2005 math releaseditems
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
1/97
2005 CSAP Released Items and Scoring Information
Grades 3 and 4 Mathematics
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
2/97
This page is left intentionally blank.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
3/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
3
Table of Contents
PagesReleased Item Scoring Packet Overview 4
4-Point Rubric: Extended Constructed Response 5
3-Point Rubric: Medium Constructed Response 6
2-Point Rubric: Short Constructed Response 7
Released Item #19 3rd Grade (shared with 4th) 9
Released Item #14 3rd Grade (shared with 4th) 11
Released Item #24 3rd Grade (shared with 4th) 21
Released Item #25 3rd Grade 33
Released Item #40 3rd Grade 35
Released Item #23 4th Grade 47
Released Item #31 4th Grade 77
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
4/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Overview
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
4
2005 Mathematics Released Item Scoring Packet
The 2005 Mathematics Released Item Scoring Packet begins with the general holistic
rubrics which are guides in developing the specifics for each items scoring. Sincethese same general rubrics are used for all items at all levels, they appear only once atthe beginning of the packet.
Each Released Item includes:1. A blank form of the item2. Item Exemplary Response and Information Sheet3. SIR Form4. Anchor Papers5. Discussion Papers6. Scoring Annotation Sheet
Item Exemplary Response and Information Sheet:The exemplary response givenonly presents one or at most two examples of a response that would receive fullcredit. It does not imply that the method(s) shown is either the best method ofsolution or the one that is most often used by students. You will notice that eachpart includes the note, OR - Other valid response (process, explanation,method). This means that any method that is both mathematically valid andleads to a correct answer will be given full credit.
SIR (Scoring Issues Resolution) Form: A SIR form is created for each constructedresponse item on a math CSAP test. It characterizes more fully what
requirements a student paper must contain to be given a particular score.
Anchor Papers: One characteristic student paper is selected for each possible scorepoint for an item. These papers are used as a reference throughout the scoringprocess.
Discussion Papers: These are student papers that dont always fit neatly into one ofthe scoring categories. Colorado teachers work with the Scoring Supervisors forCTB to resolve these issues prior to the start of scoring. These resolutions arecompiled and summarized on the SIR form.
Scoring Annotation Sheet: This sheet indicates why each of the discussion papersincluded in the packet was given the score it received.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
5/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS 4-Point Rubric Extended Constructed-Response Items
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
5
Colorado Department of EducationUnit of Student Assessment
4 - Point Rubric for Extended Constructed-Response Items
This rubric is used to score students' responses to extended constructed-response items. These items require thestudent to use problem-solving skills that may require the construction of a graph or a model, the extension of apattern, or the use of geometric relationships and spatial reasoning. These items may also include an explanationof reasoning, evaluation of methods, or application to real-world situations.
There are several extended constructed-response items in CSAP, each taking approximately 15 minutes tocomplete. Each extended constructed-response item receives a single score of 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 points.
4 Points
The response accomplishes the prompted purpose and effectively communicates the student's mathematicalunderstanding. The student's strategy and execution meet the content (including concepts, technique,representations, and connections), thinking processes and qualitative demands of the task. Minor omissions mayexist, but do not detract from the correctness of the response.
3 Points
The response provides adequate evidence of the learning and strategic tools necessary to complete the promptedpurpose. It may contain overlooked issues, misleading assumptions, and/or errors in execution. Evidence in the
response demonstrates that the student can revise the work to accomplish the task with the help of writtenfeedback. The student does not need a dialogue or additional instructions.
2 Points
The response partially completes the task, but lacks adequate evidence of the learning and strategic tools that areneeded to accomplish the prompted purpose. It is not clear that the student is ready to revise the work withoutmore instruction.
1 Point
The response demonstrates some evidence of mathematical knowledge that is appropriate to the intent of theprompted purpose. An effort was made to accomplish the task, but with little success. Minimal evidence in theresponse demonstrates that with instruction the student can revise the work to accomplish the task.
0 Points
The response lacks any evidence of mathematical knowledge that is appropriate to the intent of the task.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
6/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS 3-Point Rubric Medium Constructed-Response Items
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
6
Colorado Department of EducationUnit of Student Assessment
3 - Point Rubric for Medium Constructed-Response Items
This rubric is used to score students' responses to medium constructed-response items. Theseitems require the student to use problem-solving skills that may require the construction of a graph ora model, the extension of a pattern, or the use of geometric relationships and spatial reasoning.
These items may also include an explanation of reasoning, evaluation of methods, or application toreal-world situations.
There are several medium constructed-response items in CSAP, each taking approximately 10minutes to complete. Each extended constructed-response item receives a single score of 0, 1, 2, or3 points.
3 Points
The response accomplishes the prompted purpose and effectively communicates the student'smathematical understanding. The student's strategy and execution meet the content (includingconcepts, technique, representations, and connections), thinking processes and qualitative demandsof the task. Minor omissions may exist, but do not detract from the correctness of the response.
2 Points
The response demonstrates adequate evidence of the learning and strategic tools necessary tocomplete the prompted purpose. It may contain overlooked issues, misleading assumptions, and/orerrors in execution. Evidence in the response demonstrates that the student can revise the work toaccomplish the task with the help of written feedback or dialogue.
1 Point
The response demonstrates some evidence of mathematical knowledge that is appropriate to theintent of the prompted purpose. An effort was made to accomplish the task, but with little success.Evidence in the response demonstrates that with instruction the student can revise the work toaccomplish the task.
0 Points
The response lacks any evidence of mathematical knowledge that is appropriate to the intent ofthe task.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
7/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS 1-Point Rubric Extended Constructed-Response Items
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
7
Colorado Department of EducationUnit of Student Assessment
2 - Point Rubric for Short Constructed-Response Items
This rubric is used to score students' responses to short constructed-response items. These itemsrequire the students to use problem-solving skills as they apply to all of the Colorado Model ContentStandards for mathematics. An item may ask the student to include and communicate reasoningusing words and /or numbers, evaluate an answer, or demonstrate the process used to determine ananswer.
There are several short constructed-response items in CSAP, each taking approximately 3 to 5minutes to complete. Each short constructed-response item receives a single score of 0, 1,or 2points.
2 Points
The response accomplishes the prompted purpose and effectively communicates the student'smathematical understanding. The student's strategy and execution meet the content (includingconcepts, technique, representations, and connections), thinking processes, and qualitative demandsof the task. Minor omissions may exist, but do not detract from the correctness of the response.
1 Point
The response partially accomplishes the prompted purpose. The student's strategy and executionlack adequate evidence of the learning and strategic tools that are needed to accomplish the task.
The response may show some effort to accomplish the task, but with little success. It is clear that thestudent requires additional feedback and/or instruction from the teacher in order to accomplish thetask.
0 Points
The response lacks evidence of mathematical knowledge that is appropriate to the intent of the task.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
8/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
8
This page is left intentionally blank.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
9/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 19 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
9
Study the In-Out machine below.
What rule is used for the In-Out machine?
o double the numbero add 10
o add 15o subtract 10
19
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
10/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 19: Exemplary Response Information 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
10
Study the In-Out machine below.
What rule is used for the In-Out machine?
o double the numbero add 10o add 15
o subtract 10
Score Points: 1 point item (multiple choice)
This item appeared at two adjacent grade levels (3 and 4).
Grade 3
Assessment Objective: 2.3a Patterns, Functions and AlgebraSubcontent Area: not classified
Grade 4Assessment Objective: 2.3a Patterns, Functions and AlgebraSubcontent Area: not classified
19
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
11/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 14 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
11
The bar graph below shows the number of cupcakes J osh sold on Mondayand Wednesday.
Use the information below to find the number of cupcakes J osh sold.
On Tuesday, J osh sold 2 fewer cupcakes than on Monday.
On Thursday, J osh sold twice as many cupcakes as on Wednesday.
On Friday, J osh sold 4 more cupcakes than on Monday.
On the graph, draw the bars for Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
12/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 14: Exemplary Response Information 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
12
SESSION 1 Item 14
Exemplary Response
Score Points: Apply 2-point holistic rubric
This item appeared at two adjacent grade levels (3 and 4).
Grade 3Assessment Objective: 3.1a Data, Probability and StatisticsSubcontent Area: not classified
Grade 4Assessment Objective: 3.1a Data, Probability and StatisticsSubcontent Area: not classified
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
13/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 14: SIR Form 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
13
Scoring Issues Resolution (SIR)Guide for Scorers
Math Grade __3___ Item # __14___ Point Value __2___Shared Grade (4) Item # 15 .
What is the specific content being measured by this item?
Assessment Objective 3.1a - Interpreting and creating bar graphs
If one thinks of dividing the papers into "Upper Tier Papers" and "Lower TierPapers," what is the most important feature that would be present in upper tierpapers but not in lower tier papers?
Students can make an accurate interpretation of a bar graph and representresults on the same scale most of the time.
For this item, characterize the requirements for each of the possib le score levels:
0 point paperResponse has none of the requested bars drawn correctly.
1 point paperResponse has at least one of the bars clearly correctly drawn.
2 point paperResponse has all three bars are correctly drawn.
In light of the student work considered on this item, what instructionalinformation could you share with teachers?
9 Be sure to pay attention to the measurements on a scale.
9 Be sure students understand the meaning of twice as many.
9 Advise students to carefully draw the graph lines so it is clear what number
they represent.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
14/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 14: 2 Point Anchor 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
14
2 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 14 Shared at Grade 4Score: 2
The response accomplishes the task and
effectively communicates the studentsmathematical understanding.
All three bars are drawn to the correct value.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
15/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 14: 1 Point Anchor 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
15
1 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 14 Shared at Grade 4Score: 1
The response partially accomplishes the
prompted purpose.
Two of the bars go to the correct value, but thethird does not.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
16/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 14: 0 Point Anchor 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
16
0 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 14 Shared at Grade 4Score: 0
The response lacks evidence of mathematicalknowledge that is appropriate to the intent ofthe task.
All three bars are drawn to the wrong values.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
17/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 14: Discussion Paper #1 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
17
Discussion Paper #1
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
18/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 14: Discussion Paper #4 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
18
Discussion Paper #2
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
19/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 14: Discussion Paper Guide 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
19
2005 Mathematics Released ItemDiscussion Paper Annotations
Response Score
Grade Item # ID Given Annotations
3/4 14 #1 2The student has drawn the bars very close to the correct values.The small difference is considered a minor omission.
3/4 14 #2 0The student has drawn two of the bars to precise, but incorrectvalues. The third clearly is drawn below the correct line leavingno evidence of an interpretation that leads to a correct value.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
20/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
20
This page is left intentionally blank
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
21/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
21
The candy bar shown below is divided into 4 equal parts.
Part A Shade 1 part of the candy bar.
On the line below, write a fraction to show the amount of candy bar thatyou did not shade.
fraction _________
Part B Shade of the candy bar shown below.
On the line below, write a fraction to show the amount of the candy bar thatyou did not shade.
fraction _________
2
4
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
22/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: Exemplary Response Information 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
22
Session 2 Item 24
Exemplary Responses
Part A
fraction
OR Other valid response
Part B
fraction
OR
fraction
OR
Other valid response
Score Points: Apply 2-point holistic rubricThis item appeared at two adjacent grade levels (3 and 4).
Grade 3Assessment Objective: 6.2a Operations and CalculationsSubcontent Area: not classified
Grade 4Assessment Objective: 6.2a Operations and CalculationsSubcontent Area: not classified
2
4
1
2
3
4
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
23/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: SIR Form 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
23
Scoring Issues Resolution (SIR)Guide for Scorers
Math Grade __3___ Item # __24___ Point Value __2___Shared Grade 4 Item # 27 .
What is the specific content being measured by this item?
Assessment Objective 6.2a Connecting visual representations of afraction with an equivalent symbolic representation.
If one thinks of dividing the papers into "Upper Tier Papers" and "Lower TierPapers" , what is the most important feature that would be present in upper tierpapers but not in lower tier papers?
Students show evidence that they can connect these two representations.
For this item, characterize the requirements for each of the possib le score levels.
0 point paper
Response has no indication that student can correctly connect equivalent visualand symbolic fractional representations.
1 point paper
Response shows some evidence that the above connections can be made, buthas not completed all correctly.
2 point paper
Response must have both visual and symbolic representations correct for bothparts.
In light of the student work considered on this item, what instructionalinformation could you share with teachers?
Teach students to read an item carefully and pay particular attention to theword not when found in a description.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
24/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: 2 Point Anchor 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
24
2 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 24 Shared at Grade 4Score: 2
The response accomplishes the task andeffectively communicates the students
mathematical understanding.
Both bars were correctly shaded and thecorrect symbolic representations were given.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
25/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: 1 Point Anchor 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
25
1 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 24 Shared at Grade 4Score: 1
The response demonstrates some evidence ofmathematical knowledge that is appropriate tothe intent of the task.
Both parts are shaded correctly, but thefraction requested in Part A does not matchwhat is requested by the item.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
26/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: 0 Point Anchor 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
26
0 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 24 Shared at Grade 4Score: 0
The response lacks evidence of mathematical
knowledge that is appropriate to the intent ofthe task.
In both parts, the fraction given does not matchthe fractional part shaded.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
27/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: Discussion Paper #1 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
27
Discussion Paper #1
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
28/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: Discussion Paper #2 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
28
Discussion Paper #2
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
29/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: Discussion Paper #3 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
29
Discussion Paper #3
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
30/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: Discussion Paper #4 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
30
Discussion Paper #4
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
31/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: Discussion Paper #5 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
31
Discussion Paper #5
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
32/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 24: Discussion Paper Guide 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
32
2005 Mathematics Released ItemDiscussion Paper Annotations
Response Score
Grade Item # ID Given Annotations
3 24 #1 2
The student has shaded the correct number of parts ineach candy bar. They have not totally shaded in the
parts, but enough has been shaded to make thestudents intent clear. The corresponding fractions are
correct.
3 24 #2 0The student has only one of the shadings done correctly,
but neither fraction matches the shading or the valuerequested.
3 24 #3 1
The student has shaded the first part correctly, but the
fraction requested in does not match what is requested
by the item. The second part shows no shading, but thefraction correctly matches the item request.
3 24 #4 1
The shading is correct in each part, meaning the student
has correctly connected the given fraction with thevisual. The student has not correctly written either
fraction.
3 24 #5 0
The shading between the two parts is inconsistent. Sincenone of the requested numbers given are fractions as
well, it is assumed the student does not understand thevisual representation - fraction connection.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
33/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 25 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
33
Which figure has no line of symmetry?
c c
c c
25
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
34/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 25: Exemplary Response Information 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
34
Which figure has no line of symmetry?
Score Points: 1 point item (multiple choice)
This item appeared at only one grade level.
Grade 3Assessment Objective: 4.1b Geometry and Spatial SenseSubcontent Area: not classified
c c
cc
25
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
35/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
35
Study the prices of the 4 toys shown below.
Part A Which three prices total $10.00? In the space below, show your work.
Part B What is the total price of all 4 toys? In the space below, show your workand write your answer on the line.
$ ___________________
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
36/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: Exemplary Response Information 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
36
Session 2 Item 40
Exemplary Response
Part A
$3.50, $4.25, and $2.25
AND
$3.50, $4.25, and $2.25 = $10.00
OR
Other Valid Response
Part B $13.75
AND
$3.75 + $10.00 = $13.75
OR
$3.50 + $4.25 + $2.25 + $3.75 = $13.75
OR
Other Valid Response
Score Points: Apply 3-point holistic rubric.
This item appeared at only one grade level.
Grade 3Assessment Objective 6.2b: Operations and CalculationsSubcontent Area: not classified
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
37/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: SIR Form 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
37
Scoring Issues Resolution (SIR)Guide for Scorers
Math Grade __3__ Item # __40__ Point Value __3__
What is the specific content being measured by this item?
Assessment Objective 6.2b - Using money notation to add decimal values.
If one thinks of dividing the papers into "Upper Tier Papers" and "Lower TierPapers," what is the most important feature that would be present in upper tierpapers but not in lower tier papers?
Students show two correct values (selections) or have one correct value withenough work that shows evidence the student understands how to add money
values.
For this item, characterize the requirements for each of the possib le score levels:
0 point paperResponse has no evidence that the student can successfully add money values.
1 point paperResponse shows that the student at least has some knowledge of how to addmoney values although it may be incomplete and lead to an incorrect solution.
2 point paperResponse shows the student understands how to complete the task but haseither erred in one of the tasks or not shown any work to confirm his/herknowledge related to the task.
3 point paperResponse shows two correct solutions and enough work to confirm the studentsknowledge related to the task.
In light of the student work considered on this item, what instructional
information could you share with teachers?
9 Teach students to show their work and to check their work.
9 Help students to clearly read and understand tasks.
9 Students need to understand how to add with regrouping.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
38/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: 3 Point Anchor 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
38
3 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 40Score: 3
The students responseaccomplishes the task and effectivelycommunicates the studentsmathematical understanding.
The student has the correct answerfor each part and has shown enoughwork to confirm the studentsknowledge related to the task.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
39/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: 2 Point Anchor 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
39
2 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 40Score: 2
The response provides adequateevidence of the learning necessary tocomplete the prompted task.
The student has the correct answerfor each part, but has not shownenough work to confirm the studentsknowledge related to the task.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
40/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: 1 Point Anchor 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
40
1 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 40Score: 1
The response demonstrates someevidence of mathematical knowledge thatis appropriate to the intent of the task.
Part A shows a correct answer withadequate work. Part B is a repeat ofPart A and adds no new information aboutthe students knowledge related to thetask.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
41/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: 0 Point Anchor 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
41
0 Point Anchor
CSAP Math 2005Grade 3 Item 40Score: 0
The response lacks evidence ofmathematical knowledge that isappropriate to the intent of the
task.
The student uses only the wholenumber portion of each price andgives no indication of knowledge ofadding decimal values.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
42/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: Discussion Paper #1 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
42
Discussion Paper #1
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
43/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: Discussion Paper #2 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
43
Discussion Paper #2
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
44/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: Discussion Paper #3 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
44
Discussion Paper #3
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
45/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: Discussion Paper #4 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
45
Discussion Paper #4
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
46/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 40: Discussion Paper Guide 3rd Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
46
2005 Mathematics Released ItemDiscussion Paper Annotations
Response Score
Grade Item # ID Given Annotations
3 40 #1 1
The student picks the three correct items adding theirprices to get an incorrect value. The work does show
some knowledge related to the task. Part B adds no newinformation.
3 40 #2 2The student completes Part A correctly, sets up Part Bcorrectly but has a mistake in the addition.
3 40 #3 0The student shows no evidence indicating why thenumbers written in Part A were selected. Part B showsno connection between the values given in the problem
and the student's solution.
3 40 #4 1In Part A the student gives some evidence of knowledge
of adding decimal values. The answer to Part B isincorrect and shows no process information.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
47/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
47
Mr. Burns has a jar with 178 jelly beans, as shown below.
Part A
Estimate the number of jelly beans that will be in the jar when it is halffull. In the space below, show how you found your estimate and write
your estimate on the line.
Estimate__________________jelly beans
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
48/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
48
Part B
Estimate the number of jelly beans that will be in the jar when it isfilled to the top. In the space below, show how you found yourestimate and write your estimate on the line.
Estimate__________________jelly beans
Part C
A small scoop holds 9 jelly beans.
Estimate the number of scoops that can be taken out of a full jar. Inthe space below, show how you found your estimate and write yourestimate on the line.
Estimate__________________ scoops
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
49/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Exemplary Response Information 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
49
SESSION 1 Item 23
Exemplary Response
Part A
Estimate 400 jelly beans
AND
The jar is about full with about 200 jelly beans, so half full is twice thatamount, or 400.
OR
Other valid explanation
Part B
Estimate 800 jelly beans
AND
If full is 400, then full to the top is 2 400 = 800
OR
If full is 200, then full to the top is 4 200 = 800
OR
Other valid response
Part C
Estimate 80 scoops
AND
A full jar contains about 800 jelly beans and one scoop holds about 10jelly beans. So, 800 jelly beans 10 jelly beans per scoop = 80 scoops.
OR
Other valid explanation
Score Points: Apply 4-point holistic rubric.This item appeared at only one grade level.
Grade 4Assessment Objective 1.5a: Number SenseSubcontent Area: number and operations sense
1
4
1
4
1
2
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
50/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: SIR Form 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
50
Scoring Issues Resolution (SIR)Guide for Scorers
Math Grade __4___ Item # __23___ Point Value __4___
What is the specific content being measured by this item?
Assessment Objective 1.5a - Using estimation strategies.
If one thinks of dividing the papers into "Upper Tier Papers" and "Lower TierPapers," what is the most important feature that would be present in upper tierpapers but not in lower tier papers?
Students with upper tier papers use estimation strategies to solve the probleminstead of straight computation.
For this item, characterize the requirements for each of the possib le score levels:
0 point paperResponse has at most one reasonable value with that value not being consistentwith the other two values. Response will often show only straight computation;however, it is either completed incorrectly or uses a non-appropriate operation.
1 point paperResponse may show straight computation with only one or two of the partscorrect. A paper that has only one part correct using estimation would also
receive 1 point.
2 point paperResponse may show straight computation, but all parts must be correct.Response may show a mix of straight computation and estimation with theestimate not being clearly reasonable.
3 point paperResponse must show some reasonable estimation. Response may contain anestimation that is not very reasonable or some straight computation to findvalues.
4 point paperResponse shows estimation to arrive at three reasonable estimated values.
Note: Responses are considered reasonable if they are determined by rounding 178to 170, 175, 180, or 200 and 9 to 10 in Part C.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
51/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: SIR Form (cont) 3rd / 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
51
In light of the student work considered on this item, what instructionalinformation could you share with teachers?
9 Teach estimation strategies such as rounding, front end adding, andfriendly numbers. An excellent way to do this is through NumberTalks
9 Students must realize that when asked to estimate, an exact answer isnot considered correct
9 It is critical for students to show their work and its connection to theiranswer.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
52/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 4 Point Anchor (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
52
4 Point Anchor (a)
CSAP Math 2005Grade 4 Item 23Score: 4
The response accomplishes the task andeffectively communicates the students
mathematical understanding.
The student uses estimation in Part A to findthe total number of jelly beans in a half full jarand then uses this estimation to completeParts B and C.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
53/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 4 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
53
4 Point Anchor (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
54/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 3 Point Anchor (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
54
3 Point Anchor (a)
CSAP Math 2005Grade 4 Item 23Score: 3
The response accomplishes much of the task.The work in Part B does not match the correctanswer given but this is viewed as anoversight.
Part C seems to lose track of what is beingestimated although the estimation process isfine.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
55/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 3 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
55
3 Point Anchor (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
56/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 2 Point Anchor 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
56
2 Point Anchor (a)
CSAP Math 2005Grade 4 Item 23Score: 2
The response provides adequate evidence ofthe learning and strategic tools necessary tocomplete the prompted task.
The student knows how to attack this problemcomputationally, but has given know evidenceof estimation skills.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
57/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 2 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
57
2 Point Anchor (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
58/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 1 Point Anchor (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
58
1 Point Anchor (a)
CSAP Math 2005Grade 4 Item 23Score: 1
The response demonstrates some evidence ofmathematical knowledge that is appropriate tothe intent of the task.
The student completed Parts A and B correctlybut with a complete absence of estimation.Part C the student chooses an operation that isinappropriate for the task.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
59/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 1 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
59
1 Point Anchor (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
60/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 0 Point Anchor (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
60
0 Point Anchor (a)
CSAP Math 2005Grade 4 Item 23Score: 0
The response lacks evidence of mathematicalknowledge that is appropriate to the intent ofthe task.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
61/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 0 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
61
0 Point Anchor (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
62/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #1 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
62
Discussion Paper #1 (a)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
63/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #1 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
63
Discussion Paper #1 (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
64/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #2 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
64
Discussion Paper #2 (a)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
65/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #2 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
65
Discussion Paper #2 (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
66/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #3 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
66
Discussion Paper #3 (a)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
67/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #3 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
67
Discussion Paper #3 (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
68/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #4 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
68
Discussion Paper #4 (a)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
69/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #4 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
69
Discussion Paper #4 (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
70/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #5 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
70
Discussion Paper #5 (a)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
71/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #5 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
71
Discussion Paper #5 (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
72/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #6 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
72
Discussion Paper #6 (a)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
73/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #6 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
73
Discussion Paper #6 (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
74/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #7 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
74
Discussion Paper #7 (a)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
75/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper #7 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
75
Discussion Paper #7 (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
76/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: Discussion Paper Guide 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
76
2005 Mathematics Released ItemDiscussion Paper Annotations
Response ScoreGrade Item # ID Given Annotations
4 23 #1 1Parts B & C show exact computational values not using anyestimation. It is not at all clear what is being attempted in PartA and its answer is not consistent with the other parts.
4 23 #2 3The response shows adequate evidence of the learningneeded to accomplish the task. But evidence of estimationskills is missing in Parts A & B.
4 23
#32
No work shown in Parts A & B, but the answer are consistentwith the use of exact computation. This is certainly the case
with Part C. The student knows how to attack this problemcomputationally, but has given no evidence of estimation skills.
4 23 #4 3
The response uses estimation to obtain a reasonable value forboth parts A & B. (The fact that 400 X 4 is given to lead to 800is considered a minor omission). Part C begins correctly butloses track of what are the estimated value mean in theproblem.
4 23 #5 3Parts A and B present a sound approach using estimation toproduce reasonable values. Part C shows the correctoperation but does not clearly lead to the submitted value.
4 23 #6 0This response shows no work that can confirm how the valueswere found. In addition the values are not consistent with eachother.
4 23 #7 1Part A shows a correct exact computation approach. Part Bcontains a conceptual error with doubling and part C uses anoperation inappropriate to the task.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
77/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
77
From your punch-out tools, use the ruler and the pattern blocks tohelp you solve this problem.
Brent traced around pattern blocks to make the polygon below.
Part A What is the perimeter of Brents polygon? On the line below, write youranswer:
__________ inches
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
78/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 23: 0 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
78
Part B Use the directions below to make another polygon.
Use two pattern blocks.
Use each pattern block only once.
Make a polygon with a perimeter of6 inches.
In the space below, trace around the 2 pattern blocks to show the polygon.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
79/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Exemplary Response Information 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
79
SESSION 1 Item 23
Exemplary Response
Part A
11 inches
Part B
OR
Other polygon using 2 pattern blocks that measure 6 inches.
Score Points: Apply 3-point holistic rubric.
This item appeared at only one grade level.
Grade 4Assessment Objective 5.3a: MeasurementSubcontent Area: measurement
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
80/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: SIR Form 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
80
Scoring Issues Resolution (SIR)Guide for Scorers
Math Grade __4__ Item # __31__ Point Value __3__
What is the specific content being measured by this item?
Assessment Objective 5.3a Measuring and determining the perimeter ofpolygons.
If one thinks of dividing the papers into "Upper Tier Papers" and "Lower TierPapers," what is the most important feature that would be present in upper tierpapers but not in lower tier papers?
Students can use criteria to correctly measure and create a polygon with a given
perimeter.
For this item, characterize the requirements for each of the possib le score levels:
0 point paperResponse has no parts that are correct with in the given range.
Note: In Part A, 10 through 12 is the given range; in Part B 5 through 7 is thegiven range.
1 point paper
Response shows a correct value for only one of the parts or both parts haveincorrect values within the given range.
2 point paperResponse shows a correct value for one of the parts while the other part eithercontains an incorrect value that is within the given range or contains an omissionsuch as not showing the two pattern blocks used.
3 point paperResponse has an answer of 11 for Part A and uses all the criteria correctly forPart B.
In light of the student work considered on this item, what instructionalinformation could you share with teachers?
When using pattern blocks with students, have them clearly recognize that allsides of the pattern blocks are the same length, except the long side of thetrapezoid which is twice the length of the others.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
81/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: 3 Point Anchor (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
81
3 Point Anchor (a)
CSAP Math 2005Grade 4 Item 31Score: 3
The students response accomplishes the taskand effectively communicates the studentsmathematical understanding.
The student has the correct answer of 11 for
Part A. For Part B, the student has correctlyuse the trapezoid and the triangle to trace apolygon with a perimeter of 6.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
82/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: 3 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
82
3 Point Anchor (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
83/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: 2 Point Anchor (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
83
2 Point Anchor (a)
CSAP Math 2005Grade 4 Item 31Score: 2
The response provides adequate evidence of the learningnecessary to complete the prompted task.
The student has the correct answer of 11 for Part A. In Part B,
the student failed to follow the instruction use each patternblock only once, but the resultant polygon does have aperimeter of 6. That provides evidence that the student couldrevise the work with the help of written feedback or dialog.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
84/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: 2 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
84
2 Point Anchor (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
85/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: 1 Point Anchor (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
85
1 Point Anchor (a)
CSAP Math 2005Grade 4 Item 31Score: 1
The response demonstrates some evidence ofmathematical knowledge that is appropriate to
the intent of the task.
Part A contains an incorrect value for theperimeter of the given figure. Part B does showa polygon with perimeter of 6, but it is not clearwhich pattern blocks were used to form it.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
86/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: 1 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
86
1 Point Anchor (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
87/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: 0 Point Anchor (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
87
0 Point Anchor (a)
CSAP Math 2005Grade 4 Item 31Score: 0
The response lacks evidence of mathematicalknowledge that is appropriate to the intent ofthe task.
Part A shows no attempt to find the perimeter.For Part B, the student uses two pattern blocks
joined to make a perimeter of 8 not 6 asrequested.
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
88/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: 0 Point Anchor (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
88
0 Point Anchor (b)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
89/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Discussion Paper #1 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
89
Discussion Paper #1 (a)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
90/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Discussion Paper #1 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
90
Discussion Paper #1 (b)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
91/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Discussion Paper #2 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
91
Discussion Paper #2 (a)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
92/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Discussion Paper #2 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
92
Discussion Paper #2 (b)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
93/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Discussion Paper #3 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
93
Discussion Paper #3 (a)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
94/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Discussion Paper #3 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
94
Discussion Paper #3 (b)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
95/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Discussion Paper #4 (a) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
95
Discussion Paper #4 (a)
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
96/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Discussion Paper #4 (b) 4th Grade
CSAP Mathematics Released Item Packet 2005 (May be reproduced)
96
Discussion Paper #4 (b)
Score: Scoring Rationale:
-
7/30/2019 2005 Math Releaseditems
97/97
CSAP MATHEMATICS Released Item 31: Discussion Paper Guide 4th Grade
2005 Mathematics Released ItemDiscussion Paper Annotations
Response Score
Grade Item # ID Given Annotations
4 31 #1 2
The student has a correct answer and work for Part A.In Part B the student uses the hexagon and triangle to
form a polygon of perimeter 6, except that is not theperimeter of the polygon which must be a closed figure.
4 31 #2 1
This student appears to know that perimeter is the sum
of the lengths of the sides although they are measuredincorrectly. Part B gives a polygon with a perimeter of 7
instead of 6.
4 31 #3 0There is no indication that the student knows what is
meant by polygon or perimeter, or that the student
knows how to use a ruler to measure lengths.
4 31 #4 3
In Part A this student has an incorrect answer of 10.
However, from the work, it is clear that the student hasmeasured correctly and knows the concept of perimeter.
The student merely forgot to measure one of the sides (a
minor omission).