a rchitectural review board r ~ agenda

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD

REGULAR MEETING

~ Agenda ~

Emily Lockhart, Town Planner 15000 Washington Street, Suite 100 http://www.townofhaymarket.org/ Haymarket, VA 20169

Wednesday, March 17, 2021 7:00 PM Council Chambers

Architectural Review Board Printed 3/16/2021

I. Call To Order

II. Pledge of Allegiance

III. Minute Approval 1. Architectural Review Board - Regular Meeting - Jan 20, 2021 7:00 PM

IV. Agenda Items 1. ZP #2021-002 6852 Jockey Club Lane 2. ZP 2021-003 - Fence 6610 Jefferson Street 3. ZP 2021-004- McDonald's Sign Plan; Leaberry Way

V. Old Business

VI. New Business 1. Sidewalk DIscussion

VII. Planning Commission Update

VIII. Town Council Update

IX. Adjournment

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD

REGULAR MEETING

~ Minutes ~

Emily Lockhart, Town Planner 15000 Washington Street, Suite 100 http://www.townofhaymarket.org/ Haymarket, VA 20169

Wednesday, January 20, 2021 7:00 PM Council Chambers

Architectural Review Board Page 1 Printed 2/10/2021

A Regular Meeting of the Architectural Review Board of the Town of Haymarket, VA, was held this evening in the Council Chambers, commencing at 7:00 PM. Vice Chairwoman Suzanne Luersen called the meeting to order.

I. Call To Order Due to the COV-ID 19 pandemic and Governor Northam's executive order on social distancing, Commissioner Aayush Kharel and Chairwoman Sheridan King attended this evening's meeting via Zoom from their respective homes. Councilman Marchant Schneider: Present, Commissioner Aayush Kharel: Remote, Chairwoman Sheridan King: Remote, Vice Chairwoman Suzanne Luersen: Present, Board Member Rochele Utz: Present.

II. Pledge of Allegiance Vice Chairwoman Suzanne Luersen invited everyone to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.

III. Citizen's Time There were no citizens present wishing to address the Architectural Review Board at this evening's meeting.

IV. Minute Approval 1. Architectural Review Board - Regular Meeting - Nov 18, 2020 7:00 PM Board Member Utz moved to approve the minutes from the November 18, 2020 Architectural Review Board meeting. Councilman Schneider seconded the motion. The motion carried.

RESULT: ACCEPTED [UNANIMOUS]

MOVER: Rochele Utz, Board Member

SECONDER: Marchant Schneider, Councilman

AYES: Schneider, Kharel, King, Luersen, Utz

V. Agenda Items 1. ZP #2021-001 - Zandra's Patio Enclosure 14600 Washington St. Suite 146

Town Planner Emily Lockhart gave a brief update on this application. Ms. Lockhart explained that at the November meeting, the Architectural Review Board gave preliminary approval for this applicant so that they could meet a COV-ID grant funding deadline. She stated the applicant would like to enclose the patio during the colder months to provide additional seating. Ms. Lockhart gave the dimensions, color and general design of the enclosure before handing it over to the applicant who was present via Zoom. At this time, the owner of Zandra's gave a more detailed description of the enclosure. The Board Members asked additional questions regarding the design. The applicant stated that the enclosure would be up from October - March every year but asked for the Board to extend the March time frame until May this year due to the COV-ID restrictions. A short discussion followed on the request to extend the time line until May for this year only. Councilman Schneider moved that the Haymarket Architectural Review Board approve ZP #2021-001 for the patio enclosure at 14600 Washington Street with the following conditions: 1. - that for the first year the enclosure may only be up or be in place from the last week in October through the first week in May 2021 and any subsequent years the enclosure may only be in place from the last week of October until the first week of April and 2. - the structure be maintained in good condition with any repairs be reasonably

3.1

Packet Pg. 2

Min

ute

s A

ccep

tan

ce:

Min

ute

s o

f Ja

n 2

0, 2

021

7:00

PM

(M

inu

te A

pp

rova

l)

Regular Meeting Minutes January 20, 2021


tended to through the duration of the use. Vice Chairman Luersen seconded the motion. The motion carried by a roll call vote.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]

MOVER: Marchant Schneider, Councilman

SECONDER: Suzanne Luersen, Vice Chairwoman


2. Aldi Sign and Facade Architectural Package Town Planner Emily Lockhart introduced the representative from Aldi and invited him to the podium to give the design changes that were suggested from the last Architectural Review Board meeting. Ms. Lockhart shared that her concern with the sign is that it does not meet the height within the zoning ordinance. She stated that the ARB can discuss the design of the sign but the height will have to go through a zoning matter. The representative shared the changes to the building that was suggested at the last meeting. The Board Members discussed the design changes. There was a consensus that all the changes that were made since the last meeting were great with the exception to the sign. They felt the sign under the current ordinance would fit between the second and third floor windows. Councilman Schneider stated that the Planning Commission is currently going through a zoning text amendment and suggested that the representative petition the Commission asking for a larger sign higher up on the building. Mr. Schneider stated that his concern was if the ARB approve the facade on the building and the sign doesn't get approved, then there is no use for the facade. The applicant asked for approval of the changes with the sign as presented in the drawings and if the size of the sign does not get approved then they would lower the size of the sign and place it lower on the building. Town Planner Lockhart stated that it could be at least 6-8 months before the Planning Commission gets to the allowable sign size in the zoning ordinance. A discussion continued on the sign. After the discussion, Councilman Schneider moved to approve ZP#2020-016 for 15201 Washington Street with the following conditions: 1). Window replacement and soldier course approved as presented; 2). A single decorative accent or column be placed on the facade instead of the two as presented; 3). The Aldi sign as presented but within the ordinance standard and lowered between the first and second floor of the building and bordered by the soldier course and centered between the columns. Board Member Utz seconded the motion. The motion carried by a roll call vote.



SECONDER: Rochele Utz, Board Member


3. Robinson Village Architectural Master Plan (Van Metre) 14850/14860 Washington St Because of the difficulties in the presented in the zoom meeting, Chairman King and Commissioner Kharel joined the audio meeting through a conference call instead of via Zoom. Also, at this time Councilman Schneider made a statement recusing himself from this agenda item because of his relationship with the applicant through his job. Mr. Schneider left the building at this time. Town Planner Emily Lockhart gave an update of the requests from the previous meeting. Ms. Lockhart stated that the applicant addressed those requests by showing the updates on the plans and drawings. Ms. Lockhart stated that she is in full support of the materials, color, architectural design and layout and would recommend approval of the Master Plan. Board Member Utz moved that the Architectural Review Board approve the Robinson Village Townhouse Architectural Master Plan as presented at the January 20, 2021 Architectural Review Board Meeting. The approval includes the following: Color Scheme approval for the Townhouses, General Design Layout of the Townhouses, Elevations, Fence Style and Design, Light Style and Design, Playground, Entry Sign and Feature, Deck Materials and Driveway and Lead Walk Materials. Chairwoman King seconded the motion. The motion carried by a roll call vote.

3.1

Packet Pg. 3

Min

ute

s A

ccep

tan

ce:

Min

ute

s o

f Ja

n 2

0, 2

021

7:00

PM

(M

inu

te A

pp

rova

l)



RESULT: ADOPTED [4 TO 0]


SECONDER: Sheridan King, Chairwoman

AYES: Aayush Kharel, Sheridan King, Suzanne Luersen, Rochele Utz

RECUSED: Marchant Schneider

4. Robinson Village Sales Trailer Town Planner Emily Lockhart shared that the Sales Trailer would be located at the front of the property on a commercial site that has not yet been developed. She stated that the trailer would serve as the sales trailer for not only the Robinson Village development but for the development just outside the Town limits. The representative from Van Metre stated that the trailer would remain on the site until a model is built at approximately the end of the year. At this time because of the difficulty in the Zoom streaming, Town Planner asked for a brief recess in order to get all participants off Zoom audio and into a conference call. After the recess, there was a more detailed explanation from the developer in regards to the time frame that the sales trailer would remain on site. There was also discussion about the sales trailer itself and the landscaping on the site. Board Member Utz moved that the Architectural Review Board approved the Architectural design of the sales trailer for the Van Metre project at Robinson Village as well as the landscaping plan as presented at this evening's meeting, January 20, 2021, with the understanding that the applicant will need to meet all zoning requirements prior to the installation of the sales trailer. Vice Chairman Luersen seconded the motion. The motion carried by a roll call vote.

RESULT: ADOPTED [4 TO 0]


SECONDER: Suzanne Luersen, Vice Chairwoman

AYES: Aayush Kharel, Sheridan King, Suzanne Luersen, Rochele Utz

RECUSED: Marchant Schneider

5. Transform Power Yoga Architectrual Master Plan At this time, Councilman Schneider rejoined the meeting. Town Planner Emily Lockhart shared that the materials samples were available at the table. She stated that she would pass them around the dais or they could go to the table to view them as well. Ms. Lockhart introduced the applicant and explained that even though the video of the zoom meeting is running, the audio is through a conference call. She invited the applicant to speak on the design of the building. The applicant stated that the design of the yoga studio is a proposed 2 phased project. Phase one would be 2 yoga studios, some admin offices and a juice bar. Phase Two will be a second story addition with additional class rooms and administrative areas. The applicant stated that the design influence and character is one of tranquility in nature so the building is curved walls and a lot of glass for natural lighting. The materials used will be steel, concrete and wood finished that will be warm yet higher tech finishes. At this time, Ms Lockhart passed around the wood samples that was referenced. The ARB discussed the design of the building. Chairman King stated that even though the design is a bit more modern than what is typical in the Town and after looking at all the notes provided, the design is permitted. She also said that since the building sets off Washington Street and is not primarily visible, the design adds a unique character to the Town itself. Commissioner Kharel agreed with Ms. King's opinion of the design. Councilman Schneider stated that, although he agrees with the overall statements already said, with the building being off the main path through Town it could push the envelope a little with something a little more contemporary and unique. He stated that he looked up the Community Design Standards in the Comprehensive Plan where it states that the ARB will encourage developers to move away from cookie cutter designs and more styles that reflect the post Civil War era. He continued to state that modern or industrial designs are not consistent with the historic district that are not appropriate. He also said after looking that the Town's zoning ordinance requirements, it reflects that a building or structure that will promote the general welfare by generating business,

3.1

Packet Pg. 4

Min

ute

s A

ccep

tan

ce:

Min

ute

s o

f Ja

n 2

0, 2

021

7:00

PM

(M

inu

te A

pp

rova

l)



attracting tourist, students, new residents, stimulating interest in the study or architecture and design. He stated that with that said, he feels that the Architectural Review Board has the policy support to consider this design. Vice Chairwoman Luersen agreed with all the comments made. Board Member Utz did not have any comments on the design. A discussion continued with the representatives regarding their design. There was a discussion on the landscaping and having a soft approach to the building and the materials that will be used on the outside of the building. There was also a discussion on the lighting, signage, the dumpster pad site and more landscaping details that would come to the Architectural Review Board at a later time. With no further discussion, Councilman Schneider stated that he could draft a motion. Councilman Schneider moved that the ARB approve ZP#2021-002 for 6700 Hunting Path Road subject to the architectural drawings submitted with the application and contingent upon future applications that will address the landscaping, the building and parking lot lighting, signage and the materials and location of the dumpster pad. Chairman King seconded the motion. Councilman Schneider re-iterated the reasons for support on this design for the building. With no further comments, the motion carried by a roll call vote.





6. 2021 Meeting Schedule Town Planner Emily Lockhart gave the ARB the 2021 meeting schedule. She stated that there are no conflicts of meetings dates with federal or stated observed holidays.

7. Motion to approve the meeting schedule Board Member Utz moved to the 2021 Meeting Schedule as presented. Chairman King seconded the motion. The motion carried.





VI. Old Business Town Planner Emily Lockhart gave updates on the McDonald's site plan for a second drive thru. She also gave some updates on gateway signs for the Town that may come up at a future meeting.

VII. New Business Town Planner Emily Lockhart shared that there are potential new businesses that would take over some empty spaces within the Town and that those businesses may come in for sign applications.

VIII. Planning Commission Updates Town Planner Emily Lockhart gave the Planning Commission updates from their previous meeting. Ms. Lockhart shared that the Planning Commission denied the SUP for 30 condominiums and that it will be on the Town Council agenda to their next meeting. She also stated that Crossroads Village has applied for 2 SUP's which will be before them at a public hearing at their next meeting. Lastly, Ms. Lockhart shared that the Planning Commission has been working on the Zoning Text Amendment and that they may be bring some items to the ARB for review as it applies to the Zoning Ordinance.

IX. Town Council Updates Councilman Schneider gave the Town Council updates. He stated that the voucher program was well received and was a success along with the video that was put out featuring some of the businesses in the Town. He stated that the Town Council is also looking at a possibility of putting a DMV Select office in the Town building. Mr. Schneider also gave the hotel updates and that the developer will be walking the site with some of the Council.

3.1

Packet Pg. 5

Min

ute

s A

ccep

tan

ce:

Min

ute

s o

f Ja

n 2

0, 2

021

7:00

PM

(M

inu

te A

pp

rova

l)



X. Adjournment With no further business before the Architectural Review Board, Board Member Utz motioned to adjourn with a second by Councilman Schneider. The motion carried.

1. Motion to Adjourn



SECONDER: Marchant Schneider, Councilman


.

Submitted: Approved:

__________________________________ ________________________________ Kim Henry, Clerk of the Council Sheridan King, Chairwoman

3.1

Packet Pg. 6

Min

ute

s A

ccep

tan

ce:

Min

ute

s o

f Ja

n 2

0, 2

021

7:00

PM

(M

inu

te A

pp

rova

l)

1 | P a g e

Emily K. Lockhart

TOWN PLANNER

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

MEMORANDUM

TO: Architectural Review Board

FROM: Emily K. Lockhart, Town Planner

DATE: March 11, 2021

SUBJECT: 6852 Jockey Club Lane – Front Porch Portico Addition

APPLICATION SUMMARY:

Business/Applicant: Prince William Home Improvement

Street Address: 6852 Jockey Club Lane

Proposed Use: Portico over front steps and front door

Applicant’s Brief Description of the Activity: Front porch expansion

Town Planner Assessment Zoning Ordinance Application Details Staff Response

Sec. 58-14.9 Matters to be considered by board in acting on appropriateness of erection, reconstruction, alteration, restoration or demolition of building or structure.

Portico on front porch The proposed alteration is visible from the public right of way

Sec. 58-14.9 (1) Exterior architectural features, including all signs, which are subject to public view from a public street, way or place.

Portico on front porch The proposed alteration is visible from the public right of way

Sec. 58-14.9 (2) General Design Arrangement

Portico on front porch The Zoning Ordinance does not provide a definition for the general design arrangement; thus, this matter is at the discretion of the ARB.

Sec. 58-14.9 (3) Texture, material and color

Portico on front porch The applicant is proposing a portico over the front door. The roofing material will match the existing roof and the pillars will match the existing white trim.

4.1.a

Packet Pg. 7

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

-- P

ort

ico

(1)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

2 | P a g e

Sec. 58-14.9 (4) The relation of the factors, subsections (1), (2), and (3) of this section, to similar features of the buildings and structures in the immediate surroundings

Portico on front porch The front porch will blend with the homes in the neighborhood and share similar characteristics

Sec. 58-14.9 (5) The extent to which the building or structure would be harmonious with or obviously incongruous with the old and historic aspect of the surroundings

Portico on front porch The style of the front porch is harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood

Sec. 58-14.9 (6) In the case of a building to be razed, a primary consideration will be the extent to which its continued existence would tend to protect irreplaceable historic places and preserve the general historic atmosphere of the Town

Not applicable Not applicable

Sec. 58-14.9 (7) The extent to which the building or structure will promote the general welfare of the Town, and all citizens, by the preservation and protection of historic places and areas

Portico on front porch This matter is at the discretion of the ARB

Sec. 58-14.9 (8) The extent to which the building or structure will promote the general welfare by:

(a) Maintaining and increasing real estate values

(b) Generating business (c) Creating new positions (d) Attracting tourists,

students, writers, historians, artists and artisans, and new residents

(e) Encouraging study of and interest in American history

Portico on front porch These matters are at the discretion of the ARB

4.1.a

Packet Pg. 8

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

-- P

ort

ico

(1)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

3 | P a g e

(f) Stimulating interest in and study of architecture and design

(g) Educating citizens in American culture and heritage

(h) Making the Town a more attractive and desirable place in which to live

Comprehensive Plan

Comp Plan 1.5.3 Historic Resource Inventory List

Site – 6852 Jockey Club Lane The main structure/site IS NOT listed on the Historic Resource List

Comp Plan 1.5.4 Potential Archaeological Site

Site – 6852 Jockey Club Lane The site is not one of those listed as a potential archaeological site in the Comprehensive Plan

Architectural Review Board Historic Guidelines

I. Introduction (E) Community Design and the Comprehensive Plan

Site – 6852 Jockey Club Lane Residential Portion of Town

II. Streetscape and Site Design II. (a) Washington Street Enhancement Project


II. (b) Streetscapes Other Than Washington Street


II. (c) Fences and Walls Not Applicable Not Applicable

II. (d) Lighting (Free Standing/Posts)

Not Applicable Not Applicable

II. (e) Telecommunication Dishes, Drums and Towers


II. (f) Screening Not Applicable Not Applicable III. New Construction and Additions to Existing Non-Historic and Non-Contributing Structures III. (a) General Guidelines “to create a more pleasing blend of

historic and new elements in the Town, new structures shall be compatible with the prevailing and recognized historic architectural character of the existing adjacent structures”

These matters are at the discretion of the ARB

III. (b) Colors The colors proposed are within the Historic Guidelines permittable colors.

III. (c) Exterior Elements Exterior elements are consistent with the approved materials

III. (d) Chimneys Not Applicable Not Applicable

III. (e) Roofing Not Applicable Not Applicable

4.1.a

Packet Pg. 9

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

-- P

ort

ico

(1)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

4 | P a g e

III. (f) Lighting, (attached to structure)


III. (g) Windows and Doors Not Applicable Not Applicable

III. (h) Decks Not Applicable Not Applicable

III. (i) Handicapped Ramps Not Applicable Not Applicable

III. (j) Awnings Not Applicable Not Applicable IV. Guidelines for Alterations or Additions to Historic Structures or Contributing Structures IV. (a) General Guidelines Not Applicable

Not Applicable

V. Signage Not Applicable Not Applicable, not historic or contributing

VI. Demolition Guidelines Not Applicable Not Applicable

VII. Situations Not Covered, Additional Requirements


STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Based on the above assessment the Town Planner recommends the Board approve the application as

submitted, the Greenhill Crossing HOA has provided an HOA approval letter for the work being completed.

Draft Motion: “I move the Board approve the COA ZP#2021-002 for the portico on the front porch of 6852

Jockey Club Lane.”

Or an alternate motion.

4.1.a

Packet Pg. 10

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

-- P

ort

ico

(1)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

4.1.b

Packet Pg. 11

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

Ap

plic

atio

n (

2) (

4939

: Z

P #

2021

-002

685

2 Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane)

4.1.b

Packet Pg. 12

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

Ap

plic

atio

n (

2) (

4939

: Z

P #

2021

-002

685

2 Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane)

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 13

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

Ap

plic

atio

n M

ater

ials

(3)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 14

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

Ap

plic

atio

n M

ater

ials

(3)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 15

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

Ap

plic

atio

n M

ater

ials

(3)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 16

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

Ap

plic

atio

n M

ater

ials

(3)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 17

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

Ap

plic

atio

n M

ater

ials

(3)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

4.1.c

Packet Pg. 18

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

002

6852

Jo

ckey

Clu

b L

ane

Ap

plic

atio

n M

ater

ials

(3)

(49

39 :

ZP

#20

21-0

02 6

852

Jock

ey C

lub

Lan

e)

1 | P a g e

Emily K. Lockhart

TOWN PLANNER


MEMORANDUM




SUBJECT: 6610 Jefferson Street, Fence Application


Business/Applicant: Suzie Bailey

Street Address: 6610 Jefferson Street

Proposed Use: Fence Application

Applicant’s Brief Description of the Activity: Fence along front of property and north property line



Fence, black wrought iron style (material will be vinyl, but look like wrought iron)

The proposed alteration is visible from the public right of way



The proposed alteration is visible from the public right of way



The Guidelines and Zoning Ordinance address fences – the proposed fence is in keeping with the standards in the ordinance and guidelines. The fence will be four foot along the front and the north side of the property.



The fence will be four foot high along the front of the property and the north side of the property. The materials and colors are within the set standards of the ARB Guidelines.

4.2.a

Packet Pg. 19

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

003,

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet

-- F

ence

(4

943

: Z

P 2

021-

003

- F

ence

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet)

2 | P a g e

The color of the fence is black, material is vinyl and it will be wrought iron style.



The proposed fence style will look appropriate for this property and in keeping with the character of the surrounding properties.



The proposed fence style will look appropriate for this property and in keeping with the character of the surrounding properties.





This matter is at the discretion of the ARB







4.2.a

Packet Pg. 20

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

003,

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet

-- F

ence

(4

943

: Z

P 2

021-

003

- F

ence

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet)

3 | P a g e





Comprehensive Plan


Site – 6610 Jefferson Street The main structure/site IS NOT listed on the Historic Resource List


Site – 6610 Jefferson Street The site is not one of those listed as a potential archaeological site in the Comprehensive Plan



Site – 6610 Jefferson Street Residential 1 Portion of Town





II. (c) Fences and Walls 6610 Jefferson Street Proposed fence meets the requirements as presented in the guidelines





II. (f) Screening Not Applicable Not Applicable

III. New Construction and Additions to Existing Non-Historic and Non-Contributing Structures III. (a) General Guidelines “to create a more pleasing blend of




4.2.a

Packet Pg. 21

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

003,

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet

-- F

ence

(4

943

: Z

P 2

021-

003

- F

ence

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet)

4 | P a g e







III. (h) Decks Not Applicable Not Applicable

III. (i) Handicapped Ramps Not Applicable Not Applicable III. (j) Awnings Not Applicable Not Applicable IV. Guidelines for Alterations or Additions to Historic Structures or Contributing Structures IV. (a) General Guidelines Not Applicable

Not Applicable

V. Signage Not Applicable Not Applicable, not historic or contributing





Based on the above assessment of the proposed fence application, the Town Planner recommends approval.

The fence meets the guideline requirements and the zoning ordinance requirements.

Draft Motion: “I move the Board approve the COA ZP#2021-003, for the fence addition at 6610 Jefferson

Street.”


4.2.a

Packet Pg. 22

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

003,

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet

-- F

ence

(4

943

: Z

P 2

021-

003

- F

ence

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet)

4.2.b

Packet Pg. 23

Att

ach

men

t: 6

610

Jeff

erso

n S

t (2

) (

4943

: Z

P 2

021-

003

- F

ence

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet)

4.2.b

Packet Pg. 24

Att

ach

men

t: 6

610

Jeff

erso

n S

t (2

) (

4943

: Z

P 2

021-

003

- F

ence

661

0 Je

ffer

son

Str

eet)

1 | P a g e

Emily K. Lockhart

TOWN PLANNER


MEMORANDUM




SUBJECT: 6740 Lea Berry Way, Master Sign Plan for McDonald’s


Business/Applicant: McDonald’s/ Mid-Atlantic Permitting Services

Street Address: 6740 Lea Berry Way

Proposed Use: Master Sign Plan Application

Applicant’s Brief Description of the Activity: Sign Plan



Master Sign Plan The proposed alterations are visible from the public right of way


Master Sign Plan The proposed alteration is visible from the public right of way


Master Sign Plan The Zoning Ordinance does not provide a definition for the general design arrangement; thus, this matter is at the discretion of the ARB.


Master Sign Plan The applicant is proposing a Master Sign Plan for the renovations at the McDonald’s on Lea Berry Way. The applicant has received approval for a second drive thru lane and thus the signs within the site required modifications.

4.3.a

Packet Pg. 25

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

004

-- M

cDo

nal

d's

Mas

ter

Sig

n P

lan

(4

944

: Z

P 2

021-

004-

McD

on

ald

's S

ign

Pla

n;

Lea

ber

ry W

ay)

2 | P a g e

The materials and colors are within the set standards of the ARB Guidelines. The colors of the sign are white, black, red and yellow. The signs utilize the franchise colors.


Master Sign Plan The Master Sign Plan will provide signage to best utilize the drive thru lanes. The signage is in keeping with typical drive-thru signs and will be harmonious with the surrounding uses and appropriate signs.


Master Sign Plan The signage plan is a necessary aspect of business for the drive-thru use. The building signage will be harmonious with the surrounding areas




Master Sign Plan This matter is at the discretion of the ARB





Master Sign Plan These matters are at the discretion of the ARB

4.3.a

Packet Pg. 26

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

004

-- M

cDo

nal

d's

Mas

ter

Sig

n P

lan

(4

944

: Z

P 2

021-

004-

McD

on

ald

's S

ign

Pla

n;

Lea

ber

ry W

ay)

3 | P a g e





Comprehensive Plan


Site – 6740 Lea Berry Way The main structure/site IS NOT listed on the Historic Resource List


Site – 6740 Lea Berry Way The site is not one of those listed as a potential archaeological site in the Comprehensive Plan



Site – 6740 Lea Berry Way Industrial Portion of Town





II. (c) Fences and Walls Not Applicable Not Applicable





II. (f) Screening Not Applicable Not Applicable III. New Construction and Additions to Existing Non-Historic and Non-Contributing Structures III. (a) General Guidelines “to create a more pleasing blend of





4.3.a

Packet Pg. 27

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

004

-- M

cDo

nal

d's

Mas

ter

Sig

n P

lan

(4

944

: Z

P 2

021-

004-

McD

on

ald

's S

ign

Pla

n;

Lea

ber

ry W

ay)

4 | P a g e






III. (h) Decks Not Applicable Not Applicable III. (i) Handicapped Ramps Not Applicable Not Applicable III. (j) Awnings Not Applicable Not Applicable IV. Guidelines for Alterations or Additions to Historic Structures or Contributing Structures IV. (a) General Guidelines Not Applicable

Not Applicable

V. Signage 6740 Lea Berry Way Not Applicable, not historic or contributing





Based on the above assessment of the Master Sign Plan, the Town Planner recommends approval as presented.

The signs meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.

Draft Motion: “I move the Board approve the COA ZP#2021-004 for the Master Sign Plan for McDonald’s at

6740 Lea Berry Way”


4.3.a

Packet Pg. 28

Att

ach

men

t: Z

P#2

021-

004

-- M

cDo

nal

d's

Mas

ter

Sig

n P

lan

(4

944

: Z

P 2

021-

004-

McD

on

ald

's S

ign

Pla

n;

Lea

ber

ry W

ay)

P.O. Box 1230 * Haymarket, Virginia 20168 * 703-753-2600 * FAX: 703-753-2800Zoning Permit Application Page 1of 2 – Revised 12-19-11

ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION

ZONING PERMIT #: _________________

NOTE: This application must be filled out completely and all components of submission requirements must be met before the application can be accepted and scheduled for review/hearing.

ZONING ACTIVITY: New Construction Alteration/Repair Addition Sign (See Spec sheet) (Check all that apply) New Tenant/Use Change of Use Relocation

NAME OF BUSINESS/APPLICANT:________________________________________________ PROPOSED USE: ________________________ Size (Sq. Ft./Length) of Construction: _

SITE ADDRESS: ________________________________ Parcel ID #:

Subdivision Name: ________________________________ Lot Size: _____________________

ZONING DISTRICT: R-1 R-2 B-1 B-2 I-1 C-1

Special Use Permit Required: Yes No Site Plan Required: Yes No

Off-street Parking: Spaces Required: Spaces Provided: _____________________

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: (i.e. previous use, height/length of fencing,deck specs, etc.) ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Supporting Documentation (attached): Narrative Plan/Plat Specification Sheet

FEE: $25.00 Residential $50.00 Commercial __________________________________________________________________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION: (i.e. color, type of material, font style, etc. See Sign Spec Sheet for Signage detail) ___________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________ Supporting Documentation (attached): Specification Sheet Photograph(s)

PERMIT HOLDER INFORMATION PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION _________________________________ _________________________________ Name Name _________________________________ ____________________________________ Address Address _________________________________ ____________________________________ City State Zip City State Zip ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Phone# Email Phone# Email

MCDONALD'S

RESTAURANT

6740 LEA BERRY WAY 7298-70-4485

0.98 ACRES

ARCHLAND PROPERTY 1 LLC

PO BOX 182571

COLUMBUS OH 43218

301-876-4987

KEN PADGETT - MID-ATLANTIC PERMITTING SERVICES

6 BAFFIN BAY CT

ROCKVILLE MD 20853

301-370-2126 [email protected]

INSTALL WALL SIGNS, DRIVE THRU EQUIPMENT (ORDER CANOPY, PRE-BROWSE MENU BOARD, MEN BOARD,AND CLEARANCE BAR), MONUMENT SIGN AND DIRECTIONAL SIGN.

SEE SIGN DETAIL SHEETS

4.3.b

Packet Pg. 29

Att

ach

men

t: z

on

ing

_per

mit

_fo

rm-c

oa_

McD

on

ald

s 67

40 L

ea B

erry

Way

(2)

(49

44 :

ZP

202

1-00

4- M

cDo

nal

d's

Sig

n P

lan

; L

eab

erry

Way

)

4.3.b

Packet Pg. 30

Att

ach

men

t: z

on

ing

_per

mit

_fo

rm-c

oa_

McD

on

ald

s 67

40 L

ea B

erry

Way

(2)

(49

44 :

ZP

202

1-00

4- M

cDo

nal

d's

Sig

n P

lan

; L

eab

erry

Way

)

15000 Washington Street* Suite 100 * Haymarket, Virginia 20169 * 703-753-2600 * FAX: 703-753-2800Zoning Permit Application Page 2 of 2 – Revised 10-29-14

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING APPLICATION

In addition to applying for a Certificate of Appropriateness, the applicant is responsible for obtaining any other required permits and approvals applicable to the project.

1. Provide name, phone number, and email address of business or individual requesting approval for proposed work. If different from property owner, please provide contact information for property owner as well.

2. Indicate site address3. Indicate mailing address of applicant and owner (if different).4. Describe in detail work proposed and then attach all required and any additional documentation or material that will

describe the project in detail to the reviewing authority. Adequate documentation must be provided. Applicant should provide any necessary item(s), in addition to the items listed on the checklist below.

Check ListSigns/Fences/New Building/Additions/Remodel

The Completed application must be submitted to the Town Clerk’s office no later than 4:30pm one week prior to the meeting date.

1) One copy of the Plat-showing location of sign/fence/addition on the façade or grounds2) Photograph of the existing structure and closest neighboring structures3) Photograph/drawings, including measurements, of the proposed change4) Material specifications 5) Color/material samples6) Description of method of mounting and description of hardware to be used7) Landlord/HOA approval letter where indicated8) Copy of business or occupational license if contractor has designed or will install9) Narrative, if special requests or exceptions to the ARB Guidelines are being requested.10) Applicant or a representative must be present at the ARB meeting, on the scheduled Wednesday of every month at 7:00pm. If a representative is not present at the meeting to answer any questions that may arise, your application may be deferred or denied until the next regularly scheduled meeting. Please check the Town’s website for a list of the Town’s scheduled meetings. It is the applicant’s responsibility to keep apprised of the Town’s meeting schedule.11) If an interpreter is required, the applicant needs to bring one with them.

Please mail application and all applicable information and materials to:Town of Haymarket

15000 Washington Street, Suite 100Haymarket, VA 20169

4.3.b

Packet Pg. 31

Att

ach

men

t: z

on

ing

_per

mit

_fo

rm-c

oa_

McD

on

ald

s 67

40 L

ea B

erry

Way

(2)

(49

44 :

ZP

202

1-00

4- M

cDo

nal

d's

Sig

n P

lan

; L

eab

erry

Way

)


SIGN SPECIFICATION SHEET

SIGN 1: Type of Sign: Wall Hanging Freestanding Menu Individual Letter Window

Other ___________________________________________________________________________Height above Ground at Signs: Lower Edge: ________ Upper Edge: _________Height of Sign Structure:_______ Sign Width:_______ Length:______ Area in Sq Ft:_______Number of Faces: _______ Sign Material/Color/Font:_______________________________________Location of Sign (Include photo): ________________________________________________________Lighting Type/Fixture (No internal illumation is allowed): ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________







2.00' 2.00' 16.42' 32.841 ALUMINUM & ACRYLIC


LED

LEDFRONT ELEVATION

REAR ELEVATION

"MCDONALD'S"

"MCDONALD'S"

1.00' 0.83' 3.00' 2.491

DRIVE THRU ELEVATION

WINDOW POSITION SIGN "PAY HERE"

1.00' 0.83' 3.00' 2.491

DRIVE THRU ELEVATION

WINDOW POSITION SIGN "PICK UP HERE"NA

NA

13.50' 15.50'

13.50' 15.50'

8.75' 9.75'

ALUMINUM & ACRYLIC

ALUMINUM & ACRYLIC

8.75' 9.75'

4.3.b

Packet Pg. 32

Att

ach

men

t: z

on

ing

_per

mit

_fo

rm-c

oa_

McD

on

ald

s 67

40 L

ea B

erry

Way

(2)

(49

44 :

ZP

202

1-00

4- M

cDo

nal

d's

Sig

n P

lan

; L

eab

erry

Way

)



SIGN : Type of Sign: Wall Hanging Freestanding Menu Individual Letter Window








11' 1.50' 1.50' 8.951

DRIVE THRU LANENA

DOUBLE GATEWAY CLEARANCE BAR "DRIVE THRU CLEARACE 9 FEET ANY LANE ANY TIME"

7.00' 8.5'

11.00' 0.67' 5.00' 3.35

ORDER CANOPY DRIVE THRU LANE

DRIVE THRU LANE

11.00' 0.67' 5.00' 3.35

1

1 VINYL WHITE

ORDER CANOPY DRIVE THRU LANE


DRIVE THRU LANE

1.81' 5.96'

PRE-BROWSE MENU BOARD

VINYL WHITE

"ORDER HERE"

"ORDER HERE"

LED

CLEARANCE BAR

ORDER CANOPY

DRIVE THRU LANE

LED

LED

ORDER CANOPY

4.3.b

Packet Pg. 33

Att

ach

men

t: z

on

ing

_per

mit

_fo

rm-c

oa_

McD

on

ald

s 67

40 L

ea B

erry

Way

(2)

(49

44 :

ZP

202

1-00

4- M

cDo

nal

d's

Sig

n P

lan

; L

eab

erry

Way

)











1.81' 5.96'5.96' 2.42' 4.15' 10.04

1 ALUMINUM & ACRYLIC

PRE-BROWSE MENU BOARD


1.82' 5.96'

DRIVE THRU LANE

MENU BOARD

1.82' 5.96'5.96' 4.83' 4.14' 19.99

DRIVE THRU LANE1 ALUMINUM & ACRYLIC

MENU BOARD

LED

LED

LED

DRIVE THRU LANE

8.00' 13.00'13.00' 5.00' 5.00' 25

2

MONUMENT SIGN W/ ARCH LOGO

LOT CORNER OF LEA BERRY WAY & WASHINGTON STALUMINUM & ACRYLIC

LED

4.3.b

Packet Pg. 34

Att

ach

men

t: z

on

ing

_per

mit

_fo

rm-c

oa_

McD

on

ald

s 67

40 L

ea B

erry

Way

(2)

(49

44 :

ZP

202

1-00

4- M

cDo

nal

d's

Sig

n P

lan

; L

eab

erry

Way

)





3.00' 7.00'7.00' 1.17' 3.92' 4.59

ALUMINUM

"RESERVED DRIVE THRU"NA

DRIVE THRU LANE EXIT

4.3.b

Packet Pg. 35

Att

ach

men

t: z

on

ing

_per

mit

_fo

rm-c

oa_

McD

on

ald

s 67

40 L

ea B

erry

Way

(2)

(49

44 :

ZP

202

1-00

4- M

cDo

nal

d's

Sig

n P

lan

; L

eab

erry

Way

)

3' x 0.83 = 2.25 SF

2.0' X16.42' = 32.84 SF

A

B

A

B

4.3.c

Packet Pg. 36

Att

ach

men

t: P

lan

s 11

x17

McD

on

ald

s L

ea B

erry

Way

(3)

(49

44 :

ZP

202

1-00

4- M

cDo

nal

d's

Sig

n P

lan

; L

eab

erry

Way

)

permi

Typewritten Text

BUILDING MOUNTED SIGNS

15

1 3

24

2

4

4.3.c

Packet Pg. 37

Att

ach

men

t: P

lan

s 11

x17

McD

on

ald

s L

ea B

erry

Way

(3)

(49

44 :

ZP

202

1-00

4- M

cDo

nal

d's

Sig

n P

lan

; L

eab

erry

Way

)

permi

Typewritten Text

DRIVE THRU & FREESTANDING SIGNS

a rchitectural review board r ~ agenda

Documents