2012 jan parking study

8/13/2019 2012 Jan Parking Study

1/34

LEVEL 1

PARKING DECK

FEASIBILITY STUDY

&

PARKING PROGRAM PLAN

VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE, NY

FINAL REPORT

January 10, 2012


2/34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction .. 1.

1.1 Introduction 1.1.2 Purpose of Study 1.

1.3 Study Area 1.

1.4 Field Studies 1.1.5 Community and Stakeholder Input 2.

1.6 Acknowledgements 2.

2.0 Parking Space Supply ... 3.

2.1 Municipal Parking Supply 3.

2.2 On-Street Parking 3.

2.3 Off-Street Parking 3.2.4 Total Municipal Supply Study Area 5.

3.0 Parking Studies . 6.

3.1 Parking Space Occupancy 6.

3.2 Parking Durations Along Main Street 8.

3.3 Parking Study Conditions 9.

4.0 Proposed CBD Redevelopment .... 10.

4.1 Parking Demand Model Swezey's Block Redevelopment 10.4.2 Parking Impacts - Swezey's Redevelopment Site 10.

4.3 Parking Supply & Demand Models 11.

4.4 Latent Parking Demand 12.

5.0 Parking Improvement Strategies ... 13.

5.1 Operational Strategies 13.

5.2 Physical Strategies 16.

6.0 Parking Deck Options 19.

6.1 Site Selection 19.6.2 Service Areas 19.

4-site Service Area Illustrations 20.

6.3 Site Comparison / Pros and Cons 21.

Continued


3/34

7.0 Parking Program Plan... 22.

7.1 A Tiered Approach 22.

TABLE 1 Parking Improvement Strategies 23.

7.2 Recommendations 24.

LIST OF APPENDIXES

APPENDIX A Parking Study Area Municipal Parking Supply

APPENDIX B Occupancy Count Key Map

APPENDIX C Occupancy Count Summary

APPENDIX D-1 Parking Demand Model Saturday Condition

APPENDIX D-2 Parking Demand Model Weekday Condition

APPENDIX E-1 Parking Supply & Demand Model / Saturday Condition

APPENDIX E-2 Parking Supply & Demand Model / Weekday Condition


4/34

1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 IntroductionThe Patchogue Village Business Improvement District (PVBID) has engaged Level GAssociates, parking consultants, for the purpose of preparing a Level 1 parking deckfeasibility study. A Level 1 feasibility study is not as detailed as a feasibility studyneeded for bond financing but will provide a basic understanding of local parkingconditions and will identify practical parking choices moving forward.

1.2 Purpose of StudyThe purpose of this study is to:

Examine current parking conditions; Prepare recommendations designed to offset parking space deficiencies or

irregular parking patterns; Identify and evaluate potential sites for parking deck development in the central

business district (CBD); Prepare a parking program plan linking study findings with physical and / or

operational changes to the current parking system; Prepare cost estimates and a report summarizing our findings and conclusions.

1.3 Study AreaParking studies were generally limited the CBD that is roughly defined by Lake and OakStreets on the north, Church and Terry Streets on the south, Rider Avenue on the east,and West Avenue on the west.

Appendix A is a map of the study area showing the municipal parking supply and certainlandmarks in the CBD. As indicated in Appendix A, the study area is roughly dividedinto four quadrants centered on the intersection of Main Street and North Ocean Avenueand defined by Main Street (Montauk Highway) in the east west direction and North /South Ocean Avenue in the north south direction.

1.4 Field StudiesFor the purposes of this report, we conducted a series of field studies including but notlimited to: an inventory of the municipal parking supply in the study area; occupancycounts of all municipal parking facilities between noon and 10PM on Thursday 21 July2011 and Saturday 23 July 2011; spot occupancy counts on Thursday 11 August 2011,and; parking duration recordings conducted along Main Street on Thursday 21 July 2011.


5/34

2

It should be noted that during our field studies the Patchogue Theatre was running thefollowing scheduled events:

July 21 Monty Pythons Spamalot Shows at 2:00PM & 8:00PMJuly 23 Monty Pythons Spamalot Shows at 3:00PM & 8:30PM

August 11 No Events Scheduled

The selection of primary study dates that coincided with Patchogue Theatre show dateswas done so at the request of the PVBID. The purpose of conducting spot counts on adark theatre date was done to compare parking volumes between dark dates and showdates. The selection of summertime study dates was also done so at the request of thePVBID reflecting their assertion that that typical peak conditions in downtown Patchogueare likely to occur in the summer season.

1.5 Community and Stakeholder Input

A draft version of this report was submitted on October 24, 2011 and presented inPowerpoint format to:

the PVBID and its membership on November 8, 2011; the Patchogue Village Board (public invited) on November 14, 2011; and the Patchogue Village Planning Board on December 1, 2011.

On December 6, we reconvened with the PVBID to discuss feedback from the public andstakeholders and final report preparation.

1.6 Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Mr. Thomas Ford, Mr. Dennis Smith, Mr. Joel Peck, and theremainder of the PVBID for providing input, feedback, and background information thatwas essential to the preparation of this report.


6/34

3

2.0 PARKING SPACE SUPPLY2.1 Municipal Parking Supply

As of August 2011, the municipal parking space supply in the study area consisted of1,733 parking spaces located in parking lots and on the streets of the CBD study area.Parking is free of charge but certain regulations and time restrictions have been institutedover the years to encourage fair and orderly parking patterns in the downtown area.

2.2 On-Street ParkingThe on-street parking supply consists of 318 parking spaces composed as follows:

Two Hour Limit 191No Time Limit 100

15 Minute Time Limit 15Handicap Parking 5Loading Zones 530 Minute Limit 2

Total On-Street 318

As indicated, most on-street parking spaces in the CBD are two-hour limit spaces and areintended for use by downtown shoppers and visitors. Also, about one-half of all the on-street spaces are located on Main Street. There are 156 on-street spaces on Main Streetbetween West Avenue and Rider Avenue. Main Street includes 2 hour limit, 15 minute

limit, handicap, and loading zone spaces.

The on-street supply includes 17 fifteen minute and thirty minute limit spaces. Thesespaces are usually established near post offices and popular take-out food destinationswhere very short parking visits are common. No time limit parking areas are for use byany parking category and are sometimes utilized by downtown residents and employees.No time limit spaces can be found on South Street, Railroad Avenue, Maple Avenue,Church Street, and Terry Street (across from the new Art Space Building).

2.3 Off-Street ParkingThe off-street parking supply consists of 1,415 parking spaces composed as follows:

No Time Limit 996Two Hour Limit 310Handicap Parking 7230 Minute Time Limit 2215 Minute Limit 15

Total Off-Street 1,415


7/34

4

As indicated, most off-street parking spaces in the CBD are no time limit spaces andmany of these are used by downtown employees as well as shoppers and visitors whoprefer not to be bound by a two hour time limit.

The following chart summarizes the off-street parking supply on a lot by lot basis:

As indicated, there are 12 public parking lots ranging in size from 36 to 213 parkingspaces. Parking lots are located in each quadrant of the study area and are generallysituated behind businesses and commercial establishments along the Main Street andOcean Avenue corridors. Please refer to Appendix A for lot numbers and locations.

Time limits in the various parking lots have been established over the years in response tothe prevailing parking demand in the vicinity of each lot. In addition to time limits, someparking lots contain specially marked spaces where parking is prohibited between thehours of 4AM and 10AM, a restriction intended to keep downtown employees fromutilizing parking spaces intended for downtown shoppers and visitors. These parkingstalls are marked with red paint. In general, parking spaces in Patchogue municipal lotsare readily discerned by the color of paint used to mark the stall:

White Paint Short term parking; 2 hours or lessRed Paint 2 Hour Limit; No parking 4AM to 10AMYellow Paint No Time Limit; No RestrictionsBlue Paint Handicap


8/34

5

It should be noted that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) onlyrecommends white or blue paint for parking space markings. The MUTCD is apublication of the United States Federal Highway Administrations and is the recognizedsource for traffic control standards in the State of New York.

2.4

Total Municipal Parking Supply

The following chart is a breakdown of all municipal parking spaces in the Patchogueparking study area:

On-Street Off-Street % ofParking Parking Totals Total

No Time Limit 100 996 1,096 63.3%Two Hour Limit 191 310 501 28.9Handicap Parking 5 72 77 4.415 Minute Time Limit 15 15 30 1.7

30 Minute Limit 2 22 24 1.4Loading Zones 5 (Note 1) 5 0.3 .

Total On-Street 318 1,415 1,733 100.0%

Note 1 There are a number of loading areas, dumpster areas, and easements located throughout the off-

street parking supply that are not quantified in this analysis.


9/34

6

3.0 PARKING STUDIES

3.1 Parking Space Occupancy

The number of cars parked in municipal parking spaces and other selected parking areaswere counted at 12 noon, 2PM, 4PM, 6PM, 8PM, and 10PM on Thursday July 21 andSaturday July 23, 2011. There were matinee and evening performances of the playSpamalot running at the Patchogue Theatre on both of these count dates. In order togauge downtown parking space occupancy on a typical non-theatre day, we alsoconducted spot occupancy counts on Thursday 11 August 2011.

Appendix B shows the individual parking facilities that were counted during our fieldstudies and Appendix C is a summary of the results of those counts.

In downtown areas, it is generally considered that a parking facility can only be expectedto operate at 90% of capacity due to the constant in-flow and out-flow of automobiles andfrom a planning perspective 90% occupancy is a significant threshold. Parking areas thatare observed to be parked at or above the 90% threshold are considered full and clearlyrepresent the highest demand parking zones.

During our studies, the highest recorded occupancy in all study area public parkingspaces occurred at 2PM on Thursday July 21. At this time, 1,170 cars were parked in1,733 spaces an overall occupancy rate of 67.5%. The parking facilities that wereparked in excess of 90% at this Thursday 2PM peak are highlighted in orange on thefollowing illustration:

Facilities in Excess of 90% at Study Peak (Thursday @ 2PM)


10/34

7

Peak parking occupancies recorded on each of the study dates were as follows:

7/21 2PM Theatre Weekday 67.5%8/18 1PM Non-Theatre Weekday 54.4%7/21 4PM Theatre Saturday 43.8%

In CBD parking studies in suburban centers similar to Patchogue it is common to findSaturday occupancy rates that are significantly lower than weekday study dates. This isbecause Monday through Friday offices and businesses in the CBD are closed.

The following illustrations indicate CBD parking facilities occupied in excess of 90% ona non-theatre weekday (below), and; parking facilities occupied in excess of 90% at anytime during the study (top of page 8).

Parking Facilities in Excess of 90% on Non-Theatre Weekday


11/34

8

As derived from the previous three illustrations, the areas of downtown Patchogue withthe highest parking demand are: Main Street; the Northeast Quadrant and the SoutheastQuadrant.

3.2 Parking Durations Along Main Street

The parking time limit along Main Street is two hours maximum, but there are some

spaces with shorter time limits, such as 15 minute limit spaces in front of the Post Office.Parking spaces with time limits of two hours or less are considered short term parkingand are generally intended for downtown shoppers and visitors.

The continued turnover of short term spaces is considered a key component of a healthydowntown parking program. Short term spaces that are occupied beyond the posted timelimit by overtime parkers can severely reduce parking volume and availability often inthe most convenient parking areas.

Consider a block side with 10 two hour limit parking spaces. In theory, this block sideshould be able to accommodate a minimum of 40 parking visits between 9AM and 5PM

(4 turns per space x 10 spaces = 40 parking visits). In practice, the number of parkingvisits can be much higher as many parking durations will be one hour or less.

However, if only three of the ten spaces are occupied by overtime parkers, eachoccupying his space for six hours, the effective number of parking visits is minimallyreduced from 40 to 34, a reduction of at least 15%.

Parking Facilities in Excess of 90% at Any Time During Study


12/34

9

We measured the parking durations of cars parked in 2 hour limit spaces along MainStreet on Thursday July 21 between the hours of 12 noon and 6PM. After 6PM the 2hour parking limit is no longer in effect. The results were as follows:

North Side of Main Street: 17.0% of all cars parked longer than 2 hours

South Side of Main Street: 24.4% of all cars parked longer than 2 hours

Overall, it is calculated that 21.5% of all cars parking on Main Street park for longer than2 hours a rate of 1 in 5.

3.3 Parking Study Conditions

Weather- Parking studies should be conducted during periods of time when weatherconditions will neither affect nor interrupt the normal flow of automobile traffic. For thisreason parking studies should not be conducted during periods of inclement weather.Weather conditions during our field studies were as follows:

Low Temp High Temp Precipitation

July 21, 2011 77.0 82.0 0.00July 23, 2011 84.0 93.9 0.00August 11, 2011 66.9 81.0 0.00

As indicated, there was no precipitation and temperatures were typical of the summerseason. The temperature on Saturday 7/23 was in the low to mid 90s for most of theafternoon but it is not uncommon to encounter temperatures in the 90s on Long Island inthe month of July and the study data is therefore representative of typical conditions.

Theatre Event The Patchogue Theatre runs shows and events throughout the year, somemore heavily attended than others. During our studies attendance at the Spamalotshows was about 2/3rds of capacity and peaked at about 72% during the Saturdayevening performance. It is our understanding that this level of attendance is typical for aPatchogue Theatre show.


13/34

10

4.0 PROPOSED CBD REDEVELOPMENT4.1 Parking Demand Model Swezeys Block RedevelopmentWe prepared shared parking demand models for the Swezeys Block Redevelopmentusing the following building program provided by the PVBID:

240 Rental Townhouse Units;51 Apartment Rental Units;41,100 SF Grade Level Retail;18,000 SF Offices (31 West Main Street);5,000 SF Restaurant (31 West Main Street)

Alternate models were prepared to reflect a Saturday versus Weekday condition. We

have assumed that the Townhouse units will have 1.0 reserved parking spaces per unit aswe understand this is part of the developers program. According to the models, peakparking demand and peak demand times are estimated to be:

Saturday Peak 561 car demand @ 8PM Weekday Peak 537 car demand @ 2PM

In addition to the new redevelopment uses, the above parking demand estimates includecars that are currently utilizing the 174 space municipal lot that will be displaced by theredevelopment. Copies of the Swezeys Block Redevelopment parking demand modelsare provided in Appendix D.

4.2 Parking Impacts - Swezeys Redevelopment Site

As indicated in 4.1 above, parking demand in the Swezeys redevelopment block isexpected to be in the 537 to 561 space range after completion of the building program. Itis important to note that this demand includes cars currently parking in the existingmunicipal lot within the redevelopment block and patronizing nearby establishments suchas the Brick House restaurant and Bank of America.

If all the estimated parking demand were to be accommodated on the redevelopmentblock, the resulting on-site supply would have to be in the 537 to 561 space range. Wehave heard reports that the redevelopment parking supply is expected to be 492 parkingspaces. This suggests a potential redevelopment parking shortfall of 45 to 69 spacesduring the weekday and Saturday peak conditions, respectively.


14/34

11

4.3 Parking Supply & Demand Models

By their very nature, redevelopment projects occur in areas of towns that are strugglingand underutilized and they tend to be efficient because there is existing infrastructure inplace to help support the project, including but not limited to roads, utilities, and parking.

We have been involved in a number of successful and award winning redevelopmentprojects, including the much heralded Epsteins redevelopment project in Morristown, NJ,and they all share a common theme. the local government has helped to facilitate theredevelopment process by recognizing a shared parking concept and / or assisting in theplanning and development of a practical and efficient parking program. Part of thisefficiency comes from crediting a portion of typically vacant public parking to theredevelopment parking supply formula.

We have identified four public parkingareas that are within a very short walking

distance of the Swezeys Blockredevelopment that are excellentcandidates to act in this capacity (insetright).

These parking areas are: the 38 spacemunicipal lot that connects the Firehouseparking lot to N. Ocean Avenue; thesouthernmost row of 25 parking spaces inthe Firehouse parking lot; 15 parkingspaces in the north portion of RailroadAvenue; and 85 spaces in thenorthernmost portion of the Church Streetlot.

As a result of the occupancy countsperformed as part of this study, we areable to accurately estimate the number oftypically available parking spaces in thesefour parking areas during various times ofthe day and night for both weekday andSaturday conditions. In addition, becausethese counts were conducted on days with theatre performances, the CBD peak conditionis factored in.

The following table is a summary of estimated parking supply and demand for theSwezeys redevelopment block using the building program described in 4.1, new parkingspaces accompanying the redevelopment, and available spaces in the four public parkingareas illustrated above.


15/34

12

Weekday Peak (2PM) Saturday Peak (8PM)

Redevelopment Spaces1 492 492Available Spaces in 4 Areas 78 105

Projected Parking Supply 570 597

Projected Parking Demand (537) (561)

Surplus or (Deficit) 33 36

Recognizing that the above parking demand projections include a 10% safety factor, weestimate that the redevelopment program as described herein is feasible. A more detailedaccounting of the parking supply and demand models can be found in Appendix E.

4.4 Latent Parking Demand

We understand that there is about 45,000 square feet of vacant floor space on the westside of the Patchogue CBD the same side of the CBD as the redevelopment project. Ifand when these floor areas become occupied there will be some amount of new parkingdemand associated with the new businesses.

This latent parking demand may surface in the future and place stress on the localparking supply. However, until the volume and nature of the new businesses are knownit is very difficult to forecast what the actual future impacts will be. It is also difficult toforecast changes that will take place in the areas surrounding these new establishments.For example, if a business is now a restaurant and is replaced by a jewelry store or a bank,the resulting change in the local parking patterns will need to be factored in.

This report includes a range of recommendations designed to improve the Patchogueparking experience. The first tier of recommendations are low cost to implement, butmay yield significant parking improvements. We estimate that these Tier 1recommendations will have a material impact on parking conditions and may very wellserve the Patchogue CBD quite well for a number of years in the near term.

This report also includes Tier 2 (parking lot expansion) solutions to be considered ifparking problems resist after the Tier 1 recommendations are implemented and Tier 3(multi level parking) parking programs that, we recommend, should only be consideredafter the redevelopment program has been built and occupied for at least 18 months.

This measured approach assures that village resources and capital are expendedefficiently and on an as needed basis.

1293 residential reserved spaces + 108 on-site public spaces + 65 space public lot on Lake Street + 26 newon-street spaces (source: Tritec)


16/34

13

5.0 PARKING IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIESThis section identifies a number of strategies that can be employed to improve the

Patchogue parking experience. Operational strategies are simple and inexpensive toimplement but can have a profound positive impact on parking conditions. Physicalstrategies can range from simple and inexpensive to involved and costly.

5.1 Operational Strategies

a. Create more long term parking in Lot 3

Lots 3 and 4 are popular destinations for long term parkers and we suspect that manydowntown employees park in these lots while they are at work. During time periodswhen Lots 3 and 4 were experiencing 90% occupancy rates in the no time limit parking

sections, the two hour limit spaces in Lot 3 were largely unused. There are 74 two hourlimit spaces in Lot 3 (behind Ralphs) and during our studies the highest observedoccupancy in these spaceswas 38 cars parked (51.3%)and the average occupancywas 26 cars parked (35.1%).The inset illustration showsa row of 12 two hour limitspaces in Lot 3 that can beconverted to no timelimit spaces to relievepressure on the employeeparking supply in this area.

b. Reduce the parking time limit on Main Street from 2 hours to 60 or 90

minutes

As discussed in section 3.2 our studies have indicated that 1 out of every 5 cars parkingon Main Street parks in excess of the posted 2 hour time limit. This is one of the reasonswhy parking problems persist along this active corridor. But, in many active businessdistricts, time limits for the most convenient on-street parking spaces are 60 or 90minutes. This makes convenient parking available to the maximum number of shoppersand visitors.

There are about 140 two hour time limit spaces along Main Street and the time limit is ineffect for the 9 hour period between 9AM and 6PM. In theory, this arrangement willallow for a minimum of 630 Main Street parking visits: 140 spaces x 9 hours 2.0 hours= 630 parking visits.


17/34

14

By reducing the time limit from two hours to 60 minutes, the minimum number of MainStreet parking visits will double from 630 to 1260: 140 spaces x 9 hours 1.0 hours =1,260 parking visits. By reducing the time limit from two hours to 90 minutes, theminimum number of Main Street parking visits will increase by over 200 parking visitsper day from 630 to 840: 140 spaces x 9 hours 1.5 hours = 840 parking visits.

c.1 Create Turnover on Main Street - Enforce Parking Time Limits

During our three days of parking studies, we only noted one parking ticket issued to aparked vehicle on Main Street, even though it was determined that 1 out of every 5 carswas parked illegally.

A municipality must walk a fine line when it comes to enforcement too muchenforcement can promote bitter feelings from parkers and the village may be perceived asbeing overly antagonistic. This situation usually does not sit well with downtownmerchants either. Not enough enforcement can lead to parking abuses, especially

rampant overtime parking violators.

A reasonable enforcement routine should be based on a minimum number of checks perday a minimum of three or four checks per day for short-term (2 hour or less limit)parking areas, and a minimum of one or two checks per day for permit parking areas, ifapplicable.

There are several methods to enforce overtime parking for on-street parking, but the mostcommon method employed is chalking tires. Higher technology methods such asentering license plate numbers and wheel positions into handheld computers or vehiclemounted license plate recognition systems may also be employed, although the latter canbe quite costly to implement.

Because of the high importance of creating parking turnover along Main Street, it isrecommended that chalking of tires and subsequent chalk checks be conducted at leastthree times per day along Main Street and South Ocean Avenue north of Church Street.

c.2 Create Turnover on Main Street Install Parking Meters

As discussed above, the enforcement of parking time limits along Main Street and othershort term (two hours or less) parking areas is a key component of creating turnover andimproving parking conditions in downtown Patchogue. However, this will involve astepped-up program of chalking tires (or recording license plate numbers and wheelpositions) and issuing tickets to all violators. Such programs can sometimes be perceivedas unfriendly.

An alternate method of creating turnover and reducing the need for an aggressiveenforcement program is to use parking meters to control the coveted spaces along MainStreet, South Ocean Avenue, and perhaps other areas. The meter will add an element ofself-enforcement as parkers will note their parking expiration time at the meter. New


18/34

15

meter technologies such as pay by cell phone and credit card options are makingmetered parking more user friendly. Pay by cell phone customers can even be sentautomatic text messages when their meter time is about to expire and can extend theirmeter time by an appropriate response to the text message.

d. Add some 30 minute limit spaces in Lot 2 near the Library

Many library visitors only require a short parking visit because customers are theresimply to drop off an expiring book, pick up a specific item, or perform a reference check.For this reason we recommend that about 6 or 8 parking spaces in Lot 2 adjacent to therear entrance of the library be converted to 30 minute limit parking.

e. Develop Parking Lot Designations

In many towns, municipal parking areas are given a series of names or alpha / numericdesignations such as Elm Street Lot,

Lot 4, or Lot D. This assists motoristsin locating parking lots and allows localbusinesses to direct their customers to themost convenient parking areas.

After a naming pattern has been selectedsignage should be installed at each lotindicating its name and the parkingregulations within. An example of such asign is shown in the inset illustration.

f. Prepare and Print a Parking in Patchogue Pamphlet

After the lots have been named and signed, it is recommended that a simple pamphlet beprepared and printed that describes the various on-street and off-street public parkingareas in Patchogue. The pamphlet should include the names, locations, regulations, timelimits, and fees charged for each parking facility, if appropriate. A simple map of theCBD with the parking areas outlined should also be included in the pamphlet.

The pamphlets should be made available to all public facilities, institutions, and localbusinesses to hand out to customers. They can also be mailed to local residents.

g. Prepare and Implement a Wayfinding Sign Program

The inset illustration shows afamily of wayfinding signsrecently installed in the townof Newton, NJ. These signswere installed to improveawareness and circulation


19/34

16

and have been well received by local residents and businesses. The total cost of theprogram, which included the installation of over 30 signs, was less than $15,000. Asimilar program in Patchogue would be a natural accompaniment to items (e) and (f)above.

5.2 Physical Strategies

a.1 Modify access area between Lots 2 and 3 Version 1

The access area between Lots 2 and 3 organizes traffic flow between Terry Street, Lot 2,and Lot 3. It functions well but its generous dimensions and a planting island displace alot of potential parking spaces. The following sketch indicates that a net gain of about 40spaces can be realized by removing the planting island between the two lots.

There are some dumpsters located on the east side of the planting island that would haveto be relocated as part of this concept. These dumpsters should be placed in a dumpsterenclosure similar to the one in the Church Street lot.

a.2 Modify access area between Lots 2 and 3 Version 2

An alternate version of the above plan that does not displace as much of the existinglandscaping is shown at the top of the following page. This alternate plan would still

yield an additional 25 spaces.


20/34

17

b. New Spaces North Side of Terry Street

We understand that the village is exploring the installation of about 20 new parallelparking spaces along the north side of Terry Street in the area just south of Lots 3 and 4.This is certainly a worthwhile strategy because these spaces will be inexpensive todevelop (paint striping and signage) and will be located in a relatively high demandparking area.

c. Purchase Land to Expand Lot 8 (behind pork store)

At one ofourmeetingswith thePVBID itwasmentionedthat oneproperty

adjacent toLot 8(behind thepork store)may beavailable for purchase. Adding public parking in this area may be worthwhile because ofits proximity to high parking demand areas and the redevelopment block. The insetsketch indicates that a maximum of about 42 additional spaces can be added by


21/34

18

purchasing this property and using it to expand the adjacent municipal parking lot.According to zillow.com the value of the subject property, 15 Oak Street, is about$366,000.

d. Purchase Land to Expand Lot 1 (Church Street Lot)

We have been asked to estimate how many parking spaces could be gained by purchasingthe old bank drive through and adjacent houses along Church Street to expand theexisting 213 space Church Street lot. The following sketch indicates that the existing 213space parking lot can be expanded to a capacity of about 358, a gain of 145 spaces.

Using prices listed on zillow.com it is estimated that the total value of the five propertiesneeded to accomplish this parking lot expansion is about $1.1 million.


22/34

19

6.0 PARKING DECK OPTIONS6.1 Site Selection

There are a number of factors that need to be considered when selecting a parking garagesite. For example: the site should have good access for vehicles and pedestrians; the siteshould be large enough to fit an efficient parking structure; the site should not be overlyencumbered with utilities or poor soils; and so forth.

One of the most important factors in locating a parking deck is that it should beproximate to areas where high parking demand exists.

We reviewed the study area to determine potential sites for future parking deckdevelopment. Based on site ownership, site dimensions, and proximity to high parking

demand areas, we considered the following four sites:

Lot 1 Municipal parking lot behind JRs Lot 2 Municipal parking lot behind Library Lot 6 Municipal parking lot behind Congregational Church Lot 7 Municipal parking lot behind Blums

6.2 Service Areas

The service area of a parking deck is defined as the 85thpercentile distance that users ofthe deck will walk after parking their cars. In suburban centers like Patchogue, thisdistance is estimated to be about 725 feet. That is, 85% of the parkers using a parkingdeck in Patchogue will walk 725 feet or less to reach their destination.

Figure 1, next page, is an illustration showing the four selected sites and the estimatedareas of Patchogue that each will serve. In developing the estimated service area limitswe employed the 725 foot walking distance and used actual customer walking routestaking into consideration the use of cut through walkways, sidewalks and crosswalks.

As shown on Figure 1, the site that most closely overlays the high parking demandareas identified on the 90% occupancy maps on pages 6 and 7 and whose service areaencompasses all four CBD quadrants, a long stretch of Main Street, the Patchogue theatre,and most of the redevelopment block is Lot 7, behind Blums.


23/34

20


24/34

21

6.3 Site Comparison / Pros and Cons

The following is a basic comparison of the four parking deck sites:

6.3.a Lot 1 Municipal parking lot behind JRs

Pros: Good size, good vehicular and pedestrian accessCons: Service area does not include the Patchogue Theatre

Potential number of cars per level: 120Net parking gain for a 2-supported level garage: 205

6.3.b Lot 2 Municipal parking lot behind Library

Pros: Good size, good vehicular and pedestrian access, recent local investmentsCons: Service area barely reaches redevelopment block, relocate overhead wires


6.3.c Lot 6 Municipal parking lot behind Congregational Church

Pros: Good size, open site, proximity to Patchogue TheatreCons: Service area does not include southwest quadrant and Main Street west of Ocean

Avenue; least convenient alley access to Main Street


6.3.d Lot 7 Municipal parking lot behind Blums

Pros: Service area encompasses all four CBD quadrants, a long stretch of Main Street,the Patchogue theatre, and most of the redevelopment block

Cons: Smallest site, relocate overhead wires


6.4 Parking Garage Costs

According to O&S Associates, parking garage designers, parking garage constructioncosts in the northeast region were in the $15,000 to $17,000 per space range in 2011.Adding 5% to the high end of the 2011 range, a safe construction budget for 2012 wouldbe about $17,850 per space. Design and construction supervision costs would addanother 10% bringing the total all in estimate to about $19,635 per space.


25/34

22

7.0 PARKING PROGRAM PLAN7.1 A Tiered Approach

Sections 5 and 6 of this report contain operational strategies, parking expansion strategies,and parking deck construction strategies that are designed to improve parking conditionsin downtown Patchogue. Because parking problems were found to be very localized(with vacant spaces always available within a reasonable walking distance) and notwidespread in nature we believe that operational strategies and low cost parkingexpansion strategies will be sufficient and will significantly improve current parkingconditions in downtown Patchogue.

Table 1, next page, lists 17 parking improvement strategies that have been explored inthis report. We have classified these strategies into three tiers:

Tier 1 Low cost management, 20 new spaces, Less thanoperational, and physical 325 new visits $30,000improvements. per day, improved

signage, utilization,recognition andcirculation

Tier 2 Parking lot 212 to 227 AboutExpansions new spaces $2.5 million

Tier 3 Parking deck 165 to 240 $5.1 toConstruction new spaces $7.5 million

Table 1 provides greater detail of the 17 strategies and also describes the rationale,impact, estimated cost, and cost per net space gained of each strategy.

Recommendations and implementation guidelines for the tiered parking program areincluded on page 24.


26/34

TABLE1

PATCHOGUECBDP

ARKING

STUDY

PARKING

IMPROVEMENTSTRATEGIES

December2011

COSTPER

REF

L

OCATION

DESCRIPT

ION

RATIONALE

IMPACT

COST

NETSPACE

GAINED

5.1.a

Lot3

Convert(12)2HRlimitspaces

ImprovedBalance

12

Spaces

$300

$25

BehindRalph's

to"NoTimeLimit"Spaces

andUtilization

IncreaseLongTermsupply

5.1.b

MainStre

et/

Reducetimelimitfrom

2HR

IncreasesTurnover

21

0ParkingVisits

$1,2

00

N/A

SouthOceanAvenue

to90minute

5.1.c1

MainStre

et/

SteppedUpEnforcem

entof

IncreasesTurnover

50

ParkingVisits

$0

N/A

SouthOceanAvenue

TimeLimits

o

or

5.1.c2

MainStre

et/

InstallParkingMeters

IncreasesTurnover

50

ParkingVisits

$44,0

00/Yr

N/A

SouthOceanAvenue

$1

50,0

00peryearIncome

for5Years(Lease)

5.1.d

Lot2

Convert(6)2HRlimit

spaces

ImprovedBalance

65

ParkingVisits

$200

N/A

BehindLibrary

to30minutelimitspaces

andUtilization

5.2.b

NorthSideof

AddParallelParking

CapacityImprovement

20

spaces

$1,5

00

$75

TerryStre

et

5.1.e

AllParkin

gLots

Nameeachlotandinstall

Recognition

Qualitative

$5,0

00

N/A

entrancesignage

5.1.f

ParkingS

ystem

Prepareanddistribute

ImprovedAwareness

Qualitative

$2,5

00

N/A

InformationalPamphlet

andUtilization

5.1.g

Townwide

WayfindingSignSystem

ImprovedAwareness

Qualitative

$15,0

00

N/A

andCirculation

5.2.a1

AreaBetw

eenLot2&3

Re-construct/re-strip

efor

CapacityImprovement

40

spaces

$150,0

00

$3,7

50

add'lparking-MaximumPlan

o

or

or

5.2.a2

AreaBetw

eenLot2&3

Re-construct/re-strip

efor

CapacityImprovement

25

spaces

$190,0

00

$7,6

00

add'lparking-Landsc

apePlan

5.2.c

Lot8

Purchase15OakStre

et

LandBanking

42

spaces

$541,0

00

$12,8

80

BehindPorkStore

andexpandlot

CapacityImprovement

5.2.d

Lot1

Purchase5properties

LandBanking

14

5spaces

$1,7

50,00

0

$12,0

70

ChurchStreetLot

andexpandlot

CapacityImprovement

6.3.a

Lot1

ConstructParkingDeck

CapacityImprovement

20

5spaces(netgain)

$6,4

00,00

0

$31,2

20

ChurchStreetLot

(3Levels-2supporte

d)

6.3.b

Lot2


CapacityImprovement

24

0spaces(netgain)

$7,5

00,00

0

$31,2

50

BehindLibray

(3Levels-2supporte

d)

6.3.c

Lot6-Be

hind


CapacityImprovement

20

5spaces(netgain)

$6,4

00,00

0

$31,2

20

Congrega

tionalChurch

(3Levels-2supporte

d)

6.3.d

Lot7


CapacityImprovement

16

5spaces(netgain)

$5,1

00,00

0

$30,9

10

BehindBlums

(3Levels-2supporte

d)

T I E R 1 T I E R 2 T I E R 3


27/34

24

7.2 Recommendations

It is recommended that Tier 1parking improvements be implemented in 2012. Webelieve these changes will have a material positive impact on parking conditions and will

serve the Patchogue CBD quite well for a number of years in the near term.

It is recommended that Tier 2parking lot expansions be considered on a case-by-casebasis if parking problems persist after the Tier 1 recommendations have beenimplemented. If the village has the financial capacity, it may be a worthwhile strategy tobegin land banking some of the properties identified in Sections 5.2.c and 5.2.d so theymay be in a better position to implement Tier 2 parking expansions if and when the timecomes.

It is recommended that Tier 3parking deck construction options be considered on a case-by-case basis if parking problems persist after the Tier 1 recommendations have been

implemented AND the Swezeys Block redevelopment has been built and occupied for atleast 18 months.


28/34

OFS

PAN

LO

T

CAT

1

213

2

167

3

172

4

59

5

109

6

191

7

97

8

36

9

74

10

40

11

83

12

174

KEY

=ON-STREETP

ARKING-2HOURLIMIT

=ON-STREETP

ARKING-NOTIMELIMIT

=MUNICIPALPARKINGLOTWITHDESIGNATIONNUMBER

=AREAOFMUNICIPALLOTWITH2HOURLIMITPARKING

FIRE

DEPT

MEDOFFICES

THEATRE

POST

OFFICE

COURT

HOUSE

BROOKHAVEN

MEDICAL

LIBRARY

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

1

2

3

4

5

NORTHWEST

QUADRANT

NO

RTHEAST

Q

UADRANT

SOUTHWEST

QUADRANT

SOUTHEAST

QUADRANT

X


29/34

1

14

9

9

17a

16

21

44

26

8

39

15

2

5

10

6

17b

20

22

52

27

5

40

107

3

15

11

5

18

38

23

15

28

17

41

8

4

12

12

4

19

84

24

176

29

12

42

2

5

5

13

3

20

174

25

5

30

14

43

8

6

17

14

8

31

8

44

98

7

12

15

44

32

2

45

85

8

5

16

30

33

16

46

17

34

10

47

43

35

13

48

80

36

12

49

44

37

18

50

98

38

14

51

74

52

46

57

102

53

13

58

10

54

N/A

59

35

5 5

9 8

6 0

FIRE

DEPT

MED

OFFICES

THEATRE

POST

OFFICE

COURT

HOUSE

BROOKHAVEN

MEDICAL

1

2

3

4

5

6 7

89

10

111

2

13

14

15

16

17

a

b

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

59

58

25

26

29

30

34

36

38

39

37

35

33

32

31

27

28

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

56

55

54

57


30/34

THURSDAY

Practical 8/18/2011

REF # Spaces Capacity 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 8:00 PM 10:00 PM 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 8:00 PM 10:00 PM 1:00 PM

1 14 12.6 12 13 11 9 13 10 6 10 10 11 12 8 13

2 5 4.5 3 2 1 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2

3 15 13.5 15 14 14 9 15 4 6 6 6 6 3 4 13

4 12 10.8 7 8 6 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 8

5 5 4.5 4 3 4 4 2 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 2

6 17 15.3 5 6 5 3 8 9 4 7 8 9 7 9 8

7 12 10.8 1 3 3 3 1 3 0 1 3 1 0 3 5

8 5 4.5 2 1 1 3 1 3 3 2 1 2 1 3 2

9 9 8.1 3 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8

10 6 5.4 2 3 2 0 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 4 9

11 5 4.5 2 2 1 5 4 4 2 5 2 4 3 3 2

12 4 3.6 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0

13 3 2.7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

14 8 7.2 4 7 6 3 9 4 1 0 2 2 2 1 3

15 44 39.6 16 27 23 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14

16 30 27.0 19 26 20 14 7 0 8 7 4 2 2 1 21

17a 16 14.4 11 12 12 8 12 3 14 13 13 10 7 7 11

17b 20 18.0 9 13 9 5 13 3 15 11 10 8 10 5 11

18 38 34.2 12 20 11 15 19 10 7 9 12 9 15 13 14

19 84 75.6 19 19 15 12 10 8 8 8 11 9 11 6 18

20 174 156.6 62 71 64 65 73 97 57 68 47 57 76 64 8321 44 39.6 32 44 43 41 44 29 33 44 44 39 43 41 37

22 52 46.8 51 52 52 47 53 46 30 47 49 38 51 51 50

23 15 13.5 4 8 16 7 11 8 4 7 7 7 11 11 4

24 176 158.4 45 172 172 65 176 157 16 28 164 56 142 143 38

25 5 4.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

26 8 7.2 5 8 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 2 2 3 6

27 5 4.5 3 4 3 1 1 0 4 2 0 1 0 2 2

28 17 15.3 13 10 12 4 9 2 11 9 10 6 6 2 11

29 12 10.8 12 7 6 3 0 0 8 9 12 7 6 1 11

30 14 12.6 13 14 13 13 14 13 15 10 12 13 15 13 14

31 8 7.2 3 8 6 5 7 3 7 6 8 5 7 8 7

32 2 1.8 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 0

33 16 14.4 15 16 14 13 16 14 14 16 14 12 16 16 13

34 10 9.0 11 11 11 10 10 11 11 9 11 13 12 10 1035 13 11.7 9 13 10 12 10 9 11 13 12 10 12 13 13

36 12 10.8 13 9 6 8 12 11 7 11 9 8 12 10 11

37 18 16.2 16 15 13 14 15 15 13 16 12 12 18 13 16

38 14 12.6 0 0 3 3 9 8 0 1 0 3 3 14 2

39 15 13.5 6 5 5 7 14 15 3 5 4 2 9 9 2

40 107 96.3 23 18 12 3 4 3 4 8 4 4 4 4 15

41 8 7.2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0

42 2 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

43 8 7.2 2 3 3 3 5 7 3 4 4 6 5 6 0

44 98 88.2 81 88 74 51 42 21 45 52 46 28 40 25 81

45 85 76.5 54 59 49 58 40 20 33 30 36 39 43 29 72

46 17 15.3 17 14 10 2 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 0 13

47 43 38.7 38 38 40 31 28 2 33 32 28 11 10 7 40

48 80 72.0 68 78 76 58 45 10 73 68 60 26 12 9 76

49 44 39.6 34 43 40 40 39 15 39 42 38 20 19 15 40

50 98 88.2 77 78 78 48 52 30 56 52 36 26 27 28 88

51 74 66.6 36 22 27 26 25 16 31 38 27 24 25 18 26

52 46 41.4 42 45 30 6 7 1 22 23 15 6 2 1 43

53 13 11.7 12 9 11 4 6 2 9 8 8 8 9 0 13

54 45 40.5 8 5 7 1 8 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 7

55 98 88.2 35 26 42 85 55 22 41 30 26 20 18 8 38

56 11 9.9 5 3 2 10 7 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 1

57 102 91.8 28 28 29 21 24 15 25 34 29 21 26 15 41

58 10 9.0 6 8 4 7 2 1 5 5 6 6 6 6 3

59 35 31.5 0 21 23 2 22 23 0 0 3 0 0 30 0

2006 1805.4 1027 1237 1160 885 1015 705 757 824 880 619 769 699 1091

= 90% Occupancy Or Higher

THURSDAY - JULY 21, 2011 SATURDAY - JULY 23, 2011

APPENDIX C - PARKING OCCUPANCY COUNT SUMMARY

VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE, NY


31/34

APPENDIXD-1

PARKINGDEMANDM

ODEL

SWEZEY'SBLOCKRE

DEVELOPMENTPROGR

AM

RunDate:December28,

2011

SATURDAYCONDITION

Peak

Factor

Unit

Source

6am

7am

8am

9am

10am

11am

12n

1p

m

2pm

3pm

4pm

5pm

6pm

7pm

8pm

9pm

10pm

11pm

12m

BackgroundDemand

7-23-11Counts

10

12

14

20

27

35

39

45

53

42

30

38

43

52

59

55

50

48

46

5,000SFRestaurant

16.3

/1000SF

ITE

0

0

0

3

5

14

29

37

33

28

45

55

82

82

82

24

7

7

5

41,100SFGradeLevelRetail

2.97

/1000SF

ITE

2

16

33

74

92

110

122

12

1

120

107

83

68

89

84

79

54

35

24

0

18,000SFOffices

0.50

/1000SF

LevelG

0

1

5

8

9

9

8

8

9

8

7

5

2

1

0

0

0

0

0

240TownhouseUnits-Reserved

1.00

/Unit

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

24

0

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240TownhouseRentalUnits

0.23

/Unit

Note2

54

52

49

33

39

37

36

35

35

38

40

43

44

46

46

48

49

52

54

51ApartmentRentalUnits

1.05

/Unit

Note2

52

50

48

32

38

36

35

34

34

37

39

42

43

44

45

47

48

51

52

Adjustment:RemovalofTaxisfrom"

BackgroundDemand"

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-1

0

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

Credit:InternalTrips/FootTraffic

Note3

0

-3

-7

-16

-19

-25

-30

-3

2

-31

-27

-26

-25

-34

-33

-32

-15

-8

-6

-1

SafetyFactor(10%)

LGA

35

36

37

39

42

45

47

48

48

46

45

46

50

51

51

44

41

41

39

TOTALS

384

395

410

424

463

491

517

52

8

533

511

494

502

549

557

561

486

452

447

426

PEAK

Note1-CarscurrentlyparkingwithintheredevelopmentfootprintestimatedtobegeneratedbyBrickhouse,BOA,orotherusestoremain.

Note2-UsedfactorsfromI

TEandreduce

dby15%toaccountforproximitytorail/transit.

Note3-Used20%o

f"Restaurant"and"R

etail"DemandTotals

LEVELGASSOCIATES,LLC

SeeNote1

1.0RESERVEDSPACEPERTOWNH

OUSE

/ALLOTHERSPACESSHARED


32/34

APPENDIXD-2

PARKINGDEMANDMODEL

SWEZEY'SBLOCKR

EDEVELOPMENTPROGRAM

RunDate:December28,

2011

WEEKDAYCONDITION

Peak

Factor

Unit

Source

6am

7am

8am

9am

10am

11am

12n

1pm

2pm

3pm

4pm

5pm

6pm

7pm

8p

m

9pm

10pm

11pm

12m

BackgroundDemand

7-21-11Count

10

13

20

30

41

48

49

50

53

48

46

49

51

54

5

7

70

83

78

68

5,000SFRestaurant

13.3

/1000SF

ITE

0

0

0

1

4

11

24

31

27

23

37

45

67

67

6

7

33

17

8

3

41,100SFGradeLevelRetail

2.65

/1000SF

ITE

2

11

42

60

82

98

107

109

107

103

96

93

95

98

9

5

76

41

22

0

18,000SFOfficeSpace

2.84

/1000SF

ITE

1

8

31

47

51

51

45

47

49

48

39

26

13

5

3

2

1

0

0

240TownhouseUnits-Reserved

1.00

perUnit

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240

240TownhouseRentalUnits-Shared

0.23

perUnit

Note2

53

46

41

40

38

36

34

33

33

33

36

39

41

43

4

7

50

51

53

54

51ApartmentRentalUnits

1.05

perUnit

Note2

51

44

40

39

36

35

33

32

32

32

35

37

40

42

4

6

49

50

51

52

Adjustment:RemovalofTaxisfrom"

BackgroundDemand"

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

-10

Credit:InternalTrips/FootTraffic

Note3

0

-2

-8

-13

-20

-31

-45

-52

-49

-43

-56

-63

-85

-86

-85

-48

-25

-12

-3

SafetyFactor(10%)

LevelG

36

36

41

46

49

52

53

54

54

53

53

53

55

55

5

5

52

48

45

42

TOTALS

384

386

438

479

511

530

531

534

537

527

516

508

506

508

515

514

497

476

447

PEAK

Note1-Carscurrentlyparkingwithinth

eredevelopmentfootprintestimatedtobegeneratedbyBrickhouse,BOA,orotherusestoremain

.

Note2-UsedfactorsfromI

TEandredu

cedby15%toaccountforproximitytorail/transit.

Note3-Used20%o

f"Restaurant"and

"Retail"DemandTotals

LE

VELGA

SSOCIATES,

LLC

SeeNote1

1.0RESERVEDSPACEPERRESIDENTIALUNIT/ALLOTHERSPACESSHARED


33/34

APPENDIXE-1

PARKINGSUPPLY&

DEMANDMODEL

SWEZEY'SBLOCKREDEVELOPMENTPROGRAM

RunDate:December28,

2011

SATURDAYCONDITION

Peak

DEMAND

Factor

Unit

Source

6am

7am

8am

9am

10am

11am

12n

1pm

2pm

3pm

4pm

5pm

6pm

7pm

8pm

9pm

10pm11pm

12m

DEMANDTOTALSFROMTABLED-1

384

395

410

424

463

491

517

528

533

511

494

502

549

557

56

1

486

452

447

426

SUPPLY

PublicLotonRedevelopmentSite(108Spaces)

Tritec

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

10

8

108

108

108

108

NewPublicLotOnLakeStreet(65Spaces)

Tritec

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

NewOn-StreetSpacesCreatedbyRedevelopment(26Spaces)

Tritec

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

On-siteResidentialReservedSpaces(293Spaces)

Tritec

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

29

3

293

293

293

293

PublicParkingAvailableWithin1Block

N.OceanLot(38spaces)

7-23-11Counts

30

30

30

30

30

30

31

30

29

27

26

27

29

26

23

24

25

25

25

NorthernmostPortionofChurchSt.Lo

t(85spaces)

7-23-11Counts

50

50

50

50

50

50

52

53

55

52

49

47

46

44

42

49

56

55

55

SouthernmostRowofFireHouseLot(

25spaces)

7-23-11Counts

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

NorthPortionofRailroadAvenue(15s

paces)

7-23-11Counts

10

10

10

10

10

10

12

12

13

12

12

13

15

15

15

13

11

11

11

SUPPLYTOTALS

607

607

607

607

607

607

612

612

614

608

604

604

607

602

59

7

603

609

608

608

SURPLUSOR(DEFICIT)

223

212

197

183

144

116

95

84

81

97

110

102

58

45

36

117

157

161

182

WorstCaseCondition

1.0RESERVEDSPACEPERRESID

ENTIALUNIT/ALLOTHERSPACESSHARED


34/34

PPENDIXE-2

ARKINGSUPPLY&DEMANDMODEL

WEZEY'SBLOCKREDEVELOPMENTPROGR

AM

nDate:December28,

2011

WEEKDAYCONDITION

Peak

MAND

Factor

Unit

Source

6am

7am

8am

9am

10am

11am

12n

1pm

2pm

3pm

4pm

5pm

6pm

7pm

8pm

9pm

10pm

11pm

12m

MANDTOTALSFROMTABLED-2

384

386

438

479

511

530

531

534

537

527

516

508

506

508

515

514

497

476

447

PPLY

licLotonRedevelopmentSite(108Spaces)

Tritec

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

108

wPublicLotOnLakeStreet(65Spaces)

Tritec

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

65

wOn-StreetSpacesCreatedbyRe

development(26Spaces)

Tritec

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

26

siteResidentialReservedSpaces(293Spaces)

Tritec

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

293

licParkingAvailableWithin1Block

OceanLot(38spaces)

7-21-11Counts

25

25

25

25

25

25

26

22

18

22

27

25

23

21

19

24

28

25

25

thernmostPortionofChurchSt.Lo

t(85spaces)

7-21-11Counts

30

30

30

30

30

30

31

28

26

31

36

31

27

36

45

55

65

65

65

thernmostRowofFireHouseLot(25spaces)

7-21-11Counts

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

25

thPortionofRailroadAvenue(15spaces)

7-21-11Counts

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

9

10

10

12

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

PPLYTOTALS

582

582

582

582

582

582

584

577

570

580

590

585

582

589

596

611

625

622

622

RPLUSOR(DEFICIT)

198

196

144

103

71

52

53

43

33

53

74

77

76

81

81

97

128

146

175

WorstCaseCondition

1.0RESERVEDSPACEPERRESIDENTIALUNIT/ALLOTHERSPACESSHARED

2012 jan parking study

Documents