1 status of glc physics and detector studies akiya miyamoto kek, ipns 20 february 2004

43
1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

Upload: junior-walters

Post on 18-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

1

Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies

Akiya MiyamotoKEK, IPNS

20 February 2004

Page 2: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

2A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Contents

Physics studies LC Physics Study Group Higgs

Detector R&D R&D goals Vertex Tracker Calorimeter

Machine-Detector issues Summary

Page 3: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

3A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

LC Physics Study Group

LC Physics Study group has been formed since April 2003. Joint activities of experimentalists and theorists Objectives:

Physics case of LC during LHC era. LC and Cosmology connection Physics case at 1 TeV.

Sub-groups: Higgs, New Physics, Top, Luminosity 3 group wide meetings, lectures, and many sub-group m

eetings. Results were presented at 6th ACFA and will be presente

d at LCWS2004.

Page 4: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

4A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Higgs sub-group Objectives

Higgs mass, width, … Self-coupling Top yukawa coupling Heavy Higgs (MSSM, THDM), …

Find out how well we can measure these observables and detector requirements to obtain best results

Page 5: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

5A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Higgs self coupling

A systematic study of many processes, , , , , , ,...e e ZH H eeH ZHH ttH WWH HH

Our approach: Develop LCGrace ( includes final 6f. 8f in future)

Total > 30 processes Develop a common interface to detector simulators

Signal process Confirm theoreticalresults by Y.Okada et.al.

Page 6: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

6A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Sample events

e e t t H e e HH

Simulation studies just begun !

Page 7: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

Detector R&D

Page 8: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

8A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

GLC Detector Concepts Detector requirements

Efficient & High purity b/c tagging

Momentum resolution:

For Higgs detection regardless of its decay mode.

Calorimeter:For W and Z separation in hadronic decay mode.

Hermeticity:For indirect measurements of invisible particles

Good background masking and time stamping capability

5/ 5 10T T Tp p p

/ 30%/ jet jet jetE E E

10veto a few mrad

ACFA report,KEK Report 2001-11

Page 9: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

9A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

CCD Vertex Detector

Collaboration KEK, Niigata, Tohoku, Tohoku Gakuin,

Toyama Collage of Maritime Tech.

Challenges of Vertex Detector R&D 4~5 layers of thin(<100m) pixel detectors from ra

dius of 1~2cm and position resolution of ~3m.

Fast readout Radiation hard

2/310~ 5sin

IPp

Page 10: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

10A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

CTI by 90Sr and 150MeV e- Beam

150 MeV e-

90Sr

NIEL models

CTI by H.E.e-

is 2~3 times smallerthan model expectations

Ee(MeV)

Page 11: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

11A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Effect of Fat-zero Charge

CTI is 4~6 x smaller by fat zero charge injection

Page 12: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

12A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Study of charge spread in CCD

Diffusion of electrons in epitaxial layer Key of excellent spatial reso

lution for CCD ( and CMOS ) Takes time to diffuse : How long do we have to wait

for the charge collection ? Measurement with IR LASER pulse at Niigata Univ.

Page 13: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

13A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Measurement of charge diffusion

The timing of laser injection was delayed and measured the time required to get full charge

Delay of laser injection(nsec)

Consistent with Diffusion constatnt(D) =37cm2/s@300K Laser injection

(=1064nm)

CCD 10m epi-layer

Page 14: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

14A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Implication to readout timing

The measured data is consistent with the expectation for the diffusion length of

d = sqrt(Dt) ~ 20m @ t=100ns For the sensors with 20m epi-layer, we should wait f

or the diffusion at least 100ns Readout speed requirement for the vertex detector at

cold machine is even more severe 50 MHz (original requirement)

50x337ns/(337ns-100ns) = 70MHz

Vertex detector at cold machine is very challenging

Page 15: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

15A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Future Plan Objective:

Fabrication of prototype sensors and ladders for a vertex detector which can achieve the impact parameter resolution of b=510/(psin3/2) m Thin wafer to minimize multiple scattering Put as close to IP as possible Radiation immunity Fast readout Multi-port readout (need ASIC) Other technology if cold technology is selected 3 years project

Partially thinned structure Multi-port readout

Page 16: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

16A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Tracker Collaboration

Hiroshima, KEK, Kinki, Kogakuin, Saga, TUAT, Tsukuba, MSU

First choice was Small Cell Drift Chamber, Compare to Silicon based tracker,

Thinner material and redundancy due to many sampling Compare to TPC with MWPC readout

Enough spatial resolution to achieve resolution goal

Standalone T0 determination

2 4/ 1 10 ( )T Tp p CDConly

Page 17: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

17A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Selected results of CDC R&D

Degradation due to O2 contamination.Without O2, ~90m

4.6m-long chamber: Spatial resolutionTwo-track efficiency

Good for >2mm

B dependence of Lorentz angle

tan 0.159 0.002 tan

B(Tesla)

Straight cell is OK Up to ~ 3T

Page 18: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

18A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Time stamping capability

CDC: self t0 reconstruction by staggered cell TPC: by Z coordinate matching with an external device

Simulation of T0 reconstruction: Signal on random background

CDC(p=1GeV)~2.2ns

TPC+(p=1GeV)~3.8ns

Note: GLC bunch separation is 1.4nsecT0(nsec)

Page 19: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

19A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

New direction of Tracker R&D

Tracker group considers initial R&D goals has been achieved.

Instead of go in to the next step of engineering studies, tracker group thinks it important to seek for other possibilities: TPC with Micro Pattern Gas Detector readout

Page 20: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

20A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Micro Pattern Gas Detector Example: GEM

70 µm

140 µm

Electrons are amplifiedby a strong field at holes

Why MPGD ? Spatial resolution and 2-hit separation similar to CDC Less sector boundary than MWPC-TPC Can operate with B>3T TPC can be used in “cold machine”

Page 21: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

21A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Plan of TPC R&D

R&D goals Develop large area a Micro Pattern device Operate in B-field and confirm performance Develop high density, low mass readout

Collaboration for TPC R&D CDC collaboration + Tokyo + … Internationally, work together with Munich,

LBL, ….

Page 22: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

22A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Calorimeter R&D Collaboration:

KEK, Kobe, Konan, Niigata, Shinshu, Tsukuba

International Collaboration: JINR/DLNP, Russia:

KEK/IPNS and JINR have concluded on MoU on linear collider detector R&Ds in July 2003.

Based on this MoU, fabrication of test modules are in progress. They will be tested at KEK in March 2004.

DESY, Germany: Co-works with DESY-HCAL group are in progress on photon dete

ctor R&D and on beam test programs. Our shower position detectors were tested at DESY in collaborat

ion with DESY-HCAL group in Sep. 2003. They will participate in our beam test at KEK in March 2004,

with their photo-detectors

Page 23: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

23A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Goal of Calorimeter R&D Design criteria to achieve 2-jet mass resolution sufficient to separate

W and Z. Good energy resolution for single particles Fine transverse and longitudinal granularity for PFA Operational in strong magnetic field – Photon detector Hermeticity

Baseline design Lead/plastic scintillator sampling calorimeter for ECAL/HCAL

4cmWx4cmHx1mmT-sci. + 4mmT-Pb Hardware compensation for excellent hadron energy resolution and

linearity Optional design

Strip-array ECAL, 1cmHx20cmWx2mmT-Sci Strip-array ECAL has been tested since 2002

Page 24: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

24A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

ECAL Beam tests Objectives

Study uniformity for the simulator inputs Resolutions of energy, position, and shower direction Examine 2-cluster separation and ghost-rejection

Three tests in series since Fall of 2002 2002: T517 at KEK (e//, 1-4 GeV)

tile/fiber ECAL, strip-array ECAL, sinti-strip Shmax 2003: Test at DESY ( e, 1-6 GeV)

Scinti-strip SHmax with WLS-fiber and APD readout. 2004: T545 at KEK ( e//, 1-4 GeV)

Compare several readout, HAPD, APD, SiPM, EBCCD,.. Check performance of tile/fiber made by JINR.

Page 25: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

25A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

ECAL beam test setup

DESY ST21DESY ST21

Strip-array with direct mount APD

Strip-array ECAL

Page 26: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

26A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Beam test results

Energy resolution:Consistent with MC if photonstatistics are taken into account.Design criteria satisfied

Position resolution:Best at shower maximum~ 2mm for 4GeV electron

Angular resolution:Angle of shower axis is determined by a linear fit of first 5SL.~50mrad for 4GeV electron

Page 27: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

27A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Photon detector R&D Photon-detectors are now the most essential component of any

plastic scintillator-based calorimeters Following devies are tested in JFY2003.

APD Multi-channel HPD Multi-channel HAPD EBCCD SiPM

APD(Hamamatsu S8864-55) were already used for the strip-array detector, satisfactory

Others are tested in March 2004 beamtest

EBCCD

Page 28: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

28A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Plan of CAL study in 2004 Carry out full simulation study (based on

Geant4) to get optimum parameters for ultimate calorimeter performance

Fully understand and establish design and performance of tile/fiber calorimeter based on the test module construction experience and test beam data so far

Continue photon detector R&D’s and find best device: High gain, Operate in B field, timing

information, Low cost, availability, …

Page 29: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

29A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

IR and BDS Issues

Issues covered by IR and BDS studies Estimation of background in Detectors Nanometer stabilization Beam parameters Beam delivery system Interaction region and dump line Stabilization R&D Instrumentation R&D …

Page 30: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

30A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

FEM analysis of Support tube

fres shifts

Support near IP is crucialFEM calculation consisten with a test by 1/10 model Next step is to test a real size model.

Page 31: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

31A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

FEATHER

Test of the system has started at the ATF extraction line.

Feedback AT High EnergyRequirements

IP BPM proc.&AMP

BPM

Kicker

Simulation results

N.Delerue

Bunch numberB

eam

off

set

Turns on feedbackafter 10 bunches

Page 32: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004
Page 33: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

33A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Test of Kicker performances (at low frequency)

Kicker pulses were fed from upstream and down stream of the kicker and kick intensity is compared

Larger kick intensity is seen when the pulse is fed downstream. This is qualitatively

consistent with theoretical expectation.

Quantitative disagreement would be due to miss alignments of beam and kicker strip.

Study continues to stabilize the beam at ATF by this Autumn.

Kicker gap

Kic

k in

tensi

ty(

m)

Page 34: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

34A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Time scale of Detector R&D

Now accelerator activities are pursued under the global framework International Technology Recommendation Panel 2004 Global Design Organization 2005 2008

Detector time scale has been discussed by WWS and ILCSC. “CDR” should be prepared timely with GDO Technology study Global Detector Collaboration

Next 3 years:Select detector technology

http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/alcpg04/Plenary/Saturday/Session1/Yu_TestBeam.pdf

Page 35: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

35A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Summary LC Physics study group has been formed and new activities

are initiated. Detector R&D continues:

VTX: Radiation hardness by H.E. electrons, charge diffusion

Tracker: CDC TPC

Calorimeter: Strip-array EM-Cal, photon detectors

These studies shall be converged to “CDR” in ~3 years Detector-Machine issues

Support tube R&D Full scale test FEATHER at ATF

Page 36: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

36A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Backup slides

Page 37: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

By Y.Yasui

Page 38: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

39A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Achievement in 2003 Study of radiation tolerance of CCDs

Jul. - Oct. : High energy (150MeV) electron irradiation test at LNS (Tohoku)

Energy dependence of radiation damage effect on CCDs has been shown.

Generation of hot pixels was observed. Demonstration of effect of ‘Fat-zero’ charge injection

Beam background simulation With 20mrad crossing angle Off-axis collision

Study of charge spread in CCDs Development of cPCI ADC & DAQ system Study of thin CCD wafers

Page 39: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

40A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

R&D items of CDC

Can we control gravitational and electrostatic wire sags for a 4.6m-long wires ?

Can we achieve a spatial resolution of 85 microns everywhere in the big chamber ?

Can we achive 2-track separation better than 2mm ? Can we stably operate 4.6m-long stereo cells ? Is Lorents angle small enough to allow straight cells ? Is gas gain saturation observed for cools gas mixtures n

o problem ? Is tension drop controllable for Al wires ? How well can we time-stamp bunches ? Is neutron BG not serious ?

Page 40: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

41A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Score of CDC R&D items

Can we control gravitational and electrostatic wire sags for a 4.6m-long wires ?

Can we achieve a spatial resolution of 85 microns everywhere in the big chamber ?

Can we achive 2-track separation better than 2mm ? Can we stably operate 4.6m-long stereo cells ? Is Lorentz angle small enough to allow straight cells ? Is gas gain saturation observed for cools gas mixtures n

o problem ? Is tension drop controllable for Al wires ? How well can we time-stamp bunches ? Is neutron BG not serious ?

Yes

Yes

YesYes

Yes

Yes

Yes

OKf orB 3T

???

Page 41: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

42A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

CAL. Simulation studies

Particle reconstruction at LC is very challenging and extensive simulation study is mandatory.

Nevertheless, it has had lower priority to complete beam test before PS shutdown

Geant3 based full simulator has been in operation for years

This year, strip-array EMCal is implemented in Geant3 framework and performance studies are carried out.

But particle flow algorithm is not working well yet. This will be a main objective of coming years.

Page 42: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

43A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Stabilization R&D: Support tube

Two models are compared by FEM

Page 43: 1 Status of GLC Physics and Detector Studies Akiya Miyamoto KEK, IPNS 20 February 2004

44A.Miyamoto, LCPAC, 2004/02/20

Test of FEM by 1/10 model