53j 1tsweeiiee 010 aug l 8 1982 - ontario53j 1tsweeiiee 010 received aug l 8 1982 mining lands...

53j 1tsweeiiee 010

RECEIVEDAUG l 8 1982

MINING LANDS S tCTION

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LTD.

SACHIGO PROPERTY, N. W. ONTARIO

REPORT ON OVERBURDEN DRILLING AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSES

OF BASAL TILL, BEDROCK CHIPS, LAKE SEDIMENT AND ORGANIC SAMPLES

ROBERT VALLIANT, PH.D. LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LTD. 485-145 FRONT STREET WEST TORONTO, ONTARIO

AUGUST 12, 1982

J

CONTENTS

Summary

Location and Access

Introduction and Previous Work

Survey and Analytical Methods

Basal Till Geochemistry

Rock Fragment Geochemistry

Lake Sediment and Organic Sample Geochemistry

Discussion and Conclusions

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Location and Claim Map

Figure 2. Location of Cut Lines

Figure 3. Sample Location/Overburden Thickness Histogram

Figure 4. Sample Location Map

Figure 5. Au Content Histogram, Basal Till

Figure 6. Basal Till Au-Ag Geochemistry Map

Figure 7. Ag Content Histogram, Basal Till

Figure 8. Cu Content Histogram, Basal Till

Figure 9. Basal Till Cu-Ni Geochemistry Map

Figure 10. Ni Content Histogram, Basal Till

Figure 11. Pb Content Histogram, Basal Till

Figure 12. Basal Till Pb-Zn Geochemistry Map

Figure 13. Zn Content Histogram, Basal Till

Figure 14. Rock Fragment Sample Location Map

Figure 15. Ag Content Histogram, Rock Fragments

Figure 16. Rock Fragment Au-Ag Geochemistry Map

Figure 17. Cu Content Histogram, Rock Fragments

Figure 18. Rock Fragment Cu-Ni Geochemistry Map

Figure 19. Ni Content Histogram, Rock Fragments

Figure 20. Pb Content Histogram, Rock Fragments

Figure 21. Zn Content Histogram, Rock Fragments

Figure 22. Rock Fragment Pb-Zn Geochemistry Map

Figure 23. Au Content Histogram, Lake Sediments

Figure 24. Ag Content Histogram, Lake Sediments

Figure 25. Cu Content Histogram, Lake Sediments

Figure 26. Ni Content Histogram, Lake Sediments

Figure 27. Pb Content Histogram, Lake Sediments

Figure 28. Zn Content Histogram, Lake Sediments

Figure 29. Lake Sediment Geochemistry Map

Figure 30. Organic Material Geochemistry Map

Figure 31. Au Content Histogram, Organic Material

Figure 32. Ag Content Histogram, Organic Material

Figure 33. Cu Content Histogram, Organic Material

Figure 34. Ni Content Histogram, Organic Material

Figure 35. Pb Content Histogram, Organic Material

Figure 36. Zn Content Histogram, Organic Material

SUMMARY

Basal till sampled during a winter overburden drill program on

mining claims KRL 510205 to 510209 incl., KRL 503358 to 503368 incl and

adjacent ground was analysed for Au, Ag, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn. Bedrock

fragments, lake sediment and organic material were sampled where avail

able and analysed for the same elements to aid in interpretation of

basal till geochmeistry.

Three areas of significant metal content were identified during

the survey. The first contained Au in basal till near station 21+00 W -

3+00 S. Au abundance may be due to an adjacent bedrock source or SW

transport of till from the Sachigo Gold Mine. A single sample contain

ing 1690 ppm Au at station 19+00 W - 10+00 S is unexplained. The second

is base metal-rich and occurs as a broad ESE-trending area through the

center of Foster Lake. Adjacent bedrock is mafic in composition and

not known to contain significant quantities of base metal sulphides. The

third is base metal-rich and occurs at Dorothy Lake immediately SW of ESE-

trending V.L.F. and input conductors. Bedrock is intercalated mafic,

felsic and sulphide-rich sedimentary rock.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Sachigo River property is 250 miles north of Red Lake, Ontario

in the Aljo Lake Area, District of Kenora. It consists of 16 mining

claims numbered KRL 510205 to 510209 incl. and 503358 to 503368 incl

(fig. 1). These are centered at 54 0 30'40" latitude, 91 0 24'30" longi

tude within N.T.S. sheet 53J 11.

The most direct access is provided by bush plane from Red Lake

to Dorothy Lake.

INTRODUCTION AND PREVIOUS WORK

The Sachigo property contains the Sachigo River Exploration Co.

gold mine which, during 1938 to 1943 produced 52,560 oz. Au and 6,127

oz. Ag from 46,416 tons of ore (Edwards, 1944). The property has been

dormant since 1943 with limited surface exploration and diamond drill

ing conducted by Flint Rock Mines Ltd. (1961), Great Plains Development

Co. Ltd. (1972), Canadian Nickel Co. Ltd. (1974) and Huntex Ltd. (1978,

1979). Airborne magnetic surveys by the Geological Survey of Canada

(1965, 1966) and an Input MK IV survey flown for Great Plains .provide

regional geophysical data. Results of these surveys are on file at

the resident geologists office, Red Lake, Ontario.

Geological surveys of the Sachigo River area began with Meen (1937)

who described the west part of the Blackbear River - Ellard Lake green

stone belt. The area received little attention until Bennett and Riley

(1969) published a short description of the area. Geology of the mine

is described by Edwards (1944) and the mine property was mapped at l inch

to 200 feet by Flint Rock Mines Ltd. (1961). Summary descriptions and

production figures of the Sachigo Mine from 1937 to 1943 are contained

in O.D.M. annual reports.

Long Lac Mineral Exploration Limited optioned the property in the

spring of 1980 to re-evaluate its potential to contain economic gold

mineralization. Magnetometer, V.L.F. and geological surveys were con

ducted over the mine area. The magnetometer survey was necessary be

cause a previous survey (Flint Rock Mines Limited, 1961) did not cor

relate with geological data. V.L.F. surveying was conducted as a rapid

means to detect disseminated sulphide mineralization. Results of these

surveys are also on file at the resident geologist's office, Red Lake,

Ontario. Rock crops out near the mine area but most of the claim block

and adjacent ground is muskeg covered.

Basal till sampling using a portable overburden drill was carried

out during the winter of 1982 to detect near bedrock geochemical anomalies.

This sampling technique is suited to areas of extensive muskeg cover where

soil horizons are not well developed. Samples were taken throughout the

claim block and across adjacent ground to provide adequate sampling to

determine regional metal content of basal till.

SURVEY AND ANALYTICAL METHODS

Overburden drilling at TOO m stations on 45 km of NE cut and picketted

line (fig. 2) was carried out during January and February, 1982 by two,

two-man crews. This work was conducted over mining claims KRL 510205 to

510209 incl. and KRL 503358 to 503368 incl. as well as adjacent ground.

Men and equipment were contracted through R. Cornier and Associates Ltd.,

Becancour, Quebec. A gas-driven Pionjar percussion drill with l meter

drill rods and a through flow sampler was used to obtain basal till samples.

Rods were extracted using a 10 ton hand jack. The sample chamber used was

30.5 cm long with a 5 cm inside diameter. Two samples averaging 800 to

1,000 gm each were taken at each site. Where obtainable, bedrock chips

varying from 10 to 50 gm in total weight were sampled. Samples of or

ganic material or lake sediment were taken at locations where no till

horizon was present. Overburden thickness varies between O and 9 m at

over 400 sample sites (fig. 3). Overburden thickness varies between 10

and greater than 16 m at less than 30 locations.

A heavy mineral separate was taken from each basal till sample.

The separate was crushed, split and analysed by AA spectrometry for Au, p^ for

Ag, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn at Chimitec Limited Laboratories, Quebec. Bedrock

chip samples were crushed to 200 mesh and also analysed by AA spectrometry

for Au, Ag, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn. Au determinations are semi-quantitative

and precission is, at best, 10 ppb dueto low gold abundance in most samples

and small bedrock chip sample size.

BASAL TILL GEOCHEMISTRY

Basal till was sampled at 438 stations (fig. 4). A total of 386

samples were analysed for Au, 437 for Ag, Ni and Pb and 438 for Cu and

Zn. Au content in all but 4 samples was less than 50 ppb (fig. 5) and,

therefore, difficult to quantitatively assess using AA spectrometry. The

largest Au values obtained were 1690 ppb, 200 ppb, 75 ppb and 55 ppb at

stations 19+00 W - 10+00 S, 21+00 W - 2+00 S, 21+00 W - 3+00 S and 31+00 W -

5+00 S respectively (fig. 6).

Ag content is from 0.0 to 0.3 ppm in most samples (fig. 7), however,

14 samples have greater than 0.7 ppm Ag. The anomalous Ag content occurs

at the north part of the survey area, outside the Sachigo claim block

(fig. 6).

Cu abundance in basal till samples has a positively skewed distribu

tion (fig. 8) with a mode at approximately 30 ppm. Samples with the great-

est Cu content occur north of the Sachigo claim block near Dorothy

Lake. Six samples with Cu content greater than 200 ppm are within the

claim block and roughly define an ESE-trending area through Foster Lake

(fig. 9). Three samples with greater than 200 ppm Cu occur near the

south end of lines 25+00 W, 29+00 W and 31+00 W. Ni content of basal

till samples averages approximately 40 ppm (fig. 10). Thirteen samples

contain greater than 100 ppm Ni, however, only two of these at the south

end of lines 100+00 W and 19+00 W are within the claim block. The

majority of anomalous Ni samples are at Dorothy Lake including a sample

from line 8+50 W, 6+00 N which contained 1860 ppm Ni.

Pb content in basal till samples has a positively skewed distribu

tion (fig. 11) with a mode between 5 and 10 ppm. Thirteen samples contain

greater than 50 ppm Pb of which 9 are north of the property in an ESE-

trending area through Dorothy Lake. Three samples from within the claim

block at stations 10+00 H - 4+00 S, 15+00 W - 3+00 S and 20+00 W - 3+00 S

contain greater than 50 ppm Pb. Zn content in the 438 samples analysed

has a slightly positive skewed distribution with a mode between 30 and 40

ppm (fig. 13). Only one sample at station 21+00 W- 1+00 S containing

greater than 150 ppm Zn is within the claim block and four other samples

at stations 10+00 W - 2+00 N, 16+00 W - 0+00, 19+00 W - 10+00 S and 20+00 W

3+00 S contain greater than 100 ppm Zn. Nine basal till samples north and

northeast of the claim block near Dorothy Lake contain greater than 150 ppm

Zn. A sample from line 1+00 W - 9+00 N contains 2760 ppm Zn and 440 ppm Pb.

ROCK FRAGMENT GEOCHEMISTRY

Samples of bedrock fragments were collected at 98 sites (fig. 14)

during the drill program. Twenty five of these were collected within the

Sachigo claim block. Au analyses are semi-quantitative because of the

small sample size. Most samples contain less than 10 ppb Au and none

are greater than 30 ppb. Ag content ranges from not detectable to 0.5

ppm (fig. 15) and one sample at station 9+00 W - 6+00 N contains 0.8

ppm Ag {fig. 16). Cu content of rock fragments varies considerably

(fig. 17). Eight samples from near Dorothy Lake contain greater than

100 ppm Cu. Five samples taken near Foster Lake (fig. 18) contain greater

than TOO ppm Cu. Cu is a maximum of 372 ppm at station 16+00 W - 3+00 S.

Also, three samples from the southwest part of the survey area contain

greater than 100 ppm Cu. Ni content of rock fragments varies from O to

70 ppm (fig. 19) with 3 samples from stations 5+00 W - 0+20 S, 8+60 W -

6+00 N and 26+00 W - 10+00 N having between 102 and 480 ppm Ni. The

majority of rock fragment samples contain non-detectable amounts of Pb

(fig. 20). The remainder contain between l and 19 ppm Pb. Zn content of

rock fragments averages approximately 40 ppm and only 4 samples contain

greater than 100 ppm Zn (fig. 21). These 4 samples are from north of the

claim block at lines 5+00 W - 8+50 N, 8+60 W - 6+00 N, 11+00 W - 7+00 N

and 26+00 W - 10+00 N (fig. 22).

LAKE SEDIMENT AND ORGANIC SAMPLES

Lake sediment and surface organic material overlying bedrock was

sampled when no basal till was encountered. Nineteen lake sediment samples

were collected, 9 of which are from within the claim block. Figures 23 to

28 are histograms of Au, Ag, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn concentrations respectively.

Only one sample at station 25+00 W - 0+00 contains greater than l ppm Ag.

Pb is l to 5 ppm in most samples, however, at station 9+00 W - 5+00 N Pb

is 39 ppm (fig. 29). The same sample contains 140 ppm Zn. Zn is 113 ppm

at station 5+00 W - 4+00 N, however, Zn content is below 60 ppm for the

majority of samples.

Organic material overlying bedrock was sampled at 27 locations

(fig. 30), eleven of which are within the Sachigo claim block. Au values

are semi-quantitative and less than 10 ppm for all samples (fig. 31).

Ag content of the organic material averages less than 0.2 ppm {fig. 32)

but samples from stations 4+00 W - 3+00 S, 4+00 W - 2+00 N s 5+00 W -

4+00 N, 6+00 W - 10+00 S and 6+00 W - 9+00 N all contain from 5 to 10 ppm

Ag. Cu content of most samples ranges between O and 20 ppm (fig. 33).

Samples from stations 4+00 W - 3+00 S, 9+00 W - 9+00 S and 31+00 W -

10+00 S contain greater than 50 ppm Cu. Ni is erratically distributed

between 2 ppm and 44 ppm (fig. 34). Pb averages 3 to 4 ppm in most samples

(fig. 35) but is greater than 30 ppm at stations 9+00 W - 6+00 S , 11+00 W -

6+00 S and 21+00 W - 8+00 N. Zn content of organic material averages

approximately 20 to 30 ppm (fig. 36) but is greater than 80 ppm at stations

5+00 W - 4+00 N and 21+00 W - 8+00 N.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of the overburden drill program was to detect areas

of high metal content in basal till which would indicate bedrock gold

occurrences similar to the known Sachigo gold mine.

The geology of the survey area is not well understood due to exten

sive muskeg cover. The Sachigo claims are underlain by intercalated

basalt, gabbro and thin tuffaceous interflow sedimentary rock. The

interflow sedimentary rock may contain up to 10^ pyrrhotite, 2^ pyrite

and traces of chalcopyrite. Ore at the Sachigo River gold mine was er

ratic quartz veins separated by schist or brown feldspar porphyritic

dacite with blue quartz eyes and occurred between a massive coarse grain

ed footwall flow and a fine grained hanging wall flow. Edwards (1944)

described three types of quartz in ore:

1) dark blue-grey, narrow lenses containing pyrite, sphalerite,

pyrrhotite and galena. Gold averaged 4 ounces per ton and

silver was up to 25 ounces per ton.

2) grey-white quartz lenses which averaged 7 feet wide and up to

150 feet in vertical extent. The veins contain pyrite, chalco

pyrite, pyrrhotite, sphalerite and galena. Fine disseminated

Au was near vein contacts giving an average grade of 0.5 to

l.0 ounces per ton.

3) clear, friable, glassy quartz containing very low Au which was

associated with pyrite. In places, coarse Au flakes were near

dacite contacts and minor amounts of chalcopyrite and galena

were reported.

The south central part of the claim block is underlain by a quartz

monzonite to quartz diorite stock with an outcrop area of 1800 feet by

800 feet. The rock contains discontinuous quartz-tourmaline-pyrite veins,

Plagioclase and quartz crystal-bearing dykes and sills, similar in

appearance to the stock intrude most volcanic rocks on the property. In

tercalated basalt, feldspar porphyry and felsic tuff is north of the

Sachigo claims. Drill hole data (Canadian Nickel Co. Ltd., 1974; Great

Plains Development Co. Ltd., 1972) indicate that the tuffaceous rocks may

contain up to 202? pyrrhotite, V/o pyrite, graphite and minor amounts of

chalcopyrite and sphalerite. Glacial striations measured on outcrop with

in the claim block are oriented approximately SW.

Au content of basal till did not reflect the presence of the Sachigo

gold mine near the mine site, however, the 3 samples containing abundant

Au detected near station 21+00 W - 3+00 S may indicate SW transport of

auriferous material from the mine area. Small abundances of Cu, Pb and

Zn coincident with Au tend to confirm this hypothesis. A single Au anomaly

at the south of line 19+00 W is unexplained. A small amount of Ni and Zn

were also detected in this sample. Ag content is greatest in samples ESE

of Dorothy Lake. Pb values are above background coincident to high Ag

values but in general the base metals Pb, Zn, Cu and Ni all define a broad

anomalous area throughout the northeast part of the survey area. The ele

vated base metal content in basal till to the northeast probably reflects

the intercalated felsic tuffaceous rock and sulphide-rich rock reported

in drill core by Great Plains Development Co. Ltd (1972) and Canadian Nickel

Co. (1974). Base metal content is greatest in samples from immediately ad

jacent to or beneath Dorothy Lake and southwest of an ESE-trending series of

input and V.L.F. conductors. Assay values of drill core samples are not

reported, however, basal till geochemistry suggests that the bedrock conduc

tors are base metal sulphide-bearing. Base metal-rieh basal till samples

from within the claim block are distributed over a large area and are not

coincident with input or V.L.F. conductors. Also, the nearby bedrock

observed during geologic mapping is predominately basalt with very little

intercalated sulphide-rich rock.

Rock chip samples were relatively small and analytical results may

not be representative of that area of bedrock sampled. However, Cu and

to a lesser extent Pb and Zn content is greatest in samples near Dorothy

Lake and near the center of the claim block. Both areas are coincident

with the areas considered to be anomalous based on basal till geochemistry.

Au and Ag content is minimal in all rock chip samples analysed. Samples of

lake sediment and organic material exhibit erratic metal content compared

to metal content in basal till. The sample population of lake sediment

and organic material is also relatively small making it difficult to assess

the significance of isolated samples containing above average metal con

tent. The lake sediment sample with the greatest metal content is from the

west bank of Dorothy Lake within the area of base metal enrichment defined

by basal till sampling.

It is concluded that;

1) Basal till samples are both individually large enough and have a

large enough sample population to give useable geochemical results.

2) One area near the west-central part of the claim block is anomalous

in Au. The large Au abundance may be due to SW glacial transport

of auriferous material from near the mine area.

3) A single sample from southwest of the property contains a large

abundance of Au and is geologically unexplained.

4) A broad area of abundant base metal content in basal till is at

Dorothy Lake SW of sulphide-bearing bedrock geophysical conductors.

The base metals in basal till are probably derived from the adja

cent sulphide-rich bedrock. Bedrock underlying the base metal-rich

basal till is intercalated mafic, felsic and chemical sedimentary

rock.

5) A poorly defined area of base metal enrichment in basal till is

SE-trending through the center of Foster Lake. Bedrock source

of the base metals is unknown but assumed to be to the northeast.

Bedrock underlying the base metal-rich basal till is predominately

mafic in composition.

6) Base metal-rich bedrock fragments are near both locations where

basal till is enriched in metal content suggesting that the basal

till is derived from a local source.

Figure 1: Location and Claim map

5l0209i5l020BI5l0207l 5102061510205

KRL ' KRL ' KRL l KRL l KRLl ' l-l l l |503362| 50336 l |503360 ]503359|503358^L-.r....-l-, — —4- —

KRL ' ——

1503368^5033671503366 !503365 l 503364l503363l

FIGURE 3

1 20 BASAL T ILL

100

80

aGo i/)

60

40

20

6789

Overburden Thickness

(meters)

10 n 12 13 14 15

L : Less than N.D. Not detected E,l. Sample too small

BASAL TILL

FIGURE 5 FIGURE 7

1 40

130-

120-

1 10-

100-

90-

i) 80-0.

o 70-(/)o 60-6^ 50-

40-

30-

20-

10-

Au

180 -

424 Samples

i /u -

160 -

150 '

140 -

1 TO -1 tj W

120-

1 10 -100-

m t 90-F ftA -i- o \Jo 00 70-V-

0 60 -ciz 50 -

40-

30-

20-

10-•™" ' ii-l —— i —— l -

Ag437 Samples

^ l1 r l i i i i

E.I. L5

Au (ppb)

N.D. .1 . 2 . 3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .7*

Ag (ppm)

FIGURE 8

BASAL TILL

Cu100

90

80

* 70-(baE 60 o

uO

o 506 2 40 -

30 -

20-

10 -

—— 1

438 samples

_J—|--

— i — i — i — i — \ — i — i — i — i — i — i — i — 1=1 — 1=3 — i — (1111=4 — 1 — i — i — 1=1 — i — i — F^ — i — i — i — i — i — i — 1=3 — l — P^50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Cu(ppm) 400*

BASAL Tl L L

FIGURE 10

150 -140 -

130 -

120 -no-100-

90 -

S 80-Q.E 70 -D

00 60 -*fr-

o 50 -

z 40 - 30-

20-

10 -

0 .^

Ni437 Samples

^T-^J-

f\ y^i i

10 l 30 ' 5020 40 60 80 100

Ni (ppm)

No.

of

Sa

mp

les

-7. b O OJ

O

TJ CT

^

—

O"D TJ 3

O sj

O

oo ooooooo oooooo

-H—

—i—

—l—

—i—

—i—

—i—

H—

—l—

—i—

—l—

—'—

—l—

—l—

—i—

—t-

cn

-Jo

o-l —

— l

00

vDo

ol —

— I-

O

—

fu

W

is.o

o

o

o

o—

l--t

-

w l "^

l cr

C0

> en

> i-

CD

cr 33 m

FIGURE 13150 -

140 -

130 -

120 -

110-

100 -

90 - in(D"o.

E 80-0

"o 70-p

60 -

50 -

40 -

30-

20-

10 -

^

BASAL TILL

Zn438 Samples

, —— t —— i

hi

— i — i — i — i — i — i — — F i — i i — 1=1 — 1=1 — i — i — — r i — i — i — i — i ii — i — P^I — i — i — i — i — 1^=5 — i — i — i — i — i — . — —50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Zn

FIGURE 15

ROCK 8, ROCK FRAGMENTS

40 T

Ag96 Samples

30--

aE o00

oz

20 -

10 --

N.D. .1 .3 .4 .5*

Ag (ppm)

ROCK b ROCK FRAGMENTS

Cu

FIGURE 17

25 T

20--

15"

aE o

x 10--

5 --

4-

4 6 8 10

94 Samples

20

Cu (ppm)

l l i l l40 60 l 80 ' 100

30 50 70 90l 300 ' 500

200 400

FIGURE 19

30 T ROCK fi, ROCK FRAGMENTS

Ni

25--

20--

o.E o

LO

bz

15--

10--

5--

98 Samples

l 9 l 8 10

2030

4050

60 80 10070 90 200

300

Ni(ppm)

60 T

50--

FIGURE 2 0

ROCK Si ROCK FRAGMENTS

Pb

40 -- 96 Samples

J? 30'aE o

LO

OZ 20--

10 --

N.D. 6 7

Pb (ppm)

8 10 11 12 15 16

FIGURE 21

ROCK i ROCK FRAGMENTS

Zn

20 -r

96 Samples

15--

10t; "aE oU)

oz

10--

5--

20 30 40

Zn (ppm)

50 60 70 80*

FIGURE 23

LAKE SEDIMENTS

Au

20 T

J? aE o i/)

O 7.

15- 13 Samples

10--

10 15 20

Au(ppb)

25 30 35 40

FIGURE 24

LAKE SEDIMENTS

Ag

10 T

o"o.

E o i/)

oz

c .. 19 Samples

.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 9

Ag (ppm)

FIGURE 25

LAKE SEDIMENTS

Cu

3 -- 19 Sampleso.E o i/)

2 -

l --

O 10

Cu (ppm)

15 20

FIGURE 26

LAKE SEDIMENTS

Ni

19 Samples

— "a

E o to

oz

5--

0 10

Ni (ppm)

20

LAKE SEDIMENTS FIGURE 27

Pb

10 T

19 Samples

J?a6 o10

oz

5-

N.D. 6*

Pb (ppm)

FIGURE 28LAKE SEDIMENTS

Zn

ST

19 samples

4 --

34 aE o

10

oz 2--

1 --

10 20 30 40 50

Zn (ppnr.)

60 70 80 80*

FIGURE 31

ORGANIC SAMPLES

Au

20 T

LO

—aE o

oz

10--

27 Samples

O L1 L3 L4 L5 L6

Au(ppb)

L7 L8 L9 L10 10

FIGURE 32

ORGANIC SAMPLES

Ag

27 Samples

CLED

10--

oZ

5--

N.D.l —— l —— hH —— h O .1 .2 .3 .4 10 11

Ag (ppm)

FIGURE 33

ORGANIC SAMPLES

Cu

15-r 27 Samples

injl)aE o i/)

oZ

10"

S--

10 20 30

Cu(ppm)

40 50

4 --

FIGURE 34

ORGANIC SAMPLES

Ni

3--

aE o

oo' 2 •z.

1 --

27 Samples

8 9

Ni (ppm)

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17*

10 T

If aE o

Oz

5--

ORGANlC SAMPLES

Pb

27 Samples

FIGURE 35i

N.D. 1

(PPm)

ORGANIC SAMPLES

Zn

FIGURE 36

15'

Q. 1 0

E o 10

oZ

5--

10

27 Samples

20 30

Zn (ppm)

50 60 70 70*

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

laV)D

8S, o

Type of Survey(s) Overburden Drilling to sample basal till Township or Area AM o Lake Area______________ClaimHoider(s) C. Warren Hunt. 1119 Sydenham Rd. S.H..

Calgary. Alta.-^——-——^.————-——Survey Company Long Lac Mineral Exploration Ltd. t——— Author of Report Robert I. Valliant, Ph.D.,-,.^.—^———. Address of Author P.O. Box 156, Toronto, Ont.———————.Covering Dates of Snrwy 15 Jan/82 - l Aug/82.-————^^——

(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line P.nt 53.650 Feet, or approx. 10 miles

SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

DAYS ~ , . , per claimGeophysical —Electromagnetic— Magnetometer _ .,.

—Radiometric/ino — Other ^"

Opnlnpiral

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

nATR- 12 Aug.. 1982. SIGNATURE:.Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol. .Qualifications. O

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

,KR.L.........5033.58.(prefix)' "

503359

503360

503361

50336^2

503364

503365

503366

503367

503368

510205

510206

510207

510208

510209

(number)

TOTAL CLAIMS. 16

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one suwey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations ———-————^-^——————————^— -Number of ReadingsStation interval ————^————-——————...——- ..Line spacingProfile scale _________________________________________ . -—-^-^Contour interval.

C

g

O

N

Instrument.Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___

ELECTROMAGNETK("Ir*}] rnnfigiiratinn

flnil separation

hmirfiry .

Method: Q Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back D In lineFreqnenry

(specify V.L.F. station)

C] Parallel line

Parameters measured.

Instrument.Scale constant.

Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument ———————————————————————————————————————————— Method D Time Domain d Frequency Domain

Parameters - On time ___________________________ Frequency —————-Off time ____________________________ Range.— Delay time ——————————————————————————

o,Q tf

Electrode array.

Integration time.

Power —

Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIAL Instrument^—-———————-——————-.—^-.—.-.———.———.——..———. Range.Survey Method ̂ ——-—-——-———————^———^-————————-—.—————-—..——

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured.

Energy windows (levels)———^———^.^^——-^—^——^.^..—-——————.———.———.Height of instrument—-.—-—.^-.——,.——...^^—....——^—...———.Background Count,Size of detector—^^--—————^———^^——-—^———^—^—.-.-^.^-—^^..—.^—.—.Overburden -^^——.—^---———-----———-————-^——^————-^—^^-^——^^——^

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey———^———-^—^——————————.— Instrument ——-^^————^^————-————————— Accuracy-——..———^—————^———————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ————

Instrument(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy—————^——^—..————(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used .^^—^——^———^———————————————————

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Spacing—— Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken. 16

Total Number of Samples

Type of Sample

204

rQCkt

Average Sample Weight.

Method of Collection—

basa1 till

30.5 cm x 5 cmthrough flow chamber

Soil Horizon Sampled organic, Hakbasa1.. t 1' 1 ]' bedrock, surface e sediment

Horizon Development.Sample Depth avera 9e 4 *o 5 metres Tprrain Muskeg-———-————

Drainage Development————————————

Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____

6S taken 0" cut Vines asillustrated on sample location map. Depth to bedrock is noted at each basal till sample location. ————

ANALYTICAL METHODS

per cent p.p. m. p. p. b.

D ag OS cu,ni,pb,zn fxl au

i^Co, (Ag,.)Mo, As.-(circle)T -ta^c^*"^

Dthprs AU

Field Analysis (. .tests)

Extraction Method.

Analytical Method-

Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory Analysis

No. ..—^—^..—. .tests)

Extraction Method.

Analytical Method .

Reagents Used —-—.

Commercial Laboratory (.

Name of Laboratot

Extraction Method

Analytical

Reagents

Chimltec Ltee.

A.A. (Au--F.A.-A.A.

HNO,-HC1

-tests)

General

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

1933 04 12

Your file:

Our file: 2 .4992

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesOntario Government BuildingBox 324Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2MO

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with state ments listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder .of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLands Administration BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

A. Barr:se Encls:

cc: Lac Minerals Limited Toronto, Ontario

cc: C. Warren Hunt Calgary, Alberta

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 4 Lands Commissioner

845

For further Information, If required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Ministryof Notice of Intent NaturalResources for Technical Reports

Ontario

1983 04 12

2.4992

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

84G (6'ZYSI

fa(j\ M inistry ot ' Technical Assessment F"e C^ Sources Work Credits 2.4992

1983 04 12

Recorded Holder

MR. C. WARREN HUNTTownship or Area ^ ̂ ̂

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

GeophysicalElectromagnetic days

Magnetometer days

Radiometric . days

Induced polarization . days

Section 86 (18) days

Geoloaical days

Geochemical 30 days

Man days D Airborne ED

Special provision S) Ground SI

[X] Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

di Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

KRL 503358 to 68 Inclusive 510205 tp 09 Inclusive

Special credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LI not sufficiently covered by the survey L J Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 86(181-60:

828

368-4H 36fl-4tJh- - ~ —L ^ - -J 3j! l KRL l KRL K

LEVITT r AREA M-33 r

/-—•x '.V.'is.;'(®;- /TReport o'f Work

The Minima ActP.

Instrurtionr - ?.(-^:r ts'fti v)f prin:

py.'.'i'U; s ;)H'j(- ci tri.s IOTT;, ;. Note: — On;y dayt cifoiti caiculalf

"E xf)-.:nciitLJfer" sectiori may t't r in the " Expend. Days Cr." c oil

— Do not use shaded areas below.

OVERBURDEN DRILLING, GEOCHEM SAMPLING S ASSAYING ! "TlJcT'LAKE AREA /ty, ^^2 3

MR. C. WARREN HUNT

1119 SYDENHAM ROAD, S. W.

'Prospector's Licence No.

T-664

, CALGARY, ALBERTA, T2T OT5f. u r ve y Company

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATIONMarne ana Address of Author (of Geo Technical reportl

ROBERT VALLIANT, PH.D., LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLOFCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

Geophysical

For fcrst survey: r , - E iectr onEnter 40 days. (This ' includes line rutting) . Magneic

For each additional survey: : a I 0r" using the same grid:

- Other Enter 20 days (for each)

Geological

Geochemical

Days per Claim

nflonet J c

meter '

Rt ne

"""40"~

Man Days Days per Geophysical j~.

Complete reverse side . ,, , . - Electromagnet c and enter total(s) here

R EC El W|V L. Vo* " * Kfediom

OLD ' 7~tfJ8Ev V- 1 r"

Geological 4 f* r s*

NDXARVr

Pter - -2tric

TION rAirborne Credits Days per

Claim

Note: Special provisions Electromagnetic credits rio not apply f ~ ' ' —to Airborne Surveys Magnetometer

Radiometric

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

ASSAYING l O VERBURDEN DRILLINGPerfo"R8Lon5TO5*8 - 68 INCL.

KRL 510205 - 9 INCL.Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S 17,561.48 -^ 1 5

Total Days Credits

32nstructions

Toxa! Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim se ercied in columns at right.

Date Recorded Holoer o r Agent (Signature)

SEPT. 7 /s? iJ"; , ,c, l . ; ,," .Certification Verifying Report of Work ,

(

Date of Survey

15 . 1Dav j Mo. ^

.ATION, P.

from Bi to

82 j 1Kr. j Day

0. BOX

i CJ v

IE

Total Miles of line Cut)8 82 10o. i Yr.

)6, TORONTO, ONTARI 0Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

KRL 503358503359

~5 03360"""

; 503361

'503362 l "T03363"

503364

i" 503 365

i 503366

503367

'~ 51 0205~ ~~~

510206

510207 "510208"" "~

' 5f0209 "~'~~

R f 's

^ - r"-'- j U v v -

Expend. Days Cr.

32

32^

32 ""

3T"

32 "37"

T?" 32"

: .•. ' v.

^019®M: l4iv

i

— — ————

1

4

fi

^-^for O ffice Use Only ^~To*WDays Cr. Recorded

^ s~l

l/^/

***——*^

Date,Jiecoroed S

^.A^ov.a*H.co,o.o

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

^) NJ,

\ ^ \)\\ ^ Vr^ T^N V.i \

*4-i. tt::::K•^k

H ——.s~3"\-\—— ~

••5^5^1 1 V -

^ ^ft* Jki ^.^-- .

Expend. Davs Cr.

- —————

•---- —

Total number of mining claims covered by this J. D report of work.

Mininjpr^Recorder, ^̂^ *

f^&f/^-t^ ̂

hereby certify that 1 have a personal arid intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same ciuring and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.\c-mf: finn Postal Address of Person Certifying

ROBERT VALLIANT, PH.D. , LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDP.O. BOX 156, TORONTO, ONTARIO

Date Certified

SEPT. 7 /82Certified by (Sipnature) ^,

' . r t- V

136? (B 1/9)

1983 04 12 2.4992


Dear Sir:

RE: Geochemical Survey and Assaying on Mining Claims KRL S033S8 et al 1n the area of Aljo Lake.

The Geochemical Survey and Assaying assessment work credits as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly.

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management BranchWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

A. Barr:se


cc: C. Warren Hunt Calgary, Alberta

cc: Resident Geologist Red Lake, Ontario

Ends:

fatj\ M inistry oi technical Assessment Ffie VSl^esources Work Credits 2.4992

1983 04 12Recorded Holder

MR. C. WARREN HUNTTownship or Area

ALJO LAKE

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

GeophysicalElectromagnetic days i

Magnetometer. days

Radiometric days

Induced polarization days

17(19) SectionJBBXXKX S6e *CrOSS day*

Geoloaical days

Geochemical days

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision S3 Ground SD

|~1 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

S17,561.48 spent on Assaying and overburden 1 drilling on Mining Claims:

KRL 503358 to 68 Inclusive 510205 to 09 Inclusive

1171 assessment work days are allowed which may be grouped 1n accordance with Section 76(6) of the Mining Act R.S.O. 1980.

For the Mining REcorder's use.

The work assignment for each of the above listed 16 claims 1s 73 days per claim.

Special credits under section 86 (15a) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

l _ l not sufficiently covered by the survey l _ l Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 86(181-60:

828

Action Memo

Date

D ^'"(CD Hold

pi ['lease Call r "j W ill

._ Returned ,—.U Your Call U Wish

Message Taken By

Call Back'" ] rn Wa7ting~ m Person

les Appointment l [JwasHere

r~| Will L-' Return

File Q] D raft Fleply For [~~| Provide [~~| For Your

My Signature More DetaHs Information

r-i , f . m For Your Approval j—i Keep Me i—i ^ -[J Type Oral, U a ndSl9na!l ,;o D ( n)ormed D Per Discussion

H Type Final [^| Circulate. Initial Q Tak e Q Per Your Request

t—1 " L J and Return '—' Appropriate Action '—'

D Returned With Thanks

D

Make r—i Return p-i Note and CoiHt", ——'— LJ W lth Comments I—I See Me

M f'lcase Answer H '""^"S 310 [1 Nolc a i

LJ L-" and Rcporl L~' Return

Comments

/ir" 7 P-"'r^"'O O C?-

7!,.10 10,V,'(Hev 10'BO!

Ministryof GeotechnicalZoles Report

Ontario J^ Approval

File

Mining Lands Comments

(J. O..

To: Geophysics

Comments

t.

[ ^ Approved ( j Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

[) Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

T.: G.och.mis.,v

Comments

^Approved Wish to see again with corrections

l [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1593 (81/10

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDSUITE 485, 146 FRONT STREET WEST

TORONTO.ONTARIO M5J 2L7(416) 598-2538

AUG 1 8 19&

MINING LANDS SECTION

August 16th, 1982,

Mr. F.W. Matthews Mining Administrator Ontario Ministry of

Natural Resources Room 6450, Whitney Block 99 Wellesley Street W. Queen's Park TORONTO. Ontario M7A 1W3,

Dear Sir:

RE: SACHIGO RIVER PROJECT CLAIM # KRL 503358 - 68

AND KRL 510205 - 9 INCL.

Enclosed please find two copies of our assessment work report cover ing the 16 above-mentioned claims in the Aljo Lake Area. Attached is our summary of expenses for that project.

A Report of Work has already been filed with the Mining Recorder in Red Lake.

I trust that you will find this satisfactory.

Respectfully submitted,


Robert I. Valliant, Ph.D.

RIV/cmm Encl.

RECEIVEDSUMMARY OF EXPENSES - SACHIGO RIVER PROJECT 8 ™

MINING LANDS SECTIONTotal Expenses {receipts attached)

Assaying S12,884.43 Air Service Sil,167.20 DrillingLinecutting S74,050.19SamplingDrafting

Total Expenses directly incurred for project S98,101.82.

Total expenses * 15 - a llowed cost * # of claims = # days assess ment work/claim

198.101.82 6540.12 408.76 15 16 ————


TORONTO,ONTARIO M5J 2L7 (416) 598-2538

September 7th, 1982,

Mr. F. Matthews Mining Administrator Ontario Ministry of

Natural Resources Room 6450, Whitney Block 99 Wellesley Street W. Queen's Park TORONTO, Ontario M7A 1W3,

Dear Mr, Matthews:

RECEIVEDLand Management BranchCIRCULATE D COMMENTS PLEASE F j

SEP -9 1982F. F, ANDERSON

J. R. MORTON

J. C. SMITH

G. i,'HER f/AN i

k L: l URN TO R. d/: i/C)RE: SACHIGO RIVER PROJECT - ALJO LAKE AREACLAIM # KRL 503358 - 68 INCL. AND KRL

_________510205 - 9 INCL.^.^^.^^

Please find enclosed our revised application for assessment work credits from our overburden drilling and geochemical sampling survey.

As you are aware, there is no sign of a letter indicating that the total footage drilled would be considered for assessment credit purposes. Therefore, in a conversation with your Mining Recorder in Red Lake, Mr. Scott Rivett suggested I reapply our Report of Work as follows:

1. Our geochemical sampling and linecutting should allow us to apply for the maximum of 40 days credit per claim for the 16-claim group.

2. Under the "Special Provisions" section, Mr. Rivett suggested that we apply the expenditures incurred for assaying, overburden drilling (only) and drafting expenses, which would put us well over the maxi mum of 60 days credit per claim. As 28 days have already been granted with regard to assaying, I will assume that the maximum we may apply for under this provision is 32 days per claim.

Please note that the total expenditures outlined on the attached sheets, have been divided by three because the boundary of our claim group covered slightly more than one-third (1/3) of the total regional survey. As I had mentioned this to you previously (in our telephone conversation of August 19th, 1982), you indicated to me at that time that you perceived no problem in handling the survey in this manner.

...2

2...

I would like to thank Mr. Rivett and yourself for your assistance and encouragement in helping me to maximize the number of credits that we may obtain for this survey.

Hoping that this will meet with your approval, I am

Respectfully yours,


HltwDeni se M. Feeley

DMF/cmm Encl .CC:Mr. Scott Rivett

Dr. Robert Valliant

SUMMARYASSAYING AND OVERBURDEN DRILLING EXPENDITURES

SACHIGO RIVER PROJECT

1. Assaying (as per attached payment copies)

2. Overburden drilling (as per attached invoice copies)Invoice #172

#180#181#183

Drafting Expenses

total S 12,884.43

9,800.007,700.00 10,500.00 10,500.00

total S 38,500.00

total S 1,300.00

EXPENDITURE TOTAL S 52,684.43

TOTAL EXPENDITURE t 15 = ALLOWED EXPENDITURE * 3 * EXPENDITURE OF SURVEY ON CLAIM GROUP * 16 CLAIMS = TOTAL NUMBER OFDAYS CREDIT

S52,684.43 * 15 - 3512.30 * 3 * 1170.77 16 73.17

Maximum allowable credits = 6 0 days minus 28 days previously applied = TOTAL OF 32 DAYS PER CLAIM

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDSuite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156,

Royal Bank Plara, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4

**TWO THOUSAND****FIVE HUNDRED AND SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS AND 99 CENTS*

QUE NO. 2:0943

04/06/82

K*K*KK*2565.99

DATE

CO -•et ond,CD CD

EXPLORATION LIMITED

CHIMITEC LTEE700 RUE NEREE TREMBLAYSTE-FOY, QUEBEC

GIN 4H7CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE

MAIN BRANCH, COMMERCE CT., TORONTO, ONTARIO

PER:

PER:

:0809 Cheque No 20943492649274946495849684969

PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING

ININININININ

1402, 75 '785 , 75 '

127,20^.597,28'257,61

95.40

TOTAL 1*2565,99 Less ,oo Discount * *2565,99

!'

jooRNo , * C0809 R QUE NO. 20830


Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4 DATE

KXQNE THOUSAND*****ONE HUNDRED AND FORTY ONE DOLLARS AND 50 C.ENTS**

03/12/82

MKKtttt**1141 -SO

CDD— CD CD

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITED

CHIMITEC LTEE700 RUE NEREE TREMBLAYSTE-FQY, QUEBEC


MAIN BRANCH, COMMERCE CT., TORONTO. ONTARIO

PER:.

PER.

0809 Cheque No 20830 4918


TOTAL s*1141,50 Leas *0.00

IN 1141.50

Discount •a *1141.50

DOR NO p o 809

L(3NG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDSuite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156,

Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4

KKTWO THOUSAND**xxTHREE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND 20 C

ENTS**

QUENO. 1M031

04/26/82

*******2315,20

DATE

CO CD CD CD CD


CHIM1TEC LTEE700 RUE NEREE TREMBLAYSTE-FOY, QUEBEC



PER:.

PER:.

^0809 Cheque No 21031 PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING

S0395040508850895090.

INININININ

256.20199,30527.00572 . 25760,25

TOTAL 1*2315.20 Less to,oo Discount K *2315,20

IENDOR NO. C0809QUENO. 2 0976


Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4DATE 04/13/82

KK*Xtt*KK415,89

CO COooCD

K-xFOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND 89 CENTS**


o CHIMITEC LTEE700 RUE NEREE TREMBLAYSTE-FOY, QUEBEC


MAIN BRANCH, COMMERCE CT.. TORONTO, ONTARIO

PER:.

PER:

C0809 Cheque No 20976 5025

' PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING .

TOTAL 1*415,89 Less *0,00

IN 415,89

Discount * *415,89

INDORNO, .

' LON

3AY

ro

:QUE NO.

LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDSuite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156,

Royal Bank Pla/a, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4 DATE

**SIX THOUSAND**•xxFOUR HUNDRED AND FORTY FIVE DOLLARS AND 83 CENTS**

cx:04/05/82

CD CD

LONG




PER:

PER

EXPLORATION LIMITED

C0809 Cheque No 20918 4971500450055006501350165017


IN IN IN IN IN IN IN

1384,251610.00719,25743.75906,50

1018.5063,60

TOTAL 1*6445,85 Less *0,00 Discount * *6445,85

Le 20 avril 1982

TO:

RE:

Long Lac Mineral Ex suite 2105 Royal Bank Plaza North Tower ( Toronto Ontario' N5G 2G4

Att'n: D. G. Sheeha

Sachigo River proje

uc c-^j'L '~ PIG /L No. AMT.

•î^.ito y*^]\k\- li

/lO ZOO . f 5 SCO- C. v

^/4/. n

t

D/C

.J)

d/

VENDOR,^ ÔS-fit ft / .

ENTEREE)" /(' CODED ^'APPRVD. (^ L

R. -Cormier supervision, 18 days at 200 $

Drilling, 14 days, 2 crews - 350 $ encl

Demobilization, 4 days, 2crews7200 $/per day

R, Cormier - travel expense

Travelling expense - crews (2)

12 rods - lost at 25.00 $

2 samplers at 150.00 $ ^ ^^ '

Ski doo - rental - 14 days X 2 X,15.00 $

Grocerie and expense

Less advance

NOTE:

MAY O 6 1982TTC5

PAIDAcct. No. ^.,............

Date iLîy. Check No. ^.:~1

Amount to be payd on receipt see contract and return to

REAL ROYER INC.15570 boul. Becancour C.P. 210 Ste-Angele-de-Laval, P.Q. - COX 2HO /^

NO. 172

3,600.00^

9,800.00^

1,600.0(K

817.45

658.51 300.00-

300.00"

700.00

1,385.15

19,161.11^

15,000.00

a rv[PIS —. .^ - O Associes neeR. Cormier a AssOC ,atesLtdAssocies Ltee 2050 Thibault. Becancour. Que Canad.i GO" '3*T e l

i*?1F".'"'"7'~**v jfj'^** '•'f'lhKJ^^C\ R^-^n ..st* -v^* -w.^y.j'.jAssocies Ltee 2050 Thibault, Becancour, Ou6.. Canada, COX 1BOAssociates Ltd. T6I. - Phone (819) 294-9939

31 janv-L&i 19S2

To:

Re:

Long Lac Aiutt 't]Qb Royal tfanfe

Toronto Ontario N5G 2

f.G.

Lid

INVOICE

dnJJUUinQ Sac^cgo

4 dai/A mob^tcza^bn 2 cAew6 X ^200 peA day X 4 11 day* dtiWUuno, 2 cAem X. $ 350 peA day R. C otimleA Su.peAvi.A*Lon 15 a'at/4 at 5 200 p&i day 2 i fexc.c/00 fitntal at S 25 peA day 2 X S 25 X. 11 day*

expend e^ and

Net 30 days

N? 180

1,600.00

7,700.003,000.00

550.002,147.10

TOTAL S 14,997.10

MOTE: pay on A ecep-tcon o^ -6iuo-i.ee OA peA

MAKE CHEQUE PAYABLE TO: R. CORMIER 8. ASS. LTEE

a Associes Ltee 2050 Thibault, Becancour. Que.. Canada. GOX 1BO Associates Ltd. m . phone (819) 294-9939

To: Long L^c Mineral Exploration Ltd suite 2105 Royal Bank PlazaNortn TO Toronto N5G 2G4

Att's

Re: Sachigo

*-Feb v 15

wer Ontario

D. G. Sheehan

INVO

River Project

To March 2/82 ,

15 days drilling 2 crews At $ 350.00 e

R Cormier Supervision 7 days at S 200.

Lf^L- il<fi~""""~rG /L No. AMT V

CEZlo-'o *f7t Xto.f*

ÊEII^r

^;)

TicjSS^^^^-^zîî

Net 30 days

N? 181

500.00

400.00

Skidoo rental 2 X 15 days X $ 25.00

Line Cutting 14 miles at $ 200.00 per mile

Groceries, gas et supplies

750.00

2,800.00

2,050.88

A 17.500.81

J Note invoice payable on reception

MAKE CHEQUE PAYABLE TO: R . CORMIER 8* ASS. LTEE .

\ Associes Ltee 2050 Thibault, Becancour, Que., Canada, COX 1 Associates Ltd. m . Phone (819) 294 .9E

To: Long Lac Mineral Exploration Ltdsuite 2105Royal Bank PlazaNorth TowerToronto OntarioN5G 2G4

D. G.

15-02-82

FES 2 4 1532

INVOICE

Overburden drilling - Sachigo Project

Net 30 days

N?

15 days drilling 2 crews X ? 350 per day

R. Cormier supervision 10 days X ? 200 per day

2 skidoo rental at $ 25 per day 2X 25 X 15

Liwe cutting 15 miles X $ 200

Groceries S expenses

Equipement lost

$ 10,500.00

2,000.00

750.00

3,000.00

1,436.78

853.00

Fayablo sur reception aJs : R ^al H oyer Inc

15,570 131d Scicancoin Jte Angela da l"val CO. Nicolet

J

& Associes Ltee 2050 Thibault, Becancour, Que., Canada, COX 1BO Associates Ltd. Tel. - Phone (819) 294-9939

To: Long Lac Mineral Exploration Ltdsuite 2105Royal Bank PlazaNorth TowerToronto OntarioN5G 2G4

Att's: D.G. Sheehan Net 30 days

Re:

Drafting expenses

INVOICE N? 186

l,300.00 \/———————

Gil N o. AMT.

V7J i/J*

0/C

j J

V;

] D

heck Nd,.

MAKE CHEQUE PAYABLE TO: R. CORMIER 8. ASS. LTEE

' u . U o4 - j l . 12

l 7 b j O . d ol d b j y . 7 ul l S 4 t, . 4 ^l i- t. U O . O O'i t, (i ^ J . i d

4-

•t-

7 4 o j j . l y

•COR NO ' C1518f ' , t

*———~"

LONG 'LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION /LW?TED'DUE NO. 21430

1Suite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156,


R. CORMIER 6 ASSOCIATES LTD 2050 THIBAULT BECANCOUR, QUEBEC COX ISO

CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE MAIN BRANCH, COMMERCE CT., TORONTO, ONTARIO

PER:.

PER:.

DATE 0 7/19/82

' *****A***130o.OO

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION/ LIMITED

CDooCO

CD CD

C1518 Cheque Mo 21430 186


TOTAL ^1300.00 Leg* 00.00

IK

Discount

1300.00

$1300.00

RQ501A .5:QUE NO.

LONG LAC MINERAL. EXPLORATION LIMITEDSuite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156,


**FOUR THOUSAND**xxONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY ONE DOLLARS AND 11 CENTS**

21098

05/07/82

CO

CD

CD


REAL ROYER INC 15,370 BLVD BECANCOUR STE ANGELE DE LAVAL CO, NICOLET, QUEBEC

CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE MAIN BRANCH, COMMERCE CT., TORONTO. ONTARIO

PER:.

PER:.

R0501A Cheque No 21098 ' PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING

172 RE t R, CORMIER i ASSOC

TOTAL , 11 Less to,oo

IN 4161.11

Discount - *4161,11

VENDOR NO. - R 0501A I IT2I QUENO.

LONG' LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDDATE

PAY

.

Suite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156, Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4

**SEVENTEEN THOUSAND**xxFIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND 88 CENTS**

20959

04/07/83

XKXKKX17500 .88

CT3COooCD

REAL ROYER INC 15,570 BLVD BECANCOUR STE ANGELE DE LAVAL CO, NICOLET t QUEBEC



PER.

PER:.

R 0501A Cheque No 20959 PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING

181 FEB 15-MAR 2/82 (R.CORNIER t, ASSOC) IN

TOTAL 1*17500,88 Less (0,00

17500,88

Discount " *17500,88

VENDOR NO,' R 0501 A K* "

QUENO. 20779

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDCO

Suite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156, Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4 DATE 03/0-V82

CO CZ3

PAY

TO

*ffEIGHTEEN THOUSAND** KKKKXK18539.78

**FIVE HUNDRIID AND THIRTY NINE. DOLLARS AND 70 CLNTSx* . i


REAL ROYER INC 15,570 BLVD BLCANCOUR STE ANGELE DE LAVAL CO. NICOLET, qUEBHC


PER:.

PER.

R0501A Cheque No 20779 PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING

183 OVERBURDEN DRILLING IN 18539,78

TOTAL 5*18539,78 Less *0.00 Discount " il8ti39,7B

iNDORNO•OUENO.


'AY

Suite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156, Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4 DATE 02/15/82

CO OO LT7 d CD

REAL ROYER INC 15570 BOUL BECANCOUR C.P. 210STE-ANGELE-DE-LAVAL, QUEBEC COX 2HOCANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE



PER:.

PER:.

R0501A Cheque No 20716 165 180


IN IN

TOTAL :S17,548.42 Less SO.00 Discount -

2,551.3214,997.10

$17,548.42

YVENDOR NO.

R0501ACHEQUE NO.

PAY

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDSuite 2105. North Tower, P.O. Box 156,

Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto, Canada. M5J 2J4•XXF1FTEEN THOUSAND**x* DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS**

DATE

20328

11/19/81

-x-lSOOO .00

COLO

CD CDCD

REAL ROYER INC'TO 15570 BLVD PECANCGUR

BECANCGUR, QUEBEC

UOX 2HO

CANADIAN IMPERIAL SANK OF COMMERCE MAIN BRANCH, COMMERCE CT.. TORONTO, ONTARIO

1:0000R0501A Cheque No 20328


pea-.

PER.

ioi: s .'•000 l 500000/

R. CorrmerAssoci6s Lie 20,0 iu.,.Associates

R . Cor.iar SSkidoo r^n.als ^ x 1 0

vill -

200 per day - '^OOO.OO3*000.00 2,000.00

10,000.00 2,000.00

*iTlf'iATED TOTAL

5 77,000.00

: COUNTING:H..

on-his aogreemen

E TABLE:

on skis.

u b s operational

standard field .orient i

Submited by

R. Cormier

Associes Ltee 2050 Thibault, B6cancour. Ou6., Canada. COX 1 BOAssociates Ltd. Tel. - Phone (819) 294-9939

Long Lac Mineral Exploration Ltdsuite 2105Royal Bank PlaEaNorth TowerToronto OntarioN5G 2GA

Att'n: D.G. Sheehan

MAY O 6 1S52

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERNS

This is to certify that any payments or advance made to R. Cormier or

R. Cormier and Associates Ltd or Real Royer Inc. by Long Lac Minerals

Exploration were placed in a joint Bank account to pay salaries, ex

penses and any related expenditures toward the Sachigo Exploration

program.

'•'

PAR: .\ PARi

President R.Cormier Inc President Real Royer Inc

c

ji,

c o

/tNDOR NO. G1805 .OUE NO.



*AY

DATE

20946

04/06/82

CT?"53-

00 CD CD

**ONE THOUSAND** x**x*x*l795.20

**SEVEN HUNDRED AND NINETY FIVE DOLLARS AND 20 CENTS**

GREEN AIRWAYS LTD P.O. BOX 331 RED LAKE, ONT

POV 2MOCANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE

MAIN BRANCH, COMMERCE CT.. TORONTO, ONTARIO

LONG

PER:

LAC/MINERAL.X j/

C/UW^-

XPLORATION LIMITED

PER:.

G1805 Cheque No 20946 08965 08979


IN IN

1082,40712,80

TOTAL :*1795,20 Less *0,00 Discount - *1795,20

VENDOR NO. G1805DUE NO. 20970

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDSuite 2105,:North Tower, P.O. Box 156,


**THREE THOUSAND AND****SIXTY TWO DOLLARS AND 40 CENTS**

DATE 04/12/82

*K**K**3062,40

COO- COc:CD

|TO GREEN AIRWAYS LTD P.O. BOX 331 RED LAKE, ONT

POV 2MOCANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE



PER:.

PER:.

7

G1805 ^Cheque No 20970 08992 08997

PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITINQ

IN IN

1531,201531.20

TOTAL 1*3062.40 Lees *0.00 Discount - *3062,40

INDOR NO, G1305

L:ONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDSuite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156,


:QUE NO.

\Y

DATE

•xxSIX THOUSAND**xxTHREE HUNDRED AND NINE DOLLARS AND 60 CENTS**

LONG LAC

GREEN AIRWAYS LTD P,O, BOX 331 RED LAKE, ONT

CANADIAN TMPERTALBANK OF COMMERCE MAIN BRANCH. COMMERCE CT., TORONTO, ONTARIO

PER:

PER:

/

20898

04/02/82

K*XKX*X6309,60

00

CDCD

EXPLORATION LIMITED

G180S Cheque No 20898 08848 08852 03863 08897 08943


IN IN IN IN IN

1531,201531.201082.401082.401082.40

TOTAL 1*6309.60 Less *0.00 Discount - *6309,60

l J .•5 1 S.

2S6S.1141.t 4 4 S .

1 ^ l il 4 .

i' U

t 9y y608 S'1 j

-f•f-f-ft

0

6 4 . 4

OUEN0.

L(3NG"LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITED

• Suite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156, Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4

XKTWO THOUSAND**XXTHREE HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DOLLARS

AND 20 CENTS**

04/26/82

xxx-xxxx2315,20

CO CD CD CD CD


CHIM1TEC LTEE700 RUE NEREE TREHBLAYSTE-FOY, QUEBEC



PER:.

PER:.

0809 Cheque No 2103150395040 S08B 5089 5090.


TOTAL 1*2315,20 Less to,oo

IN IN IN IN IN

256.20199.50527,00572.25760.25

Discount ** $2315.20

NDOR NO. C0809XXJENO.


Royal Bank Plaza, Toronto, Canada, M5J 2J4DATE

20976

04/13/82

CO 00 00

CD

**FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND 89 CENTS**



PER:.


MAIN BRANCH. COMMERCE CT., TORONTO. ONTARIO

PER:.

If!

C0809 Cheque No 20976 5025

' PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING .

TOTAL 1*415,89 Lea* tO.OO

IN 415,89• •-.^*w- ——* —— *^ —— —— —^-~*~""""

Discount * *415,B9

•JDOR NO. C0809

LONG" LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDSuite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156,


**TWO THOUSAND**wxFIVE HUNDRED AND SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS AND 99 CENTS**

E0943

04/06/82

,99

CO•"d-OD

CD CD

EXPLORATION LIMITED




PER:

PER:.

Cheque No 20943492649274946495849684969


ININININININ

1402,75^85 , 75 "

127.20^597, 28 y257,61

95.40

TOTAL 1*2563,99 Less fO,00 Discount "s i2565.99

(DOR NO. 1 C0809



*xONE THOUSAND**

QUENO.

DATE

20830

03/13/82

KKKKKKK1141 .50

CD

CD CD

**ONE HUNDRED AND FORTY ONE DOLLARS AND 50 QENTSx*




MAIN BRANCH. COMMERCE CT., TORONTO, ONTARIO

PER:.

PER.

;0809 Cheque No 20830 4918

. PLEASE DETACH BEFORE DEPOSITING

IN

TOTAL 1 *1141.50 Less iO.OO

1141.50

Discount " *1141.50{

IN DOR NO- ^0809DUE NO.

' LONC^LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION LIMITEDSuite 2105, North Tower, P.O. Box 156,


xxSIX THOUSAND**•xxFOUR HUNDRED AND FORTY FIVE DOLLARS AND

83 CENTS**

20918

04/05/83

x*K*xx*6445,85

CD

ocCLCD C3 CD

LONG



MAIN BRANCH, COMMERCE CT., TORONTO. ONTARIO

PER:

PER:

EXPLORATION LIMITED

C0809 Cheque No 20918 4971500450055006501350165017


IN IN IN IN IN IN IN

1384,251610,00719,25743.75906,501018.5063,60

TOTAL :*6445,85 Less *0,00 Discount - *6445,85

1982 09 20 2.4992

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural RaaourcaaOntario Government BuildingBox 324Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2MO

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for a Geochemical Survey and Assaying submitted under Section 77(19) of the Mining Act R.S.O. 1980 on mining claims KRL 503358 et al in the Area o f Aljo Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be issued,

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

J. Skuratsc

cc: Long Lac Mineral Exploration Ltd Toronto, Ontario

cc: C. Warren HuntCalgary, Alberta.

- ffi


TORONTO,ONTARIO M5J 2L7(416) fj98-?638

September 7th, 1982,

Mr. F. Matthews Mining Administrator Ontario Ministry of

Natural Resources Room 6450, Whitney Block 99 Wellesley Street W. Queen's Park TORONTO, Ontario M7A 1W3,

Dear Mr. Matthews:

RECEIVEDSEP 17 1982

MINING LANDS SECTION

RE: SACHIGO RIVER PROJECT - ALJO LAKE AREACLAIM # KRL 503358 - 68 INCL. AND KRL

_________510205 - 9 INCL.^^^^^^

Please find enclosed our revised application for assessment work credits from our overburden drilling and geochemical sampling survey.

As you are aware, there is no sign of a letter indicating that the total footage drilled would be considered for assessment credit purposes. Therefore, in a conversation with your Mining Recorder in Red Lake, Mr. Scott Rivett suggested I reapply our Report of Work as follows:

1. Our geochemical sampling and linecutting should allow us to apply for the maximum of 40 days credit per claim for the Ib-claim group.

2. Under the ."Specjal^ Prpyjilons" section, Mr. Rivett suggested that we apply the expenditures incurred for assaying, overburden drilling (only) and drafting expenses, which would put us well over the maxi mum of 60 days credit per claim. As 28 days have already been granted with regard to assaying, I will assume that the maximum we may apply for under this provision is 32 days per cla.im.

Please note that the total expenditures outlined on the attached sheets, have been divided by three because the boundary of our claim group covered slightly more than one-third (1/3) of the total regional survey. As I had mentioned this to you previously (in our telephone conversation of August 19th, 1982), you indicated to me at that time that you perceived no problem in handling the survey in this manner.

...2

2...w

I would like to thank Mr. Rivett and yourself for your assistance and encouragement in helping me to maximize the number of credits that we may obtain for this survey.

Hoping that this will meet with your approval, I am

Respectfully yours,


DMF/cmm Encl .CC:Mr. Scott Rivett

Or. Robert Valliant

Den i se M. Feeley

RED t A f FWININO "'V

E C E l v- O SEP l 01982

A.M.

SUMMARY

ASSAYING AND OVERBURDEN DRILLING EXPENDITURES

SACHIGO RIVER PROJECT

1. Assaying (as per attached payment copies)

2. Overburden drilling (as per attached invoice copies)Invoice #172

#180

#183

Drafting Expenses

total S 12,884.43

S 9,800.007,700.0010,500.0010,500.00

total S 38,500.00

tota1 S ...1,300.00

EXPENDITURE TOTAL S 52,684.43

TOTAL EXPENDITURE t 15 * ALLOWED EXPENDITURE f 3 * EXPENDITURE OF SURVEY ON CLAIM GROUP f 16 CLAIMS *

S52,684.43 * 15 = 3512.30 * 3 * 1170.77 16

TOTAL NUMBER t DAYS CREDIT

73.17

Maximum allowable credits * 6 0 days minus 28 days previously applied * TOTAL OF 32 DAYS PER CLAIM

t

R E C f i -' F r

o?.

1983 05 06 ' o d[ ^ 2'4992


Dear Sir:

RE: Geochemical Survey and Assaying on Mining Claims KRL 503358 et al 1n the Area of Aljo Lake. s-oa

The Geochemical Survey assessment work credits as listedwith my Notice of Intent dated April 12, 1983 have beenapproved as of the above date* 7. Y :-- -''

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly,

S Y K

E.F. AndersonDirectorband Management Branch l-j

Whitney Block, Room 6450 C fQueen's Park j^VToronto, Ontario ^WU 1W3 fa.Phone: 416/965-1380 f r .,

A. Barr:se


cc: C.Jajcren Hunt.. ' CTTgaryT^Tberta

cc: Resident Geologist Red Lake, Ontario

C6M 6

l

- -8. 7.

*-*^-*-J**:

en

L S

,

4**^*.**-*-!: •SJ*iL*tjr.]lJ *wi."r—^j7*^nrt*-c*r^^i-

? V-;-''-V, v J ' ' 'H "'l O

91 0 30'9I 0 I5'

540 37'30" ——

00 CMfO i

UJ CC

UJ

LJZcr o

540 30' ——

KRL l KRL KRL ^..,^-KR ,

^2 O 9i 5 l O ^0 81 5 l C 2 O 7 \ 5 1 0/0 6151 O 2 O

Corking Lake

540 37'30'

540 30'

9I 0 30' J9I 0 I5'

LEVITT LAKE AREA M-3324

ID ^tro ro

Q:UJ

o: LJxCO

AREA OF

ALJO LAKE

DISTRICT OF KENORA

PATRICIA PORTION

RED LAKE MINING DIVISION

SCALE: l-INCH — 40 CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDPATENTED FOR SURFACE RIGHTS ONLYLEASESIfCENSE OF OCCUPATIONCROWN LAND SALELOCATED LANDCANCELLEDMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYHIGHWAY k ROUTE No.ROADSTRAILSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKL-GMINES

used only with summer resort locations or when space is limited

NOTES

DATE OF ISSUE

APR - 7 1983

Minislryof Nalural ResourcesTORONTO

S3J1 15*091408 200

545912 Blow Up

NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES 53 J l

PLAN NO.

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

CLAIM BOUNDARY

S3J1 aio

OVERBURDEN DRILL PLANNOTE: Stations are 100 m. apart on

each line. m LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATIONSACHIGO RIVER PROJECT

LT EE LTD

DATE

DESSINE PAR.

GEOLOGIE PAR____________________ PLANIFICATION PAP RQCH CQRMJER

REVISE' PAR——^^^-——^^——————

PLAN N2 APPROUVE PAR:

REMARQUES

FIGURE 2~- 5 00'

.0' 250' 500' 790' WOO'

rui TRAMSLA0 OO3

> \

PLAN SHOWING SAMPLES LDCATION S OVERBURDEN

' 1085(6.sou)

number

Overburden thickness (in metres )

HtTMtS

-p'"e"•soy,

,35y, f '06/

(4.35y, f '071

s.,

5 y, * '058

, rt049C.90M) f "35

f*-"o*j

Tit . (3. i H, '503

,

IA(3.,yj '005

, ftC.63M) f ' Q 33 "-'oy,

t5 ?4 i .y) f '564 ,.ft

r (7. 25 y, ''584

..'565f a. mi, f '585

' '576 (3.30y, '

'577 , (3-20yi r'56? J

1700' 3-a 3 y, '022

f5 -aoy,s,yj f '588

'562'0.40M, f '597

, (2.8 y i -l '572J 1 y, '592ln

(3.75 y, F '027( *-4oy,

,(2' 8"' 019

'664 , (6.5M) f '020

'539

CLAIM BOUNDARY

220

OVERBURDEN DRILL PLANNOTE: Stations are 100m. apart on

each line.LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATIONSACHIGO RIVER PROJECT

LT EE LTD

Z/J,

DESSINE PAR________i

GE'OLOGIE PAR—-—^——^—..——— PLANIFICAT10N P&pRQCH CQRMJER REVISE' PAR_____________

DATE

FEB-MARCH982

PLAN APPROUVE PAR:

REMARQUES

FIGURE 4500

290* 500' rao' noo'

oy-

LEGEND

GOLD 8 SILVERMethod: A.A F.A.-A.A.

-325 mesh ( heavy minerals

Au(ppb)L50

Ag (ppm)0.2

L ; Less t hanN.D : Not detectedE. I.: Sample too small

Ag43 7 Samples

(-50

(-30

L50

L50

1-5/03 ' '•V-t'.-k ' - /.'-J'-X

CLAIM BOUNDARY

53J11SWM1400 230

OVERBURDEN DRILL PU\NNOTE: Stations are lOOm. apart on


LT EE LTD

DESSINE PAR GE'OLOGIE PAR PLANIFICATIONREVISE' PAR

DATE

FEB-MARCH1982

CQRMIER

REMAROUES

FIGURE 6l": 500'

LEGEND

COPPER a NICKEL

Method: A.A. F.A.-A.A.-325 mesh { heavy minerals

Cu438 Samples

Cu(ppm).31

60

26-(Ni (ppm)

Ni (ppm)Method: A.A -150 mesh

L : Less thanN.D : Not detectedE.I : Sample too small

224 ' 4S rsi l76 r3fi 20123

f* '3*69

" " -64 ' 60 36/0

6 f22* "-'36 . 34 '

4 26 *40

29 - 30 P, '23+22

228 - 3 R

46 '22 52 /'

CLAIM BOUNDARY

Ni437 Samples

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 ICO 200 3OOJ-

Cu (ppm)


each line.

240

Ni (ppm)

m LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION

SACHIGO RIVER PROJECTLT EE LTD

OESSINE PAR______E GE'OLOGIE PAR_____________ PLANIFICATION PAR ROCH CORMIER REVISE' PAR^____________

DATE

FEB-MARCH

PLAN N2 APPROUVE

R EMARQUES

FIGURE 9

,O' Z50' 50O' 790' tOOO'

LEGEND

LEADS ZINC

Method: A.A. F.A.-A.A.-325 mesh ( heavy m inerals)

Pb(ppm) Zn(ppm)2 i 29

L : Less thanN.D : Not detectedE. l : Sample too small

26

CLAIM BOUNDARY

-t-

I5O T

Zn438 Samples

OVERBURDEN DRILL PLANNOTE: Stations are lOOm. apart on

each line.

N.D. 5 IO 20 30 40 50 60 60IO 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 IOO 20O 3OO+

Pb (ppm)Ni (ppm)

WITHES

m LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATIONSACHIGO RIVER PROJECT

LT EE LTD

DATE

R RFAUDOm FEB-MARCH 1982

DESSINE' PAR___...GE'OLOGIE PAR__^^__^____——.PLAN1FICATION P APROCH CORMJER

REVISE' PAR....._____________

PLAN N2 APPROUVE PAR

R EMARQUES

FIGURE 12l" - 5 00'

.0' v Z50' 500' 75O' lOOO'

nu

ST-4T/ON'0-00

LEGEND

ROCK a ROCK FRAGMENTS SAMPLE NUMBERS

Method : A. A. F. A -A. A. -325 mesh

s^sr sample number1592 (2.7M)

in metres

y^V^^-^^^B^^

CLAIM BOUNDARY

2S0

OVERBURDEN DRILL PLANNOTE: Stations are lOOm. apart on


L T F r

LTD

DATE

DESSINE' PAR__ ^ RFAiinniN EEB-MARCHGE'OLOGIE PAR_______________ .- - I9eg—— PLANtFiCATiON pflRRQCH CORMJER _______

REVISE' PAR.______________ _,^—^—

PLAN APPROUVE PAR

PIR EMAROOES

FIGURE 14l" B 500'

.0' 250' 500' 750' KXJO'

OJU

L30

L5

LEGEND

ROCK a ROCK FRAGMENTS GOLD 8 SILVER

Method: A.A. F.A.- A.A. - 325mesh

CLAIM BOUNDARY

Au(ppb) Ag (ppm)5 0.2

L- Less than N. Q: Not detected

530115*881484 270



DESSINE PAR__ . S BFAIinOIN

GE'OLOGI E PAR__________. _ __PLANIFICATION PARRQCH CORMJER .

REVISE PAR...____..______ ^-^

FEB^MARCH I982

PLAN APPROUVE PAR

R EMARQUES

FIGURE 16

250' 500' 750' 1000'

au

STAT 'ON JO-

LEGEND

ROCKS ROCK FRAGMENTS COPPERS N ICKEL

Method: A.A, RA.- A.A. - 325 mesh

LAIM BOUNDARY

280

Cu ( ppm)•36

Ni t ppm)41


each line.L: Less than N.D.:Not detected

m LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATIONSACHIGO RIVER PROJECT

LT E E LT D

DATE

DESSINE PAR_________S RFAIinClIM FEB -MARCH

GEOLOGIE PAR

PLANIFICATION

REVISE PAR

1982

ROCH CORMIER

PLAN N2 APPROUVE PAR:

REMAROUES

FIGURE 18= 500

2SO' 500' 750' KXJO'

TOAMSUMl OO3

/, vw

N.O.

LEGEND

ROCK a ROCK FRAGMENTS LEAD 8 ZINC

Method: A.A. RA.- A.A. - 325 mesh

CLAIM BOUNDARY

290

Pb ( ppm) Zn(ppm)2 1 44

L: Less than N.D.:Not detected



LT EE LTD

DATE

S RFAUnOIN FEB - MARCH

__1962DESSINE PAR___...

G E'O LO G l E PA R _____________...-....^^^.

PLANIFICATION PARROCH CQRMJER

REVISE' PAR.___________^.^.

PLAN APPROUVE PAR

R EMAROUE5

FIGURE 22- 5 00

230' 500' 750' lOOO'

mi THAMSLAR OD3

LEGEND LAKE SEDIMENTS SAMPLE

Method:AA FA.-AA- 80 mesh

CLAIM BOUNDARY

300

(4 M97903

Sediments

Ni (ppm)

Zn (ppm)

Ag (ppm)


each line.

L : Less t han N.D: Not d etected

LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATIONSACHIGO RIVER PROJECT

L T E E LTD

DATE

DESSi NE PAR_ S RFAUDOffl

GEOLOGIE PAR____._____........^PLANIFICATION PARfiQCH CORMIERREVISE' PAR ^ .._ ..___....____

1982

PLAN APPROUVE PAR

R EMARQUES

FIGURE 29l "s 500'

250' 500' " T5O 1 lOOO'

au

LEGEND ORGANIC SAMPLES

Method-. A.A. F.A.-A.A. -80 mesh

CLAIM BOUNDARY

Overburden

Ni (ppm)

Zn (ppm)

Ag (ppm)


each line.

L : Less than N.D: Not d etected

m LONG LAC MINERAL EXPLORATION

SACHIGO RIVER PROJECTLT EE LTD

DATE

RFAlinniN FEB-MARCH 1982

DESS! NE PAR_____GE'OLOGIE PAR.^—^^^-..————^——PLANIFICATION P AR ROCH CORMJER

REVISE' PAR_______________________

PLAN N2 APPROUVE PAR

R EMAROUES

FIGURE 30l"* 500'

.0' 250' 500' 75O'

miPICDS

TEJAMSLAB OO3

53j 1tsweeiiee 010 aug l 8 1982 - ontario53j 1tsweeiiee 010 received aug l 8 1982 mining lands...

Documents