86877098 well foundation
DESCRIPTION
hiiTRANSCRIPT
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Chapter 7. Well Foundations
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Introduction
Well foundations are being used in India from very early days. Taj Mahal was built on such foundations. Wells are classified as deep foundations. The main difference between a well and a pile foundation is that, while a pile is flexible like a beam under horizontal loads, the well undergoes rigid body movement under such loads.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Types of Wells
Wells have different shapes and accordingly they are named as
1. Circular Wells
2. Dumb bell
3. Double-D Wells
4. Double Octagonal Wells
5. Single and Double Rectangular Wells
6. Multiple Dredged Holed Wells
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Components of Well Foundation
The various component of a well foundations are
1. Cutting Edge
2. Well Curb
3. Bottom Plug
4. Steining
5. Top Plug
6. Well Cap
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Design of Wells
Design of wells basically involves finding
1. Depth of the well
2. Size of the well and
3. Design of the other components.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Depth of Scour
Well foundations are constructed in river beds, they should be taken to a safe depth well below the anticipated scour level. Scour around piers depends on several factors like flood discharge, the angle of attack of the flow, flow obstruction etc. The scour depth is calculated as follows.
(mm) bedriver in particle soil ofdiameter Mean D
D1.76 factor Silt s
/s)(m dischargeDesign q
(m)depth Scour D
where
473.0
m
mf
3
s
31
f
s
s
qD
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Values of Silt Factor
Type of material Mean diameter (mm) sf
Coarse silt 0.04 0.35
Fine sand 0.08 0.5
Fine sand 0.15 0.68
Medium sand 0.3 0.96
Medium sand
0.5 1.24
Coarse sand
0.7 1.47
Coarse sand
1 1.76
Coarse sand
2 2.49
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
The foundation should be taken well below the scour level to protect it from any movement due to the force of the stream and other external forces.
welloflength GripD
.3
1
sDD
Grip Length for Wells
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Size of Wells
The size of dredge hole of a well varies. In small and shallow wells, the minimum diameter of the dredge hole should be 1.8 m. In larger wells, the minimum size of the dredge hole should be 3 m. The final size is decided after satisfying the lateral stability condition of the wells.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Bearing Capacity of Wells
levelscour below foundation wellofDepth
wellofdimension maller
valueSPT Corrected
)(kN/mcapacity bearing afe
where
100
)D]N16(100B[5.4Nq
failureshear against
safety for valueN itson based sandsfor pressure bearing
allowablefor formula following therecommends 3955 IS
2a
22
a
D
SB
N
Sq
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
This is subjected to different types of stresses. At the sinking it is subjected to water and earth pressure. At dredging stage, inside surface is subjected to water pressure while outside surface to the earth pressure. IRC recommends some rules of thumb for fixing the thickness of steining which are given below.
Steining
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
etc. shale kankar, boulders,for 1.20
clayfor 1.15
claysoft for 1.1
stratasandy for 1.0
where
)12.001.0(T
wellsD-double andr rectangulaFor 2.
well theofdiameter External
wellofHeight
etc. shale kankar, boulders, clay, hard
including strata hardfor 1.25
claysoft andsilty sandy,for 1.1
where
)1.001.0(T
wellsshaped-dumbbell andcircular For 1.
steining concreteCement
H
k
Dk
D
D
k
DDk
H
e
eH
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
clay hardfor 1.25
claysoft for 1.1
sandfor 1.0 k
where
40
D
8
DkT
SteiningBrick
He
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
The curb of a well transfers all the superimposed loads to the soil through the cutting edge while sinking. The material used for curbs may be timber or RCC. The forces acting on well curb are shown in Fig(b). The total horizontal force on the well curb on both sides is
well theof angle Internal
steining of line centre thealonglength unit per
curb and wellof Weight W
wellofdiameter Internal D
where
2
DDWcot
ie
i
Curb
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
The cutting edge is provided at the bottom of the well below the curb to cut through the soil during sinking. It is generally made of steel and welded to an angle iron to fit the outer dimensions of the well steining. The height of the cutting edge is given by
concrete of stress ecompressiv Safe f
edge cutting of Thickness t
rock ofstrength Crushing
where
tanfh
c
c.
.e
u
u
q
tq
Cutting Edge
The value of is usually taken as 300. The choice of this angle has been proved to be suitable for easy access to the cutting edge.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Bottom Plug
After final grounding of the well to the required foundation level, a concrete plug is provided. The bottom plug transfer the entire load to the ground. The bottom plug functions as an inverted dome supported along the periphery of the steining. As it is not feasible to provide reinforcement at the bottom, it is generally made thick and a rich concrete mix (M20) is used.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Sand Filling
The bottom plug concrete is cured and after curing, the well is filled with sand in saturated condition. Sand filling provides
1. Stability to the bottom of the well.
2. Eliminate the tensile forces at the base
3. Cancels hoop stresses induced in steining
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Top Plug
The top plug is provided after the filling is completed. Top plug helps in transferring the load of the pier and superstructure to the steining. The thickness of the top plug is generally kept greater than 50 % of the smaller dimension of the dredge hole. If sand filling is used, the top plug is simply constructed using PCC of 1:2:4 otherwise it is reinforced with steel bars and lean concrete of 1:3:6 is used.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Well Cap
As the shape of the well pier and cap are different, the well cap forms an interim layer to accommodate the pier. The well cap is so designed that the base of the pier is provided with a minimum all round offset. The centre of the well cap is made to coincide with that of the pier and not with that of the well. Such positioning nullifies the effect of the minor shifts which might have occurred during well sinking.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Stability Analysis of Well Foundations
A well foundation supporting a bridge pier is subjected to vertical and horizontal forces. The various forces acting on the well are
1. Self weight of the well and its superstructure
2. Live loads
3. Water currents and buoyancy
4. Temperature, wind and earth quake
5. Breaking and tracking forces
6. Resistance of the well walls
7. Base and skin friction
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Terzaghi (1943) gave an approximate solution based on the analysis of the free rigid bulk.
Resolve all forces in vertical direction and obtain the resultant PV.
Resolve the forces in two horizontal directions i.e along and across the pier and get the values of PB and PL
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
The resultant vertical force PV and the resultant horizontal force PB are considered for analysis.
The forces and earth pressure distribution acting on the well are shown in the figure.
Pressure at any depth z below the scour level is
'
')(p
DKDPz
zKKKz
D
ap
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
The well is assumed to fail as soon as the soil reaction at the bottom is equal to PD. For equilibrium at that instant
)3(2932D
Dfor Solving
(2) 3
'22
1
3'
2
1 )(
Eabout moment Taking
(1) )2('2
1 )(
'22
1'
2
1
BCF of area-AEF of area
length unit per pressure totalofresultant )(
112
11
1
11
21max
1max
12
max
DHDHH
DDDK
DKDHP
DDDKP
or
DDKKD
P
B
B
B
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
)(D
1 tan
asgiven is well, theof
line centre theof deflectionangular then the
nts,displaceme horizontal theare and If
)(P veconservati
a yields forces frictional theseofOmision
walland base at thefriction no is There 3.
tscoefficien pressureearth sRankine' are K and K 2.
headbulk light a as treatedis wellThe 1.
sassumption
followingon based is theory This F.safety offactor
aby P reducingby obtained becan depth safeA
force. horizontal
maximum esustain th torequiredlength grip the
is D This D.for solving and (1)equation in D Putting
21
21
max.B
aP
D
1
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Stability Analysis of a Heavy Well
In the Terzaghi approximate analysis, it is assumed that the bulkhead tends to rotate about some point O above the lower edge and tends to transfer the soil from elastic to plastic equilibrium. But in case of heavy wells embedded in cohesionless soil, the well is assumed to rotate about its base and the assumed pressure distribution is given in Fig(a). Taking the moment about the base, the value of (PB)max
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
DH
DDDKP
DH
DKKP
B
aPB
)(''
6
1 )(
asgiven then is force resistance maximumequivlant
The Fig(b).in shown ison distributi pressure
The scour. ofdepth normal thehalf toequal be
toassumed bemay and assess todifficult very is
Ddepth surcharge The surcharge. a as acts soil
uncovered thegs,surroundin well theBeyond
place. takesscouring well, thearoundNormally
)('6
1 )(
22
max
2
3
max
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
base. at the occurs tension no assuming soil theof
capacity bearing safe n thekept withi be should
pressure foundation maximum The
base well theof modulussection z
base wellof Area A
frictionskin and
buoyancy for allowance makingafter
base wellon the loaddirect net theis W
where
f
iscondition moment goverturnin no for the well
theof base at the f pressure maximum The
2. than less benot shouldsafety offactor The
)(Pa
asgiven is
F safety, offactor a allowingafter force resisting
total the well, theoflength or diameter theis d If
max
A
W
F
dPB
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
dK''
2FP
2F
dyK''P
thenlevel,
maximum thebelowy depth aat zero is force
shear theIf zero. is forceresultant thewhere
occurs steining on themoment maximum The
a
2
a
y
or
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
IRC and IS Design Recommendations
The IRC and IS 3955 publications recommend the following procedure for design of well foundations in sand deposits (for clay the expressions should be suitably modified)
1 Check the stability of well under working loads, assuming elastic theory
2. Find the factor of safety of the well against ultimate failure using ultimate load theory
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Causes of Tilts and Shifts
1. Nonuniform bearing capacity
2. Obstruction on one side of the well
3. Sand blowing in wells during sinking. It will cause sudden sinking of well
4. Method of sinking: Material should be removed from all sides equally otherwise the well may experience tilt
5. Sudden sinking due to blasting may also cause tilting of well
6. Irregular casting of steining will cause less friction on one side leads to chances of tilting of well.
CE- 471: Foundation Engineering
Rectification of Tilt
1. Eccentric grabbing
2. Eccentric loading
3. Water jetting
4. Arresting the cutting edge
5. Pulling the well
6. Strutting the well
7. Pushing the well by jacks