2013 tesc - corridor modernization tesc - corridor... · management team (pemt) planning &...
TRANSCRIPT
www.dot.state.pa.us
2013 Transportation Engineering Safety ConferenceDecember 13, 2013
Corridor Modernization
www.dot.state.pa.us
• Introduction to Corridor Modernization (CM)• Goals, Objectives, Strategies, Tactics (GOST)• Performance Metrics Program• Roadway Tiering• CM and the Planning Process• Next Steps
Agenda
www.dot.state.pa.us
Introduction to CMRegional Operations Plans
2005 to 2007
www.dot.state.pa.us
Prioritize
Plan
DeployMeasure
Evaluate
Accountability & Transparency
Roadway Tiers
Goals & Objectives
Performance Metrics & Data Requirements
Strategies & Solutions
Update Regional Operations Plans (ROPs)
Adjust
Update
Introduction to CMIntegration into the Planning Process
www.dot.state.pa.us
Introduction to CMCauses of Congestion
PennDOT Business Areas
• Traffic Signals• Program Center• Incident/Emergency
Management• Work Zones• Winter Services• TMC Operations• Traveler Information
National Congestion Perspective
www.dot.state.pa.us
Goal 1
Objectives
Strategies
Tactics
GOST StructurePerformance-Driven, Outcome-Based Program
Met
rics
CM Mission
Met
rics
Met
rics
Goal 3
Objectives
Strategies
Tactics
Goal 2
Objectives
Strategies
Tactics
Congestion Management and Operations
www.dot.state.pa.us
Goal 1: Mitigate Recurring Congestion» Bottlenecks» Poor Signal Timing
Goal 2: Maintain Mobility During Planned Events» Work Zones» Special Events / Other
Goal 3: Minimize the Traffic Impact of Unplanned Events» Traffic Incidents» Inclement Weather
GOST StructureGoals
www.dot.state.pa.us
GOST StructureProgram Overview
www.dot.state.pa.us
GOST StructureProgram versus Business Areas
Corridor ModernizationProgram Structure
Congestion & Operations Business Areas
www.dot.state.pa.us
GOST StructureProgram versus Business Areas
Corridor ModernizationProgram Structure
Congestion & Operations Business Areas
• Mission• Goals• Objectives• High-Level Metrics
• Strategies• Tactics• Business-Level Metrics
www.dot.state.pa.us
Moving people and goods from point A to point B as efficiently and safely as
possible
Mission
Mitigate recurring congestion
Goal 1
Optimize the use of traffic signals
Outcome Objective 1
Traffic Signals
Contributing Business Area
Evaluate and adjust, if needed, traffic signal
sequencing, phasing, and timing
Business Strategy
Policy to conduct evaluations every three
years (Tier 2A)
Tactic
CM
Pro
gra
mB
usi
nes
s A
reas
GOST StructureExampleAct
ivity
-Bas
edO
utco
me-
Bas
ed
www.dot.state.pa.us
Moving people and goods from point A to point B as efficiently and safely as
possible
Mission
Mitigate recurring congestion
Goal 1
Optimize the use of traffic signals
Outcome Objective 1
Traffic Signals
Contributing Business Area
Evaluate and adjust, if needed, traffic signal
sequencing, phasing, and timing
Business Strategy
Policy to conduct evaluations every three
years (Tier 2A)
Tactic
CM
Pro
gra
mB
usi
nes
s A
reas
User Delay CostExcess CO2 Emissions
Wasted Fuel
Intersection LOSSegment V/SF
Travel Time Index
% of Traffic Signals Adjusted on Tier 2A
Corridors
Performance Metrics Program Metrics Application
Act
ivity
-Bas
edO
utco
me-
Bas
ed
www.dot.state.pa.us
Performance Metrics ProgramMetrics Suite
Draft Outcome-Based Performance Metrics
www.dot.state.pa.us
Performance Metrics ProgramMetrics Suite
Draft Program-Level Metrics
• User Delay Costs• Rear-End Crashes• Emissions• Wasted Fuel
• Impact Factor• Travel Time Index• Planning Time Index• Buffer Time
www.dot.state.pa.us
20 mins25 mins
40 mins
05
1015202530354045
Free-Flow Travel Time Average Travel Time Planning Travel Time
Trav
el T
ime
(Min
ute
s)
Morning Peak Period
Travel Time Based Performance Metrics
95% of the time it takes this long
50% of the time it takes this long
It takes this long with no
delay
Performance Metrics Program Travel Time Story
www.dot.state.pa.us
I-76 (Schuylkill Expressway): January 2013 – June 2013
≈ 24 MILES≈ 24 MILES
Performance Metrics ProgramTravel Time Reliability Example
www.dot.state.pa.us
No Delay (26 mins)
No Delay (26 mins)
No Delay (26 mins)
Recurring Delay (+12 mins)
Recurring Delay (+12 mins)
Non-Recurring Delay
(+46 mins)
0102030405060708090
Free-Flow Travel Time Average Travel Time Planning Travel Time
Trav
el T
ime
(Min
ute
s)
5 PM – 6 PM
Outbound I-76 (Jan ‘13 – June ‘13)
Buffer Time
Performance Metrics ProgramTravel Time Reliability Example
www.dot.state.pa.us
Bu
ffer
Tim
e
Performance Metrics ProgramTravel Time Reliability Example
www.dot.state.pa.us
Roadway TieringConcept
Bucket B
Bucket A
• Subdivides the transportation network into groups with similar characteristics and operational need
• Helps define management and operational “expectations” • Creates consistent across the state
www.dot.state.pa.us
Business Plan Network Road Type Corridor Modernization Network
BPN 2: NHS Non-Interstate
BPN 1: Interstate
LimitedAccess (NHS)
1A: AADT ≥ 75,000
1B: 50,000 ≤ AADT < 75,000
1C: AADT < 50,000
Non-LimitedAccess(NHS)
2A: AADT ≥ 25,000
2B: 10,000 ≤ AADT < 25,000
2C: AADT < 10,000
BPN 3: Non-NHS,
AADT ≥ 2,000Non-NHS
3A: AADT ≥ 2,000
BPN 4: Non-NHS,
AADT< 2,0003B: AADT < 2,000
Roadway TieringBPN vs CM
www.dot.state.pa.us
Roadway TieringBPN vs CM
Centerline Miles of CM Tier per BPN
BPN # 1A 1B 1C 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B TOTAL % of TOTAL
1 430 534 1769 0 0 0 0 0 2733 6.2 %2 172 290 1200 1139 2644 1726 0 0 7171 16.4 %3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13067 0 13067 29.9 %4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20769 20769 47.5 %
TOTAL 602 824 2969 1139 2644 1726 13067 20769 43740% of TOTAL 1.4 % 1.9 % 6.8 % 2.6 % 6.0 % 3.9% 29.9 % 47.5 % 100 %
Limite
d Access (N
HS), AA
DT ≥ 75,000
Limite
d Access (N
HS), 50
,000
≤ AAD
T < 75
,000
Limite
d Access (N
HS), AA
DT < 50,000
Non
‐Lim
ited Access (N
HS), AA
DT ≥ 25,000
Non
‐Lim
ited Access (N
HS), 10
,000
≤ AAD
T < 25
,000
Non
‐Lim
ited Access (N
on‐NHS
), AA
DT ≥ 2,000
Non
‐Lim
ited Access (N
on‐NHS
), AA
DT < 2,000
www.dot.state.pa.us
Road Type Tier Criteria
LimitedAccess(NHS)
1A AADT > 75,000
1B AADT between 50,000 and 75,000
1C AADT < 50,000
Non-LimitedAccess(NHS)
2A AADT > 25,000
2B AADT between 10,000 and 25,000
2C AADT < 10,000
Non-NHS3A AADT > 2,000
3B AADT < 2,000
Roadway TieringCorridor Modernization Tiering
www.dot.state.pa.us
CM and the Planning ProcessProgram Structure
Program Development
Program Management
ProgramDirection
Program Oversight
Executive Steering
Committee
Program Governance Committee
Project Execution Management Team (PEMT)
Integration & Implementation Working Group
Data & Metrics Working Group
Planning & Deployment
Working Group
www.dot.state.pa.us
CM and the Planning ProcessPlanning & Deployment Working Group
Executive Steering
Committee
Program Governance Committee
Project Execution
Management Team (PEMT)
Planning & Deployment
Working Group
PurposeTo ensure that the development of CM is reflective of the needs of Pennsylvania’s Planning Partners and to integrate CM into the planning and programming process so as to be an integral tool for regional Transportation Management and Operations
Key Tasks• Determine the most effective approach to integrate CM into
the planning process
• Provide perspective on Federal and State reporting/funding requirements
• Provide direction for the development of regional TM&O mobility reports
• Review applicable documents/deliverables
• Communicate CM progress
www.dot.state.pa.us
CM and the Planning ProcessData & Metrics Working Group
Executive Steering
Committee
Program Governance Committee
Project Execution
Management Team (PEMT)
Data & Metrics Working Group
PurposeTo evaluate, select, and apply outcome and activity-based performance metrics that compliment all levels of the CM GOST structure and to determine the data requirements of the chosen metrics
Key Tasks• Finalize outcome-based performance metrics
• Evaluate activity-based performance metrics as they are developed by each respective business area
• Determine performance metric thresholds as they relate to the highway tiering structure of CM
• Determine data requirements
• Ensure compliance with MAP-21 requirements
• Review applicable documents/deliverables
• Communicate CM progress
www.dot.state.pa.us
Next Steps
• Establish Planning and Metric Working Groups• Conduct meetings w/ Districts and Planning
Partners to finalize tiers• Complete CM phase 1 by July 2014• Integrate CM into other business practices as an
additional “decision lens”
www.dot.state.pa.us
CM Contact Information / Questions?
Doug Tomlinson, P.E. – CM Team LeaderChief, Traffic OperationsPennDOT Bureau of Maintenance and Operations717.787.3657, [email protected]
Todd Trautz, P.E.Traffic Consultant, Traffic Signal and Operational AnalysisPennDOT Bureau of Maintenance and Operations717.254.0544, [email protected]
John FarnolyTraffic Consultant, Traffic Signal and Operational AnalysisPennDOT Bureau of Maintenance and Operations856.982.9183, [email protected]