a state perspective on performance management and planning

18
A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning by Deb Miller, Kansas DOT Secretary National Forum on Performance Based Planning Dallas - September 2010

Upload: keisha

Post on 14-Feb-2016

50 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning. by Deb Miller , Kansas DOT Secretary. National Forum on Performance Based Planning Dallas - September 2010. Emergence of performance measures led to formation of the Standing Committee on Performance Management (SCOPM). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

A State Perspectiveon Performance Management and Planning

by Deb Miller, Kansas DOT Secretary

National Forum on Performance Based PlanningDallas - September 2010

Page 2: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

Emergence of performance measures led to formation of the

Standing Committee on Performance Management

(SCOPM)

Page 3: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

8 Task Forces were assigned to look at performance measures in specific areas:

SafetyPreservationCongestionEnvironmentSystem OperationsFreight/Economic DevelopmentComparative Performance MeasuresPlanning and Programming Process

Page 4: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

The Task Force has hosted two events

Page 5: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

It’s easy to get distractedas to why it won’t work

But we need more

data!!!

Page 6: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

…a performance-based approach is appropriate

…a national performance-based approach is coming

…DOTs and MPOs need to have a strong voice at the table

We hold these truths

to be self evident…

Page 7: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

Nine Workshop Themes and Ideas

Page 8: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

1.States and Local Agencies

should have a rolein setting targets

Page 9: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

2.State and local

politics must be accommodated

Page 10: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

3.There must be a balance

between data-drivenand qualitative decisions

Page 11: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

4.Performance measures should

be used to report progresstowards national goals – and they should roll up

to the national level

Page 12: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

5.ARRA can serve as a pilot

for what works in reporting

Page 13: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

6.USDOT should

represent the national interest during planning process

Page 14: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

7.USDOT should approve the process

not the targets themselves

Page 15: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

8.The current pipelines of projects

must be allowed to fit

Page 16: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

9. Recognize that it could takea few authorization cycles

before we get where we want to be

Page 17: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

A last word:Collaboration

Page 18: A State Perspective on Performance Management and Planning

A State Perspectiveon Performance Management and Planning

by Deb Miller, Kansas DOT Secretary

National Forum on Performance Based PlanningDallas - September 2010