2016 asprs track: overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

83
Overview and User Perspective of 3DEP Lidar John J. Kosovich U.S. Geological Survey Denver, CO [email protected] September 22, 2016

Upload: gis-in-the-rockies

Post on 07-Jan-2017

79 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Overview and User Perspective

of 3DEP LidarJohn J. Kosovich

U.S. Geological SurveyDenver, CO

[email protected] 22, 2016

Page 2: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Disclaimer

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes

only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.

Government.

Page 3: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

TerminologyIfSAR = interferometric synthetic aperture radar - Radar = radio detection and ranging. - Radar (microwave) pulses spread over surface perpendicular to airplane (side look). - Accurate DEM obtained from phase difference & timing of returning pulses. - Also get Radar DOQ (ORI) from magnitude (intensity) of returning pulses. - Active sensing: can collect at night. - Can see through typical cloud cover.

lidar = light detection and ranging (topographic) - Laser pulse hits surface thousands of times each second as airplane flies. - Main product is an irregularly spaced “point-cloud” of lidar hits (“returns”). - Very accurate gridded DEM is derived from ground returns. - Can get lidar intensity image (ortho-rectified, grayscale). - Active sensing: can collect at night. - Cannot see through typical cloud cover. - Typically called “linear lidar”. - Also have bathymetric lidar, uses different wavelength to penetrate water.

- Latest technologies: multispectral, single-photon (SP), and Geiger-mode (GM) lidar.

Page 4: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

From EarthData, Inc. original

• Lidar = light detection and ranging

• Active sensing: can collect at night

• Cannot “see” through typical cloud cover

• Timing of returned pulse gives elevation

• Magnitude of returned pulse gives intensity

• Minimum of thousands of pulses per second (KhZ+)

• Multiple returns potentially from each transmitted pulse

Lidar Collection

Page 5: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

From EarthData, Inc. original

Multiple Returns per pulseMultiple Returns

Page 6: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Lidar Terminology“Linear” = traditional, where laser pulses are sent and returned in sequence. Can be aerial-, tripod-, or satellite-based.

Terrestrial = tripod, close range, extremely dense (~1000s of points / m ).

Waveform = Entire pulse’s returned energy signature digitized, peaks typically become the discrete points. Waveforms are not always saved unless required by customer.

Discrete returns = Points from pulse where returned energy from waveform is greatest.

Multiple returns = each pulse may hit more than one object and continue down, resulting in several discrete returns (points) per pulse.

Point cloud = all returns from all pulses. Points located in X,Y,Z coordinate space.

Point density = nominal number of points per unit area (2D space, usually 1st returns).

Point (pulse) spacing = nominal spacing between points (2D space, usually 1st returns).

DSM = digital surface model, gridded raster, contains canopy, buildings, etc.

DTM = digital terrain model, gridded raster, bare-earth ground DEM.

Intensity = grayscale raster made from energy intensity of return points.

2

Page 7: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Waveform vs. Discrete

Courtesy of Optech, Incorporated and Remote Sensing Open Access JournalUssyshkin, V., and Theriault, L., Airborne Lidar: Advances in Discrete Return Technology for 3D Vegetation Mapping. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 416-434, Figure 6.

Page 8: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Gridded Lidar DEMs (canopy height model and bare-earth ground) do not contain true 3D structure, but the point cloud does:

Why Use Point Cloud?

Lidar digital surface model (DSM) = Canopy Height Model (CHM)

for forested areas

Lidar point cloud

Lidar digital terrain model (DTM) = bare-earth ground surface

Page 9: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

X-band IfSAR

Typical lidar:topo ~1064 nm,bathy ~400 - 532 nm

Electromagnetic Spectrum

P-band IfSAR

EM spectrum image from Intermap Technologies, Inc. original

Page 10: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Electromagnetic Spectrum

EM spectrum image from Intermap Technologies, Inc. original

Time

Time

Longer wavelength, lower frequency (wave)Lower photon energy (quantum particle)

Shorter wavelength, higher frequency (wave)Higher photon energy (quantum particle)

Speed of light ≈ 3.0 x 10 meters/sec ≈ (186,000 miles/sec)

c = λ x ν = wavelength x frequency

8

(in a vacuum)

Page 11: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

10m USGS DEM

Page 12: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

1m Lidar Terrain Model

Page 13: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

DEM Horizontal Resolution

10m

2m

30m

1m

Photo by John Kosovich, USGS

Page 14: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP(3D Elevation Program)

Products

Page 15: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Productshttp://nationalmap.gov/3DEP

Page 16: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Products

Page 17: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Products

Page 18: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Products

Page 19: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availabilityhttp://nationalmap.gov/3DEP

Page 20: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availabilityhttp://nationalmap.gov/3DEP/3dep_prodavailability.html#/

Page 21: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 22: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 23: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 24: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Quality Level (QL)Point density = nominal number of points per unit area (pts/m ).

Point (pulse) spacing = nominal spacing between points (m).

2

point density =1

(point spacing) 2point spacing =

1

point density

0 1m 2

QL1: 8 pts/m density 0.35m spacing

2

0 1m 2

QL2: 2 pts/m density 0.7m spacing

2

0 1m 2

QL3: 0.5 pts/m density 1.4m spacing

2

Page 25: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 26: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 27: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 28: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 29: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 30: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 31: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 32: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 33: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 34: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Availability

Page 35: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP Product Downloadhttp://nationalmap.gov/3DEP/3dep_prodavailability.html#/

Page 36: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/?basemap=b1&category=ned,nedsrc&title=3DEP%20View

3DEP Product Download

Page 37: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/?basemap=b1&category=ned,nedsrc&title=3DEP%20View

3DEP Product Download

Page 38: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/?basemap=b1&category=ned,nedsrc&title=3DEP%20View

3DEP Product Download

Page 39: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

3DEP ProductsDelivered By Vendor

Page 40: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

NGP Lidar Deliverables

Required by USGS Lidar Base Spec v1.2 (2014):http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11b4/

Quality Level 2 or better (0.7m spacing, 2 pts/m )Raw Point Cloud (flight line swaths, .LAS file format)Classified Point Cloud (tiled .LAS as per project, includes intensity values for each return)Bare-Earth Surface DEM (= DTM, 32-bit raster format)Breaklines used in hydro-flattening (ESRI vector)Metadata (FGDC-compliant)

2

Page 41: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Raw Point Cloud

All points are unclassified

Page 42: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Classified Point Cloud

Page 43: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Point Cloud ClassesRequired by USGS Lidar Base Specification 1.2 (pg. 11)

Page 44: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Point Cloud ClassesASPRS LAS Specification, Version 1.4 – R13, July 15, 2013, pg. 17

http://www.asprs.org/a/society/committees/standards/LAS_1_4_r13.pdf

Page 45: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Lidar Point Cloud

Page 46: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Noise hit: ~400 m (~1300 ft) above

ground(Not classified as Noise, had to be

edited)

Noise hit: ~700 m (~2300 ft) below

ground(Not classified as Noise, had to be

edited)

Contrails ~2000m (~6500 ft) above

ground:(These were

classified as Noise by vendor)

Noise (2011 ARRA)

Page 47: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Classified Point Cloud

Page 48: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Non-Lidar Comparison Image(not a deliverable product)

Page 49: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Lidar Digital Terrain Model (DTM)

Page 50: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

ProductsDerivable

FromPoint Cloud

Page 51: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Lidar Digital Surface Model (DSM)

Page 52: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Lidar Digital Terrain Model (DTM) - from Vendor

Page 53: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

DSM-DTM Diff GridOutput product -- Lidar Digital Surface Model minus Digital Terrain Model difference surface

Page 54: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

DSM-DTM Diff ImageOutput product -- 5-color Digital Surface Model minus Digital Terrain Model difference image

Page 55: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

DSM-DTM Diff ImageInteractive ArcMap transparency over DSM hillshade

Page 56: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

DSM – DTM DifferenceDifference surface derived from lidar: normalized (topography removed) canopy heights above

ground

Page 57: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Edited Point Cloud

Page 58: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Lidar Intensity – 1st Returns

Page 59: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Lidar Intensity – 2nd Returns

Page 60: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Lidar Intensity – 3rd Returns

Page 61: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Lidar Intensity – Last Returns

Page 62: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

11-band Image Derived from Lidar Intensity

Bands 11,1,4 as R,G,B: unaltered 1st returns, 1st -to-Last returns, 2nd-to-Last returns ratios

Page 63: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Delineate Features for MapBands 11,1,4 as R,G,B: unaltered 1st returns, 1st -to-Last returns, 2nd-to-Last returns ratios

Page 64: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Make MapPolygons solely from lidar intensity images, power lines from point cloud, hillshade from DTM)

Ü

Page 65: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Comparison ImageArcGIS Basemap image

Page 66: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

LatestLidar

Technologies

Page 67: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Multispectral Lidar

From Teledyne Optech: http://www.teledyneoptech.com/index.php/product/titan/

IR 1550 nmNIR 1064 nmBathy 532 nm

Page 68: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Single Photon (SP)Single Photon Counting Lidar - Sigma Space Corporation (Hexagon Geospatial) developed HRQLS (high resolution quantum lidar system). - 532nm green laser transmitted pulses are diffracted into 10 x 10 beamlets. - Receiver array can detect single photons. - Topographic and bathymetric collection. - Decent vegetation penetration (per USGS evaluation reported at 2016 ILMF). - Company has since improved HRQLS for better vegetation penetration. - Reflectance image made from photon count per pixel, ~ similar to intensity image from “linear” lidar.

Courtesy of Sigma Space Corp. and LaserFocusWorldhttp://www.laserfocusworld.com/articles/print/volume-47/issue-9/world-news/lidar-photon-counting-3d-imaging-lidar-measures-biomass-and-the-cryosphere.html

Page 69: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Geiger-Mode (GM)Geiger-Mode Lidar - Harris Corporation developed IntelliEarth sensor (Palmer scanner, SP Avalanche Photodiode). - 1064nm IR laser pulses produce elliptical sweep over flight line. - Sensor samples the same ground area multiple times. - Multi-angle illumination of target area. - Receiver consists of 32 x 128 array of photon-counting detectors (= 4096 total). - Topographic collection. - Poor vegetation penetration (per USGS evaluation), but improvements promised. - Reflectance image made from photon count per pixel, ~ similar to intensity image from “linear” lidar.

TM

Courtesy of Harris Corporationhttp://asprs.org/a/publications/proceedings/IGTF2015/5H[4]-slides.pdf

Page 70: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

SP and GM LinksILMF Write-up of USGS Evaluation Report:http://www.spar3d.com/news/lidar/single-photon-and-geiger-mode-vs-linear-mode-lidar/

Single Photon Lidar:http://www.spar3d.com/news/lidar/single-photon-lidar-proven-forest-mapping/

Geiger Mode Lidar:http://asprs.org/a/publications/proceedings/IGTF2015/5H[4]-slides.pdf

Page 71: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

TerrestrialLidar

(Not in 3DEP)

Page 72: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Photo by John Kosovich, USGS

Terrestrial Laser Scanning

Page 73: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Photo by John Kosovich, USGS

Spherical Targets

Page 74: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Slide by John Kosovich, USGS

Terrestrial Lidar Data

Terrestrial and Aerial Lidar

Page 75: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Slide by John Kosovich, USGS

Terrestrial vs. Aerial Lidar

Page 76: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Slide by John Kosovich, USGS

Terrestrial vs. Aerial Lidar

Page 77: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Slide by John Kosovich, USGS

Terrestrial vs. Aerial Lidar

Page 78: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Slide by John Kosovich, USGS

Terrestrial vs. Aerial Lidar

Page 79: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Photo by Dick Grauch, USGS

August, 2007

Slump

Change Detection

Page 80: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Slide by John Kosovich, USGS

M2_2007

Slump

Change Detection - 2007

Page 81: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Slide by John Kosovich, USGS

Slump

New Slump

M2_2008

Change Detection - 2008

Page 82: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

Slide by John Kosovich, USGS

2008 – 2007 Difference2008 minus 2007:

Old Slump

New Slump

Page 83: 2016 asprs track:  overview and user perspective of usgs 3 dep lidar by john kosovich

QUESTIONS?