a model of robust positions in social structure matt bothner edward bishop smith harrison c. white...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure
Matt BothnerEdward Bishop Smith
Harrison C. White
University of ChicagoColumbia University
![Page 2: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Nortons: Spring & Summer 1937
![Page 3: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Nortons: Spring & Summer 1937
![Page 4: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Bowling Finishing Rank
Sta
tus
in N
ort
on
s S
tre
et
Ga
ng
2 4 6 8 10
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Danny
Doc
Long John
Mike
Joe Carl
Frank
Alec
![Page 5: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Bowling Finishing Rank
Sta
tus
in N
ort
on
s S
tre
et
Ga
ng
2 4 6 8 10
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Danny
Doc
Long John
Mike
Joe Carl
Frank
Alec
![Page 6: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Alec’s Attack on Long John
“He seems to have the Indian sign on me.” -- Long John
“It is significant that, in making his challenge, Alec selectedLong John instead of Doc, Danny, or Mike. It was not that LongJohn's bowling ability was uncertain. His average was about thesame as that of Doc or Danny and better than that of Mike. As amember of the top group but not a leader in his own right, it washis social position that was vulnerable.” – Whyte
![Page 7: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Methodological Contribution: Using Nutsy’s Descent (Early Spring 1937)
![Page 8: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Nortons: Spring & Summer 1937
![Page 9: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Nortons: Early Spring 1937
![Page 10: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[2] Angelo .5 0 .5 .5 .8 .5 .9 .5 .3 .8 .5 .5 .5
[3] Carl .5 .5 0 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .9
[4] Danny .5 .5 .5 0 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 1 .5 .5
[5] Doc 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[6] Frank .8 .5 .5 .3 .5 0 .5 .9 .3 .5 .3 .5 .5
[7] Fred .5 .5 .5 .1 .5 .5 0 .5 .3 .9 .1 .5 .5
[8] Joe .9 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 0 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[9] Long John .3 .3 .3 .9 .9 .3 .3 .3 0 .3 .9 .3 .3
[10] Lou .5 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 0 .1 .5 .5
[11] Mike .5 .5 .5 1 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 0 .5 .5
[12] Nutsy .6 .2 .4 .6 .6 .7 .4 .8 .1 .4 .6 0 .4
[13] Tommy .5 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 0
Methodological Contribution: Using Nutsy’s Descent (Early Spring 1937)
![Page 11: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[2] Angelo .5 0 .5 .5 .8 .5 .9 .5 .3 .8 .5 .5 .5
[3] Carl .5 .5 0 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .9
[4] Danny .5 .5 .5 0 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 1 .5 .5
[5] Doc 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[6] Frank .8 .5 .5 .3 .5 0 .5 .9 .3 .5 .3 .5 .5
[7] Fred .5 .5 .5 .1 .5 .5 0 .5 .3 .9 .1 .5 .5
[8] Joe .9 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 0 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[9] Long John .3 .3 .3 .9 .9 .3 .3 .3 0 .3 .9 .3 .3
[10] Lou .5 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 0 .1 .5 .5
[11] Mike .5 .5 .5 1 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 0 .5 .5
[12] Nutsy .6 .2 .4 .6 .6 .7 .4 .8 .1 .4 .6 0 .4
[13] Tommy .5 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 0
Methodological Contribution: Using Nutsy’s Descent (Early Spring 1937)
![Page 12: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[2] Angelo .5 0 .5 .5 .8 .5 .9 .5 .3 .8 .5 .5 .5
[3] Carl .5 .5 0 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .9
[4] Danny .5 .5 .5 0 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 1 .5 .5
[5] Doc 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[6] Frank .8 .5 .5 .3 .5 0 .5 .9 .3 .5 .3 .5 .5
[7] Fred .5 .5 .5 .1 .5 .5 0 .5 .3 .9 .1 .5 .5
[8] Joe .9 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 0 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[9] Long John .3 .3 .3 .9 .9 .3 .3 .3 0 .3 .9 .3 .3
[10] Lou .5 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 0 .1 .5 .5
[11] Mike .5 .5 .5 1 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 0 .5 .5
[12] Nutsy .6 .2 .4 .6 .6 .7 .4 .8 .1 .4 .6 0 .4
[13] Tommy .5 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 0
Methodological Contribution: Using Nutsy’s Descent (Early Spring 1937)
![Page 13: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
α,β α+βi j ijj
S S X
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[2] Angelo .5 0 .5 .5 .8 .5 .9 .5 .3 .8 .5 .5 .5
[3] Carl .5 .5 0 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .9
[4] Danny .5 .5 .5 0 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 1 .5 .5
[5] Doc 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[6] Frank .8 .5 .5 .3 .5 0 .5 .9 .3 .5 .3 .5 .5
[7] Fred .5 .5 .5 .1 .5 .5 0 .5 .3 .9 .1 .5 .5
[8] Joe .9 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 0 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[9] Long John .3 .3 .3 .9 .9 .3 .3 .3 0 .3 .9 .3 .3
[10] Lou .5 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 0 .1 .5 .5
[11] Mike .5 .5 .5 1 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 0 .5 .5
[12] Nutsy .6 .2 .4 .6 .6 .7 .4 .8 .1 .4 .6 0 .4
[13] Tommy .5 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 0
Methodological Contribution: Using Nutsy’s Descent (Early Spring 1937)
![Page 14: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
α,β α+βi j ijj
S S X k 1
k=0
α,β α β k
S X 1
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[2] Angelo .5 0 .5 .5 .8 .5 .9 .5 .3 .8 .5 .5 .5
[3] Carl .5 .5 0 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .9
[4] Danny .5 .5 .5 0 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 1 .5 .5
[5] Doc 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[6] Frank .8 .5 .5 .3 .5 0 .5 .9 .3 .5 .3 .5 .5
[7] Fred .5 .5 .5 .1 .5 .5 0 .5 .3 .9 .1 .5 .5
[8] Joe .9 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 0 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[9] Long John .3 .3 .3 .9 .9 .3 .3 .3 0 .3 .9 .3 .3
[10] Lou .5 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 0 .1 .5 .5
[11] Mike .5 .5 .5 1 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 0 .5 .5
[12] Nutsy .6 .2 .4 .6 .6 .7 .4 .8 .1 .4 .6 0 .4
[13] Tommy .5 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 0
Methodological Contribution: Using Nutsy’s Descent (Early Spring 1937)
![Page 15: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Nortons’ Status Scores: Early Spring 1937
Alec .67
Angelo 1.06
Carl .75
Danny 1.23
Doc 1.79
Frank .90
Fred .82
Joe .75
Long John .90
Lou .71
Mike 1.23
Nutsy .90
Tommy .67
status
![Page 16: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Nortons: Early Spring 1937
![Page 17: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[2] Angelo .5 0 .5 .5 .8 .5 .9 .5 .3 .8 .5 .5 .5
[3] Carl .5 .5 0 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 .9
[4] Danny .5 .5 .5 0 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 1 .5 .5
[5] Doc 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
[6] Frank .8 .5 .5 .3 .5 0 .5 .9 .3 .5 .3 .5 .5
[7] Fred .5 .5 .5 .1 .5 .5 0 .5 .3 .9 .1 .5 .5
[8] Joe .9 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 0 .3 .5 .1 .5 .5
[9] Long John .3 .3 .3 .9 .9 .3 .3 .3 0 .3 .9 .3 .3
[10] Lou .5 .5 .5 .1 .3 .5 .5 .5 .3 0 .1 .5 .5
[11] Mike .5 .5 .5 1 1 .5 .5 .5 1 .5 0 .5 .5
[12] Nutsy .6 .2 .4 .6 .6 .7 .4 .8 .1 .4 .6 0 .4
[13] Tommy .5 .5 .5 .1 .1 .5 .5 .5 .3 .5 .1 .5 0
Measuring Fragility (and Robustness)
simple two-step transformation: normalize each entry by its row sum andsquare the proportions
![Page 18: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Measuring Fragility (and Robustness)
simple two-step transformation: normalize each entry by its row sum andsquare the proportions
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[2] Angelo 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
[3] Carl 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03
[4] Danny 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00
[5] Doc 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
[6] Frank 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[7] Fred 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01
[8] Joe 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[9] LongJohn 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00
[10] Lou 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
[11] Mike 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
[12] Nutsy 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
[13] Tommy 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00
![Page 19: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
, +i j ijj
F a b a bF Z
Measuring Fragility (and Robustness)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[2] Angelo 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
[3] Carl 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03
[4] Danny 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00
[5] Doc 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
[6] Frank 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[7] Fred 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01
[8] Joe 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[9] LongJohn 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00
[10] Lou 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
[11] Mike 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
[12] Nutsy 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
[13] Tommy 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00
![Page 20: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
, +i j ijj
F a b a bF Z k 1
k=0
, ka b a b
F Z 1
Measuring Fragility (and Robustness)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[2] Angelo 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
[3] Carl 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03
[4] Danny 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00
[5] Doc 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
[6] Frank 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[7] Fred 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01
[8] Joe 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[9] LongJohn 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00
[10] Lou 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
[11] Mike 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
[12] Nutsy 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
[13] Tommy 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00
![Page 21: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
, +i j ijj
F a b a bF Z k 1
k=0
, ka b a b
F Z 1
Measuring Fragility (and Robustness)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
[1] Alec 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[2] Angelo 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
[3] Carl 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03
[4] Danny 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00
[5] Doc 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
[6] Frank 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[7] Fred 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01
[8] Joe 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01
[9] LongJohn 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00
[10] Lou 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01
[11] Mike 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
[12] Nutsy 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00
[13] Tommy 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00
b c c is a parameter capturing thecoupling of nodes in the network
![Page 22: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Nortons’ Fragility Scores: Autumn 1937
Alec .67 1.03
Angelo 1.06 .91
Carl .75 1.06
Danny 1.23 .94
Doc 1.79 .85
Frank .90 .97
Fred .82 1.02
Joe .75 1.06
Long John .90 1.17
Lou .71 .99
Mike 1.23 .94
Nutsy .90 .99
Tommy .67 1.03
status fragility
![Page 23: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The Nortons: Autumn 1937
![Page 24: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Predicting Status Growth in Newcomb’s Fraternity
, 1 1 , 1i t it it i t i tS S F
![Page 25: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Models Predicting Status, t+1 in Newcomb’s Fraternity
1 2 3 4
Status 0.56545 0.53436 0.32897 0.32897
(0.03475)** (0.04444)** (0.08848)** (0.08848)**
Fragility (decoupling assumed; c=0) -0.05100 0.17340
(0.04548) (0.12635)
Fragility (coupling assumed; c=.99) -0.17216 -0.09097
(0.09056)** (0.03283)**
Constraint 5.62474
(1.78250)**
Sychophant -0.00696
(0.00217)**
Constant 0.48865 0.57128 0.44281 -0.58196
(0.04246)** (0.08503)** (0.08576)** (0.43804)
N 238 238 238 238
R2 Within 0.5688 0.5714 0.5788 0.6032
Standard errors in parentheses
* significant at 5%; ** significant at 1% (one tailed)
Fixed effects for individuals and time periods included but not shown
![Page 26: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Models Predicting Status, t+1 in Newcomb’s Fraternity
1 2 3 4
Status 0.56545 0.53436 0.32897 0.32897
(0.03475)** (0.04444)** (0.08848)** (0.08848)**
Fragility (decoupling assumed; c=0) -0.05100 0.17340
(0.04548) (0.12635)
Fragility (coupling assumed; c=.99) -0.17216 -0.09097
(0.09056)** (0.03283)**
Constraint 5.62474
(1.78250)**
Sychophant -0.00696
(0.00217)**
Constant 0.48865 0.57128 0.44281 -0.58196
(0.04246)** (0.08503)** (0.08576)** (0.43804)
N 238 238 238 238
R2 Within 0.5688 0.5714 0.5788 0.6032
Standard errors in parentheses
* significant at 5%; ** significant at 1% (one tailed)
Fixed effects for individuals and time periods included but not shown
![Page 27: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Models Predicting Status, t+1 in Newcomb’s Fraternity
1 2 3 4
Status 0.56545 0.53436 0.32897 0.32897
(0.03475)** (0.04444)** (0.08848)** (0.08848)**
Fragility (decoupling assumed; c=0) -0.05100 0.17340
(0.04548) (0.12635)
Fragility (coupling assumed; c=.99) -0.17216 -0.09097
(0.09056)** (0.03283)**
Constraint 5.62474
(1.78250)**
Sychophant -0.00696
(0.00217)**
Constant 0.48865 0.57128 0.44281 -0.58196
(0.04246)** (0.08503)** (0.08576)** (0.43804)
N 238 238 238 238
R2 Within 0.5688 0.5714 0.5788 0.6032
Standard errors in parentheses
* significant at 5%; ** significant at 1% (one tailed)
Fixed effects for individuals and time periods included but not shown
![Page 28: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Models Predicting Status, t+1 in Newcomb’s Fraternity
1 2 3 4
Status 0.56545 0.53436 0.32897 0.32897
(0.03475)** (0.04444)** (0.08848)** (0.08848)**
Fragility (decoupling assumed; c=0) -0.05100 0.17340
(0.04548) (0.12635)
Fragility (coupling assumed; c=.99) -0.17216 -0.09097
(0.09056)** (0.03283)**
Constraint 5.62474
(1.78250)**
Sychophant -0.00696
(0.00217)**
Constant 0.48865 0.57128 0.44281 -0.58196
(0.04246)** (0.08503)** (0.08576)** (0.43804)
N 238 238 238 238
R2 Within 0.5688 0.5714 0.5788 0.6032
Standard errors in parentheses
* significant at 5%; ** significant at 1% (one tailed)
Fixed effects for individuals and time periods included but not shown
![Page 29: A Model of Robust Positions in Social Structure Matt Bothner Edward Bishop Smith Harrison C. White University of Chicago Columbia University](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070415/5697bf831a28abf838c86344/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Models Predicting Status, t+1 in Newcomb’s Fraternity
1 2 3 4
Status 0.56545 0.53436 0.32897 0.32897
(0.03475)** (0.04444)** (0.08848)** (0.08848)**
Fragility (decoupling assumed; c=0) -0.05100 0.17340
(0.04548) (0.12635)
Fragility (coupling assumed; c=.99) -0.17216 -0.09097
(0.09056)** (0.03283)**
Constraint 5.62474
(1.78250)**
Sychophant -0.00696
(0.00217)**
Constant 0.48865 0.57128 0.44281 -0.58196
(0.04246)** (0.08503)** (0.08576)** (0.43804)
N 238 238 238 238
R2 Within 0.5688 0.5714 0.5788 0.6032
Standard errors in parentheses
* significant at 5%; ** significant at 1% (one tailed)
Fixed effects for individuals and time periods included but not shown