4.8 john fallons

38
It is time to invest in Permanent Supportive Housing for those Leaving Corrections John Fallon Program Manager- Re-Entry Corporation for Supportive Housing July 13, 2011 [email protected] www.csh.org

Upload: national-alliance-to-end-homelessness

Post on 15-May-2015

815 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 4.8 John Fallons

It is time to invest in Permanent Supportive

Housing for those Leaving Corrections

John FallonProgram Manager- Re-Entry

Corporation for Supportive HousingJuly 13, 2011

[email protected]

www.csh.org

Page 2: 4.8 John Fallons

CSH Impact: People and Communities

Page 3: 4.8 John Fallons

3

Corporation for Supportive Housing

CSH is a national non-profit organization that helps

communities create permanent housing with

services to prevent and end homelessness.

CSH advances its mission through advocacy,

expertise, innovation, lending, and grantmaking.

Page 4: 4.8 John Fallons

The Corporation for Supportive Housing’s

Returning Home Initiative

An initiative to integrate systems and end the cycle of incarceration

and homelessness.

Ending Homelessness and Unnecessary Institutionalization

Page 5: 4.8 John Fallons

People from corrections on the street are often a hidden problem. Housing and homeless providers often

underestimate the prevalence.

As part of the 100,000 person campaign, Chicago identified the most vulnerable people based on a

vulnerability scale to identify who was most at risk of dying on the street. Of the people identified, 70% had a history of

jail detention and 36% had a history of prison incarceration.

We do not prepare people. Systems do not work together.

We need a change

Central Premise of Returning Home

Page 6: 4.8 John Fallons

Thousands of people with chronic health conditions cycle in and out of incarceration and homelessness, and they

are ill-served by these crisis systems at great public expense and with limited positive human outcomes.

Placing these people in supportive housing will improve life outcomes for the tenants, more efficiently utilize public resources, and likely create cost avoidance in

crisis systems like corrections and shelter.

AND……….

Central Premise of Returning Home

Page 7: 4.8 John Fallons

Supportive housing plays a critical role in comprehensive re-entry and/or diversion efforts as a proven intervention for people being diverted from jail or exiting incarceration

with high needs and histories of homelessness.

Central Premise of Returning Home

Page 8: 4.8 John Fallons

1. According to a study of Denver’s Road Home Housing First effort, people placed into supportive housing had a 76% reduction in days spent incarcerated. Significant reductions were also reported in emergency room visits, detox, psychiatric care, and shelter use.

2. A study of supportive housing in the State of Maine found a 62% reduction in incarceration for people placed into supportive housing.

Supportive Housing Works

Page 9: 4.8 John Fallons

3. In Seattle, studies of supportive housing at 1811 Eastlake demonstrate:– 52% reduction in jail bookings– 45% reductions in days spent in jail

4. After six months of New York City’s supportive housing reentry program:– 89% of tenants remained stably housed.– 100% of tenants avoided return to shelter.– 89% of tenants avoided return to jail.

Supportive Housing Works

Page 10: 4.8 John Fallons

1. Data Matching and Analysis

2. Inter-agency Collaboration

3. Program Design with Broad Support & Participation

4. New Partnerships -Prison “In-reach” & Community Linkages

Re-entry Supportive Housing: Key Components

Page 11: 4.8 John Fallons

5. Investments from Array of Agencies (with philanthropic support)

6. Securing Supportive Housing

1. Development

2. Master Leasing

3. Set-asides

7. Development of Network of Supportive Housing Providers

Re-entry Supportive Housing: Key Components

Page 12: 4.8 John Fallons

3 Primary Sites

Chicago / IL, New York, LA / California

Work also in

Kansas, Indiana, Ohio, Minnesota, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Colorado, Washington DC, Oregon, Michigan, Texas, and Arizona

Returning Home Work is occurring in…

Page 13: 4.8 John Fallons

Reducing Recidivism = Reducing Crime

“Re-entry supportive housing is essentially a public safety initiative; serving to stabilize people in the community and reduce recidivism.”

- Gordon Bass, Director, Jacksonville,

FL Sheriff’s Office

Page 14: 4.8 John Fallons

14

Community Planning Grants

CSH Statewide Re-entry Planning Grant Recipients

including one outside the 10 target areas

City of Rockford Human Services Dept.AIDS Foundation of ChicagoDupage PADS, WheatonRita’s Ministry, North AuroraGrand Prairie Services, Tinley ParkCity of Peoria, Workforce Dev. Dept.Transitions Mental Health, Rock IslandDove, Inc., DecaturKankakee County Renewed OpportunityCrosspoint Human Services, Danville Mental Health Center of ChampaignLand of Lincoln Goodwill, SpringfieldChestnut Health Systems, Granite CityPrisoner & Family Ministry – LSSI – Marion

Page 15: 4.8 John Fallons

Targeted Services- Frequent UsersThree Pillars, Nine Steps

15

Page 16: 4.8 John Fallons

Re-entry: Why is CSH Involved?

The Intersection Between Homelessness & Incarceration– Lots of People

PSH works.

Page 17: 4.8 John Fallons

Of people exiting incarceration….

Three out of four have a substance abuse problem

More than 10 percent of those coming in and out of jail and prison are homeless in the months prior to incarceration.

An estimated 42% of inmates in state prisons and 49% in local jails were found to have both mental health and substance use issues.

More than one in three jail inmates report some physical or mental disability.

The Link Between Homelessness & Incarceration

Page 18: 4.8 John Fallons

What are the Barriers at Release?

No Identification, SSI, Birth Certificate No Medical Funding, Disability Determination No Psych Services- Services or Not Where Person Needs it No Health Care Services except expensive emergency rooms Parole or Probation Rules No Housing, No Affordable Housing No Income Prejudice Because of Record, MI, Substance Use, Homeless, Poor,

Race Family Relationships Damaged Hopelessness, Despair Release Planning Period, Parole- Technical Violations Lack of MISA Programming- Drug Testing

Page 19: 4.8 John Fallons

The Link Between Homelessness & Incarceration

A study of releasees from New York State Prison and New York City Jails and found that those who went to shelter were 7x more likely to violate parole as those who were discharged to family or housing.

A study in NYC documented the interrelationships between shelter use and re-incarceration. – 11% entered NYC homeless shelters, of this group, 33% returned to

prison within 2 years

– Survival analysis showed ‘time since release’ and ‘residential instability’ were the most salient risk factors for shelter use

– Shelter use increased the risk of recidivism.

Page 20: 4.8 John Fallons

Gladwell (2006) described “Million Dollar Murray” who cost roughly $1 million in public service utilization (jails, detox, emergency rooms)

The “Million Dollar Murray” Phenomenon

Richard is an actual case study from Chicago, Illinois 42 years old and we documented 21 years of homelessness,

incarceration, and hospitalization His entire adult life 3,758 days in a mental health/hospital setting during that time 399 days in jail (This includes only 6 years of available data)

The Cost of Richard Homelessness 3758 State Hospital Days @ $400 a day $1,503,200 399 Jail Days $70 a day $ 27,930 TOTAL $1,531,130 Average Annual Cost for Richard $ 72,910

Page 21: 4.8 John Fallons

What Is Permanent Supportive Housing?

It is a part of the solution for corrections.

Page 22: 4.8 John Fallons

What Is Supportive Housing?

A cost-effective combination of permanent, affordable housing with services that helps people live more stable, productive lives. Key Elements:

1.) Permanent housing2.) Affordable at 30% - 50% of income3.) Services are flexible tailored, and ideally voluntary. Often incorporate housing first and “low demand” strategies for placement4.) Available to single adults as well as families

Page 23: 4.8 John Fallons

23

HOUSING – PERMANENT: Not time limited, not

transitional;– AFFORDABLE: For people coming

out of homelessness; and– INDEPENDENT: Tenant holds lease

with normal rights and responsibilities. SERVICES

– FLEXIBLE: Designed to be responsive to tenants’ needs;

– VOLUNTARY: Participation is not a condition of tenancy; and

– INDEPENDENT: Focus of services is on maintaining housing stability.

Housing + Services

Page 24: 4.8 John Fallons

24

Supportive Housing is NOT:

Treatment

Licensed community care

Transitional – Transition to what? It is finding the person the housing

and the support they need.

Page 25: 4.8 John Fallons

25

People who: Are homeless Face persistent obstacles to maintaining housing, such

as mental health issues, substance use issues, other chronic medical issues, and other challenges.

Cycle through institutional and emergency systems and are at risk of long-term homelessness

Are being discharged from institutions and systems of care

Without housing, cannot access and make effective use of treatment and supportive services

Who is Supportive Housing For?

Page 26: 4.8 John Fallons

26

People who: BUT FOR HOUSING cannot access

and make effective use of treatment and supportive services in the community;

and

BUT FOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES cannot access and maintain stable housing in the community.

Who is Supportive Housing For?

Page 27: 4.8 John Fallons

27

Supportive Housing Types

Apartment buildings exclusively housing formerly homeless individuals and/or families.

Rent subsidized apartments leased in open market.

Apartment buildings with mixed income households, including the formerly homeless.

Long-term set aside of units within privately owned buildings.

Services integrated within existing affordable housing developments.

Single family homes, including shared housing environments.

Page 28: 4.8 John Fallons

28

A realistic approach that can be implemented through a variety of models.

Can be adapted to the unique needs and characteristics of communities.

Has proven its effectiveness--for better health and well-being--for individuals, families and the communities in which they live.

Has demonstrated cost effectiveness.

Why Supportive Housing?

Page 29: 4.8 John Fallons

29

Housing + Services Make a Difference More than 80% of supportive housing tenants are able to maintain

housing for at least 12 months Most supportive housing tenants engage in services, even when

participation is not a condition of tenancy Use of the most costly (and restrictive) services in homeless, health

care, and criminal justice systems declines Nearly any combination of housing + services is more effective than

services alone “Housing First” models with adequate support services can be

effective for people who don’t meet conventional criteria for “housing readiness”

Consistent Findings of Research

Page 30: 4.8 John Fallons

Adaptations for CJ Population

Low case manager-to-client ratio (1:10 – 1:15) Attention to community safety – court and CJ savvy Providers trained in Motivational Interviewing, navigating

criminal justice system, harm reduction, recognizing “symptoms” of incarceration

6 months of intensive outreach and persistence and ongoing long term view of services

Case manager role as “client advocate” and “failure preventer”

Emphasis on reduction of “risky behaviors” Non-judgmental, client-centered counseling Team approach to services delivery

30

Page 31: 4.8 John Fallons

What Does Reentry Supportive Housing

Look Like?

Page 32: 4.8 John Fallons

St. Andrews Court

Located in Chicago, Illinois 42 units of permanent supportive

housing New construction. Serves single male offenders who are

homeless. Partnered with Lakefront Supportive

Housing, an experienced supportive housing developer

Operated by St. Leonard’s Ministries Fannie Mae Maxwell Award Winning

Project Recidivism rates decrease from 50% to

20% for participants in their programs.

Page 33: 4.8 John Fallons

Rowan Trees- Chicago, IL

45 units: 6 one-bedroom units that are handicap accessible and 39 efficiency studios

Target- SMI Dual Diagnosis

Service Provider Thresholds

Page 34: 4.8 John Fallons

Sanctuary Place

63 SRO Units 6 3-bedroom

townhomes For women who

are formerly incarcerated and have a history of domestic abuse, substance abuse or mental illness

Page 35: 4.8 John Fallons

Thanks for your Interest and Attention to this subject.

You can make a difference by making your community– Safer in the long run– Saving money over repeated institutionalization– Improving lives– Doing the right thing

Page 36: 4.8 John Fallons

Useful Resources

National Institute for Corrections– ABT- Transition from Prison to Community

US Department of Justice GAINS Center- Technical Institute on Co-Occurring

MISA Disorders- Jails- 800-311-4246www.prainc.com, Hank Steadman

Corporation for Supportive Housing (www.csh.org) SAMHSA- 800-729-6686

– Best Approach to Re-Entry– Continuity of Offender Treatment

Bazelon Center for MH Law- 202-467-5730www.bazelon.org

Page 37: 4.8 John Fallons

Useful Resources

American Jail Association / American Correctional Association

Urban Institute- Policy and Profile Papers on Prison Re-entry Issues

Human Rights Watch- www.hrw.org Center for Mental Health and Criminal Justice

Research TAPA Center / National Alliance to End

Homelessness Criminal Justice / Mental Health Consensus Project-

www.consensusproject.org

Page 38: 4.8 John Fallons

For more information, contact:

John Fallon

Program Manager, Re-Entry

“Returning Home Initiative”

Corporation for Supportive Housing

203 N. Wabash, Suite 410

Chicago, IL  60601

T 312.332.6690 x21

C 773.719.4601

E [email protected]