11.interaksi

Upload: phicho5781

Post on 07-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    1/16

    Species interactions incrop communities

    EKOLOGI PERTANIAN

    Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Brawijaya

    Toto Himawan

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    2/16

    COMMUNITY:

    Formed by a complex of interactingpopulations of crops, weeds, insectsand microorganisms.

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    3/16

    Introduction

    Emergent qualities = characteristics of community, important ina systems stability, productivity and dynamic function

    Research typically focused on crop population rather thancommunity of which it is a part

    Lose ability to consider manipulating the community interactionsto benefit cropping system

    Only detrimental interactions have been considered (weeds, pestherbivores, disease)

    Conventional approach minimizes interactions vs. agroecologicalapproach which attempts to understand species interactions inthe context of the larger community

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    4/16

    Interference at thecommunity level

    removal - removal of some resource by one or both of

    the interacting organisms addition - one or both organisms adds some

    substance or structure to the environment

    2 types of interference :

    Advantage of interference approach is that it allows a morecomplete understanding of the mechanisms of interaction

    Ways in which interference may combine to effect cropcommunity

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    5/16

    Modes of interference underlying

    species interaction in communities

    INTERFERENCE

    Allelopathy

    Food source forbeneficials

    Competition

    Parasitism

    Herbivory

    Mutualism

    Microhabitat

    modification

    Addition impact Removal impact

    Combined removal and addition

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    6/16

    Complexity of interactions:

    Interactions are complex and difficult to

    discern

    Grass - clover example

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    7/16

    Coexistence:

    Populations of similar organisms often share the samehabitat even though niches highly overlap

    Ecologists widely accept the idea that selection for

    coexistence may be the rule more than the exception Many domesticated species have evolved in polycultures

    Understanding mechanisms of interference that allowcoexistence will help us design multiple crop

    communities Combine species with slightly different physiological

    characteristics or resource needs to promotecoexistence

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    8/16

    Mutualism:

    3 Types:

    Inhabitational - one mutualist lives wholly or partly inside the other

    (eg. Rhizobium bacteria and leguminous plants)

    Exhabitational - organisms are relatively independent physically,

    but interact directly (eg. flowering plant and its insect pollinator)

    Indirect - interactions among a set of species modify the

    environment in which they all live to the benefit of the mixture;

    involve more than 2 species (eg. polyculture agroecosystem)

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    9/16

    Mutualism:

    Facultative mutualisms = all members cansurvive alone but benefit from interaction

    Often mutualisms help species avoid somenegative impact

    Increase resistance of entire system tonegative impacts of pests, diseases and weeds

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    10/16

    Mutually Beneficial Interferencesat Work in Agroecosystems

    Beneficial Interferences of Cover Crops:

    Beneficial Interferences of Weeds:

    Intercropping :

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    11/16

    Beneficial Interferences of CoverCrops :

    Cover crop = plant species (usually grasses or legumes)grown in pure or mixed stands to cover the soil of the cropcommunity for part or all of the year

    Green manure = cover crop tilled into the soil to add OM

    Living mulch = cover crop grown directly with other crops

    Reduce soil erosion; improve soil structure; enhance soilfertility; suppress weeds, insects, and pathogens (see Table15.1 for more benefits)

    May be beneficial at some times while detrimental at others(see CASE STUDY rye/bellbeans)

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    12/16

    Beneficial Interferences of Weeds :

    With proper management, weeds can serve role ofcover crop

    Modification of the Cropping SystemEnvironment

    Control of Insect Pests by Promotion ofBeneficial Insects

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    13/16

    Modification of the Cropping SystemEnvironment

    Weeds protect soil surface from erosion

    take up nutrients that might otherwise be

    leached add OM

    selectively inhibit development of more

    noxious species through allelopathy

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    14/16

    Control of Insect Pests by Promotion ofBeneficial Insects

    Certain weeds should be regarded asimportant components of the crop communitybecause of the positive effects they have onpopulations of beneficial insects

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    15/16

    Intercropping:

    Two or more crops planted together may reduce needfor external inputs

    Mostly used in the tropics

    Corn-bean-squash polyculture example

    - growing 3 crops together gave higher total yield

    - LER>1

    Understanding ecological foundation of the

    interactions in polycultures is key to returning its

    prominence to agriculture

  • 8/3/2019 11.INTERAKSI

    16/16

    Using Species Interactions forSustainability

    Challenge for agroecologists is to putecological understanding into the context ofsustainability