4 nanoelectronics chap 1
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 4 nanoelectronics chap 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071706/55c143c7bb61ebc37c8b474f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
F.N.E.
S.C. JUN
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
C h a p t e r
1
![Page 2: 4 nanoelectronics chap 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071706/55c143c7bb61ebc37c8b474f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
F.N.E.
S.C. JUN
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
• The problem of shrinking the size of devices fabricated through optical
lithography can be readily understood.
• One can broadly define lithography as the process of
1 Lithography
![Page 3: 4 nanoelectronics chap 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071706/55c143c7bb61ebc37c8b474f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
F.N.E.
S.C. JUN
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
• Using electromagnetic energy to transfer a pattern from a mask to a resist layer
deposited on the surface of a substrate.
• 1. A photosensitive emulsion called a photoresist is applied to the wafer
• 2. Optical energy (light† ) is directed at a photomask containing opaque and
transparent regions that correspond to the desired pattern.
• (a) For a negative photoresist, the resist material is initially soluble(for a
particular solvent that will be used in development), and through a chemical
reaction when exposed to light, becomes insoluble.
• (b) In a positive photoresist, the resist material is initially insoluble, and
through a chemical reaction when exposed to light, becomes soluble.
Figure 1. Depiction of steps 1-3 of the
lithography process.
![Page 4: 4 nanoelectronics chap 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071706/55c143c7bb61ebc37c8b474f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
F.N.E.
S.C. JUN
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
• May then be performed to transfer the pattern from the resist to the wafer.
• (a) Etching may be used to remove substrate material.
• The photoresist serves to resist the etching and protect sections of the wafer
that it covers.
• After etching the resist is removed, leaving the desired structure.
• (b) Material may be deposited, for example, me0tallization, onto the wafer.
• Then the photoresist can be removed( the material deposited on the
photoresist is also thereby removed, which is known as lift-off)
• Leaving the deposited material in areas that were not covered by the resist.
• (c) Doping can occur.
• A beam of dopant ions can be accelerated towards the wafer.
• Thus creates regions of doping in areas not covered by the resist.
• This is known as ion implantation.
Figure 2 Depiction of light diffraction
through an aperture in an opaque screen.
![Page 5: 4 nanoelectronics chap 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071706/55c143c7bb61ebc37c8b474f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
F.N.E.
S.C. JUN
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
• The resolution R of an optical lithography process describes the ability of an
imaging system to resolve two closely spaced objects.
• And is not actually the smallest feature size of a printed object.
• The general problem of achieving good resolution can be appreciated by
considered the pattern of light.
• Forms in passing through the transparent regions of the photomask.
• By a process known as diffraction,
• Basically the ability of light to “bend” around corners, as light passes through an
aperture on the mask, it tends to smear out
• There is an interplay between the aperture size 2ω, wavelength λ, and position z.
• Although, in general, at a fixed position z the smaller the aperture compared to
wavelength.
• The resolution of an optical lithography process.
• k1 is a constant, λ is the wavelength of the source, and N A is called the
numerical aperture.
R = k1 NA
λ
![Page 6: 4 nanoelectronics chap 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071706/55c143c7bb61ebc37c8b474f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
F.N.E.
S.C. JUN
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
• In contrast to the “top-down” approach, this nano scale building is called the
“bottom-up” approach, and represent a much more radical technology shift,
which is currently being explored in research laboratories.
• The development of nanoscopic devices includes the possibility of ultrasmall,
low power electronic products, such as communication and computing devices
and embedded sensors.
• Furthermore, as electronics shrink, the possibility of further incorporating
electronics with biological systems rapidly expands.‡
• Therefore, there are many factors driving the miniaturization of electronic
devices.
1.2 THE “BOTTOM-UP” APPROACH
1.3 WHY NANOELECTRONICS?
![Page 7: 4 nanoelectronics chap 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071706/55c143c7bb61ebc37c8b474f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
F.N.E.
S.C. JUN
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
• Thus, the question “Why nanoelectronics?” seems to have an obvious answer.
• In addition to the benefits of smaller transistors, there are significant problems in
shrinking conventional devices to the nanoscale. For example,
•
• 1. Device fabrication: it may be difficult to extend optical lithography into the
realm of low tens of nanometers
• Other fabrication methods (such as the bottom-up approach) for high-
throughput, commercial-laver production are not
• 2. Device operation: As device dimensions are reduced, voltage levels also need to
be reduced accordingly.
• This lowers the threshold voltage of MOSFET devices, and makes it difficult
to completely turn the device off, wasting power.
• Tunneling and ballistic transport are two prominent quantum effects that will
be discussed.
![Page 8: 4 nanoelectronics chap 1](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071706/55c143c7bb61ebc37c8b474f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
F.N.E.
S.C. JUN
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
• 3. Heat dissipation: As device density increase, the dissipation of heat
becomes a major problem
• Reducing circuit reliability and leading to shorter device lifetimes, or to
device failure.
• If the rate of increasing device density were to continue, microprocessors
would soon be producing more heat per square centimeter than the
surface of the sun!§
• § Current ICs have power densities in the order of 100 W/cm2, up from
10 W/cm2 a decade ago.
• The power density of a typical hot plate is 10 W/cm2 , whereas the
surface of the sun has 7000 W/cm2 .