue with management, attention should also focus on
their shareholders, particularly institutional investors who often hold large chunks of
stock and as a result wield significant influence.
C Industry groups: As well, industry groups (ie., the Canadian Mining Association,
Canadian Pulp & Paper Association, COFI, etc.) provide an opportunity to maximize
exposure.
C Umbrella groups: Finally, umbrella groups - in particular the Business Council on
National Issues, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, and the Canadian Federation
of Municipalities - should also be singled out for attention.
Messages:
C Aboriginal title is a legal proprietary interest which exists regardless of whether it is
recognized as a matter of federal policy.
C This interest represents a lien on lands and resources which is not reflected on the
balance sheets of these companies - in other words, they have been borrowing money
and issuing shares, without disclosing this liability.
C Non-recognition of Aboriginal title also translates into an invisible subsidy since it is
not factored in as a cost of doing business, and, in the context of international trade,
amounts to an unfair business practise.C CCP must change to reflect these realities. Seeking support from companies to press
for policy change.
C Regardless, companies will be needing to consider changes to their existing practises,
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
13/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 12
and changes to the way they do business. They can be part of the solution or part of the
problem.
Methods: Notices prepared and sent out. Meetings with Boards of Directors/CEOs. Letters
to major shareholders/institutional investors. Advertisements in media (particularly trade
publications)
1.4.5. Media.
-Identify key messages (simple, consistent)
-identify spokes-people-monitoring & assessment
-Interviews
-meetings with editorial boards
-letters to editor
-op-ed pieces
-purchase advertising
1.4.6. Legal organizations.
Liaison with the Indigenous Bar Association, Canadian Bar Association, Law Reform
Commission, the judiciary. [Needs further discussion.]
1.4.7. The General Canadian Public.
Given the reality of scarce resources, it may be best at this stage to deploy resources
strategically at the key groups already outlined above. If successful, these efforts will inevitablyspill over into the public discourse. It is recommended that the AFNs efforts in the initial phase
focus primarily on the target groups identified above. General information materials (in the
form of a pamphlet) could be prepared for distribution to the general public.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
14/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 13
Could organize public forums/town hall meetings.
1.5. Responsibilities.
Need to sort our roles & responsibilities between AFN media directorate and DISC technical
committee. Identify potential linkages with other AFN programs.
-drafting/development of materials
-production and dissemination of information
-identification and confirmation of specific contact people, organizations under each heading
-identify and select target corporations/sectors-scheduling of events
-follow up
1.6. Time Lines.
Aspects of this work (ie., insert in the AFN Messenger, dialogue with Church groups, press
releases) have already begun. Upon approval of the overall six-point strategy, begin the
development of materials, identification of specific targets (ie., industrial sectors, companies),and implementation. Phase I: June - July. Phase II: August - December.
1.7. Assessment/Adjustment.
Periodic assessments by technical working group and DISC. Adjustments as required.
1.8. Costs.
???
1.9. Other Considerations.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
15/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 14
???
2. POLITICAL/NEGOTIATION/PRE-LITIGATION.
As directed by Resolutions 5/99 and 7/00, the AFN has invited the federal government of work
jointly on a process of policy review, first through a panel of experts, and then through
mediated negotiations. (See proposal to Canada, May 9/00, attached). Greg Gauld, Director
General of Comprehensive and Major Claims, committed to having a response from the
federal government by May 31st, but as of this writing (June 12th), federal officials have
secured no direction and provided no response to the AFNs proposals. Based on past
experience, it can be expected that Canada will stall or avoid a concrete response. Additionalpressure will need to be exerted - in terms of the other 5 points of this strategy, as well as
continued attempts at negotiation.
Keeping in mind the potential for litigation, it will be important to have as much of a paper trail
as possible. Therefore, the federal response should be in letter form, and as specific as
possible. Detailed and accurate records of all meetings and telephone calls with federal
officials should be kept and circulated.
2.1. Targets.
Once the federal response is assessed, the political/negotiation aspect of this item will need
to be revisited, revised if necessary, and implemented. Specific Departments, agencies, and
elected leaders/governments should be targeted as a part of a lobby effort to get them to re-
think their refusal to review and change the CCP. At minimum, it should include:
C
Key Ministers: as above, DOJ, Indian Affairs, Finance, Treasury Board, etc. IncludeMinisters who chair key Cabinet Committees and members of those committees.
C Political staff of key ministers: DOJ, PCO, Indian Affairs, Finance, Treasury Board, to
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
16/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 15
get the message through to their masters.
C Senior officials at DOJ, PCO, PMO, Indian Affairs, Finance, Treasury Board. This
dialogue needs to be at least at the level of ADM/Deputy. Include senior committees
(committee of Deputies; interdepartmental committee on CCP (ADM level). Officials
who we have dealt with to date simply do not have the authority or influence required
to obtain movement.
C Members of Parliament: Lobby key MPs, including chairmen of critical Standing
Committees (Justice, International Trade, Finance) and members of those standing
committees. Not necessary to lobby all MPs at this time.
C Opposition parties: The utility of expending energy on the opposition parties needs to
be discussed and assessed. The Tories are weak. The Alliance is hostile and not likely
to alter a fundamental aspect of its policy platform (ie., Anti-Indian rights) in the middle
of a leadership campaign. The NDP is marginal. The Bloc, however, particularly with
respect to its influence over federal policy as it applies to Quebec, may be one
opposition party which should be an area of focus. At the Fraser Institute forum on
Delgamuukwlast year, the BQ Indian Affairs critic, Claude Bachand, publicly indicatedthat the BQ supports implementation ofDelgamuukw, including recognition of title and
compensation for past infringement.
C Federal Auditor General: In his 1998 Annual Report, the Auditor General focussed, in
part, on the CCP from a process perspective, and raised a number of questions which
later received additional consideration from the Standing Committee on Aboriginal
Affairs and the Standing Committee on Public Accounts. The Department was told that
it had not provided accurate evidence to support its assertion that CCP settlementsactually resulted in economic benefits. It was also told that it needed to provide an
accurate valuation of lands under claim. The Department undertook to respond to
these issues. Contact should be made with the Auditor Generals office to identify and
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
17/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 16
address the AFNs concerns regarding the CCP from a policy perspective.
C Provincial governments: Begin the process of advancing the awareness of key
provincial governments. They can be expected to press the federal government for
policy change if they can see that it is in their interests. B.C., Quebec, and the Atlantic
provinces are key.
2.2. Responsibility.
Coordination by AFN National Office. Participation by DISC members and technical team.
Interventions with individual provincial governments by nations from within those provinces.
2.3. Time Lines.
With Parliament soon breaking for summer recess, and the distinct possibility of a fall election,
it may be difficult to implement all aspects of this item before the AFN GA. At the very least,
work with more senior officials can begin, and individual MPs/Ministers can be approached
through their constituency offices. Needs discussion.
2.4. Costs.
Needs discussion.
3. LITIGATION.
See budget proposal from Nahwegahbow, Nadjiwan, Corbiere, to Audrey Mayes, dated 23
May 2000. Implementation to await finalization of the preparatory work.
4. POLICY DEVELOPMENT.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
18/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 17
This is an important area of activity. It is easy to attack the CCP, but ultimately workable
alternatives are going to have to be advanced, subjected to outside scrutiny, and negotiated.
It is better that this work begin taking place now rather than later.
Considerable work on alternatives to existing policy has already been done - notably, the final
report and recommendations of RCAP (as well as the associated policy papers), and Judge
Hamiltons report on alternatives to extinguishment. These materials form a solid base from
which to build.
However, existing AFN resolutions also provide some additional guidance in terms of policy
directions. Specifically, they refer to the standards, principles and process outlined by theSCC inDelgamuukw(neither RCAP nor judge Hamilton had the benefit of this guidance from
the SCC when they prepared their reports & recommendations).
Finally, discussion in the DISC has also identified existing and emerging human rights
standards and covenants as another basis for policy development.
TheDelgamuukwReview & Education initiative, headed by Satsan, has also been conducting
research which may be relevant to this aspect of the 6 point strategy. To date, their research
has focussed on the legal aspects ofDelgamuukw. Draft copies of these reports need to be
obtained and reviewed, to see how their contents might be applied to the work at hand.
Beyond legal research, Satsan has also suggested activity related to policy development. In
particular, a paper prepared by Satsans office, Supporting AFNs National Initiative
Regarding Recognition and Affirmation of Aboriginal Title: Policy Analysis and Research
(April 10, 2000), proposes six potential subjects for policy development and analysis, with the
stated objective of assisting the DISC in its work.
There are some useful points raised in the April 10 document, but it does not fully reflect the
discussions which have taken place within the DISC. The six proposed projects contained in
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
19/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 18
that paper have been considered in connection with the preparation of this section of this
document, and elements of them are reflected in the proposed activities which follow.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
20/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 19
4.1. Research Projects/Policy Papers.
4.1.1. The CC Policy and Process.
Describe and analyse the existing CC policy, measured against the standards set out in
Delgamuukw and International Covenants. Also take into account the RCAP
recommendations.
Describe and analyse the existing CC process, and its regional variations, measured against
the standards set out in Delgamuukwand International Covenants.
Critique the policy and the process in light of the analysis, identifying particular problem areas.
This work would include a specific section on extinguishment, building on the work of RCAP
and Judge Hamilton.
4.1.2. Recognition and Affirmation Policy/Process.
This paper (or series of papers) would build on the preceding one, using the analysis to
develop options and approaches for a new policy and process, including affirmation &
recognition vs. extinguishment, as well as co-jurisdiction and co-management.
It would also include a consideration of jurisdiction (self-government and intergovernmental
relations), fiscal relations, and the federal governments s 91(24) responsibilities, including
its fiduciary duties.
4.1.3. Economic Analysis.
Needless to say, there are important economic issues directly related to Aboriginal title and
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
21/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 20
its recognition. Each of these need to be identified and assessed to inform the
implementation of the six-point strategy, and to develop articulate and defensible policy
alternatives. This item requires more discussion, but here are some ideas:
4.1.3.1. Value of Unextinguished Aboriginal Lands & Resources.
The SCC stated in Delgamuukw that Aboriginal title is a proprietary interest, including
exclusive use of lands and resources. The purpose of this work would be to identify some
criteria and provide some parameters for attaching a value (or range of values) to
unextinguished Aboriginal title lands & resources in Canada. Obviously, these would only be
estimates, and subject to a number of assumptions. However, the result would be of great
benefit in connection with public education, the international campaign, and related research
items connected with the national accounts (see below). A possible sub-project under this one
would be to also estimate the value of resources taken out of unextinguished Aboriginal title
lands annually (ie., timber, minerals, hydro, fish & wildlife, etc.).
4.1.3.2. National Accounts.
Canadas national accounts do not take into account the liabilities arising from unextinguished
Aboriginal title or claims related to such title. Apparently, outstanding First Nation rights or
claims only show up as contingent liabilities when they are being litigated. In any event,
Canadas national accounts are supposed to accurately reflect the state of the countrys
books, because they influence many aspects of fiscal and monetary policy, and they also
influence the credit ratings fixed by bond rating agencies. The method for calculating and
presenting Canadas national accounts is now apparently under review, so the timing may be
opportune.
The point of this work would include:
C find out more specifics about how the national accounts are calculated and presented;
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
22/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 21
C determine what if any steps are being taken to revise the way they are calculated
C provide some estimates of what the national accounts would look like if they reflected
the actual cost of unextinguished Aboriginal lands and resources as a Crown liability.
C Identify potential implications for Canadas bond rating, etc.
A similar exercise could also be undertaken for selected provincial public accounts (in
particular, B.C., Quebec, the Atlantic).
4.1.3.4. Corporate Accounts.
Applying the same reasoning from the previous point to corporate accounting practises, what
impact does the reality of Aboriginal title have on the balance books of major resource
extraction companies? The existence of Aboriginal title as a legal interest stands to affect their
security of tenure, supply, stock valuation, cost of borrowing, etc. [Also identify issues re:
WTO/NAFTA rules & hidden subsidies/unfair competition...]
4.1.3.5. Other.
There are other economic issues which need to be fleshed out. This should occur throughdiscussions with the technical team, DISC members, and AFN staff from relevant programs.
One possibility is an impact/benefits assessment of recognition of title.
4.1.4. Formation of Public Opinion.
Governments, media and companies rely on polling to gauge public opinion and this in turn
has an influence on public policy and debate. Although many pollsters ask questions related
to Aboriginal title and claims, it is clear that the results they get are distorted by the generalpublics ignorance of First Nation rights and history. In this connection, it may be useful to
commission some work which would provide more insight into how public opinion is formed,
and how pollsters gather their information and analyse the results. The objective would be, in
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
23/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 22
part, to see if there is a basis for challenging the results of polls which suggest that Canadians
are against Aboriginal title. Needs discussion.
4.2. Responsibility.
It is proposed that the terms of reference for these projects be developed by the DISC
technical team in conjunction with AFN staff. Contractors should be identified to carry out the
research in consultation with AFN staff and the technical team. With respect to the economic
component, the actual work should be done by staff or contractors who have a firm grasp of
economics, valuation, and government & corporate accounting practises.
As already mentioned, this work needs to be closely coordinated with Satsans Research and
Education initiative, to avoid duplication, and to ensure that the work which is done meets the
precise needs and objectives of DISC.
4.3. Time Lines.
Work to begin as soon as possible, particularly because implementation of other elements
of the 6-point strategy will rely heavily on this research (ie., international campaign, publiceducation).
4.4. Costs.
To be determined.
5. DIRECT ACTION/EXERCISE OF ABORIGINAL TITLE & RIGHTS.
The exercise and assertion of Aboriginal title is at the heart of the 6-point strategy. Being a
collective right that lies with the nation and the community, it is up to the people themselves
to initiate actions which reflect the exercise of their rights to, and jurisdiction over, their land
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
24/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 23
and resources.
5.1. Objective.
To support, and, when requested, to assist the First Nations, their communities and citizens,
to continue (and resume) using and benefiting from their Aboriginal title lands and resources
to the fullest extent possible, in an organized and disciplined way. These activities will also
need to be linked to other components of this six point strategy, as it should be expected
Crown governments and third parties will challenge First Nations in the exercise of their
Aboriginal title and rights.
5.2. Defending the Exercise Aboriginal Title.
Although the Supreme Court of Canadas Delgamuukwdecision judicially recognizes that
Aboriginal title exists in Canada, and that it is a right to the land itself, the Court stopped short
of actually applying these conclusions to a specific nation or specific piece of territory. In an
effort to further delay the recognition of Aboriginal title, and to limit potential Crown liabilities
for unjustified infringements of Aboriginal title, the federal and provincial governments have
taken the position that the assertion of Aboriginal title by a particular First Nation, to a
particular tract of land, is not sufficient. From the federal-provincial perspective, a First Nation
must first prove Aboriginal title in court, to a particular tract of land, before the federal and/or
provincial governments will recognize the existence of Aboriginal title on the ground.
Therefore, when First Nations exercise their Aboriginal title and rights on the ground, it is likely
that provincial and/or federal governments will drag First Nations, their communities, and their
citizens, into court, probably through injunction proceedings.
In order to defend themselves from provincial and/or federal legal attacks, where possible,
First Nations should professionally document and substantiate their current and historic
connection to their lands. Ideally, as a first step, map biographies should be collected from
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
25/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 24
each land user (First Nations Citizen), 18 years old up to the Elders. Otherwise, affidavits from
Elders and other land users can be used in court.
These map biographies can then help First Nation communities and citizens, identify as a
priority, within their Aboriginal title territories, their current use areas. Then important cultural
or wildlife/plant harvesting sites can be identified within the current use area to be protected
on an immediate basis.
The historic connection to the land can be documented through Elders Oral history interviews
as well as, archival records, genealogy, archaeological studies, and historical maps.
It is recommended that First Nations seek legal and professional advice when preparing to
exercise Aboriginal title and rights on the ground. The federal and/or provincial governments
typically use the courts, police and/or military to challenge First Nations Aboriginal title and
rights (ie. Lubicon, Oka, Ipperwash and Gustafson Lake).
If challenged, First Nations should be able to establish through oral history, maps etc., a clear
connection to the lands/sites/areas where an Aboriginal title activity has traditionally been
conducted or is currently planned. (See above re: community participation and publiceducation).
It is fair to say that First Nations will likely be challenged by Crown governments, or third party
interests, as First Nations continue (or return) to use, occupy and possess their Aboriginal title
territories. Over decades and centuries, the Crown governments have unjustifiably given out
interests to third parties in all regions of Canada subject to Aboriginal title. Forestry and
fisheries are prominent examples of conflict between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal peoples
over resource allocation.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
26/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 25
5.3. Exercising Aboriginal Title and Rights on the Ground.
A number of steps need to be considered before First Nations go out and exercise Aboriginal
title and rights on the ground.
The first step is to organize the people. This starts with the community, but if possible, First
Nation communities should try and work together with other communities from the First Nation
at the level of a Tribal Council, or similar Tribal organization.
The next step involves planning and preparation, including the seeking authority from the
community or nation, physical setting, communications, media relations, security, 3 rd parties,etc. Specific activities flowing from this will be the subject of subsequent informational
materials developed by DISC, in the form of a how-To guide for community use.
5.4. Supporting Role of AFN National Office.
As the Delgamuukwdecision acknowledged, Aboriginal title is collectively held by the
members of a First Nation. The responsibility for exercising and defending a First Nations
Aboriginal title and rights falls to all of the citizens of a First Nation, in accordance with their
own traditions and laws.
Consequently, the role of the Assembly of First Nations in implementing this component of the
six point strategy shall be a supporting one, responding to requests, through monitoring,
advice and advocacy. The AFN-DISC and the AFN-Executive Committee will jointly be
implementing this six point strategy at the national level. It is up to regional First Nation
organizations to take responsibility for clarifying their supporting role to assist First Nations
in the exercise and defence of their Aboriginal title and rights.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
27/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 26
5.5. Responsibility.
As already stated, it will be up to the First Nations themselves, and their members, to exercise
their Aboriginal title and rights. AFN staff and DISC technical team could be made available
to provide technical support upon request. Materials generated by DISC and the National
Office (particularly re: public education) can be provided to First Nations. DISC members and
the National Office can also provide assistance through press releases, participation at
events, etc.
5.6. Time Lines.
Immediate/short term implementation.
5.7. Cost.
Includes travel, human resources, production and distribution of materials.
6. INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN.
Canada prides itself for taking a lead role in building international organizations and legal
instruments, such as most recently the establishment of an International Criminal Court. Those
initiatives not only impose international obligations, they should also become part of the
national agenda regarding human and indigenous rights. Other nations look to the policies of
the Canadian government as parameters for their own dealings with indigenous peoples. This
imposes an obligation on the government and indigenous nations in Canada to ensure that
their national legislation and policies not only meet international standards, but actually
impose higher standards which then shape international policy.
As important, international pressure should be used as a means of compelling Canada to
change domestic policy, but this needs to be done on a number of levels, and with a number
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
28/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 27
of targets. There are three main pressure points to consider: (i) human rights, (ii) economics
and trade (including the environment) and (iii) inherent indigenous rights and title
6.1. Themes.
6.1.1. Human Rights.
The Human Rights committee of the UN has already concluded that elements of the CPP are
incompatible with Article 1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights, which guarantees that a people should not be denied their means of subsistence. The
same committee also raised major concerns about Canadas apparent unwillingness toaddress the aspects of the RCAP recommendations which talk about the restitution of lands
and resources. Continued imposition of the CCP is a violation of Aboriginal peoples
fundamental human rights, as guaranteed by UN Covenants to which Canada is a party. In this
sense, the CCP represents a direct form of economic racism.
6.1.2. Economics, Trade and Environmental Law.
6.1.2.1 Unfair Trading Practises.
By not recognizing Aboriginal title as a real legal interest in the land, Canada provides a
hidden subsidy to resource extraction companies, since their costs do not have to reflect the
Aboriginal interest in the land, or compensation for infringement. This should be regarded as
an unfair trading practise, since it puts these companies at an advantage when competing
with others.
6.1.2.2. Misleading Accounts.
Canadas national accounts do not accurately reflect the Aboriginal title interest of the
indigenous peoples, since they are not on the balance sheet as a liability. This provides a
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
29/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 28
misleadingly healthy picture of Canadas fiscal health. Existing credit ratings, confidence in
bond issues, etc., need to be re-assessed as a result.
For corporations too, the same arguments apply. The fact that their tenure and source of
supply are not secure is not reflected in their balance books. This has an impact on their
creditworthiness, their liabilities, and their stock values.
6.1.2.3. Environmental and Social Consequences.
Indigenous peoples are the first to experience and suffer from the environmental and social
impact of the exploitation of their traditional lands and resources by the various actors,
especially big multinational firms. They maintain a very close and intimate relationship with
their land and feel an obligation to protect it for all future generations. Their role in the
protection of the environment has been recognized in a number of legal and policy
instruments, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, whose Article 8j foresees the
use of the traditional knowledge of local and indigenous communities in the in-situ
conservation of biological diversity. Indigenous peoples have been actively involved in the
United Nations Environmental Program, the UN Commission on Sustainable Development,
but have not yet been given full participation rights.
In particular, international negotiations concerning international trade liberalization are often
held behind closed doors, excluding indigenous and local populations who experience the
negative impacts on the social and natural environment first. Indigenous groups are therefore
intensifying their cooperation with environmental groups to ensure that their concerns are
taken seriously by the international and the business community.
6.1.3. Inherent Indigenous Rights and Title.
The special status of indigenous peoples has to be recognized under international law. As the
traditional owners of the land they have the right to self-determination. Aboriginal title in a
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
30/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 29
broader sense not only encompasses land and resource rights - it also means exercising
jurisdiction over the land and people. Aboriginal title coexists with Crown title on all levels,
resulting in a situation of legal pluralism. Many Latin American constitutions recognize legal
pluralism and the coexistence of indigenous and traditional jurisdictions. By linking that
approach to the concept of Aboriginal title, new spaces can be created to ensure that
indigenous peoples can participate as equal partners in the national economy and politics.
6.2. Targets.
6.2.1. Other Governments.
Through their embassies in Canada and their delegations to international institutions (ie.,
United Nations, European Union, OSCE, etc.). Also the European parliament can be asked
to take a position on current Canadian policy, politically enforcing its obligations under
international law to bring those policies up to the international standard.
6.2.2. Human and Indigenous Rights Forums.
6.2.2.1 Governments and International Organizations
United Nations: Economic & Social Council:
C Commission on Human Rights: Working Groups on a Permanent Forum for Indigenous
Peoples and on the Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples)
C Sub-Commission on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination
C Working Group on Indigenous Populations (WGIP)
Other UN agencies and sister organizations:
C UN Commission on Sustainable Development
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
31/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 30
C United Nations Environmental Programme (Convention on Biological Diversity)
C International Labor Organization (reports on the implementation ofConvention 169 on
the rights of Indigenous and Tribal Populations, which Canada has yet to ratify.)
C World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (Roundtable on Indigenous Peoples
and Intellectual Property)
United States government: Have input into their annual Human Rights Report on Canada.
Liaison with the National Congress of American Indians; members of the US Congress and
Congressional committees.
Organization of American States.
6.2.2.2. Non Governmental Organizations.
6.2.2.2.1. Human Rights Field.
Helsinki Watch - European based human rights organization
The World Jewish Congress - Headquartered in New York, the WJC has done significant work
regarding the restitution of property stolen in Europe during WWII.
TheBnai Brith is another Jewish human rights organization, which has under its umbrella the
Institute for International Affairs and the League for Human Rights, both of which are dedicated
to uncovering and remedying human rights abuses.
Other???
http://www.ihf-hr.org/index.htmhttp://www.ihf-hr.org/index.htmhttp://www.virtual.co.il/orgs/orgs/wjc/http://www.virtual.co.il/orgs/orgs/wjc/http://www.bnaibrith.ca/nfindex.htmhttp://www.bnaibrith.ca/nfindex.htmhttp://www.bnaibrith.ca/nfindex.htmhttp://www.virtual.co.il/orgs/orgs/wjc/http://www.ihf-hr.org/index.htm -
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
32/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 31
6.2.2.2.2. Indigenous Rights Field.
Support groups of indigenous rights: In Europe groups like: Society for Threatened Peoples
(Austria, Germany, Italy), Big Mountain Action Group, Incomindios, etc.
Networks for indigenous groups:
C Worldwide: organizations like the International Indian Treaty Council, etc.
C Regional Representations: COICA (Indigenous Peoples of the Amazon), etc.
C Local Alliances: of indigenous groups in all parts of the world
6.2.3. Economic Sector.
Strategic interventions at key economic and trade institutions and bond rating agencies.
TheWorld Trade Organization (WTO);
The World Bank (Operational Directive 4.1. on Indigenous Peoples);
International Monetary Fund (IMF) ;NAFTA; other.
Indigenous groups should oppose all free trade agreements unless Aboriginal proprietary
interest is dealt with, because those agreements will directly impact indigenous lands. In the
future free trade agreements should foresee special provisions protecting indigenous
interests, based on their legal position and their cultural identity. Some international
agreements already integrate exemptions regarding cultural property and identity, but not with
respect to indigenous peoples.
Also those concepts are strongly disputed, indigenous peoples have maintained their cultural
identity despite the impact of mainstream culture and have defended the concept in the courts.
They should therefore be integrated and made instrumental in the process of developing the
http://www.wto.org/http://www.wto.org/http://www.wto.org/http://www.worldbank.org/http://www.worldbank.org/http://www.worldbank.org/http://www.imf.org/http://www.imf.org/http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/http://www.nafta-sec-alena.org/http://www.imf.org/http://www.worldbank.org/http://www.wto.org/ -
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
33/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 32
concept of cultural identity on the international level.
Bond rating agencies: These are the bodies which assess the credit-worthiness of
corporations and nation states, and they wield significant influence in the international
marketplace. Two of the premier bond rating agencies are Standard & Poor, andMoodys.
Consider the application and extension of strategic boycotts in particular sectors.
Another group to consider under this heading is the G7 group of developed countries.
6.2.4. Environmental Sector.
Indigenous peoples as the traditional owners of the land and the holders of Aboriginal title and
traditional ecological knowledge have a vital interest in the conservation of the environment
for all future generations. In this initiative they can closely cooperate, to the extent that their
aims correspond, with the scientific community in conducting the necessary research and the
environmental protection network.
Also, involvement in certification campaigns, ie., Forestry Stewardship Council
6.2.5. Network for Inherent Indigenous Rights and Title.
6.2.5.1. Academic network.
Research on legal concepts similar to Aboriginal Title
C
Native Title in AustraliaC Coexisting Jurisdictions: European Union
Organize international conferences with experts in the field of inherent Aboriginal rights and
http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/http://www.moodys.com/http://www.moodys.com/http://www.moodys.com/http://www.moodys.com/http://www.standardandpoors.com/ratings/ -
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
34/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 33
title to land, resources, traditional knowledge and sustainable development
6.2.5.2. Indigenous Peoples Network.
Link indigenous peoples all over the world with similar concerns about the protection of their
original rights to the national alliance in support of Aboriginal title. Start international
communication efforts in different languages to promote and diffuse the concept of Aboriginal
title as a collective proprietary interest among indigenous peoples. This would include linking
up with the different support networks and the international media (including Aboriginal media)
to create awareness.
6.2.6. Other. ????
6.3. Responsibilities.
Roles and responsibilities should be worked out between technical working group and AFN
staff. At the political level, duties can be shared out between AFN Executive, DISC members,
other nations.
6.4. Time Lines.
To begin immediately. Need to sit down and see schedule of events, timing, itinerary,
preparation of background materials.
6.5. Cost. ????
E. LINKAGES TO OTHER AFN PROCESSES.
There are a number of existing AFN processes which need to be considered in connection
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
35/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 34
with the DISC strategy. It will be important to maximize use of existing resources and
expertise, and to avoid duplication.
The technical team should work with AFN staff to identify potential areas for cooperation and
prepare a detailed listing. What follows are some preliminary thoughts.
Delgamuukw Research & Education Initiative.
As already highlighted in other parts of this document, this needs to be worked out, particularly
with regard to the public education and policy development components of this strategy.
Treaty Implementation Process.
The AFN already has a treaty process underway, with a focus on implementation of existing
treaties. Although the immediate objectives of the DISC are different, it will be important to
identify common issues and map out a plan for coordinating closely on those. Technical
liaison should occur ASAP.
Specific Claims/CCC.
For the last number of years, the CCC has focussed on much-needed reform of the federal
Specific Claims policy. The DISC has already made use of many of the lessons learned
through the JTF experience. It will be important for the two committees to coordinate their work
and continue to share experiences.
Fiscal Relations.
The fiscal implications of a recognition and affirmation policy are obvious, which strongly
suggests the need for linkages with this process. Needs discussion.
-
7/28/2019 Aboriginal Title Implementation Strategy - 2000
36/36
AFN DISC Six-Point Strategy - Discussion paper Draft #3 - June 12, 2000. 35
Other AFN Programs.
Media relations. Economic Development. Other?
ATTACHMENTS.
-AFN AGA Resolution 5/99
-AFN Confederacy Resolution 7/00
-AFN Proposal to Canada, 9 May 2000
-Budget proposal from Nahwegahbow, Nadjiwan, Corbiere, to Audrey Mayes, 23 May 2000.
-Satsans office: Supporting AFNs National Initiative Regarding Recognition and Affirmation
of Aboriginal Title: Policy Analysis and Research (April 10, 2000)