12 million reasons why to ensure a competent food service safety program david ludwig, mph,rs - neha...
TRANSCRIPT
12 Million Reasons 12 Million Reasons Why to Ensure a Why to Ensure a Competent Food Competent Food Service Safety Service Safety
ProgramProgram
David Ludwig, MPH,RS - NEHA 2009
UC Restaurant UC Restaurant LLC, PlaintiffLLC, Plaintiff
vs.vs.Maricopa County, Maricopa County,
Defendant Defendant
No. CV - 05 - 1602 PHX-No. CV - 05 - 1602 PHX-MHMMHM
U.S. Constitution - Amendment 14U.S. Constitution - Amendment 14
Amendment 14 - Citizenship RightsAmendment 14 - Citizenship Rights1. All persons born or naturalized in the United 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United
States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State citizens of the United States and of the State
wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or any law which shall abridge the privileges or
immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or any person of life, liberty, or
property, without property, without due process of law; nor deny to of law; nor deny to any person within its any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection the equal protection
of the laws.of the laws.
Case Based on Constitutional Case Based on Constitutional Rights ViolationsRights Violations
•Requesting a Monetary Requesting a Monetary Settlement of $12,000,000.00Settlement of $12,000,000.00
•Would set Court Case Law for Would set Court Case Law for Due Process on Single Health Due Process on Single Health
Code ViolationsCode Violations
Claimed by PlaintiffClaimed by PlaintiffViolations noted by Inspector were not Violations noted by Inspector were not presentpresentDepartment gave Information to Media to Department gave Information to Media to harm businessharm business
Operator did not have opportunity to Operator did not have opportunity to have violation removedhave violation removed
Negative Publicity resulted in loss of Negative Publicity resulted in loss of Name which they were attempting to Name which they were attempting to Brand Brand
If your Records are electronic If your Records are electronic - are you sure they are the - are you sure they are the same as the copy given to the same as the copy given to the operator?operator?Were you able to capture and Were you able to capture and store an electronic Signature?store an electronic Signature?
Is your electronic data purged Is your electronic data purged routinely or at time of routinely or at time of closure?closure?
Everything is Discoverable Everything is Discoverable
What you send then Delete What you send then Delete does not necessarily get does not necessarily get Deleted by the Recipient Deleted by the Recipient
What you Say can Hurt You – What you Say can Hurt You – What you put in Writing What you put in Writing Definitely Will Hurt YouDefinitely Will Hurt You
The Opposing Attorney is The Opposing Attorney is not Your Friendnot Your FriendThey will do anything to They will do anything to Discredit YouDiscredit YouWhat you say in your What you say in your Deposition may come back Deposition may come back to Haunt You!!to Haunt You!!
Gain Insight into the Juror’s Gain Insight into the Juror’s Thought Process Thought Process
With multiple Jury’s you can With multiple Jury’s you can change your Strategies change your Strategies
If you have a good chance of If you have a good chance of losing – you might consider losing – you might consider settling!settling!
Jury Selection may be as Jury Selection may be as important as the Trial itself important as the Trial itself
The Jury to render a decision The Jury to render a decision for the Plaintiff must be for the Plaintiff must be Unanimous Unanimous Amount of Award is based on Amount of Award is based on Compensatory DamagesCompensatory Damages
The Plaintiff’s CaseThe Plaintiff’s CaseViolations noted by Inspector were not Violations noted by Inspector were not presentpresentDepartment gave Information to Media to Department gave Information to Media to harm businessharm business
Operator did not have opportunity to Operator did not have opportunity to have violation removedhave violation removed
Negative Publicity resulted in loss of Negative Publicity resulted in loss of Name which they were attempting to Name which they were attempting to Brand Brand
Make Sure that you have a Make Sure that you have a Signed & Up To Date Public Signed & Up To Date Public
Information RequestInformation Request
Plaintiff Called WitnessesPlaintiff Called Witnesses
I was called to review I was called to review Awards and SOPsAwards and SOPs
Called Supervisor – Called Supervisor – questioned Evaluation and questioned Evaluation and SOPsSOPsCalled Inspector – Called Inspector – questioned Violationsquestioned Violations
Being a Good WitnessesBeing a Good WitnessesListen to the Attorney’s QuestionListen to the Attorney’s QuestionBe cognizant that they may be Be cognizant that they may be asking more than one question – ask asking more than one question – ask them to simply ask onethem to simply ask one
Don’t be bullied for an answer – let Don’t be bullied for an answer – let the Jury know that answering the the Jury know that answering the question may be confusing question may be confusing When cross examined and When cross examined and redirected don’t waffle or discredit redirected don’t waffle or discredit yourself yourself Direct your answers to the Jury Direct your answers to the Jury members rather than their attorney members rather than their attorney
Have a Descriptive Title for your Have a Descriptive Title for your SOPSOPHave a Good Numbering Have a Good Numbering SystemSystemBe Specific in what is Be Specific in what is RequiredRequiredNever Ever – Reuse an SOP Never Ever – Reuse an SOP NumberNumber
EvaluationsEvaluations
The Plaintiff reviewed Employment The Plaintiff reviewed Employment and Evaluation Histories for All Staff and Evaluation Histories for All Staff
““Improve work quality in the area of Improve work quality in the area of food inspections. Goal: Write more food inspections. Goal: Write more violations. Improve the percentage of violations. Improve the percentage of critical violations. Increase average critical violations. Increase average score.”score.”
What you Write on an Evaluation What you Write on an Evaluation maybe interpreted much maybe interpreted much differently than what you meant or differently than what you meant or what was understoodwhat was understood
Utilizing measures comparing Utilizing measures comparing individuals is Quantitative – Need individuals is Quantitative – Need to follow up with Qualitative to follow up with Qualitative MeasuresMeasures
Never Ever Ever Make Something Never Ever Ever Make Something UpUp
It is always better to be It is always better to be embarrassed than to guess or embarrassed than to guess or make something upmake something upIf a violation is Corrected at time If a violation is Corrected at time of Inspection describe what was of Inspection describe what was done to correct the violation on done to correct the violation on the inspection formthe inspection form
Witness In ChiefWitness In Chief
That is the fancy name I am That is the fancy name I am called for 2 weeks getting to sit called for 2 weeks getting to sit through the entire trialthrough the entire trialYou are both Expert Witness You are both Expert Witness and someone who attempts to and someone who attempts to assist your attorney in assist your attorney in questioning witnessesquestioning witnessesYou’re also the individual You’re also the individual looked upon as the looked upon as the DefendantDefendant
When meeting with someone – When meeting with someone – write everything down including write everything down including when and how you contact themwhen and how you contact them
Expert WitnessesExpert Witnesses
They are used by both sides in an They are used by both sides in an Attempt to Strengthen their CaseAttempt to Strengthen their Case
They are paid by the side they They are paid by the side they represent – monetary amounts are represent – monetary amounts are often told to the Juryoften told to the Jury
Their Scope of Testimony is limited Their Scope of Testimony is limited to their area of Expertiseto their area of Expertise
Doing your homework in Deposition Doing your homework in Deposition can Cancel the effect of an Expertcan Cancel the effect of an Expert
The Flea FlickerThe Flea Flicker
Making the final bid at Who is Making the final bid at Who is Telling the TruthTelling the Truth
The only one more Surprised The only one more Surprised than I – was the Plaintiff’s than I – was the Plaintiff’s AttorneyAttorneyAnd this was the second And this was the second time he was left nearly time he was left nearly speechless!speechless!
The VerdictThe Verdict
We Won but We Won but at a Cost of - at a Cost of - $500,000.00 $500,000.00 to fight this to fight this casecase
Increased Mentoring by Increased Mentoring by Supervisors in the Field – Supervisors in the Field – Standardization of StaffStandardization of StaffEnsuring our Electronic Data Ensuring our Electronic Data Collection is reproducibleCollection is reproducible
Re-Organization – Specialization Re-Organization – Specialization and Delivering a High Quality and Delivering a High Quality Product to Our CustomersProduct to Our Customers