26/29 june - dipartimento di scienze giuridiche unisalento room r 27 judicial training and research...
TRANSCRIPT
26/29 June - Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche UniSalento Room R 27
Judicial Training and research on EU crimes against environment and maritime
pollution
Saverio Di Benedetto – University of Salento
International Environmental Protection and the Law of the Sea
International Environmental Protection and the Law of the Sea
I. Introduction – Legal, social and epistemic assumptions
II. International Legal Framework
III.Environmental principles
I - Introduction – Legal, social and epistemic assumptions
Legal Assumptions
Environmental protection is typically regulated by interna-tional law when global commons are involved, such as high seas or outer space, or global concerns are at stake, e.g. biodiversity or climate change.
Basic differences between national and international law
Absence of an established and unitary law-making process
Importance of customs and principles of law
Limited mechanisms of law enforcement
I - Introduction – Legal, social and epistemic assumptions
Social assumptions
Two main kinds of environmental interests
Human environment human health economic resources
Nature biodiversity habitats ecosystems
Two main forms of threats to the environment
Pollution
Natural resources exploitation / degradation
I - Introduction – Legal, social and epistemic assumptions
Marine environmental damage (pollution and degradation)
Pollution forms Ships navigation Toxic substances transportation Dumping Land-based activities (factories; urban agglomerates; agriculture) Mineral extraction from seabed Submarine cables and pipelines Atmospherics activities
Degradation causes Fisheries exploitation Whaling Modification of coastal territory
Threatened goods Marine biodiversity Fish and mammals stocks Coastal ecosystems and human habitats
Legal instruments are both general and focused on specific goods or threats
I - Introduction – Legal, social and epistemic assumptions
Epistemic assumptions
Industrialist paradigm vs. environmental discourses
3 models of environmental protection
Assimilative (polluter pays principle)
Preventive (prevention principle)
Precautionary (principle of precaution) The role of the science and inherent limits to knowledge and prediction
II – International Legal Framework
Customary law
International treaties and conventions
Legal principles
Soft law
II – International Legal Framework
Parallelism: Development of International Environmental Law and Instruments protecting marine environment
Stockholm Conference of 1972 on Human Environment. London Dumping Convention 1972 Maritime Pollution (MarPol) Convention 1973/78
UNCLOS 1982 : basic rules concerning marine environmental protection
Regional Seas Agreements
II - International Legal Framework
UNCLOS - PART XII PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT
Art. 192 – General obligation “States have the obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment.”
Art. 193 – Sovereign right of States to exploit their natural resources “States have the sovereign right to exploit their natural resources pursuant to their environmental policies and in accordance with their duty to protect and preserve the marine environment”
II - International Legal Framework
Art. 194 – Measures to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment
1) “States shall take, individually or jointly as appropriate, all measures consistent with this Convention that are necessary to prevent, reduce and control pollution of the marine environment from any source […]”
2) “States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that activities under their jurisdiction or control are so conducted as not to cause damage by pollution to other States and their environment, and that pollution arising from incidents or activities under their jurisdiction or control does not spread beyond the areas where they exercise sovereign rights”
II - International Legal Framework
3) Far-reaching list of relevant sources of marine pollution
4) “In taking measures to prevent, reduce or control pollution of the marine environment, States shall refrain from unjustifiable interference with activities carried out by other States in the exercise of their rights and in pursuance of their duties in conformity with this Convention.”
5) “The measures taken in accordance with this Part shall include those necessary to protect and preserve rare or fragile ecosystems as well as the habitat of depleted, threatened or endangered species and other forms of marine life.”
Artt. 207 – 212 Specific obligations for states to prevent reduce and control pollution of marine environment
II - International Legal Framework
III – Environmental Legal Principles
Key role of the UN Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June 1992)
Final Declaration: set of non-binding principles
Principle 16 (polluter pays principle) “National authorities should endeavour to promote the internalization of environmental costs and the use of economic instruments, taking into account the approach that the polluter should, in principle, bear the cost of pollution, with due regard to the public interest and without distorting international trade and investment.”
III – Environmental Legal Principles
Principle 2 “States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their own resources pursuant to their own environmental and developmental policies, and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.”
Quasi-identical text of Principle 21 of Stockolm Declaration (nature of customary rule)
Internal antagonism between first and second part
Parallel between Principle 2 and art. 192-194 UNCLOS
III – Environmental Legal Principles
Principle 15 (the precautionary principle) “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.”
This principle is affirmed since mid ‘80s. It was not set out by the UNCLOS and other conventions protecting the marine environment, but has been subsequently integrated in all relevant conventions, by amendments and protocols.