2004 election fraud - full presentation 22 oct 05

8/14/2019 2004 Election Fraud - Full Presentation 22 Oct 05

1/108

1

THE 2004 ELECTIONS


2/108

2

PURPOSE

To share the TRUT H

To put a CLOSURE onthe issuesdiscussed


3/108

3

AGENDA

Following the Vote from Precinctto Proclamation of Winner

3. Fabrication of Election Results Before Elections

After Elections

Frustration of the Peoples Will

6. Filipinos Role in Putting a Closureto these Issues


4/108


5/108

5

Following the vote

City / Municipality

Precinct

Congress

Province

BY PRECINCT

BY MUNICIPALITY

Legend:ERs Election Returns

SOV Statement of Votes

COC Certificate of Canvass


6/108

6

Irregularities and Anomalies


7/108

serial number is stamped.

Both numbers should be printed at thesame time.

Page number is printed but


8/108

Serial numbers can be copied usingnumbering machines easily obtained from

bookstores. This highly irregular practice would render the ER not accountable.


9/108

9

NOTE: The Election Returns (ER) is the election

document closest to the ballot, not theCertificate of Canvass (COC).

The ER contains the tara which

corresponds to every vote read in full view of the voting public. The ER, therefore, reflects the true results

of the voting.


10/108

Page 1

of the ProvincialCertificate of

Canvass (COC) of Agusan del Norte

Page 2Page 3


11/108

Page 2 and Page 3 haveserial and pagenumbers with uniformgaps.

Page 1 is different.


12/108

Note how the serial number of Page 1 does not align with theother pages.


13/108

The operators switch

the altered COC page 1to change the results.

Page 1 shows the list

of candidates forPresident and Vice-President.


14/108

This practice of stamping serialnumbers was corrected for the 2001

elections. In 2004, it was back.


15/108

In the ERs, the tally of votes for eachcandidate is closed by the signing of names, and affixing of rightthumb marks by all three Board of Election Inspectors.


16/108

This ER is considered naked , thatis, there is no closure of entries asrequired by law.


17/108

This ER from Floridablanca,

Pampanga is an example of improper closure of tallies.

Imprints are neither thumbmarks nor human marks.


18/108

Are these humanthumbmarks?

Floridablanca


19/108

Compared to this

ER from San Juan,can you spot thedifferences?

San Juan Floridablanca


20/108

or a anca

Next, observe the taras.

Note how orderly the taras were written.

This can be done in the comfort of an air-conditioned room.

But not at midnight, inside a hot and crowded

precinct, by tired and sleepy teachers.


21/108

Floridablanca

Even more incredible, on the same day in Las Pinas,about 80 kilometers away, we see taras written inthe same penmanship of the person in Floridablanca,Pampanga!


22/108

The Color of the Pianistas

Comelec Resolution 6667 requires that each precinct be supplied

with two strips of thumbmark takers. The color of the ink on thestrips is grayish black.


23/108

23

Irregularities shown in

previous charts bolstersuspicions of fabricating andpadding election results to

favor GMA.


24/108

How was these done:

1. Identify the provinces where Mrs.Arroyorated well in surveys in order to makesubstantial vote padding in these areasappear credible.


25/108

Pulse Asia in November 2003 shows:

GMA received 39% support in the Visayas, and 15%,

her lowest, in Metro Manila.

Before the entry of FPJ in the presidential race, GMA registered highest support from the poorest E class with 29%. From ABC class, she got the lowest, 20%.


26/108

SWS Survey from September 2003 toMarch 2004 shows:

GMA received +44% satisfactory rating in the Visayas, and 11%, her lowest, in Metro Manila.


27/108

Four provinces were identified: Pampanga ,

Cebu , Iloilo and Bohol (PCIB Area).

PampangaPampanga

Bohol

CebuCebuIloilo


28/108

2. Inflate the number of expected registered voters from 38.8M to 43.5M to conceal votepadding.

Voter addition facilitates vote padding.

(1989) + 4,203,02449%32,141,07965,338,9891992

+ 6,924,665

+ 2,196,155

+ 2,475,170

- 2,978,961

+ 4,274,075

Increase / Decrease

48%38,807,518 81,357,4792004

Expected Registered Voters

54%43,536,028 81,357,479In the Project of Precincts

53%36,415,15468,616,5361995

47%36,611,36377,898,1842001

47%34,136,19373,130,9851998

%Registered

VotersTotal

Population Year


29/108

In Pampanga, the expected number of registered voters for 2004 was 944,092 .

But in the PCoC, the number of registered voters was padded to total 1,080,751 .

DagdagPlus

136,659


30/108

In the Province of Cebu, the expected number

of registered voters for 2004 was 1,299,612 .But in the PCoC, the number of registered voters was padded to total 1,780,708 .

Addition / Dagdag

481,096


31/108


32/108

In Iloilo, the expected number of

registered voters for 2004 was 787,580 .But in the PCoC, the number of registered voters was padded to total 923,262 .

Dagdag Plus135,682


33/108

In Iloilo City, the expected number of registered voters for 2004 was 191,620 .But in the PCoC, the number of registered voters was padded to total 240,153 .

Dagdag Plus48,533


34/108

In Bohol, the expected number of

registered voters for 2004 was 556,579 .

Dagdag

But in the PCoC, the number of registered voters was padded to total 619,139 .

Plus62,560


35/108

Thus, in Pampanga, Cebu, Iloilo and

Bohol, there was an increase of 951,695 registered voters.

9 5 1,6 9 5

Roughly the same number as the votesadded to GMA.


36/108

3. Over-print election result documents Election Returns ( ER ) for the precinct tallies

Statements of Votes ( SoV ) for the precinct andmunicipal breakdowns

Certificates of Canvass ( CoC ) for the municipal, city and provincial totals

to contain altered results and tosubstitute for documents withthe genuine results.


37/108

Several months before elections,Commissioner Resureccion Borraadmitted that the Comelec had over-printed election forms:

3 million ballots

33,000 election returns.


38/108

4. Pre-compute, in a separate operation, thedesired vote totals per precinct and recordin a tally master list. This list is used as aguide to tally the altered votes on the

over-printed ERs.

5. Certify the false ERs, after the votes are

tallied, using the master list of Board of Election Inspectors.


39/108

The master list of election inspectors

contains their names, precinctassignments and specimen signatures .

This list is used by master forgers as aguide for the ER certification.


40/108

6. Send the fabricated ERs, reflectinglandslides for GMA, to election officersand local operatives who had beeninstructed to switch the real precinctresults with the false returns.


41/108


42/108

42

3 x3,4409,692Cordova3 x1,6424,877Santander 4 x3,17711,903San Francisco4 x1,5405,957Santa Fe4 x18,36573,030Lapu-lapu City5 x8,79345,422Talisay 5 x

7443,912Tudela6 x4,65925,787Consolacion6 x14,63183,064Mandaue City6 x1,3988,505Madridejos7 x2,87721,153Barili7 x1,73212,906Compostela8 x1,76413,751Sibonga8 x2,37319,176San Fernando8 x3,53228,641Naga8 x3,87031,974Carcar 9 x2,95225,258Liloan9 x1,35911,870Badian9 x1,78215,639Carmen9 x5424,781Alcoy9 x5,00244,720Danao City 9 x

3,15628,976Minglanilla

9 x5,11447,318Toledo City10 x2,08419,813Daanbantayan10 x8919,251Aloguinsa11 x1,92720,463Dalaguete11 x4845,142Boljoon

7.84123,099965,570TOTAL

11 x4725,408Alcantara11 x7888,511Samboan

12 x1,57218,701Tuburan12 x1,59019,096Pinamungahan12 x6017,271Ronda12 x1,85622,510Balamban 12 x

4725,782Ginatilan13 x86610,846Borbon13 x1,21715,527Dumanjug13 x4235,426Pilar 13 x1,20315,610Medellin14 x4846,560Malabuyoc14 x6108,424Oslob14 x1,27318,231San Remegio15 x1,05115,264Asturias15 x70910,534Moalboal15 x1,77626,522Argao16 x84913,272Tabogon17 x70511,820Sogod17 x4898,309Tabuelan17 x5439,297Poro 18 x

1,33223,635Bantayan

18 x1,52327,134Bogo21 x4068,629Alegria22 x45910,270Catmon

GMA LeadOver FPJ FPJ

VotesGMA VotesMunicipality


43/108

People are asking:

If GMA was leading the race, why did she have to call Garci?


44/108

Because the unexpected

happened.

The fabricated votes in GMAs bailiwicks were not enough to cover the avalancheof votes for FPJ that came in from Luzon,including Metro Manila.


45/108

45

1,755,8377,232,3935,476,55674%18,162,07824,620,517LUZON75,158465,480540,63877%1,870,2322,431,5845

241,393478,234236,84175%895,0201,191,9304B

786,2101,756,485970,27574%4,087,0645,528,8984

404,3731,452,3891,048,01667%3,960,2835,925,347NCR

184,4821,592,6781,408,19676%3,747,9184,958,4253

76,260148,426224,68675%568,422762,268CAR

138,540501,088362,54875%1,121,2731,498,7802

152,257837,613685,35682%1,911,8662,323,2851

FPJ LeadGMA LeadFPJ

VotesGMAVotes%Total Votes

RegisteredVotersRegion

2,323,4931,768,5784,092,07175%6,729,4048,968,714VISAYAS

32,785670,000702,78574%1,546,7552,078,5558

1,405,114405,8321,810,94676%2,501,9993,297,9467

885,594692,7461,578,34075%2,680,6503,592,2136

567,656GMAs artificial lead

in Luzon and Visayas


46/108

Historically, the vote-rich Lingayen toLucena corridor elects a president .

This covers Pangasinan, Tarlac,Pampanga, Bulacan, Metro Manila,Rizal, Laguna, Cavite, Batangas andQuezon.


47/108

In other words, without the 951,695 votesadded to GMA in the PCIB area, GMA would be losing by 383,939 !!!

These figures only scratch the surface.

And this is why, GMA made at least 15

calls to Garci.

M 29 2004


48/108

48

GMA: HelloGarci.Garci: Hello, Maam, good morning

GMA: So, will I still lead by more than1 M overall ? ...Garci: Pipilitin ho natin yan ... GMA: Ah, ok, ok.

May 29, 2004

19 days AFTER election


49/108

Mrs. Arroyo called Garcillano 15 times

from May 26 to June 10, 2004.

The following graphs illustrate theresult of those calls.


50/108

LANAO DEL SUR

LA NA O DEL SU R


51/108

FPJ FPJ FPJGMA GMA GMA

81%

19%

56%

44%

25%

75%

183,724183,724 42,80342,803 67,98967,989 52,66352,663 42,80342,803 128,301128,301

226,120Total votes affected by DAGDAG BAWAS

LA NA O DEL SU R

ERs

FPJPM TALLY

ERs

NAMFREL TALLY

PCOC


52/108

Garci: Hello, maam. Good evening.GMA: Hello, tungkol dun sa Lanao del Sur at Basilan,

di raw nagma-match ang SoV sa CoC

Garci: Hindi na nag-match? May posibilidad na hindi mag-match kung hindi nila sinunod iyong individual SoV ngmga munisipyo Dun naman sa Basilan at Lanao del Sur, ito ho yungginawa nilang pataas sa inyo. Maayos na naman ang

paggawa eh.GMA: So nag-mamatch.

June 2, 2004

23 days AFTER elections

May 28 2004


53/108

May 28, 2004

Garci: Hello, good evening maam.GMA: The FPJ camp raw will file a case raw against the Board of

Canvassers and the military in Marawi?

Garci : Hindi naman ho siguro nila maa-ano yung ating Board of

Canvassers, pero ang military, kasi si Gudani , sa kanila siGudani. I do not know why they will file.

GMA: Oo, oo.

Garci : Sa kanila si Gudani maam. In fact thats why we have, I

have to work with Gen. Esperon and Gen. Kiamco na at thattime, pinalitan namin si Gudani for a while. Kaya kwan, pero bakit nila file-filan yang mga military na sakanila lahat. Halos ayaw na nga mag-give way sa amingmga tao.


Atty Jimmy Paz


54/108

Jim : Boss, nakatanggap ako ng certification ngayon ditogaling sa mga bata natin sa Lanao, nag failure nanaman pala dahil kay Gudani.

Garci : Oo nga eh. Jim : Putang-ina, sino ba yang Gudani, bakit ganun yun?

Garci : Yun ang pinaalis ko. Jim : Oo nga, bat andudoon na naman, papaano to?Garci : Oo nga, bumalik na naman. Kaya nga ayaw makialam

si First Gentleman dyan. Sabi ko nga, pinasabihan konga kay Ruben Reyes na paalisin na nyo yan.

Jim : Putang-ina, tarantado talaga to.Garci : Oo, pinaalis ko yan eh. Pero after three days after

elections, bumalik man dyan. Ang nag ( garbled ) dyansi Col. Pirino thru Gen. Esperon at tsaka si Gen.Kiamco.

June 8, 2004Atty. Jimmy PazChief of Staff of

ChairmanBenjamin Abalos 29 days AFTER elections


55/108

In support of Gen. Gudanis testimony:


56/108


57/108


58/108


59/108


60/108


61/108

BASILAN


62/108

Garci: Hello.GMA: Hello, did you get my text about the Tipo-Tipo?Garci: Oho, oho Maam kwan ho, thats what Im being

fearful about. Kung si Rashma Hali * yun,thats why were asking people to look for her.so that we can control her.

GMA: Shes probably already being held by them.Garci: Maam?GMA: Shes being held by them already.Garci: She is here, thats why if it is possible

we will ask her family to call her up fromZamboanga.

June 7, 2004



63/108

GMA: Hello, ano nahanap na ninyo?Garci: Maam?GMA: Ano nahanap na ninyo iyong sa Tipo-

tipo?Garci: Tipo-tipo, hindi pa. Ang inaano nila

ngayon kaya nga ...( line cut )

June 7, 2004

3 hours AFTER the first call

* HADJA RASHMA HALI Election Officer of Municipality of Tipo-Tipo, Basilan .

BASI LA N


64/108


88%

12%

58%

42%38%

62%

73,27473,274 10,19810,198 74,88474,884 53,49553,495 48,68548,685 79,70279,702

44,907

94,089

ERs to MCOC

ERs to PCOC

ERs MCOC PCOC

Total votes affected by

DAGDAG BAWAS


65/108

Garci: Hello, maam. Good evening.GMA: Hello, tungkol dun sa Lanao del Sur at Basilan,

di raw nagma-match ang SoV sa CoC

Garci: Hindi na nag-match? May posibilidad na hindi mag-match kung hindi nila sinunod iyong individual SoV ngmga munisipyo Dun naman sa Basilan at Lanao del Sur, ito ho yung ginawa nilang pagpataas sa inyo. Maayos na naman ang

paggawa eh.GMA: So nag-mamatch.

June 2, 2004

23 days AFTER election


66/108

Garci: Hello?Male: Padre, yun daw sa Basilan wala nang

nagbabantay pare. Pinabayaan na ngmga tao. Yun na lang ang natitira eh,Basilan.

Garci: May petition kasi for annulment dun.Male: Ah ganun.

Garci: Sumobra masyado.Male: Pwedeng ikarga mo naman yung70,000 pare ... (line cut )


June 3, 2004Male: believed tobe Mike Arroyo

June 3, 2004Male: believed to


67/108

Male: Padre, may pag-asa pa ba tayo?Sa Basilan pala pwede pa eh. Tsaka sa Isabela .

Garci: Oo.Male : Pero sitenta mil ang kailangan pare eh. 70,000 na

lang kailangan, hati-hatiin mo na lang yun.

Tig-kokonti lang yun. Ano na pare, patotohanin mo na.Wala nang pag-asa yan. Patotohanin mo na. Kung anona lang ang konsiderasyon sabihin mo na lang sa akinkung ano pang additional. Pare, pakisuyo lang, pakitapos

na lang para yun na lang aanuhin ko sa yo. Ha?Marami pang natitira, pwede pang idagdag eh ha?Garci: O sige, sige.Male : 70,000 lang ang kailangan pare.Garci: Ok sige.


June 3, 2004be Mike Arroyo

BASI LA N


68/108


88%

12%

58%

42%38%

62%

73,27473,274 10,19810,198 74,88474,884 53,49553,495 48,68548,685 79,70279,702

44,907

94,089

ERs to MCOC

ERs to PCOC

ERs MCOC PCOC

Total votes affected by

DAGDAG BAWAS

69,504


69/108

SULU

SULU


70/108


62%

38%44%

56%

44%

56%

96,62296,622 60,35760,357 60,80760,807 78,42978,429 60,80760,807 78,42978,429


ERs MCOC PCOC

May 27, 2004


71/108

y ,


GMA : Hello, meron tayong ... (?) ...E.R.? para sa Sulu?

Garci : Oo maam, meron po. GMA : Nagco-correspond ? Garci : Oo maam. Lahat ho meron, hindi

po namin ika-count kung ... GMA : Ok, ok.


72/108

TAWI-TAWI

May 26, 2004


73/108

y ,


GMA: Hello, Hello.Garci: Hello maam good morning po.GMA: Oo, oo. Si ano, si Biazon nagbabanta,

kung madadaya daw siya papabuksandaw niya yung sa ... at sa Tawi-tawi,

eh baka raw ako ang madale doon... Garci: Baka nga ho ... ( line faded, cut )

TAWI -TAWI


74/108

FPJ FPJGMA GMA

79%

21%

60%

40%

60,43660,436 16,63116,631 49,80349,803 33,63433,634

TAWI TAWI

ER PCOC



75/108

SULTAN KUDARAT

OLU MB IO, S ULT AN KUDA RA T


76/108


56%

44%

7%

93%

7%

93%

5,3765,376 4,0824,082 545545 7,1007,100 545545 7,1007,100

7,859DISCREPANCY

ER MCOC PSOV

ALA MA NSI G, SU LT AN K UD AR AT


77/108


78%

22%

79%

21% 10%

90%

8,1808,180 2,3092,309 8,5808,580 2,2202,220 1,0561,056 10,58010,580

15,395DISCREPANCY

ER MCOC PSOV

EB AK , SU LTA N K UDAR AT


78/108


73%

27%

73%

27%15%

85%

14,45814,458 5,2655,265 14,66414,664 5,3335,333 2,6782,678 15,62115,621

22,136DISCREPANCY

ER MCOC PSOV

A LEMB AN G, S ULTAN KUD ARA T


79/108


45%55%

29%

71%

5%

95%

4,4864,486 5,4605,460 3,7763,776 9,1279,127 566566 11,72311,723

10,183DISCREPANCY

ER MCOC PSOV

A CU RONG CI TY, SU LTA N K UDAR AT


80/108


78%

22%

77%

23%11%

89%

14,73414,734 4,1604,160 15,22615,226 4,5774,577 566566 4,5774,577

14,585DISCREPANCY

ER MCOC PSOV

U LTAN KUDA RAT


81/108


68%

32%

62%

38%

24%

76%

124,700124,700 58,83758,837 110,140110,140 69,98069,980 40,71440,714 126,822126,822

151,971DISCREPANCY

ER MCOC PCOC


82/108


83/108

COTABATO

May 26, 2004ELLEN PERALTAE ec ti e Assistant


84/108

Len : Hello.Garci: Hello, Len. I-remind nga sila kung

nakapagpadala ba sila ng SOV 15 to 18 sheets sa kwan, sa Cotabato.

Len : Dito, sila ano, sila Ester?Garci: Yung pang switch . Kung sinabihan sila ni

Chairman kasi nagsabi raw si Chairmankagabi

Len : Itatanong ko kay ano, kay Ester ho.Garci: Ok

Executive AssistantOffice of Commissioner Garcillano

ESTER VILLAFLOR ROXAS Director of Election Records and Statistics Department,Comelec. Also in-charge of allocation and distribution of SOVs and COCs.



85/108

85

GMA wanted a lead of at least one (1) million votes.

At that point, GMA had an artificial lead of 567,656 from Luzon and Visayas.

Garcillano tampered with the results inMindanao giving GMA an additional496,116 votes.

As a result, GMA got what she wanted:a lead of 1,063,772 votes.


86/108

86

2,735,0073,231,12372%7,142,0629,946,797MINDANAO

210,755266,706477,46176%878,4161,163,142CARAGA

277,229272,715549,94481%889,8271,095,441ARMM

91,660496,942405,28268%1,266,7991,867,539128,676626,786618,11070%1,500,2652,134,41511

12,429630,059642,48872%1,492,4142,067,10910

96,039441,799537,83869%1,114,3411,619,1519

FPJ LeadGMA LeadFPJ VotesGMAVotes%Total Votes

RegisteredVotersRegion

496,116

But if we look at NAMFRELs count, we


87/108

87

,see some interesting items.

143,524 194,209 337,73372% NAMFREL

77,147 2,220,719 2,143,57274% NAMFREL

496,1162,735,007 3,231,123MINDANAOCongress

210,755266,706477,461CARAGA Congress

82,702 249,767 167,065 52% NAMFREL

277,229272,715549,944 ARMMCongress

129,426 280,375 150,949 50% NAMFREL

91,660496,942405,28212Congress

15,828 543,812 527,98487% NAMFREL

8,676626,786618,11011Congress

39,389 569,030 529,64187% NAMFREL

12,429630,059642,48810Congress

46,674 383,526 430,20084% NAMFREL96,039441,799537,8389Congress

FPJ LeadGMA LeadFPJ VotesGMA Votes


88/108

How were the fraudulent resultslegitimized?

Congressional refusal to openthe ERs.

Congressional dismissal of objections.

Noted

Noted Noted.


89/108

In the dead of night, GMA walked intoCongress to be proclaimed.

3:38 a.m. June 24, 2005House of Representatives


90/108


91/108

NO. A thousand times, NO ! ! !

Todays chaos is the result of corruption andgreed in high places, loss of respect for our

institutions and the death of moral values. And the root of it all is a hopelessly flawedelectoral system.

We must change or our nation will perish.

Let us put a closure to these ISSUES . . .


92/108

Support and pursue to their natural

conclusions the Senate inquiries initiated by Senators Biazon and Gordon on theMontalban raid and missing electionreturns, respectively.

Charge in the appropriate courts of law ,the Comelec Commissioners, ProvincialSupervisors and Election Officers with the

election offenses resulting from theirregularities and anomalies in the 2004election.


93/108

3. Identify the teachers who were not able toserve on May 10,2004 but havecorresponding certified electionreturns.

4. Continue the information dissemination

on the massive electoral fraud to as many Filipinos as possible so they will know ingreater detail how they were deprived of their votes.

Only then can we publicly unearththe TRUTH . . .


94/108

and the TRUTHshall set us FREE.


95/108


96/108


97/108

97

Precinct

Third


98/108

98

Chairman

Member

PollClerk

Recording of Votes on ERPrecinct


99/108

99Election Returns (ER)

DistrictEl i


100/108

100

Canvassing of ERs at theCity / Municipal Hall

Superintendent

ElectionOfficer

City /MunicipalTreasurer

The Statement of Votes


101/108

101

The Statement of Votes (SOV) by Precinct isprepared by the City /Municipal Board of Canvassers to record thevotes of each candidate

in each precinct in the cityor municipality . The SOVby Precinct is certified bythe Board of Canvassers

and witnessed by theaccredited partywatchers.

The City / Municipal


102/108

102

The City / MunicipalCertificate of Canvass (COC) is prepared bythe Board of Canvassers. The COCcontains the total votes

of each candidate for the whole city or municipality . The COCis certified by the Board

of Canvassers andwitnessed by theaccredited partywatchers.


103/108

103

Canvassing at the Provincial Capitol

Superintendent of

Schools

ProvincialElection

Supervisor

ProvincialFiscal

The Statement of Votes (SOV) b Cit /


104/108

104

(SOV) by City /Municipality is prepared

by the Provincial Board of Canvassers to record thevotes of each candidatein each city andmunicipality of theProvince . The SOV byCity / Municipality iscertified by the Board of Canvassers andwitnessed by theaccredited party

watchers The ProvincialCertificate of Canvass


105/108

105

Certificate of Canvass (COC) is prepared by

the Board of Canvassers. The COCcontains the total votes

of each candidate for the whole Province. The COC is certified bythe Board of Canvassers andwitnessed by theaccredited party

watchers


106/108


107/108

107


108/108

2004 election fraud - full presentation 22 oct 05

Documents