2014_developing network resilience

31
Aaron Gracey MA MSc PGCE FInstLM DEVELOPING NETWORK RESILIENCE

Upload: aaron-gracey-ma-msc-pgce-finstlm

Post on 21-Aug-2015

44 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Aaron Gracey MA MSc PGCE FInstLM

DEVELOPING NETWORK RESILIENCE

PRE WORKSHOP CASE STUDY

Case Study:

• Occurred 17th August 2010

• Multiple issues

• Divide into three groups to examine:

Incident (all)

Strategic advice to others

Mapping requirements

Command, control, co-ordination & communications

Resi l ience through leadership 4

Introduction

The Resilience Model

Command and Control Structure

Immediate Response

Identifying Stakeholders

Managing the incident

Decision making

Legislation

Summary

INTRODUCTION

18 years in MoD

Senior Technical Weapons Officer

Last role was an executive Crisis management Command and Control trainer

Resilience Consultant to UK Cabinet Office

Industry Culture and Change Agent

Network Rail Operational Services Learning and Development Specialist

Rail Industry Strategic Incident Command trained

BACKGROUND

THE RESILIENCE MODEL

THE RESILIENCE MODEL

Resi l ience through leadership 8

Click icon to add picture

TASK ONE - CURRENT ISSUES

In your groups, consider the top six issues you think affect a successful incident response by the rail industry.

Resi l ience through leadership 9

Click icon to add picture

CURRENT ISSUES

Resilience in the Railway industry is limited

Poor level of strategic and tactical training

Limited cross industry understanding and collaborative working

A very reactive industry

Limited understanding of proactive planning and working with emergency services

Silo mentality

In your groups place these events in escalating order. Be prepared to explain your reasoning for your decisions:

» Emergency

» Crisis

» Incident

» Disaster

» Catastrophe

TASK TWO – DISRUPTIVE EVENT HIERARCHY

Resi l ience through leadership 11

DISRUPTIVE EVENTS

Developed from academic research

Graduation in impact and scope

Most organisations have practices that can deal with incidents and emergencies

Crisis and beyond become “complex” problems

COMMAND AND CONTROL STRUCTURE

Resi l ience through leadership 13

THE THREE LEVELS OF COMMAND

14

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Gold (strategic):

• Sets the strategy

• Provides the resources

• Provides support to Silver

• Sets tactical parameters

• Consider location?

15

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Silver (tactical):

• Tactical plan to deliver strategy

• Manage the site / scene

• Liaison

• Appoint ‘Bronze’ roles

• Update ‘Gold’

16

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Bronze (operational):

• Implement Tactical Plan

• Understand the strategy

• Manage specific resources

• Carry out functional / geographic role(s)

• Liaise with ‘Silver’

17

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

In groups, consider and record:

• Tactics to deliver the plan?

• Expected strategy?

• Probably & possible roles?

• Site / Scene management issues

• Partners?

• ‘Bronze’ roles?

18

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

In groups, consider and record:

• Contents of tactical plan?

• Achievability of the strategy?

• Tactical management of site / scene?

• Liaison with whom?

• ‘Bronze’ roles?

• Frequency & content of updates?

19

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

In groups, consider and record:

• Strategic considerations?

• What resources?

• What support?

• What tactical parameters?

• Where would you locate?

• Partners / stakeholders?

Click icon to add picture

TASK THREE – DRESS THE DECISION MAKER

In your groups consider the skills, behaviours, knowledge and training for the following roles:

‒ Station Incident Officer

‒ Rail Incident Officer

‒ Incident Controller

‒ Route Control Manager

‒ Rail Incident Commander

DECISION MAKING

Paper trail is important in the decision making process

All decisions and the rationale need to be captured

Decisions and any documents used are evidence – needs to be protected and secured for further investigations

Consider “Scoggins’ Law” when making decisions.

DECISION MAKING

2323

Reasonably Foreseeable?

Did you have a plan?

Was the plan implemented?

Did the plan work?

Were all decisions recorded?

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

Minimum standard

Minimum standard

Minimum

standard

Minimum standard

Minimum standard

competent?

Fit to operate?

Reasons?

Review?

Where next?

DECISION MAKING & LOGGIST FUNCTIONS

THE IMMEDIATE RESPONSE

IDENTIFYING STAKEHOLDERS

Resi l ience through leadership 26

WHAT IS A STAKEHOLDER

Stakeholder:

‒ A person, group or organization that has direct or indirect stake in an organization because it can affect or be affected by the organisations actions, objectives and policies. Key stakeholders in a business organization include creditors, customers, employees, directors, govt, (and its agencies), owners, shareholders, suppliers, unions and the community from which it draws its business and draws its resources.

Partner

‒ Individual who joins with other individuals (partners) in an arrangement (partnership) where gains, and losses, risks and rewards are shared amongst the partners.

Resi l ience through leadership 27

TASK FOUR - IDENTIFYING STAKEHOLDERS

In your groups consider the incident that you have reviewed prior to this session

Discuss this amongst your group

Collectively identify the relevant stakeholders that are affected by this event

Create a brief description of the incident identifying as many of the different organisations involved as you can

Record these of a flip chart- 10 minutes and present

MANAGING THE INCIDENT

LEGISLATION

EXERCISE TOTALISE

[email protected] | www.squared.apples.co.uk | T: 07443488195

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME