2011 minnesota state and local tax incidence presentation analysis for 2008 projections to 2013 a...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation
Analysis for 2008
Projections to 2013
A full copy of the study can be found on our website athttp://taxes.state.mn.us/legal_policy/pages/research_reports_research_reports.aspx
House Tax CommitteeApril 27, 2011
1
![Page 2: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
History of the Report
Statutory mandate Who pays Minnesota state and local taxes?
11th biennial study Tax years 1988 through 2008
Modifications over the years 5-year projections added Income deciles as well as population deciles More demographic detail added Appendix C with more detail by tax
2
![Page 3: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Outline Strengths of the Report
Looks at Minnesota state & local tax system as a whole Includes business taxes as well as taxes on individuals Includes all Minnesota households Broad definition of income Historical perspective
Brief Summary of Results Sources of Confusion
Why is average income so much lower than in Census? Household variations Business taxes: Average vs. incremental incidence 2008 or 2013? Income deciles or population deciles?
3
![Page 4: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Strengths of the Study
1. Includes all Minnesota state and local taxes Not just state taxes. Not just the income tax. Not just General Fund taxes. Focus on the distribution of the combined burden of all
Minnesota state and local taxes.
4
![Page 5: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Business Taxes (CY 2013) $ Millions Percent
Business Property Taxes (includes rental property) $4,405 50%
Sales Tax on business inputs (includes MVST) 2,623 30%
Corporate Franchise Tax 830 9%
Motor Fuels Tax on fuels used by business 351 4%
Vehicle Registration Tax on business vehicles 137 2%
Local Gross Earnings Taxes 123 2%
Insurance Premiums Tax on business insurance 109 1%
Mining Production Tax 91 1%
Mortgage & Deed Taxes 37 < 1%
Solid Waste Taxes on business waste 37 < 1%
TOTAL Business Taxes $8,744 100%
Percent of Total Taxes 32.3%
on business property
2. Includes Business Taxes
5
![Page 6: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Taxes on Individuals (CY 2013) $ Millions Percent
Individual Income Tax $8,484 46%
Sales Tax on consumer purchases (includes MVST)
4,272 19% Homeowner & Cabin Property Taxes
3,411 23%
MNCare Provider Taxes 557 3%
Motor Fuels Tax on fuel used by individuals 540 3%
Motor Vehicle Registration Taxes 458 2%
Cigarette & Tobacco Taxes
(non-business)
423 2%
Insurance Premiums Tax 285 2%
Estate Tax
on individual insurance
173 1%
Mortgage & Deed Taxes 120 1%
Alcohol Taxes 81 <1%
Gambling Taxes 41 <1%
Solid Waste Taxes on consumer waste 33 <1%
Property Tax Refunds - 550 -3%
TOTAL Taxes on Individuals $18,327 100%
Percent of Total Taxes 67.7%
on homes and cabins
6
![Page 7: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Business tax incidence (See pp. 87-99)
Estimate how much of each tax is: Shifted forward to consumers in higher prices Shifted back to workers in lower wages Borne by owners as lower profits
Varies by type of business Long-run incidence – assumes businesses have fully
adjusted to the tax.
Exported tax burden Estimates that 16 percent of Minnesota state and local
taxes are “exported” to non-residents.
7
![Page 8: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3. Not limited to income tax filers
11.5% of households do not file income tax returns. (7.5% file neither PTR nor income tax.) Many non-filers are seniors.
Sample includes detailed income and tax information for each of 105,000 households. (See pp. 81-85) Data on household income, income tax, homeowner
property tax, PTR, and motor vehicle registration tax (“hard match”).
Estimated burdens for each of the other taxes.
8
![Page 9: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Sample of 105,000 households is weighted to represent 2.54 million households
Divided into 10 groups (“deciles”) each with 254,000 households Lowest-income 254,000 in 1st decile
Incomes less than $9,795 Highest-income 254,000 in 10th decile
Incomes $129,567 or more
9
![Page 10: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Income in this study includes all money income Federal Gross Income (may be negative!)
Nontaxable Social Security and pension income Nontaxable interest income Workers’ compensation cash payments Cash MFIP payments Voluntary contributions to deferred compensation
However … income does not include: In-kind assistance (food stamps, housing assistance,
medical assistance) Fringe benefits Pre-tax payments for health insurance or medical care
4. Uses broad measure of income (See pp. 82-85)
10
![Page 11: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Results for 2008
32.5%
13.3%
11.7% 11.8% 12.1% 12.3% 12.1% 12.2% 11.7%10.3% 10.0% 9.7%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Top 5%
Top 1%
Per
cen
t
Population Deciles
All Taxes Effective Tax Rate ("ETR") by Decile for 2008
Average = 11.5%
Over $130,000
Over $183,000
Over $429,000
11
![Page 12: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
First Decile Problem (See p. 17)
ETR = 32.5%, far higher than other deciles
Tax burden over-estimated for several reasons Some temporarily low income (e.g., business losses)
12,500 households with negative incomes averaging -$120,000.
Income understated in sample as well as in the Consumer Expenditure Survey (used to estimate burden of consumer taxes)
In-kind income excluded
12
![Page 13: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Progressive or Regressive?
Suits Index - A convenient way of comparing the degree of regressivity, progressivity or proportionality of a tax
-1Perfectly RegressiveAll Paid by Lowest
Income Group
0Proportional
+1Perfectly ProgressiveAll Paid by Highest
Income Group
Progressive – ETR rises with income Regressive – ETR falls with income Proportional – ETR same at all incomes
2008 All Taxes: Suits = - 0.060 (somewhat regressive)
13
![Page 14: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2008 Tax Incidence by Tax Type
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Top 5%
Top 1%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
All Other (12%, -0.291)
S&L Sales Tax (22%, -0.229)
Nonresidential Ptx (10%, -0.193)
Res. Ptx after PTR (21%, -0.159)
Income Tax (35%, +0.218)
Population Deciles
Pe
rce
nt
of
Inc
om
e
Note: Numbers in parentheses show percent of total tax burden and the full-sample Suits index.
14
![Page 15: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Impact of Refundable Income Tax Credits
Total with credits = 4.1% Total without credits = 4.2%
See pp. 56-57
15
![Page 16: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Impact of PTR on Residential Property Taxes*
6.9%
2.0% 2.1%2.6% 2.8% 3.0% 2.9%
2.9%
2.6% 1.6%
10.1%
3.8%3.5% 3.6% 3.4% 3.3% 3.1%
3.0%
2.6%
1.6%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Per
cen
t
Population Deciles
Residential Property Taxes by Decile for 2008
With PTR (-0.159) Without PTR (-0.215)
* Homeowners and Renters. Excludes cabins.See pp. 58-59
16
![Page 17: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Sources of Confusion1. Household definition differs from Census
This Study: 2.54 million households Median income $41,161 Average persons per household: 2.02
Census 2.09 million households Median income $57,000 Average persons per household: 2.43
Both are correct (See pp. 78-79) This Study: Taxpayer + any spouse or dependents Census: “all who occupy a housing unit” (but not
those in “group quarters”) Total population in this study matches Census
17
![Page 18: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
2. Median Income is $41,161 Overall, but …
9,796 – 16,278
9,795 & Under
1
Pop. Decile Household Income
10
$129,567 & Over
89,937 – 129,566
68,697 – 89,936
53,315 – 68,696
31,690 – 41,162
23,692 – 31,689
16,279 – 23,691
41,161 – 53,314
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
9
$87,126
$82,541
$59,122
$25,895
$25,219
$25,050
See pp. 69-70
18
![Page 19: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Decile Variations
Family Type by Population Decile
See p. 69
19
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Single Not Seniors
Single Seniors
Married Seniors
Married No Children
Single Parent with Children
Married with Children
Population Decile
Pe
rce
nt
of
All
Ho
us
eh
old
s
![Page 20: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Results Limited to a Single Household Type
Take population of “married couples with children,” divide into 10 groups, and summarize results.
(See Table 5-1 on p. 72)
See pp. 71-77 for other household types.
20
![Page 21: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
3. Business Tax Incidence: A Warning
Study assumes all states impose taxes simultaneously.
An existing tax on capital is broken into three parts: Average tax on national capital Average sector differential Minnesota differential
“Incremental incidence” for a CHANGE in tax will differ from the “average incidence” reported in the study. For a change in tax, the change all represents
“Minnesota differential” Incremental incidence should include federal tax offset.
(See pp. 61-62)
21
![Page 22: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Average Incidence
Incremen-tal Inci-dence
Average Incidence
Incremen-tal Inci-dence
Average Incidence
Incremen-tal Inci-dence
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
44%35%
5% 7%
40%
64%
9% 23%
42%
5%
8%
3%
44%
12%
42%
7%87%
28%
16%
4%35%
20% 20% Federal Government
Exported Other
MN Capital
MN Labor
MN Con-sumers
Corporate Tax
Industrial Property Tax
Apartment Property Tax
Average vs. Incremental Incidence
22
![Page 23: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
32.5%
13.3%11.7% 11.8% 12.1% 12.3% 12.1% 12.2% 11.7%
10.3% 10.0% 9.7%
30.5%
12.1% 11.0% 11.6% 12.1% 12.1% 12.1% 12.3% 11.9% 10.4% 10.1% 9.7%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Top5%
Top1%
Per
cen
t
Population Deciles
2008 2013
Average 2013 = 11.5% Suits = -0.052 Average 2008 = 11.5% Suits = -0.060
4. Results for 2008 or Projection to 2013? (2013 assumes current law)
2013 Projections based on Feb. 2011 Economic Forecast
Effective Tax Rates for 2008 and 2013
23
![Page 24: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Pe
rce
nt
Population Deciles
2008 2013
Average 2008 = 8.2% Suits = -0.004 Average 2013 = 8.0% Suits = +0.009
State Taxes
2013 projections based on Feb. 2011 Economic Forecast
Effective Tax Rates for 2008 and 2013
State share drops from 70.9% to 68.9%.
24
![Page 25: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Per
cen
t
Population Deciles
2008 2013
Average 2008 = 3.3% Suits = -0.202Average 2013 = 3.5% Suits = -0.192
Local Taxes
2013 projections based on Feb. 2011 Economic Forecast
Effective Tax Rates for 2008 and 2013
Local share rises from 29.1% to 31.1%.
25
![Page 26: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2008 to 2013
Local includes county, city, town, school district, and special taxing district taxes.
32.1% 32.7%31.9%
30.9%
28.2% 28.0%
24.6%25.8% 26.4%
29.1%
31.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2013 (est)
Loca
l Tax
es a
s Per
cent
of S
tate
& Lo
cal T
axes
Local Tax Share of Minnesota State and Local Taxes
26
![Page 27: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
5. Alternative Presentation: Income Deciles (See pp. 46-51)
More detail at lower incomes.
More detail at upper incomes.
Bottom income decile includes lowest four population deciles.
Top population decile includestop four income deciles.
DecilePercent of
HouseholdsPercent of
Income DecilePercent of
HouseholdsPercent of
Income1 10% 1% 1 41% 10%2 10% 2% 2 17% 10%3 10% 3% 3 12% 10%4 10% 4% 4 9% 10%5 10% 5% 5 7% 10%6 10% 7% 6 6% 10%7 10% 9% 7 4% 10%8 10% 12% 8 3% 10%9 10% 16% 9 1% 10%
10 10% 42% 10 0.3% 10%
Top 5% 5% 31% Top 5% 0.03% 5%
Income DecilesPopulation Deciles
27
![Page 28: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Income Deciles for 2008
13.8%
12.1% 12.2% 12.2%11.9% 11.6%11.8%
10.7%9.2%
9.7%
7.8%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Top 5%
Pe
rce
nt
Income Deciles
All Taxes ETRs by Income Decile for 2008
Average = 11.5%
First 4 population
deciles 10th population
decile (10.9%)Only 836
households
28
![Page 29: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
History
2013 projections based on Feb. 2011 Economic Forecast
Effective Tax Rates (All Taxes) by Year
12.0% 12.4% 13.0% 12.9%12.0%
11.2% 11.3% 11.6% 11.4%11.5% 11.5%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
1990 (adj.)
1992 (adj.)
1994 (adj.)
1996 (adj.)
1998 (adj.)
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2013 (est.)
Per
cen
t
Year
29
![Page 30: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
History and Projection of Suits Index
2013 projections based on Feb. 2011 Economic Forecast
History Forecast
Ove
rall
Su
its
Ind
ex
30
![Page 31: 2011 Minnesota State and Local Tax Incidence Presentation Analysis for 2008 Projections to 2013 A full copy of the study can be found on our website](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051820/56649e175503460f94b01fc9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Income Share of Top 5 Percent
2013 projections based on Feb. 2011 Economic Forecast
How much is tax policy? How much is the economy?
26.0% 27.1% 26.2%28.3%
31.5% 31.4%
28.1%29.8%
32.2% 31.1% 30.4%
0%
7%
14%
21%
28%
35%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2013 (est.)Base Year
History Forecast
Ove
rall
Su
its
Ind
ex
31