507-d pre implementation report

26
507-D Pre Implementation Report March 24th, 2008 Water and Sanitation for Hope Integrated Academy Mulobere, Uganda University of Minnesota Chapter

Upload: alfonso-gomez

Post on 01-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

507-D Pre Implementation Report. Water and Sanitation for Hope Integrated Academy Mulobere, Uganda. March 24th, 2008. University of Minnesota Chapter. Introduction. Location – rural village 40 km south of Masaka, Uganda Community of 2000 where 19% of the children are orphans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

507-D Pre Implementation Report

March 24th, 2008

Water and Sanitation for Hope Integrated Academy Mulobere, Uganda

University of Minnesota Chapter

2

IntroductionIntroduction

Location – rural village 40 km south of Masaka, Uganda

Community of 2000 where 19% of the children are orphans

Partnership – Uganda Rural Fund All volunteer 501(c)3 non profit

started in 2005 to provide education and support for disadvantaged children, AIDs orphans, and marginalized communities throughout Uganda

The SchoolThe School

Uganda Rural Fund is building the Hope Integrated Academy

This school is designed to provide young people and adults with education and technical skills as a primary school, vocational school, community library, community center; and health clinic

Currently a after school program for 200 children

Future development will provide housing for 300 AIDS orphans and teach 200 children and adults from the community for a total of 500 students.

3

Current and Future LayoutCurrent and Future Layout

4

BuildingsCurrently On Property

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

The NeedThe Need

Nearby water sources are turbid contain bacteria and fluctuate with the season.

School must have a clean sustainable water source for both students and staff

School currently uses two pit latrines which are neither sustainable or hygienic

The school will need a more hygienic and sustainable sanitation system

5

The solutionThe solution

Rainwater harvesting to provide water for the after school students and staff

Ecological sanitation system with dry composting to provide a sustainable and hygenic solution

Assessment of possible deep well groundwater source with the expansion of the school

6

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

Why Rainwater System ?Why Rainwater System ?

Meeting with Government water agency during assessment revealed a 20% success rate for finding groundwater with know hydrogeology.

The active shallow well near the school dries up during the dry season

A deep well would be required costing $12,000 with less than 20% success rate

School is currently only in use for after school program Need a reliable water source Future expansion could include a well

7

Water StorageWater Storage

Capacity for next two years – 250 after school children Usage – 5 L/day

Size estimate

100,000 L

8

Storage TanksStorage Tanks

9

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota10

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

Gutter SystemGutter System

11

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

Gutter AttachmentsGutter Attachments

Attach fascia to roof structure. Attach gutters to fascia

13

Primary Water TreatmentPrimary Water Treatment Screens on gutters for large particle removal First Flush system at all down spouts for initial cleaning of

roof surface. Divert 7.6 L per 9.6 m2

Using 6’ PVC pipe = 1.75 m of pipe. During tests if floating system fails system without a plug

will be used

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

Secondary Water TreatmentSecondary Water Treatment

Common practice in Uganda is to boil all water

Other treatments include rapid sand filtration, slow sand filtration, SODIS, porous clay filter, UV, and chlorination

Possibilities Inline chlorination UV treatment

Still trying to locate chlorination tablets or UV bulbs in country

15

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

System overviewSystem overview

16

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

Sanitation

Ecological Dehydrating Toilets via urine-diversion

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

System Components

Elevated masonry structure Urine diverting toilets and urinals Solid waste temporary collection below toilets Solid waste long-term storage in rear Movable collection containers Solid waste dehydrating/reuse with addition of ash Vent pipes for air flow Septic tank/filter and leaching field Rainwater collection and hand washing station Composting education, hygiene education

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

System Design: Solid Waste

250 day students users, 15 live in teachers Density of feces: 1000kg/m3 (assumed fully saturated at all times)

Volume and Mass of Feces Produced

 Adult (kg, L)

Child = 2/3 x adult (kg,L)

Day Student = 2/3 x child

(kg,L)

250 Day Students + 15 Adults (Mg, m3)

daily 0.15* 0.10 0.067 0.02

weekly 1.1 0.70 0.47 0.13

monthly 4.5 3.0 2.0 0.57

yearly 55 37 24 6.9

Volume and Mass of Urine Produced

 Adult (kg, L)

Child = 2/3 x adult (kg,L)

Day Student = 2/3 x child

(kg,L)

250 Day Students + 15 Adults (Mg, m3)

daily 1.2* 0.80 0.53 0.15

weekly 8.4 5.6 3.7 1.1

monthly 36 24 16 4.5

yearly 440 290 200 55

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

System Design: Solid Waste HandlingSolid Waste Containers

Size of ContainerVolume of container

Number of containers required per year of

storage for waste and dry materials

Solid waste produced per day per toilet

Time to remove each container

[m3] [-] [m3] [days]

50 gallon jug 0.19 68 0.0033 32

.55 m x .55 m x 1 m 0.30 43 0.0033 51

.6 m x .6 m x 1 m 0.36 36 0.0033 61

.6 m x .6 m x 1.2 m 0.43 30 0.0033 73

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

System Design: Liquid Waste and Waste Application

Trench Sizing Calculations: 320 L = 85 gallons85 gal * 4.2 ft2 (0.39 m2) trench bottom/gal * 0.6 (depth reduction factor) = 215 ft2 = 20 m2

215 ft2 / 3 ft wide = 72 ft long = 24 m

Daily Volume of Wastewater (L)

Overestimate of urine (150 L * 1.3) 200

Maximum wash water 120

Total Wastewater 320

Waste Application

Type Yearly Production Total

Field Application Rate Area required

Urine 55 m3 1 L/m2/day 5.5 hectares

Solids 13,000 kg 8,000 – 60,000 kg/acre/year

0.4 hectares

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

System Design: Storage and Rain Collection

Storage Area Sizing 1. To the storage area required, add an extra 40% for maneuvering. 2. 43 containers * 0.3025 m2/container area = 13.0 m2

3. 13.0 m2 * 140% = 18.2 m2 needed for total storage area 4. There is room for 2 containers in each collection area allowing interior storage so 3.63 m2

inside total; thus, exterior storage area must be 18.2 m2 – 3.63 m2 =14.6 m2

5. For school growth and safety factor, use 2 times more = 14.6 m2 x 2 m2 = 29.2 m2

6. Resulting storage area (dimensions: 8 m wide x 4 m deep) = 32 m2 > 29.2 m2

(Note: Width includes roof over hand washing area) (Note: Controlling factor collection area size was space needed to use each toilet)

Rainwater Collection 1. Horizontal roof area = 44 m2

2. Seasonal collection volume = 0.5 m rain/season * 44 m2= 22 m3 volume possible 3. Tank size = 10,000 L (polytank or Ferro cement tank) = 10 m3 (and 10000 kg) 4. Water per person per day = 20 m3/year*1 year/365 days * 1 day/265 daily users = .21 L /day

per user 5. If have 20,000 L storage, allows 0.42 L/day per user

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

Sanitation System Reflection

Benefits•Prevents disease •Protects environment•Minimizes Odor •Maintainable and Convenient•Returns nutrients to Earth•250 Children, 15 Adults

•Potential Concerns - Solutions•Cultural acceptance of waste reuse – Education/Provision of benefits•Misuse of diversion toilet - Education/Provision of benefits•Undesirability of handling feces - Education/Provision of benefits•Supply of Ash – Children bring from home, school provides•Overuse of system – Removable containers allow flexibility in number of users•Post-dehydrating handling options – burying, burning, agricultural use

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

Rainwater BudgetRainwater Budget

24

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

Sanitation BudgetSanitation Budget

25

Engineers Without Borders – University of Minnesota

Total Budget and Future Total Budget and Future WorkWork

Total cost = 24,900

Assessment for future work Groundwater well

– Get hydrogeology of area complete Secondary treatment

– Locate possible UV light bulbs or chlorination tablets

26