2.2--comparative advantage, trade, and globalization

Upload: hummairaa-haz

Post on 14-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    1/15

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Comparative Advantage

    and Trade

    2-1

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    2/15

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-2

    Economic Growth In the

    Past Two Thousand Years$6,000

    $5,000

    $4,000

    $3,000

    $2,000$1,000

    2010150010005000

    P

    ercapitainco

    me

    (in1990dolla

    rs)

    WHY?

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    3/15

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    The Economics of Babe Ruth

    2-3

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    4/15

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Babe Ruth Statistics

    Boston Red Sox Pitcher

    1915 18-8 2.44

    1916 23-12 1.75*

    1917 24-13 2.011918 13-7 2.22 *Means

    New York Yankee Right Fielder led the

    1918 11* .300 league1920 54* .376

    1923 41* .393*

    1927 60* .356

    2-4

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    5/15

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Comparative Advantage

    Comparative Advantagethe relativelymost productive use of a resource

    Hitting was the Babes comparativeadvantage

    Very good pitcherplayed every 4-5 days

    Great hitterplayed every day and changedthe game forever

    Specializedpitched a total of only 5games after 1919

    2-5

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    6/15

    McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-6

    Production Possibilities

    Without TradeProduction Possibilities Curves

    for Pakistan and Belgium

    What does each country dobest? Hint: Think opportunitycosts.

    1 2 3 4

    4

    3

    2

    1

    5

    Chocolate (in tons)

    Textiles

    (inthousandsof

    yards)

    Belgium

    Pakistan

    A

    B

    E

    D

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    7/15McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-7

    Specialization and Trade

    How could they get to point C where eachcountry can consume 2,000 tons of fabricand 2 tons of chocolate?

    1 2 3 4

    4

    3

    2

    1

    5

    Chocolate (in tons)

    Textiles

    (inthousandsof

    yards)

    Belgium

    Pakistan

    A

    B

    C

    E

    D

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    8/15McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-8

    Specialization and

    Comparative AdvantageFor Pakistan the opportunity cost of one ton of chocolateis 4000 yards of textiles.

    For Belgium the opportunity cost of one ton of chocolateis 250 yards of textiles.

    Belgium has the comparative advantage in chocolateand specializes producing 4 tons (point E). Pakistanhas the comparative advantage in textiles andspecializes producing 4000 yards (point D).

    1 2 3 4

    4

    3

    2

    1

    5

    Chocolate (in tons)

    Textiles

    (inthousandsof

    yards)

    Belgium

    Pakistan

    A

    B

    C

    E

    D

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    9/15McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-9

    Comparative Advantage and

    the Combined PPC

    1 2 3 4 5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    5

    Chocolate (in tons)

    Textiles

    (inthousandsofyard

    s)

    Belgium

    Pakistan

    H(4,4)

    F (0,5)

    G (5,0)

    Note how much more they canhave if they specialize and trade

    The combined PPC is the curveconnecting points F, H, and G.

    . C (2,2)

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    10/15McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-10

    U.S. Textile

    Production and Trade

    Two hundred years ago, the U.S. had acomparative advantage in textileproduction.

    Now countries with cheaper labor, suchas Bangladesh, have the comparative

    advantage in textiles. The gains from trade are higher wages for

    workers in Bangladesh and lower-pricedcloth for U.S. consumers.

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    11/15McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-11

    Comparative Advantage Review

    Suppose that the U.S. can produce 100 computer chips

    or 100 video games in one hour. Japan can produce 40computer chips or 80 video games in one hour.

    What is the opportunity cost of computer chips in each

    country?

    In which product should each countryspecialize?

    The U.S. is more efficient in producing both computerchips and video games. Can the U.S. benefit by tradingwith Japan?

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    12/15McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-12

    In the U.S. the opportunity cost of 1 video game is 80/80= 1 computer chip.

    In Japan the opportunity cost of 1 computer chip is 80/40= 2 video games.

    U.S. should specialize in computer chips.

    Produces 100 per hourJapan should specialize in video games.

    Produces 80 per hour

    They agree to trade 1 computer chip for 1.5 video gamesU.S. gets video games for 2/3 of a computer chipJapan gets computer chips for 1.5 video games

    Both countries have reduced their opportunity costs

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    13/15McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-13

    Comparative Advantage and

    Outsourcing Outsourcing : The relocation of production once

    done in the U.S. to foreign countries.

    Outsourcing occurs because of comparativeadvantage

    What is the comparative advantage of countries such as India

    and China? What is the comparative advantage of the U.S.?

    What economic activities are being outsourced?

    2 14

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    14/15McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

    2-14

    Globalization Globalization: The increasing

    integration of economies, cultures,and institutions across the world.

    The positive effect of globalization isthat it provides larger markets than thedomestic economy.

    The negative effect is that it results inincreased competition.

    2 15

  • 7/30/2019 2.2--Comparative Advantage, Trade, And Globalization

    15/15McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc All rights reserved

    2-15

    Law of One Price

    Wages of similar workers in one countrywill not differ significantly from the wagesof workers in another institutionallysimilar country.

    If the U.S. loses its comparative advantage

    based on technology and institutionalstructure, U.S. wages will decreaserelative to wages in many other countries.