2005 plantstresshypothesesis joernmole chemecol

22
THE PLANT STRESS HYPOTHESIS AND VARIABLE RESPONSES BY BLUE GRAMA GRASS (Bouteloua gracilis) TO WATER, MINERAL NITROGEN, AND INSECT HERBIVORY ANTHONY JOERN 1, * and SIMON MOLE 2,3 1 Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0118, USA (Received January 3, 2005; revised May 9, 2005; accepted May 17, 2005) Abstract—Acting simultaneously or sequentially, plants encounter multiple stresses from combined abiotic and biotic factors that result in decreased growth and internal reallocation of resources. The plant stress hypothesis predicts that environmental stresses on plants decrease plant resistance to insect herbivory by altering biochemical sourceYsink relationships and foliar chemistry, leading to more palatable food. Such changes in the nutritional landscape for insects may facilitate insect population outbreaks during periods of moderate stress on host plants. We examined the plant stress hypothesis with field experiments in continental grassland (USA) using the C 4 grass Bouteloua gracilis. Water, nitrogen fertilizer, and herbivory from the grass- feeding grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum were manipulated. Combined stresses from water and mineral-N in the soil decreased plant growth and altered foliar percent total N (TN) and percent total nonstructural carbohy- drate (TNC) concentrations in an additive fashion. Grasshopper herbivory affected final biomass only in dry years; plants compensated for tissue loss when rainfall was abundant. Foliar TN and TNC concentrations were dynamic with respect to variable climatic conditions and treatment combinations, showing significant interactions. Grasshopper herbivory had its greatest impact on TN or TNC in dry years, interacting with other forms of stress. Herbivory as a single factor had strong effects on TNC in years with normal precipitation, but not in a dry year. Performance (developmental rate and 0098-0331/05/0900-2069/0 # 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2069 Journal of Chemical Ecology, Vol. 31, No. 9, September 2005 ( #2005) DOI: 10.1007/s10886-005-6078-3 * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Current address: Boulder, CO, USA.

Upload: datura498762

Post on 04-Sep-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

estrés en plantas

TRANSCRIPT

  • THE PLANT STRESS HYPOTHESIS AND VARIABLE

    RESPONSES BY BLUE GRAMA GRASS

    (Bouteloua gracilis) TO WATER,

    MINERAL NITROGEN, AND

    INSECT HERBIVORY

    ANTHONY JOERN1,* and SIMON MOLE2,3

    1Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA2School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln,

    NE 68588-0118, USA

    (Received January 3, 2005; revised May 9, 2005; accepted May 17, 2005)

    AbstractActing simultaneously or sequentially, plants encounter multiple

    stresses from combined abiotic and biotic factors that result in decreased

    growth and internal reallocation of resources. The plant stress hypothesis

    predicts that environmental stresses on plants decrease plant resistance to

    insect herbivory by altering biochemical sourceYsink relationships and foliarchemistry, leading to more palatable food. Such changes in the nutritional

    landscape for insects may facilitate insect population outbreaks during periods

    of moderate stress on host plants. We examined the plant stress hypothesis

    with field experiments in continental grassland (USA) using the C4 grass

    Bouteloua gracilis. Water, nitrogen fertilizer, and herbivory from the grass-

    feeding grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum were manipulated. Combined

    stresses from water and mineral-N in the soil decreased plant growth and

    altered foliar percent total N (TN) and percent total nonstructural carbohy-

    drate (TNC) concentrations in an additive fashion. Grasshopper herbivory

    affected final biomass only in dry years; plants compensated for tissue loss

    when rainfall was abundant. Foliar TN and TNC concentrations were dynamic

    with respect to variable climatic conditions and treatment combinations,

    showing significant interactions. Grasshopper herbivory had its greatest

    impact on TN or TNC in dry years, interacting with other forms of stress.

    Herbivory as a single factor had strong effects on TNC in years with normal

    precipitation, but not in a dry year. Performance (developmental rate and

    0098-0331/05/0900-2069/0 # 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.

    2069

    Journal of Chemical Ecology, Vol. 31, No. 9, September 2005 (#2005)

    DOI: 10.1007/s10886-005-6078-3

    * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Current address: Boulder, CO, USA.

  • survival) by the grasshoppers Phoetaliotes nebrascensis and A. deorum were

    not greatly affected by plant stress in a manner consistent with the plant stress

    hypothesis.

    Key WordsVChewing insects, environmental stress hypothesis, functional-convergence-to-plant-stress hypothesis, grasshopper, insect herbivory, total

    foliar nitrogen, total nonstructural carbohydrates.

    INTRODUCTION

    Dynamic biochemical, physiological, and morphological responses by plants to

    environmental conditions are integrated at organ and whole-plant levels through

    a variety of sourceYsink relationships (Mooney and Chiariello, 1984; Bazzazand Grace, 1997). The plant stress hypothesis states that environmental stresses

    on plants decrease plant resistance to insect herbivory by altering whole-plant

    sourceYsink resource allocation schedules and foliar chemistry, thus changingfood palatability (Rhoades, 1983; Mattson and Haack, 1987; Louda and

    Collinge, 1992; White, 1993; Redak and Capinera, 1994; Koricheva et al.,

    1998; Huberty and Denno, 2004). Plant resource acquisition (light, water,

    carbon, elemental nutrients), internal resource allocation among tissues

    (sourceYsink relationships, translocation products), and partitioning of resourcesto different plant functions (growth, maintenance, reproduction, repair, defense,

    senescence) ultimately prescribe the nature and distribution of nutritional

    constituents within plants to herbivores (Mooney and Gilman, 1982; Bazzaz

    et al., 1987; Chapin et al., 1987; Mooney et al., 1991; Aerts and Chapin,

    2000)Voften considered growth optimization processes (Mooney and Winner,1991). Variation in water and soil nutrient availability coupled to herbivory may

    cause unpredictable levels of stress that alters plant metabolism in response to

    the action of one or all factors with consequences for plant growth (Trlica and

    Cook, 1971; Bokhari, 1978; Mooney et al., 1991; Louda and Collinge, 1992).

    The plant stress hypothesis was proposed as an environmentally deter-

    mined explanation for outbreaks of insect herbivores operating through plant

    condition (Rhoades, 1983; Waring and Cobb, 1992; Watt, 1992; Koricheva

    et al., 1998), in which improved nutritional quality of host plants experiencing

    intermediate levels of stress resulted in increased demographic performance by

    herbivores. Rhoades (1983) extended the hypothesis to also include reduced

    production of chemical defenses under stress conditions in addition to elevated

    nutritional quality. Experimental tests of the plant stress hypothesis for forest

    insects provide little general support of the hypothesis (Rhoades, 1983; Waring

    and Cobb, 1992; Watt, 1992; Koricheva et al., 1998). Although some insect

    feeding guilds (e.g., boring and sucking feeders) responded as predicted in

    experimental tests in woody plants, other groups including chewing insects did

    2070 JOERN AND MOLE

  • not generally respond to plant stress as predicted (Waring and Cobb, 1992;

    Watt, 1992; Koricheva et al., 1998; Huberty and Denno, 2004). However, about

    67% of the examples are consistent with predictions (Waring and Cobb, 1992)

    in observational studies of trees along environmental stress gradients, although

    alternate explanations exist (Watt, 1992). Although this system may be

    prototypical for the action of the plant stress hypothesis, few tests with grasses

    exist (Waring and Cobb, 1992; Redak and Capinera, 1994).

    We seek to clarify the nature of interactions among multiple stresses as

    they impact growth and variable leaf chemistry in blue grama grass, Bouteloua

    gracilis (H.B.K.) Lag. ex Griffiths, according to predictions of the plant stress

    hypothesis. B. gracilis is a dominant C4 grass species in western North

    American (USA) grasslands. Two primary predictions of the plant stress

    hypothesis were examined in the short grass B. gracilis experiencing naturally

    occurring and variable abiotic conditions: (1) reduced water or soil nitrogen

    levels coupled to insect herbivory will negatively affect plant growth and

    increase the palatability of tissues to insect herbivores, (2) chewing insect

    herbivores will perform better on stressed host plants with higher concentrations

    of primary nutrients (protein and carbohydrate). In addition, we examined the

    relative contribution to responses of stresses when combined under field

    conditions. We examined direct effects and interactions among three common

    forms of stress to B. gracilis: water availability, plant nutrient availability, and

    grasshopper herbivory within natural levels in the field. Experiments repeated

    over 3 years included a wide range of weather conditions against which to

    gauge plant responses. We expected that the imposition of moderate water or

    nutrient stress should modify plant physiology in such a way that resistance to

    herbivores decreases, with a concomitant increase in availability of primary

    nutrients in leaves to herbivores. As food plant palatability increases following

    moderate stress to B. gracilis, performance by the grass-feeding grasshoppers

    Ageneotettix deorum (Scudder) and Phoetaliotes nebrascensis Thomas should

    be enhanced as levels of primary nutrients in leaf tissues, especially protein and

    carbohydrates, increase. B. gracilis does not produce allelochemicals that are

    expected to influence responses to primary nutrients by herbivores in this

    experiment (Mole and Joern, 1994), allowing us to restrict our attention to the

    nutritional component of the problem.

    METHODS AND MATERIALS

    Study System. We conducted field experiments at Arapaho Prairie (Arthur

    County, NE, USA), a protected research site in Nebraska sandhills grassland.

    The site is characterized by upland sandhills grassland composed of large

    stabilized sand dunes with steep upper ridges that gradually slope into broad flat

    2071PLANT STRESS HYPOTHESIS

  • valleys. Most plants at Arapaho Prairie experience at least some water and

    nutrient stress in most years (Barnes, 1985; Mole et al., 1994).

    Vegetation at Arapaho Prairie is an open-canopy mixed-prairie, modified by

    sandy substrate (Barnes, 1985). Grasses contribute 80% to total plant biomass,

    with long-term NAPP ranging between 75 and 250 g mj2 (unpublished data). C3and C4 grass species typical of eastern tallgrass prairie and western shortgrass

    steppe grasslands intermingle at the site. Dominant plants in this sand dune land-

    scape form loose but recognizable vegetation associations along the existing

    topographic gradient (Barnes, 1985). The grass canopy is intermingled with ex-

    tensive bare ground, largely because of extensive disturbance from pocket gophers.

    Long-term annual mean precipitation (1951Y1980) recorded 15 km fromArapaho Prairie at Arthur County, NE, averaged 47.1 cm (SD = 8.98 cm) from

    FIG. 1. Precipitation patterns at Arapaho Prairie. (a) Annual rainfall with mean and 95%

    confidence intervals, 1987Y2000. (b) Seasonal pattern of precipitation illustrated bycumulative amount by date for the 3 years of the study.

    2072 JOERN AND MOLE

  • US Weather Bureau records; the recent 14-year record from Arapaho Prairie

    (1987Y2000) averaged 37.3 cm (SD = 11.4 cm). The amount and timing ofprecipitation at Arapaho Prairie varies greatly among years (Figure 1). Below-

    average precipitation was observed in two of the three years of this study

    (Figure 1a), with rainfall in 1990 equaling the average amount for the site.

    Perhaps more importantly, the seasonal timing of rainfall over the growing

    season differs in important ways among years (Figure 1b). Both 1989 and 1991

    received approximately the same amount of precipitation, but rain fell early in

    the season in 1991 compared with late-season rainfall in 1989. In 1990, rainfall

    occurred throughout the growing season, compared with 1989 and 1991, each of

    which experienced large periods without significant amounts of rain.

    Arapaho Prairie soils contain 80Y85% sand with low nutrient concen-trations (Barnes et al., 1984). Total nitrogen in soil in the top 10 cm ranges from

    0.02 to 0.07% of total soil weight according to landscape position. Valleys

    exhibit the highest soil total N levels, but all landscape positions are generally

    low (Alward and Joern, 1993). Nitrate concentrations range from 0.04 to 15

    ppm, and ammonium concentrations varied from 0.17 to 3.3 ppm. Light is

    seldom a major limitation to plant growth because of the open canopy and large

    proportion of sunny days at this site.

    B. gracilis is an often dominant C4 short-grass species throughout the

    shortgrass steppe of the Rocky Mountain foothills to the mixed-grass prairies of

    the central Great Plains of North America. In Nebraska sandhills grasslands, it

    is commonly found in fine-textured soils typical of dry valleys. At Arapaho

    Prairie, B. gracilis comprises up to 20Y30% of the relative cover of valleys andmidslope dunes but is nearly absent from dune ridges (Barnes et al., 1984). B.

    gracilis productivity is correlated with soil moisture, and biomass peaks in early

    August although yearly variability exists. B. gracilis is an important dietary

    component of graminivorous grasshopper species at this site, including A.

    deorum and P. nebrascensis (Joern, 1985).

    Experimental Design and Statistical Analyses. Overall, two related experi-

    ments were run concurrently, one addressing effects of water, N fertilizer, and

    grasshopper herbivory on plant response, and the other investigating grasshop-

    per performance in response to water and N-fertilizer treatments on plants.

    Rectangular cages (basal area 0.5 m2, 80 cm high) were constructed of 0.64-cm

    mesh and buried 10 cm after severing possible root connections to neighboring

    ramets. Cages were placed over natural stands of B. gracilis Bturf^ in earlyJune, corresponding to the initiation of growth. Cages housing treatment com-

    binations of both experiments were intermingled randomly within each block,

    but experiments were analyzed separately.

    Plant Responses. We manipulated levels of water, nitrogen fertilizer, and

    grasshopper herbivory within natural levels to understand variation in plant re-

    sponses to stress. Biomass accumulation and foliar chemical responses (% total

    2073PLANT STRESS HYPOTHESIS

  • nitrogen, TN; and % total nonstructural carbohydrates, TNC) by B. gracilis to

    multiple stresses was studied using a 3 2 2 full-factorial treatmentcombination (N fertilizer, water availability, and grasshopper herbivory,

    respectively) experiment in a randomized complete block design, nested within

    each of 3 years. Six sites (blocks) were arbitrarily selected in a range of natural

    habitats for B. gracilis along a gradient stretching from slope vegetation to

    valley vegetation. Sites were selected based on the criterion that a sufficient

    density of B. gracilis was available to set up a full set of treatment combi-

    nations. Treatment combinations were randomly assigned to predetermined

    patches of B. gracilis within each block.

    Grasshopper Performance. Grasshopper performance was evaluated in a

    field experiment executed in parallel with the plant stress experiment by using a

    similar experimental design and identical water and mineral-N fertilizer

    additions using cages as described above. Cages were intermingled randomly

    with those of the plant stress experiment. The experimental design was a 3 2full-factorial treatment combination experiment (N fertilizer and water

    availability, respectively) arrayed in a randomized complete block design,

    nested within each of 3 years. Six blocks were used. A repeated-measures

    analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine grasshopper survival.

    Responses of two grasshopper species to plant stress were evaluated in different

    years (1989, P. nebrascensis; 1990, A. deorum), but specific responses between

    species cannot be compared directly because of overall differences in naturally

    occurring stress between years. Ten fourth instar nymphs were added to each

    cage in late June or early July to match natural phenological development of

    each species in the field. The number of survivors and the developmental stage

    of individuals were determined every 2Y3 d from censuses of individualsremaining in each cage.

    Statistical Analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA,

    with treatments evaluated as fixed effects in the ANOVA. To normalize data,

    dependent variables expressed as percent of the total sample weight were

    transformed by applying arcsine(square root) to original data before statistical

    analyses. We present and discuss values in the nontransformed state. Treatment

    variables were treated categorically in analyses.

    Manipulations of Plant Stress from Water, Mineral Nitrogen, and Grasshopper

    Herbivory

    (1) Water. Two water levels were used: W+, in which water was added weekly

    for the 10-wk duration of the experiment, and W0, where no additional water

    beyond ambient rainfall was added. We considered W0 to be more stressful

    than W+ as water stress is common in grasses (Heinisch, 1981; Barnes, 1985).

    2074 JOERN AND MOLE

  • In the first 2 wk of the experiment, all plots received water in addition to N

    fertilizer if scheduled for that cage. After this, W+ cages received 2 l mj2

    wkj1 of supplemental water over the course of the experiment. No attempt

    was made to standardize the absolute level of plant water stress among years.

    (2) N-Fertilizer. Soil-nitrogen levels were manipulated using ammonium

    nitrate (NH4NO3). Levels included 0, 3, and 6 g N mj2 of N fertilizer

    (N0, N3, and N6 treatments, respectively). N fertilizer was applied in two

    half-strength additions over several days in early June in each year.

    (3) Grasshopper Herbivory. Moderate densities of the B. gracilis-feeding

    grasshopper, A. deorum, were added to cages to assess foliar responses to

    insect herbivory. In the GH+ treatment, we added four adult grasshoppers to

    each cage in late June. This density corresponded to eight individuals per

    square meter, about double the long-term average of all grasshoppers at

    Arapaho Prairie (A. Joern, unpublished data), but about half the economic

    threshold. Moreover, the densities used in the experiments are routinely

    observed in some vegetation patches in most years. No grasshoppers were

    added to cages in the GH0 treatment. Initiation of the grasshopper treatment

    corresponded to the phenological presence of the adult A. deorum in the

    field. Grasshoppers were replaced weekly to maintain relatively constant

    levels of herbivory.

    Final Biomass Estimates and Chemical Analyses of Leaf Material. Leaf

    samples of B. gracilis were collected at the end of the experiment (mid-August)

    and prepared for chemical analysis. Initially, a subsample of green leaf material

    [ca. 2Y3 g dry weight (d.w.)] was collected, immediately flash-frozen in liquidnitrogen in the field, and then prepared for chemical analyses. Samples were

    lyophilized for 48 hr and stored under desiccant in a freezer. Dried leaf material

    was ground with a Wiley Mill (40-mesh sieve) before chemical analysis. After

    collecting leaf material for chemical analyses, remaining plant biomass in a

    cage was clipped, dried (80-C for 24 hr) and weighed.Total Nitrogen. Total nitrogen was analyzed by using modified micro-

    Kjehldahl techniques (AOAC, 1984) with a standard digest on 100-mg samples

    of ground leaf material (2 ml H2SO4, a CuSeO4 Kjeltab catalyst tablet). Total N

    was determined by measuring ammonia generated after adding 100 ml of 5 M

    NaOH to the digest using a selective ion electrode (Orion). The ammonium

    probe was calibrated daily with an ammonium sulfate standard.

    Total Nonstructural Carbohydrates. Total nonstructural carbohydrates

    were extracted following the method of (Smith, 1981) except for the use of

    amylglucosidase (Sigma A-7255) as the enzyme preparation in the digest. These

    were analyzed by the titrimetric method of Smith (1981) with glucose as a stan-

    dard without the hydrolysis of sucrose. Sucrose averaged about 0.4Y0.5% d.w.

    2075PLANT STRESS HYPOTHESIS

  • of plant material compared with 17Y22% d.w. plant material for TNC asmeasured and did not vary with TNC concentration (S. Mole, unpublished data).

    RESULTS

    Total Plant Biomass. On average, total biomass in B. gracilis plots at the

    end of the season (Figure 2) was about 50Y100% greater in an average rainfall

    FIG. 2. End of season B. gracilis biomass (mean, SE) according to stress treatment

    conditions [water (W0, W+), N-fertilization (0, 3 and 6 g N mj2), and grasshopper

    herbivory (GH0, GH+)] for each year of the study.

    2076 JOERN AND MOLE

  • year (1990) as in dry years (1989, 1991), which were similar. B. gracilis

    biomass was significantly different among experimental treatments depending

    on the number of stresses applied, indicating that the plants in this study expe-

    rienced varying degrees of overall stress. Both water (1989: F1,56 = 17.4,

    P < 0.001; 1990: F1,56 = 6.6, P = 0.013; 1991: F1,56 = 11.3, P < 0.001) and N

    fertilizer additions (1989: F2,56 = 4.2, P < 0.021; 1990: F2,56 = 11.2, P < 0.001;

    1991: F2,56 = 7.1, P < 0.001) resulted in increased biomass in all years as

    additive, direct effects; no statistical interactions were detected for water and N

    fertilizer in any year (Figure 2).

    Feeding by grasshoppers reduced the final B. gracilis biomass in the dry

    years of 1989 and 1991 (67% in 1989, F1,56 = 34.8, P < 0.001; 32% in 1991,

    F1,56 = 6.5, P = 0.012), but no effect from grasshopper feeding was detected in

    1990, a year of normal rainfall. This indicates that complete compensation for

    foliage loss was observed in this year with normal rainfall. No statistical

    interactions among grasshopper herbivory, water availability, and N fertilizer

    treatments were observed in their combined effect on final B. gracilis biomass,

    but were additive instead. Although biomass estimates do not include the

    amounts consumed by grasshoppers, these should be similar between years as

    the grasshopper encounter rate was controlled.

    Foliar Total Nitrogen. Foliar TN differed significantly among treatments,

    year, and block (Figures 3a and 4a, Table 1). TN concentrations were highest

    for all treatments in 1989, the driest year, a year with almost no precipitation

    occurring early in the growing period (Figure 1b). TN at the end of the

    experiments in August 1989 averaged 1.73% total dry weight in all treatment

    combinations compared with 1.01% (1990) and 1.14% (1991) TN in subsequent

    years, representing a notable decrease in 1990Y1991 compared with 1989.Foliar TN levels varied in response to both N fertilizer and water treatments

    in some fashion in all years (Figures 3a and 4a, Table 1), with water addition

    explaining the most variation in responses (Figure 5). Depending on the year, N

    fertilizer addition increased foliar TN levels from 5 to 21% dry mass compared

    with no fertilizer addition treatments. An average 13% increase in foliar TN over

    the 3-year period was observed. Differences in foliar TN between 3N vs 6N

    treatments were of smaller magnitude (3Y10%), and only significantly differentin 1991.

    Although the main effects of treatments were pronounced in all cases

    (Figure 3), treatment interactions that were important and insightful to

    underlying processes were sometimes detected. W0 treatments resulted in a

    10Y20% higher level of total foliar-N compared with W+ treatments. Theweakest response to water (9.5%) was observed in the driest year (1989),

    possibly because extreme drought stress in that year was not proportionally

    offset by the water addition treatment compared to other years. A significant N

    fertilizer by water interaction existed in 1989 and 1990 but with different

    2077PLANT STRESS HYPOTHESIS

  • responses between the 2 years (Figure 5). In very dry 1989, higher foliar TN

    levels were seen in W0 only for the N0 treatment. No differences were seen

    between W0 and W+ for the N3 and N6 fertilization treatment levels. In a year

    of average rainfall (1990), there was no difference in foliar TN between water

    treatments at N0, but significant and about equal increases in total N for N3 and

    N6 treatments in interaction with water availability.

    Grasshopper herbivory affected foliar TN levels significantly as a main

    effect only in 1991. However, grasshopper feeding interacted with other treat-

    ments to influence total foliar TN in all years (Figures 4a and 5). In 1989, there

    was an increase in TN up to the maximum level observed at N3, a TN level that

    was reached with N6 with no grasshoppers. In 1990, grasshopper herbivory

    interacting with water availability led to higher TN level that was reached in the

    FIG. 3. Responses (mean, SE) in (a) % total N and (b) % TNC to main treatments (water

    addition, grasshopper herbivory, and N fertilizer) for each year.

    2078 JOERN AND MOLE

  • W0 treatment compared with the W+ treatment for which there was no

    significant difference between grasshopper treatments.

    Foliar Total Nonstructural Carbohydrates. Significant responses in foliar

    TNC concentrations were also observed (Table 1, Figures 3b, 5b, and 6) in

    response to combined stresses. Among-year differences averaged 5Y10%, with1989 exhibiting the highest foliar TNC levels. Differences in responses among

    all treatment combinations showed little variation in 1989 and 1991 compared

    FIG. 4. Percentage of total variance in foliar nutrient responses explained by experi-

    mental treatments in each year of study. (a) % Total foliar nitrogen (TN) and (b) % total

    nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC). Letters refer to main effects (N, nitrogen fertili-

    zation; W, water; G, grasshopper herbivory) and statistical interactions (N*W, N*G,

    W*G) as indicated in the experimental design of Table 1. B is the block (site) effect.

    Percentage of total variance in response was calculated as the variance associated with

    the treatment combination compared with the total variance of the experiment.

    2079PLANT STRESS HYPOTHESIS

  • t1.1

    TA

    BL

    E1

    .A

    NO

    VA

    OF

    FO

    LIA

    RN

    UT

    RIE

    NT

    RE

    SP

    ON

    SE

    SO

    FB

    .g

    raci

    lis

    LE

    AF

    TIS

    SU

    EA

    TT

    HE

    EN

    DO

    FT

    HE

    SE

    AS

    ON

    IN

    RE

    SP

    ON

    SE

    TO

    MU

    LT

    IPL

    ES

    TR

    ES

    SE

    S

    So

    urc

    e

    All

    yea

    rs1

    98

    91

    99

    01

    99

    1t1.2

    df

    FP

    df

    FP

    FP

    FP

    t1.3

    Fo

    lia

    rT

    N(G

    N/G

    lea

    fd

    ryw

    eig

    ht)

    t1.4

    Mo

    del

    R2

    57

    .36

    8.7

    61

    .06

    1.5

    t1.5

    Yea

    r2

    14

    2.8

    0.0

    01

    YY

    YY

    YY

    Yt1.6

    Blo

    ck5

    4.2

    0.0

    01

    57

    .40

    .001

    5.4

    0.0

    01

    2.2

    0.0

    7t1.7

    N-F

    erti

    lize

    r2

    10

    .90

    .001

    26

    .80

    .002

    4.9

    0.0

    18

    .30

    .001

    t1.8

    Wat

    er1

    17

    .10

    .001

    11

    4.9

    0.0

    01

    18

    .50

    .00

    11

    4.0

    0.0

    01

    t1.9

    Gra

    ssh

    opp

    er1

    15

    .70

    .001

    10

    .01

    0.9

    1.3

    0.2

    65

    .90

    .02

    t1.10

    N-F

    erti

    lize

    r

    Wat

    er2

    0.6

    0.4

    52

    4.5

    0.0

    26

    .20

    .00

    43

    .10

    .05

    t1.11

    N-F

    erti

    lize

    r

    Gra

    ssh

    opp

    er2

    0.7

    0.5

    62

    5.4

    0.0

    07

    2.6

    0.0

    90

    .20

    .82

    t1.12

    Wat

    er

    Gra

    ssh

    opp

    er1

    3.4

    50

    .03

    13

    .80

    .05

    4.9

    0.0

    30

    .90

    .34

    t1.13

    N-F

    erti

    lize

    r

    Wat

    er

    Gra

    ssh

    op

    per

    21

    .97

    0.1

    02

    1.7

    0.1

    82

    .90

    .06

    5.0

    0.0

    1t1.14

    Err

    or

    19

    75

    5t1.15

    t1.16

    TN

    Cs

    (gT

    NC

    /gle

    af

    dry

    wei

    gh

    t)t1.17

    Mo

    del

    R2

    39

    .83

    7.5

    91

    .66

    6.0

    t1.18

    Yea

    r2

    25

    .80

    .001

    YY

    YY

    YY

    Yt1.19

    Blo

    ck5

    0.6

    0.9

    50

    .80

    .63

    .10

    .02

    2.9

    0.0

    2t1.20

    N-F

    erti

    lize

    r2

    9.8

    0.0

    01

    27

    .30

    .002

    7.9

    0.0

    01

    20

    .80

    .001

    t1.21

    Wat

    er1

    2.9

    0.0

    91

    4.8

    0.0

    30

    .02

    0.8

    96

    .80

    .0t1.22

    Gra

    ssh

    opp

    er1

    29

    .40

    .001

    11

    .00

    .34

    42

    .00

    .00

    10

    .02

    0.8

    9t1.23

    N-F

    erti

    lize

    r

    Wat

    er2

    0.8

    0.5

    20

    .10

    .92

    1.3

    0.0

    01

    2.2

    0.1

    3t1.24

    N-F

    erti

    lize

    r

    Gra

    ssh

    opp

    er2

    1.0

    0.3

    52

    2.6

    0.0

    92

    1.5

    0.0

    01

    4.0

    0.0

    2t1.25

    Wat

    er

    Gra

    ssh

    opp

    er1

    0.0

    60

    .81

    0.1

    0.8

    11

    .60

    .00

    11

    6.3

    0.0

    01

    t1.26

    N-F

    erti

    lize

    r

    Wat

    er

    Gra

    ssh

    op

    per

    20

    .94

    0.3

    92

    2.2

    0.1

    21

    8.0

    0.0

    01

    7.5

    0.0

    01

    t1.27

    Err

    or

    19

    75

    5t1.28

    2080 JOERN AND MOLE

  • with 1990. Total variance in TNC levels among treatments was 1.5Y5 timesgreater in the average rainfall year (1990) than in the other years. Over all 3 years,

    combined nitrogen fertilizer and grasshopper treatments for all levels were sig-

    nificant as main effects, with no significant statistical interactions. When com-

    pared against the N fertilizer treatments, W0/GH0 had the lowest TNC levels and

    W+/GH+ had the highest levels on average, with each decreasing along the

    N-fertilization axis. Levels of TN and TNC in leaves were uncorrelated in

    all years for all treatments combined (1989: r2 = 0.014; 1990: r2 = 0.001;

    1991: r2 = 0.038; P > 0.05 for all years). However, when years were analyzed

    separately, interesting differences were observed.

    In general, TNC declined 4Y6.5% with increased N fertilizer in all years,although no significant differences were observed between the 3 g and 6 g

    FIG. 5. Responses of significant interactions among treatments for % total foliar N (TN)

    for each year of study.

    2081PLANT STRESS HYPOTHESIS

  • N fertilizer treatments. When water treatments were significant (1989 and

    1991), TNC was greater in W+ compared with the W0 treatments, with

    differences on the order of about 3Y4%. Generally, grasshopper herbivory was afactor when interacting with either N fertilizer or water treatments (Table 1). In

    1990, GH+ resulted in a large 23% increase in % foliar TNC, and important

    interactions with N fertilizer and water were detected.

    The nature of interactions among sources of plant stress differed among

    years. Numerous interactions were observed in both 1990 and 1991 (Figure 6),

    average and below average rainfall years, respectively. In 1990, all two-way

    interactions and a three-way interaction were significant. % TNC in the N6fertilizer treatment increased in the W0 treatment, but the trend otherwise was

    for TNC to drop with increased N fertilizer. Grasshopper treatments interacted

    with both N fertilizer and water in both 1990 and 1991, but the TNC responses

    were different. In the very dry 1989, no interactions were detected, and all

    contributions to the variance in TNC content were additive. Inclusion of

    grasshoppers resulted in increased TNC in high-resource environments (N or

    FIG. 6. Responses of significant interactions among treatments for % total nonstructural

    carbohydrate (TNC) for each year of study.

    2082 JOERN AND MOLE

  • water) compared with the GH0 treatments. In 1991, the opposite response was

    observed where TNC levels under high-resource conditions were lower if

    grasshoppers were present.

    Grasshopper Performance. P. nebrascensis. This species was studied in a

    very dry year with late season rainfall. No significant effect of treatment

    combinations was observed for developmental rate although there is a suggestion

    that W0/6N develops faster. Repeated-measures ANOVA of the number of

    FIG. 7. Mean survival of two grasshoppers in response to plant stress treatments.

    Experiments were performed in different years as described in the text. Data are trans-

    formed as natural log of number alive at each census period.

    2083PLANT STRESS HYPOTHESIS

  • individuals remaining in cages of P. nebrascensis (Figure 7a) was significant

    (Wilks l = 0.10, P < 0.001). However, although observed trends in survivalmay be suggestive, no significant effect of water and N fertilizer treatments

    were detected. The significant difference in the repeated-measures ANOVA re-

    flected the decrease in the number of survivors over time, not treatments.

    Ageneotettix deorum. This species was studied in a normal rainfall year.

    No significant effect of water and N fertilizer treatments on developmental rate

    was detected. A. deorum survival (Figure 7b) varied in response to experimental

    treatments (repeated-measures ANOVA, Wilks l = 0.137, F6,21 = 22.06, P /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 150 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 600 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org?) /PDFXTrapped /False

    /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 /Description >>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice