2012 development charges update technical report development... · intensification areas in...

74
Prepared by: AECOM 105 Commerce Valley Drive West, Floor 7 905 886 7022 tel Markham, ON, Canada L3T 7W3 9 905 886 9494 fax www.aecom.com Project Number: 60198085 Date: August 25, 2011 Water Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

Upload: leanh

Post on 30-May-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Prepared by: AECOM 105 Commerce Valley Drive West, Floor 7 905 886 7022 tel Markham, ON, Canada L3T 7W3 9 905 886 9494 fax www.aecom.com Project Number:

60198085 Date:

August 25, 2011

Water

Region of Halton

2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 i

Distribution List

# of Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name

50 1 Halton Region

Revision Log Revision # Revised By Date Issue / Revision Description

1 CH January 31, 2011 First Draft

2 DM April 15, 2011 Second Draft

3 CH July 8, 2011 Third Draft

4 CH July 22, 2011 Fourth Draft

5 MZ/CH July 29, 2011 Final Draft Report

6 CH August 25, 2011 Final Report

AECOM Signatures

Report Prepared By:

Chris Hamel P.Eng, Associate Vice

President

Report Reviewed By:

Mark Zamojc E.I.T. Municipal Engineer in

Training

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011

Table of Contents

page

1.  Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 

1.1  Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2  Study Area ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3  System Overview .................................................................................................................................. 4 

1.3.1  Water Supply and Distribution System .................................................................................... 4 1.3.2  Wastewater Collection and Treatment System ....................................................................... 4 

2.  Population and Employment Projections .................................................................................... 5 

2.1  BPE Data June 2011 ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.2  Service Area Projections ...................................................................................................................... 6 

3.  Related Policy and Criteria ............................................................................................................ 7 

3.1  Residential Servicing ............................................................................................................................ 7 3.2  Employment Servicing .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.3  System Security .................................................................................................................................... 7 3.4  Intensification ........................................................................................................................................ 7 3.5  Water Demand and Wastewater Flow Design Criteria ......................................................................... 9 

3.5.1  Water Demand Criteria .......................................................................................................... 10 3.5.2  Wastewater Flow Criteria ...................................................................................................... 11 

3.6  Costing Criteria ................................................................................................................................... 12 3.7  Development Charges Criteria ........................................................................................................... 18 

3.7.1  DC By-Law Structure ............................................................................................................. 18 3.7.2  Existing Capacity ................................................................................................................... 19 3.7.3  Benefit to Existing (Non - Growth) ......................................................................................... 19 3.7.4  DC Eligible Infrastructure ....................................................................................................... 19 3.7.5  Oversizing .............................................................................................................................. 20 3.7.6  Residential/Non Residential .................................................................................................. 21 3.7.7  Project Timing ........................................................................................................................ 22 

4.  Water Servicing Requirements ................................................................................................... 23 

4.1  Water Service Areas ........................................................................................................................... 23 4.2  Water Demand Projections ................................................................................................................. 23 4.3  Water Servicing Flow Schematics ...................................................................................................... 23 4.4  Water Storage Requirements ............................................................................................................. 23 

5.  Water Capital Program ................................................................................................................ 39 

6.  Wastewater Servicing Requirements ......................................................................................... 47 

6.1  Wastewater Service Areas ................................................................................................................. 47 6.2  Wastewater Flow Projections ............................................................................................................. 47 

7.  Wastewater Capital Program ...................................................................................................... 50 

APPENDIX A Design Criteria Review Executive Summary APPENDIX B Benefit to Existing and Oversizing Calculations APPENDIX C Local Service Guidelines

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011

List of Figures

Figure 1.  Sustainable Halton Study Area ................................................................................................................... 2 

Figure 2.  Study Area Environmental Features ........................................................................................................... 3 

Figure 3.  Intensification Areas in Burlington and Oakville .......................................................................................... 8 

Figure 4.  Intensification Areas in Milton, Acton and Georgetown .............................................................................. 8 

Figure 5.  Water Pressure Zones .............................................................................................................................. 24 

Figure 6.  Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2011 ..................................................................................................... 31 

Figure 7.  Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2016 ..................................................................................................... 32 

Figure 8.  Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2021 ..................................................................................................... 33 

Figure 9.  Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2026 ..................................................................................................... 34 

Figure 10.  Water Servicing Flow Schematic 2031 ..................................................................................................... 35 

Figure 11.  Halton Preferred Water Servicing Strategy ............................................................................................... 46 

Figure 12.  Halton Wastewater Drainage Areas .......................................................................................................... 48 

Figure 13.  Halton Preferred Wastewater Servicing Strategy ..................................................................................... 56 

List of Tables

Table 1.  Halton Region Population Projections to 2031 ........................................................................................... 5 

Table 2.  Halton Region Employment Projections to 2031 ........................................................................................ 5 

Table 3.  Service Area Population Projections to 2031.............................................................................................. 6 

Table 4.  Service Area Employment Projections to 2031 .......................................................................................... 6 

Table 5.  Sustainable Halton Water Demand Criteria .............................................................................................. 10 

Table 6.  Sustainable Halton Peaking Factors ......................................................................................................... 10 

Table 7.  Design Criteria for System Components ................................................................................................... 11 

Table 8.  Sustainable Halton Wastewater Flow Criteria ........................................................................................... 11 

Table 9.  Sustainable Halton Wastewater Peak Wastewater Flow Design Criteria ................................................. 12 

Table 10.  Watermain Benchmark Unit Costs ............................................................................................................ 13 

Table 11.  Sewer Benchmark Costs ........................................................................................................................... 14 

Table 12.  Forcemain Benchmark Unit Costs ............................................................................................................ 16 

Table 13.  Trenchless Installation Unit Costs ............................................................................................................. 16 

Table 14.  Water Project Splits for the DC By-Law Categories ................................................................................. 21 

Table 15.  Wastewater Project Splits for the DC By-Law Categories ........................................................................ 22 

Table 16.  Water Demand Projections ....................................................................................................................... 25 

Table 17.  Water Storage Requirements ................................................................................................................... 36 

Table 18.  Water Capital Program .............................................................................................................................. 43 

Table 19.  Wastewater Flow Projections .................................................................................................................... 49 

Table 20.  Wastewater Capital Program .................................................................................................................... 53 

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 1

1. Overview

1.1 Background

As part of the 2012 Water and Wastewater Development Charges Update, this Technical Report presents the basis for the development of the costs and implementation timing of water and wastewater projects required to service growth in Halton Region between 2012 and 2031. The project costs and implementation timing set out in this report are based on the work undertaken as part of the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan. The Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan has been completed to provide a Region-wide review, evaluation and development of water and wastewater servicing strategies for all urban service areas based on a 2031 planning horizon. This is a comprehensive servicing review for the Region and includes development of strategies for the South Halton systems in Burlington, Oakville, Milton and Halton Hills 401 Corridor as well as the urban systems in Georgetown and Acton. This master planning approach builds on the previous work undertaken as part of the South Halton Master Plans and Updates as well as related studies for the North Halton systems. This Master Plan is a critical component in the integrated planning process of the Sustainable Halton program and provides the framework and vision for the water and wastewater servicing needs for Halton Region to 2031.

1.2 Study Area

The Study Area for the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan encompasses the existing designated urban areas in the Town of Oakville, City of Burlington, Town of Milton and the Town of Halton Hills 401 Corridor as well as the urban areas of Acton and Georgetown (including the hamlets of Stewarttown, Norval, and Glen Williams) located within the Town of Halton Hills. The study area includes development in the existing Urban Built Boundary (Intensification) and new Greenfield development outside of the existing urban areas in Oakville, Milton and Georgetown. The Sustainable Halton Study Area is depicted in Figure 1. The Study Area land use is based on the Halton Regional Official Plan amended by ROPA 25, ROPA 38 and ROPA 39 through the Sustainable Halton growth planning exercise. Through the Sustainable Halton process, Best Planning Estimates (BPE) data for Population, Occupied Dwelling Units and Employment was developed through to year 2031. The BPE data served as the basis for the master planning exercises and was updated in June 2011 (BPE Data June 2011). Integral to the study area and Places To Grow requirements, intensification areas within the Built Boundary across the Region have been identified. The intensification areas are discussed in Section 3 and are focused in Burlington (along the Brant Street and Fairview Street corridors), Oakville (along Kerr Street, in the Trafalgar Road/South of QEW area and south of Dundas Street), Milton (within “historic” Milton) and parts of Georgetown and Acton. Although trunk level servicing of the intensification areas were part of the Sustainable Halton Master Plan, an independent study was undertaken to review the impact on local level infrastructure in these areas.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 2

Figure 1. Sustainable Halton Study Area

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 3

Key Environmental Features for the Sustainable Halton Study Area are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Study Area Environmental Features

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 4

1.3 System Overview

1.3.1 Water Supply and Distribution System

Water supply in the South Halton study area is currently and will continue to be provided by three water purification plant (WPP) facilities (Burlington, Oakville and Burloak WPPs) which treat Lake Ontario source water. The downtown core of Milton will continue to be supplied by groundwater primarily by the Kelso Well Field and WPP. Due to the gradual rise in ground elevation northerly from the shore of Lake Ontario to the lake-based service area boundary in Milton and Halton Hills 401 Corridor, separate pressure zones have been established. Each pressure zone spans an elevation difference of approximately 30 metres. Local distribution watermains are fed from larger trunk feedermains connected between the WPPs, Pumping Stations and Storage Facilities. In North Halton (Acton and Georgetown), treated water is provided by six municipal well fields, including Davidson, Fourth Line, and Prospect Park Well Fields in Acton and Cedarvale, Princess Anne and Lindsay Court Well Fields in Georgetown. Groundwater pumped from the Cedarvale Well Field is treated at the Georgetown WPP. New groundwater based servicing strategies for both Acton and Georgetown have been developed under the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan and include new Well Field, treatment and storage facilities. Due to the significant growth in Georgetown and the fact that the groundwater servicing strategies will not be sufficient to meet its demand, a future extension of the Lake Ontario based South Halton water system to Georgetown is required to service the new growth area.

1.3.2 Wastewater Collection and Treatment System

There are five large wastewater collection systems within Burlington, Oakville and Milton, each of which drain to a wastewater treatment plant. The five wastewater treatment plants are Skyway Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), Oakville Southeast WWTP, Oakville Southwest WWTP, Mid-Halton WWTP and Milton WWTP. The wastewater collection systems in Halton Region may be categorized by the treatment plants that receive and treat wastewater flows. The wastewater collection systems generally consist of smaller local gravity sewers connected to larger sub trunk and trunk sewers. The pumping stations vary in size, with some servicing very localized areas to others servicing significant drainage areas, and have firm pumping capacities ranging from approximately 3 L/s to over 1,500 L/s. The ground elevations sloping from north to south starting in the Milton and northern Burlington and Oakville areas have led to the planning and construction of gravity collection systems which ultimately outlet to Lake Ontario. In areas along the shoreline and at locations which are topographically difficult to service by gravity, wastewater pumping stations and forcemains have been constructed to connect sub-drainage areas to the gravity collection system. Wastewater, which is conveyed by the Milton collection system and treated at the Milton WWTP, is separate from the Burlington and Oakville systems and currently discharges to Sixteen Mile Creek. Wastewater collected in Acton and Georgetown are treated at the Acton WWTP and Georgetown WWTP, respectively. The Acton WWTP discharges to Black Creek, which is a sensitive cold-water fishery. The Georgetown WWTP discharges to Silver Creek which is also a sensitive receiving stream. These stream-based wastewater treatment plants that discharge into local streams are located within the Credit Valley Conservation watershed. Due to significant growth in Georgetown and limitations at the Georgetown WWTP, a future extension of the Lake Ontario based South Halton wastewater system to Georgetown to service the growth area is required.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 5

2. Population and Employment Projections

2.1 BPE Data June 2011

The planning data set is based on the Halton Region BPE Data June 2011. This data was geographically distributed by Traffic Survey Zone (TSZ) and subsequently more discretely to smaller areas identified as Small Geographic Units (SGUs) for Master Planning analyses. The BPE Data June 2011 are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. It should be noted that the BPE Data presented reflects the projections with residential Census undercount which has been identified by Halton Region Planning as approximately 4%. The BPE Data projections have been utilized with Halton Region design criteria to ensure future planning reflects actual future population. As such, the servicing strategies developed under Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan will meet the Province of Ontario Places To Grow target for Halton Region of approximately 780,000 persons and 390,000 employees by 2031. As such, in Table 1 below, the 752,537 population total in 2031 (recognizing undercount) equates to the Places to Grow target of 780,000.

Table 1. Halton Region Population Projections to 2031

Total Population

2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Oakville 165,529 174,780 197,702 221,826 234,122 246,399

Burlington 164,446 173,761 175,438 178,847 182,034 186,169

Milton 53,938 88,438 124,645 161,750 195,735 228,084

Halton Hills 54,978 56,066 57,922 61,672 77,003 91,885

TOTAL 438,891 493,045 555,707 624,094 688,895 752,537

Table 2. Halton Region Employment Projections to 2031

Employment - Employees

2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Oakville 82,089 90,969 106,485 120,796 122,578 128,359

Burlington 87,854 95,656 98,710 102,846 104,145 105,349

Milton 27,232 44,452 62,553 81,106 96,631 114,330

Halton Hills 19,228 19,856 20,744 22,936 32,356 41,962

TOTAL 216,403 250,932 288,493 327,684 355,710 390,000

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 6

2.2 Service Area Projections

The distribution of population and employment growth among the primary geographic regions of the Sustainable Halton Study Area up to year 2031 were prepared in partnership between the Halton Region and the Region’s individual Local Municipalities. The planning data was further reviewed to determine the growth within the existing Built Boundary as well as Greenfield areas. To evaluate the impact on the water and wastewater systems, it is essential to document the population and employment growth in the service areas connected to the municipal systems. The total serviced population and employment includes the Built Boundary areas, designated Greenfield growth areas as well as a small percentage of rural areas on municipal systems but not the rural areas on private systems. The service area projections are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4.

Table 3. Service Area Population Projections to 2031

Serviced Population (Persons)

2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Oakville 165,412 174,655 197,584 221,709 234,007 246,282

Burlington 160,833 170,176 171,919 175,393 178,648 182,834

Milton 48,332 82,752 118,931 155,945 189,587 221,450

Halton Hills 401 Corridor 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub-Total South Halton 374,577 427,583 488,434 553,047 602,242 650,566

Acton 10,233 10,036 9,796 10,379 12,874 13,981

Georgetown 1 37,271 38,708 41,042 44,410 57,452 71,332

Sub-Total North Halton 47,504 48,744 50,838 54,789 70,326 85,313

Total Service Area 2 422,081 476,327 539,272 607,836 672,568 735,879

Rural 16,810 16,718 16,435 16,258 16,327 16,658

Region Total 438,891 493,045 555,707 624,094 688,895 752,537

Note: 1. Georgetown serviced population includes future servicing of Hamlets

2. Projections based on serviced area only (ie: areas connected to municipal systems) and does not include rural population on private systems (BPE Data June 2011)

Table 4. Service Area Employment Projections to 2031

Serviced Employment (Employees)

2006 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Oakville 82,089 90,969 106,485 120,796 122,578 128,359

Burlington 87,455 94,990 97,952 102,033 103,315 104,508

Milton 25,684 42,792 60,777 79,276 94,723 112,251

Halton Hills 401 Corridor 1,500 1,702 2,179 3,778 11,276 19,204

Sub-Total South Halton 196,728 230,453 267,393 305,883 331,892 364,322

Acton 3,642 3,791 4,085 4,354 4,744 5,071

Georgetown 1 12,663 12,902 13,017 13,341 14,868 16,206

Sub-Total North Halton 16,305 16,693 17,102 17,695 19,612 21,277

Total Service Area 2 213,033 247,146 284,495 323,578 351,504 385,599

Rural 3,370 3,786 3,998 4,106 4,206 4,401

Region Total 216,403 250,932 288,493 327,684 355,710 390,000

Note: 1. Georgetown serviced employment includes future servicing of Hamlets

2. Projections based on serviced area only (ie: areas connected to municipal systems) and does not include rural employment on private systems (BPE Data June 2011)

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 7

3. Related Policy and Criteria

3.1 Residential Servicing

The Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan has reviewed the specific servicing needs for the existing and future residential areas. Residential servicing strategies were developed based on the overall water and wastewater policies and guidelines, Regional servicing standards and guidelines, and servicing needs calculated from planning projections and design criteria. Key considerations for residential servicing are related to providing water supply from the trunk facilities, ensuring adequate trunk facilities extend servicing to the residential areas, providing for extension of local servicing from the trunk infrastructure, allowing for system redundancy, increasing security of supply, and meeting adequate levels of service for residential servicing including pressures and fire flows. The Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan focused the analysis on the trunk facilities. As such, the trunk facilities must provide sufficient level of service to account for future extension of local servicing.

3.2 Employment Servicing

Similar to residential servicing, the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan has reviewed the specific servicing needs for the existing and future employment areas. Employment strategies and considerations are similar to those for residential servicing. Of note, the fire flow requirements in employment areas can have greater needs.

3.3 System Security

In addition to the traditional growth related needs evaluated under the Master Plan, review was undertaken of the existing systems and the ability to continue to convey flows and provide adequate level of service to support growth. Critical areas of the trunk water system were identified as requiring improved transmission capacity. The new projects addressed concerns such as isolated service areas, single feeds across significant features such as major highways, support for emergency shut down conditions, and overall capacity for future growth flows.

3.4 Intensification

Given the focus of intensification within the Built Boundary for future growth in Halton Region, as per conformity with Places To Grow, Sustainable Halton Master Plan undertook a specific analysis for the impact of intensification on the systems. This analysis investigated the impacts of intensification on the core area of the following municipalities:

Burlington Oakville Milton Georgetown Acton

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 8

These areas are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. The orange shading represents the areas where intensification will occur and areas bounded in red are the major urban centres.

Figure 3. Intensification Areas in Burlington and Oakville

Figure 4. Intensification Areas in Milton, Acton and Georgetown

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 9

Beyond typical Master Planning level analysis focusing on trunk infrastructure, the intensification analysis undertaken in Sustainable Halton was completed to a greater level of detail. In addition to referencing the BPE data, further review of the potential location of the growth within the intensification areas was undertaken to better estimate and focus growth within these areas. This approach provided a better indication of potential impact on existing watermains and sewers (local infrastructure). Using the full pipe models allowed for a capacity review of existing local infrastructure systems, and determined if upgrades would be required to maintain an expected level of service based on a higher density of residential and employment needs. As a result, the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan provides recommendations on trunk infrastructure and also the local infrastructure (distribution mains and small sewers) within the intensification areas. It should be noted that the intensification infrastructure requirements are based on best available information and depending on the actual intensification proposals, may require further review and revision.

3.5 Water Demand and Wastewater Flow Design Criteria

It has been typical practice to review the design criteria as part of the recent Master Plan updates for Halton Region. The focus of the design criteria review is to assess the residential and employment water demand consumptions and wastewater flow generations. This is common practice to ensure that the projected water and wastewater flows are accurate and reflect new trends to support decision making for the sizing and timing of future infrastructure including pipes and facilities. The approach taken under Sustainable Halton has been more intensive than in the past. Not only to ensure the projections are reasonable, but the review was considered more critical in light of perceived and/or actual changes in recent water use/wastewater generation as well as greater emphasis in categorizing future development in Greenfield areas and intensification areas within the Built Boundary. The approach to project flows under previous Master Plans was to apply the design criteria to the horizon year planning projections. This approach was reconciled against historical flows but was not necessarily influenced by historical trends. The approach moving forward is based on establishing a yearly starting point, calculated from historical flows, and projecting growth flows from this starting point forward. This approach is being implemented in the Development Control Monitoring Report as well as the Master Plan processes and will ensure continuity in projections. This approach will also better serve reconciliation through the allocation processes. An overall guiding principle for the design criteria is to ensure that flow projections are adequately predicted with an appropriate level of safety and acceptable risk. Existing and future infrastructure must have sufficient capacity to meet servicing requirements without compromising operation of the facilities or impede approved and committed growth. On this basis, for Master Planning purposes, the design criteria should reflect a total production need which includes consumption and non-revenue water use. The design criteria review involved analysis of historical plant production/treatment data, historical water consumption data, sample area water consumption data, district water metering areas (DMAs) and historical peaking factors at the plant. The review of design criteria is summarized in the technical memorandum entitled “Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Design Criteria Review – Executive Summary”, AECOM, December 2010, (Appendix A).

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 10

Based on the design criteria review and analysis, it has been recommended that the existing South Halton lake based design criteria be applied system-wide such that all new Greenfield growth service areas utilize the common criteria. Similarly, the previous groundwater based design criteria should be maintained in existing urban areas (including intensification) which rely on this water source. The design criteria review also recognized continued opportunity for decreasing water consumption and water use efficiency/conservation (achieved through water efficiency measures such as the new building code) associated with new residential growth on a go forward basis. It was determined that an overall 5% reduction in total water demands would be applied to the water projections to account for efficiency and conservation.

3.5.1 Water Demand Criteria

The water demand criteria, including peaking factors, are summarized in the following tables. Residential criteria is based on population. Employment criteria is based on employees.

Table 5. Sustainable Halton Water Demand Criteria

Average Day Water Design Criteria

Lpcd Residential 330

L/emp/d Industrial 302

Commercial 213

Institutional 74

Table 6. Sustainable Halton Peaking Factors

Water Design Criteria Max PF Peak PF

Lake Based Oakville, Burlington,

Milton, Georgetown

1.9 3

Groundwater Based Milton

1.6 Georgetown

Acton

In order to address the decreasing water consumption trends and opportunity for water conservation/efficiency moving forward, as noted above, the base water design criteria shown in Table 5 and Table 6 was not reduced. However, the total projected demands calculated using the criteria were reduced by 5%. In essence, applying a total reduction of 5% to the total projected demands provides a better estimate for future water demands on the system. This reduction may also provide opportunity to reduce the total required capacity of key infrastructure and may also allow the opportunity to defer timing of new infrastructure. For water projects, the water needs were based on the water supply requirements for the service area. The water supply requirements are based on maximum day demands (Max PF) for areas with sufficient water storage volume and peak hour demands (Peak PF) for areas without storage.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 11

Sizing of the water system components was based on the following criteria:

The watermains making up the local distribution system were sized for the greater of maximum day demands plus fire flow or peak hour demands.

The pumping facilities, feedermains and storage facilities were sized based on the maximum day

demands or peak hour demands without storage.

The water treatment plant facilities were sized based on the maximum day demands.

The water demands associated with the respective projects are determined using the best planning estimate data for residential and non-residential users and applying the design criteria.

Table 7. Design Criteria for System Components

Pumping Stations With adequate zone storage available

Maximum day flow to zone and all subsequent zones

Without adequate storage available Peak hour flow to zone and maximum day flow to all subsequent zones

Storage A - Equalization 25% of maximum day demand

B - Fire Largest expected fire in zone (based on land use)

C - Emergency Minimum of 25% of (A+B)

Total = A+B+C

Fire flow Minimum flow (residential) 5,500 L/min for 2 hours @ minimum 140 kPa (20 psi)

Minimum flow (industrial/ commercial/institutional)

15,000 L/min for 3 hours @ minimum 140 Pa (20 psi)

System pressure Normal operating conditions 280 kPa (40 psi) to 700 kPa (100 psi)

3.5.2 Wastewater Flow Criteria

The wastewater flow criteria is summarized as follows:

Table 8. Sustainable Halton Wastewater Flow Criteria

Design Criteria Average Flows

Lpcd Residential 365

L/emp/d Industrial 410

Commercial 260

Institutional 135

The 365 Lpcd residential average flow criteria includes a flow component for average level of extraneous flow allowance

(90 Lpcd). This criteria is used to estimate flows at a WWTP catchment level. A residential flow criteria of 275 Lpcd is

used for calculation of peak flows at a collection system level.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 12

Table 9. Sustainable Halton Wastewater Peak Wastewater Flow Design Criteria

Area Halton Inflow and Infiltration

Design Allowance (L/s/ha)

All existing and new wastewater treatment plant service areas (except

those identified below). 0.2861

Milton WWTP 0.24 to 1.0

Oakville Southwest WWTP 0.40 to 3.0

Skyway WWTP existing service area 0.35 to 0.65

Notes: 1. Regional design criteria

Residential flows are calculated using average dry weather flow criteria of 275 Lpcd. ICI flows are

calculated using the values contained in Table 8. Total peak flows are calculated using the total dry

weather flows peaked using the Halton standard modified Harman formula plus the extraneous flows.

For wastewater projects, the infrastructure capacity requirements within the service areas were based on the peak flows for the collection system components and based on projected average day loadings and flows for the treatment facilities. Although the plant’s physical components including tankage must accommodate the peak flows, historical convention has been to rate wastewater treatment plants at average day flows. Sizing of the wastewater system components was based on the following criteria:

The sewers and pumping facilities making up the collection system were sized for peak flows, which are calculated using the peak dry weather flows and the Halton Inflow and Infiltration Design Allowance.

The wastewater treatment plant facilities were based on the average day flow which includes the extraneous flow allowance.

The wastewater flows associated with the respective projects are determined using the best planning estimates for residential and non-residential users and applying the design criteria.

3.6 Costing Criteria

The approach to developing cost estimates for the respective projects was based on an updated approach from the previous 2008 Water and Wastewater Master Plan Update and DC process. Base construction costs were developed using a unit cost approach. These unit costs have been updated from the previous 2008 Water and Wastewater Master Plan Update and reflect current 2012 market conditions. They have been inflated using a value of 9.6% which is based on the Statistics Canada Quarterly Construction Price Statistics (Catalogue number 62-007). The update to the unit costs has considered trends in materials, labour, other market conditions and recent tendered projects within the Greater Toronto and Golden Horseshoe areas. Based on a similar approach undertaken during the previous Master Plan and Development Charges processes, the unit costs were developed for linear infrastructure including watermains, forcemains and for sewers with more shallow installations (5m depth) and maximum depth for open cut installations (10m depth). Additional trenchless installation (including tunneling) unit rates were developed. These rates are summarized in Table 10 through Table 13 .

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 13

Table 10. Watermain Benchmark Unit Costs

Nom.Pipe Outer Depth to Min Excavation Bedding Pipe Backfill Subtotal Restoration Total Unit

Size Diameter invert Trench width Volume Cost Volume Cost Cost Install Vol Cost Unit Costs Costs

(mm) (m) (m) (m) (m3) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (2012 $/m)

400 0.50 3.0 1.00 5.25 153 0.9 48 280 53 4 51 585 117 701

450 0.55 3.0 1.00 5.25 153 0.9 48 308 53 4 51 613 117 730

500 0.60 3.0 1.20 6.3 184 1.2 61 341 53 5 60 699 117 816

600 0.73 3.0 1.20 6.3 184 1.2 62 412 150 5 60 868 117 985

750 0.90 3.0 1.70 8.925 261 1.9 101 590 150 7 82 1,183 117 1,300

900 1.10 4.0 1.90 13.3 388 2.3 120 771 150 11 129 1,558 117 1,675

1050 1.26 4.0 2.06 14.42 421 2.6 136 1,028 175 12 138 1,899 117 2,016

1200 1.42 4.0 2.42 16.94 495 3.3 174 1,285 204 14 159 2,318 117 2,434

1350 1.62 4.5 2.62 20.6325 603 3.8 197 1,741 280 17 197 3,019 117 3,135

1500 1.80 4.5 2.80 22.05 644 4.2 220 2,185 321 18 209 3,579 117 3,695

1650 1.98 4.5 3.00 23.625 690 4.7 245 2,378 351 19 222 3,885 117 4,002

1800 2.15 5.0 3.15 27.5625 805 5.0 265 2,675 368 23 263 4,376 117 4,493

2100 2.45 5.0 3.50 30.625 895 6.0 314 2,892 368 25 288 4,756 117 4,873

($/m3)

COST OF EXCAVATION & DISPOSAL (OPEN CUT BANKS @ 1:1)

29

COST OF BEDDING PIPE SURROUNDING INCLUDES SUPPLY AND PLACING 53

BACKFILL TRENCH INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF NATIVE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION 12

Valve & Chamber Cost Inclusive of Purchase and Installation

Diameter Cost

(mm) ($)

400 18,819

450 18,819

500 18,819

600 18,819

750 18,819

900 48,089

1050 77,358

1200 106,628

1350 135,897

1500 165,167

1650 194,436

1800 223,706

2100 282,244

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 14

Table 11. Sewer Benchmark Costs

i) 5m Depth

Nom.Pipe Outer Depth to Excavation Granular Bedding Pipe Backfill Restoration Restoration Subtotal Unit Landscape Const. Access Total Unit

Size Diameter invert Volume Cost Volume Cost Cost Install Vol Cost Costs Allowance Allowance Costs

(mm) (m) (m) (m3) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) (m) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (2012 $/m)

375 0.52 5 5.60 164 1.0 55 81 41 4.56 53 8.38 98 491 0 0 491

450 0.58 5 5.90 172 1.1 59 103 41 4.77 56 8.45 99 530 0 0 530

525 0.655 5 6.28 183 1.2 65 124 41 5.04 59 8.53 100 572 0 0 572

600 0.755 5 6.78 198 1.4 73 175 41 5.39 63 8.60 100 650 0 0 650

675 0.88 5 8.40 245 1.9 99 257 49 6.52 76 9.68 113 839 0 0 839

750 0.97 5 8.85 258 2.0 107 339 49 6.81 80 9.75 114 947 0 0 947

825 1.055 5 9.28 271 2.2 115 394 49 7.08 83 9.83 115 1,027 0 0 1,027

900 1.14 5 9.70 283 2.4 124 472 49 7.34 86 9.90 116 1,130 0 0 1,130

975 1.23 5 10.15 296 2.5 133 544 49 7.62 89 10.98 128 1,240 0 0 1,240

1050 1.32 5 11.60 339 3.1 162 623 49 8.51 99 11.05 129 1,401 12 58 1,472

1200 1.455 5 12.28 359 3.4 178 780 49 8.89 104 11.20 131 1,601 11.6834 58.417 1,671

1350 1.67 5 13.35 390 3.9 204 958 55 9.48 111 11.35 133 1,850 11.6834 58.417 1,920

1500 1.805 5 14.03 410 4.2 220 1,171 55 9.84 115 12.50 146 2,116 11.6834 58.417 2,187

1800 2.16 5 15.80 461 5.1 266 1,694 55 10.74 125 12.80 150 2,752 11.6834 58.417 2,822

2100 2.51 5 17.55 513 6.0 314 2,255 65 11.58 135 13.10 153 3,435 11.6834 58.417 3,505

2400 2.88 5 19.40 567 7.0 368 2,991 65 12.41 145 13.40 157 4,292 11.6834 58.417 4,362

3000 3.56 5 22.80 666 9.0 474 4,592 65 13.78 161 14.00 164 6,122 11.6834 58.417 6,192

($/m3)

COST OF EXCAVATION & DISPOSAL 29

COST OF GRANULAR BEDDING PIPE SURROUNDING INCLUDES SUPPLY AND PLACING 53

RESTORATION ALLOWANCE 12

BACKFILL TRENCH INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF NATIVE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION 12

Manholes Inclusive of Purchase and Installation

Diameter Cost

(mm) ($)

1500 17,525

1800 29,209

2400 40,892

3000 52,575

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 15

ii) 10m Depth

Nom.Pipe Outer Depth to Excavation Granular Bedding Pipe Backfill Restoration Restoration Subtotal Unit Landscape Const. Access Total Unit

Size Diameter invert Volume Cost Volume Cost Cost Install Vol Cost Costs Allowance Allowance Costs

(mm) (m) (m) (m3) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (m3) ($/m) (m) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) ($/m) (2012$/m)

375 0.52 10 35.20 1,439 1.0 55 81 41 34 399 15.4 180 2,195 0 0 2,195

450 0.58 10 35.80 1,464 1.1 59 103 41 35 405 15.6 182 2,254 0 0 2,254

525 0.655 10 36.55 1,495 1.2 65 124 41 35 413 15.8 185 2,322 0 0 2,322

600 0.755 10 37.55 1,535 1.4 73 175 41 36 422 16 187 2,434 0 0 2,434

675 0.88 10 38.80 1,587 1.9 99 257 49 37 431 16.2 189 2,612 0 0 2,612

750 0.97 10 39.70 1,623 2.0 107 339 49 38 440 16.4 192 2,750 0 0 2,750

825 1.055 10 40.55 1,658 2.2 115 394 49 38 448 17 199 2,863 0 0 2,863

900 1.14 10 41.40 1,693 2.4 124 472 49 39 456 17.2 201 2,995 0 0 2,995

975 1.23 10 42.30 1,730 2.9 152 544 49 39 460 17.4 203 3,139 0 0 3,139

1050 1.32 10 43.20 1,767 3.1 162 623 49 40 469 17.6 206 3,275 12 58 3,345

1200 1.455 10 44.55 1,822 3.4 178 780 49 41 481 17.8 208 3,518 12 58 3,588

1350 1.67 10 46.70 1,910 3.9 204 958 55 43 500 17.8 208 3,834 12 58 3,905

1500 1.805 10 48.05 1,965 4.7 245 1,171 55 43 507 18 210 4,153 12 58 4,223

1800 2.16 10 51.60 2,110 5.6 295 1,694 55 46 537 18.4 215 4,906 12 58 4,976

2100 2.51 10 55.10 2,253 6.6 347 2,255 65 49 567 19.4 227 5,713 12 58 5,784

2400 2.88 10 58.80 2,404 7.7 404 2,991 65 51 597 20 234 6,696 12 58 6,766

3000 3.56 10 65.60 2,683 9.9 518 4,592 65 56 651 21.6 252 8,761 12 58 8,831

($/m3)

COST OF EXCAVATION 41

COST OF GRANULAR BEDDING PIPE SURROUNDING INCLUDES SUPPLY AND PLACING 53

RESTORATION ALLOWANCE 12

BACKFILL TRENCH INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF NATIVE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION 12

Manholes Inclusive of Purchase and Installation

Diameter Cost

(mm) ($)

1500 29,209

1800 51,407

2400 75,942

3000 100,477

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 16

Table 12. Forcemain Benchmark Unit Costs

Nom.Pipe Outer Depth to Min Excavation Bedding Pipe Backfill Subtotal Restoration Total

Size Diameter invert Trench width Volume Cost Volume Cost Cost Install Vol Cost Unit Costs

mm m m m m3 $/m m3 $/m $/m $/m m3 $/m Costs $/m (2012$/m)

150 0.17 3 0.8 2.3 $67 0.34 $18 $37 45 2 $23 $190 $117 $307

200 0.22 3 0.8 2.5 $72 0.39 $21 $61 45 2 $24 $223 $117 $340

250 0.28 3 0.9 2.6 $76 0.45 $24 $105 77 2 $26 $308 $117 $425

300 0.33 3 0.9 2.8 $81 0.50 $27 $140 77 2 $27 $351 $117 $468

350 0.39 3 1.0 3.0 $86 0.56 $30 $308 77 2 $27 $528 $117 $645

400 0.50 3 1.00 5.3 $152 0.9 $48 $331 97 4 $52 $680 $117 $797

450 0.55 3 1.00 5.3 $152 0.9 $48 $473 97 4 $52 $823 $117 $940

500 0.60 3 1.20 6.3 $183 1.2 $61 $570 97 5 $62 $973 $117 $1,090

600 0.73 3 1.70 8.9 $259 1.8 $98 $626 220 7 $85 $1,287 $117 $1,404

750 0.90 3 1.70 8.9 $259 1.9 $101 $699 250 7 $84 $1,393 $117 $1,510

900 1.10 3 1.90 10.0 $289 2.3 $121 $838 300 8 $92 $1,640 $117 $1,757

1050 1.26 3 2.06 10.8 $314 2.6 $137 $1,106 300 8 $99 $1,955 $117 $2,072

($/m3)

COST OF EXCAVATION 29

COST OF BEDDING PIPE SURROUNDING INCLUDES SUPPLY AND PLACING 53

BACKFILL TRENCH INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF NATIVE MATERIAL AND COMPACTION 12

Table 13. Trenchless Installation Unit Costs

Diameter Cost/m Diameter Cost/m

<= 350 $ 1,000 975 $ 8,696

375 $ 4,564 1050 $ 9,212

400 $ 4,736 1200 $ 10,245

450 $ 5,080 1350 $ 11,278

525 $ 5,597 1500 $ 12,311

600 $ 6,113 1650 $ 13,344

675 $ 6,630 1800 $ 14,377

750 $ 7,146 2100 $ 16,443

825 $ 7,663 2400 $ 18,510

900 $ 8,179 3000 $ 22,642

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 17

For each linear project, a review of potential additional costs was undertaken. Unique conditions such as additional rock excavation, property, natural feature crossings, tunneling (resulting from infrastructure depth or crossings), etc. were estimated separately. Also, for the vertical projects, specific preliminary cost estimates were developed to reflect current tendered construction conditions. Where available, more detailed construction cost estimates from studies or preliminary designs were utilized. Based on the information available for the major facilities, including water treatment plant expansions, wastewater treatment plant expansions, water pumping stations, wastewater pumping stations, and reservoirs, the cost estimates for these projects referenced either recent project estimates or recent tender prices within the Greater Toronto and Golden Horseshoe Area. Many of these projects had undergone recent Class EA studies or preliminary/detailed design phases and had construction estimates available. For all projects, a sub-total construction cost was established for each project based on the base unit cost and additional costs. These master planning (conceptual) level cost estimates are reflective of cost estimates which typically range between levels of +50% / -25%. To account for total project engineering costs and contingency, 35% of the construction cost was added to each project. In general, the project cost estimating process as described above can be summarized as follows: + $ generated from construction base unit costs + $ for additional unique construction requirements (crossings, others, …) = $ subtotal for construction + $ subtotal for construction * 1.35 for engineering (internal and external costs) and contingency= $ total cost for project Due to the program uniquely identified for intensification within the Built Boundary, different unit cost estimates were developed for project within the existing urban areas. These unit costs were higher than Greenfield unit costs due to:

Urban construction area impacts Utility coordination, mitigation and diversion Urban reinstatement Small project mobilization Other contingencies

The construction cost and engineering/contingency cost make up the total project costs in 2012 dollars only and do not reflect inflated costs at the time of implementation.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 18

3.7 Development Charges Criteria

3.7.1 DC By-Law Structure

The total infrastructure program developed under Sustainable Halton has been categorized to meet the DC By-Law structure as follows:

Capacity Distribution – Greenfield Distribution – Built Boundary

The definition of infrastructure to be included in each DC By-Law structure category is described below. Capacity This category represents projects related to Region-wide needs of water supply/treatment and wastewater treatment. The projects included under this definition are:

all studies all projects related to the Water Purification Plants (WPPs) and groundwater Well Fields all projects related to the Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs)

From a linear infrastructure perspective, the capacity category also represents projects that aid in the transfer/conveyance of capacity AND defer/eliminate the need for immediate treatment plant or well field expansions. The projects included under this definition are:

Major trunk infrastructure that facilitate transmission of water from existing WPPs to Burlington, Oakville, Milton and Halton Hills Zone 1 Feedermain from Burloak WPP to Kitchen Reservoir/Pumping Station (PS) Zone 1 Feedermain to Washburn Reservoir/PS Zone 1 Feedermain to Davis Road PS Zone 3 PS at Appleby Reservoir Zone 4 Feedermain to future Zone 4 Reservoir (north of Britannia Road) Zone 6 PS at future Zone 4 Reservoir Zone 6 Feedermain to No. 10 Sideroad

Major trunk infrastructure that facilitate conveyance of wastewater to existing WWTPs Boyne Trunk Sewer 8th Line Trunk Sewer (No. 10 Sideroad to Steeles Ave.)

Distribution – Greenfield This category represents projects that support Greenfield growth outside the current Urban Built Boundary (2006) and within the new Sustainable Halton Urban Boundary (2031). The projects under this definition can include:

Infrastructure located in the Greenfield service area Infrastructure located within the built boundary that convey flow to future growth areas Infrastructure including pipes, pumping stations and storage facilities

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 19

Distribution – Built Boundary This category represents projects that support growth within the current Urban Built Boundary only as defined under the Places to Grow process. This includes growth out to year 2031 related to infill within the Urban Built Boundary as well as focused intensification within the identified nodes, such as the Urban Growth Centres (UGCs), and corridors as identified under Sustainable Halton. The projects under this definition can include:

Infrastructure physically located within the Urban Built Boundary Infrastructure servicing only intensification and infill growth within the Urban Built Boundary Infrastructure identified under the detailed nodes (UGCs) and corridors servicing review for

intensification completed as part of the Sustainable Halton Master Plan

3.7.2 Existing Capacity

The servicing strategies were developed consistent with servicing policies identified in the Sustainable Halton Water and Wastewater Master Plan. In general, particularly for major facilities, the strategies are based on maximizing existing capacity in the facilities and scheduling capacity expansions on a just-in-time basis while ensuring operational effectiveness, flexibility and security to the system and users is not compromised. As such, at the time of expansion, there is generally an amount of existing capacity remaining. However, this amount of existing capacity, typically in the order of 5 – 10%, is needed in the system to ensure adequate level of service is maintained. This existing capacity has been present through historical expansions and will be present through future expansions. Each DC period has benefitted from previous existing capacity. Under this program, there is no allowance for existing capacity at the existing facilities.

3.7.3 Benefit to Existing (Non - Growth)

The non-growth component has typically been identified for certain projects which benefit the existing service area. These components are typically associated with upgrades to the existing systems or facilities necessary to maintain service levels to existing residential and non-residential users. These projects may also involve upgrades or expansions which provide additional capacity to meet growth in the service area. When considering intensification, critical security/redundancy requirements and impacts on critical existing trunk infrastructure, additional projects within the existing service area were identified. As well, it should be noted that there were some benefit to existing (non-growth) components within a small number of infrastructure capital projects that are predominantly required to service growth in new urban areas. With triggers ranging from growth to security/redundancy requirements, the growth related and non-growth related needs and corresponding capacity and costs for each of these projects have been separately identified. Detailed information regarding the allocated costs to Benefit to Existing (non-growth) for each project is shown in Appendix B.

3.7.4 DC Eligible Infrastructure

The minimum size criteria for DC eligible infrastructure described in the local service guidelines provided in Appendix C. The minimum criteria for DC eligible watermains is greater than 400 mm internal to the development and greater than and including 400 mm external to the development. For sewers, the minimum criteria for DC eligible sewers is greater than 450 mm diameter.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 20

The capital program reflects projects which are equal to or exceed the minimum diameter criteria inclusion for DC eligible projects. However, there are a few instances where certain projects are below this minimum diameter criteria. Given that these projects meet the intent to service and benefit growth areas well beyond the requirements of a single subdivision within the overall study areas, they are considered DC eligible projects. In addition, within smaller systems such the northern communities of Georgetown and Acton, the trunk system is typically smaller diameter than in South Halton. As such, some infrastructure has been included below the minimum diameter criteria given that these pipes provide trunk distribution/conveyance. Based on conformity with Places To Grow, 40% of future growth as of 2015 will take place as intensification within the existing built area. This intensification will impact local servicing as well as trunk servicing. The intensification demands and flows have been considered in the overall capacities of trunk infrastructure including feedermains, trunk sewers, pumping stations, storage facilities and treatment plants. As noted, an independent analysis of intensification impact was undertaken. This analysis resulted in additional intensification projects located within the existing local systems (critical for implementation and to be considered based on monitoring, respectively). Given that these projects service future growth similar to Greenfield areas, the projects have been classified as DC eligible infrastructure regardless of their size.

3.7.5 Oversizing

Although the development charge planning horizon is to year 2031, it is good engineering practice to provide sufficient capacity to meet servicing requirements beyond 20 years, particularly for larger diameter trunk piping and major structural components of major supply facilities. In addition, the sizing and capacity determined for 2031 needs must also provide a sufficient level of service to the new growth areas, ensure efficient integration with existing infrastructure, and not negatively impact current operations of the systems. Even after making this latter allowance, some infrastructure has been sized to meet needs beyond the development charge planning horizon. Review of the infrastructure capacity indicated that oversizing was required for some of the trunk facilities. This review showed that for projects with smaller diameter pipes which typically serviced more localized areas, many of these localized areas had only marginal additional flows beyond 2031. The trunk projects which service larger areas service a larger amount of flows beyond 2031. Also, the smaller diameter infrastructure typically cannot be downsized without impacting the system such as water pressures and fire flows for the water system and increased velocities and surcharging for the wastewater system. Accordingly, the oversizing requirements have been identified for some water feedermain, wastewater trunk sewers and water and wastewater treatment plants. Quantifying oversizing for these projects has been determined based on comparison of the infrastructure required to meet 2031 needs versus the recommended infrastructure sizing. The difference in cost for the recommended size of infrastructure and the size of infrastructure to meet the 2031 horizon has been allocated as the oversizing cost. Any oversizing identified through this analysis has been deducted from the 2031 DC recoverable costs and is to be recovered through subsequent DC by-law(s) covering the post 2031 period. It should be noted that the 2002 Master Plan as well as the 2007 Master Plan Update considered infrastructure sizing to an urban boundary built out scenario (2031) and post 2021 considerations respectively. Some projects previously oversized to meet the 2031 horizon are now integrated into the current Sustainable Halton program and now no longer have oversizing based on the current 2031 bylaw period. Appendix B provides more detailed information regarding each project allocated costs to Oversizing (post period growth).

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 21

3.7.6 Residential/Non Residential

The development charge eligible share of the capital program included in this Technical Report has been split between benefit to residential development versus benefit to non-residential development within each DC By-Law category. The Residential/Non-Residential split is based on the percentage of the total anticipated flow increase to be generated by each class of development. This is the standard calculation approach which has been applied by other municipalities (e.g. Peel Region, York Region) and was similarly used during the 2004 and 2008 Halton DC update. A revision of the 2008 Halton DC Update involves the application of Residential/Non-Residential splits across the full Region as opposed to differentiation between North and South Halton. In addition, the Residential/Non-Residential splits have been calculated for each DC By-Law category. The capacity category is based on Region-wide calculated flows. The Distribution – Greenfield category is based on flows calculated for the Greenfield areas only. The Distribution – Built Boundary category is based on flows calculated for the growth within the 2006 Urban Built Boundary only. For water projects, the splits are based on the maximum day demand attributed to the growth from year 2012 to year 2031. Similarly, for wastewater projects, the splits are based on average day wet weather wastewater flows for the growth from 2012 to 2031. The growth related flows have been calculated using the serviced area projections previously summarized in Table 3 and Table 4. The Residential/Non-Residential contributions based on demands and flows for each DC By-Law category are shown in the following tables.

Table 14. Water Project Splits for the DC By-Law Categories

Category Planning Projections Growth Related Water

Demands (MLD)

Percentage

2011 (pop,empl)

2031 (pop,empl)

2012-2031 Growth

(pop,empl)

Capacity (Region Wide Split)

Residential 476,327 735,879 259,552 153.4 72%

Non-Residential 247,146 385,599 138,453 59.6 28%

Total 213.0 100%

Distribution – Greenfield

Residential 57,831 244,917 187,086 111.1 74%

Non-Residential 22,582 111,809 89,227 39.7 26%

Total 150.8 100%

Distribution – Built Boundary

Residential 418,496 490,962 72,466 42.3 68%

Non-Residential 224,564 273,790 49,226 19.9 32%

Total 62.2 100%

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 22

Table 15. Wastewater Project Splits for the DC By-Law Categories

Category Planning Projections Growth Related

Wastewater Flows (MLD)

Percentage

2011 (pop,empl)

2031 (pop,empl)

2012-2031 Growth

(pop,empl)

Capacity (Region Wide Split)

Residential Needs 476,327 735,879 259,552 94.8 69%

Non-Residential Needs 247,146 385,599 138,453 42.1 31%

Total Needs 136.9 100%

Distribution – Greenfield

Residential Needs 57,831 244,917 187,086 68.4 71%

Non-Residential Needs 22,582 111,809 89,227 28.2 29%

Total Needs 96.6 100%

Distribution – Built Boundary

Residential Needs 418,496 490,962 72,466 26.4 66%

Non-Residential Needs 224,564 273,790 49,226 13.9 34%

Total Needs 40.3 100%

3.7.7 Project Timing

Under the Sustainable Halton Master Plan, the scope of each project and the timing for the 2021 program was updated from the previous servicing strategy based on the BPE Data June 2011 and status of the current implementation program. The timing for the projects servicing the new growth areas out to 2031 were also developed based on the BPE Data June 2011 and realistic phasing opportunities co-ordinated with Regional planning. This process took into consideration a logical extension of growth from the existing development. The evaluation of timing also took into consideration the availability of and need to maximize the use of existing infrastructure and best judgement on reasonable timing of subsequent expansions. For the major facility expansions, such as the Burloak WPP and Mid-Halton WWTP, single larger expansions have been considered to minimize the construction periods at the site and avoid scheduling subsequent work immediately following completion of the previous project. Notwithstanding the larger expansions proposed for the near term, the 2031 capacity needs as well as the potential mature state capacity needs beyond 2031 have triggered the requirement for additional future expansion of the Burloak WPP and Mid-Halton WWTP. These future expansions will provide capacity beyond the 2031 planning horizon. Project timing was also integrated with the results of recent Transportation studies, Class Environmental Assessment Studies Reports and Master Plans (2011) to endeavour to schedule underground infrastructure before completion of road improvements. This did result in several projects being moved forward.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 23

4. Water Servicing Requirements

4.1 Water Service Areas

The service areas were reviewed for each project through determination of the project’s location as well as its relationship to the overall system operation. Evaluation of the planning data and ultimately the project requirements was completed through summarizing the water demands for the following geographic areas:

Complete lake-based service area (i.e., serviced by all WPPs) Milton well-based service area (i.e., serviced by Milton wells) Acton well-based service area (i.e., serviced by Acton wells) Georgetown well-based service area (i.e., serviced by Georgetown wells) Pressure zones and downstream pressure zones (i.e., serviced by pumping stations and feedermains) Localized TSZs (i.e., serviced by local trunk watermains).

The Halton Region water pressure zones are depicted in Figure 5. As noted, the pressure zones are identified by the local municipality. Oakville is serviced by 4 primary pressure zones O1, O2, O3 and O4 with sub-pressure zones fed through isolated supply points (O2A). Burlington is serviced by 5 pressure zones B1, B2, B3, B4 and B5 as well as B1A for the Aldershot area, B1B and B5B for the areas in North Aldershot serviced by Hamilton such as Bridgeview, and B3A, B4A and B5A for the future growth areas in North Aldershot which have significant change in topography. Milton is serviced by 2 lake-based pressure zones M4L, which will be interconnected with O4, and M5L. Milton also maintains a groundwater-based pressure zone M5G. The Acton groundwater system is pressure zone A9G. The Georgetown groundwater system include pressure zones G5G, G6G and G7G. It is also proposed to service the new growth in Georgetown by Lake Based supply which will be designated as pressure zone G6L.

4.2 Water Demand Projections

Based on the June 2011 BPE data and Design Criteria, the Halton Water Demand Projections have been established and are summarized in Table 16.

4.3 Water Servicing Flow Schematics

In order to evaluate the water servicing requirements including immediate pressure zone demands as well as capacity required to service subsequent pressure zones, water servicing flow schematics were developed for each of the planning intervals. The flow schematics are depicted in Figure 6 through Figure 10.

4.4 Water Storage Requirements

A summary of the water storage requirements by pressure zone is provided in Table 17.

Halton Hills

Milton

Oakville

Burlington

NO 15

DERRY

DUNDAS

SIX

TH

TR

AF

AL

GA

R

AP

PL

EB

Y

NO 5

HIGHWAY 407

NO 25

FIF

TH

LAKESHORE

HIGHWAY 401

GU

ELP

H

WA

LKE

R'S

SE

CO

ND

TR

EM

AIN

E

NO 20

FO

UR

TH

NEW

MAIN

TW

ISS

DU

BL

IN

QUEEN ELIZABETH WAY

FIR

ST

TE

NT

H

NIN

TH

NO 10

KIN

G

BR

AN

T

REBECCA

FAIRVIEW

NO 1

UPPER MIDDLE

BR

ON

TE

SPEERS

NO 17

MIL

BU

RO

UG

H

FO

RD

NO 30

MAINWAY

HIGHWAY 7

TH

OM

PS

ON

NO 3

WIN

ST

ON

CH

UR

CH

ILL

CE

DA

R S

PR

ING

S

CAMPBELLVILLE

EIG

HT

H

DO

RV

AL

RE

GIO

NA

L R

OA

D 2

5

HIGHWAY 403

STEELES

TH

IRD

HARVESTER KE

RR

NO 14

MILL

CORNWALL

NO 2

BURNHAMTHORPE

MC

NIV

EN

LOWER BASE

NO 4

NE

YA

GA

WA

BRITAN NIA

MAPLE

NO 32

MA

RT

IN

NA

SS

AG

AW

EY

A-E

SQ

UE

SIN

G

BU

RL

OA

K

MO

UN

TA

INV

IEW

ON

TA

RIO

PE

RU

NORTH SERVICE

KELSO

COLLING

NO 8

BL

IND

PLAINS

REID

KILBRIDE

BE

LL S

CH

OO

L

RIVER

WA

TE

RD

OW

N

NO 22

ES

QU

ES

ING

NO 28

NO 27

HIG

HW

AY

6

CAMPBELL

NA

SS

AG

AW

EY

A-P

US

CH

LIN

CH CH

UR

CH

ILL

ROYAL WINDSOR

NORTH SHORE

BO

ST

ON

CH

UR

CH

CLAYHILL

CH

AR

TW

ELL

FALLBROOK

AUBURN

WYECROFT

MO

RR

ISO

N

NO

TT

ING

HIL

L

HO

RN

BY

EA

ST

PO

RT

CO

NF

ED

ER

AT

ION

RE

YN

OL

DS

CR

EW

SO

NS

NO 12

ADA

MSO

N

LEIGHLAND

SOUTH SERVICEINDUSTRIAL

CROSS

SE

NE

CA

MIS

SIS

SA

GA

QUEENSWAY

PRINCE

GLEN LAWSON

HA

LL

JAMES

JAMES SNOW

NIN

TH

RE

GIO

NA

L R

OA

D 2

5

WIN

ST

ON

CH

UR

CH

ILL

EIG

HT

H

MA

IN

FO

UR

TH

HIG

HW

AY

403

EIG

HT

H

SIX

TH

NO 22

NO 20

EIG

HT

H

CAMPBELLVILLE

NORTH SERVICE

TE

NT

H

MA

PLE

FIR

ST

NIN

TH

TH

IRD

DU

BL

IN

NIN

TH

HIGHWAY 403

MA

IN

FIF

TH

PL

AIN

S

NO 17

NO 17

SIX

TH

FIF

TH

MIL

BU

RO

UG

H

BURNHAMTHORPE

GU

ELP

H

HIGHWAY 7

TH

IRD

TH

IRD

FO

UR

TH

NO 2

STEELES

UPPER MIDDLE

WA

LKE

R'S

FIF

TH

GU

ELP

H

NO 27

NO 2

FOURTH

LOWER BASE

SOUTH SERVICE

GUELPH

TH

IRD

NO 32

MA

IN

TR

AF

AL

GA

R

BRITAN NIA

BE

LL S

CH

OO

L

HIGHW

AY 407

BR

ON

TE

NO 22

NO 1

MA

IN

NA

SS

AG

AW

EY

A-P

US

CH

LIN

CH

NO 1

NO 3

BRITAN NIAF

IRS

T HIGHWAY 401

NO 3

EIG

HT

H

SIX

TH

MIL

BU

RO

UG

H

WIN

ST

ON

CH

UR

CH

ILL

FO

UR

TH

FO

UR

TH

TE

NT

H

NO 17

EIG

HT

H

BU

RL

OA

K

TE

NT

H

HIG

HW

AY

403

NO 10

NO 30

BRITAN NIA

B1

B1A

B2

B3

B4

O1

O2

O2A

O3

O4

M4L

G6L

M5G

M5L

G5G

G6G

A9G

B5

David PS

Kelso PS

Kelso WPP

Zone 4 ET

Moore Res

Kelso Well

Bailie Res

4th Line PS

Burloak WPP

Kitchen Res

Oakville WPP

Beaufort Res

McCraney Res

Washburn Res

Tyandaga Res

Main St. Res

Moore Park PS

Davidson Well

4th Line Well

Todd Rd Tower

Waterdown Res

Burlington WPP

Headon Rd. Res

Baillie (B-4) PS

Walker's Line PS

Davidson Well #2

Norval Standpipe

Appleby Line Res

8th Line (O-3) PS

Tyandaga (B-4) PS

Prospect Park WPP

Cedarvale Well #2

22nd Sideroad Res

Prospect Park Well

Walker's Line Well

Steeles Ave. Tower

Waterdown Standpipe

Burnhamthorpe Rd. Elevated T.

B1B B3A

B4A

B5A

B5B

G7G

Sustainable Halton

³

1:180,000July 2011

File: 60114062-202-W

Halton WaterFuture Pressure Zones

±Legend#* Existing Pumping Station

H Existing Well

!( Existing Standpipe

") Existing Reservoir

$+ Existing Water Purification Plant

^ Existing Elevated Tower

Existing Feedermain

Future Milton Groundwater Servicing

Future Milton Lake Base Servicing

Study Area Boundary

Future Pressure ZoneB1

B1A

B1B

B2

B3

B4

B5

B3A

B4A

B5A

B5B

O1

O2

O2A

O3

O4

M4L

M5G

M5L

G5G

G6G

G6L

G7G

A9G

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 25

Table 16. Water Demand Projections

Design criteria

Max Day Peak Factor (PF)

Lake Based and Milton GW

Peak Hour PF Lake Based

GT and Acton PFGroundwater

Lpcd Res 330 (314 with 5% reduction)

1.9 3 1.6

L/emp/d Industrial 302

Commercial 213

Institutional 72

POPULATION

AVERAGE DAY RESIDENTIAL DEMANDS (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY RESIDENTIAL DEMANDS (ML/D) PEAK HOUR RESIDENTIAL DEMANDS (ML/D)

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

B1 85,604 86,110 87,977 91,417 93,901 B1 23.21 23.36 23.95 25.03 25.81 B1 44.09 44.39 45.51 47.56 49.04 B1 69.62 70.09 71.85 75.09 77.43

B1A 10,907 11,105 11,411 11,379 11,604 B1A 2.93 3.00 3.09 3.08 3.15 B1A 5.57 5.69 5.88 5.86 5.99 B1A 8.80 8.99 9.28 9.25 9.46

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

1,164 1,714 2,188 2,172 2,169

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.30 0.48 0.62 0.62 0.62

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.58 0.90 1.19 1.18 1.18

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.91 1.43 1.87 1.86 1.86

B1B 149 150 149 145 143 B1B 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 B1B 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 B1B 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12

B2 19,504 19,620 19,902 19,939 20,400 B2 5.04 5.07 5.16 5.17 5.32 B2 9.57 9.64 9.81 9.83 10.10 B2 15.11 15.22 15.48 15.52 15.95

B3 50,504 50,876 51,445 51,429 52,460 B3 14.03 14.15 14.33 14.32 14.64 B3 26.66 26.88 27.22 27.21 27.82 B3 42.09 42.44 42.98 42.96 43.93

B4 9,563 9,617 9,701 9,677 9,879 B4 2.76 2.78 2.80 2.79 2.86 B4 5.24 5.27 5.32 5.31 5.43 B4 8.27 8.33 8.40 8.38 8.57

B5 303 300 294 288 284 B5 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 B5 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.16 B5 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.25

M4L 10,702 35,637 64,068 93,173 119,474 M4L 2.62 10.45 19.38 28.52 36.77 M4L 4.98 19.86 36.82 54.18 69.87 M4L 7.86 31.35 58.13 85.55 110.32

M5L 47,659 56,918 64,006 68,152 72,952 M5L 14.16 17.35 19.87 21.36 22.91 M5L 26.91 32.97 37.75 40.59 43.53 M5L 42.49 52.05 59.61 64.09 68.72

M5G 24,392 26,376 27,871 28,262 29,023 M5G 4.68 5.02 5.20 5.13 5.33 M5G 8.89 9.54 9.87 9.74 10.13 M5G 14.03 15.06 15.59 15.38 15.99

G6L 762 770 759 11,825 19,904 G6L 0.02 0.02 3.68 7.35 10.03 G6L 0.03 0.03 6.61 13.59 18.69 G6L 0.05 0.05 12.39 23.44 31.55

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

35,967 38,232 41,482 43,422 49,209

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

11.34 12.05 9.40 9.82 11.49

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

18.14 19.28 14.33 14.93 17.81

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

34.02 36.15 26.87 28.07 33.02

A9G 10,036 9,796 10,379 12,874 13,981 A9G 2.46 2.38 2.57 3.35 3.70 A9G 3.93 3.81 4.11 5.36 5.91 A9G 7.37 7.15 7.70 10.05 11.09

O1 54,513 55,624 57,959 59,988 62,343 O1 14.78 15.13 15.86 16.50 17.24 O1 28.08 28.74 30.13 31.35 32.75 O1 44.34 45.38 47.58 49.49 51.71

O2 20,062 22,068 26,684 30,878 34,471 O2 5.29 5.92 7.37 8.69 9.82 O2 10.06 11.26 14.01 16.51 18.66 O2 15.88 17.77 22.12 26.07 29.46

O2A 4,770 4,651 4,544 4,466 4,417 O2A 1.30 1.26 1.23 1.21 1.19 O2A 2.47 2.40 2.34 2.29 2.26 O2A 3.90 3.79 3.69 3.62 3.57

O3 70,612 72,196 72,199 72,011 73,964 O3 19.22 19.72 19.72 19.66 20.28 O3 36.53 37.47 37.47 37.36 38.53 O3 57.67 59.17 59.17 58.99 60.83

O4 17,175 35,472 52,647 58,866 63,079 O4 4.24 9.98 15.37 17.33 18.65 O4 8.05 18.97 29.21 32.92 35.44 O4 12.71 29.95 46.12 51.98 55.95

Rural 16,719 16,435 16,258 16,326 16,658 Rural 5.25 5.16 5.10 5.13 5.23 Rural 9.97 9.80 9.70 9.74 9.94 Rural 15.75 15.48 15.31 15.38 15.69

Glen

Williams 1,656 1,694 1,813 1,838 1,852

Glen

Williams 0.52 0.53 0.57 0.58 0.58

Glen

Williams0.99 1.01 1.08 1.10 1.10

Glen

Williams 1.56 1.60 1.71 1.73 1.74

Norval 323 345 356 367 367 Norval 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 Norval 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 Norval 0.30 0.33 0.33 0.35 0.35

Grand

Total 493,045 555,707 624,094 688,895 752,537

Grand

Total 134.38 154.05 175.53 195.87 215.86

Grand

Total 251.18 288.37 328.81 367.05 404.62

Grand

Total 403.13 462.16 526.58 587.62 647.57

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 26

INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYEES

AVERAGE DAY INDUSTRIAL DEMANDS (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY INDUSTRIAL DEMANDS (ML/D) PEAK HOUR INDUSTRIAL DEMAND (ML/D)

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

B1 7,552 8,658 8,691 8,836 9,424 B1 2.04 2.37 2.38 2.42 2.60 B1 3.87 4.50 4.52 4.60 4.94 B1 6.11 7.11 7.14 7.27 7.80

B1A 2,194 2,248 2,254 2,284 2,307 B1A 0.59 0.61 0.61 0.62 0.62 B1A 1.12 1.15 1.15 1.17 1.18 B1A 1.77 1.82 1.82 1.85 1.87

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0 0 0 0 0

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B1B 123 136 137 142 152 B1B 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 B1B 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 B1B 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.13

B2 22,432 22,603 22,887 23,030 23,130 B2 5.81 5.86 5.95 5.99 6.02 B2 11.04 11.14 11.30 11.39 11.44 B2 17.43 17.59 17.85 17.98 18.07

B3 4,604 4,769 4,858 4,955 5,069 B3 1.29 1.34 1.37 1.39 1.43 B3 2.45 2.54 2.59 2.65 2.71 B3 3.87 4.01 4.10 4.18 4.29

B4 78 85 88 97 99 B4 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 B4 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 B4 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08

B5 12 14 15 15 15 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

M4L 835 2,430 2,981 3,378 8,465 M4L 0.22 0.70 0.86 0.98 2.52 M4L 0.41 1.33 1.64 1.87 4.79 M4L 0.65 2.09 2.59 2.95 7.56

M5L 16,462 20,268 24,245 34,233 42,305 M5L 4.54 5.70 6.92 10.06 12.59 M5L 8.63 10.82 13.15 19.11 23.91 M5L 13.63 17.09 20.76 30.17 37.76

M5G 4,242 4,949 5,494 5,566 5,980 M5G 0.66 0.87 1.02 0.92 0.95 M5G 1.26 1.66 1.93 1.75 1.81 M5G 1.99 2.62 3.05 2.76 2.85

G6L 103 103 103 104 108 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.56 0.51 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.61 0.52 G6L 0.00 0.00 1.44 1.18 1.02

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

4,644 4,688 4,810 4,942 5,135

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

1.47 1.48 1.15 1.20 1.27

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

2.35 2.37 2.06 2.14 2.24

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

4.41 4.45 4.19 4.32 4.50

A9G 1,467 1,505 1,634 1,862 2,004 A9G 0.36 0.37 0.41 0.48 0.52 A9G 0.57 0.59 0.65 0.76 0.83 A9G 1.07 1.11 1.22 1.43 1.56

O1 4,893 4,977 5,719 5,776 6,002 O1 1.30 1.33 1.55 1.57 1.64 O1 2.47 2.52 2.95 2.98 3.11 O1 3.91 3.98 4.66 4.71 4.91

O2 26,037 27,027 27,062 27,115 28,014 O2 6.86 7.15 7.17 7.18 7.45 O2 13.03 13.59 13.61 13.64 14.16 O2 20.57 21.46 21.50 21.54 22.36

O2A 1,127 1,127 1,130 1,133 1,184 O2A 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 O2A 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.59 0.62 O2A 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.97

O3 7,633 11,741 15,000 15,003 15,133 O3 2.11 3.35 4.34 4.34 4.38 O3 4.02 6.37 8.24 8.24 8.32 O3 6.34 10.06 13.02 13.02 13.14

O4 91 860 4,138 4,811 5,275 O4 0.02 0.26 1.25 1.45 1.59 O4 0.04 0.49 2.37 2.75 3.02 O4 0.07 0.77 3.74 4.35 4.77

Rural 2,149 2,261 2,320 2,354 2,397 Rural 0.67 0.71 0.73 0.74 0.75 Rural 1.28 1.34 1.38 1.40 1.42 Rural 2.02 2.12 2.18 2.21 2.25

Glen

Williams 10 10 10 10 10

Glen

Williams 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Glen

Williams0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Glen

Williams 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Norval 33 33 33 33 33 Norval 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Norval 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Norval 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

Grand

Total 106,721 120,492 133,608 145,681 162,240

Grand

Total 28.32 32.48 36.72 40.29 45.25

Grand

Total 53.3 61.2 69.1 75.8 85.2

Grand

Total 85.0 97.4 110.4 121.1 135.9

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 27

COMMERCIAL EMPLOYEES

AVERAGE DAY COMMERCIAL DEMAND (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY COMMERCIAL DEMAND (ML/D) PEAK HOUR COMMERCIAL DEMAND (ML/D)

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

B1 24,054 24,884 26,744 27,208 27,305 B1 6.28 6.45 6.85 6.95 6.97 B1 11.93 12.26 13.01 13.20 13.24 B1 18.83 19.36 20.55 20.85 20.91

B1A 3,347 3,475 3,554 3,584 3,657 B1A 0.89 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.96 B1A 1.69 1.74 1.77 1.79 1.82 B1A 2.67 2.75 2.80 2.82 2.87

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0 0 0 0 0

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B1B 31 32 33 33 34 B1B 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B1B 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 B1B 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

B2 19,374 19,795 20,406 20,547 20,866 B2 4.97 5.06 5.19 5.22 5.29 B2 9.44 9.61 9.86 9.92 10.05 B2 14.91 15.18 15.57 15.66 15.86

B3 6,808 7,209 7,962 8,109 8,546 B3 1.84 1.93 2.09 2.12 2.21 B3 3.50 3.66 3.97 4.03 4.21 B3 5.53 5.79 6.27 6.36 6.64

B4 454 489 507 517 522 B4 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 B4 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.27 B4 0.38 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.42

B5 0 0 0 0 0 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

M4L 336 2,466 5,968 9,538 15,658 M4L 0.07 0.53 1.27 2.03 3.34 M4L 0.14 1.00 2.42 3.86 6.34 M4L 0.22 1.58 3.82 6.10 10.01

M5L 12,208 18,219 24,947 28,020 31,955 M5L 3.06 4.38 5.88 6.53 7.38 M5L 5.81 8.33 11.16 12.40 14.02 M5L 9.17 13.15 17.63 19.58 22.14

M5G 4,199 5,684 7,114 7,824 8,019 M5G 0.73 1.00 1.25 1.40 1.43 M5G 1.39 1.90 2.37 2.67 2.72 M5G 2.20 3.01 3.75 4.21 4.29

G6L 58 58 58 920 1,294 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.87 0.92 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.86 1.11 1.18 G6L 0.00 0.00 1.61 2.00 2.10

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

5,216 5,287 5,487 5,617 6,054

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

1.64 1.66 1.28 1.29 1.37

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

2.63 2.65 2.30 2.32 2.46

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

4.93 4.98 4.69 4.75 5.01

A9G 1,260 1,490 1,618 1,751 1,861 A9G 0.31 0.35 0.38 0.41 0.43 A9G 0.49 0.57 0.61 0.66 0.69 A9G 0.92 1.06 1.14 1.23 1.30

O1 8,728 9,137 9,346 9,385 9,843 O1 2.37 2.46 2.51 2.51 2.61 O1 4.51 4.68 4.76 4.78 4.96 O1 7.12 7.38 7.52 7.54 7.84

O2 13,631 15,702 16,943 17,440 18,992 O2 3.47 3.91 4.18 4.28 4.62 O2 6.60 7.44 7.94 8.14 8.77 O2 10.42 11.74 12.54 12.85 13.85

O2A 282 282 282 282 282 O2A 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 O2A 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 O2A 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23

O3 7,213 11,058 12,003 12,009 12,391 O3 1.94 2.76 2.96 2.96 3.04 O3 3.68 5.24 5.62 5.62 5.78 O3 5.81 8.27 8.87 8.88 9.12

O4 5,261 6,619 8,956 9,238 9,513 O4 1.19 1.48 1.98 2.04 2.10 O4 2.27 2.82 3.77 3.88 3.99 O4 3.58 4.45 5.94 6.12 6.30

Rural 1,168 1,244 1,269 1,322 1,427 Rural 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.39 0.42 Rural 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75 0.79 Rural 1.08 1.13 1.15 1.18 1.25

Glen

Williams 18 18 18 18 20

Glen

Williams 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Glen

Williams0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Glen

Williams 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

Norval 21 21 21 57 57 Norval 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Norval 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.03 Norval 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.04

Grand

Total 113,667 133,170 153,236 163,420 178,296

Grand

Total 29.4 33.5 38.1 40.2 43.3

Grand

Total 55.2 63.1 71.6 75.6 81.5

Grand

Total 88.1 100.5 114.5 120.9 130.2

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 28

INSTITUTIONAL EMPLOYEES

AVERAGE DAY INSTITUTIONAL DEMAND (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY INSTITUTIONAL DEMAND (ML/D) PEAK HOUR INSTITUTIONAL DEMAND (ML/D)

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

B1 3,234 3,578 3,812 3,853 3,894 B1 0.78 0.80 0.82 0.82 0.83 B1 1.48 1.53 1.56 1.56 1.57 B1 2.33 2.41 2.46 2.47 2.48

B1A 581 619 726 746 747 B1A 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 B1A 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.26 B1A 0.38 0.39 0.41 0.41 0.41

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

25 27 29 29 29

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

B1B 0 0 0 0 0 B1B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B1B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B1B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

B2 724 754 752 759 760 B2 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 B2 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 B2 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.56 0.56

B3 491 509 514 515 516 B3 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 B3 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 B3 0.40 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41

B4 143 151 154 155 155 B4 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 B4 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 B4 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12

B5 0 0 0 0 0 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

M4L 357 1,201 2,158 6,012 7,171 M4L 0.05 0.11 0.18 0.46 0.54 M4L 0.10 0.21 0.35 0.87 1.03 M4L 0.16 0.34 0.55 1.38 1.63

M5L 3,738 4,852 6,344 6,764 7,173 M5L 0.97 1.04 1.14 1.16 1.19 M5L 1.85 1.97 2.17 2.21 2.26 M5L 2.92 3.11 3.42 3.49 3.56

M5G 2,117 2,887 3,803 4,664 4,728 M5G 0.41 0.48 0.55 0.62 0.63 M5G 0.77 0.91 1.04 1.17 1.19 M5G 1.22 1.44 1.65 1.85 1.88

G6L 29 29 29 363 557 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.34 0.32 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.39 0.36 G6L 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.73 0.68

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

2,709 2,709 2,711 2,738 2,872

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

0.85 0.85 0.64 0.65 0.67

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

1.36 1.36 1.15 1.16 1.19

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

2.55 2.55 2.34 2.36 2.39

A9G 1,064 1,090 1,102 1,131 1,206 A9G 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 A9G 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.42 A9G 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.78 0.79

O1 3,498 3,519 3,527 3,546 3,657 O1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 O1 1.80 1.80 1.80 1.81 1.82 O1 2.84 2.84 2.85 2.85 2.87

O2 1,842 2,039 2,277 2,348 2,575 O2 0.46 0.47 0.49 0.50 0.51 O2 0.88 0.90 0.93 0.94 0.98 O2 1.38 1.42 1.48 1.49 1.54

O2A 534 609 626 631 656 O2A 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 O2A 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 O2A 0.44 0.45 0.46 0.46 0.46

O3 5,734 6,046 6,788 6,845 7,165 O3 1.54 1.56 1.62 1.62 1.64 O3 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.08 3.12 O3 4.62 4.69 4.85 4.86 4.93

O4 3,194 3,659 4,911 4,914 4,958 O4 0.52 0.55 0.64 0.64 0.64 O4 0.98 1.05 1.22 1.22 1.23 O4 1.55 1.65 1.92 1.92 1.93

Rural 469 492 517 530 577 Rural 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Rural 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.29 Rural 0.43 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.45

Glen

Williams 23 23 23 25 25

Glen

Williams 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Glen

Williams0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

Glen

Williams 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

Norval 38 38 38 41 41 Norval 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Norval 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Norval 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04

Grand

Total 30,544 34,831 40,839 46,610 49,463

Grand

Total 7.6 7.9 8.5 8.8 9.0

Grand

Total 14.1 14.7 15.7 16.4 16.7

Grand

Total 22.7 23.7 25.5 26.7 27.2

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 29

TOTAL EMPLOYEES

AVERAGE DAY TOTAL ICI DEMAND (ML/D) MAXIMUM DAY TOTAL ICI DEMAND (ML/D) PEAK HOUR TOTAL ICI DEMAND (ML/D)

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

B1 34,839 37,120 39,246 39,898 40,622 B1 9.09 9.63 10.05 10.19 10.39 B1 17.27 18.29 19.09 19.37 19.75 B1 27.27 28.88 30.14 30.58 31.18

B1A 6,122 6,342 6,533 6,614 6,711 B1A 1.61 1.65 1.68 1.70 1.72 B1A 3.05 3.14 3.19 3.22 3.26 B1A 4.82 4.95 5.03 5.09 5.15

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

25 27 29 29 29

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

B1B 153 168 170 176 186 B1B 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 B1B 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 B1B 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.16

B2 42,530 43,152 44,044 44,337 44,756 B2 10.96 11.11 11.32 11.40 11.50 B2 20.83 21.10 21.51 21.65 21.84 B2 32.89 33.32 33.97 34.19 34.49

B3 11,903 12,486 13,335 13,580 14,131 B3 3.27 3.40 3.59 3.65 3.78 B3 6.21 6.47 6.82 6.94 7.18 B3 9.80 10.21 10.77 10.95 11.34

B4 676 726 749 769 776 B4 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.21 B4 0.36 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.40 B4 0.56 0.59 0.61 0.62 0.63

B5 12 14 15 15 15 B5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B5 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

M4L 1,529 6,098 11,107 18,928 31,295 M4L 0.34 1.34 2.32 3.48 6.40 M4L 0.65 2.54 4.41 6.61 12.16 M4L 1.03 4.01 6.96 10.43 19.20

M5L 32,408 43,338 55,536 69,017 81,434 M5L 8.57 11.12 13.93 17.75 21.15 M5L 16.29 21.12 26.48 33.72 40.19 M5L 25.72 33.35 41.80 53.24 63.46

M5G 10,558 13,520 16,411 18,054 18,727 M5G 1.80 2.36 2.81 2.94 3.01 M5G 3.43 4.48 5.35 5.59 5.72 M5G 5.41 7.07 8.44 8.82 9.03

G6L 190 190 190 1,387 1,959 G6L 0.00 0.00 1.73 1.77 1.75 G6L 0.00 0.00 2.05 2.11 2.06 G6L 0.00 0.00 3.84 3.91 3.79

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

12,569 12,684 13,008 13,297 14,061

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

3.96 3.99 2.34 2.58 2.86

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

6.34 6.39 4.47 4.91 5.41

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

11.89 11.98 8.37 9.14 10.02

A9G 3,791 4,085 4,354 4,744 5,071 A9G 0.92 0.98 1.05 1.15 1.22 A9G 1.47 1.57 1.67 1.83 1.95 A9G 2.75 2.94 3.14 3.44 3.65

O1 17,119 17,633 18,591 18,707 19,502 O1 4.62 4.74 5.01 5.03 5.21 O1 8.78 9.00 9.51 9.56 9.89 O1 13.87 14.21 15.02 15.10 15.62

O2 41,510 44,768 46,282 46,903 49,580 O2 10.79 11.54 11.84 11.96 12.58 O2 20.50 21.93 22.49 22.73 23.90 O2 32.37 34.63 35.51 35.89 37.74

O2A 1,943 2,018 2,038 2,046 2,122 O2A 0.53 0.53 0.54 0.54 0.55 O2A 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.02 1.05 O2A 1.59 1.60 1.61 1.61 1.66

O3 20,580 28,845 33,791 33,856 34,690 O3 5.59 7.67 8.91 8.92 9.06 O3 10.62 14.58 16.93 16.94 17.22 O3 16.77 23.02 26.74 26.75 27.19

O4 8,546 11,138 18,005 18,963 19,747 O4 1.74 2.29 3.87 4.13 4.33 O4 3.30 4.35 7.35 7.85 8.24 O4 5.21 6.87 11.61 12.40 13.00

Rural 3,786 3,997 4,107 4,206 4,400 Rural 1.18 1.23 1.26 1.28 1.32 Rural 2.24 2.34 2.39 2.43 2.50 Rural 3.54 3.69 3.77 3.83 3.95

Glen

Williams 51 51 51 53 55

Glen

Williams 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

Glen

Williams0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03

Glen

Williams 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

Norval 92 92 92 131 131 Norval 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 Norval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.07 Norval 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11

Grand

Total 250,932 288,493 327,684 355,710 390,000

Grand

Total 65.3 73.9 82.5 88.8 97.2

Grand

Total 122.5 138.9 155.3 167.1 182.9

Grand

Total 195.8 221.6 247.6 266.3 291.5

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 30

AVERAGE DAY TOTAL RESIDENTIAL & ICI DEMAND (ML/D)

MAXIMUM DAY TOTAL RESIDENTIAL & ICI DEMAND (ML/D) PEAK HOUR TOTAL RESIDENTIAL & ICI DEMAND (ML/D)

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Pressure Zone

2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

B1 32.29 32.99 34.00 35.22 36.21 B1 61.36 62.68 64.60 66.93 68.79 B1 96.88 98.97 101.99 105.67 108.62

B1A 4.54 4.65 4.77 4.78 4.87 B1A 8.63 8.83 9.06 9.08 9.25 B1A 13.62 13.94 14.31 14.33 14.61

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.31 0.48 0.63 0.63 0.63

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.59 0.92 1.20 1.19 1.19

B3A,

B4A,

B5A

0.93 1.45 1.89 1.88 1.88

B1B 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 B1B 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.18 B1B 0.25 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.28

B2 16.00 16.18 16.48 16.57 16.81 B2 30.40 30.74 31.32 31.48 31.94 B2 48.00 48.54 49.45 49.71 50.44

B3 17.30 17.55 17.92 17.97 18.42 B3 32.86 33.34 34.04 34.15 35.00 B3 51.89 52.65 53.75 53.92 55.27

B4 2.95 2.97 3.00 3.00 3.07 B4 5.60 5.65 5.71 5.70 5.83 B4 8.84 8.92 9.01 9.01 9.20

B5 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 B5 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 B5 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.26

M4L 2.96 11.79 21.70 31.99 43.17 M4L 5.63 22.40 41.22 60.79 82.03 M4L 8.89 35.36 65.09 95.98 129.52

M5L 22.74 28.47 33.80 39.11 44.06 M5L 43.20 54.09 64.23 74.31 83.72 M5L 68.21 85.40 101.41 117.33 132.18

M5G 6.48 7.38 8.01 8.07 8.34 M5G 12.31 14.01 15.22 15.33 15.84 M5G 19.44 22.13 24.03 24.20 25.02

G6L 0.02 0.02 5.41 9.12 11.78 G6L 0.03 0.03 8.66 15.70 20.75 G6L 0.05 0.06 16.23 27.35 35.35

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

15.30 16.04 11.75 12.40 14.35

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

24.48 25.67 18.80 19.84 23.21

G5G,

G6G,

G7G

45.91 48.13 35.24 37.20 43.04

A9G 3.37 3.36 3.61 4.49 4.91 A9G 5.40 5.38 5.78 7.19 7.86 A9G 10.12 10.08 10.83 13.48 14.74

O1 19.40 19.86 20.87 21.53 22.44 O1 36.86 37.74 39.65 40.91 42.64 O1 58.21 59.59 62.60 64.59 67.33

O2 16.08 17.47 19.21 20.65 22.40 O2 30.56 33.19 36.50 39.24 42.56 O2 48.25 52.41 57.63 61.96 67.20

O2A 1.83 1.80 1.77 1.74 1.74 O2A 3.48 3.42 3.36 3.31 3.32 O2A 5.49 5.39 5.30 5.23 5.23

O3 24.82 27.39 28.63 28.58 29.34 O3 47.15 52.05 54.41 54.30 55.74 O3 74.45 82.18 85.90 85.74 88.02

O4 5.97 12.27 19.24 21.46 22.98 O4 11.35 23.32 36.56 40.77 43.67 O4 17.92 36.82 57.73 64.38 68.95

Rural 6.43 6.39 6.36 6.40 6.55 Rural 12.21 12.14 12.09 12.17 12.44 Rural 19.29 19.17 19.08 19.21 19.64

Glen

Williams 0.54 0.55 0.59 0.59 0.60

Glen

Williams 1.02 1.04 1.11 1.13 1.14

Glen

Williams1.61 1.64 1.76 1.78 1.79

Norval 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 Norval 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.29 0.29 Norval 0.39 0.41 0.42 0.46 0.46

Grand

Total 199.63 227.93 258.07 284.65 313.01

Grand

Total 373.70 427.25 484.11 534.14 587.57

Grand

Total 598.90 683.80 774.22 853.95 939.03

Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

29/07/2011

5 5

m m

ML MLML ML

ML MLML ML

ML ML

4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML

ML ML ML

236.22Equal. 2.84

Fire

Zone 4 ET Milton M4L

Milton ET

3.18

Fire 3.30

TWL 267.00

Equal. 9.40

Emerg.

1.38

TWL 236.22Equal. 1.41

Fire 3.30

Tyandaga. PS B-4

Required Pumping Capacity

236.221.40

2.05

0.09

Equal.

Burlington Water Distribution System

0.28 ML/D

Beaufort PS B-5

Required Pumping Capacity

Firm Capacity 1.00Installed Capacity 3.70

3.30

Beaufort ResTWL

Total

Existing Storage

FireEmerg.

TWL

5.88

Existing Storage

Total

Firm Capacity

4th Line M5L Pumps

Required Pumping Capacity

0.00 ML/D

0.00

5.68

Total 6.92

Existing Storage

Emerg. Emerg. 1.18Empl. Force303121.17

Max.Day (ML/D)

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.28

5.87

-----

Pressure Zone

B-5100.0%

2.70

Installed Capacity

B5

0.0%0.00

M-5L

June 2011 Planning DataJune 2011 Planning Data

6.83

15.88

0.28

0.18

292.22

Res. PopulationMilton Transfer M5T

Res. Population 5.58

Emerg. 3.18Total 9.05

Existing Storage

Milton Z5 Res

TWL 267.00

Equal. 9.40Fire 3.30

Existing Storage

Oakville Water Distribution System

2011 2011

Total

2011SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

M5L 30%HGL

3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML

m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML

ML

HGL

2mMLMLMLML

HGL ML

HGL

O3 0%

2 2m m

HGL ML MLML MLML ML

ML ML

ML ML

236.00

Required Pumping Capacity 43.73

Installed Capacity

NO M4L Pumps

Equal.

Total

Installed Capacity

0.00

18.86

Res. Population

11.79

0.00

0.00

M-4L/O-4

0.00 ML/D

Eighth Line Res

26.80

100.0%

16.98

3.77

64.45

Required Pumping Capacity

167.64

Existing Storage7.67

Eighth Line BPS O-3

Required Pumping Capacity

22.34 ML/D

28.2960.0%

O-3

Peak Hr. (ML/D)

65,356

0.00

Installed Capacity

50,504

100.00

0.00

0.00

100.0%

TWL 167.70

Pressure Zone277.67

100.0%0.59

B2, B3A, B5A

Peak Hr. (ML/D)

B2, B3A, B5A

0Max.Day (ML/D)

Res. Population 1,164Empl. Force

0.93

0.59

Waterdown ET Fire

B-4

TWL 277.67Equal. 0.15

3.30Emerg. 0.86Total 4.31

Fire

Emerg.

Existing Storage 2.0

O4

Eighth Line PS O-4

0.00

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 17,175Empl. Force 91

1814.39

Empl. Force 236.22M-5L

Existing Storage

11.35

Res. Population

Max.Day (ML/D)

17.9216.98

Pressure ZoneMax.Day (ML/D)

0.0% Peak Hr. (ML/D)

Firm Capacity

Appleby Res

-----

Appleby PS - B-3

0.00

Emerg. 2.73

0.93

203.308.22Equal.

8.84

B4

ML/D

4.55

Peak Hr. (ML/D)Max.Day (ML/D)

Empl. ForceTotal

Tyandaga Res

2.8814.39

0.84

Res. Population

TWL

9,563

236.22

785.60

Fire 3.30Equal. 8.22

2.88

Max.Day (ML/D)

4,604

32.86

Res. Population

Empl. Force

Existing Storage

Equal.TWL 167.93

Total 13.63

7.60B3

Existing Storage 17.5

Total

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 51.89

Max.Day (ML/D)

O-3

Firm CapacityInstalled Capacity 80.16

55.16

2.84

198.03

Fire 3.30

0.00

1.53

16.98

ML/D

-----

Empl. Force 03.48

43.20 ML/D

M-4L/O-4

74.450.00

Firm Capacity 0.00Installed Capacity

5.63

Pressure Zone

47.15

Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps

Required Pumping Capacity

75.00

18.86

Firm Capacity32Installed Capacity Installed Capacity

Firm Capacity 1.96Installed Capacity 5.26

Pressure Zone

B-415.0%

200.20Pressure Zone

Existing Storage

3.30

Bailey Res

Equal.

Headon ResTWL 200.20

4.76

85.0%

ML/D

Moore Res

32

14.39

Emerg.

19.19

Emerg.

0.09

40.0%

M5L

92616.98

Pressure Zone O3

105.00

Required Pumping Capacity

Bailie PS B-4

4.859.20

2.88

Required Pumping Capacity

3.30

Firm Capacity

Existing Storage

Fire

Total

Firm Capacity

17.6

TWL

16,462

8.89

0.00Res. Population 27,877M-4L & O-4Combined Pressure Zone

198.03Equal.

Emerg.

0.00 ML/D

8.223.30

M4L

Max.Day (ML/D)

Total

Max.Day (ML/D)

10,702

Peak Hr. (ML/D)

236.00

Emerg.

37.62

43.20

28.29

Empl. Force

Peak Hr. (ML/D)

Res. PopulationEmpl. Force 835

59.40

Pressure ZoneRes. Population

TWL

267.00

Kitchen O3 Pumps

Required Pumping Capacity

ML/D

Firm Capacity 75.00

Fire

47,659

1 HGLmML

B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL

1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 38%ML ML

Firm Capacity 102.26154.28

Required Pumping Capacity

69.88

Pressure Zone

26,037

ML/D

Davis Rd O-2

4.22

0.00

4.85

0.00

B-294.0%

B-2

Empl. Force

Peak Hr. (ML/D)

B-1A

13.62

Brant St. PS B-3

Required Pumping Capacity

136.50

Firm Capacity 0.00

Installed Capacity

36.34

ML/D

59.33

Existing StorageTotal

Waterdown PS

Required Pumping Capacity

ML/D

Installed Capacity

Waterdown ResTWL

Emerg.

4.58

Fire

7.5 Max.Day (ML/D) 8.63

Equal.140.21

0.59Firm Capacity 2.29

B-30.0%

B-30.93

3.29

10.0%

1.36

2.16

6.82Res. Population

Total

Pressure Zone B1A140.21

Fire3.30Equal.

Existing Storage10,9072,194

Pressure Zone O2A

100.0%3.48

O-2A3.481,127

3.48

5.49Max.Day (ML/D)

Empl. Force39.31

Peak Hr. (ML/D)

180.00

Res. Population 4,770

O-2

O2

2.74

Fire

Peak Hr. (ML/D)

17

Res. Population

Existing Storage

0.00

O-2

TotalTWL

Max.Day (ML/D)

13.68

7.64

TWLKitchen Res

0.00

9.22

128.016

135.00

Emerg.

ML/D

19,504Res. Population

1.82 FireEmerg.Total

ML/D

22,432Empl. Force

B2

B-2

Required Pumping Capacity

Kingsway BPS

Existing Storage

9.21

Installed CapacityFirm Capacity

Installed Capacity14.21

135.03

2.7313.63Total

Emerg.

0.59

46.00

Brant St Res

100.0%

28.58

Fire 3.30Equal.

11.5

30.00

ML/D

13.62

3.96

0.00

0.00

15.34135.03

Washburn ResTWL

13.5

3.30

23.30Existing Storage

4.66

Firm Capacity 0.00

0.00

Valve

Empl. Force30.56

167.04

109.20

ML/D

8.81

Firm Capacity

Installed Capacity

Required Pumping Capacity

Equal.

Washburn PS B-2

Pressure Zone

6.0%

37.38 29.58

0.00

B-390.0%

29.58

0.0%

167.707.60

TWL

6.48

21.45

69.87

53.72Empl. Force

135.03Pressure Zone

Max.Day (ML/D)

16.15

Installed Capacity

Installed Capacity

B-2 BPS

Required Pumping Capacity

Firm Capacity

-----

0.0%

0.00

100.0%

Washburn PS B-3

Required Pumping Capacity

3.30

71.49

4015.643.13

Equal.

0.00

20,062

48.25

30.56

36.86

54,513O1

4,893

3.30

Res. Population37.6050.04

Emerg.McCraney Res

45%

55%

HGL

m

HGL MLML

MLMLML

####

96.8861.36

85,604Res. Population7,552

135.03Pressure Zone

106.40

Peak Hr. (ML/D)

66.96

3.30

Required Pumping Capacity

,p

179.22263.0

0.25

B-1B

Empl. Force

Max.Day (ML/D)

B-1100.0%61.36

Emerg.

Mount Forest Res

Peak Hr. (ML/D)

0.25

Max.Day (ML/D) 0.16

Pressure Zone Fire

Empl. Force 123149

Total

Burlington WPP

Res. Population

B1B

4.66

Firm Capacity126.64

9.37

g g

Equal.

126.64

Firm Capacity 2.31Installed Capacity

TWL

7.55

100.0%

30.4048.00

0.16

Max.Day (ML/D)Peak Hr. (ML/D)

117.85

11.45

Burloak WPP

55.00

g g

Installed Capacity 343.7

ML/D

Firm Capacity

39.44

B1

2.08

Required Pumping Capacity

Burlington WPP

5.6Existing Storage23.30

2.08 ML/D

4.21

15.34

Mount Forest PS

y ( )

Criteria Dropped by:

Required Pumping Capacity

90.59 ML/D

Firm Capacity 109.00152.73Installed Capacity

58.21

100.0%36.86

O-1

Oakville WPP

Oakville WPP

Installed Capacity -----

Required Pumping Capacity

Peak Hr. (ML/D)50.04

48.2 ML/D

Burloak WPP

48.20

2011SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

Figure 6.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2011

Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

29/07/2011

5 5

m m

ML MLML ML

ML MLML ML

ML ML

4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML

ML ML ML

0.09 M-5L Installed Capacity -----Tyandaga. PS B-4 5.0%

Firm Capacity 30.00

Required Pumping Capacity 8.57

ML/D Existing Storage 5.68 Existing Storage 30.00

Total 5.89 Max.Day (ML/D) 0.18 Res. Population 6.18 Required Pumping Capacity

Existing Storage 4.55 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.28 8.58

Total 10.66 Total 11.12

Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.18 Empl. Force 14 Milton Transfer M5T 4th Line M5L Pumps Emerg.

Fire 3.30 Res. Population 300 Fire 2.702.13 Emerg. 2.22

Equal. 1.41 Pressure Zone B5 Equal. 5.83 Equal. 5.60

0.28Beaufort Res Zone 4 ET Milton M4L

TWL 236.22 292.22 TWL 236.22 TWL 236.22

0.28 ML/D

Firm Capacity 8.80 B-5Installed Capacity ----- 100.0%

Existing Storage 6.83 Existing Storage 20.00

Beaufort PS B-5

Required Pumping Capacity

Emerg. 3.82 Emerg. 3.82Total 19.10 Total 12.27

Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30

Milton ET Milton Z5 Res

TWL 267.00 TWL 267.00

Burlington Water Distribution System Oakville Water Distribution System

2016 2016

June 2011 Planning Data June 2011 Planning Data

Equal. 11.98 Equal. 11.98

2016SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

M5L 30%HGL

3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML

m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML

ML

HGL

m

MLMLML 2ML mML ML

MLMLML

HGL ML

HGL

O3 48%

2 2m m

HGL ML MLML MLML ML

ML ML

ML MLPeak Hr. (ML/D) 52.65 Installed Capacity 105.00 Installed Capacity 100.00 Installed Capacity 80.16

32 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity

ML/D 29.45 ML/D

Max.Day (ML/D) 33.34 Existing Storage 17.50 Existing Storage 55.16

Empl. Force 4,769 Total 14.55 Total 13.73 45.52 ML/D 35.68

26.02 Eighth Line BPS O-3

Res. Population 50,876 Emerg. 2.91 Emerg. 2.75 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

Pressure Zone B3 Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps Kitchen O3 Pumps 26.02

0.92 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 82.18Bailie Res Appleby Res 9.65

O-3 O-3200.20 Equal. 8.34 Equal. 7.69 50.0%

TWL 167.93 TWL 167.7050.0%

100.0% 32.93 Max.Day (ML/D) 52.05B2, B3A, B5A Installed Capacity 19.19 Installed Capacity ----- Empl. Force

Firm Capacity 9.20 Firm Capacity 30.00 Res. Population 67,016 3.424,108 11.72

198.03

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 1.45 4.89 ML/D 29.60 ML/D Pressure Zone O3

Appleby PS - B-3 42.57Max.Day (ML/D) 0.92 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

Pressure Zone B2, B3A, B5A

Res. Population 1,714Empl. Force 0 Bailie PS B-4

0.09 Total 11.41277.67 22.93 Existing Storage 17.6

Equal. 5.83Fire 3.30

Emerg. 2.28

Max.Day (ML/D) 22.40 Eighth Line ResPeak Hr. (ML/D) 35.36 TWL 167.64

4.80 Res. Population 35,637 Firm Capacity 100.00Empl. Force 2,430 Installed Capacity 125.00

43.73

85.0% Pressure Zone M4L 42.58 ML/D Installed Capacity 64.45

B-4 236.00 Required Pumping Capacity 36.57 9.14 Firm Capacity

Existing Storage 2.0 NO M4L Pumps 80.0% 20.0% 11.72 ML/D Peak Hr. (ML/D) 36.82

Total 4.41 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 8.92 M-4L/O-4 M-4L/O-4 Required Pumping Capacity Max.Day (ML/D) 23.32

72.18 Res. Population 35,472Emerg. 0.88 Max.Day (ML/D) 5.65 45.52 Eighth Line PS O-4

Existing Storage 18 95.0% Existing Storage 32 Peak Hr. (ML/D)Empl. Force 860

Fire 3.30 Existing Storage 9.05 Empl. Force 859,617 Total 14.55

Empl. Force 3,290 236.22Equal. 0.23 Total 14.55 Res. Population Max.Day (ML/D) 45.72 Pressure Zone O4M-5L Total 20.39

Waterdown ET Fire 3.30 236.22 Fire 3.30 2.57TWL 277.67 Emerg. 2.91 Pressure Zone B4 Emerg. 2.91 Emerg.

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 75.65 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 71,1094.08 6.00

20,268 TWL 198.03 236.00Equal. 8.34 Equal. 8.34 Max.Day (ML/D) 47.91TWL 203.30 0.85 TWL 200.20 Empl. Force

Equal. 13.01 Combined Pressure Zone M-4L & O-4

2.57 0.00Tyandaga Res 15.0% Headon Res Res. Population 56,918 Moore Res

Installed Capacity 5.26 267.00B-4 Pressure Zone M5L

Firm Capacity 1.96

0.94 ML/D 8.57

Total 4.41Existing Storage 4.5

North Aldershot Res

TWL

Equal. 0.23Fire 3.30

Emerg. 0.88

1 HGLmML

B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL

1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 45%ML ML Max.Day (ML/D) 37.74 80.27Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 22,603 Existing Storage 27.00

Total 13.73 Res. Population 19,620 Total 23.71 Empl. Force 4,977

Pressure Zone O1Emerg. 2.75 Pressure Zone B2 Emerg. 4.74 56.84 11.74

Fire 3.30 1.23 167.70 Fire 3.30Res. Population 55,624

Equal. 7.69 4.0% Equal. 15.67 135.03TWL 135.03 B-2 TWL 135.03 22.84

71.0% 25.0% 24.36 -12.629.75 Brant St Res 21.83 7.69 Washburn Res

Firm Capacity 30.00Installed Capacity 46.00

B-2 B-2

Installed Capacity 92.00 Installed Capacity ----- 67.65

Firm Capacity 50.00 6.69

14.86 ML/D Installed Capacity 13.08 Installed Capacity 145.60

ML/D 22.85 ML/D

Required Pumping Capacity Firm Capacity 6.60 Firm Capacity 109.20 Firm Capacity 60.00

Kingsway BPS 4.27 ML/D 50.76 ML/D 33.34

154.2813.94 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

100.0% Brant St. PS B-3 Washburn PS B-2 Washburn PS B-3 B-2 BPS Installed Capacity

2.91 O-2 O-2

67.66 ML/D

B-1A Firm Capacity 102.26

28.94 8.48 2.99 30.20 Required Pumping Capacity

10.00 81.20 9.0% 91.0% Davis Rd O-2

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 52.41

Res. Population 22,068Empl. Force 27,027

Max.Day (ML/D) 33.19

0.92

167.04Peak Hr. (ML/D) 13.94 21.12 Pressure Zone O2

Existing Storage 7.5 Max.Day (ML/D) 8.83 Existing Storage 17

ValveTotal 6.88 Empl. Force 2,248 Total 14.50

Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.38 Res. Population 11,105 Emerg. 2.90

8.30 3.42 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 5.39Fire 3.30 Pressure Zone B1A Existing Storage 40

Equal. 2.21 140.21 Total 15.92 Equal.

1,127TWL 140.21 Emerg. 3.18 TWL 128.016 100.0% Max.Day (ML/D) 3.42Waterdown Res Fire 3.30 McCraney Res O-2A Empl. Force

180.00TWL 135.00 Pressure Zone O2A

Equal. 9.44 41.16 Res. Population 4,651

Firm Capacity 4.79 3.42Installed Capacity ----- Kitchen Res

4.89 29.60

0.92 ML/D 3.33 23.34 6.67

Waterdown PS B-3 B-3 B-3Required Pumping Capacity 0.94 10.0% 70.0% 20.0%

46%

54%

HGL

m

HGL MLML

MLMLML

####Criteria Dropped by:

Burloak WPP Oakville WPP

2.58

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27

Burlington WPP

Empl. Force 136 Total 23.71Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Existing Storage 11.00

Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity 152.73

Res. Population 150 Emerg. 4.74

Pressure Zone B1B Fire 3.30 Installed Capacity 343.75 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 98.9762.68

ML/D 118.02 ML/D

126.64 Equal. 15.67 Firm Capacity 263.00 Max.Day (ML/D) Firm Capacity 130.00Firm Capacity 55.00

TWL 126.64 201.34 ML/D Empl. Force 8,658 49.4

Burloak WPP Oakville WPP

0.27 Mount Forest Res Required Pumping Capacity 62.68 Res. Population 86,110100.0% 9.92 Burlington WPP 100.0% Pressure Zone B1

Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

Installed Capacity 7.55 138.66B-1B B-1 135.03

Required Pumping Capacity

0.17 2.59 ML/D

Firm Capacity 2.31

O-1100.0%

Mount Forest PS 12.50 126.16 42.05 37.74

49.37

4.27 84.11

y ( )Max.Day (ML/D) 30.74 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 59.59

g g p , g g

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 48.54 79.68

2016SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

Figure 7.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2016

Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

29/07/2011

5 5 6

m m m HGL

ML ML ML

ML ML ML

ML ML MLML ML ML

ML ML ML

4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML

ML ML ML

0.09 M-5L Installed Capacity

Existing Storage 30.00

Firm Capacity 30.00

Required Pumping Capacity 12.61

Existing Storage 4.55 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27 12.62 ML/D Existing Storage

----Tyandaga. PS B-4 10.0%

Emerg. 3.40Total 5.91 Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Res. Population 6.88 Required Pumping Capacity Total 14.80 Total 17.01

Emerg. 1.18 Empl. Force 15 Milton Transfer M5T 4th Line M5L Pumps Emerg. 2.96

Equal. 10.31Fire 3.30 Res. Population 294 Fire 2.70 Fire

Equal. 1.43 Pressure Zone B5 Equal.3.30

Milton M4LTWL 236.22 292.22 TWL 236.22 TWL 236.22

Installed Capacity ---- 100.0%0.27

Beaufort Res Zone 4 ET

20.00

Firm Capacity 8.80 B-5 Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity -----

0.28 ML/D 6.88 Firm Capacity 0.00 Firm Capacity

6.89 ML/D 8.67 ML/D

G-6L100.0%

8.665th Sideroad 5L PS 5th Sideroad 6L PS

Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

8.66

Existing Storage 6.83 Existing Storage 20.00 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 16.23

Total 22.05 Total 15.22 Max.Day (ML/D)

296

Equal. 14.34 Equal. 14.34 Pressure Zone

Emerg. 4.41 Emerg. 4.41 Empl. Force 103

G6L

Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 796

2021 2021

June 2011 Planning Data June 2011 Planning Data

Milton ET Milton Z5 Res

Burlington Water Distribution System Oakville Water Distribution System

TWL 267.00 TWL 267.00

Georgetown 6L Res

TWL 296.00

Equal. 2.17

Fire 3.30

Emerg. 1.37Total 6.83

Existing Storage 0.00

Required Pumping Capacity 12.0%

Beaufort PS B-5 M-5L

9.14

5.68

2021SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

Figure 8.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2021

M5L 30%HGL

3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML

m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML

ML

HGL

m

MLMLML 2ML mML ML

MLMLML

HGL ML

HGL

O3 30%

2 2m m

HGL ML MLML MLML ML

ML ML

ML MLPeak Hr. (ML/D) 53.75 Installed Capacity 105.00 Installed Capacity 100.00 Installed Capacity 80.16

32 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity

ML/D 46.89 ML/D

Max.Day (ML/D) 34.04 Existing Storage 17.50 Existing Storage 55.16

Empl. Force 4,858 Total 14.76 Total 13.91 44.73 ML/D 60.63

43.52 Eighth Line BPS O-3

Res. Population 51,445 Emerg. 2.95 Emerg. 2.78 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

Pressure Zone B3 Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps Kitchen O3 Pumps 10.88

1.20 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 85.90Bailie Res Appleby Res 49.74

O-3 O-3200.20 Equal. 8.51 Equal. 7.83 20.0%

TWL 167.93 TWL 167.7080.0%

100.0% 25.98 Max.Day (ML/D) 54.41B2, B3A, B5A Installed Capacity 19.19 Installed Capacity ----- Empl. Force

Firm Capacity 9.20 Firm Capacity 30.00 Res. Population 67,101 3.367,367 30.23

198.03

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 1.89 4.94 ML/D 22.80 ML/D Pressure Zone O3

Appleby PS - B-3 75.73Max.Day (ML/D) 1.20 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

Pressure Zone B2, B3A, B5A

Res. Population 2,188Empl. Force 0 Bailie PS B-4

0.09 Total 15.55277.67 15.98 Existing Storage 17.6

Equal. 9.14Fire 3.30

Emerg. 3.11

Max.Day (ML/D) 41.22 Eighth Line ResPeak Hr. (ML/D) 65.09 TWL 167.64

4.85 Res. Population 64,068 Firm Capacity 100.00Empl. Force 2,981 Installed Capacity 125.00

43.73

85.0% Pressure Zone M4L 75.73 ML/D Installed Capacity 64.45

B-4 236.00 Required Pumping Capacity 66.90 10.89 Firm Capacity

Existing Storage 2.0 NO M4L Pumps 86.0% 14.0% 30.24 ML/D Peak Hr. (ML/D) 57.73

Total 4.50 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 9.01 M-4L/O-4 M-4L/O-4 Required Pumping Capacity Max.Day (ML/D) 36.56

122.82 Res. Population 52,647Emerg. 0.90 Max.Day (ML/D) 5.71 44.73 Eighth Line PS O-4

Existing Storage 18 78.0% Existing Storage 32 Peak Hr. (ML/D)Empl. Force 4,138

Fire 3.30 Existing Storage 9.05 Empl. Force 889,701 Total 14.76

Empl. Force 7,119 236.22Equal. 0.30 Total 14.76 Res. Population Max.Day (ML/D) 77.79 Pressure Zone O4M-5L Total 21.13

Waterdown ET Fire 3.30 236.22 Fire 3.30 19.34TWL 277.67 Emerg. 2.95 Pressure Zone B4 Emerg. 2.95 Emerg.

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 90.55 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 116,7164.23 8.83

24,245 TWL 198.03 236.00Equal. 8.51 Equal. 8.51 Max.Day (ML/D) 57.35TWL 203.30 0.86 TWL 200.20 Empl. Force

Equal. 13.60 Combined Pressure Zone M-4L & O-4

1.96

3.78 15.56Tyandaga Res 15.0% Headon Res Res. Population 64,006 Moore Res

Installed Capacity 5.26 267.00B-4 Pressure Zone M5L

q p g p y

0.95 ML/D 12.61

North Aldershot Res

TWL

Equal. 0.30Fire 3.30

Emerg. 0.90Total 4.50

Existing Storage 4.5

Firm Capacity

1 HGLmML

B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL

1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 31%ML ML

Res. Population 57,959

154.28Installed Capacity

Max.Day (ML/D) 39.65 76.64Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 22,887 Existing Storage 27.00Total 13.91 Res. Population 19,902 Total 24.31 Empl. Force 5,719

Pressure Zone O1Emerg. 2.78 Pressure Zone B2 Emerg. 4.86 73.75 54.95

Fire 3.30 1.25 167.70 Fire 3.30Equal. 7.83 4.0% Equal. 16.15 135.03TWL 135.03 B-2 TWL 135.03 28.25

71.0% 25.0% 31.61 23.3410.26 Brant St Res 22.24 7.83 Washburn Res

Firm Capacity 30.00Installed Capacity 46.00

B-2 B-2

Installed Capacity 92.00 Installed Capacity ----- 99.98

Firm Capacity 50.00 13.63

15.51 ML/D Installed Capacity 13.08 Installed Capacity 136.50

ML/D 28.26 ML/D

Required Pumping Capacity Firm Capacity 6.60 Firm Capacity 109.20 Firm Capacity 60.00

Kingsway BPS 4.35 ML/D 46.45 ML/D 33.83

14.31 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

100.0% Brant St. PS B-3 Washburn PS B-2 Washburn PS B-3 B-2 BPS

3.26 O-2 O-2

99.99 ML/D

B-1A Firm Capacity 102.26

24.21 6.79 4.38 32.12 Required Pumping Capacity

10.00 105.36 12.0% 88.0% Davis Rd O-2

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 57.63

Res. Population 26,684Empl. Force 27,062

Max.Day (ML/D) 36.50

1.20

167.04Peak Hr. (ML/D) 14.31 16.01 Pressure Zone O2

Existing Storage 15.00 Max.Day (ML/D) 9.06 Existing Storage 17

ValveTotal 6.96 Empl. Force 2,254 Total 15.53

Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.39 Res. Population 11,411 Emerg. 3.11

9.12 3.36 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 5.30Fire 3.30 Pressure Zone B1A Existing Storage 40

Equal. 2.27 140.21 Total 16.51 Equal.

1,130TWL 140.21 Emerg. 3.30 TWL 128.016 100.0% Max.Day (ML/D) 3.36Waterdown Res Fire 3.30 McCraney Res O-2A Empl. Force

180.00TWL 135.00 Pressure Zone O2A

Equal. 9.91 77.11 Res. Population 4,544

Firm Capacity 4.79 3.36Installed Capacity ----- Kitchen Res

4.94 22.80

1.20 ML/D 3.40 23.83 6.81

Waterdown PS B-3 B-3 B-3Required Pumping Capacity 0.94 10.0% 70.0% 20.0%

ML ML

17%

83%

HGL

m

HGL MLML

MLMLML

####Criteria Dropped by:

Burloak WPP Oakville WPP

Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity 152.73

130.27

2.34

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27

Burlington WPP

Empl. Force 137 Total 24.31Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Existing Storage 11.00

Res. Population 149 Emerg. 4.86

Firm Capacity 130.00Pressure Zone B1B Fire 3.30 Installed Capacity 343.75 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 101.99

64.60 Firm Capacity 165.00126.64 Equal. 16.15 Firm Capacity 263.00 Max.Day (ML/D)

130.3 ML/D 116.29 ML/DTWL 126.64 184.33 ML/D Empl. Force 8,691

Oakville WPP

0.27 Mount Forest Res Required Pumping Capacity 64.60 Res. Population 87,977 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

100.0% 10.43 Burlington WPP 100.0% Pressure Zone B1 Burloak WPP

Installed Capacity 7.55 119.73B-1B B-1 135.03

Required Pumping Capacity

0.17 2.34 ML/D

Firm Capacity 2.31

O-1100.0%

Mount Forest PS 12.77 106.96 26.68 39.65

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 49.45 102.004.35 80.28

Max.Day (ML/D) 39.65 76.64Max.Day (ML/D) 31.32 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 62.60

Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 22,887 Existing Storage 27.00

2021SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

Figure 8.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2021

Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

29/07/2011

5 5 6

m m m HGL

ML ML ML

ML ML ML

ML ML MLML ML ML

ML ML ML

4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML

ML ML ML

0.08 M-5L Installed Capacity

Existing Storage 50.00

Firm Capacity 30.00

Required Pumping Capacity 14.14

Existing Storage 4.55 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27 14.14 ML/D Existing Storage

----Tyandaga. PS B-4 10.0%

Emerg. 4.62Total 5.91 Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Res. Population 7.45 Required Pumping Capacity Total 16.12 Total 23.12

Emerg. 1.18 Empl. Force 15 Milton Transfer M5T 4th Line M5L Pumps Emerg. 3.22

Equal. 15.20Fire 3.30 Res. Population 288 Fire 2.70 Fire

Equal. 1.43 Pressure Zone B5 Equal.3.30

Milton M4LTWL 236.22 292.22 TWL 236.22 TWL 236.22

Installed Capacity ----- 100.0%0.27

Beaufort Res Zone 4 ET

20.00

Firm Capacity 8.80 B-5 Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity -----

0.27 ML/D 8.02 Firm Capacity 20.00 Firm Capacity

8.03 ML/D 15.70 ML/D

G-6L100.0%

15.695th Sideroad 5L PS 5th Sideroad 6L PS

Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

15.69

Existing Storage 6.83 Existing Storage 30.00 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 27.34

Total 25.02 Total 18.19 Max.Day (ML/D)

296

Equal. 16.71 Equal. 16.71 Pressure Zone

Emerg. 5.00 Emerg. 5.00 Empl. Force 104

G6L

Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 11,869

2026 2026

June 2011 Planning Data June 2011 Planning Data

Milton ET Milton Z5 Res

Burlington Water Distribution System Oakville Water Distribution System

TWL 267.00 TWL 267.00

Georgetown 6L Res

TWL 296.00

Equal. 3.92

Fire 3.30

Emerg. 1.81Total 9.03

Existing Storage 20.00

Required Pumping Capacity 12.0%

Beaufort PS B-5 M-5L

10.19

5.68

2026SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

Figure 9.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2026

M5L 30%HGL

3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML

m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML

ML

HGL

m

MLMLML 2ML mML ML

MLMLML

HGL ML

HGL

O3 31%

2 2m m

HGL ML MLML MLML ML

ML ML

ML MLPeak Hr. (ML/D) 53.92 Installed Capacity 105.00 Installed Capacity 100.00 Installed Capacity 80.16

32 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity

ML/D 46.76 ML/D

Max.Day (ML/D) 34.15 Existing Storage 17.50 Existing Storage 55.16

Empl. Force 4,955 Total 14.80 Total 13.96 52.15 ML/D 74.59

43.44 Eighth Line BPS O-3

Res. Population 51,429 Emerg. 2.96 Emerg. 2.79 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

Pressure Zone B3 Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps Kitchen O3 Pumps 10.86

1.19 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 85.74Bailie Res Appleby Res 63.73

O-3 O-3200.20 Equal. 8.54 Equal. 7.87 20.0%

TWL 167.93 TWL 167.7080.0%

100.0% 33.51 Max.Day (ML/D) 54.30B2, B3A, B5A Installed Capacity 19.19 Installed Capacity ----- Empl. Force

Firm Capacity 9.20 Firm Capacity 30.00 Res. Population 66,977 3.317,370 42.19

198.03

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 1.88 4.94 ML/D 30.34 ML/D Pressure Zone O3

Appleby PS - B-3 97.24Max.Day (ML/D) 1.19 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

Pressure Zone B2, B3A, B5A

Res. Population 2,172Empl. Force 0 Bailie PS B-4

0.08 Total 16.87277.67 23.51 Existing Storage 17.6

Equal. 10.19Fire 3.30

Emerg. 3.37

Max.Day (ML/D) 60.79 Eighth Line ResPeak Hr. (ML/D) 95.98 TWL 167.64

4.85 Res. Population 93,173 Firm Capacity 140.00Empl. Force 3,378 Installed Capacity -----

43.73

85.0% Pressure Zone M4L 97.24 ML/D Installed Capacity 64.45

B-4 236.00 Required Pumping Capacity 87.34 14.22 Firm Capacity

Existing Storage 2.0 NO M4L Pumps 86.0% 14.0% 42.19 ML/D Peak Hr. (ML/D) 64.38

Total 4.50 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 9.01 M-4L/O-4 M-4L/O-4 Required Pumping Capacity Max.Day (ML/D) 40.77

160.36 Res. Population 58,866Emerg. 0.90 Max.Day (ML/D) 5.70 52.15 Eighth Line PS O-4

Existing Storage 18 78.0% Existing Storage 32 Peak Hr. (ML/D)Empl. Force 4,811

Fire 3.30 Existing Storage 9.05 Empl. Force 979,677 Total 14.80

Empl. Force 8,189 236.22Equal. 0.30 Total 14.80 Res. Population Max.Day (ML/D) 101.56 Pressure Zone O4M-5L Total 21.10

Waterdown ET Fire 3.30 236.22 Fire 3.30 27.97TWL 277.67 Emerg. 2.96 Pressure Zone B4 Emerg. 2.96 Emerg.

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 105.56 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 152,0394.22 9.90

34,233 TWL 198.03 236.00Equal. 8.54 Equal. 8.54 Max.Day (ML/D) 66.85TWL 203.30 0.86 TWL 200.20 Empl. Force

Equal. 13.58 Combined Pressure Zone M-4L & O-4

1.96

4.24 23.73Tyandaga Res 15.0% Headon Res Res. Population 68,152 Moore Res

Installed Capacity 5.26 267.00B-4 Pressure Zone M5L

q p g p y

0.95 ML/D 14.14

North Aldershot Res

TWL

Equal. 0.30Fire 3.30

Emerg. 0.90Total 4.50

Existing Storage 4.5

Firm Capacity

1 HGLmML

B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL

1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 25%ML ML Max.Day (ML/D) 40.91 74.92Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 23,030 Existing Storage 27.00

Total 13.96 Res. Population 19,939 Total 25.04 Empl. Force 5,776

Pressure Zone O1Emerg. 2.79 Pressure Zone B2 Emerg. 5.01 88.72 63.09

Fire 3.30 0.94 167.70 Fire 3.30Res. Population 59,988

Equal. 7.87 3.0% Equal. 16.73 135.03TWL 135.03 B-2 TWL 135.03 44.75

72.0% 25.0% 38.02 25.0710.27 Brant St Res 22.67 7.87 Washburn Res

Firm Capacity 30.00Installed Capacity 46.00

B-2 B-2

Installed Capacity 92.00 Installed Capacity ----- 99.99

Firm Capacity 50.00 28.20

15.52 ML/D Installed Capacity 13.08 Installed Capacity 136.50

ML/D 44.75 ML/D

Required Pumping Capacity Firm Capacity 6.60 Firm Capacity 109.20 Firm Capacity 60.00

Kingsway BPS 4.36 ML/D 52.58 ML/D 33.90

154.2814.33 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

100.0% Brant St. PS B-3 Washburn PS B-2 Washburn PS B-3 B-2 BPS Installed Capacity

3.31 O-2 O-2

99.99 ML/D

B-1A Firm Capacity 102.26

29.91 8.68 8.63 30.61 Required Pumping Capacity

10.00 126.74 22.0% 78.0% Davis Rd O-2

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 61.96

Res. Population 30,878Empl. Force 27,115

Max.Day (ML/D) 39.24

1.19

167.04Peak Hr. (ML/D) 14.33 21.66 Pressure Zone O2

Existing Storage 15.00 Max.Day (ML/D) 9.08 Existing Storage 17

ValveTotal 6.96 Empl. Force 2,284 Total 16.39

Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.39 Res. Population 11,379 Emerg. 3.28

9.81 3.31 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 5.23Fire 3.30 Pressure Zone B1A Existing Storage 40

Equal. 2.27 140.21 Total 16.91 Equal.

1,133TWL 140.21 Emerg. 3.38 TWL 128.016 100.0% Max.Day (ML/D) 3.31Waterdown Res Fire 3.30 McCraney Res O-2A Empl. Force

180.00TWL 135.00 Pressure Zone O2A

Equal. 10.23 88.95 Res. Population 4,466

Firm Capacity 4.79 3.31Installed Capacity ----- Kitchen Res

4.93 30.34

1.19 ML/D 3.41 23.90 6.83

Waterdown PS B-3 B-3 B-3Required Pumping Capacity 0.94 10.0% 70.0% 20.0%

ML ML

19%

81%

HGL

m

HGL MLML

MLMLML

####Criteria Dropped by:

Burloak WPP Oakville WPP

1.99

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.27

Burlington WPP

Installed Capacity 152.73

Res. Population 145 Emerg. 5.01Empl. Force 142 Total 25.04

Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Existing Storage 11.00

Firm Capacity 130.00Pressure Zone B1B Fire 3.30 Installed Capacity 343.75 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 105.67

66.93 Firm Capacity 165.00126.64 Equal. 16.73 Firm Capacity 263.00 Max.Day (ML/D)Installed Capacity -----

159.2 ML/D 115.83 ML/DTWL 126.64 203.18 ML/D Empl. Force 8,8360.27 Mount Forest Res Required Pumping Capacity 66.93 Res. Population 91,417 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

100.0% 10.44 Burlington WPP 100.0% Pressure Zone B1 Burloak WPP Oakville WPP

Installed Capacity 7.55 136.25B-1B B-1 135.03

Required Pumping Capacity

0.17 1.99 ML/D

Firm Capacity 2.31

O-1100.0%

Mount Forest PS 12.42 123.83 37.34 40.91

159.21

4.35 86.48

Max.Day (ML/D) 40.91 74.92Max.Day (ML/D) 31.48 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 64.59

Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 23,030 Existing Storage 27.00

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 49.71 133.46

2026SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

Figure 9.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2026

Halton Region 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

29/07/2011

5 5 6

m m m HGL

ML ML ML

ML ML ML

ML ML MLML ML ML

ML ML ML

4 4 4m HGL m mML ML MLML ML MLML ML MLML ML ML

ML ML ML

0.08 M-5L Installed Capacity

5.68 Existing Storage 50.00

Firm Capacity 30.00

Required Pumping Capacity 13.80

Existing Storage 4.55 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.26 13.80 ML/D Existing Storage

----Tyandaga. PS B-4 8.0%

Emerg. 5.95Total 5.95 Max.Day (ML/D) 0.17 Res. Population 7.72 Required Pumping Capacity Total 17.02 Total 29.76

Emerg. 1.19 Empl. Force 15 Milton Transfer M5T 4th Line M5L Pumps Emerg. 3.40

10.92 Equal. 20.51Fire 3.30 Res. Population 284 Fire 2.70 Fire

Equal. 1.46 Pressure Zone B5 Equal.3.30

Milton M4LTWL 236.22 292.22 TWL 236.22 TWL 236.22

Installed Capacity 0.00 100.0%0.26

Beaufort Res Zone 4 ET

20.00

Firm Capacity 8.80 B-5 Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity -----

0.27 ML/D 9.12 Firm Capacity 20.00 Firm Capacity

Required Pumping Capacity 12.0% 9.12 ML/D 20.76 ML/D

G-6L100.0%

20.755th Sideroad 5L PS 5th Sideroad 6L PS

Beaufort PS B-5 M-5L Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

30.00 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 35.35

Total 27.87 Total 21.04 Max.Day (ML/D)Empl. Force 108

Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 22,633

20.75

Burlington Water Distribution System Oakville Water Distribution System

2031 2031

June 2011 Planning Data June 2011 Planning Data

296

Equal. 19.00 Equal. 19.00 Pressure Zone G6L

Milton ET Milton Z5 Res

TWL 267.00 TWL 267.00

Georgetown 6L Res

TWL 296.00

Equal. 5.19

Fire 3.30

Emerg. 2.12Total 10.61

Existing Storage 20.00

Emerg. 5.57 Emerg. 5.57

Existing Storage 6.83 Existing Storage

2031SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

Figure 10.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2031

M5L 33%HGL

3 3 3m m m HGLML ML MLML HGL ML ML

m ML ML ML HGLML ML ML MLML ML ML MLMLML

ML

HGL

m

MLMLML 2ML mML ML

MLMLML

HGL ML

HGL

O3 22%

2 2m m

HGL ML MLML MLML ML

ML ML

ML MLPeak Hr. (ML/D) 55.27 Installed Capacity 105.00 Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity 80.16

32 Firm Capacity 75.00 Firm Capacity 155.00 Firm Capacity

ML/D 42.34 ML/D

Max.Day (ML/D) 35.00 Existing Storage 17.50 Existing Storage 55.16

Empl. Force 5,069 Total 15.06 Total 14.11 60.80 ML/D 111.44

39.02 Eighth Line BPS O-3

Res. Population 52,460 Emerg. 3.01 Emerg. 2.82 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

Pressure Zone B3 Fire 3.30 Fire 3.30 Kitchen M5L Pumps Kitchen O3 Pumps 16.72

1.19 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 88.02Bailie Res Appleby Res 94.72

O-3 O-3200.20 Equal. 8.75 Equal. 7.99 30.0%

TWL 167.93 TWL 167.7070.0%

100.0% 31.43 Max.Day (ML/D) 55.74B2, B3A, B5A Installed Capacity 19.19 Installed Capacity ----- Empl. Force

Firm Capacity 9.20 Firm Capacity 30.00 Res. Population 68,855 3.327,486 43.23

198.03

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 1.88 5.04 ML/D 28.69 ML/D Pressure Zone O3

Appleby PS - B-3 126.15Max.Day (ML/D) 1.19 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

Pressure Zone B2, B3A, B5A

Res. Population 2,169Empl. Force 0 Bailie PS B-4

0.08 Total 17.77277.67 23.43 Existing Storage 17.6

Equal. 10.92Fire 3.30

Emerg. 3.55

Max.Day (ML/D) 82.03 Eighth Line ResPeak Hr. (ML/D) 129.52 TWL 167.64

4.95 Res. Population 119,474 Firm Capacity 140.00Empl. Force 8,465 Installed Capacity -----

43.73

85.0% Pressure Zone M4L 126.15 ML/D Installed Capacity 64.45

B-4 236.00 Required Pumping Capacity 116.90 8.80 Firm Capacity

Existing Storage 2.0 NO M4L Pumps 93.0% 7.0% 43.24 ML/D Peak Hr. (ML/D) 68.95

Total 4.50 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 9.20 M-4L/O-4 M-4L/O-4 Required Pumping Capacity Max.Day (ML/D) 43.67

198.48 Res. Population 63,079Emerg. 0.90 Max.Day (ML/D) 5.83 60.80 Eighth Line PS O-4

Existing Storage 18 80.0% Existing Storage 32 Peak Hr. (ML/D)Empl. Force 5,275

Fire 3.30 Existing Storage 9.05 Empl. Force 999,879 Total 15.06

Empl. Force 13,740 236.22Equal. 0.30 Total 15.06 Res. Population Max.Day (ML/D) 125.70 Pressure Zone O4M-5L Total 21.54

Waterdown ET Fire 3.30 236.22 Fire 3.30 34.43TWL 277.67 Emerg. 3.01 Pressure Zone B4 Emerg. 3.01 Emerg.

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 120.00 Fire 3.30 Res. Population 182,5544.31 9.24

42,305 TWL 198.03 236.00Equal. 8.75 Equal. 8.75 Max.Day (ML/D) 76.00TWL 203.30 0.87 TWL 200.20 Empl. Force

Equal. 13.94 Combined Pressure Zone M-4L & O-4

Firm Capacity 1.96

4.55 29.88Tyandaga Res 15.0% Headon Res Res. Population 72,952 Moore Res

Installed Capacity 5.26 267.00B-4 Pressure Zone M5L

q p g p y

0.96 ML/D 13.80

North Aldershot Res

TWL

Equal. 0.30Fire 3.30

Emerg. 0.90Total 4.50

Existing Storage 4.5

1 HGLmML

B1A MLm ML mML HGL ML MLML ML MLML MLML MLML ML HGL

1 1 30%m mML ML HGLML HGL ML 70%ML MLML ML 22%ML ML

Res. Population 62,343

Max.Day (ML/D) 42.64 75.96Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 23,130 Existing Storage 27.00Total 14.11 Res. Population 20,400 Total 25.62 Empl. Force 6,002

Pressure Zone O1Emerg. 2.82 Pressure Zone B2 Emerg. 5.12 120.57 75.65

Fire 3.30 0.96 167.70 Fire 3.30Equal. 7.99 3.0% Equal. 17.20 135.03TWL 135.03 B-2 TWL 135.03 44.90

72.0% 25.0% 51.67 23.9810.44 Brant St Res 23.00 7.99 Washburn Res

Firm Capacity 30.00Installed Capacity 46.00

B-2 B-2

Installed Capacity 92.00 Installed Capacity ----- 99.94

Firm Capacity 50.00 28.19

15.80 ML/D Installed Capacity 13.08 Installed Capacity 136.50

ML/D 44.90 ML/D

Required Pumping Capacity Firm Capacity 6.60 Firm Capacity 109.20 Firm Capacity 60.00

Kingsway BPS 6.21 ML/D 53.16 ML/D 32.50

14.61 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

100.0% Brant St. PS B-3 Washburn PS B-2 Washburn PS B-3 B-2 BPS

5.16 O-2 O-2

Installed Capacity

99.95 ML/D

B-1A Firm Capacity 102.26

30.16 8.73 9.36 33.20 Required Pumping Capacity

8.00 172.24 22.0% 78.0% Davis Rd O-2

154.28

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 67.20

Res. Population 34,471Empl. Force 28,014

Max.Day (ML/D) 42.56

1.19

167.04Peak Hr. (ML/D) 14.61 19.96 Pressure Zone O2

Existing Storage 15.00 Max.Day (ML/D) 9.25 Existing Storage 17

ValveTotal 7.02 Empl. Force 2,307 Total 17.43

Fire 3.30Emerg. 1.40 Res. Population 11,604 Emerg. 3.49

10.64 3.32 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 5.23Fire 3.30 Pressure Zone B1A Existing Storage 40

Equal. 2.31 140.21 Total 17.45 Equal.

1,184TWL 140.21 Emerg. 3.49 TWL 128.016 100.0% Max.Day (ML/D) 3.32Waterdown Res Fire 3.30 McCraney Res O-2A Empl. Force

180.00TWL 135.00 Pressure Zone O2A

Equal. 10.66 85.57 Res. Population 4,417

Firm Capacity 4.79 3.32Installed Capacity ----- Kitchen Res

5.04 28.69

1.19 ML/D 5.25 24.50 5.25

Waterdown PS B-3 B-3 B-3Required Pumping Capacity 0.96 15.0% 70.0% 15.0%

ML ML

15%

85%

HGL

m

HGL MLML

MLMLML

####Criteria Dropped by:

Burloak WPP Oakville WPP

Installed Capacity ----- Installed Capacity 152.73

118.61 ML/D

Oakville WPP

Firm Capacity 263.00 Max.Day (ML/D)

205.0 ML/D

2.01

TWL 126.64 203.25 ML/D Empl. Force 9,424

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 0.28

Burlington WPP

Empl. Force 152 Total 25.62Max.Day (ML/D) 0.18 Existing Storage 11.00

Res. Population 143 Emerg. 5.12

Firm Capacity 130.00Pressure Zone B1B Fire 3.30 Installed Capacity 343.75 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 108.62

68.79 Firm Capacity 220.00126.64 Equal. 17.20

0.28 Mount Forest Res Required Pumping Capacity 68.79 Res. Population 93,901 Required Pumping Capacity Required Pumping Capacity

100.0% 10.62 Burlington WPP 100.0% Pressure Zone B1 Burloak WPP

Installed Capacity 7.55 134.46B-1B B-1 135.03

Required Pumping Capacity

0.18 2.01 ML/D

Firm Capacity 2.31

O-1100.0%

Mount Forest PS 12.62 121.83 36.17 42.64

204.95

Peak Hr. (ML/D) 50.44 165.476.21 85.67

Max.Day (ML/D) 42.64 75.96Max.Day (ML/D) 31.94 Peak Hr. (ML/D) 67.33

Existing Storage 23.00 Empl. Force 23,130 Existing Storage 27.00

2031SH Schematic (5p efficiency)-July28-2011.xlsx

Figure 10.Water Servicing Flow Schematic - 2031

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 36

Table 17. Water Storage Requirements

2011 A: Fire Storage B:

Equalization C:

Emergency TOTAL

REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)

2016 A: Fire Storage B: Equalization

C: Emergency

TOTAL REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)

South Halton

Max Day Demand

Equivalent Population

Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand

25% of A + B

South Halton

Max Day Demand

Equivalent Population

Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand

25% of A + B

(m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML) (m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML)

B1 61,360 110,003 311 3 3,362 15,339.98 4,675.60 23.4

B1 62,679 112,221 311 3 3,362 15,669.87 4,758.07 23.8

B1A 8,625 15,435 311 3 3,362 2,156.25 1,379.66 6.9

B1A 8,831 15,781 311 3 3,362 2,207.73 1,392.53 7.0

B3A, B4A,

B5A 587 1,169 311 3 3,362 146.87 877.32 4.4

B3A, B4A,

B5A 916 1,721 311 3 3,362 229.11 897.88 4.5

B1B 160 288 311 3 3,362 40.04 850.61 4.3

B1B 169 303 311 3 3,362 42.24 851.16 4.3

B2 30,400 54,499 311 3 3,362 7,600.10 2,740.63 13.7

B2 30,742 55,073 311 3 3,362 7,685.52 2,761.98 13.8

B3 32,863 59,692 311 3 3,362 8,215.72 2,894.53 14.5

B3 33,344 60,500 311 3 3,362 8,336.07 2,924.62 14.6

B4 5,597 9,980 311 3 3,362 1,399.35 1,190.44 6.0

B4 5,649 10,067 311 3 3,362 1,412.29 1,193.67 6.0

B5 177 315 311 3 3,362 44.22 851.66 4.3

B5 176 314 311 3 3,362 44.03 851.61 4.3

M4L 5,628 11,819 311 3 3,362 1,406.95 1,192.34 6.0

M4L 22,397 39,937 311 3 3,362 5,599.29 2,240.42 11.2

M5L 43,202 72,709 311 3 3,362 10,800.42 3,540.70 17.7

M5L 54,090 89,988 311 3 3,362 13,522.38 4,221.19 21.1

M5G 12,313 31,829 311 3 3,362 3,078.20 1,610.15 8.1

M5G 14,014 35,683 311 3 3,362 3,503.54 1,716.49 8.6

G6L 31 908 311 3 3,362 7.65 842.51 4.2

G6L 35 915 311 3 3,362 8.74 842.78 4.2

G5G, G6G,

G7G 24,485 44,621 311 3 3,362 6,121.15 2,370.89 11.9

G5G, G6G,

G7G 25,669 46,976 311 3 3,362 6,417.22 2,444.91 12.2

A9G 5,479 12,553 250 3 2,700 1,369.63 1,017.41 5.1

A9G 5,658 12,513 250 3 2,700 1,414.49 1,028.62 5.1

O1 36,864 65,979 311 3 3,362 9,215.92 3,144.58 15.7

O1 37,742 67,453 311 3 3,362 9,435.58 3,199.49 16.0

O2 30,560 54,884 311 3 3,362 7,640.12 2,750.63 13.8

O2 33,190 59,299 311 3 3,362 8,297.53 2,914.98 14.6

O2A 3,476 6,172 311 3 3,362 869.08 1,057.87 5.3

O2A 3,415 6,070 311 3 3,362 853.82 1,054.06 5.3

O3 47,149 84,205 311 3 3,362 11,787.24 3,787.41 18.9

O3 52,050 92,440 311 3 3,362 13,012.43 4,093.71 20.5

O4 11,348 21,578 311 3 3,362 2,836.91 1,549.83 7.7

O4 23,318 41,647 311 3 3,362 5,829.47 2,297.97 11.5

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 37

2021 A: Fire Storage B:

Equalization C:

Emergency TOTAL

REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)

2026 A: Fire Storage B: Equalization

C: Emergency

TOTAL REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)

South Halton

Max Day Demand

Equivalent Population

Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand

25% of A + B South Halton

Max Day Demand

Equivalent Population

Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand

25% of A + B

(m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML) (m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML)

B1 64,597 115,439 311 3 3,362 16,149.20 4,877.90 24.4

B1 66,926 119,344 311 3 3,362 16,731.50 5,023.47 25.1

B1A 9,064 16,171 311 3 3,362 2,265.90 1,407.07 7.0

B1A 9,077 16,194 311 3 3,362 2,269.28 1,407.92 7.0

B3A, B4A,

B5A 1,199 2,195 311 3 3,362 299.84 915.56 4.6

B3A, B4A,

B5A 1,190 2,179 311 3 3,362 297.40 914.95 4.6

B1B 169 304 311 3 3,362 42.37 851.19 4.3

B1B 171 305 311 3 3,362 42.63 851.26 4.3

B2 31,320 56,044 311 3 3,362 7,829.99 2,798.10 14.0

B2 31,483 56,317 311 3 3,362 7,870.63 2,808.26 14.0

B3 34,040 61,669 311 3 3,362 8,510.10 2,968.12 14.8

B3 34,146 61,847 311 3 3,362 8,536.61 2,974.75 14.9

B4 5,708 10,166 311 3 3,362 1,427.07 1,197.37 6.0

B4 5,703 10,158 311 3 3,362 1,425.82 1,197.06 6.0

B5 173 309 311 3 3,362 43.33 851.43 4.3

B5 170 303 311 3 3,362 42.38 851.20 4.3

M4L 41,223 71,502 311 3 3,362 10,305.69 3,417.02 17.1

M4L 60,787 104,306 311 3 3,362 15,196.71 4,639.78 23.2

M5L 64,229 105,835 311 3 3,362 16,057.14 4,854.89 24.3

M5L 74,306 121,805 311 3 3,362 18,576.47 5,484.72 27.4

M5G 15,221 38,888 311 3 3,362 3,805.34 1,791.93 9.0

M5G 15,329 40,030 311 3 3,362 3,832.36 1,798.69 9.0

G6L 8,661 904 311 3 3,362 2,165.13 1,381.88 6.9

G6L 15,698 12,635 311 3 3,362 3,924.47 1,821.72 9.1

G5G, G6G,

G7G 18,797 50,481 311 3 3,362 4,699.20 2,015.40 10.1

G5G, G6G,

G7G 19,843 52,643 311 3 3,362 4,960.82 2,080.80 10.4

A9G 6,258 13,311 250 3 2,700 1,564.58 1,066.14 5.3

A9G 7,670 16,122 250 3 2,700 1,917.62 1,154.40 5.8

O1 39,647 70,648 311 3 3,362 9,911.70 3,318.53 16.6

O1 40,908 72,763 311 3 3,362 10,227.12 3,397.38 17.0

O2 36,499 64,849 311 3 3,362 9,124.82 3,121.81 15.6

O2 39,243 69,449 311 3 3,362 9,810.69 3,293.27 16.5

O2A 3,355 5,970 311 3 3,362 838.86 1,050.32 5.3

O2A 3,312 5,896 311 3 3,362 827.92 1,047.58 5.2

O3 54,406 96,402 311 3 3,362 13,601.44 4,240.96 21.2

O3 54,305 96,233 311 3 3,362 13,576.20 4,234.65 21.2

O4 36,563 63,864 311 3 3,362 9,140.74 3,125.78 15.6

O4 40,774 70,925 311 3 3,362 10,193.39 3,388.95 16.9

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 38

2031 A: Fire Storage B: Equalization C: Emergency TOTAL

REQUIRED STORAGE (A+B+C)

South Halton

Max Day Demand

Equivalent Population

Fire Flow Duration A 25% of Max Day Demand

25% of A + B

(m3/d) (L/s) (hrs) (m3) (m3) (m3) (ML)

B1 68,790 122,471 311 3 3,362 17,197.52 5,139.98 25.7

B1A 9,254 16,491 311 3 3,362 2,313.55 1,418.99 7.1

B3A, B4A,

B5A 1,188 2,176 311 3 3,362 297.01 914.85 4.6

B1B 175 313 311 3 3,362 43.77 851.54 4.3

B2 31,944 57,092 311 3 3,362 7,986.01 2,837.10 14.2

B3 35,004 63,285 311 3 3,362 8,750.91 3,028.33 15.1

B4 5,827 10,365 311 3 3,362 1,456.68 1,204.77 6.0

B5 167 298 311 3 3,362 41.74 851.03 4.3

M4L 82,032 139,947 311 3 3,362 20,508.12 5,967.63 29.8

M5L 83,716 137,166 311 3 3,362 20,928.95 6,072.84 30.4

M5G 15,843 41,337 311 3 3,362 3,960.71 1,830.78 9.2

G6L 20,751 21,017 311 3 3,362 5,187.74 2,137.53 10.7

G5G, G6G,

G7G 23,214 58,944 311 3 3,362 5,803.44 2,291.46 11.5

A9G 8,341 17,459 250 3 2,700 2,085.36 1,196.34 6.0

O1 42,644 75,674 311 3 3,362 10,661.05 3,505.86 17.5

O2 42,561 75,016 311 3 3,362 10,640.15 3,500.64 17.5

O2A 3,315 5,903 311 3 3,362 828.82 1,047.81 5.2

O3 55,744 98,646 311 3 3,362 13,935.97 4,324.59 21.6

O4 43,671 75,784 311 3 3,362 10,917.77 3,570.04 17.9

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 39

5. Water Capital Program

The complete water capital program for the servicing strategies developed under the Sustainable Halton is provided in Table 18. This table provides Regional IPFS IDs, project descriptions, cost estimating details, and calculation of DC criteria. A project table listing key projects considered DC eligible although below sizing criteria is provided attached. The preferred water servicing strategy is depicted in Figure 11 and is based on the following key area components: Milton Lake Based Water Servicing

Milton lake-based service area includes existing areas outside the central core of the community and is serviced by Zone M4L and M5L.

Water supply is from the existing and proposed expansions of the WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs north to Milton.

Additional areas of the existing groundwater serviced area will need to be transferred to lake based supply to ensure sustainable groundwater and lake based service areas.

Components of the servicing strategy for the Milton lake-based service area include: Implement 2nd spine up Trafalgar Road alignment and 3rd spine along Neyagawa Boulevard. Implement new Zone 4/5 Boundary. Switchover strategic areas from Groundwater Supply to Lake Based Supply. Stage Oakville/Milton upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Additional Zone 4/5 Storage. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused

by intensification. This strategy provides security of supply to Milton and integrates Zone 4 and Zone 5 infrastructure.

Core Milton Groundwater Servicing

Upgrade Kelso WPP. Upgrade Feedermain to Main Street Reservoir. Decommission Walkers Line Well Field facilities. Switchover strategic areas of Milton, predominantly employment, to help alleviate groundwater capacity

constraints. Milton & Halton Hills 401 Employment Corridor Lake Based Water Servicing

Milton/Halton Hills 401 Corridor lake-based service area includes existing areas generally along Steeles Ave and is serviced by Zone M5L.

Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs north to Milton.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 40

Components of the servicing strategy for the Milton/Halton Hills 401 Corridor lake-based service area include:

Implement 2nd spine up Trafalgar Road alignment and 3rd Spine along Neyagawa Boulevard and a future road alignment.

Implement new Zone 4/5 Boundary. Stage Oakville/Milton upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. Implement Zone 5 Pumping Station (at Zone 4 Reservoir) and transmission for additional feed to 401

Corridor and Business Park II. This strategy provides security of supply to Milton and integrates Zone 4 and Zone 5 infrastructure.

North Oakville (East Growth Area) Water Servicing

The North Oakville (East Growth Areas) are generally located east of Sixteen Mile Creek. Part of these lands are serviced by pressure zone O3 and the remainder is serviced by pressure zone O4.

Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.

Maximize capacity from existing 8th Line infrastructure and expand capacity from the Kitchen Reservoir and PS and new Oakville Zone 4 pumping station

Components of the servicing strategy for North Oakville include:

Stage Oakville upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure and integrates capacity and timing

with infrastructure required for Milton. North Oakville (West Growth Area) Water Servicing

The North Oakville (West Growth Areas) are generally located west of Sixteen Mile Creek. These lands are serviced by pressure zone O3.

Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.

Components of the servicing strategy for North Oakville include:

Stage Oakville upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure and integrates capacity and timing

with infrastructure required for Burlington.

Oakville (Central) Water Servicing

The Oakville (Central Areas) are generally located east of Bronte Creek and South of Dundas. These lands are serviced by pressure zone O1, O2 and parts of O3.

Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 41

Components of the servicing strategy for Oakville include:

Stage Oakville upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide interconnection with Burlington at both Zone 2 and Zone 3 for improved service level and security

of supply. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP and Oakville WPP. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure and integrates capacity and timing

with infrastructure required for Burlington. Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused

by intensification. Burlington (Central) Water Servicing

The Burlington (Central Areas) include all areas in Burlington south of the Hwy 407 and Dundas Street excluding the North Aldershot areas. These lands are serviced by pressure zones B1, B2, B3, B4 and B5.

Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario (primarily the Burlington WPP) and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.

Components of the servicing strategy for Burlington include:

Stage Burlington upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Enhance transmission capacity to the Washburn reservoir and PS as well as in Zone 4 and Zone 5. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure and integrates capacity and timing

with infrastructure required for Oakville. Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused

by intensification. North Aldershot Water Servicing

The North Aldershot service areas include all areas in Burlington generally west of the Hwy QEW. These lands are serviced by pressure zones B1, B1A, B1B, B2 and B3A, B4A and B5A. Based on the topography, the areas in North Aldershot, north of the Hwy 403, will required several additional pressure zones.

Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario (primarily the Burlington WPP) and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs.

Components of the servicing strategy for North Aldershot include:

Stage Burlington upgrades to maximize existing capacity. Provide additional water supply capacity at Burloak WPP. Continue to maintain water supply interconnection from Hamilton. This strategy maximizes available capacity in existing infrastructure in Burlington and integrates capacity

and timing with infrastructure required for Oakville. Inter-Regional servicing from Hamilton for areas in Bridgeview and Snake Road continues to be a

preferred solution. Additional coordination of inter-Regional servicing for areas in North Aldershot will be undertaken. At this time, a Halton-only solution is identified.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 42

Georgetown Water Servicing

Maximize the groundwater service area. Provide new lake based water supply to new growth areas as well as transfer Southwest Georgetown and

Stewarttown to lake based supply in order to maintain the groundwater system within sustainable yields

Increased water taking at Cedarvale and Lindsay Court Well Fields. New Standby Wells at Lindsay Court. Expand water storage capacity at 22 Sideroad Reservoir. Artificial Recharge to Silver Creek / wetlands as support to overall strategy. Georgetown lake-based service area will be known as Zone G6L, this will include the existing area of

Georgetown South and Stewarttown along with the new growth area in Southwest Georgetown bounded by Trafalgar Road and No. 10 Side Road.

Water supply is from the existing and proposed WPPs at Lake Ontario and pumped through a series of pumping stations and reservoirs north to Georgetown.

Components of the servicing strategy for the Georgetown lake-based service area include:

New Zone 6 Pumping Station and Zone 4 reservoir at Trafalgar Road and No. 5 Side Road. New transmission main along Trafalgar Road. New lake based Zone 6 Reservoir at 22nd Side Road. Security of supply Lake-Based servicing connection to the Region of Peel at Bovaird Drive West. Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused

by intensification. Acton Water Servicing

Maintain the existing and future service areas on groundwater. Increase groundwater capacity at the Fourth Line and Prospect Park Well Fields as well as provide

additional new groundwater capacity. Maximize groundwater capacity and redundancy through centralized treatment for the northern supplies. Artificial Recharge to Black Creek / wetlands as support to the overall strategy.

Components of the servicing strategy for the Georgetown lake-based service area include:

Increased water taking at Prospect Park and Fourth Line Well Fields. Third Line Reservoir to be expanded. New north Acton Well. New Standby Well at 4th Line. Centralized Treatment at Third Line Reservoir Local infrastructure to be upgraded through intensification program to meet demand projections caused

by intensification.

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

Table 18 ‐ Water Capital Program

Region IPFS ID

Project Description Municipality Project Type Size/Capacity Length 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

54 30 ML/d Pumping Station at Appleby Line Reservoir (Zone B3) BUR P.S. 30.0 ML/d 5,552,000$ 1,936,040$ 7,488,040$ 2,621,223$ 164,737$ 10,274,000$ -$ -$ 10,274,000$ 7,397,280$ 2,876,720$ 1,027,000$ 9,247,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

97 Lindsay Court Well Field Expansion Class EA Study HHGEO Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ 350,000$ 252,000$ 98,000$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

4950 SCADA Master Plan Review for Water Purification Plants and Distribution Systems REG Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 126,000$ -$ 74,000$ 53,280$ 20,720$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

4985 1200 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from Britannia Rd to new Zone 4 Reservoir (Zone M4) HHGEO WM 1200 mm 9129 m 22,223,599$ 21,191,680$ 43,415,280$ 15,195,584$ 955,136$ 59,566,000$ -$ -$ 59,566,000$ 42,887,520$ 16,678,480$ 11,913,200$ -$ 47,652,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5716 Upgrade piping between Prospect Park Wells and WPP (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 377,000$ -$ -$ 377,000$ 271,440$ 105,560$ 75,400$ 301,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5717 Prospect Park WPP Expansion from 2.3 to 3.5 ML/d (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,513,000$ -$ -$ 3,513,000$ 2,529,360$ 983,640$ -$ 702,600$ 2,810,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5725 Water Servicing Master Plan Update REG Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,715,000$ -$ -$ 1,715,000$ 1,234,800$ 480,200$ -$ -$ 1,715,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5757 Cedarvale Capture Zone Assessment HHGEO Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 216,000$ 84,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5917 SCADA System Network Architecture Improvement Program (REG) REG Study 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 95,000$ -$ 55,000$ 39,600$ 15,400$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5918 Electrical Utility Meter Monitoring Installation Program (SCADA) (REG) REG Study 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 190,000$ 120,000$ -$ 70,000$ 50,400$ 19,600$ -$ 190,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5951 Design of Burloak WPP Phase 2 Expansion from 55 to 165 ML/d. OAK WPP 110.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,327,000$ -$ -$ 11,327,000$ 8,155,440$ 3,171,560$ -$ -$ 11,327,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6189 Water Supply Capacity Annual Monitoring Report REG Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 450,000$ -$ -$ 450,000$ 324,000$ 126,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6190 Water Distribution System Analysis REG Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ 1,584,000$ 616,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$

6364 1500 mm WM from Zone 2 Burloak PS to Kitchen Reservoir (Zone O1) (Construction) OAK WM 1500 mm 4450 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 53,062,000$ -$ 5,400,000$ 47,662,000$ 34,316,640$ 13,345,360$ 53,062,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6365 1800 mm WM from Burloak WPP to Burloak Zone 2 Booster Pumping Station (Zone O1) (Construction) BUR WM 1800 mm 2250 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 17,460,000$ -$ 3,200,000$ 14,260,000$ 10,267,200$ 3,992,800$ 17,460,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6372 Construction of Burloak WPP Phase 2 Expansion from 55 to 165 ML/d OAK WPP 110.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 98,433,000$ -$ -$ 98,433,000$ 70,871,760$ 27,561,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 98,433,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6437 Acton Well Field Development and Treatment (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,543,000$ -$ -$ 1,543,000$ 1,110,960$ 432,040$ -$ -$ 433,600$ -$ 1,109,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6439 Prospect Park Well Field Upgrades (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 807,000$ -$ -$ 807,000$ 581,040$ 225,960$ 161,400$ 645,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6440 Cedarvale Well Field Upgrades (Zone G6G) HHGEO WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,375,000$ -$ -$ 1,375,000$ 990,000$ 385,000$ -$ -$ 275,000$ 1,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6590 Acton Supply Standby Well (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,625,000$ -$ -$ 1,625,000$ 1,170,000$ 455,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 450,000$ -$ 1,175,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6605 750 mm WM Second feed to Washburn Reservoir (Zone B1) BUR WM 750 mm 4092 m 5,317,696$ 12,244,784$ 17,562,480$ 6,147,146$ 386,375$ 24,096,000$ 19,759,000$ -$ 4,337,000$ 3,122,640$ 1,214,360$ 4,819,200$ -$ 19,276,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6606 750 mm WM on Trafalgar from the new Zone 4 Reservoir to approximately 1,650 m north (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 1675 m 2,176,955$ 101,126$ 2,278,082$ 797,801$ 50,118$ 3,126,000$ -$ -$ 3,126,000$ 2,250,720$ 875,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 625,200$ 2,500,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6607 750 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from 1,650 m north of Zone 4 Reservoir to No 10 Siderd (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 1519 m 1,973,476$ 584,628$ 2,558,104$ 895,618$ 56,278$ 3,510,000$ -$ -$ 3,510,000$ 2,527,200$ 982,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 702,000$ 2,808,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6661 900 mm Second Feedermain to Davis Road Booster Pumping Station (Zone O1) OAK WM 900 mm 2388 m 3,998,067$ 6,478,735$ 10,476,803$ 3,467,228$ 226,970$ 14,171,000$ 6,802,000$ -$ 7,369,000$ 5,305,680$ 2,063,320$ 2,934,200$ -$ 11,236,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6668 Centralized Treatment at 3rd line Reservoir Class EA Study (Zone A9G) HHACT Study 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 108,000$ 42,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6675 Kelso WPP Residual Management Study & optimization (Zone M5G) MIL WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ 2,880,000$ 1,120,000$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6676 Acton Artificial Recharge Study HHACT Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ 180,000$ 70,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6677 Acton Artificial Recharge Capital Works HHACT WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,300,000$ 3,150,000$ -$ 3,150,000$ 2,268,000$ 882,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 1,260,000$ 4,940,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6678 Georgetown Artificial Recharge Study HHGEO Study -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 250,000$ -$ 250,000$ 180,000$ 70,000$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6679 Georgetown Artificial Recharge Capital Works HHGEO WPP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 29,600,000$ 14,800,000$ -$ 14,800,000$ 10,656,000$ 4,144,000$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 5,920,000$ 23,580,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6680 Oakville WPP Intake Pipe Extension - Design OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ 150,000$ -$ 1,350,000$ 972,000$ 378,000$ -$ -$ 1,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6681 Oakville WPP Intake Pipe Extension - Construction OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,500,000$ 850,000$ -$ 7,650,000$ 5,508,000$ 2,142,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6682 Class EA Study of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 100,000$ -$ 900,000$ 648,000$ 252,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6683 Design of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d. OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,464,000$ 346,000$ -$ 3,118,000$ 2,244,960$ 873,040$ -$ -$ 3,464,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6684 Construction of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d OAK WPP 29.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,803,000$ 2,080,000$ -$ 18,723,000$ 13,480,560$ 5,242,440$ -$ -$ -$ 20,803,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6685 Bulk Water Stations on Existing Sites REG P.S. - - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,868,000$ -$ -$ 1,868,000$ 1,344,960$ 523,040$ 373,600$ 1,494,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6686 Bulk Water Stations on New Sites REG P.S. - - -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,267,000$ -$ -$ 3,267,000$ 2,352,240$ 914,760$ 653,400$ 2,613,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6693 20 ML/d Zone G6L pumping station at Zone 4 Reservoir HHGEO P.S. 20.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,000,000$ -$ -$ 9,000,000$ 6,480,000$ 2,520,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,800,000$ 7,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6695 Centralized Treatment at 3rd line Reservoir (Zone A9G) HHACT WPP 5.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,541,000$ -$ -$ 1,541,000$ 1,109,520$ 431,480$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 308,200$ 1,232,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6699 Burloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Design) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d BUR WPP 55.0 ML/d 11,849,000$ -$ 10,664,000$ 1,185,000$ 853,200$ 331,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,849,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6700 Burloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Construction) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d BUR WPP 55.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 76,008,000$ -$ 68,407,000$ 7,601,000$ 5,472,720$ 2,128,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 76,008,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6770 Burloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Class EA Study) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d BUR WPP 55.0 ML/d 1,323,000$ -$ 1,191,000$ 132,000$ 95,040$ 36,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,323,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

490,993,000$ 48,878,000$ 88,862,000$ 353,253,000$ 254,342,160$ 98,910,840$ 98,434,400$ 16,549,800$ 100,046,400$ 29,238,000$ 128,217,400$ 10,455,000$ 9,132,200$ 5,463,800$ 1,330,000$ 1,628,000$ 418,200$ 13,191,800$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 76,118,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$

Distribution - Greenfield

82 400 mm Zone 2 WM on 3rd Line from Wyecroft Rd to North Service Road (Zone O2) OAK WM 400 mm 574 m 402,437$ 313,015$ 715,452$ 250,808$ 15,740$ 982,000$ -$ -$ 982,000$ 726,680$ 255,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 196,400$ 785,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

3699 4.5 ML North Aldershot in ground Reservoir (Zone B3A) BUR P.S. 4.5 ML 3,330,000$ 366,600$ 3,696,600$ 1,294,075$ 81,325$ 5,072,000$ -$ -$ 5,072,000$ 3,753,280$ 1,318,720$ -$ 1,014,400$ 4,057,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

3700 400 mm WM from Waterdown Reservoir pumping station to new North Aldershot Reservoir (Zone B3A) BUR WM 400 mm 1496 m 1,049,443$ 611,725$ 1,661,168$ 581,286$ 36,546$ 2,279,000$ -$ -$ 2,279,000$ 1,686,460$ 592,540$ -$ 455,800$ 1,823,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

3713 400mm WM on Burnhamthorpe Rd from Trafalgar Rd to new North Oakville road. (Zone O4) (Design) OAK WM 400 mm 1359 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 317,000$ -$ -$ 317,000$ 234,580$ 82,420$ -$ -$ 317,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

4983 400 mm WM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Dundas St (Zone O4) (Design) OAK WM 400 mm 2101 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 424,000$ -$ -$ 424,000$ 313,760$ 110,240$ -$ 424,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5061 30 ML Reservoir, near Trafalgar Road and No.5 Siderd (Zone M4) HHGEO RES. 30.0 ML 22,200,000$ 1,444,000$ 23,644,000$ 8,275,832$ 520,168$ 32,440,000$ -$ -$ 32,440,000$ 24,005,600$ 8,434,400$ 7,488,000$ -$ 24,952,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5627 600 mm WM through North Oakville Lands from Tremaine Rd to Bronte Rd (Zone O3) OAK WM 600 mm 3004 m 2,957,853$ 2,317,958$ 5,275,812$ 1,846,121$ 116,068$ 7,238,000$ -$ -$ 7,238,000$ 5,356,120$ 1,881,880$ 1,447,600$ 5,790,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5632 300 mm WM on 9th Line from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Dundas St (Zone O4) OAK WM 300 mm 2051 m 1,330,753$ 312,072$ 1,642,826$ 575,032$ 36,142$ 2,254,000$ -$ -$ 2,254,000$ 1,667,960$ 586,040$ -$ -$ 450,800$ 1,803,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5633 300 mm WM on Burnhamthorpe Rd from new North Oakville road to 9th Line (Zone O4) OAK WM 300 mm 1520 m 986,643$ 720,551$ 1,707,193$ 597,249$ 37,558$ 2,342,000$ -$ -$ 2,342,000$ 1,733,080$ 608,920$ -$ -$ 468,400$ 1,873,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5718 Acton Reservoir Expansion from 4.5 to 7.0 ML (Construction) (Zone A9G) HHACT RES 2.5 ML 1,850,000$ 37,000$ 1,887,000$ 1,091,475$ 38,525$ 3,017,000$ -$ -$ 3,017,000$ 2,232,580$ 784,420$ -$ 117,000$ 2,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5850 1050 mm WM on Upper Middle Rd from Burloak Dr west to Appleby Line (Zone B2) (Construction) BUR WM 1050 mm 1955 m 3,940,549$ 2,978,838$ 6,919,387$ 1,453,347$ 141,266$ 8,514,000$ -$ 2,855,000$ 5,659,000$ 4,187,660$ 1,471,340$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,514,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5853 600 mm WM on Tremaine Rd from Dundas St to approximately 950 m north (North Oakville Lands) (Zone O3) OAK WM 600 mm 927 m 913,034$ 56,652$ 969,687$ 338,980$ 21,333$ 1,330,000$ -$ -$ 1,330,000$ 984,200$ 345,800$ 266,000$ 1,064,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5862400 mm WM loop from 5th Line running east then south on new Milton Business Park Roads to Derry Rd west to 5th Line (Zone M4)

MIL WM 400 mm 2367 m 1,660,580$ 890,523$ 2,551,102$ 892,773$ 56,124$ 3,500,000$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ 2,590,000$ 910,000$ -$ 700,000$ 2,800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5867 1200 mm WM on Britannia Rd from 4th Line to RR 25 (Zone M4) MIL WM 1200 mm 2858 m 6,957,379$ 7,276,326$ 14,233,705$ 4,982,154$ 313,142$ 19,529,000$ -$ 6,167,000$ 13,362,000$ 9,887,880$ 3,474,120$ -$ -$ -$ 3,905,800$ 15,623,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5868 750 mm WM on Britannia Rd from #5867 to approximately 2,100 m west (to new Milton South road) (Zone M4) MIL WM 750 mm 2048 m 2,661,978$ 2,876,697$ 5,538,675$ 1,938,474$ 121,851$ 7,599,000$ -$ -$ 7,599,000$ 5,623,260$ 1,975,740$ -$ 1,519,800$ 6,079,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5870 400 mm WM on new Milton South road from Britannia Rd to Louis St Laurent Ave (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1564 m 1,097,187$ 79,531$ 1,176,718$ 411,394$ 25,888$ 1,614,000$ -$ -$ 1,614,000$ 1,194,360$ 419,640$ -$ 322,800$ 1,291,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5875 900 mm WM on Derry Rd from new MIL Business Park Road to Trafalgar Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 900 mm 2719 m 4,553,899$ 2,387,233$ 6,941,131$ 2,429,164$ 152,705$ 9,523,000$ -$ -$ 9,523,000$ 7,047,020$ 2,475,980$ -$ 1,904,600$ 7,618,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5876 600 mm WM on new internal Milton road from Britannia Rd to Louis St Laurent Ave (Zone M4) MIL WM 600 mm 1543 m 1,518,772$ 468,247$ 1,987,018$ 695,267$ 43,714$ 2,726,000$ -$ -$ 2,726,000$ 2,017,240$ 708,760$ 545,200$ -$ 2,180,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5881 400 mm WM from Waterdown pumping station along North Service Rd to King Rd (Zone B2) BUR WM 400 mm 2916 m 2,045,144$ 2,764,235$ 4,809,380$ 1,682,814$ 105,806$ 6,598,000$ -$ -$ 6,598,000$ 4,882,520$ 1,715,480$ -$ 1,319,600$ 5,278,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6318 300mm WM on No 14 Siderd from Tremaine Rd. to Milton Reservoir (Zone M5G) MIL WM -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,046,000$ 815,000$ -$ 231,000$ 170,940$ 60,060$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 209,200$ 836,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6362 600mm in North Oakville along 6th Line to Burnhamthorpe Rd (Zone O4) OAK WM 600 mm 1019 m 1,003,147$ 457,934$ 1,461,081$ 511,775$ 32,144$ 2,005,000$ -$ -$ 2,005,000$ 1,483,700$ 521,300$ -$ -$ 401,000$ 1,604,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6367 120 ML/d Burloak Pumping Station Construction, Phase 1, 50 MLD (Zone B2) BUR P.S. 120.0 ML/d 10,000,000$ 700,000$ 10,700,000$ 1,605,432$ 216,568$ 12,522,000$ -$ 8,390,000$ 4,132,000$ 3,057,680$ 1,074,320$ -$ 12,522,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6368 1050 mm WM from Burloak Pumping Station north on Burloak Dr to Upper Middle Rd (Zone B2) (Construction) OAK WM 1050 mm 2460 m 4,959,044$ 335,897$ 5,294,941$ 1,111,958$ 108,102$ 6,515,000$ -$ 2,711,000$ 3,804,000$ 2,814,960$ 989,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,515,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6370 750 mm WM on Dundas St from 6th Line to WM #5321 at Dundas St and Neyagawa Blvd (Construction) (Zone O3) OAK WM 750 mm 2049 m 2,663,546$ 2,061,142$ 4,724,688$ 991,853$ 96,459$ 5,813,000$ -$ -$ 5,813,000$ 4,301,620$ 1,511,380$ -$ 5,813,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6375 400 mm WM on Dundas St from new North Oakville road to 9th Line (Zone O4) (Construction) OAK WM 400 mm 1500 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,470,000$ -$ -$ 1,470,000$ 1,087,800$ 382,200$ -$ 1,470,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Annualized Funding Requirements

Capacity

Total Capacity

Benefit to Existing (2012$)

Oversizing (2012$)

DC (2012$) Res (2012$) Non-Res (2012$)Base Cost

(2012$)

Additional Costs

(2012$)

Subtotal(2012$)

Contingency/ Engineering

(2012$)

Non-Rebatable HST

(2012$)

Total Estimated Cost (2012$)

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

Table 18 ‐ Water Capital Program

Region IPFS ID

Project Description Municipality Project Type Size/Capacity Length 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

Annualized Funding RequirementsBenefit to

Existing (2012$)Oversizing

(2012$)DC (2012$) Res (2012$) Non-Res (2012$)

Base Cost(2012$)

Additional Costs

(2012$)

Subtotal(2012$)

Contingency/ Engineering

(2012$)

Non-Rebatable HST

(2012$)

Total Estimated Cost (2012$)

6376 400mm WM east/west on Dundas St from 8th Line to new North Oakville road (Zone O4) (Construction) OAK WM 400 mm 552 m 387,420$ 1,512,580$ 1,900,000$ -$ -$ 1,900,000$ -$ -$ 1,900,000$ 1,406,000$ 494,000$ -$ 1,900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6398600 mm WM on re-aligned Tremaine Rd from Steeles Avenue to existing watermain on Peru Rd south of Hwy 401 (Zone M5L)

MIL WM 600 mm 1130 m 1,112,530$ 1,588,671$ 2,701,201$ 4,139,372$ 59,426$ 6,900,000$ -$ -$ 6,900,000$ 5,106,000$ 1,794,000$ 1,380,000$ -$ 5,520,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6443 400 mm WM on Burnhamthorpe Rd from Trafalgar Rd to new North Oakville road (Zone O4) (Construction) OAK WM 400 mm 1359 m 953,090$ 609,798$ 1,562,889$ 234,854$ 30,258$ 1,828,000$ -$ -$ 1,828,000$ 1,352,720$ 475,280$ -$ -$ -$ 1,828,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6444 400 mm WM from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Dundas St on new North Oakville road (Zone O4) (Construction) OAK WM 400 mm 2101 m 1,473,716$ 620,211$ 2,093,926$ 314,535$ 40,538$ 2,449,000$ -$ -$ 2,449,000$ 1,812,260$ 636,740$ -$ -$ 2,449,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6597 300 mm WM on Reg Rd 25 from new well connection to 640 m North of Wallace St (Zone A9G) HHACT WM 300 mm 959 m 622,317$ 156,600$ 778,917$ 272,947$ 17,136$ 1,069,000$ -$ -$ 1,069,000$ 791,060$ 277,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 213,800$ 855,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6598 300 mm WM from New Well to Reg Rd 25 (Zone A9G) HHACT WM 300 mm 480 m 311,410$ 11,928$ 323,339$ 113,548$ 7,113$ 444,000$ -$ -$ 444,000$ 328,560$ 115,440$ -$ -$ -$ 88,800$ -$ 355,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6600300 mm WM on Reg Rd 25 from new well connection to No. 32 Siderd and on No. 32 Siderd from Reg Rd 25 to 3rd Line Reservoir (Zone A9G)

HHACT WM 300 mm 1841 m 1,194,682$ 32,444$ 1,227,126$ 429,877$ 26,997$ 1,684,000$ -$ -$ 1,684,000$ 1,246,160$ 437,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 336,800$ 1,347,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6603 400 mm WM on 8th Line from 10th Siderd to existing 400 mm (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 400 mm 1200 m 841,736$ 340,997$ 1,182,733$ 414,247$ 26,020$ 1,623,000$ -$ -$ 1,623,000$ 1,201,020$ 421,980$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 324,600$ 1,298,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6604150mm WM on 3rd Line from 3rd Line Reservoir to No. 32 Siderd and on No. 32 Siderd from 3rd Line to 950 m easterly (Zone A9G)

HHACT WM 150 mm 950 m 473,569$ 52,003$ 525,572$ 183,866$ 11,563$ 721,000$ -$ -$ 721,000$ 533,540$ 187,460$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 144,200$ 576,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6608 750 mm WM on Trafalgar from 15th Siderd to 22nd Siderd Lake Based Reservoir (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 4300 m 5,587,955$ 3,282,427$ 8,870,382$ 3,104,470$ 195,148$ 12,170,000$ -$ -$ 12,170,000$ 9,005,800$ 3,164,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,434,000$ 9,736,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6609 400 mm WM on 17th Siderd from Trafalgar Rd to Main St (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 400 mm 1323 m 928,076$ 342,723$ 1,270,799$ 445,243$ 27,958$ 1,744,000$ -$ -$ 1,744,000$ 1,290,560$ 453,440$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 348,800$ 1,395,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6610 600 mm WM on 10th Siderd from Trafalgar Rd to 8th Line (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1408 m 1,386,013$ 465,591$ 1,851,604$ 647,660$ 40,735$ 2,540,000$ -$ -$ 2,540,000$ 1,879,600$ 660,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 508,000$ 2,032,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6611 600 mm WM on No 10 Siderd from 8th Line to 9th Line (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1440 m 1,417,325$ 466,218$ 1,883,542$ 659,020$ 41,438$ 2,584,000$ -$ -$ 2,584,000$ 1,912,160$ 671,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 516,800$ 2,067,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6612 600 mm WM on No 10 Siderd from 9th Line to 10th Line (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1398 m 1,376,655$ 845,688$ 2,222,343$ 777,766$ 48,892$ 3,049,000$ -$ -$ 3,049,000$ 2,256,260$ 792,740$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 609,800$ 2,439,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6613 600 mm WM on No 10 Siderd from 10th Line to Adamson St S (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 673 m 662,720$ 431,930$ 1,094,650$ 383,268$ 24,082$ 1,502,000$ -$ -$ 1,502,000$ 1,111,480$ 390,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,400$ 1,201,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6614 600 mm WM on Adamson St from 10th Siderd to Guelph St and on Guelph St from Adamson St to 10th Siderd (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1241 m 1,221,854$ 592,024$ 1,813,879$ 635,216$ 39,905$ 2,489,000$ -$ -$ 2,489,000$ 1,841,860$ 647,140$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 497,800$ 1,991,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6615 600 mm WM on No 10 Siderd from Guelph St to Bovaird Dr (Region of Peel) (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 600 mm 1280 m 1,260,224$ 82,792$ 1,343,016$ 470,438$ 29,546$ 1,843,000$ -$ -$ 1,843,000$ 1,363,820$ 479,180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 368,600$ 1,474,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6616 400 mm WM on Thompson Rd South from Britannia Rd to approx. 1,156 south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1211 m 849,124$ 341,144$ 1,190,268$ 416,546$ 26,186$ 1,633,000$ -$ -$ 1,633,000$ 1,208,420$ 424,580$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 326,600$ 1,306,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6617 400 mm WM on new roadway south of Britannia Rd from Thompson Rd South to 4th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1345 m 943,716$ 609,611$ 1,553,326$ 543,500$ 34,173$ 2,131,000$ -$ -$ 2,131,000$ 1,576,940$ 554,060$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 426,200$ 1,704,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6618 400 mm WM on new roadway south of Britannia Rd from 4th Line to 5th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1379 m 967,099$ 610,078$ 1,577,177$ 552,125$ 34,698$ 2,164,000$ -$ -$ 2,164,000$ 1,601,360$ 562,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 432,800$ 1,731,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6619 400 mm WM on new roadway south of Britannia Rd fom 5th Line to 6th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1405 m 985,595$ 77,299$ 1,062,894$ 371,722$ 23,384$ 1,458,000$ -$ -$ 1,458,000$ 1,078,920$ 379,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 291,600$ 1,166,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6620 400 mm WM on 6th Line from Britannia Rd to 600 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 600 m 420,985$ 313,386$ 734,370$ 257,474$ 16,156$ 1,008,000$ -$ -$ 1,008,000$ 745,920$ 262,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 201,600$ 806,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6621 400 mm WM on 6th Line from Britannia Rd to 1,500 m north (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1503 m 1,054,313$ 829,201$ 1,883,515$ 659,048$ 41,437$ 2,584,000$ -$ -$ 2,584,000$ 1,912,160$ 671,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 516,800$ 2,067,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6622 400 mm WM on 6th Line from Derry Rd to new Rd 1,500 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1600 m 1,122,564$ 1,146,337$ 2,268,901$ 794,183$ 49,916$ 3,113,000$ -$ -$ 3,113,000$ 2,303,620$ 809,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 622,600$ 2,490,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6623 400 mm WM on 5th Line from Britannia Rd to 1,500 m north of Britannia Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1484 m 1,041,296$ 344,988$ 1,386,284$ 485,218$ 30,498$ 1,902,000$ -$ -$ 1,902,000$ 1,407,480$ 494,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 380,400$ 1,521,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6624 400 mm WM on 4th Line from Britannia Rd to 650 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 636 m 446,266$ 47,317$ 493,583$ 172,558$ 10,859$ 677,000$ -$ -$ 677,000$ 500,980$ 176,020$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 135,400$ 541,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6625 400 mm WM on Lower Base Line (East) from 4th Line to 5th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1387 m 972,748$ 876,766$ 1,849,514$ 647,796$ 40,689$ 2,538,000$ -$ -$ 2,538,000$ 1,878,120$ 659,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 507,600$ 2,030,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6626 400 mm WM on 5th Line from Britannia Rd to 650 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 648 m 454,258$ 47,477$ 501,734$ 175,228$ 11,038$ 688,000$ -$ -$ 688,000$ 509,120$ 178,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 137,600$ 550,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6627 400 mm WM on 4th Line from 650 m south of Britannia Rd to Lower Base Line (West) (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1759 m 1,234,139$ 348,845$ 1,582,983$ 554,191$ 34,826$ 2,172,000$ -$ -$ 2,172,000$ 1,607,280$ 564,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 434,400$ 1,737,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6628 400 mm WM on 5th Line from 650 m south of Britannia Rd to Lower Base Line (West) (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1738 m 1,219,177$ 881,694$ 2,100,871$ 734,910$ 46,219$ 2,882,000$ -$ -$ 2,882,000$ 2,132,680$ 749,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 576,400$ 2,305,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6629 600 mm WM on Louis St. Laurent Ave from 5th Line to 6th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 600 mm 1363 m 1,342,371$ 464,719$ 1,807,090$ 632,155$ 39,756$ 2,479,000$ -$ -$ 2,479,000$ 1,834,460$ 644,540$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 495,800$ 1,983,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6630 600 mm WM on Louis St. Laurent Ave from 6th Line toTrafalgar Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 600 mm 1386 m 1,364,985$ 1,606,022$ 2,971,007$ 1,039,631$ 65,362$ 4,076,000$ -$ -$ 4,076,000$ 3,016,240$ 1,059,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 815,200$ 3,260,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6631 400 mm WM on Louis St. Laurent Ave from Trafalgar Rd to 8th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1399 m 981,208$ 876,935$ 1,858,143$ 649,978$ 40,879$ 2,549,000$ -$ -$ 2,549,000$ 1,886,260$ 662,740$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 509,800$ 2,039,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6632 400 mm WM on Britannia Rd from Trafalgar Rd to 600 m east (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 595 m 417,308$ 313,312$ 730,620$ 255,306$ 16,074$ 1,002,000$ -$ -$ 1,002,000$ 741,480$ 260,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,400$ 801,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6633 400 mm WM on Britannia Rd from 600 m east of Trafalgar Rd to 8th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 685 m 480,667$ 314,579$ 795,246$ 278,258$ 17,495$ 1,091,000$ -$ -$ 1,091,000$ 807,340$ 283,660$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 218,200$ 872,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6634 400 mm WM on new Milton Rd from Trafalgar Rd to approximately 700 m east (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 698 m 489,325$ 581,327$ 1,070,652$ 374,793$ 23,554$ 1,469,000$ -$ -$ 1,469,000$ 1,087,060$ 381,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 293,800$ 1,175,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6635 400 mm WM on 8th Line from Derry Rd. to approximately 1,600 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1610 m 1,129,174$ 879,894$ 2,009,068$ 702,732$ 44,199$ 2,756,000$ -$ -$ 2,756,000$ 2,039,440$ 716,560$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 551,200$ 2,204,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6636 400 mm WM on 8th Line from Britannia Rd to approximately 1,500 m north (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1471 m 1,031,622$ 562,173$ 1,593,795$ 558,142$ 35,063$ 2,187,000$ -$ -$ 2,187,000$ 1,618,380$ 568,620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 437,400$ 1,749,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6637 400 mm WM on new roadway from Britannia Rd to approx. 1,200 m south (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1146 m 803,867$ 340,239$ 1,144,106$ 400,724$ 25,170$ 1,570,000$ -$ -$ 1,570,000$ 1,161,800$ 408,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 314,000$ 1,256,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6638 400 mm WM on Derry Rd from Trafalgar Rd to 500 m east (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 505 m 353,938$ 45,470$ 399,408$ 139,805$ 8,787$ 548,000$ -$ -$ 548,000$ 405,520$ 142,480$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 109,600$ 438,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6639 400 mm WM on Derry Rd from 600 m east of Trafalgar Rd to 8th Line (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 843 m 591,661$ 50,225$ 641,886$ 224,992$ 14,121$ 881,000$ -$ -$ 881,000$ 651,940$ 229,060$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 176,200$ 704,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6640 600 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from Zone 4 Reservoir to 600 mm Zone M5L WM on Steeles Avenue (ID 3844) (Zone M5L) MIL WM 600 mm 3199 m 3,149,520$ 1,561,224$ 4,710,744$ 1,648,620$ 103,636$ 6,463,000$ -$ -$ 6,463,000$ 4,782,620$ 1,680,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,292,600$ 5,170,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6641 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles Ave parallel to Hornby Rd (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 374 m 262,139$ 527,588$ 789,727$ 276,899$ 17,374$ 1,084,000$ -$ -$ 1,084,000$ 802,160$ 281,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 216,800$ 867,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6642 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles from Hornby Rd to Trafalgar Rd (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 926 m 649,523$ 584,531$ 1,234,055$ 431,796$ 27,149$ 1,693,000$ -$ -$ 1,693,000$ 1,252,820$ 440,180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 338,600$ 1,354,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6643400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles from Trafalgar Rd to approximately 400m east of 8th Line (Zone M5L)

HH401 WM 400 mm 1013 m 710,758$ 1,088,905$ 1,799,663$ 629,745$ 39,593$ 2,469,000$ -$ -$ 2,469,000$ 1,827,060$ 641,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 493,800$ 1,975,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6644 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor from Steeles Ave to approximately 300 m north (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 357 m 250,316$ 527,351$ 777,667$ 272,224$ 17,109$ 1,067,000$ -$ -$ 1,067,000$ 789,580$ 277,420$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 213,400$ 853,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6645400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles Ave. from 1,000 m west of 9th Line to 900 m east of 9th Line (Zone M5L)

HH401 WM 400 mm 1759 m 1,233,749$ 82,262$ 1,316,011$ 461,036$ 28,952$ 1,806,000$ -$ -$ 1,806,000$ 1,336,440$ 469,560$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 361,200$ 1,444,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6646 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor from Steeles Ave to approximately 330 m north (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 327 m 229,543$ 526,936$ 756,479$ 264,879$ 16,643$ 1,038,000$ -$ -$ 1,038,000$ 768,120$ 269,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 207,600$ 830,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6647400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor north of Steeles Ave. from 600 m west of 10th Line to 1,000 m east of 10th Line (Zone M5L)

HH401 WM 400 mm 1582 m 1,109,985$ 346,362$ 1,456,347$ 509,614$ 32,040$ 1,998,000$ -$ -$ 1,998,000$ 1,478,520$ 519,480$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 399,600$ 1,598,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6648 400 mm WM in the 401 growth corridor from Steeles Ave to 340 m north (Zone M5L) HH401 WM 400 mm 338 m 237,127$ 793,662$ 1,030,789$ 360,534$ 22,677$ 1,414,000$ -$ -$ 1,414,000$ 1,046,360$ 367,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 282,800$ 1,131,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6649 400 mm WM on Esquesing Line from James Snow Parkway to approximately 800 m north (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 784 m 549,876$ 315,964$ 865,839$ 303,112$ 19,048$ 1,188,000$ -$ -$ 1,188,000$ 879,120$ 308,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 237,600$ 950,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6650 400 mm WM on new roadway from Esquesing Line to Boston Church Rd (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 1669 m 1,171,062$ 614,158$ 1,785,220$ 624,505$ 39,275$ 2,449,000$ -$ -$ 2,449,000$ 1,812,260$ 636,740$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 489,800$ 1,959,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6651 400 mm WM on new roadway from Boston Church Rd to approximately 360 m west (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 813 m 570,276$ 316,372$ 886,648$ 309,846$ 19,506$ 1,216,000$ -$ -$ 1,216,000$ 899,840$ 316,160$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 243,200$ 972,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6652 400 mm WM on new roadway from 360 m west of Boston Church Rd to No 5 Siderd (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 695 m 487,501$ 314,716$ 802,217$ 281,134$ 17,649$ 1,101,000$ -$ -$ 1,101,000$ 814,740$ 286,260$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 220,200$ 880,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6653 400 mm WM on No 5 Siderd from approximately 400 m west of 3rd Line to 3rd Line (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 390 m 273,553$ 43,863$ 317,415$ 110,602$ 6,983$ 435,000$ -$ -$ 435,000$ 321,900$ 113,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 87,000$ 348,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6654 750 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from 10th Siderd to approximately 1,700 m north of 10th Siderd (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 1658 m 2,154,471$ 588,248$ 2,742,719$ 959,942$ 60,340$ 3,763,000$ -$ -$ 3,763,000$ 2,784,620$ 978,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 752,600$ 3,010,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6655 750 mm WM on Trafalgar from 1,700 m north of 10th Siderd to 15th Siderd (Zone G6L) HHGEO WM 750 mm 1444 m 1,877,281$ 582,704$ 2,459,984$ 860,896$ 54,120$ 3,375,000$ -$ -$ 3,375,000$ 2,497,500$ 877,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 675,000$ 2,700,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6656 400 mm WM on Britannia Rd from Tremaine Rd to approximately 700 m east (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 712 m 499,768$ 314,961$ 814,729$ 285,347$ 17,924$ 1,118,000$ -$ -$ 1,118,000$ 827,320$ 290,680$ 223,600$ 894,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6657 400 mm WM on Tremaine Rd from 1,000 m south of Britannia Rd to 2,200 m south of Britannia Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1234 m 865,587$ 608,048$ 1,473,635$ 515,945$ 32,420$ 2,022,000$ -$ -$ 2,022,000$ 1,496,280$ 525,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 404,400$ 1,617,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6658 400 mm WM on Tremaine Rd from Britannia Rd to 1,000 m south of Britannia Rd (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 974 m 683,332$ 318,633$ 1,001,964$ 350,993$ 22,043$ 1,375,000$ -$ -$ 1,375,000$ 1,017,500$ 357,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 275,000$ 1,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6659 400 mm WM on new road alignment from Tremaine Rd to approximately 360 m west (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 392 m 274,819$ 43,888$ 318,707$ 111,281$ 7,012$ 437,000$ -$ -$ 437,000$ 323,380$ 113,620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 87,400$ 349,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6660 400 mm WM on Tremaine Rd from Louis St Laurent to Britannia Rd West (Zone M4) MIL WM 400 mm 1670 m 1,171,474$ 81,017$ 1,252,490$ 437,955$ 27,555$ 1,718,000$ -$ -$ 1,718,000$ 1,271,320$ 446,680$ 343,600$ 1,374,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6662 400 mm WM on Wyecroft Rd from Burloak Dr to 3rd Line (Zone O2) OAK WM 400 mm 4548 m 3,189,863$ 4,808,077$ 7,997,940$ 2,799,105$ 175,955$ 10,973,000$ -$ -$ 10,973,000$ 8,120,020$ 2,852,980$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,194,600$ 8,778,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6664Relining of Walkers Line Well Feedermain with 150mm pipe within existing easement from West Appleby Line to Surge Tank (Zone M5L)

MIL WM 150 mm 750 m 150,000$ 7,772$ 157,772$ 54,757$ 3,471$ 216,000$ -$ -$ 216,000$ 159,840$ 56,160$ -$ -$ 43,200$ 172,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6666 750 mm WM on James Snow Parkway from Burnhamthorpe Rd W to Lower Base Line W (Zone M4) MIL WM 750 mm 2667 m 3,465,929$ 2,464,326$ 5,930,255$ 2,075,279$ 130,466$ 8,136,000$ -$ 7,322,000$ 814,000$ 602,360$ 211,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,627,200$ -$ 6,508,800$ -$ -$

6667 Lake Based Servicing Transfer (Zone M5L) MIL WM 300 mm 1100 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,165,000$ -$ -$ 3,165,000$ 2,342,100$ 822,900$ 633,000$ 2,532,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6688 400 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from Steeles Avenue to Hwy 401 (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 327 m 229,642$ 42,984$ 272,627$ 95,375$ 5,998$ 374,000$ -$ -$ 374,000$ 276,760$ 97,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 74,800$ 299,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6689 400 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd Hwy 401 Crossing (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 290 m 203,180$ 1,856,613$ 2,059,793$ 720,892$ 45,315$ 2,826,000$ -$ -$ 2,826,000$ 2,091,240$ 734,760$ 565,200$ -$ 2,260,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6690 400 mm WM on Trafalgar Rd from Hwy 401 to Main St Extension (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 792 m 555,803$ 316,082$ 871,885$ 304,933$ 19,181$ 1,196,000$ -$ -$ 1,196,000$ 885,040$ 310,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 239,200$ 956,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6691 400 mm WM on Main St extension from Trafalgar Rd (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 820 m 574,975$ 800,419$ 1,375,394$ 481,348$ 30,259$ 1,887,000$ -$ -$ 1,887,000$ 1,396,380$ 490,620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 377,400$ 1,509,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

Table 18 ‐ Water Capital Program

Region IPFS ID

Project Description Municipality Project Type Size/Capacity Length 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

Annualized Funding RequirementsBenefit to

Existing (2012$)Oversizing

(2012$)DC (2012$) Res (2012$) Non-Res (2012$)

Base Cost(2012$)

Additional Costs

(2012$)

Subtotal(2012$)

Contingency/ Engineering

(2012$)

Non-Rebatable HST

(2012$)

Total Estimated Cost (2012$)

6692 400 mm WM on Main St extension from 5th Line to approximately 2,100 m east (Zone M5L) MIL WM 400 mm 2095 m 1,469,719$ 1,419,854$ 2,889,574$ 1,010,856$ 63,571$ 3,964,000$ -$ -$ 3,964,000$ 2,933,360$ 1,030,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 792,800$ 3,171,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6694 10 ML Zone G6L Storage at 22nd Siderd HHGEO RES. 10.0 ML 7,400,000$ 548,000$ 7,948,000$ 2,782,144$ 174,856$ 10,905,000$ -$ -$ 10,905,000$ 8,069,700$ 2,835,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,181,000$ 8,724,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6696 20 ML/d Zone M5L pumping station at Zone M4L Reservoir HHGEO P.S. 20.0 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ -$ -$ 2,000,000$ 1,480,000$ 520,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 1,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6697 20 ML storage expansion at Zone M4 Resevoir HHGEO RES. 20.0 ML 14,800,000$ 296,000$ 15,096,000$ 5,283,888$ 332,112$ 20,712,000$ -$ -$ 20,712,000$ 15,326,880$ 5,385,120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,142,400$ 16,569,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6698 10 ML storage expansion at Zone M5L Reservoir MIL RES. 10.0 ML 7,400,000$ 148,000$ 7,548,000$ 2,641,944$ 166,056$ 10,356,000$ -$ -$ 10,356,000$ 7,663,440$ 2,692,560$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,071,200$ 8,284,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6701 Kitchen Zone O3 Pumping Station expansion by 80 ML/d BUR P.S. 80 ML/d 6,482,000$ 129,640$ 6,611,640$ 5,242,904$ 145,456$ 12,000,000$ -$ 8,040,000$ 3,960,000$ 2,930,400$ 1,029,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,400,000$ 9,600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6702 40 ML/d expansion at the North Oakville Zone O4 Pumping Station (existing site) OAK P.S. 40.0 ML/d 3,241,000$ 64,820$ 3,305,820$ 1,157,452$ 72,728$ 4,536,000$ -$ -$ 4,536,000$ 3,356,640$ 1,179,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 907,200$ 3,628,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6863 Waterdown Road Pumping Station Expansion (Zones B2, B3A & B5A) BUR P.S. 3,837,534$ -$ 3,837,534$ 1,343,040$ 84,426$ 5,265,000$ -$ -$ 5,265,000$ 3,896,100$ 1,368,900$ -$ 1,053,000$ 4,212,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

376,506,000$ 815,000$ 35,485,000$ 340,206,000$ 251,752,440$ 88,453,560$ 12,892,200$ 42,191,200$ 75,103,000$ 11,276,200$ 31,075,200$ 4,438,200$ 12,961,600$ 13,590,400$ 11,239,600$ 53,555,200$ 37,709,600$ 17,403,000$ 18,983,000$ 10,884,400$ 5,467,200$ 11,227,200$ -$ 6,508,800$ -$ -$

6601 7.8 ML/d expansion at Beaufort Pumping Station (new site) (Zone B5) BUR P.S. 90.0 l/s 1,440,000$ 28,800$ 1,468,800$ 513,886$ 32,314$ 2,015,000$ 1,856,000$ -$ 159,000$ 108,120$ 50,880$ -$ 403,000$ 1,612,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6602 7.5 ML storage expansion at Waterdown Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B1A) BUR RES. 7.5 ML 5,550,000$ 111,000$ 5,661,000$ 1,981,458$ 124,542$ 7,767,000$ 7,154,000$ -$ 613,000$ 416,840$ 196,160$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,553,400$ 6,213,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6663 400 mm WM from 9th Line on easement to Bristol Circle (Zone O3) OAK WM 400 mm 900 m 631,302$ 1,561,222$ 2,192,524$ 767,240$ 48,236$ 3,008,000$ 2,707,000$ -$ 301,000$ 204,680$ 96,320$ 781,600$ -$ 2,226,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6665 400 mm WM between Tyandanga Reservoir and Beaufort Reservoir (Zone B4) BUR WM 400 mm 2752 m 1,930,433$ 2,881,712$ 4,812,146$ 1,683,987$ 105,867$ 6,602,000$ 6,081,000$ -$ 521,000$ 354,280$ 166,720$ 1,620,400$ -$ 4,981,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6669 4.5 ML storage expansion at Tyandanga Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B3) BUR RES. 4.5 ML 3,330,000$ 66,600$ 3,396,600$ 1,188,675$ 74,725$ 4,660,000$ 4,292,000$ -$ 368,000$ 250,240$ 117,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 932,000$ 3,728,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6670 2.5 ML storage expansion at Beaufort Reservoir Expansion (new site) (Zone B4) BUR RES. 2.5 ML 1,850,000$ 537,000$ 2,387,000$ 835,486$ 52,514$ 3,275,000$ 3,016,000$ -$ 259,000$ 176,120$ 82,880$ 500,000$ 655,000$ 2,120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6671 6.6 ML/d expansion at Brant St Pumping Station (existing building) (Zone B3) BUR P.S. 6.6 ML/d 525,000$ 10,500$ 535,500$ 187,719$ 11,781$ 735,000$ 677,000$ -$ 58,000$ 39,440$ 18,560$ 147,000$ 588,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6672 11.5 ML storage expansion at Brant St Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B1) BUR RES. 11.5 ML 8,510,000$ 470,200$ 8,980,200$ 3,143,236$ 197,564$ 12,321,000$ 11,348,000$ -$ 973,000$ 661,640$ 311,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,464,200$ 9,856,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6673 5.5 ML storage expansion at Mount Forest Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B1) BUR RES. 5.5 ML 4,070,000$ 81,400$ 4,151,400$ 1,453,269$ 91,331$ 5,696,000$ 5,246,000$ -$ 450,000$ 306,000$ 144,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,139,200$ 4,556,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6674 13.5 ML storage expansion at Washburn Reservoir (existing site) (Zone B1) BUR RES. 13.5 ML 9,990,000$ 199,800$ 10,189,800$ 3,566,024$ 224,176$ 13,980,000$ 11,464,000$ -$ 2,516,000$ 1,710,880$ 805,120$ 2,796,000$ 11,184,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6704 200 mm WM on Brock Ave from Elgin Street to Lakeshore Rd BUR WM 200 mm 212 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ 325,000$ 221,000$ 104,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 325,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6705 200 mm WM on Regina Drive from Maple Avenue to Ecole Renaissance Schoolyard BUR WM 200 mm 176 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 271,000$ -$ -$ 271,000$ 184,280$ 86,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 271,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6706 250 mm WM on Bellview Rd from Maple Avenue to end BUR WM 250 mm 114 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 309,000$ -$ -$ 309,000$ 210,120$ 98,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 309,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6707 300 mm WM on Lakeshore Rd between Nelson Avenue and Burlington Avenue BUR WM 300 mm 229 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 869,000$ -$ -$ 869,000$ 590,920$ 278,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 869,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6708 300 mm WM on Elizabeth Street from James Street to approximately 15 m north BUR WM 300 mm 15 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 23,800$ 11,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6709 300 mm WM on Plains Rd East from north of Grandview Rd to twinned section on Plains BUR WM 300 mm 982 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,678,000$ -$ -$ 2,678,000$ 1,821,040$ 856,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,678,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6710 300 mm WM on Plains Road East (Twinning adjacent to 6709) BUR WM 300 mm 340 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 628,000$ -$ -$ 628,000$ 427,040$ 200,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 628,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6711 300 mm WM on Birchwood Avenue from Plains Rd East southwards towards Fairwood Place East BUR WM 300 mm 53 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 104,000$ -$ -$ 104,000$ 70,720$ 33,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 104,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6712 300 mm WM on Gallagher Rd from Plains Rd East to 160 m Northerly BUR WM 300 mm 127 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 239,000$ -$ -$ 239,000$ 162,520$ 76,480$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 239,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6713 300 mm WM on Downsview Rd from Plains Rd East to Dowland Crescent BUR WM 200 mm 53 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 223,000$ -$ -$ 223,000$ 151,640$ 71,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 223,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6714 300 mm WM on Brant from Fairview St to 180 m northerly BUR WM 300 mm 183 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 342,000$ -$ -$ 342,000$ 232,560$ 109,440$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 342,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6715 300 mm WM on Woodview Rd from Fairview Street to 100 m Northerly BUR WM 300 mm 96 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 181,000$ -$ -$ 181,000$ 123,080$ 57,920$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 181,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6716 200 mm WM from end of Commerce Court north to Fairview Street BUR WM 200 mm 96 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 268,000$ -$ -$ 268,000$ 182,240$ 85,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 268,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6717 300 mm WM on Fairview from Appleby to Taylor Crescent BUR WM 300 mm 377 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,137,000$ -$ -$ 1,137,000$ 773,160$ 363,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,137,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6718 300 mm WM on Oval Crescent heading due north from Fairview Street BUR WM 300 mm 137 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 170,000$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6719300 mm WM on Main St. from Ontario St. to Easement, on Easement from Main St. to Nipissing Rd and on Nipissing Rd from Easement to 251 Nipissing Rd.

MIL WM 300 mm 1034 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,335,000$ -$ -$ 2,335,000$ 1,587,800$ 747,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,335,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6720 300 mm WM on Childs Drive from Ontario Street North to Robertson Crescent (Eastern entrance) MIL WM 300 mm 951 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,716,000$ -$ -$ 1,716,000$ 1,166,880$ 549,120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,716,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6721 300 mm WM on Ontario Street North from Main Street East to Parkway Drive East MIL WM 300 mm 980 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,787,000$ -$ -$ 1,787,000$ 1,215,160$ 571,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,787,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6722 300 mm WM on Woodward Avenue between Martin Steet and Ontario Street North MIL WM 300 mm 703 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,919,000$ -$ -$ 1,919,000$ 1,304,920$ 614,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,919,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6723 400 mm WM on Bronte St between Main Street West and Barton Street MIL WM 400 mm 551 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,134,000$ -$ -$ 1,134,000$ 771,120$ 362,880$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,134,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6724 300 mm WM on Main Street East East between James Street and Martin Street MIL WM 300 mm 292 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 538,000$ -$ -$ 538,000$ 365,840$ 172,160$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 538,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6725 300 mm WM on Laurier Avenue between Bronte Street and Commercial Street MIL WM 300 mm 1003 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,278,000$ -$ -$ 2,278,000$ 1,549,040$ 728,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,278,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6726 300 mm WM on Sovereign between Bronte Rd and East Street OAK WM 300 mm 721 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,652,000$ -$ -$ 2,652,000$ 1,803,360$ 848,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,652,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6727 300 mm WM on Ontario/East Street between Bronte Rd and Marine Drive OAK WM 300 mm 640 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,060,000$ -$ -$ 2,060,000$ 1,400,800$ 659,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,060,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6728 300 mm WM on Cowan Between Kerr Street and Inglewood Drive OAK WM 300 mm 87 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,000$ -$ -$ 611,000$ 415,480$ 195,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6729 300 mm WM on Deane between Kerr Street and Felan Ave OAK WM 300 mm 291 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 981,000$ -$ -$ 981,000$ 667,080$ 313,920$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 981,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6730 300 mm WM on Normandy between Kerr Street and Queen Mary Drive OAK WM 300 mm 354 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 651,000$ -$ -$ 651,000$ 442,680$ 208,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 651,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6731 300 mm WM on Forsythe between Rebecca Street and Burnet Street OAK WM 300 mm 315 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 577,000$ -$ -$ 577,000$ 392,360$ 184,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 577,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6732 300 mm replacement on Easement from Rosetta Street to Victoria Street HHGEO WM 300 mm 275 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 507,000$ -$ -$ 507,000$ 344,760$ 162,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 507,000$ -$ -$ -$

6733 300 mm replacement on Cross Street from Guelph Street to Main Street HHGEO WM 300 mm 113 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 136,000$ 64,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ -$ -$

6734 300 mm in Trafalgar Road between Thompson Drive and Stewartown Rd HHGEO WM 300 mm 230 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 426,000$ -$ -$ 426,000$ 289,680$ 136,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 426,000$ -$

6735 300 mm replacement on Guelph Street between Mountainview Rd North and Sinclair Ave HHGEO WM 300 mm 788 m -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,424,000$ -$ -$ 1,424,000$ 968,320$ 455,680$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,424,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total Distribution - Built Boundary 89,714,000$ 53,841,000$ -$ 35,873,000$ 24,393,640$ 11,479,360$ 5,845,000$ 12,830,000$ 10,940,000$ -$ 3,306,000$ 10,994,800$ 28,261,200$ 3,728,000$ 342,000$ 2,741,000$ 3,957,000$ -$ 2,816,000$ -$ 1,592,000$ 1,228,000$ 507,000$ 200,000$ 426,000$ -$

957,213,000$ 103,534,000$ 124,347,000$ 729,332,000$ 530,488,240$ 198,843,760$ 117,171,600$ 71,571,000$ 186,089,400$ 40,514,200$ 162,598,600$ 25,888,000$ 50,355,000$ 22,782,200$ 12,911,600$ 57,924,200$ 42,084,800$ 30,594,800$ 21,909,000$ 10,994,400$ 83,177,200$ 12,565,200$ 617,000$ 6,818,800$ 536,000$ 110,000$ TOTAL

Distribution - Built Boundary

Total Distribution - Greenfield

6608

6662

6664

6603

6605

6666

6661

6640

6616

6660

6628

6627

6600

6607

6665

66116615

6635

6622

6606

66106612

6597

6621

6609

6692

6623 66

366619

6631

6625

6634

6630

6618

6629

6617

6645

6654

6637

6647

6655

6690

6650

6657

6614

6656

6613

6643

6658

6633

6642

6626

6624

6639

6620

6632

6691

6598

6652

6659

6638

6667

6653

6688

6663

6641

6651

6644

6648

6649

6646

6604

6689

6318

4985

5875

5868

5881

5867

5627

5632

5850

5860

5862

5870 58

76

5633

6362

3700

639837

86/63

65

5882

82

4976

/6364

4983

/6444

3812/6360

5855/6370

5883

5853

5857/6375

3713/6443

5934

/6368

5859/6376

4977

3837

4978

5880

3818

5927

5525

3844

5861

5526

5320

5948

5866

5863

5879

5321

5865

4979

5864

3846

5852

6374

5872

5634

5851/6366

5856

5533

5947

5926

5961

5873

5534

5322

5319

5949

4975

6721

6725

6709

6720

6719

6735

6726

6722

6723

6727

6717

67306710

6731

6724

6729

6732

6734

6707

6704

671467

13

6705

671867

12

6706

6733

67166715

6728

6711

6708

")

$+

H

")

#*#*

")

#*

$+

")

") ")

")

")

#*

#*")

H

$+

#*#*

$+

6670

6601

6671

6669

6602

66746672

6673

6699/6700/6770

6702

6698

6696

6693

6694

6695/6668

6697

6437/6590

97

6675

6680/6681/6682/6683/6684

6701

#*

#*

#*

#*

")

")

$+

#*

#*

")

H

$+

$+

H

")

H

$+H

54

59626863

64/6367

3817

4980

3699

5061

3838

3824/5951/6372

5935

5719

5720/5757/6440

57186435

5205/5716/5717

6439

")

")

")

")

")

") ")

")

")

!(

")

")")

")

")

^

^

")

")

!(

^

^

H

H

H

HH

H

H

H

HH

H

H

H

$+

$+

$+

$+

$+

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

$+

Moore Park PS

O-4 ET

Kelso PSKelso WPP

Burloak WPP

Kelso Well

Oakville WPP

4th Line Well

Todd Rd Tower

Georgetown WPP

Burlington WPP

Hufnagel Wells

Davidson Well

Cedarvale Well

Moore (O-3) Res

Baillie (B-4) PS

Kitchen (O-3) PS

Walker's Line PS

Lindsay Court Well

Norval Standpipe

Churchill Rd Res

Milton (M-5L) ET

Bailie (B-2) Res

8th Line (O-3) PS

Washburn (B-2) PS

Beaufort (B-5) PS

Tyandaga (B-4) PS

8th Line (O-4) PS

Washburn (B-3) PS

Prospect Park WPP

22nd Sideroad Res

Kitchen (O-1) Res

Davis Rd. (O-2) PS

Brant St. (B-3) PS

Kingsway (B-1A) PS

Beaufort (B-4) Res

McCraney (O-1) Res

Washburn (B-1) Res

Tyandaga (B-3) Res

8th Line (O-2) Res

Prospect Park Well

Walker's Line Well

Princess Anne Well

Brant St. (B-1) Res

Main St. (M-5G) Res

Campbellville Well

Waterdown (B-1B) PS

Headon Rd. (B-3) Res

Waterdown (B-1A) Res

Mount Forest (B-2) PSMount Forest (B-1) Res

Appleby Line (B-2) Res

Waterdown (B-1B) Standpipe

Burnhamthorpe Rd. Elevated Tank

Bra

nt

St

O3

M4L

M5L

O1

B1

O2B2

O4

B3

G6G

G6L

B1A

B4

M5G

A9G

M5L

B5

O2A

G5G

B3A

G7G

B5A

B4AB1B

B5B

B2QEW

Hwy 401

Hwy 7

Hwy 403

Hw

y 6

Guelph St

Guelph St W

QE

W

Hwy 403

Hwy 7

QE

W

Hwy 401

Hw

y 403

Hw

y 403

Six

th L

ine

No 15 Siderd

Wa

lke

r'S

Lin

e

Fift

h L

ine

Fo

urt

h L

ine

Se

con

d L

ine

No 32 Siderd

New St

No 5 Siderd

Tw

iss

Rd

No 25 Siderd

Du

blin

Lin

e

Rebecca St

Fairview St

North Service Rd

Mainway

Ten

th L

ine

Fir

st L

ine

Lakeshore Rd

Speers Rd

Kin

g R

d

Lakeshore Rd W

Main St E

Milb

uro

ug

h L

ine

Campbellville Rd

Ce

da

r S

pri

ng

s R

d

Ap

ple

by

Lin

e

Harvester Rd

No 10 Siderd

No 20 Siderd

Guelph St

Win

sto

n C

hu

rch

ill B

lvd

Cornwall Rd

Th

om

ps

on

Rd

S

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Ke

rr St

Upper Middle Rd

Britannia Rd

No 17 Siderd

No 1 Siderd

Lakeshore Rd E

Na

ssa

ga

we

ya-E

squ

es

ing

Tlin

e

Steeles Ave W

No 30 Siderd

Bra

nt

St

Th

ird

Lin

e

Mc

Niv

en

Rd

Colling Rd

North Service Rd W

Kilbride St

Plains Rd W

Be

ll S

cho

ol

Lin

e

Wa

terd

ow

n R

d

Kelso Rd

Fo

rd D

r

Ma

in S

t S

Nin

th L

ine

Gu

elp

h L

ine

No 3 Siderd

Pe

ru R

d

Lower Base Line E

Bro

nte

Rd

Mai

n S

t

Ma

ple Ave

Lower Base Line

No 14 Siderd

River Dr

Esq

ue

sin

g L

ine

Bu

rlo

ak

Dr

Plains Rd E

Blin

d L

ine

Na

ssa

ga

we

ya-P

us

chlin

ch T

line

Mo

un

tain

vie

w R

d S

No 2 Siderd

Royal Windsor Dr

Bo

sto

n C

hu

rch

Rd

North

Ser

vice R

d E

No 4 Siderd

Bro

nte

St

S

Ch

art

we

ll R

d

Ma

in S

t N

Mill St W

Main St W

On

tari

o S

t S

Wyecroft Rd

Clayhill Rd

Lower Base Line W

Ma

rtin

St

Mo

rris

on

Rd

Tra

falg

ar R

d

Fallbrook Trail

North Shore Blvd E

Co

nfe

de

rati

on

St

Nottinghill G

ate

Ma

ple

Gro

ve

Dr

No 8 Siderd

Auburn Rd

Reid Siderd

Kingsway Dr

No 22 Siderd

South Service Rd E

Re

yno

lds S

t

Ho

rnb

y R

d

Bro

nte

St

N

No 28 Siderd

Wildwood Rd

Industrial St

No 27 Siderd

Queen St

On

tari

o S

t N

Cre

ws

on

s L

ine

Burnhamthorpe Rd W

Britannia Rd W

Leighland Ave

South Service Rd W

Eas

tpor

t Dr

He

nd

ers

on

Rd

Tre

ma

ine

Rd

Th

om

ps

on

Rd

NC

hu

rch

ill R

d S

Cross Ave

Sh

erw

oo

d H

eig

hts

Dr

Ch

urc

hill

Rd

N

So

uth

Se

rvice R

d

Panin Rd

Queensway Dr

Glen Lawson Rd

Prince St

Fra

ser

Dr

No 12 Siderd

Se

ne

ca

Ave

Campbell Ave W

Iroquois Shore Rd

Josh

ua

s C

ree

k D

r

Sysc

on

Rd

South Sheridan Way

La

salle

Pa

rk R

d

Mountain Brow Rd

No 1 Siderd

Britannia Rd

Six

th L

ine

Britannia Rd

Ten

th L

ine

Campbellville Rd

Ap

ple

by

Lin

e

Th

ird

Lin

e

Fift

h L

ine

Third Line

No 30 Siderd

Six

th L

ine

No 3 Siderd

Lower Base Line W

South Service Rd W

Th

ird

Lin

e

No 17 Siderd

Milb

uro

ug

h L

ine

No 10 Siderd

Wa

lke

r'S

Lin

e

Be

ll S

cho

ol

Lin

e

No 20 Siderd

No 2 Siderd

Ma

in S

t S

South Service Rd E

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Th

ird

Lin

e

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Nin

th L

ine

South Service Rd

No 3 Siderd

No 2 Siderd

No 27 Siderd

Ten

th L

ine

Plains Rd E

Du

blin

Lin

e

Six

th L

ine

South Service Rd W

No 22 Siderd

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Milb

uro

ug

h L

ine

No 22 Siderd

Fift

h L

ine

Fo

urt

h L

ine

Map

le A

ve

Fo

urt

h L

ine

Fir

st L

ine

No 17 Siderd

Fift

h L

ine

Na

ssa

ga

we

ya-P

us

chlin

ch T

line

Eig

hth

Lin

e

No 17 Siderd

Wyecroft Rd

Fo

urt

h L

ine

Fo

urt

h L

ine

Milb

uro

ug

h L

ine

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Steeles Ave W

No 1 Siderd

Na

ssa

ga

we

ya-P

us

chlin

ch T

line

Ten

th L

ine

First L

ine

Th

ird

Lin

e

Tra

falg

ar

Rd

Gu

elp

h L

ine

Tre

ma

ine

Rd

Ap

ple

by

Lin

e

Derry Rd

Re

g R

d 2

5

Dundas St

Steeles Ave

Derry Rd W

Dundas St W

Nin

th L

ine

Britannia Rd W

Bro

nte

Rd

Dundas St E

Bra

nt

St

Do

rva

l Dr

Derry Rd E

No 10 Siderd

Upper Middle Rd E

Ford Dr

Win

sto

n C

hu

rch

ill B

lvd

No 20 Siderd

Upper Middle Rd W

Ne

yag

aw

a B

lvd

Britannia Rd E

Steeles Ave E

Maple Ave

Bu

rlo

ak

Dr

Burnhamthorpe Rd E

Burnhamthorpe Rd W

No 32 Siderd

Ma

rtin

St

Ma

in S

t S

Upper Middle Rd

Steeles Ave W

Ma

in S

t N

Fo

urt

h L

ine

James Snow Pky

Nin

th L

ine

Burnhamthorpe Rd W

Re

g R

d 2

5

Gu

elp

h L

ine

Re

g R

d 2

5

Win

sto

n C

hu

rch

ill B

lvd

Tra

falg

ar

Rd

Win

sto

n C

hu

rch

ill B

lvd

Hwy 407Hwy 407

Halton Preferred Water Servicing Strategy

LegendExisting Infrastructure

#* Water Pumping Station

H Water Well

!( Water Standpipe

") Water Reservoir

$+ Water Purification Plant

^ Elevated Water Tower

Existing Watermain

Watermain

Previously Approved Infrastructure

#* Water Pumping Station

H Water Well

$+ Water Purification Plant

") Water Reservoir

Proposed/Upgrade Infrastructure

#* Water Pumping Station

H Water Well

$+ Water Purification Plant

") Water Reservoir

Watermain

Distribution-Built Boundary Watermain

Funded Infrastructure

#* Water Pumping Station

") Water Reservoir

Funded Project - Watermain (2008 MP Projects)

Existing Milton Groundwater Servicing

Existing Central Milton Groundwater Service Area Boundary

Water Pressure Zones

Proposed Lake Base Service Area

Lake OntarioHamilton Harbour

August 20111:40,000

601140562-349-W

X

X

XX

X

X

X

³

Artificial Recharge6678/6679

Artificial Recharge6676/6677

XX Existing Interregional connections

New Interregional connections

PRV

2012 Development Charges UpdateFigure 11

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 47

6. Wastewater Servicing Requirements

6.1 Wastewater Service Areas

The service areas were reviewed for each project through determination of the project’s location as well as its relationship to the overall system operation. Evaluation of the planning data and ultimately the project requirements was completed through summarizing the wastewater flows for the following geographic areas:

Wastewater plant drainage areas (i.e., serviced by each of the WWTPs respectively in South Halton, Acton and Georgetown)

Localized catchment areas (i.e., serviced by pumping stations and trunk sewers)

Localized TSZs (i.e., serviced by local trunk sewers).

The wastewater drainage areas are depicted in Figure 12. As noted, the drainage areas are identified by the ultimate outlet being the WWTP. The drainage areas are generally defined by the topography naturally draining to the respective WWTP as well as the service areas pumped or directed to a gravity system ultimately flowing to the plant. As such, the drainage areas are identified as Skyway, Oakville Southeast, Oakville Southwest, Mid-Halton, Milton, Acton and Georgetown.

6.2 Wastewater Flow Projections Based on the BPE June 2011 and Design Criteria, the Halton Wastewater Flow Projections have been established and are summarized in Table 19.

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

#

#

#

##

#

##

Halton Hills

Milton

Oakville

Burlington

NS

Skyway

Mid Halton

Mid Halton

Milton

Oakvil le SE

Oakville SW

Halton Hills

Acton

Mid Halton

G Williams

QEW

Hwy 407

Hwy 401

Tra

falg

ar

Rd

Ap

ple

by L

ine

Six

th L

ine

No 15 Siderd

Wa

lker

'S L

ine

Tre

mai

ne

Rd

Gu

elp

h Li

ne

Fif t

h L

ine

Fou

rth

Lin

e

Se

cond

Lin

e

Hwy 7

Derry Rd

New St

Reg

Rd

25

No 5 Siderd

Twis

s R

d

Dundas St

No 25 Siderd

Dub

lin L

ine

Hwy 403

Bra

nt

St

Steeles Ave

Rebecca St

Fairview St

No 20 Siderd

North Service Rd

Bro

nte

Rd

Derry Rd W

Mainway

Ten

th L

ine

Firs

t L

ine

Lakeshore Rd

Milb

uro

ugh

Lin

e

Dundas St W

Guelph St

Speers Rd

Nin

th L

ine

Kin

g R

d

Lakeshore Rd W

Main St E

Win

sto

n C

hur

chill

Blv

d

Britannia Rd W

For

d D

r

Campbellville R d

Ced

ar S

prin

gs

Rd

Dundas St E

Upper Middle R d

Harvester Rd

Dorva

l Dr

No 10 Siderd

Cornwall Rd

Tho

mps

on R

d S

Hw

y 6

Derry Rd E

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Ke

rr St

Britannia Rd

No 17 Siderd

Upper Middle R d W

No 1 Siderd

Lakeshore Rd E

Upper Middle R d E

Nas

sag

awe

ya-E

squ

esin

g T

line

Steeles Ave W

No 30 Siderd

Bu

rloa

k D

r

Thi

rd L

ine

Ma

rtin

St

Mc

Niv

en R

d

Ney

ag

awa

Blv

d

Britannia Rd E

Steeles Ave E

Colling Rd

North Service Rd W

Kilbride St

Maple Ave

Plains Rd W

Be

ll S

cho

ol L

ine

Wa

terd

ow

n R

d

Kelso Rd

No 3 Siderd

Pe

ru R

d

Lower Base Line E

Main St

Lower Base Line

No 14 Siderd

River Dr

Burnhamthorpe Rd E

Esq

ues

ing

Lin

e

Plains Rd E

Blin

d L

ine

Nas

sag

awe

ya-P

usc

hlin

ch T

line

Mo

unt

ain

vie

w R

d S

No 32 Siderd

No 2 Siderd

Royal Windsor Dr

Bo

sto

n C

hurc

h R

d

North Service Rd E

No 4 Siderd

Bro

nte

St

S

Cha

rtw

ell

Rd

Ma

in S

t N

Mill St W

Main St W

On

tario

St S

Wyecroft Rd

Clayhill Rd

Lower Base Line W

Burnhamthorpe Rd W

Ma

in S

t S

Mo

rris

on R

d

Fallbrook Trail

North Shore Blvd E

Notting

hill G

ate

Ea

stp

ort

Dr

No 8 Siderd

Auburn Rd

Reid Siderd

No 22 Siderd

Reyn

old

s St

Hor

nby

Rd

Bron

te S

t N

No 28 Siderd

No 27 Siderd

Cre

wso

ns L

ine

South Service Rd W

Hen

ders

on

Rd

Tho

mps

on R

d N

Chu

rchill Rd

S

Cross Ave

South Service Rd

Miss

issaga

St

No 12 Siderd

Se

neca

Ave

Adam

son

St N

Campbell Ave W

James St

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Thi

rd L

ine

Hwy 407

QE

W

Reg

Rd

25

Steeles Ave W

Campbellville R d

Firs

t L

ine

No 2 Siderd

Milb

uro

ugh

Lin

e

Win

sto

n C

hur

chill

Blv

d

Hwy 7

Gu

elp

h Li

ne

Britannia Rd

Fift

h L

ine

No 27 Siderd

Thi

rd L

ine

No 10 Siderd

Fou

rth

Lin

e

Six

th L

ine

No 22 Siderd

Six

th L

ine

Bu

rloa

k D

r

Fif t

h L

ine

Ten

th L

ine

Reg

Rd

25

Thi

rd L

ine

Six

th L

ine

No 30 Siderd

Fou

rth

Lin

e

Hwy 403

No 32 Siderd

No 17 Siderd

No 22 Siderd

Thi

rd L

ine

Nas

sag

awe

ya-P

usc

hlin

ch T

line

Ma

in S

t S

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Wa

lker

'S L

ine

Be

ll S

cho

ol L

ine

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Win

sto

n C

hur

chill

Blv

d

Ma

in S

t S

Ma

in S

t N

Nin

th L

ine

Ten

th L

ine

Nin

th L

ine

Dub

lin L

ine

Hwy 401

Hw

y 403

Fou

rth

Lin

e

Eig

hth

Lin

e

QE

W

Tra

falg

ar

Rd

Eig

hth

Lin

e

No 2 SiderdTe

nth

Lin

e

Nin

th L

ine

No 17 Siderd

Britannia Rd

Plains Rd E

Hw

y 403

No 20 Siderd

No 1 Siderd

Firs

t L

ine

Britannia Rd W

Ma

ple A

ve

Fift

h L

ine

No 3 Siderd

Burnhamthorpe Rd W

Skyway WWTP

Mid-Halton WWTP

Oakville SW WWTP

Oakville SE WWTP

Norval

Acton WWTP

Milton WWTP

Georgetown WWTP

Sustainable Halton

³

1:180,000July 2011

File: 60114062-189-WW

Halton WastewaterFuture Drainage Areas

±Legend# Existing Wastewater Pumping Station

$ Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant

Existing Wastewater Sewer

Existing Forcemain

Study Area Boundary

Drainage AreaActon

Glenn Williams

Halton Hills

Mid Halton

Milton

Norval

Oakville SE

Oakville SW

Skyway

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 49

Table 19. Wastewater Flow Projections

DESIGN CRITERIA (Lpcd)

Residential 365

Industrial 410

Commercial 260

Institutional 135

Population Industrial

Employees

Commercial Employees

Institutional Employees

Drainage Area 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Acton 10,036 9,796 10,379 12,874 13,981 1,467 1,505 1,634 1,862 2,004 1,260 1,490 1,618 1,751 1,861 1,064 1,090 1,102 1,131 1,206

Georgetown 36,637 38,913 42,154 44,332 50,256 4,737 4,781 4,903 5,036 5,233 5,272 5,343 5,543 5,713 6,175 2,720 2,720 2,722 2,765 2,911

Milton 18,299 20,812 25,637 30,383 35,254 16,516 19,220 21,156 22,291 23,933 10,816 15,201 18,951 20,108 20,693 3,878 4,915 6,134 6,943 7,112

Mid Halton 144,998 198,724 248,462 294,470 335,549 7,127 13,783 23,490 33,495 46,048 17,349 26,982 37,858 45,201 55,859 10,819 13,305 17,132 21,796 23,840

Oakville SE 39,451 39,400 39,495 39,503 40,639 21,623 23,264 23,293 23,324 23,847 8,083 9,032 9,564 9,564 9,926 2,788 2,908 3,262 3,315 3,410

Oakville SW 52,137 55,107 61,713 67,813 72,742 15,477 15,503 15,530 15,570 16,140 14,256 16,190 17,577 18,090 19,782 3,875 4,038 4,265 4,347 4,596

Skyway 172,769 174,448 177,781 180,938 185,183 37,608 40,155 41,263 41,731 42,620 55,425 57,648 60,816 61,596 62,496 4,712 5,141 5,469 5,532 5,561

G Williams 1,656 1,694 1,813 1,838 1,852 10 10 10 10 10 18 18 18 18 20 23 23 23 25 25

Norval 323 345 356 367 367 33 33 33 33 33 21 21 21 57 57 38 38 38 41 41

Not Serviced 16,741 16,468 16,303 16,376 16,711 2,124 2,236 2,296 2,330 2,372 1,168 1,244 1,269 1,322 1,427 627 653 694 715 762

TOTAL 493,045 555,707 624,094 688,895 752,537 106,721 120,492 133,608 145,681 162,240 113,667 133,170 153,236 163,420 178,296 30,544 34,831 40,839 46,610 49,463

Projected Flows by Area (ML/D)

Projected Flows to WWTPs

as per Strategy (ML/D)

Drainage Area 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 WWTP Drainage Area 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031

Acton 4.66 4.66 4.96 6.00 6.50 Acton 4.66 4.66 4.96 6.00 6.50

Georgetown 18.43 19.30 20.59 21.49 23.87 Georgetown 18.72 20.26 16.35 17.11 19.34

Milton 15.47 18.77 22.47 25.08 27.70 Milton1 15.47 18.77 18.50 18.50 18.50

Mid Halton 58.14 83.32 108.79 132.23 155.42 Mid Halton 58.14 83.32 118.45 144.67 170.64

Oakville SE 26.75 27.67 27.90 27.93 28.66 Oakville SE 26.75 27.67 27.90 27.93 28.66

Oakville SW 36.14 37.76 40.57 42.96 45.46 Oakville SW 36.14 37.76 40.57 42.96 45.46

Skyway 122.59 124.88 127.42 128.97 131.12 Skyway 122.59 124.88 127.42 128.97 131.12

Glen Williams 0.03 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.10 TOTAL2 282.47 317.31 354.15 386.13 420.23

Norval 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.03 1 Milton WWTP is capped at 18.5 ML/d and Mid Halton WWTP includes the flows diverted from Milton and Georgetown

Not Serviced 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.23 2 Total Projected Flows to WWTPs include Catch-up

TOTAL 282.26 316.43 352.80 384.82 419.10

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 50

7. Wastewater Capital Program

The complete wastewater capital program for the servicing strategies developed under the South Halton Master Plan Update and the North Halton Studies is provided in Table 20. This table provides Regional IPFS IDs, project descriptions, cost estimating details, and calculation of DC criteria. The preferred wastewater servicing strategy is depicted in Figure 13 and is based on the following key area components: Milton Lake Based Wastewater Servicing

Milton lake-based wastewater service area also includes the areas generally outside the central core of the community.

Wastewater is conveyed south to the Mid-Halton WWTP. Wastewater from the remaining areas is conveyed to the Milton WWTP. Excess flows to Milton WWTP beyond rated capacity for average and peak flows are diverted to the Mid-Halton WWTP.

Components of the servicing strategy for the Milton lake-based service area include:

BPII servicing will be initially conveyed to the existing Milton system and ultimately to the Britannia Road infrastructure

Convey and pump the Boyne Survey Area Phase III flows to the Hwy 25 trunk sewer Provide new trunk infrastructure for the east Milton servicing down Trafalgar Road, along Britannia Road

and to Lower Baseline Road Provide phasing opportunity for the post 2021 flows along Britannia Road Continue to convey flows to the Hwy 25 trunk sewer New section of the Hwy 25 trunk sewer south of Boyne WWPS Provide additional WWTP capacity at Mid-Halton Flows from Milton Education Village and lands east of Tremaine Rd will flow down Tremaine Rd and

along Lower Baseline before connecting to the new Hwy 25 trunk sewer.

Core Milton Servicing

Wastewater is conveyed south to the Milton Wastewater Treatment Plant for the northwest areas of the Milton core. Remaining areas direct flows to Mid-Halton Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Increased flow to the Milton plant can be diverted to the Mid-Halton Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Components of the servicing strategy include:

Expansion and Reconstruction of Fulton Pumping Station Twin forcemain between Fulton Pumping Station and Milton Wastewater Treatment Plant

Milton & Halton Hills 401 Employment Corridor Wastewater Servicing

Milton/Halton Hills 401 Corridor lake-based wastewater service area includes the areas generally along Steeles Ave.

Wastewater is conveyed south to the Mid-Halton WWTP.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 51

Components of the servicing strategy for the Milton/Halton Hills 401 Corridor lake-based service area include:

Two existing wastewater pumping stations along Steeles Ave to provide staged implementation and minimize sewer depth and convey flows west along Steeles Ave and south through the existing Milton Gravity system.

The eastern limits of the corridor will continue to pump flows west to the existing infrastructure. Once the new Trafalgar trunk sewer is in place, these flows will be diverted south allowing the post 2021 service areas in the western limits of the corridor to be serviced by existing infrastructure.

New Hwy 25 trunk sewer Provide additional WWTP capacity at Mid-Halton

North Oakville (East Growth Area) Wastewater Servicing

The North Oakville (East Growth Areas) are generally located east of Sixteen Mile Creek, North of Dundas Street, South of Hwy 407 and West of 9th Line.

The wastewater servicing strategy for these lands is to convey wastewater flows south to Dundas Street trunk sewer and west to the Third Line trunk sewer which continues to convey flows to Mid-Halton WWTP.

Components of the servicing strategy for North Oakville include:

Multiple wastewater pumping stations to provide staged implementation, minimize sewer depth and service areas with topographical constraints.

Sub-trunk sewers conveying flows south to the trunk sewer along Dundas Street Provide a wastewater pumping station and Forcemain to convey flows across Sixteen Mile Creek Provide additional WWTP capacity at Mid-Halton

North Oakville (West Growth Area) Wastewater Servicing

The North Oakville (West Growth Areas) are generally located west of Sixteen Mile Creek. The wastewater servicing strategy for these lands is, for the eastern most section, to convey wastewater

flows to the Third Line trunk sewer which continues to convey flows to Mid-Halton WWTP and, for the western most section, convey wastewater flows east along Dundas Street then south to existing sewers near Bronte Road ultimately to Mid-Halton WWTP.

Components of the servicing strategy for North Oakville include:

New trunk sewers along Dundas Street Provide additional WWTP capacity at Mid-Halton

Burlington (Central) Wastewater Servicing

The Burlington (Central Areas) include all areas in Burlington south of the Hwy 407 and Dundas Street excluding the North Aldershot areas.

The wastewater servicing strategy for these lands is to convey wastewater flows to the Skyway WWTP. This is achieved primarily through gravity sewers with localized wastewater pumping stations.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011 52

Components of the servicing strategy for Burlington include:

Maximize available capacity within existing infrastructure. Localized servicing upgrades. Provide additional WWTP capacity at Skyway WWTP.

North Aldershot Wastewater Servicing

The North Aldershot service areas include all areas in Burlington generally west of the QEW. The wastewater servicing strategy for these lands is to convey wastewater flows to the Skyway WWTP.

This is achieved primarily through gravity sewers with localized wastewater pumping stations. Isolated areas maintain private servicing.

Components of the servicing strategy for North Aldershot include:

Maximize available capacity within existing infrastructure. Provide new trunk gravity servicing through North Aldershot to existing trunk sewers near Waterdown

Road and the Hwy 403. Localized wastewater pumping stations may be required. Provide additional WWTP capacity at Skyway WWTP.

Georgetown Wastewater Servicing

Maximize existing service areas to the existing Georgetown WWTP. Maintain existing process capacity at Georgetown WWTP.

Georgetown South and Southwest Georgetown

Areas within Georgetown South and Southwest Georgetown generally lie south of the 15th Sideroad and Silver Creek.

The wastewater servicing and strategies for areas is to convey flows south to the Mid-Halton WWTP. Components of this servicing strategy include:

New wastewater pumping stations to service the areas with topographical constraints and to pump flows across creek crossings and minimize sewer depth.

Trunk sewers from Georgetown down Eighth Line and Trafalgar Road to convey flows through East Milton to the Hwy 25 trunk sewer.

Acton Wastewater Servicing

Continue to provide wastewater servicing for the community to the Acton WWTP Expand capacity at the Acton WWTP Provide local servicing improvements to service new growth as required

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

Table 20 ‐ Wastewater Capital Program

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

4810 Long Term Biosolids Management and Implementation Plan REG STUDY 20,420,597$ -$ 20,420,597$ -$ 359,403$ 20,780,000$ 12,260,000$ -$ 8,520,000$ 5,878,800$ 2,641,200$ 1,780,000$ 19,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5095 Mid Halton WWTP Odour Control Studies (OAK) - $87,000/year for 20 years OAK STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,740,000$ -$ -$ 1,740,000$ 1,200,600$ 539,400$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$ 87,000$

5726 Acton WWTP Expansion to 7 ML/d HHACT WWTP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 22,890,000$ -$ -$ 22,890,000$ 15,794,100$ 7,095,900$ -$ 22,890,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5729 Halton Wastewater Master Plan (REG) - $880,000 in 2015, 2020, 2025 and 2030 REG STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,520,000$ -$ -$ 3,520,000$ 2,428,800$ 1,091,200$ -$ -$ -$ 880,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 880,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 880,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 880,000$ -$

5945 Mid-Halton new effluent sewer/outfall - Construction OAK WWTP -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 90,000,000$ -$ 26,100,000$ 63,900,000$ 44,091,000$ 19,809,000$ 90,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6187 Wastewater Treatment Capacity Annual Monitoring Report (REG) - $45,000/year for 20 years REG STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 900,000$ -$ -$ 900,000$ 621,000$ 279,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$

6188 Wastewater Collection System Analysis (REG) - $110,000/year for 20 years REG STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ -$ -$ 2,200,000$ 1,518,000$ 682,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$ 110,000$

6380 2400 mm WWM on new 3rd Line from 700 m north of Dundas St to Dundas St - Construction OAK WWM 2400 mm 695 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,632,000$ -$ -$ 7,632,000$ 5,266,080$ 2,365,920$ 7,632,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6381 2400 mm WWM on new road alignment from Lower Base Line to 3rd Line (700 m north of Dundas St) - Construction OAK WWM 2400 mm 4222 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 49,923,000$ -$ -$ 49,923,000$ 34,446,870$ 15,476,130$ 49,923,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6382 2100mm WWM on Regional Rd 25 from Boyne WWPS to Lower Base Line - Construction MIL WWM 2100 mm 2319 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14,755,000$ -$ -$ 14,755,000$ 10,180,950$ 4,574,050$ 14,755,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6383 Mid Halton WWTP Phase 4/5 expansion from 75 ML/d to 125 ML/d (OAK) - Construction OAK WWTP 50 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000,000$ -$ -$ 120,000,000$ 82,800,000$ 37,200,000$ 120,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6384 Mid Halton North Pumping Station Expansion - Construction OAK WWPS 2315 L/s -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13,500,000$ -$ -$ 13,500,000$ 9,315,000$ 4,185,000$ 13,500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6565 TP Offset Program HHACT STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,300,000$ -$ -$ 3,300,000$ 2,277,000$ 1,023,000$ 200,000$ 300,000$ 400,000$ 2,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6566 Black Creek Monitoring Program HHACT STUDY -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 550,000$ -$ -$ 550,000$ 379,500$ 170,500$ 100,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6568 900 mm WWM on 8th Line from 10th Side Rd to 5th Side Rd HHGEO WWM 900 mm 3097 3,498,943$ 794,574$ 4,293,518$ 1,503,025$ 94,457$ 5,891,000$ -$ -$ 5,891,000$ 4,064,790$ 1,826,210$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,178,200$ 4,712,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6569 900 mm WWM on 8th Line from 5th Side Rd to Steeles Ave HHGEO WWM 900 mm 3083 3,483,126$ 794,258$ 4,277,384$ 1,497,513$ 94,102$ 5,869,000$ -$ -$ 5,869,000$ 4,049,610$ 1,819,390$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,173,800$ 4,695,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6572 1050 mm WWM on Steeles Ave from 8th Line to Crossing Easement HH401 WWM 1050 mm 375 1,254,373$ 25,087$ 1,279,460$ 447,392$ 28,148$ 1,755,000$ -$ -$ 1,755,000$ 1,210,950$ 544,050$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 351,000$ 1,404,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6588 Mid-Halton WWTP expansion from 125 ML/d to 175 ML/d OAK WWTP 50 ML/d -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 93,304,000$ -$ -$ 93,304,000$ 64,379,760$ 28,924,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,866,080$ 16,794,720$ -$ 74,643,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total Capacity 458,509,000$ 12,260,000$ 26,100,000$ 420,149,000$ 289,902,810$ 130,246,190$ 298,132,000$ 42,482,000$ 692,000$ 3,572,000$ 2,158,080$ 19,789,720$ 11,104,000$ 74,935,200$ 1,172,000$ 292,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 1,122,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 242,000$ 1,122,000$ 242,000$

3706600 mm WWM crosing Dundas St and 600mm WWM on Dundas St from 900m west of Colonel William Parkway to Colonel William Parkway

OAK WWM 600 mm 884 2,151,218$ 767,577$ 2,918,795$ 1,021,992$ 64,213$ 4,005,000$ -$ -$ 4,005,000$ 2,843,550$ 1,161,450$ 4,005,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

4994 600 mm WWM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Dundas Street OAK WWM 600 mm 2690 1,750,623$ 2,535,377$ 4,286,000$ 1,499,708$ 94,292$ 5,880,000$ -$ -$ 5,880,000$ 4,174,800$ 1,705,200$ -$ -$ 1,176,000$ 4,704,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

4995 New 37 ML/d WWPS on Dundas St E approximately 550m west of Ninth Line (428 L/s) OAK WWPS 428 L/s 4,461,652$ 593,233$ 5,054,885$ 1,768,908$ 111,207$ 6,935,000$ -$ -$ 6,935,000$ 4,923,850$ 2,011,150$ -$ -$ 1,387,000$ 5,548,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5062 600 mm WWM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd West to Dundas Street OAK WWM 600 mm 2303 1,498,672$ 473,926$ 1,972,599$ 563,004$ 43,397$ 2,579,000$ -$ -$ 2,579,000$ 1,831,090$ 747,910$ -$ -$ 515,800$ 2,063,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5063 525 mm WWM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd West to Dundas Street OAK WWM 525 mm 2257 1,289,402$ 231,959$ 1,521,361$ 532,169$ 33,470$ 2,087,000$ -$ -$ 2,087,000$ 1,481,770$ 605,230$ 417,400$ 1,669,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5066 750 mm WWM on Fifth Line from new BPII WWPS (IPFS #5898) to Louis St Laurent Ave MIL WWM 750 mm 1014 960,603$ 294,121$ 1,254,724$ 438,672$ 27,604$ 1,721,000$ -$ -$ 1,721,000$ 1,221,910$ 499,090$ -$ -$ 344,200$ 1,376,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5067900 mm WWM on James Snow Parkway from Louis St Laurent Ave to Britannia Rd and 1200 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from Louis St Laurent Ave to Britannia Rd /Thompson Rd WWPS

MIL WWM 900mm / 1200 mm 4271 26,862,883$ 886,422$ 27,749,305$ 9,712,293$ 591,402$ 38,053,000$ -$ -$ 38,053,000$ 27,017,630$ 11,035,370$ -$ -$ 7,610,600$ 30,442,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

50683 x 450 mm WWFM from new WWPS (IPFS #5069) to 300 m east of R.R. 25 (Incl. portion of WWFM under 16 Mile Creek) - Design

MIL WWFM 450 mm 1000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 704,000$ -$ -$ 704,000$ 499,840$ 204,160$ 704,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5069 New 86 ML/d WWPS on Britannia Rd between 3rd Line and 16 Mile Creek (1000 L/s) - Design MIL WWPS 1000 L/s -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,633,000$ -$ -$ 1,633,000$ 1,159,430$ 473,570$ 1,633,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5900 675 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from 275 m west of Bronte Rd to 300 m west of Regional Rd 25 MIL WWM 675 mm 1330 1,115,695$ 540,522$ 1,656,217$ 579,347$ 36,437$ 2,272,000$ -$ -$ 2,272,000$ 1,613,120$ 658,880$ 454,400$ 1,817,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5905 375 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from east of Tremaine Rd to Project #5906 on new South Milton road alignment MIL WWM 375 mm 430 211,002$ 178,781$ 389,783$ 136,642$ 8,575$ 535,000$ -$ -$ 535,000$ 379,850$ 155,150$ 107,000$ 428,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5906 600 mm WWM on new Milton South road alignment from Britannia Rd to Tremaine Rd WWPS MIL WWM 600 mm 1544 1,004,611$ 464,045$ 1,468,656$ 514,033$ 32,310$ 2,015,000$ -$ -$ 2,015,000$ 1,430,650$ 584,350$ 403,000$ 1,612,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5907 300 mm WWM North Aldershot Servicing BURL WWM 300 mm 2090 2,881,065$ 229,760$ 3,110,825$ 1,088,737$ 68,438$ 4,268,000$ -$ -$ 4,268,000$ 3,030,280$ 1,237,720$ 4,268,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

5912 200 - 375 mm WWM on new Milton Phase 3 road alignment south to Britannia Rd MIL WWM 200 mm-375 mm 1342 658,697$ 13,174$ 671,871$ 235,348$ 14,781$ 922,000$ -$ -$ 922,000$ 654,620$ 267,380$ 184,400$ 737,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6114450 mm WWM on new road from west of Thompson Rd to Thompson Rd and 525 mm WWM on Thompson Rd from north of Britannia Rd to Britannia Rd

MIL WWM 450 mm / 525 mm 1725 958,185$ 209,530$ 1,167,715$ 408,596$ 25,690$ 1,602,000$ -$ -$ 1,602,000$ 1,137,420$ 464,580$ -$ -$ 320,400$ 1,281,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

61153 x 450 mm WWFM from new WWPS (IPFS #5069) to 300 m east of R.R. 25 (Incl. portion of WWFM under 16 Mile Creek) - Construction

MIL WWFM 450 mm 1000 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,121,000$ -$ -$ 6,121,000$ 4,345,910$ 1,775,090$ -$ -$ 6,121,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6116 750 mm WWM on Louis St Laurent from 5th Line to James Snow Pkwy MIL WWM 750 mm 699 1,922,395$ 313,357$ 2,235,753$ 782,061$ 49,187$ 3,067,000$ -$ -$ 3,067,000$ 2,177,570$ 889,430$ -$ -$ 613,400$ 2,453,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6143 300mm WWM on North Service Rd from 440m east of Waterdown Rd to 360m north of North Service Rd - Part of 5907 BURL WWM 300 mm -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 355,000$ 145,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6215 600 mm WWM on Neyagawa Blvd from Burnhamthorpe Rd to new internal North Oakville road, north of Dundas St OAK WWM 600 mm 1888 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ 2,840,000$ 1,160,000$ 800,000$ 3,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6378675 mm WWM on Dundas St from Prince Michael Dr to 8th Line and 750 mm WWM on Dundas St from 8th Ln to Oak Park Blvd - Construction

OAK WWM 675 mm/ 750 mm 1909 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,200,000$ -$ -$ 4,200,000$ 2,982,000$ 1,218,000$ 4,200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6379 2 x 400 mm WW Forcemains on Dundas St from new WWPS #4995 to Prince Michael Dr - Construction OAK WWFM 400 mm 800 -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,400,000$ -$ -$ 1,400,000$ 994,000$ 406,000$ 1,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6427 New 86 ML/d WWPS on Britannia Rd between 3rd Line and 16 Mile Creek (1000 L/s) - Construction MIL WWPS 1000 L/s -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 14,193,000$ -$ -$ 14,193,000$ 10,077,030$ 4,115,970$ -$ -$ 14,193,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6481 450 mm WWM on internal road parallel to Dundas St from west of 16 Mile Creek Bridge to 190 m east of Proudfoot Trail OAK WWM 450 mm 400 211,703$ 4,234$ 215,937$ 75,312$ 4,751$ 296,000$ -$ -$ 296,000$ 210,160$ 85,840$ 59,200$ 236,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6496 Twinned 250 mm WWFM from Norval WWPS to Argyll Rd HHGEO WWFM 250 mm 1292 548,667$ 97,042$ 645,710$ 226,085$ 14,206$ 886,000$ -$ -$ 886,000$ 629,060$ 256,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 177,200$ 708,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6497 300 mm WWM on Derry Rd from 8th Line to Trafalgar Rd MIL WWM 300 mm 1361 591,692$ 11,834$ 603,525$ 211,197$ 13,278$ 828,000$ -$ -$ 828,000$ 587,880$ 240,120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 165,600$ 662,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6498 450 mm WWM on new road from 8th Line to Trafalgar Rd MIL WWM 450 mm 1380 730,383$ 395,340$ 1,125,723$ 393,511$ 24,766$ 1,544,000$ -$ -$ 1,544,000$ 1,096,240$ 447,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 308,800$ 1,235,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6499 300 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from 8th Line to Trafalgar/ Britannia WWPS MIL WWM 300 mm 1370 595,543$ 186,915$ 782,458$ 274,328$ 17,214$ 1,074,000$ -$ -$ 1,074,000$ 762,540$ 311,460$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 214,800$ 859,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6500 600 mm WWM on 4th Line from new road to Lower Base Line WWPS MIL WWM 600 mm 1272 3,095,635$ 61,913$ 3,157,547$ 1,104,987$ 69,466$ 4,332,000$ -$ -$ 4,332,000$ 3,075,720$ 1,256,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 866,400$ 3,465,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6501 450 mm WWM on 4th Line from south of Britannia Rd to new road MIL WWM 450 mm 1021 2,300,865$ 236,383$ 2,537,248$ 887,933$ 55,819$ 3,481,000$ -$ -$ 3,481,000$ 2,471,510$ 1,009,490$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 696,200$ 2,784,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6502 525 mm WWM on Thompson Rd and new internal road from south of Britannia to 4th Line MIL WWM 525 mm 2241 1,280,268$ 437,948$ 1,718,216$ 600,983$ 37,801$ 2,357,000$ -$ -$ 2,357,000$ 1,673,470$ 683,530$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 471,400$ 1,885,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6503 300 mm WWM on 8th Line from north of Derry Rd to Derry Rd MIL WWM 300 mm 625 271,704$ 94,369$ 366,072$ 127,874$ 8,054$ 502,000$ -$ -$ 502,000$ 356,420$ 145,580$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,400$ 401,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6504 450 mm WWM on 8th Line from north of new road to new road MIL WWM 450 mm 738 390,410$ 198,174$ 588,584$ 206,467$ 12,949$ 808,000$ -$ -$ 808,000$ 573,680$ 234,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 161,600$ 646,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6505 300 mm WWM on 8th Line from north of Britannia Rd to Britannia Rd MIL WWM 300 mm 452 196,471$ 92,864$ 289,335$ 101,299$ 6,365$ 397,000$ -$ -$ 397,000$ 281,870$ 115,130$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 79,400$ 317,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6506 675 mm WWM on 9th Line from Argyll Rd to 10th Side Rd - Georgetown South Connection HHGEO WWM 675 mm 1082 2,826,306$ 56,526$ 2,882,832$ 1,008,745$ 63,422$ 3,955,000$ -$ -$ 3,955,000$ 2,808,050$ 1,146,950$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 791,000$ 3,164,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6507 1200 mm WWM on Britannia Rd to 5th Line to James Snow Pkwy MIL WWM 1200 mm 625 2,242,600$ 44,852$ 2,287,452$ 800,224$ 50,324$ 3,138,000$ -$ -$ 3,138,000$ 2,227,980$ 910,020$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 627,600$ 2,510,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6508 Decommissioning of HH WWPS #3, connection to new 8th Line trunk sewer MIL WWPS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 355,000$ 145,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6550 525 mm WWM on Louis St Laurent Extension from Tremaine Rd to Tremaine Rd WWPS MIL WWM 525 mm 440 1,021,502$ 20,430$ 1,041,932$ 365,146$ 22,922$ 1,430,000$ -$ -$ 1,430,000$ 1,015,300$ 414,700$ 286,000$ 1,144,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6551 525 mm WWM on new North Oakville road from Burnhamthorpe Rd to Project #5062 OAK WWM 525 mm 1900 1,085,505$ 21,710$ 1,107,215$ 387,426$ 24,359$ 1,519,000$ -$ -$ 1,519,000$ 1,078,490$ 440,510$ -$ -$ 303,800$ 1,215,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6552375 mm WWM on new road alignment in Milton Education Village from from 950 m south of Louis St Laurent extension to Louis St Laurent extension

MIL WWM 375 mm 950 2,084,962$ 41,699$ 2,126,662$ 744,552$ 46,787$ 2,918,000$ -$ -$ 2,918,000$ 2,071,780$ 846,220$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 583,600$ 2,334,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6553450 mm WWM on new road in Milton Education Village from 800m north of Louis St Laurent extension to Louis St Laurent extension and on Louis St Laurent extension from 340m west of Tremaine Rd to Tremaine Rd

MIL WWM 450 mm 1140 603,354$ 12,067$ 615,421$ 215,040$ 13,539$ 844,000$ -$ -$ 844,000$ 599,240$ 244,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 168,800$ 675,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6554 600 mm WWM on Lower Base Line from WWFM discharge approx 650 m west of 1st Line to Regional Rd 25 MIL WWM 600 mm 1911 4,650,802$ 536,969$ 5,187,771$ 1,816,098$ 114,131$ 7,118,000$ -$ -$ 7,118,000$ 5,053,780$ 2,064,220$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,423,600$ 5,694,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6555 17 ML/d WWPS on Tremaine Rd (200 L/s) MIL WWPS 200 L/s 2,083,712$ 2,636,674$ 4,720,386$ 1,651,765$ 103,848$ 6,476,000$ -$ -$ 6,476,000$ 4,597,960$ 1,878,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,295,200$ 5,180,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6556 Twinned 300 mm WWFM from Tremaine WWPS to Lower Base Line, approx 650 m west of 1st Line MIL WWFM 300 mm 1135 1,063,282$ 808,163$ 1,871,445$ 655,384$ 41,172$ 2,568,000$ -$ -$ 2,568,000$ 1,823,280$ 744,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 513,600$ 2,054,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6557600 mm WWM on Tremaine Rd from approximately 880 m north of South Tremaine Rd WWPS to South Tremaine Rd WWPS

MIL WWM 600 mm 882 2,147,425$ 264,925$ 2,412,350$ 844,579$ 53,072$ 3,310,000$ -$ -$ 3,310,000$ 2,350,100$ 959,900$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 662,000$ 2,648,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6558525 mm WWM on Tremaine Rd from approx 1500m north of South Tremaine WWPS to approx 880 m north of South Tremaine WWPS

MIL WWM 525 mm 657 1,525,345$ 442,849$ 1,968,195$ 688,505$ 43,300$ 2,700,000$ -$ -$ 2,700,000$ 1,917,000$ 783,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 540,000$ 2,160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6559 450 mm WWM on Tremaine Rd from Britannia Rd to 1700 m south of Britannia Rd MIL WWM 450 mm 1050 2,366,371$ 661,244$ 3,027,615$ 1,059,778$ 66,608$ 4,154,000$ -$ -$ 4,154,000$ 2,949,340$ 1,204,660$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 830,800$ 3,323,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Distribution - Greenfield

Annualized Funding Requirements

Capacity

Total Estimated Cost (2012$)

Benefit to Existing (2012$)

Oversizing (2012$)

DC (2012$) Res (2012$)Non-Res (2012$)

Length (m)Base Cost

(2012$)

Additional Costs

(2012$)

Subtotal(2012$)

Contingency/ Engineering

(2012$)

Non-Rebatable

HST(2012$)

Size/CapacityRegion IPFS ID

Project Description Municipality Project Type

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

Table 20 ‐ Wastewater Capital Program

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

Annualized Funding RequirementsTotal Estimated

Cost (2012$)

Benefit to Existing (2012$)

Oversizing (2012$)

DC (2012$) Res (2012$)Non-Res (2012$)

Length (m)Base Cost

(2012$)

Additional Costs

(2012$)

Subtotal(2012$)

Contingency/ Engineering

(2012$)

Non-Rebatable

HST(2012$)

Size/CapacityRegion IPFS ID

Project Description Municipality Project Type

6560 525 mm WWM on James Snow Pkwy and new road alignment from Steeles Ave to Esquesing Line MIL WWM 525 mm 1708 975,795$ 431,858$ 1,407,654$ 492,378$ 30,968$ 1,931,000$ -$ -$ 1,931,000$ 1,371,010$ 559,990$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 386,200$ 1,544,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6561 375 mm WWM on new road and Britannia Rd from Milton Education Village to Tremaine Rd MIL WWM 375 mm 710 348,399$ 6,968$ 355,367$ 124,815$ 7,818$ 488,000$ -$ -$ 488,000$ 346,480$ 141,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 97,600$ 390,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6562450 mm WWM on new road from 440 m north of Derry Rd to Derry Rd and 525 mm WWM on Derry Rd from 725 m east of 5th Line to 5th Line

MIL WWM 525 mm 725 797,918$ 15,958$ 813,876$ 285,219$ 17,905$ 1,117,000$ -$ -$ 1,117,000$ 793,070$ 323,930$ 223,400$ 893,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6563 Decommissioning of temporary FM (IPFS #6112) MIL WWFM -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ 1,000,000$ 710,000$ 290,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 800,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6564 525 mm WWM on new alignment from Esquesing Line to 3rd Line MIL WWM 525 mm 2104 1,202,289$ 950,172$ 2,152,461$ 753,185$ 47,354$ 2,953,000$ -$ -$ 2,953,000$ 2,096,630$ 856,370$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 590,600$ 2,362,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6567 Twinned 300 mm WWFM on 10th Side Rd from 9th Ln to 8th Ln HHGEO WWFM 300 mm 646 605,201$ 12,104$ 617,305$ 216,114$ 13,581$ 847,000$ -$ -$ 847,000$ 601,370$ 245,630$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 169,400$ 677,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6570 24 MLD WWPS at 10 Side Rd/9th Line (275 L/s) HHGEO WWPS 275 L/s 2,865,104$ 2,087,302$ 4,952,406$ 1,733,641$ 108,953$ 6,795,000$ -$ -$ 6,795,000$ 4,824,450$ 1,970,550$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,359,000$ 5,436,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6571 104 ML/d WWPS on Trafalgar Rd/ Britannia Rd (1200 L/s) MIL WWPS 1200 L/s 12,502,272$ 1,005,045$ 13,507,317$ 4,727,522$ 297,161$ 18,532,000$ -$ -$ 18,532,000$ 13,157,720$ 5,374,280$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,706,400$ 14,825,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6573 1050 mm WWM 401 Crossing from Steeles Ave to Auburn Rd MIL WWM 1050 mm 1250 4,181,243$ 2,013,550$ 6,194,792$ 2,167,922$ 136,285$ 8,499,000$ -$ -$ 8,499,000$ 6,034,290$ 2,464,710$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,699,800$ 6,799,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6574 1050 mm WWM on Auburn Rd from Hwy 401 crossing easement to Trafalgar Rd MIL WWM 1050 mm 870 1,280,734$ 849,628$ 2,130,363$ 745,769$ 46,868$ 2,923,000$ -$ -$ 2,923,000$ 2,075,330$ 847,670$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 584,600$ 2,338,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6575 1050 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd from Auburn Rd to Derry Rd MIL WWM 1050 mm 1850 2,723,401$ 2,103,662$ 4,827,063$ 1,689,742$ 106,195$ 6,623,000$ -$ -$ 6,623,000$ 4,702,330$ 1,920,670$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,324,600$ 5,298,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6576 1050 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd from Derry Rd to Golf Course MIL WWM 1050 mm 1805 2,657,350$ 454,314$ 3,111,664$ 1,088,880$ 68,457$ 4,269,000$ -$ -$ 4,269,000$ 3,030,990$ 1,238,010$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 853,800$ 3,415,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6577 1050 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd from Golf Course to Britannia Rd / Trafalgar Rd WWPS MIL WWM 1050 mm 1256 4,201,829$ 1,309,217$ 5,511,046$ 1,928,711$ 121,243$ 7,561,000$ -$ -$ 7,561,000$ 5,368,310$ 2,192,690$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,512,200$ 6,048,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6578 525 WWM on Trafalgar Rd from south of Britannia Rd to Britannia Rd/ Trafalgar Rd WWPS MIL WWM 525 mm 1176 2,731,268$ 260,797$ 2,992,065$ 1,047,110$ 65,825$ 4,105,000$ -$ -$ 4,105,000$ 2,914,550$ 1,190,450$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 821,000$ 3,284,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6579 Twinned 750 mm WWFM on Britannia Rd from Trafalgar Rd to 6th Line MIL WWFM 750 mm 1344 4,059,038$ 4,168,015$ 8,227,053$ 2,879,952$ 180,995$ 11,288,000$ -$ -$ 11,288,000$ 8,014,480$ 3,273,520$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,257,600$ 9,030,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6580 1200 mm WWM on Britannia Rd from 6th Line to 5th Line MIL WWM 1200 mm 1400 5,023,424$ 512,854$ 5,536,278$ 1,937,924$ 121,798$ 7,596,000$ -$ -$ 7,596,000$ 5,393,160$ 2,202,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,519,200$ 6,076,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6581 1350 mm WWM on 5th Line from Britannia Rd to Lower Base Line MIL WWM 1350 mm 2461 9,607,474$ 1,080,141$ 10,687,615$ 3,740,257$ 235,128$ 14,663,000$ -$ -$ 14,663,000$ 10,410,730$ 4,252,270$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,932,600$ 11,730,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6582 1350 mm WWM on Lower Base Line from 5th Line to 4th Line MIL WWM 1350 mm 1378 5,379,608$ 1,439,580$ 6,819,188$ 2,386,790$ 150,022$ 9,356,000$ -$ -$ 9,356,000$ 6,642,760$ 2,713,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,871,200$ 7,484,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6583 525 mm WWM on new road from 1400 m north of Britannia Rd to Britannia Rd MIL WWM 525 mm 1366 3,170,849$ 732,651$ 3,903,500$ 1,366,623$ 85,877$ 5,356,000$ -$ -$ 5,356,000$ 3,802,760$ 1,553,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,071,200$ 4,284,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6584 156 ML/d WWPS at Lower Base Line and 4th Line (1805 L/s) MIL WWPS 1805 L/s 18,805,501$ 1,896,110$ 20,701,611$ 7,245,954$ 455,435$ 28,403,000$ -$ -$ 28,403,000$ 20,166,130$ 8,236,870$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,680,600$ 22,722,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6585 Twinned 900 mm WWFM from Lower Base Line to RR 25 MIL WWFM 900 mm 3532 12,414,055$ 3,862,331$ 16,276,386$ 5,696,534$ 358,080$ 22,331,000$ -$ -$ 22,331,000$ 15,855,010$ 6,475,990$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 446,620$ 4,019,580$ 17,864,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6586 750 mm WWM on 8th Line from Argyll Rd to 10th Side Rd HHGEO WWM 750 mm 1059 1,003,830$ 294,986$ 1,298,816$ 454,610$ 28,574$ 1,782,000$ -$ -$ 1,782,000$ 1,265,220$ 516,780$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 356,400$ 1,425,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6587 600 mm WWM on 8th Line from Miller Rd to Argyll Rd HHGEO WWM 600 mm 1225 797,112$ 237,919$ 1,035,031$ 362,199$ 22,771$ 1,420,000$ -$ -$ 1,420,000$ 1,008,200$ 411,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 284,000$ 1,136,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6589 3 ML/d WWPS on 10th Side Rd in Norval (35 L/s ) HHGEO WWPS 35 L/s 364,650$ 133,793$ 498,443$ 174,592$ 10,966$ 684,000$ -$ -$ 684,000$ 485,640$ 198,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 136,800$ 547,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total Distribution - Greenfield 336,349,000$ -$ -$ 336,349,000$ 238,807,790$ 97,541,210$ 19,644,800$ 11,739,200$ 32,585,200$ 49,084,800$ 200,000$ 14,738,400$ 60,684,400$ 19,723,200$ -$ 2,212,620$ 16,900,980$ 47,410,600$ 32,027,400$ 28,031,800$ 1,365,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6482 300 mm WWM on Plains Rd West from Grand View heading due north west BURL WWM 300 105 91,295$ 1,826$ 93,121$ 32,592$ 2,049$ 128,000$ -$ -$ 128,000$ 84,480$ 43,520$ -$ -$ -$ 25,600$ 102,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6483 325 mm WWM on Plains Rd West from Grand View heading due north west BURL WWM 325 59 58,911$ 1,178$ 60,089$ 21,031$ 1,322$ 82,000$ -$ -$ 82,000$ 54,120$ 27,880$ -$ -$ -$ 16,400$ 65,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6484 375 mm WWM on Plains Rd West from Grand View heading due north west BURL WWM 375 66 64,701$ 1,294$ 65,995$ 23,098$ 1,452$ 91,000$ -$ -$ 91,000$ 60,060$ 30,940$ -$ -$ -$ 18,200$ 72,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6485 375 mm WWM on Plains Rd West between Howard Rd and entrance to Spring Gardens BURL WWM 375 428 420,042$ 8,401$ 428,442$ 149,955$ 9,426$ 588,000$ -$ -$ 588,000$ 388,080$ 199,920$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 117,600$ 470,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6486 200 mm WWM on Plains Rd West between Howard Rd and entrance to Spring Gardens BURL WWM 200 60 43,534$ 871$ 44,405$ 15,542$ 977$ 61,000$ -$ -$ 61,000$ 40,260$ 20,740$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,200$ 48,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6487 525 mm WWM on Plains Rd West between Howard Rd and entrance to Spring Gardens BURL WWM 525 1430 1,633,970$ 32,679$ 1,666,650$ 583,327$ 36,666$ 2,287,000$ -$ -$ 2,287,000$ 1,509,420$ 777,580$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 457,400$ 1,829,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6488 250 mm WWM on Guelph Line between Woodward and 120m south of Prospect Street BURL WWM 250 304 236,754$ 4,735$ 241,489$ 84,521$ 5,313$ 331,000$ -$ -$ 331,000$ 218,460$ 112,540$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 66,200$ 264,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6489 450 mm WWM on Appleby Line between Fairview Street and 151 m south of Harvester Rd BURL WWM 450 583 617,115$ 435,892$ 1,053,007$ 368,553$ 23,166$ 1,445,000$ -$ -$ 1,445,000$ 953,700$ 491,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 289,000$ 1,156,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6490 300 mm WWM on Pearl Street between Old Lakeshore Rd and Pine Street BURL WWM 300 112 97,154$ 44,978$ 142,132$ 49,746$ 3,127$ 195,000$ -$ -$ 195,000$ 128,700$ 66,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 39,000$ 156,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6491 525 mm WWM on Lakshore Rd between Old Lakeshore Rd entrance and Torrance Street BURL WWM 525 83 94,925$ 1,898$ 96,823$ 33,888$ 2,130$ 133,000$ -$ -$ 133,000$ 87,780$ 45,220$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 26,600$ 106,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6492 825 mm WWM on Maple Avenue East Between Lakeshore Rd and Fairview Street BURL WWM 825 1996 4,099,668$ 372,708$ 4,472,376$ 1,565,331$ 98,392$ 6,136,000$ -$ -$ 6,136,000$ 4,049,760$ 2,086,240$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,227,200$ 4,908,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6493 300 mm WWM on Atwood Ave/Murno Circle and existing sewer alignment from Berton Blvd to Maple Ave HHGEO WWM 300 1693 1,472,031$ 29,441$ 1,501,471$ 525,515$ 33,032$ 2,060,000$ -$ -$ 2,060,000$ 1,359,600$ 700,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 412,000$ 1,648,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6494 300 mm WWM on Arborglen Drive and across North Halton Golf Course towards Maple Ave HHGEO WWM 300 230 199,981$ 4,000$ 203,980$ 71,393$ 4,488$ 280,000$ -$ -$ 280,000$ 184,800$ 95,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 56,000$ 224,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6495 300 mm WWM on Delrex Blvd between Irwin Crescent and the southern entrance to Fauldon Drive HHGEO WWM 300 115 99,990$ 2,000$ 101,990$ 35,697$ 2,244$ 140,000$ -$ -$ 140,000$ 92,400$ 47,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,000$ 112,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6509 450 mm WWM on Mill Street between Wilbur Street North and Wallace Street HHACT WWM 450 177 187,357$ 3,747$ 191,104$ 66,887$ 4,204$ 262,000$ -$ -$ 262,000$ 172,920$ 89,080$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 52,400$ 209,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6510 300 mm WWM on Main Street South between Cobblehill Rd and Brock Street HHACT WWM 300 122 106,077$ 2,122$ 108,198$ 37,869$ 2,380$ 148,000$ -$ -$ 148,000$ 97,680$ 50,320$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 29,600$ 118,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6511 600 mm WWM from Elgin Street South along Black Creek alignment to Tanners Drive HHACT WWM 600 255 332,151$ 6,643$ 338,794$ 118,578$ 7,453$ 465,000$ -$ -$ 465,000$ 306,900$ 158,100$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 93,000$ 372,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6512 525 mm WWM from Elgin Street South along Black Creek alignment to Tanners Drive HHACT WWM 525 997 1,139,209$ 22,784$ 1,161,993$ 406,697$ 25,564$ 1,594,000$ -$ -$ 1,594,000$ 1,052,040$ 541,960$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 318,800$ 1,275,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6513 250 mm WWM on Storey Drive between Kingham and Cobblehill Rd HHACT WWM 250 180 140,392$ 2,808$ 143,200$ 50,120$ 3,150$ 196,000$ -$ -$ 196,000$ 129,360$ 66,640$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 39,200$ 156,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6514 450 mm WWM on Maple Ave between Main Street East and Turner Drive MIL WWM 450 158 167,246$ 3,345$ 170,590$ 59,707$ 3,753$ 234,000$ -$ -$ 234,000$ 154,440$ 79,560$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 46,800$ 187,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6515 300 mm WWM on Childs Drive between Ontario Street South and the south entrance of Satok Crescent MIL WWM 300 241 209,875$ 93,132$ 303,007$ 106,053$ 6,666$ 416,000$ -$ -$ 416,000$ 274,560$ 141,440$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 83,200$ 332,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6516 375 mm WWM on Nipissing Rd between Milton Mall entrance and Childs Drive MIL WWM 375 151 147,861$ 2,957$ 150,818$ 52,786$ 3,318$ 207,000$ -$ -$ 207,000$ 136,620$ 70,380$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41,400$ 165,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6517 450 mm WWM on Oak Street between Charles Street and Ontario Street South MIL WWM 450 704 745,232$ 14,905$ 760,137$ 266,048$ 16,723$ 1,043,000$ -$ -$ 1,043,000$ 688,380$ 354,620$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 208,600$ 834,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6518 250 mm WWM on Donald Campbell Avenue between Ontario Street South and Cemetary Rd MIL WWM 250 82 64,254$ 1,285$ 65,539$ 22,939$ 1,442$ 90,000$ -$ -$ 90,000$ 59,400$ 30,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 18,000$ 72,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6519 375 mm WWM between 50 m south of Wakefield Rd and the southern tip of Fulton Street MIL WWM 375 258 253,203$ 5,064$ 258,267$ 90,393$ 5,682$ 354,000$ -$ -$ 354,000$ 233,640$ 120,360$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 70,800$ 283,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6520 525 mm WWM between 50 m south of Wakefield Rd and the southern tip of Fulton Street MIL WWM 525 84 96,235$ 1,925$ 98,160$ 34,356$ 2,160$ 135,000$ -$ -$ 135,000$ 89,100$ 45,900$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 27,000$ 108,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6521 750 mm WWM linking Oak Street east to Oak Street West MIL WWM 750 9 16,693$ 334$ 17,027$ 5,960$ 375$ 23,000$ -$ -$ 23,000$ 15,180$ 7,820$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,600$ 18,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6522 250 mm on Bronte Street West between Main Street West and Robert Street MIL WWM 250 274 213,708$ 4,274$ 217,983$ 76,294$ 4,796$ 299,000$ -$ -$ 299,000$ 197,340$ 101,660$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 59,800$ 239,200$ -$

6523 450 mm WWM on Bronte Street South between Anne Blvd and 67 m north of Laurier Ave entrance MIL WWM 450 264 279,448$ 195,955$ 475,403$ 166,391$ 10,459$ 652,000$ -$ -$ 652,000$ 430,320$ 221,680$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 130,400$ 521,600$ -$

6524600 mm WWM on Williams Ave/Commercial Street from southern corner of Williams Ave and south down Commercial Street to Laurier Ave

MIL WWM 600 499 649,046$ 12,981$ 662,027$ 231,709$ 14,565$ 908,000$ -$ -$ 908,000$ 599,280$ 308,720$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 181,600$ 726,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6525750 mm WWM on Anne Blvd between Bronte Street South and down along the length of Meadowbrook Drive and across Bronte Meadows Park to join Williams Ave at southern corner

MIL WWM 750 912 1,728,283$ 34,566$ 1,762,849$ 616,997$ 38,783$ 2,419,000$ -$ -$ 2,419,000$ 1,596,540$ 822,460$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 483,800$ 1,935,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6526 450 mm WWM on service Rd for West River WWPS from West River Street to WWPS OAK WWM 450 95 100,609$ 2,012$ 102,621$ 35,917$ 2,258$ 141,000$ -$ -$ 141,000$ 93,060$ 47,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 28,200$ 112,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6527 450 mm WWM on service road to Marine Drive WWPS from Marine Drive OAK WWM 450 18 19,095$ 382$ 19,476$ 6,817$ 428$ 27,000$ -$ -$ 27,000$ 17,820$ 9,180$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,400$ 21,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6528 31.9 L/s upgrade of West River WWPS OAK WWPS 32 333,394$ 6,668$ 340,062$ 119,022$ 7,481$ 467,000$ 119,000$ -$ 348,000$ 229,680$ 118,320$ -$ 93,400$ 373,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6529 375 mm WWM on Oak Park from Dundas Street East to Central Park then along Central Park to Georgian Drive OAK WWM 375 610 598,657$ 11,973$ 610,631$ 213,721$ 13,434$ 838,000$ -$ -$ 838,000$ 553,080$ 284,920$ -$ -$ -$ 167,600$ 670,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6530 300 mm WWM on Kerr Street between Forster Park and Rebecca Street OAK WWM 300 710 617,331$ 12,347$ 629,678$ 220,387$ 13,853$ 864,000$ -$ -$ 864,000$ 570,240$ 293,760$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 172,800$ 691,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6531250 mm WWM on Chisholm/Rebecca Street between Forsyth Street and Chisholm Street on Rebecca Street and on Chisholm Street between Rebecca Street and 45 m north of Lakeshore Rd West

OAK WWM 250 200 155,992$ 3,120$ 159,111$ 55,689$ 3,500$ 218,000$ -$ -$ 218,000$ 143,880$ 74,120$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 43,600$ 174,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6532 525 mm WWM on Stewart Street between Felan Drive and Kerr Street OAK WWM 525 225 257,093$ 5,142$ 262,235$ 91,782$ 5,769$ 360,000$ -$ -$ 360,000$ 237,600$ 122,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 72,000$ 288,000$ -$ -$ -$

6534 375 mm WWM on Lyons Lane between Cross Ave and due north up Lyons Lane 150 m OAK WWM 375 150 147,211$ 2,944$ 150,155$ 52,554$ 3,303$ 206,000$ -$ -$ 206,000$ 135,960$ 70,040$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 41,200$ 164,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6535450 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd between 10 m north of Inglehart Street North and over Cornwall Rd and railway to connect to Cross Ave

OAK WWM 450 412 436,109$ 432,272$ 868,381$ 303,933$ 19,104$ 1,191,000$ -$ -$ 1,191,000$ 786,060$ 404,940$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 238,200$ 952,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6536 525 mm WWM on Cross Avenue between Argus Rd and Lyons Lane OAK WWM 525 395 451,341$ 935,153$ 1,386,494$ 485,273$ 30,503$ 1,902,000$ -$ -$ 1,902,000$ 1,255,320$ 646,680$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 380,400$ 1,521,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Distribution - Built Boundary

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

Table 20 ‐ Wastewater Capital Program

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

Annualized Funding RequirementsTotal Estimated

Cost (2012$)

Benefit to Existing (2012$)

Oversizing (2012$)

DC (2012$) Res (2012$)Non-Res (2012$)

Length (m)Base Cost

(2012$)

Additional Costs

(2012$)

Subtotal(2012$)

Contingency/ Engineering

(2012$)

Non-Rebatable

HST(2012$)

Size/CapacityRegion IPFS ID

Project Description Municipality Project Type

6537675 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd between Spruce Steet until 60 m north of Cornwall Rd where it follows the side road crossing the railway line and through the Go Transit Stn car Park and heads due west and north up Argus Rd for 60 m

OAK WWM 675 737 1,236,492$ 1,151,553$ 2,388,044$ 835,816$ 52,537$ 3,276,000$ -$ -$ 3,276,000$ 2,162,160$ 1,113,840$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 655,200$ 2,620,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6538 Upgraded gravity sewer within UGC on North Service Rd from Truman Ave to east of Pearson Dr OAK WWM 450 650 344,018$ -$ 344,018$ 120,406$ 7,568$ 472,000$ -$ -$ 472,000$ 311,520$ 160,480$ -$ -$ 94,400$ 377,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6540 Twin 900 mm WWM on Trafalgar Rd and Randall Street/Rebecca Street from Lawson Street to Wilson Street OAK WWM 900 1200 6,248,911$ -$ 6,248,911$ 2,187,119$ 137,476$ 8,574,000$ -$ -$ 8,574,000$ 5,658,840$ 2,915,160$ 1,714,800$ 6,859,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6541 Deep Trunk Sewer on Rebecca St and Lakeshore Rd W from Wilson St to Oakville SW WWTP OAK WWM 1050 3,600 33,164,424$ -$ 33,164,424$ 11,607,548$ 729,617$ 45,502,000$ 15,926,000$ -$ 29,576,000$ 19,520,160$ 10,055,840$ 9,100,400$ 36,401,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6542 Decommissioning of 5 WWPSs OAK WWPS 364,431$ -$ 364,431$ 127,551$ 8,017$ 500,000$ -$ -$ 500,000$ 330,000$ 170,000$ -$ 100,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6543 Gravity Sewers from Decommissioned WWPS's to New Deep Trunk OAK WWM 955,368$ -$ 955,368$ 334,379$ 21,018$ 1,311,000$ -$ -$ 1,311,000$ 865,260$ 445,740$ -$ 262,200$ 1,048,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6544 6 L/s upgrade of Bronte Yacht Club WWPS OAK WWPS 6 L/s 62,511$ 1,250$ 63,762$ 22,317$ 1,403$ 87,000$ 19,000$ -$ 68,000$ 44,880$ 23,120$ -$ 17,400$ 69,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6545 41 L/s upgrade of Junction Street WWPS BURL WWPS 41 L/s 427,161$ 8,543$ 435,704$ 152,496$ 9,585$ 598,000$ 135,000$ -$ 463,000$ 305,580$ 157,420$ -$ 119,600$ 478,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

6546Construction of approx 100 m of new local sewer to eliminate Shepherd Rd WWPS sewer sized adequately to accommodate 2031 flows of approximately 21.2 L/s

OAK WWPS 400,000$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 264,000$ 136,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 320,000$ -$ -$

6547 23 L/s upgrade of Grandview Avenue WWPS BURL WWPS 23 L/s 239,627$ 4,793$ 244,419$ 85,547$ 5,377$ 335,000$ 139,000$ -$ 196,000$ 129,360$ 66,640$ -$ 67,000$ 268,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Total Distribution - Built Boundary 90,671,000$ 16,338,000$ -$ 74,333,000$ 49,059,780$ 25,273,220$ 10,815,200$ 43,920,400$ 2,732,800$ 605,400$ 1,219,000$ 2,264,000$ 4,381,400$ 1,495,200$ 3,324,400$ 5,629,400$ 1,567,000$ 3,066,000$ 2,829,800$ 1,036,400$ 2,377,600$ 1,768,000$ 368,000$ 510,200$ 760,800$ -$

885,529,000$ 28,598,000$ 26,100,000$ 830,831,000$ 577,770,380$ 253,060,620$ 328,592,000$ 98,141,600$ 36,010,000$ 53,262,200$ 3,577,080$ 36,792,120$ 76,169,800$ 96,153,600$ 4,496,400$ 8,134,020$ 18,709,980$ 50,718,600$ 35,099,200$ 30,190,200$ 3,985,200$ 2,010,000$ 610,000$ 752,200$ 1,882,800$ 242,000$ TOTAL

5063 4994

5908

6215

5900

5906

5067

5912

5911

6114

5066

5910

3706

6381

(C)/3

794 (

EA/D

)

611650

62

6551

6562

6382

(C)/3

867 (

EA/D

)

6378 (C)6380

(C)

5905

5894

46483863

58913799

5892

5904

4997

5903

5497

6481

5907

6585

6567

6579

6496

6556

/6379

6115/5068

6112

3865

58933797 5923

5899

5728

5898

#*

#*

#*

#*#*6570

6571

6589

6584

6555

$+

#*

#*

#*

#*#*

#*

#*

$+

$+

$+

$+

$+

6541

6492

6540

6530

6538

6537

6494

6485/6486/6487 6489

6532

6540

6493

6493

6525

6512/6511

6517

6543

6536

6535

6524

6529

6488

6522

6523

6515

6509

6519/6520

6514

6534

6495

6516

6513

6531

6490

6510

65266491

6518

6482/6483/6484

6527

6521

6543

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

#

#

#

##

#

##

4996

49953800(D)

6143QEW

Hwy 401

Hwy 7

Hwy 403

Hw

y 6

Guelph St

Guelph St W

QE

W

Hwy 403

Hwy 7

QE

W

Hwy 401

Hw

y 403

Hw

y 403

Six

th L

ine

No 15 Siderd

Wa

lke

r'S

Lin

e

Fift

h L

ine

Fo

urt

h L

ine

Se

con

d L

ine

No 32 Siderd

New St

No 5 Siderd

Tw

iss

Rd

No 25 Siderd

Du

blin

Lin

e

Rebecca St

Fairview St

North Service Rd

Mainway

Ten

th L

ine

Fir

st L

ine

Lakeshore Rd

Speers Rd

Kin

g R

d

Lakeshore Rd W

Main St E

Milb

uro

ug

h L

ine

Campbellville Rd

Ce

da

r S

pri

ng

s R

d

Ap

ple

by

Lin

e

Harvester Rd

No 10 Siderd

No 20 Siderd

Guelph St

Win

sto

n C

hu

rch

ill B

lvd

Cornwall Rd

Th

om

ps

on

Rd

S

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Ke

rr St

Upper Middle Rd

Britannia Rd

No 17 Siderd

No 1 Siderd

Lakeshore Rd E

Na

ssa

ga

we

ya-E

squ

es

ing

Tlin

e

Steeles Ave W

No 30 Siderd

Bra

nt

St

Th

ird

Lin

e

Mc

Niv

en

Rd

Colling Rd

North Service Rd W

Kilbride St

Plains Rd W

Be

ll S

cho

ol

Lin

e

Wa

terd

ow

n R

d

Kelso Rd

Fo

rd D

r

Ma

in S

t S

Nin

th L

ine

Gu

elp

h L

ine

No 3 Siderd

Pe

ru R

d

Lower Base Line E

Bro

nte

Rd

Mai

n S

t

Ma

ple Ave

Lower Base Line

No 14 Siderd

River Dr

Esq

ue

sin

g L

ine

Bu

rlo

ak

Dr

Plains Rd E

Blin

d L

ine

Na

ssa

ga

we

ya-P

us

chlin

ch T

line

Mo

un

tain

vie

w R

d S

No 2 Siderd

Royal Windsor Dr

Bo

sto

n C

hu

rch

Rd

North

Ser

vice R

d E

No 4 Siderd

Bro

nte

St

S

Ch

art

we

ll R

d

Ma

in S

t N

Mill St W

Main St W

Wyecroft Rd

Clayhill Rd

Lower Base Line W

Ma

rtin

St

Mo

rris

on

Rd

Tra

falg

ar R

d

Fallbrook Trail

North Shore Blvd E

Co

nfe

de

rati

on

St

Nottinghill G

ate

Ma

ple

Gro

ve

Dr

No 8 Siderd

Auburn Rd

Reid Siderd

Kingsway Dr

No 22 Siderd

South Service Rd E

Re

yno

lds S

t

Ho

rnb

y R

d

Bro

nte

St

N

No 28 Siderd

Wildwood Rd

Industrial St

No 27 Siderd

Mo

un

tain

vie

w R

d N

Queen St

On

tari

o S

t N

Cre

ws

on

s L

ine

Burnhamthorpe Rd W

Campbell Ave E

Britannia Rd W

Leighland Ave

South Service Rd W

Eas

tpor

t Dr

He

nd

ers

on

Rd

Tre

ma

ine

Rd

Th

om

ps

on

Rd

NC

hu

rch

ill R

d S

Cross Ave

Sh

erw

oo

d H

eig

hts

Dr

Ch

urc

hill

Rd

N

South Service Rd

Mississa

ga St

Panin Rd

Queensway Dr

Glen Lawson Rd

Prince St

Fra

ser

Dr

No 12 Siderd

Se

ne

ca

Ave

Great Lakes B

lvd

Iroquois Shore Rd

Josh

ua

s C

ree

k D

r

Sysc

on

Rd

James St

Ha

ll R

d

South Sheridan Way

Old

Pin

ecr

est

Rd

La

salle

Pa

rk R

d

Upper Middle Rd W

Mountain Brow Rd

Th

ird

Lin

eT

hir

d L

ine

Fift

h L

ine

Campbellville Rd

Ap

ple

by

Lin

e

Map

le A

ve

Lower Base Line W

Britannia Rd

Steeles Ave W

Third Line

Th

ird

Lin

e

Fift

h L

ine

No 3 Siderd

Wyecroft Rd

South Service Rd W

Be

ll S

cho

ol

Lin

e

Nin

th L

ine

Wa

lke

r'S

Lin

e

No 17 Siderd

No 10 Siderd

Na

ssa

ga

we

ya-P

us

chlin

ch T

line

Ten

th L

ine

No 20 Siderd

Plains Rd E

Britannia Rd

South Service Rd E

Fift

h L

ine

Six

th L

ine

Eig

hth

Lin

e

South Service Rd

No 17 Siderd

South Service Rd

No 3 Siderd

No 2 Siderd

No 27 Siderd

Ten

th L

ine

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Du

blin

Lin

e

Milb

uro

ug

h L

ine

South Service Rd W

No 22 Siderd

First L

ine

Milb

uro

ug

h L

ine

No 22 Siderd

Eig

hth

Lin

e

Six

th L

ine

Bu

rlo

ak

Dr

Fo

urt

h L

ine

Six

th L

ine

Fo

urt

h L

ine

No 1 Siderd

Na

ssa

ga

we

ya-P

us

chlin

ch T

line

Eig

hth

Lin

e

No 17 Siderd

Ma

in S

t N

Fo

urt

h L

ine

Fo

urt

h L

ine

Milb

uro

ug

h L

ine

Eig

hth

Lin

e

No 30 Siderd

No 1 Siderd

No 2 Siderd

Ten

th L

ine

Fir

st L

ine

Th

ird

Lin

e

Tra

falg

ar

Rd

Gu

elp

h L

ine

Tre

ma

ine

Rd

Ap

ple

by

Lin

e

Derry Rd

Re

g R

d 2

5

Dundas St

Steeles Ave

Derry Rd W

Dundas St W

Nin

th L

ine

Britannia Rd W

Bro

nte

Rd

Dundas St E

Bra

nt

St

Do

rva

l Dr

Derry Rd E

No 10 Siderd

Upper Middle Rd E

Ford Dr

Win

sto

n C

hu

rch

ill B

lvd

No 20 Siderd

Upper Middle Rd W

Ne

yag

aw

a B

lvd

Britannia Rd E

Steeles Ave E

Maple Ave

Bu

rlo

ak

Dr

Burnhamthorpe Rd E

Burnhamthorpe Rd W

No 32 Siderd

Ma

rtin

St

Ma

in S

t S

Upper Middle Rd

Steeles Ave W

Ma

in S

t N

Fo

urth

Lin

e

Jam

es

Sn

ow

Pky

Re

g R

d 2

5

Nin

th L

ine

Tra

falg

ar

Rd

Gu

elp

h L

ine

James Snow Pky

Re

g R

d 2

5

Win

sto

n C

hu

rch

ill B

lvd

Win

sto

n C

hu

rch

ill B

lvd

Hwy 407 Hwy 407

6384 (C)/3808 (EA/D)6383 (D)/5945(C)

5508

5922, 5315

5726/802

5069(D), 6427(C)

3864

3798

5898

5902/6508

6588

6568

6569

6581

6554

6575

6583

6576

6564

6560

6580

6498

6502

6497

6573

6500

6587

6578

6506

6552

6586

6559

6557

657765

53

6504

6501

6558

6503

6507

6550

Acton WWTP

Skyway WWTP

Milton WWTP

Georgetown WWTP

Oakville SW WWTP

Oakville SE WWTP

ELIZABETH GARDEN PS

5924

6582

6499

6574

6505

6561

6572

Halton Preferred Wastewater Servicing Strategy

Lake OntarioHamilton Harbour

August 20111:40,000

60114062-348-WW2012 Development Charges Update

LegendExisting Infrastructure# Wastewater Pumping Station

$ Wastewater Treatment Plant

Wastewater Main

Wastewater Forcemain

Previously Approved Infrastructure#* Wastewater Pumping Station

$+ Wastewater Treatment Plant

Wastewater Main

Proposed/Upgrade Infrastructure#* Wastewater Pumping Station

$+ Wastewater Treatment Plant

Proposed Alignment - Wastewater Main

Wastewater Forcemain

Distribution-Built Boundary Wastewater main

Funded Infrastructure#* Wastewater Pumping Station

$+ Wastewater Treatment Plant

Wastewater Main

Wastewater Forcemain

WWTP Drainage Area

³

Figure 13

/6563

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011

APPENDIX A

Design Criteria Review Executive Summary

AECOM

105 Commerce Valley Drive West, Floor 7 905 886 7022 tel

Markham, ON, Canada L3T 7W3 905 886 9494 fax

www.aecom.com

Memorandum

Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final

To Region of Halton Page 1

CC

Subject Sustainable HaltonDesign Criteria ReviewExecutive Summary

From Chris Hamel

Date December 2010 Project Number 60114062

AECOM have prepared Water and Wastewater Design Criteria Memoranda for review, datedDecember 2010 to support the Sustainable Halton project. This memo is intended to provide anexecutive summary of the design criteria review as well as provide additional context.

Background

It has been typical practice to review the design criteria as part of the recent Master Plan updates forHalton Region. The focus of the previous design criteria reviews has been with respect to theresidential and employment water demand consumptions and wastewater flow generations. This iscommon practice to ensure that the projected water and wastewater flows are accurate and reflectnew trends to support decision making for the sizing and timing of future infrastructure including pipesand facilities.

The approach taken under Sustainable Halton has been more intensive than in the past. Not only toensure the projections are reasonable, but the review was considered more critical in light ofperceived and/or actual changes in recent water use/wastewater generation as well as greateremphasis in ranging future development in greenfield and intensification areas.

Approach

Moving forward, it is recommended that the overall application of the design criteria be integrated intoseveral related processes to ensure consistency between the processes:

i) Master Planningii) Development Application Reviewiii) Development Control Monitoring Report (DCMR)iv) Rate setting and revenue budgeting

The approach to project flows under previous Master Plans was to apply the design criteria to thehorizon year planning projections. This approach was reconciled against historical flows but was notnecessarily influenced by historical trends.

Page 2

Memorandum – Design Criteria Executive SummaryDecember 2010

Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final

The approach moving forward is based on establishing a yearly starting point, calculated fromhistorical flows, and projecting growth flows from this starting point forward. The rationale andrecommendation for this approach was documented in the Development Control Monitoring Reportreview. This approach is being implemented in the DCMR as well as the Master Plan processes andwill ensure continuity in projections as well will better serve reconciliation through the allocationprocesses.

Under this approach, the design criteria will be applied to the residential and employment growth onlyand added to the starting point to project interval year flows. As such, the design criteria mustestimate what will be consumed/generated and not necessarily what was consumed/generated.

An overall guiding principle for the design criteria is to ensure that the flow projections are adequatelypredicted with an appropriate level of safety and risk management in order that the infrastructure hassufficient capacity to meet the servicing requirements and that the timing of key infrastructure andfacilities does not compromise operation of the facilities or impede planned and approved growth. Onthis basis, for Master Planning purposes, the design criteria should reflect a total water productionneed which includes consumption and non-revenue water use.

A related task within the Region is revenue budgeting. The Region is tasked with balancing the coststo operate the systems with incoming revenue from water and sewer rates. Design criteria andprojected flows are utilized to estimate the future water and sewer uses to estimate future revenues.While the design criteria process does not specifically address the revenue budgeting process, it isrecommended that continuity with the information derived through the Master Planning process (ie:starting point) be considered. It was noted from review of the criteria analysis under the revenuebudgeting, that emphasis was placed on trending water use outside the peak summer months. Whilethis may be relevant to not over estimate revenues, criteria for master planning must specificallyaddress the peak summer months to ensure that level of service is maintained under worst caseconditions.

As mentioned, the following key issues were also considered during the design criteria reviewprocess:

i) Recent perceived/actual decreasing trends in water useii) Impact of “greener” more water efficient development moving forwardiii) Reconciliation of population projections and growth trends with respect to actual

conditionsiv) Potential to change (lower) the design criteria

These issues have been addressed in the following manner:i) The approach of deriving a new starting point each year will recognize any recent trends in

the historical water use or wastewater flows. The approach utilizes a 5-year rolling averagein order to appropriately consider variances over the 5 years and not simply rely on theprevious year only.

ii) It is recognized that the Region’s water efficiency program will continue to be implementedmoving forward. Through co-ordination with the Region team, a 5% reduction in waterdemand projections was established for the future projections. This was considered inestablishing the design criteria.

Page 3

Memorandum – Design Criteria Executive SummaryDecember 2010

Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final

iii) By changing the approach to reflect growth from the starting point as opposed to using thehorizon year projections only, there will be improved reconciliation between internalprocesses as well as improved accuracy with actual conditions. This approach will betterintegrate the process of monitoring uptake of single dwelling equivalents (SDEs), accountingfor committed SDEs and projecting future uptake rates of SDEs.

iv) In order to consider the need to change the design criteria, a review of available informationwas undertaken. Also a methodology of calculating and comparing the design criteria undermultiple analyses was undertaken to attempt to validate the recommendations.

Methodology

In attempt to provide a more defendable review process, it was determined to evaluate the designcriteria for both water and wastewater under multiple methodologies and reconcile the findings.

The principal methodologies used are as follows:

Water

1. Review historical plant production data to determine an equivalent criteria (inclusive ofresidential and employment requirements)

2. Review historical consumption data from billing to determine separately residential andemployment consumption

3. Utilize sample area consumption data to refine residential consumptions and employmentconsumptions using a cross section of areas throughout the Region. This process wasintending to determine trends in sub-categories such as low, medium and high densityresidential.

4. Review District Meter Area (DMA) analysis undertaken by the Region. This data set providesadditional information of cross section areas throughout the Region. It also provides anothercomparative for the equivalent criteria.

5. Review of the historical peaking factors at the plants

Wastewater

Given that there is limited data sets available for wastewater as there is not the same level of meteredbilling data for customers, the methodologies available are more limited.

1. Review historical plant treatment data to determine an equivalent criteria for average flows(inclusive of residential and employment requirements)

2. Further review of historical plant treatment data to analyze dry weather flow conditions3. Correlate the water use billing data with the plant dry weather flow to estimate residential and

employment criteria

The detailed analysis of these methods are provided in the December 2010 design criteria memos.

Page 4

Memorandum – Design Criteria Executive SummaryDecember 2010

Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final

The overview of the results from this analysis is summarized as follows:

Analysis of the different methodologies did not provide consistent comparative results thatcould be used to definitively recommend design criteria

The analysis for varied land uses also provided varied results with no clear pattern There were not sufficiently definitive results to provide support in changing the existing

Regional design criteria However, the overall plant service area analysis did validate and demonstrate reasonable

accuracy of using existing Regional design criteria There was sufficient information available to recommend different South Halton and North

Halton maximum day peaking factors There was sufficient information available to recommend same wastewater criteria for new

growth in South Halton and North Halton

Summary and Rationale

Water

Based on the design criteria review and analysis, it is recommended that the existing Regionalaverage day water design criteria be maintained for the South Halton lake based and North Haltongroundwater based system. As such, it is recommended that all new growth throughout the Regionutilize the common criteria below:

Average Day Water Design Criteria

Lpcd Residential 330

L/emp/d Industrial 302

Commercial 213

Institutional 74

Based on historical trending, the following maximum day and peak hour peaking factors should beused:

Water Design Criteria Max

PF

Peak

PF

Lake Based OAK, BURL, MIL,

GT1.9

3Groundwater

Based

MIL

1.6GT

ACT

Page 5

Memorandum – Design Criteria Executive SummaryDecember 2010

Sustainable Halton Design Criteria Exec Summary Dec10Final

Wastewater

Based on the design criteria review and analysis, it is recommended that the existing South Haltonaverage day wastewater design criteria be maintained for the South Halton lake based systems andNorth Halton stream based systems. As such, it is recommended that all new growth throughout theRegion utilize the common criteria below:

Average Day Wastewater Design Criteria

Lpcd Residential 365

L/emp/d Industrial 410

Commercial 260

Institutional 135

The methodology used to determine peak wet weather flow remains valid and is being used in thismaster plan. The peak wastewater flow criteria of 0.286 L/s/ha is being applied to new growththroughout the Region for evaluating wastewater collection system capacity.

The rationale for these recommendations is as follows:

There is insufficient information to definitively recommend a change in criteria or recommendnew criteria classifications such as low, medium and high density residential.

The existing Regional criteria did closely match actual conditions when applied at the plantservice area level.

Historical and recent trends in water production and use and wastewater generation andtreatment are being considered and have been reflected in the updated approach using anew yearly starting point.

Decreasing water use trends are being accounted for in the 5% water efficiency approachand should not be double counted or further reduced in the base design criteria.

We expect to see similar water use and wastewater generation patterns for all new growthregardless of location. As such, it was considered reasonable to apply a common criteria toall new growth in either Burlington, Oakville, Milton or Halton Hills and only reflect uniquepeaking factors in South Halton and North Halton.

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011

APPEDIX B

Benefit to Existing and Oversizing Calculations

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges UpdateTechnical Report

Appendix B - Benefit to Existing Calculations

Water

Regional ID Project DescriptionTotal Project Cost

Estimate2012$

BTE % (see demand

tables for service areas)

BTE2012$

Benefit to Existing Rationale

6605 W 750 mm WM Second feed to Washburn Reservoir $24,096,000 82% $19,759,000Existing water system has constraints in water supply feed to Washburn Reservoir. This project is required to support water supply under existing conditions (existing rated pumping capacity of Washburn) as well as to support supply to future growth in Burlington. Washburn Pumping Station also supports transfer to Oakville system and growth in Oakville. Demand percentage based on Burlington demands and 20 MLD transfer to Oakville. 142 MLD existing / 172 MLD total future = 82%.

6661 W 900 mm Second Feedermain to Davis Road Booster Pumping Station $14,171,000 48% $6,802,000Existing water system has constraints in water supply feed to 8th Line trunk infrastructure. This project is required to support water supply under existing conditions (existing rated pumping capacity of Davis Rd Pumping Station) as well as to support supply to future growth in Oakville, Milton and Georgetown. Demand percentage based on Oakville, Milton and Georgetown service area.

6665 W 400 mm Zone B4 WM between Tyandanga Reservoir and Beaufort Reservoir (Twin existing WM) $6,602,000 92% $6,081,000There are existing constraints with the transfer capacity to the Beaufort Reservoir and in the Burlington B4 pressure zone. This project is required to support existing demands and future demands in Burlington. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.

6669 W 4.5 ML storage expansion at Tyandanga Reservoir, within existing site. $4,660,000 92% $4,292,000There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. This facility provides floating storage as well as operational storage for supply to downstream pressure zones. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.

There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands Demand percentage6670 W 2.5 ML storage expansion at Beaufort Reservoir Expansion, new site required. $3,275,000 92% $3,016,000

There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. Demand percentagebased on Burlington service area.

6601 W 7.8 ML/d expansion at Beaufort Pumping Station, new site required. $2,015,000 92% $1,856,000There is currently operational constraints and site constraints at the existing pumping station. This project is required to alleviate these constraints and support continued supply to existing customers and support future demands. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.

6671 W 6.6 ML/d expansion at Brant St Pumping Station, within existing building. $735,000 92% $677,000There is currently operational constraints at the existing pumping station. This project is required to alleviate these constraints and support continued supply to existing customers and support future demands. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.

6602 W 7.5 ML storage expansion at Waterdown Reservoir, within existing site. $7,767,000 92% $7,154,000There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. This facility provides floating storage as well as operational storage for supply to downstream pressure zones. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.

6672 W 11.5 ML storage expansion at Brant St Reservoir, within existing site. $12,321,000 92% $11,348,000There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. This facility provides floating storage as well as operational storage for supply to downstream pressure zones. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.

6673 W 5.5 ML storage expansion at Mount Forest Reservoir, within existing site. $5,696,000 92% $5,246,000There is currently insufficient storage to meet existing demands. This project is required to provide additional storage to support servicing to existing users as well as to support future demands. This facility provides floating storage as well as operational storage for supply to downstream pressure zones. Demand percentage based on Burlington service area.

6674 W 13.5 ML storage expansion at Washburn Reservoir, within existing site. $13,980,000 82% $11,464,000Existing water system has constraints in water storage at the Washburn Reservoir and transfer capacity for downstream pressure zones. This project is required to support water supply under existing conditions (existing rated capacity of Washburn) as well as to support supply to future growth in Burlington. Washburn Reservoir and Pumping Station also supports transfer to Oakville system and growth in Oakville. Demand percentage based on Burlington demands and 20 MLD transfer to Oakville. 142 MLD existing / 172 MLD total future = 82%.

6676 W Acton Artificial Recharge Study $500,000 50% $250,000This project is required to maximize the available capacity of the groundwater well supplies. This study will review application to existing well supplies and existing rated capacity as well as for future well supplies. The outcome and determination of the application for existing vs future capacity is unknown at this time. It is anticipated that there will be equal benefit to existing and future.

6677 W Acton Artificial Recharge Capital Works $6,300,000 50% $3,150,000This project is required to maximize the available capacity of the groundwater well supplies. This project represents the potential capital resulting from the study recommendations. The outcome and determination of the application for existing vs future capacity is unknown at this time. It is anticipated that there will be equal benefit to existing and future.

6678 W Georgetown Artificial Recharge Study $500,000 50% $250,000This project is required to maximize the available capacity of the groundwater well supplies. This study will review application to existing well supplies and existing rated capacity as well as for future well supplies. The outcome and determination of the application for existing vs future capacity is unknown at this time. It is anticipated that there will be equal benefit to existing and future.

6679 W Georgetown Artificial Recharge Capital Works $29,600,000 50% $14,800,000This project is required to maximize the available capacity of the groundwater well supplies. This project represents the potential capital resulting from the study recommendations. The outcome and determination of the application for existing vs future capacity is unknown at this time. It is anticipated that there will be equal benefit to existing and future.

6680 W Oakville WPP Intake Pipe Extension (Design) $1,500,000 10% $150,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.

6681 W Oakville WPP Intake Pipe Extension (Construction) $8,500,000 10% $850,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.

6682 WClass EA Study of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d. (Including Standby Generator and Intake Pipe Extension)

$1,000,000 10% $100,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.

6683 W Design of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d. $3,464,000 10% $346,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.

6684 W Construction of Oakville WPP Expansion from 109 to 130 ML/d. $20,803,000 10% $2,080,000The Oakville WPP project is focused on providing additional capacity for new growth. The project scope is anticipated to include works required to refurbish and upgrade components of the existing facility. There is inherent benefit to the existing rated capacity of the facility through implementation of the upgrades. The BTE has been established as a general 10%.

4950 W SCADA Master Plan Review for Water Purification Plants and Distribution Systems (REG) $200,000 63% $126,000This is a Region wide project. The project will address existing and future facilities. This project will support existing operational requirements for existing capacity as well as future operational requirements for future capacity. Demand percentage based on Region wide service area.

5917 W SCADA System Network Architecture Improvement Program (REG) $150,000 63% $95,000This is a Region wide project. The project will address existing and future facilities. This project will support existing operational requirements for existing capacity as well as future operational requirements for future capacity. Demand percentage based on Region wide service area.

This is a Region wide project The project will address existing and future facilities This project will support existing operational requirements for existing capacity as well as future operational requirements for future5918 W Electrical Utility Meter Monitoring Installation Program (SCADA) (REG) $190,000 63% $120,000

This is a Region wide project. The project will address existing and future facilities. This project will support existing operational requirements for existing capacity as well as future operational requirements for futurecapacity. Demand percentage based on Region wide service area.

6318 W 300mm WM on No 14 Sideroad from Tremaine Rd. to Milton Reservoir (MIL) $1,045,515 78% $815,000This project is integral to the groudwater supply strategy for Milton This project is required to support the existing users and related infil in the Milton groundwater service area only. Demand percentage based on Milton groundwater service area.

6663 W 400 mm WM from 9th Line on easement to Bristol Circle (Zone O3) $3,008,000 90% $2,707,000 This project is primarily related to providing additonal security of supply to the Bristol Circle area and benefit to the existing users. This project does support some overall secirty of supply to the O3 pressure zone through the PRV back feed from O4. As such, 10% was considered DC eligible.

$172,078,515 $103,534,000 Sub-Total Water

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges UpdateTechnical Report

Appendix B - Benefit to Existing Calculations

Wastewater

Regional ID Project DescriptionTotal Project Cost

Estimate2012$

BTE % (see demand

tables for service areas)

BTE2012$

Benefit to Existing Rationale

4810 S Long Term Biosolids Implementation Plan $20,780,000 59% $12,260,000This project is focused on implementing strategies identiified in the 2009 Biosolids Management Master Plan. It will support existing and future users within the Region. The 2009 Biosolids Management Master Plan identified 59% benefit to existing

6541 S Deep Trunk Sewer on Rebecca St and Lakeshore Rd W from Wilson St to Oakville SW WWTP $45,501,590 35% $15,926,000This project will service the UGC growth in Oakville as well as relieve the existing constraints along the Rebecca St Trunk Sewer. The Benefit to Existing is based on transferred flow from existing areas resulting from WWPS decommissioning relative to the capacity of the new trunk sewer.

6528, 6544, 6545, 6547

S Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Intensification Areas $1,487,000 28% $412,000Four wastewater pumping station upgrades are required due to intensification. These projects will support existing areas as well as new growth within the urban boundary. For projects where deficiencies exist, the benefitto existing is calcualted based on the ratio between the current flow above the existing firm capacity and future flow above the existing firm capacity.

$67,768,590 $28,598,000Sub-Total Wastewater

$239,847,105 $132,132,000Totals

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges UpdateTechnical Report

Appendix B - Benefit to Existing CalculationsService Area Water Demands

Pressure Zone2011 Max (MLD)

Day Demand2031 Max (MLD)

Day DemandGrowth (MLD) % Flow Growth % Flow Existing

B1 61.36 68.79 7.43 11% 89%B1A 8.63 9.25 0.63 7% 93%

B3A, B4A, B5A 0.59 1.19 0.60 51% 49%B1B 0.16 0.18 0.01 9% 91%B2 30.40 31.94 1.54 5% 95%B3 32.86 35.00 2.14 6% 94%B4 5.60 5.83 0.23 4% 96%B5 0.18 0.17 -0.01 0% 100%

M4L 5.63 82.03 76.40 93% 7%M5L 43.20 84.26 41.06 49% 51%M5G 12.31 15.30 2.99 20% 80%G6L 0.00 19.81 19.81 100% 0%

G5G, G6G, G7G 24.48 24.15 -0.33 0% 100%A9G 5.40 7.86 2.46 31% 69%O1 36.86 42.64 5.78 14% 86%O2 30.56 42.56 12.00 28% 72%

O2A 3.48 3.32 -0.16 0% 100%O3 47.15 55.74 8.59 15% 85%O4 11.35 43.67 32.32 74% 26%

Rural 12.21 12.44 0.23 2% 98%Glen Williams 1.02 1.14 0.12 10% 90%

Norval 0.25 0.29 0.04 14% 86%

Service Area2011 Max (MLD)

Day Demand2031 Max (MLD)

Day DemandGrowth (MLD) % Flow Growth % Flow Existing

Burlington 139.77 152.35 12.58 8% 92%

Oakville 129.40 187.94 58.54 31% 69%

Burlington and Oakville 269.17 340.28 71.11 21% 79%

Milton Groundwater 12.31 15.84 3.53 22% 78%

Milton Lake 48.83 165.75 116.92 71% 29%

Milton 61.14 181.59 120.45 66% 34%

South Halton 330.31 521.87 191.56 37% 63%

Acton 5.40 7.86 2.46 31% 69%

Georgetown Groundwater 24.48 23.21 -1.27 -5% 105%

Georgetown Lake 1.30 22.18 20.88 94% 6%

Georgetown 25.78 45.39 19.61 43% 57%

Halton Hills 31.18 53.25 22.07 41% 59%

Oakville, Milton Lake and Georgetown Lake

179.52 375.86 196.34 52% 48%

Region 361.49 575.13 213.64 37% 63%

Region of Halton2012 Development Charges UpdateTechnical Report

Appendix B - Oversizing Calculations

Regional ID Project DescriptionTotal Project Cost

Estimate2012$

Oversizing % Oversizing Portion

2012$Oversizing Rationale

6666 W750 mm zone M4L WM on James Snow Parkway from North Oakville to Milton. From Burnhamthorpe Rd W to Lower Base Line W (Incorporated From Bridge)

8,136,000$ 90% 7,322,000$

2031 water supply capacity to the Milton and Halton Hills service areas is primarily provided through the Zone 5 spine and the Zone 4 2nd spine. This feedermain provides additional security of supply to Zone 4 as well as provides improved level of service to Zone 4. The feedermain capacity will support future growth beyond 2031. It is estimated that the feedermain provides 10% benefit to the 2031 service area.

6699 WBurloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Design) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d

11,849,000$ 90% 10,664,000$

The total water supply capacity for the 2031 service area requires capacity just beyond 165 MLD at Burloak WPP. The expansion from 165 MLD to 220 MLD is triggered within the 2031 time period but the capacity is substantially required for post 2031 growth. 5.5 MLD of the 55 MLD expansion (10%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of capacity is oversizing.

6700 WBurloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Construction) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d includes Zone 1 Pumping expansion by 25 ML/D

76,008,000$ 90% 68,407,000$

The total water supply capacity for the 2031 service area requires capacity just beyond 165 MLD at Burloak WPP. The expansion from 165 MLD to 220 MLD is triggered within the 2031 time period but the capacity is substantially required for post 2031 growth. 5.5 MLD of the 55 MLD expansion (10%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of capacity is oversizing.

6770 WBurloak Treatment Plant Expansion by 55 ML/d (Class EA Study) From 165 ML/d to 220 ML/d includes Zone 1 Pumping expansion by 25 ML/D

1,323,000$ 90% 1,191,000$

The total water supply capacity for the 2031 service area requires capacity just beyond 165 MLD at Burloak WPP. The expansion from 165 MLD to 220 MLD is triggered within the 2031 time period but the capacity is substantially required for post 2031 growth. 5.5 MLD of the 55 MLD expansion (10%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of capacity is oversizing.

6701 W Kitchen Zone 3 Pumping Station expansion by 80 ML/d 12,000,000$ 67% 8,040,000$

Additional Zone 3 pumping capacity is required to support the 2031 needs. The next expansion at the Kitchen pumping station will require expansion to the building. This project will provide a pumping station building expansion to support the mature stateneeds beyond 2031. The additional capacity for Zone 3 up to 2031 is approximately 45 MLD. The total building expansion will support an additional 135 MLD. 45 MLD of the total 135 MLD (33%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of costs is oversizing.

5850 W1050 mm WM on Upper Middle Rd from Burloak Dr west to Appleby Line. Zone 2 feedermain. (Construction)

8,514,000$ 34% 2,855,000$

This feedermain will support water supply to meet the 2031 needs. This is also a critical feedermain for mature state post 2031 servicing. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 750 mm watermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1050 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1050 mm feedermain and a 750 mm feedermain.

5867 W 1200 mm WM on Britannia Rd from 4th Line to RR 25. Zone 4 feedermain. 19,529,000$ 32% 6,167,000$

The post 2031 servicing strategy will require a new water supply feed to Milton. It is anticipated that this feedermain will ultimately connect to Britannia Road and support supply to the Trafalgar feedermain. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 750 mm feedermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1200 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1200 mm feedermain and a 750 mm feedermain.

6367 W120 ML/d Burloak Pumping Station (Zone 2). (1,389 l/s) (Phase 1 50 ML/d pump installation, facility constructed to house future pumps)

12,522,000$ 67% 8,390,000$

This facility is required to meet the servicing needs for the 2031 service areas. This facility is also critical for the long term mature state strategy for post 2031 growth. The facility will be constructed to support the ultimate capacity. However, 40 MLD of the 120 MLD future capacity will be installed within the 2031 period. 40 MLD of the total 120 MLD (33%) is required for growth in the 2031 service area. The balance of costs is oversizing.

6364 W1500 mm WM from Zone 2 Burloak PS to Kitchen Reservoir (Zone O1) (Construction)

53,062,000$ 10% 5,400,000$

This feedermain will support water supply to meet the 2031 needs. This is also a critical feedermain for mature state post 2031 servicing. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 1350 mm watermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1500 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1500 mm feedermain and a 1350 mm feedermain.

6365 W1800 mm WM from Burloak WPP to Burloak Zone 2 Booster Pumping Station (Zone O1) (Construction)

17,460,000$ 18% 3,200,000$

This feedermain will support water supply to meet the 2031 needs. This is also a critical feedermain for mature state post 2031 servicing. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 1500 mm watermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1800 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1800 mm feedermain and a 1500 mm feedermain.

6368 W1050 mm WM from Burloak Pumping Station (Zone 2) north on Burloak Dr to Upper Middle Rd (not including QEW crossing). Zone 2 feedermain. (construction)

6,515,000$ 42% 2,711,000$

This feedermain will support water supply to meet the 2031 needs. This is also a critical feedermain for mature state post 2031 servicing. This section of feedermain is being oversized to support the post 2031 strategy. A 750 mm watermain would be required for 2031 servicing only. The feedermain is recommended to be oversized to 1050 mm for post 2031. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1050 mm feedermain and a 750 mm feedermain.

5945 S Mid-Halton new effluent sewer/outfall - Construction $ 90,000,000 29% $ 26,100,000

This project is required to provide additional outfall capacity to meet the 2031 needs as well as post 2031 needs. The outfall sewer capacity will be designed to match the ultimate site capacity of the Mid Halton WWTP. It has been determined that a 1800 mm outfall sewer would service the 2031 flows. It is estimated that a 2400 mm outfall sewer would service the ultimate site capacity. The oversizing has been calculated as the cost difference between a 1800 mm sewer and a 2400 mm sewer.

316,918,000$ 150,447,000$ Totals

AECOM Region of Halton 2012 Development Charges Update Technical Report

RPT-2011-08-25-Halton DC Tech Report V11.Docx 25/08/2011

APPENDIX C

Local Service Guidelines

Region of Halton 2012 DC Background Study

G2-1

2. LOCAL SERVICE POLICY

2.1 Water and Wastewater

The following guideline sets out in general the size of water and wastewater infrastructure that

constitutes a development charge project. Other infrastructure will be treated as a local service,

which is the direct responsibility of a landowner under a development agreement.

2.1.1 Watermains

Internal to the development (servicing of vacant lands)

• Greater than 400 mm:

Development charges main

• 400 mm or less:

Developer responsibility within subdivision agreement

External to the development (mains on existing roads but requiring a local

connection)

• 400 mm or greater:

Development charges main

• Less than 400 mm:

Developer responsibility within subdivision agreement

Exception to these policies is feeder mains required to connect from a well or reservoir

to the network. All feeder mains are considered to be development charges projects

regardless of the size of the main.

External watermains of any size required for a development to be connected to an

existing local main are considered to be the developers' responsibility.

Region of Halton 2012 DC Background Study

G2-2

2.1.2 Booster Stations and Reservoirs

All water booster pumping stations and reservoirs projects are considered to be

development charges projects.

2.1.3 Wastewater Mains

Internal or external (i.e., local connection) to the development

• Greater than 450 mm:

Development charges main

• 450 mm or less:

Developer responsibility within subdivision agreement

2.1.4 Lift Stations

Lift stations internal to a development and fed by mains which qualify for the

development charges project list are considered to be development charges projects.

Lift stations fed by mains that do not qualify for the development charges project list

are the responsibility of the developer

Existing lift stations that have to be expanded as part of a new development are the

responsibility of the benefiting developer and will be dealt with as part of the

subdivision agreement

The above policy guidelines are general principles by which staff will be guided in considering

development applications. However, each application will be considered on its own merits

having regard to, among other factors, the nature, type and location of the development and any

existing and proposed development in the surrounding area, these policy guidelines, the

location and type of services required and their relationship to the proposed development and

existing and proposed development in the area, and subsection 59(2) of the Development

Charges Act, 1997.