54207 what the future may bring

Upload: metfis

Post on 03-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 54207 What the Future May Bring

    1/4

    What the Future

    May Bring

    W I N T E R 2 0 1 3 V O L . 5 4 N O . 2

    R E P R I N T N U M B E R 5 4 2 0 7

    Intelligence

    A review of Jorgen Randers new book, 2052: A Global Forecast for

    the Next Forty Years, written by John Sterman.

  • 7/29/2019 54207 What the Future May Bring

    2/4

    WINTER 2013

    MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW 13SLOANREVIEW.MIT.EDU

    [BOOK REVIEW]

    What the Future May BringIn his latest book, sustainable development expert Jorgen Randers offers an analysisof what the world will be like in the year 2052. Its not a pretty picture.BY JOHN STERMAN

    Many authors writing about the future dismiss doubts and con-

    trary opinions, striving with provocative titles such as The End of

    History and the Last Man (by Francis Fukuyama) or The Singularity

    Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology(by Ray Kurzweil) to per-

    suade readers that the future they envision is not only plausible butinevitable. Thankfully, Jorgen Randers foregoes this temptation in

    his new book,2052: A Global Forecast for the Next Forty Years (White

    River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2012).

    Randers, an expert on business and sustainable development

    and currently a professor of climate strategy at BI Norwegian

    Business School, offers a nuanced analysis of the state of the world

    today and a forecast for global development for the coming de-

    cades. Its not a pretty picture. Writing in the first person, Randers

    is not shy about discussing his worries about the resource, envi-

    ronmental and societal challenges the world faces. I have lived my

    whole adult life worrying about the future, Randers admits. His

    candor and expertise, gained over decades of work in sustainable

    development for businesses and governments, yield a book well

    worth reading and discussing with colleagues, friends and family.

    In an interesting twist, Randers invited other experts to share

    their thoughts on the world of 2052. Their views on topics includ-

    ing population, food, energy, urbanization, culture, the future of

    capitalism and the role of spirituality are presented throughout

    the book as Glimpses. Randers also invites readers to participate:

    Through an associated website, www.2052.info, he provides his

    models for you to examine and modify.

    So what does Randers expect the world of 2052 to be like? First,

    some background. In 1972, Randers, then a doctoral student at MIT,was one of the authors, along with William W. Behrens III, Dennis L.

    Meadows and the late Donella H. Meadows, of the groundbreaking

    bookThe Limits to Growth. Drawing on system dynamics work

    pioneered by Jay W. Forrester, Randers and his coauthors developed

    a simulation model that integrated population, economic activity,

    resources and the environment and then used it to examine future

    scenarios. The results suggested (1) that business as usual would

    most likely result in the collapse of the global economy and human

    population before 2100, (2) that there were ways to avoid that

    outcome and create a sustainable society, and (3) the sooner socie

    committed to a sustainable path, the more likely we would succee

    The Limits to Growth, commissioned by the Club of Rome, an inte

    national think tank, was an international bestseller and becam

    both enormously influential and controversial. (Disclosure: I stu

    ied under Dennis and Donella Meadows as an undergraduate

    Dartmouth College, currently direct the MIT System Dynami

    Group and have known Randers for more than 30 years.)

    The debate continues 40 years later. Some people point to th

    tremendous growth in technology, increasing wealth and the ri

    of China and other emerging economies to argue that hunger an

    poverty will soon be a memor y. Others argue that this much

    needed progress has come through the unsustainable exploitatioand degradation of the resources and ecosystems upon which

    species, including ours, depend.

    A sustainable society cannot consume renewable resources fast

    than they regenerate, cannot spew wastes into the environment fast

    than they break down and are rendered harmless and, in the lon

    run, cannot rely on nonrenewable resources at all. But humanity vi

    lates all these basic laws of physics. Today, we are overwhelming

    dependent on nonrenewable resources, especially fossil fuels. T

    resulting greenhouse gas emissions are (Continued on page 1

    Randers predictsthat the climatewill continue tochange, leadingto more extremeweather eventsand floods.

    http://www.sloanreview.mit.edu/http://www.sloanreview.mit.edu/
  • 7/29/2019 54207 What the Future May Bring

    3/4

    14 MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEWWINTER 2013 SLOANREVIEW.MIT.EDU

    I N T E L L I G ENCE

    rapidly changing the climate. Tropical forests continue to fall for fire-

    wood and farms. We have already overshot the limits. As Randers

    points out, by 2010 humanitys global ecological footprint reached

    about 1.4 times the carrying capacity of the earth we need 1.4planets to sustain the current population and economy. That deficit

    is financed by unsustainable depletion of natural capital. Like a fiscal

    deficit, the party cannot go on forever. Unlike a financial crisis, nature

    does not do bailouts.

    More troubling, our ecological footprint is growing. World pop-

    ulation has increased from less than 4 billion in 1972, when The

    Limits to Growth was published, to more than 7 billion today. The

    United Nations forecasts population will exceed 9 billion by 2050.

    Randers instead expects population will peak before 2052, much

    earlier than most people expect, at about 8.1 billion, an outcome

    premised on optimistic assumptions about future fertility rates.Families will increasingly be able to have exactly the

    number of children they want because of steady

    improvements in education, health and contracep-

    tion, he writes. Urbanization will speed the fertility

    decline: Negative practical experience from a

    crowded urban environment will win over old reli-

    gious teachings that evolved when humanity was still

    puny and toiling on the land, he writes.

    Although population growth remains important,

    Randers correctly points out that environmental deg-

    radation is powerfully driven by increasing impact

    per person. Real economic output has been growing

    at an average rate of around 3.5% per year worldwide far faster

    than population and far faster in emerging economies. Billions of

    people in the worlds poorest nations legitimately seek the food,

    clean water, housing, health care, electricity and opportunities we

    take for granted. They aspire to the cars, air conditioners, flat-screen

    TVs, jet travel and consumption the Western lifestyle entails, while

    we in the developed world want even more than we have now. As the

    West pursues more while China, India, Indonesia, Brazil and other

    developing nations become more affluent, our already unsustain-

    able ecological footprint will grow further, setting the stage for a

    harder, deeper and less predictable decline.Many argue that free markets and technology will save the day.

    Randers celebrates the power of markets and innovations that

    are, for example, making wind and solar power competitive with

    energy from fossil fuels. But he also recognizes the long

    delays in the system. It takes decades to replace unsustainable

    capital stocks and infrastructure and to commercialize new tech-

    nologies not to mention the long lifetimes of atmospheric

    greenhouse gases. Moreover, Randers recognizes that market fail-

    ures and politics further delay or prevent action. Many resources,

    from open-access fisheries to the climate, are subject to the trag-

    edy of the commons, in which overexploitation is the result of

    rational behavior by individuals, businesses and nations. Over-

    coming the tragedy is possible, though solutions have so farproven elusive for critical issues such as climate change.

    In reflecting on the years since the initial publication ofThe Limits

    to Growth, Randers discusses the consequences of the delays, market

    failures, political expediencies, disinformation campaigns by vested

    interests and other forces that have prevented the world from pursu-

    ing sustainable development. With sadness, he concludes that we will

    continue stumbling down that path, responding mostly reactively,

    mostly parochially and mostly too late. As a result, the climate will

    continue to change, sea levels will continue to rise and resource con-

    flicts will intensify, all of which will cause an increasing drag on the

    economy. Although per capita income will continue to grow for awhile, particularly in the developing world, Randers

    expects growth in the developed world, including the

    United States, to stagnate as companies increasingly

    move jobs and capital to lower-cost regions, the aging

    population worsens fiscal stress and environmental

    challenges become more acute.

    Readers may be disturbed by Randers conclusion

    that democracies are ill-suited to address pressing

    global problems, and that authoritarian govern-

    ments such as that of China may be better able to act

    for the long term and respond faster to emerging

    threats. Some readers may think that Randers has too

    rosy a view of authoritarians as benevolent despots. If thats the case,

    he counters, the outlook for the world is even darker.

    As Randers explains, My forecast of global developments to

    2052 is actually quite gloomy. Not catastrophic. But, he notes, the

    worst consequences of delay and policy failure will manifest only

    later; around 2052, the average per capita consumption level will

    peak and a worldwide decline in material standards will start.

    But it neednt be: Overshoot and collapse is solvable at least in

    principle. But it is hard to solve in practice, because forward-looking

    policy normally requires sacrifice today to get a better tomorrow.

    Although he expects that we will not rise to the challenge, he hopesthat we will. His concluding words: Please help make my forecast

    wrong. Together we could create a much better world.

    John Stermanis the Jay W. Forrester Professor of Management at

    MIT Sloan School of Management and director of the MIT System

    Dynamics Group. Comment on this article at http://sloanreview.mit.

    edu/x/54207, or contact the author at [email protected].

    Reprint 54207.

    Copyright Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2013. All r ights reserved.

    What the Future May Bring (Continued from page 13)

    http://www.sloanreview.mit.edu/http://www.sloanreview.mit.edu/
  • 7/29/2019 54207 What the Future May Bring

    4/4

    PDFs Reprints Permission to Copy Back Issues

    Articles published in MIT Sloan Management Review arecopyrighted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    unless otherwise specified at the end of an article.

    MIT Sloan Management Review articles, permissions,and back issues can be purchased on our Web site:

    sloanreview.mit.edu or you may order through our

    Business Service Center (9 a.m.-5 p.m. ET) at the

    phone numbers listed below. Paper reprints areavailable in quantities of 250 or more.

    To reproduce or transmit one or more MIT Sloan

    Management Review articles by electronic or

    mechanical means (including photocopying or archivingin any information storage or retrieval system) requires

    written permission.

    To request permission, use our Web site:

    sloanreview.mit.edu),or

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Call (US and International):617-253-7170

    Fax: 617-258-9739

    Posting of full-text SMR articles on publicly accessible

    Internet sites is prohibited. To obtain permission to post

    articles on secure and/or password-protected intranet sites,e-mail your request to [email protected].

    Customer ServiceMIT Sloan Management Review

    238 Main Street E48-570Cambridge, MA 02142