7-1 copyright 2009, john wiley & sons, inc. chapter 7: capacity and facilities capacity...
TRANSCRIPT
7-7-11Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chapter 7: Capacity and FacilitiesChapter 7: Capacity and Facilities
Capacity Planning Basic Layouts Designing Process Layouts Designing Service Layouts Designing Product Layouts Hybrid Layouts
7-7-22Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Capacity
Maximum capability to produceMaximum capability to produce Capacity planningCapacity planning
establishes overall level of productive establishes overall level of productive resources for a firmresources for a firm
3 basic strategies for timing of capacity 3 basic strategies for timing of capacity expansion in relation to steady growth in expansion in relation to steady growth in demand (lead, lag, and average)demand (lead, lag, and average)
7-7-33Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Capacity Expansion Strategies
7-7-44Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Capacity (cont.)
Capacity increase depends on volume and certainty of anticipated demand strategic objectives costs of expansion and operation
Best operating level % of capacity utilization that minimizes unit costs
Capacity cushion % of capacity held in reserve for unexpected
occurrences
7-7-55Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Economies of ScaleEconomies of Scale
it costs less per unit to produce high levels of output fixed costs can be spread over a larger number of
units production or operating costs do not increase
linearly with output levels quantity discounts are available for material
purchases operating efficiency increases as workers gain
experience
7-7-66Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Best Operating Level for a Hotel
7-7-77Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Facility LayoutFacility Layout
Minimize material-handling costs Utilize space efficiently Utilize labor efficiently Increase capacity Facilitate communication and interaction Incorporate safety and security measures Provide flexibility to adapt to changing conditions Increase quality
Arrangement of areas within a facility to:
7-7-88Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
BASIC LAYOUTS
Process layouts group similar activities together
according to process or function they perform
Product layouts arrange activities in line according to
sequence of operations for a particular product or service
Fixed-position layouts are used for projects in which product
cannot be moved
7-7-99Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Process Layout in ServicesProcess Layout in Services
Women’s lingerie
Women’s dresses
Women’s sportswear
Shoes
Cosmetics and jewelry
Entry and display area
Housewares
Children’s department
Men’s department
7-7-1010Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Manufacturing Process LayoutManufacturing Process Layout
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
LM
M
M
M
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
G
G
G
G
G
G
A A AReceiving andShipping Assembly
Painting Department
Lathe DepartmentMilling
Department Drilling Department
Grinding Department
P
P
7-7-1111Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
A Product LayoutA Product Layout
InIn
OutOut
7-7-1212Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Description
Type of process
Product
Demand Volume Equipment
Description
Type of process
Product
Demand Volume Equipment
Sequential arrangement of activities
Continuous, mass production, mainly assembly
Standardized, made to stock
Stable High Special purpose
Process
Comparison of ProductComparison of Productand Process Layoutsand Process Layouts
Functional grouping of activities
Intermittent, job shop, batch production, mainly fabrication
Varied, made to order
Fluctuating Low General purpose
Product
7-7-1313Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Workers Inventory
Storage space Material handling Aisles Scheduling Layout decision Goal
Advantage
Workers Inventory
Storage space Material handling Aisles Scheduling Layout decision Goal
Advantage
Limited skills Low in-process, high
finished goods Small Fixed path (conveyor) Narrow Part of balancing Line balancing Equalize work at each
station Efficiency
Process
Comparison of ProductComparison of Productand Process Layoutsand Process Layouts
Varied skills High in-process, low
finished goods Large Variable path (forklift) Wide Dynamic Machine location Minimize material
handling cost Flexibility
Product
7-7-1414Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fixed-Position LayoutsFixed-Position Layouts
Typical of projectsTypical of projects Equipment, workers, Equipment, workers,
materials, other materials, other resources brought to the resources brought to the sitesite
Highly skilled laborHighly skilled labor Often low fixed costOften low fixed cost Typically high variable Typically high variable
costscosts
7-7-1515Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Designing Process LayoutsDesigning Process Layouts
Goal: minimize material handling costsGoal: minimize material handling costs Block DiagrammingBlock Diagramming
minimize nonadjacent loads minimize nonadjacent loads use when quantitative data is availableuse when quantitative data is available
Relationship DiagrammingRelationship Diagramming based on location preference between areasbased on location preference between areas use when quantitative data is not availableuse when quantitative data is not available
7-7-1616Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Computerized layout Computerized layout SolutionsSolutions
CRAFT Computerized Relative Allocation of Facilities
Technique CORELAP
Computerized Relationship Layout Planning PROMODEL and EXTEND
visual feedback allow user to quickly test a variety of scenarios
Three-D modeling and CAD integrated layout analysis available in VisFactory and similar software
7-7-1717Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Designing Service Layouts
Must be both attractive and functional Types
Free flow layouts encourage browsing, increase impulse purchasing, are flexible
and visually appealing Grid layouts
encourage customer familiarity, are low cost, easy to clean and secure, and good for repeat customers
Loop and Spine layouts both increase customer sightlines and exposure to products,
while encouraging customer to circulate through the entire store
7-7-1818Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Types of Store LayoutsTypes of Store Layouts
7-7-1919Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Designing Product Layouts
Objective Balance the assembly line
Line balancing tries to equalize the amount of work at each
workstation Precedence requirements
physical restrictions on the order in which operations are performed
Cycle time maximum amount of time a product is allowed to
spend at each workstation
7-7-2020Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Desired Cycle Time, Desired Cycle Time, Cd
Cd = production time available
desired units of output
Cd = (8 hours x 60 minutes / hour)
(120 units)
Cd = = 4 minutes480
120
7-7-2121Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Flow Time vs Cycle TimeFlow Time vs Cycle Time
Cycle time = max time spent at any station Cycle time = max time spent at any station Flow time = time to complete all stationsFlow time = time to complete all stations
1 2 3
4 minutes4 minutes 4 minutes4 minutes 4 minutes4 minutes
Flow time = 4 + 4 + 4 = 12 minutesFlow time = 4 + 4 + 4 = 12 minutesCycle time = max (4, 4, 4) = 4 minutesCycle time = max (4, 4, 4) = 4 minutes
7-7-2222Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Efficiency of Line
ii
ii = 1= 1
ttii
nCnCaaEE = =
ii
ii = 1= 1
ttii
CCddNN = =
EfficiencyEfficiency Minimum number Minimum number of workstationsof workstations
wherewhere
ttii = completion time for element = completion time for element ii
jj = number of work elements= number of work elementsnn = actual number of workstations= actual number of workstations
CCaa = actual cycle time= actual cycle time
CCdd = desired cycle time= desired cycle time
7-7-2323Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Line Balancing RulesLine Balancing Rules
Use heuristics to assign tasks to Use heuristics to assign tasks to workstationsworkstations Longest processing time (LPT) ruleLongest processing time (LPT) rule
(Pick the feasible task with the LPT) (Pick the feasible task with the LPT) Most number of following tasks ruleMost number of following tasks rule
(Pick the feasible task with the (Pick the feasible task with the largest number of following tasks)largest number of following tasks)
Ranked positional weight ruleRanked positional weight rule
7-7-2424Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Designing Product Layouts – Designing Product Layouts – con’tcon’t
Step 1:Step 1: Identify tasks & immediate predecessors Identify tasks & immediate predecessors
Step 2:Step 2: Determine output rate Determine output rate
Step 3:Step 3: Determine cycle time Determine cycle time
Step 4:Step 4: Compute the Theoretical Minimum number of Compute the Theoretical Minimum number of StationsStations
Step 5:Step 5: Assign tasks to workstations (balance the Assign tasks to workstations (balance the
line)line)
Step 6:Step 6: Compute efficiency, idle time & balance delay Compute efficiency, idle time & balance delay
7-7-2525Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Step 1:Step 1: Identify Tasks & Identify Tasks & Immediate PredecessorsImmediate Predecessors
Example 10.4 Vicki's Pizzeria and the Precedence DiagramImmediate Task Time
Work Element Task Description Predecessor (secondsA Roll dough None 50B Place on cardboard backing A 5C Sprinkle cheese B 25D Spread Sauce C 15E Add pepperoni D 12F Add sausage D 10G Add mushrooms D 15H Shrinkwrap pizza E,F,G 18I Pack in box H 15
Total task time 165
7-7-2626Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Layout CalculationsLayout Calculations
Step 2:Step 2: Determine output rateDetermine output rate Vicki needs to produce 60 pizzas per hourVicki needs to produce 60 pizzas per hour
Step 3:Step 3: Determine cycle timeDetermine cycle time The amount of time each workstation is allowed to The amount of time each workstation is allowed to
complete its taskscomplete its tasks
Limited by the bottleneck task (the longest task Limited by the bottleneck task (the longest task in a process):in a process):
sec./unit 60
units/hr 60
sec/min 60x min/hr 60
units/hroutput desired
sec./day time available)(sec./unit time Cycle
hourper pizzasor units/hr, 72sec./unit 50
sec./hr. 3600
time task bottleneck
time availableoutput Maximum
7-7-2727Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Layout Calculations (continued)Layout Calculations (continued)
Step 4Step 4:: Compute the theoretical minimum Compute the theoretical minimum number of stationsnumber of stations TM = number of stations needed to achieve TM = number of stations needed to achieve
100% efficiency (every second is used)100% efficiency (every second is used)
Always round up (no partial workstations)Always round up (no partial workstations) Serves as a lower bound for our analysisServes as a lower bound for our analysis
stations 3or 2.75,
nsec/statio 60
seconds 165
time cycle
times taskTM
7-7-2828Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Layout Calculations (continued)Layout Calculations (continued)
Step 5Step 5:: Assign tasks to workstationsAssign tasks to workstations Start at the first station & choose the Start at the first station & choose the longest eligible tasklongest eligible task following following
precedence relationshipsprecedence relationships Continue adding the longest eligible task that fits without going over the Continue adding the longest eligible task that fits without going over the
desired cycle time desired cycle time When no additional tasks can be added within the desired cycle time, begin When no additional tasks can be added within the desired cycle time, begin
assigning tasks to the next workstation until finishedassigning tasks to the next workstation until finishedWorkstation Eligible task Task Selected Task time Idle time
A A 50 10
B B 5 5
C C 25 35
D D 15 20
E, F, G G 15 5
E, F E 12 48
F F 10 38
H H 18 20
I I 15 5
1
2
3
7-7-2929Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Layout Calculations (Continued) Layout Calculations (Continued)
Step 6Step 6:: Compute efficiency and balance delayCompute efficiency and balance delay Efficiency (%) is the ratio of total productive time Efficiency (%) is the ratio of total productive time
divided by total timedivided by total time
Balance delay (%) is the amount by which the line Balance delay (%) is the amount by which the line falls short of 100%falls short of 100%
91.7%100sec. 60x stations 3
sec. 165
NC
t (%) Efficiency
8.3%91.7%100%delay Balance
7-7-3030Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hybrids LayoutsHybrids Layouts
Cellular layouts group dissimilar machines into work centers
(called cells) that process families of parts with similar shapes or processing requirements
Flexible manufacturing system automated machining and material handling automated machining and material handling
systemssystems which can produce an enormous variety of items
Mixed-model assembly line processes more than one product model in one
line
7-7-3131Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Cellular Layouts
1.1. Identify families of parts with similar Identify families of parts with similar flow pathsflow paths
2.2. Group machines into cells based on Group machines into cells based on part familiespart families
3.3. Arrange cells so material movement Arrange cells so material movement is minimizedis minimized
4.4. Locate large shared machines at Locate large shared machines at point of usepoint of use
7-7-3232Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Parts FamiliesParts Families
A family of A family of similar partssimilar parts
A family of related A family of related grocery itemsgrocery items
7-7-3333Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Original Process LayoutOriginal Process Layout
CA B Raw materials
Assembly
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10
11
12
7-7-3434Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Part Routing MatrixPart Routing Matrix
MachinesParts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A x x x x xB x x x xC x x xD x x x x xE x x xF x x xG x x x xH x x x
Figure 5.8Figure 5.8
7-7-3535Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Revised Cellular LayoutRevised Cellular Layout
3
6
9
Assembly
12
4
8 10
5
7
11
12
A C BRaw materials
Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3
7-7-3636Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Reordered Routing MatrixReordered Routing Matrix
MachinesParts 1 2 4 8 10 3 6 9 5 7 11 12
A x x x x xD x x x x xF x x xC x x xG x x x xB x x x xH x x xE x x x
7-7-3737Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Key:Key:
SS = Saw= SawLL = Lathe= LatheHMHM = Horizontal milling = Horizontal milling
machinemachineVMVM = Vertical milling machine= Vertical milling machineGG = Grinder= Grinder
Paths of three Paths of three workers moving workers moving within cellwithin cell
Material Material movementmovement
InIn OutOutWorker 1Worker 1
Worker 2Worker 2
Worker 3Worker 3
Direction of part movement within cellDirection of part movement within cell
S
L
HM
VM
G
VM
L
Final inspection
Finished part
A Manufacturing Cell with Worker PathsSource: J.T. Black, “Cellular Manufacturing Systems Reduce Setup Time, Make Small Lot Production Economical.” Industrial Engineering (November 1983).
7-7-3838Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Automated Manufacturing CellAutomated Manufacturing Cell
Source: J. T. Black, “Cellular Manufacturing Systems Reduce Setup Time, Make Small LotProduction Economical.” Industrial Engineering (November 1983)
7-7-3939Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages and Disadvantages of Cellular Layoutsof Cellular Layouts
AdvantagesAdvantages Reduced material Reduced material
handling and transit timehandling and transit time Reduced setup timeReduced setup time Reduced work-in- Reduced work-in-
process inventoryprocess inventory Better use of human Better use of human
resourcesresources Easier to controlEasier to control Easier to automateEasier to automate
DisadvantagesDisadvantages Inadequate part familiesInadequate part families Poorly balanced cellsPoorly balanced cells Expanded training and Expanded training and
scheduling scheduling of workersof workers
Increased capital Increased capital investmentinvestment
7-7-4040Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Flexible Manufacturing Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMS)Systems (FMS)
FMS consists of numerous programmable machine tools connected by an automated material handling system and controlled by a common computer network
FMS combines flexibility with efficiency FMS layouts differ based on
variety of parts that the system can process size of parts processed average processing time required for part
completion
7-7-4141Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Full-Blown FMS
7-7-4242Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mixed Model Mixed Model Assembly LinesAssembly Lines
Produce multiple models in any order Produce multiple models in any order on one assembly lineon one assembly line
Issues in mixed model linesIssues in mixed model lines Line balancingLine balancing U-shaped lineU-shaped line Flexible workforceFlexible workforce Model sequencingModel sequencing
7-7-4343Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Copyright 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Balancing U-Shaped LinesBalancing U-Shaped Lines
A B C
D E
Precedence diagram:Precedence diagram:
Cycle time = 12 minCycle time = 12 min
A,B C,D E
(a) Balanced for a straight line(a) Balanced for a straight line
9 min9 min 12 min12 min 3 min3 min
Efficiency = = = .6666 = 66.7 %Efficiency = = = .6666 = 66.7 %24243636
24243(12)3(12)
12 min12 min 12 min12 min
C,D
A,B
E
(b) Balanced for a U-shaped line(b) Balanced for a U-shaped line
Efficiency = = = 100 %Efficiency = = = 100 %24242424
24242(12)2(12)