3 3 4 electromagnetic simulation of cavity filters

Upload: olalere-kolawole

Post on 04-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    1/24

    Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity

    Filters and Dielectric Resonators

    Mark Bedford [email protected]

    Part Time Lecturer in Engineering, School of Engineering, Design & Technology / Visiting Researcher, Mobile and SatelliteComm unications Research Centre / University of Bradford.

    Presentation notes for the 4 th CST European User Group Meeting,Darmstadt, March 17th 2009.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    2/24

    Overview.

    Rsum of BTS Filter Technology. Complementary rle for electromagnetic analysis in

    filter synthesis/optimisation

    Rationale for compact triple mode.

    Development of basic filter response. Broadband analysis/Model Order Reduction (MOR).

    Eigenmode searches.

    Performance analysis and tuning.

    Realisation. Discussion and Conclusions.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    3/24

    Requirements for EM-analysis.

    Require:

    Fast and efficient

    calculations.

    Equally valid in timeand frequency domain.

    Properly represent the

    topology and geometry

    of Maxwellsequations.

    CST:

    Inbuild AR filtering in

    TD, MOR.

    Leap-frog algorithm,dual grid.

    Finite integration

    technique (FIT)and

    perfect boundaryapproximation (PBA).

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    4/24

    BTS Filter Technology.

    Standard filter technology is multi-conductor coaxial (combline), withsome contribution from ceramics.

    Next generation BTS filtering for advanced 3G and early 4Gsystems demand volume and weight reductions.

    Need to produce filter technologies which are:

    Smaller and lower cost. Similar or betterQ than combline.

    SuperiorQu/Vol.

    Single vs. multimode technologies.

    Expect several new technologies to become available: Single Mode.

    Dual Mode. Triple Mode.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    5/24

    Cavity Filter Technologies.

    1. Multi-conductor coaxial / combline.

    2. Dielectric combline.

    3. Dual mode ceramic (metallised).

    1

    2

    3

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    6/24

    S-Plane Synthesis.

    Generalised Chebyshev approximation

    Symmetrical network analysis Form the transmission coefficient, S21, in terms of even- and odd-mode

    admittances For a stable system, LHP poles of S21 are extracted using the alternating-

    pole technique

    Form even- and odd-mode admittances, Ye and Yo , from the polynomialcomprising the LHP poles

    Form ABCD matrix from Ye and Yo Extract the circuit element from the ABCD matrix

    Finite frequency transmission zero is extracted in the form of a phaseshifter, a shunt inductor in series with frequency invariant reactance

    followed by another phase shifter Transform the synthesized network into a cross-coupled network

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    7/24

    Coupling Paths and Alignment.

    Store reflected

    phase across

    passband and into

    stopband.

    Tune coupling andresonant

    frequency of each

    resonator to

    approximate error

    over stored band. Finite

    Transmission

    Zeros.RX path, 8

    resonators,

    3 cross

    couplings

    TX path, 7

    resonators,

    2 crosscouplings

    M12

    M23

    M13

    M34

    M45M56

    M67

    M78 M68

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    8/24

    Dielectric Resonators.

    Standard definition: an unmetallized piece of dielectric which functions as a resonant

    cavity by means of reflections at the air-dielectric interface.

    High permittivity, low loss microwave ceramic materials.

    Single mode technologies: Compact TE01 Ceramic combline.

    Ceramic waveguide.

    Dual and triple mode technologies: Dual mode: HE

    11 Dual and triple mode: TE01 Triple mode: TE01 & HE11

    Metallization.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    9/24

    The Spherical TE01 Resonator

    First spur is TM10 Introduce central hole

    Open to 30% of sphere diameter

    Upwards frequency shift bounded below1%, with maximum SPFF of 1.42. Implies21% increase in spur free BW cf solid DR.

    Hollow spheres, not mechanically sound. Circulation ofE with orthogonally varying

    H of TE01 v.similar to cubic structure.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    10/24

    Triple Mode DR Dielectric Sphere.

    JDMJDMAKS

    1.41071.34811.34101.366SPFF

    2.59652.47112.47112.52561st spur

    1.84141.83391.8337

    1.84011.83271.8327

    1.84011.83261.83261.8485Triplet

    Meshing 40 lines /

    No -refinement in initial conditions

    Calc.Mode

    Hollow,

    di/do=0.3

    Sphere, ro=12.4mm, r=45, 60mm

    cube

    JDMJDMAKS

    1.41071.34811.34101.366SPFF

    2.59652.47112.47112.52561st spur

    1.84141.83391.8337

    1.84011.83271.8327

    1.84011.83261.83261.8485Triplet

    Meshing 40 lines /

    No -refinement in initial conditions

    Calc.Mode

    Hollow,

    di/do=0.3

    Sphere, ro=12.4mm, r=45, 60mm

    cube

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    11/24

    The TE01 Resonator

    TE01 , HEM11 , HEM21 ,TM01 depends ondimensions and .

    When 1, the HEM11dominates as the lowestorder resonance.

    The indicates less thanhalf a sine wave variationalong the direction ofpropagation.

    For 35 approx. 95% ofthe stored electricalenergy of the TE01 -mode is confined withinthe resonator. The

    corresponding figure forthe magnetic energy is60%.

    The remaining EM energyis distributed through the

    air in the neighbourhoodof the dielectric surface,and rapidly decays withdistance.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    12/24

    The TE01 Resonator

    Optimisation of , 0.4.

    Introduction of central holeperturbs E, shifts resonanceand spurs having similar E-variation to higher frequencies.

    In fact any mode having its E-field concentrated near theaxial line will be affected.

    The central hole can beopened up to 35% withoutsignificantly affecting thefrequency.

    Effect of supporting structure. Typically alumina, 9.5 9.9.

    Polystyrene, 2.2.

    Support has non trivial effecton TM can become first spur.

    The downward frequency shiftis due to its E field lyingalmost entirely on the outsideflat surface of the dielectric.

    Sensitive to metal tuningdiscs.

    Possible strong coupling to

    inter-cavity irises. Multi-criteria optimisation, but

    constrained by synthesisrequirement.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    13/24

    Compact TE01 .

    Application: Full band filter.

    HighQu.

    Advantages:

    Better SPFF than HE11dual.

    Small cavity and singlemode flexible layout.

    Disadvantage:

    LowQu/Vol=310cm-3

    . Minimum cavity size is

    Diam 35 mm x 25 mmdeep height is a limitingfactor for someapplications.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    14/24

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    15/24

    Chamfered Rectangular DR.

    Mode 1: TE01 , e-field

    Mode 2: HE11 , h-field.

    Mode 3: HE11 , e-field

    Mode 1: TE01Mode 2: HE11Mode 3: HE11

    dualtriple

    Chamfer 6mm, cavity width 35.3mm

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    16/24

    Field Distributions, Calculated Qu-factor.

    Electric and magnetic field monitors at 2GHz (XY-plane):

    Losses and unloaded Q-factor.

    e-field h-field

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    17/24

    Coupling Mechanism.

    The excitation probes are aligned along the dual modes(HE11 ) the M12 and M23 couplings controlled as afunction of the coupling hole diameters (to and from thecircularTE01 mode).

    Dual mode coupling M13

    is controlled in practice byhaving tuning screws above the DR.

    M12

    1

    3M23

    h-field, 2GHz

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    18/24

    Basic Filter

    Response, N = 3.

    1.9 2.32 2.05 2.1 2.15 2.2 GHz

    -60

    0

    -55

    -50

    -45

    -40

    -35

    -30

    -25

    -20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    dB

    S21

    -50

    0

    -45.83

    -41.67

    -37.5

    -33.33

    -29.17

    -25

    -20.83

    -16.67

    -12.5

    -8.333

    -4.167

    dB

    S11

    umts : Graph : S21 Mag dB / S11 Mag dB

    1

    1.9 2.31.96 2 2.04 2.09 2.14 2.19 2.24 GHz

    -60

    0

    -55

    -50

    -45

    -40

    -35

    -30

    -25

    -20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    dB

    S21

    -50

    0

    -45.83

    -41.67

    -37.5

    -33.33

    -29.17

    -25

    -20.83

    -16.67

    -12.5

    -8.333

    -4.167

    dB

    S11

    pcs_at_2 : Graph : S21 Mag dB / S11 Mag dB

    1

    UMTS

    PCSCT-section

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    19/24

    Tuned Output of EM-analysis.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    20/24

    Final Comparison, N = 3.

    CH1 S22 LOG 5 dB/ REF 0 dB

    Cor

    PRm

    CH2 S21 LOG 5 dB/ REF 0 dB

    CENTER 2 000 .000 000 MHz SPAN 500 .000 000 MHz

    Cor

    PRm

    15 Jul 2002 14:44:53

    1

    2

    1:-19 .175 dB 1 937 .000 000 MHz

    CH1 Markers2:-18 .359 dB2.00900 GHz1 2

    3

    4

    5

    5:-.16020 dB 1 975 .700 000 MHz

    CH2 Markers1:-.16210 dB1.93700 GHz

    2:-.24330 dB2.00900 GHz

    3:-48 .886 dB2.05710 GHz

    4:-8 .3259 dB1.83700 GHz

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    21/24

    Next Step: N = 6.

    Internal Couplingsapproximately correct.

    Input/output probes to beincreased.

    EM-geometry of probesto be optimised.

    Current Unloaded Qvalue 7000 9000.

    CH1 S11 LOG 5 dB/ REF 0dB

    START 1 894 .836 004 MHz STOP 2 144 .836 004 MHz

    Cor

    PRm

    CH2 S21 LOG 10 dB/ REF 0 dB

    Cor

    PRm

    1 ep 2 2 1 : 1:1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    4:.25370 dB 2 070 .000 000 MHz

    CH1 Markers1:-9 .2733 dB1.97500 GHz

    2:-16 .391 dB2.01161 GHz

    3:-19 .698 dB2.05000 GHz

    1 2 3

    4

    4:-53 .609 dB

    CH2 Markers1:-.83090 dB1.97500 GHz

    2:-.14520 dB2.01161 GHz

    3:-.55090 dB2.05000 GHz

    CH1 S11 LOG 5 dB/ REF 0 dB

    START 1 894 .836 004 MHz STOP 3 000 .000 000 MHz

    PRm

    CH2 S21 LOG 10 dB/ REF 0 dB

    PRm

    MARKER 52.66746807 GHz

    1 ep 2 2 1 : 1: 5

    1

    23

    4

    5

    5:-1 .7323 dB 2 667 .468 070 MHz

    CH1 Markers1:-12 .762 dB

    1.97500 GHz2:-17 .136 dB

    2.01161 GHz3:-16 .030 dB

    2.05000 GHz

    4:-1 .5829 dB2.07000 GHz

    1 2 3

    4

    5

    5:-35 .030 dB

    CH2 Markers1:-2 .2911 dB

    1.97500 GHz2:-1 .7381 dB

    2.01161 GHz

    3:-3 .0676 dB2.05000 GHz

    4:-56 .046 dB2.07000 GHz

    Broadband

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    22/24

    Eventual Goal.

    Diplexer unit.

    N = 6 RX and TX.

    Phased common junction,

    physically using a simpletrough line construction.

    Integrated with LNA

    package.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    23/24

    Discussion.

    Proof of principle is apparent for compact triple mode,but not yet sufficient for useful application.

    Practical implementation not clear, notably with respectto suspension of DR and also degree of external tuning.

    Full identification of coupling mechanism, redundancy,proper linkage to network model. Experiment with use ofiris apertures. Space filling layout ?

    Dual mode operation may be more sensible interim goal.

    Eventual mixed dual and triple mode operation ?

    Selective use of partial metal deposition directly toceramic.

  • 7/31/2019 3 3 4 Electromagnetic Simulation of Cavity Filters

    24/24

    References.[1] Liang and Blair, High Q TE01 mode DR filters for PCS base stations, IEEE Trans. MTT-46, 12, 2493,

    1998.

    [2] Fiedziuszko et al, Dielectric materials, devices and circuits, IEEE Trans. MTT-50, 3, 706, 2002.[3] I.C.Hunter et al, Dual mode filters with conductor loaded dielectric resonators, IEEE Trans. MTT-47, 12,

    2304, 1999.[4] I.C.Hunter et al, Triple mode hybrid reflection filters, IEE Proc. MAP-145, 4, 337. 1998.

    [5] V.Walker and I.C.Hunter, Design of cross coupled dielectric loaded waveguide filters, IEE Proc. MAP-148,2, 91, 2001.[6] P.J.B.Clarricoats, Propagation along unbounded and bounded dielectric rods part 2, Proc. IEE 108C,

    177, 1961.[7] J.D.Rhodes, General constraints on propagation characteristics of electromagnetic waves in uniform

    inhomogeneous waveguides, Proc. IEE, 118, 7, 849, 1971.[8] T.Weiland, Eine methode zur losung der Maxwellschen Gleichungen fur sechs -komonentige Felder aufdiskreter Basis, AEU, 31, 116, 1977.

    [9] G.Deschamps, Differential Forms, in E.C.Roubine (ed), Mathematics applied to physics, SpringerVerlag/UNESCO.

    [10] T.Weiland, Finite integration and discrete electromagnetism, in C.Carstensen et al (eds), Lecture notes in

    comp. sci. and eng. Vol. 28, Springer Verlag.[11] I.Munteanu and F.Hirtenfelder, Convergence of the FIT on various mesh types, Proc. German Microwave

    Conference (GeMic05), Ulm, April 2005.[12] P.D.Sleigh, Asymmetric filter design for satellite communication applications, IEE colloquium on

    microwave filters, IEE colloquium digest 1982/4, 1982 (6 pages).[13] R.J.Cameron, Advanced coupling matrix synthesis for microwave filters, IEEE Trans. MTT-51, 1, 1, 2003.[14] A.G.Lamperez, et al, Effective electromagnetic optimization of microwave filters and multiplexers using

    rational models, IEEE Trans. MTT-52, 2, 508, 2004.