130321596 telecom
DESCRIPTION
hi hahaTRANSCRIPT
INDIAN TELECOM SECTOR
AN INDUSTRY ANALYSIS.
Tanmay Jauhary
TELECOM SECTOR- INTRODUCTION Most vibrant sector with highest growth
rate – more than 60 lakh customers are added every month
Plethora of services Easier access/ availability Drastic reduction in tariff World class service
Major classes of Services
• Fixed Copper, Optical Fibre, Wireless
• Mobile GSM and CDMA based
• Narrow band Voice, Internet, Fax
• Broad band High speed Internet, Video
MOBILE TARIFFS IN INDIA ONE OF THE LOWEST
0.230.22
0.19
0.170.16
0.11 0.11 0.11
0.09
0.05 0.050.04
0.030.02
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Be
lgiu
m
Ita
ly
UK
Fra
nc
e
Bra
zil
Ph
ilip
pin
es
Ta
iwa
n
Arg
en
tin
a
Ma
lay
as
ia
Ho
ng
Ko
ng
Th
aila
nd
Pa
kis
tan
Ch
ina
Ind
ia
US
D
KEY POLICY INITIATIVES/MILESTONES
New Economic Policy (1991) Opening up of Telecom service sector
(Mobile –metros)National Telecom Policy 1994
Telecom, key for development Inadequacy of public resource to meet
demand Private sector to supplement Govt. Provide world class telecom service at
affordable cost
TECHNOLOGY TREND
Optical fiber based wireline networks
Wireless networks GSM,CDMA based mobile
Next Generation Networks: Voice , Data, Video convergence
Telecom networks increasingly software intensive
Issues to be addressed in the Indian Scenario
Unique Rural Scenario : low teledensity
Need for Spectrum re-farming & re-allocation
Lack of Content in Local Languages
Network Security
Mobile. 2699.270 M Fixed.1229.987 M Total. 3929.257 M Population 6563.69 M Teledensity. 60.02
220.743
837.195
1744.815
1090.504
35.997
Tel ephone connect ions in mil l ions-2008
Africa
America
Asia
Europe
Oceania
MARKET STRUCTURE Divided into 23 circles
4 metros 19 circles
Further divided into A, B and C category.
Division based on economic parameters and revenue potential
Each circle has a licenses, which are a saleable.
North Eastern States
METRO Circles
Gujarat
Rajasthan
MaharashtraOrissa
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Tamil Nadu
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh E
Bihar
West Bengal
Punjab
Himachal Pradesh
Haryana
Jammu & Kashmir
Uttar Pradesh
W
CHENNAI
MUMBAI
DELHI
KOLKATA
C Circles
B Circles
A Circles
Source :COAI
CURRENT INDUSTRY STRUCTURE
FDI in telecom recently revised to 74%.
Government gets 15% of revenues from Unified Licensing
Ministry of Communication & Information Technology
Regulator
Licensor
Judiciary
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Telecom Dispute Settlement Appellate
Tribunal
Dept of Telecom Unified License Operators
Fixed Line Operators
GSM
900 &
1800
Wireless Operators
National Long Distance Operators
International Long Distance Operators
CDMA
1800Mhz
TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
•Setup in 1997•Protection of Consumer Interest•Nurture Conditions for Growth of Telecom in India•Major Activities
Reduced levies on Operators.Reduced upper limit in tariff (Local, STD &
ISD) and other Inter-operators tariffs.Directives on number of network access
service providers.Policy guidelines on new services like 3G,
Wi-MAX, Internet Telephony, Radio Paging, VSAT, etc.
Regular monitoring of Quality of Service parameters
MAJOR PLAYERS OF INDIAN TELECOM INDUSTRY The Top five companies, on the basis of ‘Market
Share’ as on 31st January, 2009 are:1. Bharti Airtel Ltd.2. Reliance Communications Ltd.3. Vodafone Essar Ltd.4. BSNL5. Idea Cellular + Spice
•Bottom five companies, on the basis of ‘Market Share’ as on 31st January, 2009 are:1. Aircel Cellular Ltd. + Dishnet2. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL)3. BPL Mobile Communications Ltd.4. HFCL Infotel Ltd.5. Shyam Telecom Ltd.
MARKET SHARE OF TELECOM COMPANIES AS ON JANUARY, 2009
PORTER FIVE FORCES MODEL
THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES- LOW
Some Substitutes:
VOIP (Skype, Messenger etc.)
Online Chat
Satellite phones
None of the above a major threat in current scenario,
but a potential threat for near future.
THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS- LOW
Declining Average Revenue Per User.
Infrastructure tenancy costs.
Brand pull exists to some extent for brands
like Airtel / Idea/ Vodafone.
Extremely high infrastructure setup costs
Spectrum License cost- Lotteries, auctions.
Incumbent Advantages: Established brand
image, Reliability of network
POWER OF SUPPLIER- LOW
Large number of suppliers.
Shared tower infrastructure.
Limited pool of skilled managers and engineers
especially those well versed in the latest
technologies.
Medium cost of switching since changing their
hardware would lead to additional cost in modifying
the architecture.
Overall influence on the industry - medium
BARGAINING POWER OF CUSTOMER- HIGH
Lack of differentiation among the service
provider
Cut throat competition
Customer is price sensitive
Low switching costs
Number portability to have negative impact
RIVALRY AMONG COMPETITORS- HIGH
High Exit Barriers
High Fixed Cost
6-7 players in each region
3 out of 4 BIG, present in each region
Very less time to gain advantage by an
innovation (Eg. Caller tunes, life time card)
Price wars
BHARTI AIRTEL- THE MARKET LEADER
Largest Telecom Player in India - ~80Mn, 22.6%
Strategic Alliance with other stakeholders in Bharti Airtel include Sony-Ericsson, Nokia - and Sing Tel
Pan India Presence Strong Financials
Outsourcing of Core Systems
Lack of emerging market investment opportunity
STRENGTHS WEAKNESS
SWOT
SWOT
• Bharti Infratel – Cutting Down cost in Rural area
• Match Box Strategy – Scale of Penetration
• Current Tele-Density – 30.6 is still low among developing countries
• Low Broadband Penetration, Rural Telephony
India centric – Major revenues from India
Falling ARPU Intense Competition
& Shortage of Bandwidth
OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
AIRTEL – STRATEGYMANTRA : Focus on Core Competencies and
Outsource the rest!
STRATEGY• Airtel partnered with leading players in
telecommunication players across the globe.• It has managed to work with the best of
domain specialists globally and emerge as a world class entity.
• Partnerships include operational contracts with vendors and strategic investors ranging from private equity investors to global telecom giants.
STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS/ SHAREHOLDERS – TECHNOLOGY AND CAPITAL Warburg Pincus – a celebrated PE investor
held a stake for a substantial period of time and was instrumental in providing Airtel support in its early stages.
Vodafone was a strategic investor in Airtel. Temasek – the Singapore based investor
holds a considerable stake in it. Was also affiliated with Singapore Telecom.
OUTSOURCING DEALS IN 2004 Ericsson was given the mandate to provide,
manage and maintain the equipment as well as provide quality assurance in Airtel
IBM was given the mandate to handle the back office requirements of Airtel’s presence in India
OPERATIONAL STRATEGIES.• Higher emphasis on ARPU/min – stark
contrast with other operators who concentrate on ARPU only.
• Aim to become a one stop shop for all telecommunication services under the Bharti umbrella.
• Exploring opportunities in international markets.
• Hived off tower infrastructure into a separate entity.