2014 accountability updates

14
OCTOBER 2014 2014 Accountability Updates

Upload: maya-saunders

Post on 03-Jan-2016

21 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

2014 Accountability Updates. October 2014. Annual Measurable Objectives. Achievement AMOs Achievement Gap Closure AMOs Subgroup Improvement All AMOs are set based on previous achievement. Achievement AMOs. 3-8 RLA 3-8 Math 3 rd Grade RLA 3 rd Grade Math 7 th Grade RLA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2014 Accountability Updates

OCTOBER 2014

2014 Accountability Updates

Page 2: 2014 Accountability Updates

Annual Measurable Objectives

Achievement AMOsAchievement Gap Closure AMOsSubgroup Improvement

All AMOs are set based on previous achievement

Page 3: 2014 Accountability Updates

Achievement AMOs

3-8 RLA

3-8 Math

3rd Grade RLA

3rd Grade Math

7th Grade RLA

7th Grade Math

Algebra I

Algebra II

English II

English III

High School

Graduation Rate

Page 4: 2014 Accountability Updates

Achievement Gap Closure AMOs

Students with Disabilities v. Students without Disabilities

Economically Disadvantaged v. Not Economically Disadvantaged

Racial/Ethnic Subgroups (Black/Hispanic/Native American) v. ALL Students

Limited English Proficient v. Not Limited English Proficient

Page 5: 2014 Accountability Updates

District Achievement

Achievement Targets 2013 % P+A

2014 AMO Target 2014 %P+A

2013 to 2014 Change

2013 to 2014 Change State Safe Harbor

Met/Miss after Safe

Harbor

3rd-8th RLA 41.9% 45.5% 40.9% -1.0% -1.0% No Miss3rd-8th Math 41.0% 44.7% 43.9% +2.9% 0.5% Yes Met

3rd RLA 43.1% 46.7% 41.9% -1.2% -5.1% Yes Met

3rd Math 52.7% 55.7% 56.8% +4.1% -2.7% NA Met

7th RLA 34.4% 38.5% 38.9% +4.5% 3.5% NA Met

7th Math 35.9% 39.9% 34.7% -1.2% -2.6% Yes Met

Algebra I 60.7% 63.2% 65.5% +4.8% 2.1% NA Met

English II 55.7% 58.5% 56.9% +1.2% 3.9% Yes Met

Grad Rate 94.9% 95.2% 93.4% -1.8% No Miss

English III 33.3% 37.5% 31.8% -1.5% -1.5% No Miss

Algebra II 35.6% 39.6% 43.1% +7.5% +5.9% NA Met

Page 6: 2014 Accountability Updates

District Achievement Gap

Achievement Gap Targets 2013 Gap

2014 AMO Target 2014 Gap 2014 State Gap Safe Harbor

Met/Miss after Safe Harbor

BHN vs. ALL 3rd-8th RLA 13.5% 12.7% 14.4% 16.3% No MissBHN vs. ALL 3rd-8th Math 11.3% 10.6% 12.6% 14.6% No MissBHN vs. ALL Algebra I/II 20.1% 18.8% 22.2% 14.8% No MissBHN vs. ALL English II/III 22.0% 20.6% 20.5% 16.5% NA MetED vs. Non-ED 3rd-8th RLA 21.5% 20.2% 21.0% 29.9% No MissED vs Non-ED 3rd-8th Math 21.7% 20.3% 20.8% 26.6% No MissED vs. Non-ED Algebra I/II 18.1% 17.0% 14.7% 23.0% NA MetED vs. Non-ED English II/III 23.5% 22.0% 26.8% 26.6% No MissSWD vs. SWOD 3rd-8th RLA 19.9% 18.7% 16.3% 25.1% NA MetSWD vs. SWOD 3rd-8th Math 19.5% 18.3% 18.5% 26.4% No MissSWD vs. SWOD Algebra I/II 39.1% 36.7% 35.3% 36.0% NA MetSWD vs. SWOD English II/III 31.4% 29.4% 33.7% 39.1% No Miss

Page 7: 2014 Accountability Updates

Subgroup Improvement

SubgroupImprove in Half or

More?

Black YES

Economically Disadvantaged YES

Hispanic YES

Students with Disabilities YES

White YES

In 2014, ALL subgroups improved in half or more subjects!

Page 8: 2014 Accountability Updates

Monroe County 2014 Status

Achievement AMO Test: Met 8 of 11 Achievement Gap Closure AMO Test: Met 4 of

12Subgroup Improvement Test:

Black: Improve Hispanic: Improve White: Improve Economically Disadvantaged: Improve Students with Disabilities: Improve

FINAL DISTRICT STATUS: Achieve, Intermediate

Page 9: 2014 Accountability Updates

Focus Schools

One school in Monroe County has been identified as a Focus School for 2015 based on the achievement gap between economically disadvantaged students and non-economically disadvantaged students:

Rural Vale School

(*Note - In 2012, five Monroe County Schools were identified as Focus Schools.)

Page 10: 2014 Accountability Updates

Student Growth

TVAAS: Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System TVAAS is a data analysis system that analyzes the academic

growth of students. TVAAS measures the impact schools and teachers have on their

students’ academic progress. It measures student growth, not whether the student is proficient on the state assessment.

Each student has an academic expectation based on previous assessments. Teachers are expected to meet that expectation. If they do so, their growth measure is considered zero. This translates to a Level 3 in our teacher evaluation system. If students achieve higher than expected, teachers and schools will be a Level 4 or 5. If students achieve lower than expected, teachers and schools will be a Level 2 or 1.

Page 11: 2014 Accountability Updates

Monroe County TVAAS

Literacy Numeracy Literacy + Numeracy

Composite0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Monroe County TVAAS Composites

Page 12: 2014 Accountability Updates

2014 Graduation Rate

District 95.21%Sequoyah High School 95.96%

Sweetwater High School 95.8%

Tellico Plains High School 94.57%

Monroe Academy 92.96%

Page 13: 2014 Accountability Updates

Summary

Overall, Monroe County Schools have shown improvement and growth over the last year

Highlights include: Graduation Rate K-8 Math Algebra I

Greatest opportunities for improvement: K-8 Reading/Language Arts

Page 14: 2014 Accountability Updates

Questions

Lee Anne StricklandAccountability and Data CoordinatorMonroe County [email protected]