3g to 2g handover v1

15
3G to 2G Handover Presentation July 10, 2006

Upload: phenom1979

Post on 22-Nov-2014

481 views

Category:

Documents


10 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 3G to 2G Handover v1

3G to 2G Handover Presentation

July 10, 2006

Page 2: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 2

Current Setting

GSM

UMTS

IdleQsearch_I = AlwaysFDD Qmin = -13

DedicatedNot Allowed

IdleEcIoSsearchRAT = 4 (-14)

DedicatedRSCPthrown_3a = -100 dBmthrooth_3a = -100 dBmthruf_2dug = -97 dBmthruf_2f = -94 dBm

Page 3: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 3

Makati-Mandaluyong-Pioneer

Poor Coverage &No Dominant Server.

Need to improve coverage

In Dedicated Mode, UE fall below -100 dBm in 2 sample. Trigger point from 3G to 2G <

-100 dBm.

In Idle Mode, EcIo still better than -14 even in low RSCP.

Hence no 3G to 2G cell reselection

Page 4: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 4

Makati- Mandaluyong Bridge

No Handover from 3G to 2G. Served by Rockwell2Missing 3G to 2G neighbors

Page 5: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 5

Makati- Mandaluyong Bridge (DT Logs)

UE already verified BSIC and Trigger Event 3a, however no reply from network.Need to perform IMSI trace for troubleshooting. Suspect similar problem with BPI

Page 6: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 6

Buendia Avenue

Page 7: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 7

Flyover Bridge from The Fort to Edsa

Page 8: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 8

Burgos Street Makati

Page 9: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 9

Poor Inter-RAT Handover SR

From statistics, 100% PS inter-RAT handover failure rateBPI, SAMAT, CUPANG – chosen for troubleshootingSAMAT – KPI : InterRAT HOSR CS = 75%, PS = 0%

Page 10: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 10

Drive Test Result - SAMAT

From DT, PS Inter-RAT HO is successfulReply from TAC3 Munich -------- > Suspect Statistics Counter Problem

Page 11: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 11

BPI Buendia

100% inter-RAT HO Failure CSDrive Test and IMSI Trace was conducted for troubleshootingResults of Trace : Core Network sending RANAP relocation failure with cause value o&minterventionEscalated to Core for troubleshootingVery Poor 3G Coverage.

No Outdoor Sites, current serve by BPI indoor.

Outdoor 3G node B required.NO 3G to 2G handover

Page 12: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 12

BPI Buendia IMSI Trace

Page 13: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 13

Action Plan

CS Inter-RAT HO- Define additional 3G to 2G neighbors list ( Done-

pending database execution)- Perform K12 & IMSI trace for Rockwell &

Mckinley- Re-verify with Drive Test and Statistics - Coordinate with Core on the signaling issue (BPI

Buendia)PS Inter-RAT HO

- Iu (RNC-SGSN) and Iub signaling trace will be conducted this week

- Issue escalated to Siemens TAC3- From DT, the result is ok- Suspect KPI counter problem (TAC3)

Page 14: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 14

Propose New Setting

GSM

UMTS

IdleQsearch_I = AlwaysFDD Qmin = -13 -> -11

DedicatedNot Allowed

IdleEcIoSsearchRAT = 4 (-14) -> 6 (-12)

DedicatedRSCPthrown_3a = -100 dBm -> - 97throoth_3a = -100 dBm -> - 95thruf_2dug = -97 dBm -> -94thruf_2f = -94 dBm -> -90

Page 15: 3G to 2G Handover v1

Page 15

Pro & Con

PRO : - Faster Handover/Cell reselection from 3G to 2G- Reduce missing neighbors problem due to

overshoot serving of 3G- Better 3G KPI

CON : - 3G coverage shrink- Non Continuous 3G coverage