1 philanthropy and government funding. 2 outline fundraising facts the beneficiaries of giving...

29
1 Philanthropy and Government Funding

Post on 21-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Philanthropy and Government Funding

2

Outline

• Fundraising facts• The beneficiaries of giving• Social enterprise marketing

basics

3

• Potential donors: prospects who have not given yet

• New donors: given for the first time.• Transition donors: given three or more

years in a row• Core donors: given three or more years

in a row.• Lapsed donors. After two years: “deeply

lapsed.”• Lapsed but reactivated donors

Not All Donors Are Alike

4

Strategies for different donors

WINKEEPLIFT

5

Donor Ecosystem

New donors Lapsed donors

Transition donors

Core donors

Win Win

Keep

KeepLift

6

The dimensions of a typical list

Percentage of active donors Percentage of revenues

Core30%

Transition18%Lapsed but

reactivated19%

New33%

Core50%

Transition17%

Lapsed but reactivated

14%

New19%

Percentage of active donors Percentage of revenues

Core30%

Transition18%Lapsed but

reactivated19%

New33%

Core50%

Transition17%

Lapsed but reactivated

14%

New19%

7

Gift sizes

$128

$81

$60

$51$46

$42 $43

$37

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

Core Transition Lapsed butreactivated

New

Average annual dollars given

Average gift

8

Donor retention

69%

38%

8%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Core Transition Lapsed but reactivated

9

Average number of donations

2.8

1.9

1.4 1.4

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Core Transition Lapsed butreactivated

New

10

Long Term Value Index

The LTV of donors can be accurately predicted by the amount of their first gifts.

10

11

Why Do Donors Defect?Survey of British Donors who Stopped Giving

• Other NPOs more deserving: 27%• Can’t afford: 22%• Don’t remember supporting: 11%• Didn’t like fundraising: 7%• Not re-asked to give: 3%• Bad service: 2%• Not enough information on uses: 2%• No thank-you: 2%• Felt not needed: 1%

Ref.: Sargeant 2001

12

The Big Myth: Donor Fatigue

• Data show that complainers are rarely donors in the first place

• People who give to you love you• …and people who love you like

hearing from you• People who give once are

waiting to give again

13

The Best Donor Pool

• Volunteering and giving are complements, not substitutes

• Volunteering predicts money giving more strongly than income, age, religion, or education

• Don’t forget that donor fatigue doesn’t exist

14

Important Lessons

• Enterprises leave money on the table…– …if they don’t track donors– …if they treat all donors as the

same

• Focus on the core…– …but don’t neglect the others—they

are the future core

15

How to Fundraise

• Build a donor file• Organize it by type of donor• Design appeals appropriate to

donor type• Focus time and money on the

high-yield donors

16

Outline

• Fundraising facts• The beneficiaries of giving• Social enterprise marketing

basics

17

Does Charity Lead to Higher Incomes?

• Statistical objectives– Look only at the part of the income-giving

relationship that goes from charity to income changes

– Control for other factors like education, age, and race

• Two people, identical in every way, except that one gives $100 and the other doesn’t

• First person enjoys—as a result of the gift—$375 dollars in higher income

18

Philanthropy and Economic Growth

$-

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002

An

nu

al g

ivin

g p

er c

apit

a

$-

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000

$40,000

$45,000

Per

cap

ita

per

son

al in

com

e

Giving

Income

• 1% increase in giving this year ($1.9b total) results in a GDP increase of $37b

• Philanthropy is an excellent investment

19

Givers are much happier than nongivers

• Why?– Our brains are wired to serve– Approval of our peers– Improved control– Better health– Better citizenship

20

Getting beyond the myths

• Myth #1: Giving makes us poorer• Myth #2: People are naturally

selfish• Myth #3: Giving is a luxury• Myth #4: An entrepreneurial

nation can afford to forgo service• Myth #5: Fundraising is a

necessary evil

21

Outline

• Fundraising facts• The beneficiaries of giving• Social enterprise marketing

basics

22

Social Enterprise Marketing

• Marketing: Plan, price, promote, and distribute an NPO’s programs and products

• Marketing tasks– Define target markets

• Who should our clients (or donors) be?

– Link to these clients• How do we reach them?• What “price” attracts them?• How do we communicate with them?

Ref.: Rodos

23

Why Is Social Marketing Difficult?

• Nonprofit “culture” (i.e. attitudes about efficiency, bottom line, commercialization, etc.)

• Unrealistic goals• Unreliability of resources (i.e.

volatile donations)• HR issues (staff vs. volunteers)

24

Steps in Building aMarketing Strategy

• External analysis– Who are my

constituents?– Who are my

competitors?– What is my industry?

• Internal analysis– What do constituents

think we do?– What do constituents

think we ought to do?

• Firm development– Market growth– Product growth

• Strategy selection and evaluation

• Communication

25

Competition

• Competition for what?– Members/clients– Donors/volunteers/

donations– Inventory (e.g. books,

art works, etc.)

• Competition with whom?– Other social

enterprises– For-profits– Governments

• Identifying competition– Similarity of prizes

(management perspective)

– Similarity of services (client/donor perspective)

– Common competitor: inaction (e.g. no medical care)

26

Firm Development

Existing markets

New markets

Existing products

Market penetration

Market expansion

New products

Product development

Diversification

Nonprofit example:University

Existing markets

New markets

Existing products

Recruit college-bound seniors

Recruit career-changers

New products

Create a new program for

undergraduates

Create an executive

education program

Ref.: Rodos

27

Communication Tools

• Explicit communications– Annual reports– Newsletters– Press releases– Brochures– Direct mail– Media advertising– Telemarketing– Special events

• Implicit communications– Pricing– Products– Distribution

28

Targeting Messages to Demographic Groups

Ref.: Van Slyke 2002

DEMOGRAPHICS TO TARGET

FUNDRAISING FOCUS

SENSE OF COM-MUNITY

CHARITIES ARE MORE EFFECTIVE THAN GOV’T

SENSE OF DUTY

HELPED YOU IN TIMES OF NEED

TAX BENEFITS

RELIGIOUS REASONS

LOW INCOME

X X

YOUNGER

X

PRACTICING FAITH

X X

MARRIED

X

SINGLE

NONWHITE

X X

WOMEN

X X X X

CONSERVATIVES

X

VOLUNTEER

X X X X X

29

Messages Types

Promote Refute

Abstract “Giving is vital for society”

“Y our gift might be small, but you’re doing your part”*

Concrete

“Giving makes you feel good”*

“Y our gift can achieve X, even if it’s as small as Y ”

*Found to be most effective

Ref.: Clary