31-1 copyright 2010 mcgraw-hill australia pty ltd powerpoint slides to accompany biology: an...
TRANSCRIPT
31-1Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Part 5: Evolution and biodiversity
Chapter 31: Evolving life
31-2Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Phylogeny• Evolutionary relationships depicted in a branching
diagram– phylogenetic tree or cladogram
• Pattern of relationships uncovered using cladistic analysis– relationships between taxa identified by shared derived
characters
31-3Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Fig. 31.1: Phylogenetic tree
31-4Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Characters• Ancestral or primitive character
– plesiomorphic character or plesiomorphy
• Shared plesiomorphies– symplesiomorphies
• Example– platypus, koala, dingo
hair, internal fertilisation, suckle young
– these characters are symplesiomorphies do not show the pattern of relationships between the taxa
31-5Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Characters (cont.)• Derived or advanced character
– apomorphy
• Shared apomorphies– synapomorphies
• Example– koala and dingo
anal and urogenital openings separate, mammary glands with teats, egg shell absent
– these characters are synapomorphies indicate that koala and dingo are more closely related to
each other than either is to platypus
31-6Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Synapomorphies• Each branch of a cladogram is supported by one
or more synapomorphies• Each species has one or more unique characters
that distinguish it from other species– autapomorphy– contains no information about relationships
31-7Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Types of characters• Range of character types used in exploring
evolutionary relationships• Morphology
– anatomy– embryology
• Molecules– proteins (amino acid sequences)– DNA and RNA (nucleotide sequences)
Question 1:
What kinds of evidence would be required to support the theory that life evolved from a common ancestor?
a) DNA evidence
b) Morphological evidence
c) Fossil evidence
d) Embryological evidence
e) All of the above
31-8Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
31-9Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Comparing morphology• Anatomy
– comparison of body form example: pentadactyl (five-digit) limb of vertebrates
• Embryology– comparison of developmental patterns
example: protostome vs. deuterostome
– comparison of embryonic form example: notochord in chordates
Fig 31.2: The embryos of vertebrates
31-10Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
31-11Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Comparing morphology (cont.)• Vestigial organs
– rudimentary (poorly-developed) organs without functions
• Evolutionary remnants of structures that were functional in ancestral species– indicate phylogeny
• Example– pythons possess cloacal spurs
vestigial hind limbs
– descended from limbed ancestors
Fig 31.3: Vestigial structures
31-12Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
31-13Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Comparing morphology (cont.)• Fossils
– preserved remains of organisms
• Comparative morphology + geological time– indicate minimum age of taxa
• Reduced range of characters because of fossilisation process– usually bones, teeth, shells, wood
31-14Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Characters and information• All characters are not equally useful in
reconstructing phylogeny• Need to distinguish between
– characters that carry information– characters that carry no information
31-15Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Divergent evolution• Pattern of evolution is divergence from a common
ancestral form– example: crocodile, bird, bat and whale differ but are all
descended from a common ancestral form
• Change in form – example: crocodile, bird, bat and whale forelimbs differ in
external appearance but have same basic structure pentadactyl limb
• Homologous characters– same plan, different function– indicate common ancestry
31-16Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Fig. 31.4: Forelimbs of vertebrates
31-17Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Convergent evolution• Convergence in form in unrelated organisms
– example: cacti, euphorbs, aloes and other succulent plants are similar in form but are descended from different ancestral forms
• Similarity due to similar environments– example: succulent plants inhabit arid areas
• Analogous characters– different plan, same function– do not indicate common ancestry
31-18Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Fig. 31.5: Convergence in succulent plants
(a) cacti
(b) euphorbs
(c) Aloe
Copyright © Dennis Stevenson, New York Botanic Garden
Copyright © Professor Pauline Ladiges, University of Melbourne Copyright © Professor Pauline Ladiges, University of Melbourne
31-19Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Reconstructing phylogenies• Homologous characters
– provide information for examining phylogeny
• Analogous characters– do not provide information for examining phylogeny
31-20Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Parallel evolution• Closely related organisms may evolve similar
features because they face similar environments– features are analogous not homologous– parallel evolution
• Emphasises need to examine more than one set of characters
31-21Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Comparing molecules• Proteins
– comparison of amino acid sequences example: chimpanzees and humans have identical
sequences in several important proteins
• DNA– comparison of nucleotide sequences
example: phylogeny of apes reconstructed using mitochondrial DNA
Table 31.1: Comparing DNA sequences
31-22Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
31-23Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
DNA and RNA sequences• Rates of change differ between sequences• Nuclear-encoded RNA
– ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes– highly conserved (slow to change)– used to reconstruct phylogenies back to the origin of life
• Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), chloroplast DNA (cpDNA)– variable rates of change– can be used for more closely related taxa
Question 2:
Why do some parts of DNA accumulate mutations and evolve rapidly, while other parts are conserved and evolve more slowly?
31-24Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
31-25Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Fig. 31.8: Phylogeny of great apes and humans
31-26Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Classification• Grouping organisms with common characters• Classification reflects phylogeny
– grouped according to pattern of common ancestry
• Classification is dynamic– changes as more information about relationships
becomes available
Fig. 31.10: A phylogenetic tree
31-27Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
31-28Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Taxonomy• Methods and principles of classification• Rules for naming organisms
– written codes for consistency– international codes of nomenclature
• Taxon = group of organisms, level (rank) of classification– kingdom (highest level, most inclusive)– species (lowest level, least inclusive)
31-29Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Taxonomic hierarchy
kingdom
phylum
class
order
family
genus
species
intermediate ranks indicated by prefix sub- (e.g. subphylum, subfamily, subspecies)
31-30Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Monophyly• Hierarchical classification reflects phylogeny
– expresses the branching pattern of cladograms
• Each named group should be monophyletic– containing all descendants of a common ancestor– non-monophyletic groups: paraphyly, polyphyly
• Traditional classifications often include non-monophyletic groups– changing as we uncover more data about morphological
and molecular characters
31-31Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Paraphyly• Paraphyletic group
– does not include all descendants of a common ancestor– example: paraphyletic family Pongidae (great apes) does
not include humans (family Hominidae) although apes and humans form a monophyletic group
• Polyphyletic group– includes descendants from unrelated groups– based on convergent evolution– example: kingdom Protista is composed of many
unrelated lineages
31-32Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Fig 31.13: Monophyletic, paraphyletic and polyphyletic taxons
31-33Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
The binomial system• Codes of nomenclature set rules for naming ranks
of taxa– example: animal families end in -idae, plant families end
in -aceae
• All taxa except species have a single-word name– example: Chordata (phylum), Mammalia (class), Felidae
(family)
• Only species are identified by two words– genus + specific epithet– this is also called the binomial system
31-34Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Species names• Species names are composed of two parts
– genus name (capitalised)– specific epithet (never capitalised)
• Combination of genus + specific epithet are unique for each species– Tachyglossus aculeatus (echidna)– Aquila audax (wedge-tailed eagle)– Litoria nasuta (rocket frog)
31-35Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Species names (cont.)• May be more than one species in a genus
– Aquila audax (wedge-tailed eagle)– Aquila chrysaetos (golden eagle)– Aquila heliaca (imperial eagle)
• Specific epithet may be used in several genera– Litoria nasuta (rocket frog)– Perameles nasuta (long-nosed bandicoot)– Acropora nasuta (staghorn coral)
31-36Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
What is a species?• Basic unit of taxonomy• Different concepts of how the species taxon is
defined– biological species concept
based on reproductive isolation between species
– morphological species concept based on phenotypic difference between species
– many other concepts based on different aspects
31-37Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Kingdoms of life• Highest (most inclusive) rank of classification• Linnaeus classified all organisms into two
kingdoms– plants and animals
• Today six major lineages are recognised– Bacteria, Archaea, Protista, Plantae, Fungi and Animalia
• Changing classification
31-38Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University
Fig. 31.16: Schemes of classification
Bacteria: copyright © Kwangshin Kim/Photo Researchers, Inc.; Archaea: copyright © James King-Holmes/Science Photo Library/Photo Researchers, Inc.; Protista: copyright © Professor Geoff McFadden, University of Melbourne; Plantae: copyright © K Thiele, University of Melbourne; Fungi: copyright © H Swart; Animalia: copyright © Martin Harvey/ANT Photo Library
Summary• Phylogeny is the evolutionary history and
relationships of organisms• Phylogeny is discovered using homologous
features and cladistic analysis• DNA and amino acid sequencing contribute to
discovering phylogeny• Taxonomy is based on phylogenetic relationships• Major groups of life are classified in kingdoms
31-39Copyright 2010 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PowerPoint slides to accompany Biology: An Australian focus 4e by Knox, Ladiges, Evans and SaintSlides prepared by Karen Burke da Silva, Flinders University