a wastewater-based epidemiological study of licit and
TRANSCRIPT
A wastewater-based epidemiological study of licit and illicit drugs among schoolchildren and students in Slovenia
Ivona Krizman-Matasić1, Taja Verovšek2,3, Ada Hočevar Grom4, Urška Blaznik4, Andreja Drev4 and Ester Heath2,3
1 Rudjer Boškovic Institute, Bijenicka 54, Zagreb, Croatia2Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, Ljubljana, Slovenia3Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova 39, Ljubljana, Slovenia4National Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Wastewater samples (n=42):• 20 primary schools,
15 secondary schools,*12 centres for higher education.
• 37 institutions in urban area, 10 institutions in rural area.
THE AIM OF THE STUDY
Application of wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) to different Slovenian educational bodies to:• Investigate licit and illicit drug consumption trends based on:
• Institutions’ educational level: primary schools, secondary schools, centres for higher education• Geographic location: seven Slovenian municipalities• Level of urbanity: urban, rural
• Compare results obtained by our study and by traditionally used epidemiological methods (European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD), Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) survey)
PARTICIPATION
METHOD AND RESULT HIGHLIGHTS
Table 1 List of selected licit and illicit drugs and their biomarkers (n=19)
Fig. 1 Number of samples obtained per municipality Fig. 2 Number of samples regarding institutions’ educational level per municipality
RESULTS
General findings
• Commonly detected biomarkers: nicotine, cannabis, alcohol, cocaine (COC and BE)
• None detected: heroin biomarker (6-AM), methadone biomarkers (MTHD, EDDP)
• Biomarkers per sample: 4 to 12 (modus: 7)
REFERENCES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Spatial variation Variation based on educational level
Comparison of the findings: WBE – traditional epidemiological methods
• Urban areas have higher detection rates (exceptions: MAMP, AMP)
• Biomarkers detected per sample: similar for urban and rural areas (modus: 7)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Det
ecti
on
rat
e (%
)
Rural Urban
Fig. 5 Detection rate (%) of biomarkers in samples from urban and rural areas
* 2 schools offering secondary and higher education
Trends in urban and rural areas
• Most commonly detected biomarkers: nicotine, cannabis, alcohol
• Other commonly detected biomarkers: COC (Cities: 1,3, 4, 7), MOR (Cities: 2, 5 ,6), MDMA (City 4), COD (City 2)
• Stimulants: AMP (only in City 1), MAMP (in Cities: 1, 4, 5, 6), MDMA (in Cities: 1, 7)
• Biomarkers per sample: highest in City 1 (modus: 11)
• Most commonly detected biomarkers: nicotine, cannabis, cocaine (COC)
• Most commonly detected biomarkers in samples of centres for higher education: BE, MOR
• Detection rates of biomarkers increase with the level of education
• Lower number of biomarkers detected in samples from primary schools than in samples from secondary schools and centres for higher education
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Det
ecti
on
rat
e (%
)
City 1 City 2 City 3 City 4 City 5 City 6 City 7
Fig. 4 Detection rate (%) of biomarkers in different municipalities
• Sample selection: headmasters/deans approval, evaluation of sampling possibility• Sampling campaign: Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday, over class period – one 7-h composite wastewater sample
per school• Sampling difficulties: Physical boundaries of the sewer - some samples (n=5) contain wastewater from more than
one wastewater point-source• Analysis1,2,3: filtration, extraction and pre-concentration of analytes (illicit drugs) or direct injection (nicotine and
alcohol biomarkers), separation and detection of selected urinary biomarkers (n=19) by LC-MS/MS
Drug Selected biomarker(s)
Basic drugs
Cocaine Cocaine (COC), benzoylecgonine (BE), cocaethylene (COE)
Amphetamine Amphetamine (AMP)
Methamphetamine Methamphetamine (MAMP)
Ecstasy 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)
Heroin Morphine (MOR), morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM)
Codeine Codeine (COD)
Methadone Methadone (MTHD), 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP)
Cannabinoids
THC 11-Nor-9-carboxy-THC (THC-COOH), 1-Hydroxy-THC (THC-OH)
Tobacco
Nicotine Nicotine (NIC), cotinine (COT), trans-3‘-hydroxycotinine (HCOT)
Alcohol
Ethanol Ethyl sulphate (EtS), ethyl glucuronide (EtG)
• Results of WBE agree with the latest traditional epidemiological study - European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD) and the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) project
• Licit drugs: the highest consumption was found to be consumption of licit drugs (tobacco, alcohol)
• Illicit drugs: cannabis is the most common illicit drug
• Stimulants: cocaine the most prevalent
Sampling and wastewater analysis
[1] I. Senta, I. Krizman, M. Ahel, et al. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2013, 405: 3255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6720-9[2] F. Y. Lai, C. Gartner, W. Hall, et al. Addiction. 2018, 113: 1127–1136. doi:10.1111/add.14157[3] T. Rodríguez-Álvarez, R. Rodil, R. Cela, et al. J. Chromatogr. A. 2014, 1328:35– 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.12.076
Research was supported by ARRS Program group P1-0143 and applicative project L1-9191
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
No conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Number of samples obtained per municipality
Nu
mb
er o
f th
e m
un
icip
alit
y
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Nu
mb
er o
f th
e m
un
icip
alit
y
Primary Secondary Centres for higher education
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Det
ecti
on
rat
e (%
)
Fig. 3 Detection rate (%) of biomarkers in obtained samples