24 degrees - confort productivity and energy consuption
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
1/32
24CStudy:Comfort, Productivityand Energy ConsumptionPublished by the British Council for Offices, January 2008Research conducted by Arup
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
2/32
2
24C Study: Comfort, Productivity and Energy Consumption
Contents
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
3/32
3
Foreword. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Executive summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1 INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2 COMFORT AND PRODUCTIVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2 Existing guidance and standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.3 Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3 ENERGY CONSUMPTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.2 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
5 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Contents
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
4/32
4
24C Study: Comfort, Productivity and Energy Consumption
ABOUT THE BRITISH COUNCIL FOR OFFICES
Established in 1990, the British Council for Offices mission is to research, develop and communicate best practice in
all aspects of the office sector. It delivers this by providing a forum for the discussion and debate of relevant issues
and works to promote co-operation and understanding between landlord and tenant, investor and developer, and owner
and occupier therefore encouraging efficiency and innovation in the office sector. The BCO has over 1,200 members,
who are organisations and individuals involved in creating, acquiring or occupying office space, both private and public
sector. The diverse nature of the BCO membership puts it in a unique position to advance the collective understanding
of its members, and the industry more generally, facilitating the creation of more effective office space.
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
5/32
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
6/32
6
24C Study: Comfort, Productivity and Energy Consumption
Currently the British Council for Offices recommends that thetemperature within an air-conditioned office should be
controlled to 22C and that the space should have an
acceptable level of humidity; that is, the relative humidity
should be within the range 40-60%. It is now widely
accepted that there is a need to reduce carbon emissions to
both reduce the rate of climate change and, equally
important, our dependence upon fossil fuels. Buildings are
responsible for a significant component of the United
Kingdoms carbon emissions and so any reduction will be a
useful contribution to the achievement of Government
targets in this area. One way to do this is to increase the
internal temperature in offices when cooling is used. The
British Council for Offices would like to increase the setpoint
by 2C, but have some concerns as to the effect on both
occupant comfort and productivity. They therefore
commissioned Arup to carry out a review of existing research
in these areas and also to assess the likely impact on energy
consumption The results of the study are summarised here.
COMFORT
The study was solely concerned with thermal comfort that
is the feeling of being hot or cold. Other aspects such as
noise and glare are unlikely to be affected by the change in
internal temperature. Furthermore, the study focussed on air-conditioned buildings rather than free-running buildings.
While the change of 2C might appear small, in practice
because of the way the space temperature controls function,
maximum space temperatures of 2C above the set value may
occur (and indeed are permitted in the BCO specification).
This means that 26C could occur during hot weather. Due to
sensors being mainly unable to measure operative
temperature, it is difficult to prescribe setpoint temperatures
based on operative temperatures alone, but it is suggested
that the air temperature setpoints are such that the
operative comfort range is ensured.
Researchers in the area of thermal comfort fall into twocamps; these are usually referred to as the Fanger approach
and the adaptive approach. The late P.O. Fanger carried out a
large number of comfort studies on people in controlled
environments from which he was able to develop a comfortequation relating the sensation of comfort (technically a
balance between heat generated and heat lost from the
body) to the following parameters:
Air temperature.
Temperature of the surroundings.
Air speed.
Humidity.
Type of clothing.
Type of activity.
This method is the basis for the current British and
International comfort standard.
The adaptive approach is based on surveys and looks at how
people respond in general. The most important result from
this work is that people will accept higher temperatures
inside buildings if, for example:
They can adjust the way they dress take jackets off
remove ties.
Alter air movement by desk fans for example.
Have control of blinds.
The external temperature has been high for a number of days.
Current guidance from the Chartered Institution of Building
Services Engineers includes both approaches for air-
conditioned and naturally-ventilated buildings. In practice,
the two are not really very different; the first allows an
examination of the detail, and the second takes real human
behaviour into account.
From an examination of these approaches it has been
concluded that a peak temperature of 26C will be
acceptable if a relaxed dress code can be adopted that is,
open necks and no jackets. At this temperature, humidity
becomes of greater importance than previously. However, the
current specification of a maximum of 60%RH should be
acceptable.
Executive summary
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
7/32
7
24C Study: Comfort, Productivity and Energy Consumption
The study recognises that it is unlikely that people in air-
conditioned buildings will accept temperatures much higher
than 26C and so designers will need to take care toaddress features such as solar shade. It may also be that a
more considered approach be taken in the design of the
heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems.
PRODUCTIVITY
There has been far less research in this area than in that of
comfort. This is probably because it is quite difficult to define
productivity. Furthermore, the effect that temperature has on
productivity is less clear and depends heavily on the type of
work being done. For example, typing speeds are shown to be
slower at higher temperatures, while memory improves with a
slow increase in temperature up to 26C. Along the same lines
as the placebo effect of thermal comfort, psychology also
affects productivity. According to the Hawthorne Effect, if
management shows an effort to improve conditions (regardless
of whether an improvement has actually been implemented),
occupants generally become more productive.
It is possible that people are most productive at work when
they are least aware of their surroundings. Apart from the
obvious implication of thermal, aural and visual comfort the
statement also implies there are no management issues that
could reduce motivation. Research has identified
management as a key issue in productivity. One researcherhas attempted to correlate productivity with space
temperature suggesting around a 3% drop in productivity at
26C from that achieved at 22C. However the researcher
has low confidence in the relationship. There is therefore
scant evidence to suggest that increasing the setpoint by
2C will have a noticeable effect upon productivity.
ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
The effect of a change in internal temperature on the amount
of energy required to heat spaces is fairly obvious in that the
closer the internal temperature is to that outside the less heat
required. Things are not quite so simple when cooling. This isbecause the main sources of heat gain to the space, solar
radiation, office equipment and lighting are not affected by
the space temperature. The gains from people do reduce as
temperatures increase but only marginally. In addition current
levels of insulation mean that conduction of heat through the
building fabric is unlikely to be seriously affected. The load
imposed by air infiltration through the faade may under some
circumstances be affected but many designs attempt to
pressurise the building and so reduce this to an insignificant
load. The main influence of an increase in internal
temperature will be on the amount of energy required to cool
the fresh air supplied by the air-conditioning system to room
temperature. The study concentrated on this issue.
The design of the air-conditioning system will influence the
amount of energy saved by an increase in space temperature.
This is because some types only supply the minimum or near
minimum amount of fresh air required for a healthy
environment and make use of a secondary source of cooling(water coils) to remove the majority of the heat gain.
Examples are fan coil systems and active chilled beams.
Systems that provide all the cooling in the air supply
(variable air volume for example) handle much more air and
there is scope for free cooling if the external temperature is
not too high. Using a computer model written specifically
for this project the following systems were studied:
Fan coil units.
Variable air volume.
Active chilled beams.
Under floor air supply systems.
Performance was predicted for three locations within the
United Kingdom, London, Manchester and Edinburgh. In each
case the reduction in cooling energy and carbon dioxide
emissions due to the 2C change was calculated for a typical
office building that meets current building regulations.
Humidity was controlled to a maximum of 60%RH.
In addition to the savings made because air is not being
cooled as much, there is a more subtle potential saving
possibility. Reduced cooling of the supply air means that the
temperature of the water supply to the cooling coil could beincreased. This would result in an improvement in the
efficiency of the refrigeration plant, possibly by up to 7.5%.
The predictions suggested, with the exception of the under
floor supply system, savings of 6% (11%), 4%( 10%) and
3.5% (9.5%) in London, Manchester and Edinburgh
respectively. The figures in parenthesis indicate the effect of
an improvement in the efficiency of the refrigeration plant.
The reduction as the building moves North is simply due to
lower outside air temperatures. The predicted saving for the
under floor system are less at 1.1% (9%), 0.5% (7.5%) and
0.3% (7.5%) respectively. This is because air is supplied to
the space at a higher temperature (say 18C as opposed to12-14C). Because the fuel used is assumed to come from a
single source, grid supplied electricity, the percentage
reductions in energy and carbon emissions are identical.
Clearly the air-conditioning is only one source of carbon
dioxide emissions from the building. If all sources are taken
into consideration then, using typical building performance
figures, the maximum predicted reduction in electrical power
consumption is about 0.7%. The reduction in carbon
emissions could be slightly higher, but this will depend upon
the mix of fuels.
These savings are small but are a contribution to thereduction of carbon emissions at virtually no cost and with a
reduction in the fuel bill. It may also be possible to use a
slightly smaller capacity plant and so reduce the capital cost.
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
8/32
8
24C Study: Comfort, Productivity and Energy Consumption
Currently the British Council for Offices recommends that the
temperature within an air-conditioned office should becontrolled to 22C and that the space should have an
acceptable level of humidity; that is, the relative humidity
(RH) should be within the range 40-60%. It is now widely
accepted that there is a need to reduce carbon emissions to
both reduce the rate of climate change and, equally
important, our dependence upon fossil fuels. Buildings are
responsible for a significant component of the United
Kingdoms carbon emissions and so any reduction will be a
useful contribution to the achievement of Government
targets in this area. One way to do this is to increase the
internal temperature in offices when cooling is used. The
British Council for Offices would like to recommend an
increase in the setpoint by 2C, but have some concerns as
to the effect on both occupant comfort and productivity.
They therefore commissioned Arup to carry out a review of
existing research in these areas and also to assess the likely
impact on energy consumption. This is in two main sections:
Comfort and productivity.
Energy consumption.
The first contains a review of current guidelines and research
while the second contains an analysis of the effect of
temperature on the energy consumption and hence carbon
emissions for four typical air conditioning systems.
1. Introduction
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
9/32
9
24C Study: Comfort, Productivity and Energy Consumption
The purpose of this study is as follows:
To summarise existing guidance and standards related to
comfort in the built environment.
To conduct a state-of-the-art literature review on comfort
in air-conditioned offices.
To ascertain the effects of increasing the office control
setpoint temperature from 22C (2C) to 24C (2C)
during summer conditions.
To conduct a state-of-the-art literature review on
productivity and the anticipated effects of increasing the
indoor design temperature by 2K on productivity.
The study of comfort is inevitably one that combines both
objective (quantitative) and subjective (qualitative) findings.
Both types of findings will be reported here. As the main
reason for carrying out this literature review is to understand
the ramifications of increasing the indoor design temperature
on an office environment, the focus of the report is on
thermal comfort rather than other forms of comfort such as
visual, aural, and olfactory comfort. This is not to say that
the other parameters are unimportant, as studies have found
them to have impacts on workplace performance; however,
these studies fall outside the scope of this review.
Similarly, the review of productivity is limited to studies
conducted in office environments and to studies related toindoor temperatures rather than other factors.
2.1 DEFINITIONS
When designing for mechanical heating and/or cooling, it is
important to distinguish what the reason is for tempering
the environment. That is, is it a question of health and
safety, or is it a question of comfort? If it is a question of
health and safety, a wider range of indoor temperatures is
allowed as long as temperatures do not reach levels that
induce heat or cold stress in the upper and lower extremes,
respectively, of the temperature range. If, however, it is a
question of comfort, a much narrower range is consideredtolerable by occupants of the indoor space. Clearly, there are
temperatures outside a comfortable range at which an
occupant is not at risk from a health and safety point of
view. This study focuses on the comfort aspects of air-
conditioned office spaces. The definition of air-conditionedis the control of air temperature and relative humidity.
2.1.1 Thermal Comfort
Thermal comfort is defined as that condition of mind which
expresses satisfaction with the thermal environment and is
assessed by subjective evaluation (ASHRAE). The following
is a list of environmental factors affecting thermal comfort:
Air temperature.
Radiant temperature.
Air speed.
Humidity.
Additionally, there are personal factors that affect thermal
comfort, and these are as follows:
Clothing insulation measured in clo (1 clo = 0.155m2 C/W).
Activity level measured in met (1 met = 58.2 W/m2).
A typical business suit has an insulation level of 1 clo, and
normal office work corresponds to an activity level of 1 met.
As the aim of this study is to look at increasing the control
setpoint temperature in offices specifically, the following
assumptions were made:
Offices are air-conditioned.
Occupants are seated; sedentary or near-sedentary physical
activity level.
Occupants are clothed between 0.5 and 1.0 clo (ASHRAE).
2.1.2 Productivity
Productivity, like comfort, is difficult to define objectively as
many subjective factors affect workplace performance.
However, it can be defined broadly as the ratio of output to
input (CIBSE, TM24:1999). What constitutes the output and
input, however, is something that is not clearly and
absolutely defined.
2. Comfort and productivity
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
10/32
10
24C Study: Comfort, Productivity and Energy Consumption
2.2 EXISTING GUIDANCE AND STANDARDS
2.2.1 BRITISH COUNCIL FOR OFFICES GUIDE 2005
The British Council for Offices Guide 2005: Best practice in
the specification for offices currently specifies the following
design conditions for air-conditioned offices:
Summer:
Design indoor temperature: 22C 2C
Note: The industry standard for summertime relative
humidity limits is 50% 10%.
Winter: Design indoor temperature: 20C 2C
A minimum recommendation of 35-40% RH has been set
by the BCO if the fresh air rate equals or exceeds 2.0
l/s/m2
For buildings without mechanical cooling, the BCO guide
states that predicted thermal comfort is based on the
percentage of occupied hours for which particular internal
temperatures are expected to exceed 25C. The thermal
comfort is measured using the percent people dissatisfied
(PPD) method from the International Standard, ISO 7730,
aiming for a maximum PPD of 10%.
The BCO guide also points out a 1999 field study by de Dear
et al. in which the preferred temperature was determined to
be 23.5C.
2.2.2 CIBSE Guide A: Environmental Design
The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers
(CIBSE) published the 2006 version ofCIBSE Guide A:
Environmental Design, and Chapter 1 addresses
Environmental criteria for design. Guide A is a best practice
guide which is based on the ISO Standard 7730. Guide A
uses an operative temperature to convey the combined
effects of air temperature and mean radiant temperature. Theoperative temperature is defined as follows:
Tc = HTai + (1H)Tr (Equation 3.2.1)
Where:
Tc = operative temperature (C)
H = hr/ (hc+ hr)
hr = surface heat transfer coefficient by radiation
hc = surface heat transfer coefficient by convection
Tai = indoor air temperature (C)
Tr = mean radiant temperature (C)
A comfort zone is defined by -0.5 < PMV < 0.5, or 80%occupant acceptability, which is the same as ASHRAE
Standard 55-2004 (see Section 3.3). This 80% allows for
10% dissatisfaction with general thermal comfort and an
additional 10% dissatisfaction due to local thermal
discomfort. Guide A points out that the predicted mean
vote (PMV) combines the influence of air temperature, air
movement and humidity with that of clothing and activity
level into one value on a thermal sensation scale. However,
the PPD assumption of uniform clothing may actually
overestimate discomfort since, in reality, personal choice of
clothing is at play.
2.2.2.1 Temperature
Guide A states that temperature is usually the most
important environmental variable affecting thermal comfort,
and a change of 3K correlates to 1 scale unit difference on a
thermal sensation scale for sedentary subjects.
For offices in the summertime, Guide A, Table 1.5
recommends a temperature range between 22C and 24C for
offices in which the assumed activity level is 1.2 met and
clothing insulation level is 0.7 clo.
Temperature differences in the vertical should be limited to
a maximum of 3K between the ankles and head, but
temperature differences in the horizontal may be desirable as
this allows occupants to choose to move from a less
comfortable to more comfortable location.
2.2.2.2 Air Speed and Movement
The recommended upper limit for air speeds in a
mechanically-ventilated building is 0.3 m/s, according to
Guide A. Air speeds greater than this would be considered
unacceptable due to draught dissatisfaction, which is a
function of air speed, local air temperature, and fluctuations
in air speed. The draught rating (DR) is given by the
following equation:
DR = (34Tai)(v0.05)0.62(0.37vTu + 3.14) (Equation 3.2.2.1)
Where:
v = local mean air speed (m/s)
Tu = local turbulence intensity (%)
CIBSE Guide A points out that acceptable operative
temperatures can rise with increased air speeds. This
phenomenon will be discussed further in a later section.
Also, as activity levels increase, so do the relative air speeds
over the body surface.
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
11/32
11
24C Study: Comfort, Productivity and Energy Consumption
2.2.2.3 Gender and Age DifferencesCIBSE Guide A explains differences between genders and age
groups. In general, the clothing insulation level for women
is lower than that for men, so women tend to vote lower on
a thermal sensation scale. Regarding age, there is not much
variation as the lower metabolic rate in older people is
compensated by a lower evaporative loss.
2.2.2.4 Adaptive Approach
Humphreys and Nicol proposed using an adaptive approach
to designing for the indoor environment. Their approach is
based on extensive field studies of subjects in their everyday
work environment rather than in a climate chamber. Thus,
the effects of the subjects adapting to the thermal
environment by adjusting say, their clothing insulation level
or behaviour, would be accounted for in the thermal comfort
predictions. Humphreys and Nicol argue that occupant
adjustments are a result of recent past experience. For
example, if yesterday was too cold, occupants would be more
likely to increase clothing insulation levels the next day.
Based on this logic, historical daily mean external air
temperatures are weighted according to their proximity to
the current day. The following equation gives the running
mean external air temperature for day n:
Trm(n) = (1rm)Te(d1) + rmTrm(n1) (Equation3.2.4.1)
Where:
Trm(n) = running mean temperature (C)
rm = a constant between 0 and 1 that defines
the rate at which the running mean
temperature responds to external temperature
Te(d1) = daily mean external temperature for
the day before the previous day (C)
Trm(n1) = running mean temperature for day (n-1) (C)
For heated and/or cooled buildings, the upper and lower
comfort bands are given by the following equations,
respectively:
a) Tcom = 0.09Trm + 24.6 (Equation 3.2.4.2)
b) Tcom = 0.09Trm + 20.6 (Equation 3.2.4.3)
Where Tcom = comfort temperature (C)
Figure 1 shows the comfort bands for buildings withheated/cooled operation.
Figure 1 80% comfort zones (2K) in offices related to the
running mean of the outdoor temperature
The adaptive approach allows operative temperature to drift
so long as it occurs slowly over the period of a few days.
Note: A similar approach is proposed for a revised Dutch
comfort standard (Raue et al.).
2.2.2.5 Additional Recommendations
When the operative temperature is high, CIBSE Guide A
recommends the following measures:
Relaxing the office dress code.
Allowing individual control (e.g., adjusting blinds, moving
away from sunny areas).
Permitting flexible working hours.
Increasing air movement.
Providing hot or cold drinks (Note: Hot drinks trigger a
sweating response.)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Comfort temperature upper limit (C)
Comfort temperature lower limit (C)
302520151050
Outdoor running mean temperature (C)
Indoortemperaturelimits(C)
-
8/7/2019 24 Degrees - Confort Productivity and energy Consuption
12/32
2.2.3 ASHRAE STANDARD 55-2004The American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-
Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) last updated their thermal
comfort standard in 2004, following ISO 7730:1995. ASHRAE
Standard 55-2004: Thermal Environmental Conditions for
Human Occupancy uses the operative temperature to
determine a comfort zone. An operative temperature for
given values of humidity, air speed, metabolic rate, and
clothing insulation, combines the dry-bulb air temperature
with the mean radiant temperature into a single value.
2.2.3.1 Assumptions
For office settings, it is assumed that the metabolic rates
would be between 1.0 and 1.3 met, and the clothing
insulation would be between 0.5 and 1.0 clo. It is also
assumed that the conditions are at steady state, and the
occupants are healthy adults at atmospheric pressure up to
an altitude of 3000m. They must also be in the office space
for at least 15 minutes.
2.2.3.2 PMV-PPD Index
The standard also illustrates the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV)
and Percent People Dissatisfied (PPD) method of determining
the comfort zone, as developed by Fanger. His studies were
carried out in climate chambers, which are carefully
controlled environments that are not entirely representative
of everyday office work environments. However, they provide
the advantage of being able to adjust certain variables while
keeping others constant.
The PMV-PPD index uses a heat balance model to arrive at
predictions of thermal comfort, and the heat balance model
accounts for clothing insulation, metabolic rate, and
environmental parameters. A deep-body temperature of 37C
is sought as the point for the human thermo-regulatory
system.
The 7-point ASHRAE thermal sensation scale is defined as
follows:
+3 hot
+2 warm
+1 slightly warm
0 neutral
-1 slightly cool
-2 cool
-3 cold
PPD is related to PMV by the following equation:
PPD = 100 95e
(-0.03353PMV4 0.2179PMV2)
(Equation 3.3.2.1)
Figure 2 shows the relationship between PPD and PMV.
Figure 2 Percentage Persons dissatisfied (PPD) as a function
of predicted mean vote (PMV)
2.2.3.3 Acceptability Criteria
In this ASHRAE standard, a comfort zone is defined by -0.5