5 why's-1 presentacion1engfinal

Upload: karthikkanda

Post on 03-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    1/19

    1

    What is 5-Whys

    Whenis used for?

    Howis used?

    Failure Modes

    Root cause

    Occurrence

    Detection

    Systemic Root cause

    Corrective Actions

    Examples

    Questions and Answers

    5 Whys Training

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    2/19

    2

    What is 5-Whys

    5-Whys is a tool used to determine the root cause(s) and

    corrective actions for any specific problem.

    An important idea behind the 5 Whys is to asked ourselves five

    times, Why it happened?

    The 5 whys is considered similar to a Problem Definition

    Tree used for Shainin, with the difference that the 5 whys

    also search for occurrence, detection and systematic root cause.

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    3/19

    3

    When is used 5-Whys

    5- Whyshas to be used whenever a5-phases report is generated

    to solve a problem. This is a Divisional Procedure

    requirements indicated on # 812 Procedure Corrective andPreventive Action.

    When we use a 5-Whys, we assumed that the root cause and

    corrective actions are unknown. It is important to know thefailure mode which requires to have the evidence (product)

    available to analyze it and confirmed the failure mode.

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    4/19

    4

    How is used 5-WhysFailure Mode:

    First, we have to know the failure mode, this is the mechanism of

    the failure, it means howitfailed.

    Examples:

    Problem:

    Customer could notassembly harness connector with our mating

    part at the Engine plant.

    Failure Mode:

    Mixed parts, specifically, part number 10456119 mixed in

    container of model 10456226.

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    5/19

    5

    Problem: Failure at M&D test.

    Failure Mode:

    Master Cylinder brake fluid leak between reservoir and

    machined body.

    Problem: Noise at RH front suspension.

    Failure Mode:

    Noisy damper

    Once we know failure mode of problem, we start with the

    5-Whys process.

    Customer problem description andsupplier failure mode

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    6/19

    6

    Root Cause:

    5-Whys system helps us identifying the root cause of a problem.

    This root cause is defined in three paths:

    Occurrence Root Cause: Physically what happened at ourmanufacturing flow that generate this failure mode.

    Detection Root Cause:What failed at our current detection system

    Operator instructions, SPC, final testers, poka-yokes,

    assessments, and reviewsto let the problem reachs our customer.Systemic Root Cause: What is weak in our Quality System, that

    requires improvement eg. TPM, PFMEA, lack of knowledge of

    Customer Interfaces, APQP, Build of Process/Design, etc.

    How is used 5-Whys

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    7/197

    5 Whys Format

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    8/198

    Root Cause Examples:- Occurrence:

    Worn tool due to inadequate preventive maintenance frequency

    Final Test Stand operator was not warned of model change.

    therefore, in the Fianl tester he mixed two part numbers in

    same box and then it were shipped.

    How is used 5-Whys

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    9/199

    5-Whys Root Cause of Occurrence

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    10/1910

    Root Cause Examples:- Detection:

    Final tester is not capable to review correct tool crimping. there is not any

    test at process which could detect it.

    Operator sorts mixed pieces, however this method is not effective, due

    similarity on pieces.

    Sample size taken by auditor was not big enough for mixed pieces detection.

    There are not Label layered audits to ensure correct delivery of labels.

    How is used 5-Whys

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    11/1911

    5-Whys Root Cause of Detection

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    12/1912

    Systemic-Root cause examples

    PFMEA did not consider this failure mode.

    Lack of knowledge of customer interfaces.

    Drawing does not consider it as critical characteristic

    (KPC)

    Preventive maintenance has not appropriate frequencies,Worn life tool was not evaluated.

    Model Changes procedure does not include inspection of

    first samples.

    How is used 5-Whys

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    13/1913

    5-Whys Root Cause Systematic

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    14/1914

    How is used

    Corrective Actions:

    After we found root cause of occurrence, detection and systemic ,

    we have to generate irreversible corrective actions.It is also important to turn off/on the problem in order to proceed

    with the corrective actions implementation.

    These corrective actions have to be written at right side of

    5 Whysprocess diagram.

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    15/1915

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    16/1916

    Improved 5 WhysAfter training provided

    P/N 001190 could

    not be assembled;

    Burr on the outside

    dia of the spindle

    Burrs on the outside

    dia of the spindle

    Worn stamping tool

    Tool exceeded

    recommended wear life

    PM interval did not

    take into account toollife or wear

    No procedure when

    creating PMs to

    determine tool life

    based on history or

    mfg recommendation

    Define Problem

    Parts passedinspection process

    Inspector did not

    follow the inspection

    procedure properly

    Inspector did not know to

    inspect for this criteria

    1. Not properly trained

    2. No standard inspprocedure/criteria

    1. No formal operator

    training system

    2. No standard insp

    procedure or visual

    aids/boundary samples

    Not robust PM on

    tool life

    No FTQ history

    available

    Inadequate tool validation

    Lack of PMProcedural

    Specific

    nonconformance

    being investigated

    Why the problem

    was not detected

    Systemic root cause

    WHY?

    WHY?

    WHY?

    WHY?

    WHY?

    WHY?

    WHY?

    WHY?

    WHY?

    WHY?

    WHY?

    A

    B

    C

    Corrective Actionwith responsibility

    Date

    1. Replace worn tool 3/20

    1. Train operator

    3/20

    WHY?

    4/1

    4/15

    1. Conduct PM on all dies

    after each run and

    maintain history (KJ).

    2. Develop strategic PM

    intervals and requirements

    on all dies based on

    history and mfg

    recommendations. (LB)3. Develop a company

    wide training program with

    clear requirements for

    trained or certified (ST)

    4. Review all inspection

    procedures and improve

    visual aids and criteria (LB)

    5. Begin tracking FTQ at

    stamping to monitor PM

    improvement (PP)

    6. Set up layered audits for

    training matrix (CB)

    7. Set up layered audits for

    PM completion (DG)

    8. Update PFMEA/PCP/TPM

    5/20

    4/21

    3/25

    4/1

    DO

    DO

    DO/ACT

    ACT

    ACT

    CHECK

    CHECK

    4/1

    ACT

    ACT

    5/1 CHECK

    CHECK

    DO/ACT

    Black = Suppliers initial response

    Blue = Updated 5Why thru QFS process

    Red = PDCA

    4/1

    3/20

    4/1 DO/ACT

    PLAN

    PLAN

    PLAN

    2. Add step in procedure

    for creating new PM to

    review manufacturers

    recommendation and

    history to determine

    PM interval (GT)

    2. Develop insp standards

    for all products (JM)

    3. Develop visual aids forinspection criteria for allproducts (DG)

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    17/1917

    5 Whys Example

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    18/1918

    5 Whys Example

  • 8/12/2019 5 Why's-1 Presentacion1engfinal

    19/1919

    5 Whys Example