8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

1/30

PROIECT

DEZVOLTAREA LUNCII DUNARII

FLOODPLA IN REDEVELOPMENT ,

Dol j County, Romania

Suan Tie Pwaproject manager

Joep de Roo

Final seminar December 5th 2011

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

2/30

procedure decision making

long preparation

interests and money

many stakeholders

clear process decision making

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

3/30

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

4/30

problem

exploration

plan

developmenttendering

implementation

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

5/30

spatial plansland owners; purchase and

expropriation

technical feasibiltycost estimatescost benefit analysisenvironmental impact assessmentsocio economic effects

tender documents

MMEDIU (MINISTER/ SECR/ DIR)

ANARMADRCounty councilsInter-ministerial Council for Waters

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

6/30

Benefits

systematic approach

programme & projectmanageble

during project : noarguments about process -focus upon the issues

steps and decisions areclear to everybodyinvolved

transparency betterchance EU fundapplication accepted

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

7/30

Scenario study

Demonstration application procedur

preparation of decision pointchoice of alternatives

Demonstration project approach

WFD National strategy on Flood risk

management

Floodplain Dolj county between

Ghidici and Zavalu

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

8/30

Scenario study objectives

consultation local stakeholders

integrated solutions

wide range of possibilities

Room for river concept

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

9/30

Issues / objectives

1. safety vrs floods

2. flood plains

3. renaturation

(WFD / river basinmanagement plan)

4. agriculture: increase activity

and production level

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

10/30

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

01/01/2006 05/03/2006 07/05/2006 09/07/2006 10/09/2006 12/11/2006

date

discharge[m

3/s]

Dike breach April 14

Drainage-breach on May 3

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

11/30

safety vrs floods (movie)

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

12/30

Scenario 1

Status quo maintained

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

13/30

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

14/30

Advantages:

simple intervention

agricultural area preserved and

better protected

Disadvantages:

no compliance with WFD and River

Basin Management Plan it does notserve one of the objectives

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

15/30

Scenario 2

Floodplain exposed to Danube regimedevelopment of Natura2000 habitats.

Construction of by-pass channelflood risk reduction by giving roomto Danube river

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

16/30

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

17/30

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

18/30

30.0

31.0

32.0

33.0

34.0

35.0

36.0

37.0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

distance along Danube [km]

m

ax.waterlevel[ref+m]

Reference no flood

Scenario 2a

Scenario 2b

Calafat Bechet

inflow flood

channel

Project area

Maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, without and withflood channels

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

19/30

-42.0

-36.0

-30.0

-24.0

-18.0

-12.0

-6.0

0.0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

distance along Danube [km]

differen

ceinmax.waterlevel[cm]

difference scen 2a

difference scen 2b

Calafat Bechet

inflow flood

channel

Project area

Difference in maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, due to the flood

channels

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

20/30

Advantages:

smaller flood risk up to Calafat

WFD / ABA Jiu River Basin Management Plan

most important agricultural area will be preservedNatura 2000 area demarcated and open for floods

opportunities for (eco) toursim and fishing

Disadvantages:

very large scale measures - expensive

loss of some agricultural land

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

21/30

Scenario 3

Renaturation of Floodplaindevelopment of Natura2000 habitats.

Floodplain participates in dischargeflood risk reduction by giving roomto Danube river

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

22/30

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

23/30

30.0

31.0

32.0

33.0

34.0

35.0

36.0

37.0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

distance along Danube [km]

ma

x.waterlevel[ref+m]

Reference no flood

Scenario 3

Calafat Bechet

Project area

Maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, without and withinundation of the floodplain

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

24/30

-42.0

-36.0

-30.0

-24.0

-18.0

-12.0

-6.0

0.0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

distance along Danube [km]

differe

nceinmax.water

level[cm]

difference scen 3

Calafat Bechet

Project area

Difference in maximum water level along the Danube for 2006, due toflooding of the floodplain

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

25/30

Advantages:

WFD / ABA Jiu River Basin Management Plan

Natura 2000 area extended and open for floodssmaller flood risk up to Calafat

Disadvantages:

major loss of agricultural land & farm income

major land purchase / expropriation

drainage of villages - technical issue

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

26/30

Preliminary evaluation scenarios

Scenario 1 2 3

Total cost 24 133 69

Excavated material market value (0) (++) (0)

EffectivenessFlood risk reduction (+) (++) (++)

Value of nature (-) (+) (++)

Side effects / consequencesLoss of agricultural production area (0) (-) (--)

Accelerated commercial crop production (++) (+) (0)

Fishing (0) (+) (+)Navigation (0) (0/-) (0)

(Eco) Tourism (0) (+) (++)

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

27/30

Public participation and

involvement local stakeholders

Set up

stakeholder analyses

workshop (including pre visit)

feedback session

Experiences

much interests in the process and

scenarios

workshop provided basis for scenarios appreciation consultation and feedback

local interest in renaturation and tourism;

more than safety floods and agriculture

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

28/30

Results & conclusions (1)

General

new concepts (in line with EU dir.) step ward approach in complicated issues

Procedure

procedure further acknowledgementRvR Netherlands

structure & outline solid basis for

elaboration

further discussion

R l & l i (2)

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

29/30

Results & conclusions (2)

Scenario study

demonstration of approach, public

participation and integrated solution

room for the river effective measure

elaboration River Basin Management Plan

frontrunner Natura 2000 Management Plan

impact agriculture and land owner ship

large scale measures

order of magnitude of costs

Wh t t?

8/13/2019 5 Dec 2011_vfinal

30/30

What next?