2012 urban futures survey presentation: mayors' council april 25. 2014

14

Click here to load reader

Upload: placespeak

Post on 09-May-2015

194 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation on the 2012 Urban Futures Survey made to the Mayor's Council

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Mayors’ Council on Regional Transportation April 29, 2014

2012 Urban Futures Survey:

What kind of transportation do we want

and how do we want to pay for it?

www.urbanfuturessurvey.com

Ken Cameron, FCIP, RPP

[email protected]

Jacint Simon, Urban Studies Masters Candidate, SFU

[email protected]

Page 2: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Definition of Terms

“PlaceSpeak”

Vancouver-based social enterprise - Ken Cameron is a director and

investor

An online, interactive consultation platform that allows proponents

(municipalities, utilities, developers) to sponsor consultation topics and

receive feedback from citizens who participate voluntarily at no cost

“Urban Futures Survey” A comprehensive survey of public attitudes in Greater Vancouver developed by the late

Dr. Walter Hardwick.

Conducted in 1973, 1990 and 2012.

2012 survey was a research project of PlaceSpeak conducted with a grant from the Real

Estate Foundation of B.C., the Cities of North Vancouver and Surrey, TransLink and

Vancity

Page 3: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Ranking Challenges

Challenges 2012 1990 1973 Change

1990-2012

Provision of health care 1 3 9 +2

Traffic congestion 2 7 6 +5

Homelessness 3 NOT ASKED NOT ASKED NA

Increasing housing supply 4 8 8 +4

Air pollution from industry 5 1 1 -4

Water pollution from industry 6 2 2 -4

Air pollution from cars 7 4 3 -3

Page 4: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

“Rank, in order of preference, the issues that you

personally feel most urgently require government action.”

Transportation 30%

Housing affordability 27%

Preservation of green spaces 12%

Job creation 8%

K-12 education 7%

Loss of rental housing stock 5%

Rising property taxes 5%

Changing appearance of neighbourhoods 2%

In-migration from outside the Metro Vancouver area 2%

More recreational facilities 1%

Page 5: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Traffic congestion and commuting experience Net Agreement = total agreement - total disagreement

-40 -20 0 20 40 60

Vancouver

Surrey, White Rock

Burnaby, New West

Richmond, Delta

Port Moody, Coquitlam

North Shore

Langley

Maple Ridge, Pitt…

“I frequently experience severe traffic congestion.”

0 20 40 60 80

Vancouver

Surrey, White Rock

Burnaby, New West

Richmond, Delta

Port Moody, Coquitlam

North Shore

Langley

Maple Ridge, Pitt…

“Getting to work is no particular problem for

me.”

Page 6: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Ranking Policy Issues (11 total)

The residents of the region do not support the idea of easing

congestion by building more roads.

Issues 2012 1990 1973

Change

1990-

2012

Expanding the public transit system 1 5 2 +4

Making more efficient use of present

transportation 2 3 3 +1

Promoting comprehensive community planning 3 6 5 +3

Preserving the natural environment 4 1 1 -3

Improving highway transportation 9 9 10 0

Page 7: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

“Both public transit and highways will be

essential to Metro Vancouver in the future.”

Net Agreement = total agreement - total disagreement

40 50 60 70 80 90

Vancouver

Surrey, White Rock

Burnaby, New West

Richmond, Delta

Port Moody, Coquitlam

North Shore

Langley

Maple Ridge, Pitt…

Regional Differences

40 50 60 70 80 90

18 to 24

25 to 34

35 to 44

45 to 54

55 to 64

65 to 74

Over 75

Generational Differences

Page 8: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

“The private motor vehicle is

essential to our sense of freedom.”

Net Agreement = total agreement - total disagreement

-40 -20 0 20 40 60

Vancouver

Surrey, White Rock

Burnaby, New West

Richmond, Delta

Port Moody, Coquitlam

North Shore

Langley

Maple Ridge, Pitt…

Regional Differences

-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60

18 to 24

25 to 34

35 to 44

45 to 54

55 to 64

65 to 74

Over 75

Generational Differences

Page 9: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Transportation Preferences - 1990

● Prepared to pay more for transit

● Preference for transit over roads

● User pay principle preferred

● All taxation methods rejected

● General taxation methods were strongly rejected

Page 10: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

2012 - User pay principle supported;

property tax strongly rejected

25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

Property Tax

Gasoline Tax

Transit Fares

Vehicle Licensing Fees

Vehicle Sales Tax

Road or Bridge Tolls

Parking Fees

Transit Funding Options in Metro Vancouver (Percent of support for each funding option)

Page 11: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Summary

Transportation (ie. transit) is the

top concern

Public receptive to user pay;

opposed to general taxation,

especially property tax

Key will be the “value

proposition:” “what will I get and

how much will it cost me?”

Page 12: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Sponsored by

Page 13: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Mayors’ Council on Regional Transportation April 29, 2014

2012 Urban Futures Survey:

What kind of transportation do we want

and how do we want to pay for it?

www.urbanfuturessurvey.com

Ken Cameron, FCIP, RPP

[email protected]

Jacint Simon, Urban Studies Masters Candidate, SFU

[email protected]

Page 14: 2012 Urban Futures Survey Presentation: Mayors' Council April 25. 2014

Survey Characteristics

• 1407 respondents representing 8 sub-regions or 22 municipalities.

• The margin of error is +/- 3.1 at the 95% significance level.

• The survey data was reweighted by gender distribution and

geographical location.

• Angus McAllister of McAllister Opinion Research compiled the

survey data. Ian McKinnon of Pacific Issues Partners, and Chair,

National Statistics Council reviewed the Technical Report.

• 82% of respondents voted in 2011 Municipal

Elections