1 org theory session 1 [compatibility mode]

Upload: fallenscimmy

Post on 04-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    1/22

    Organizing is a subset of larger activity of managing. It is theprocess by which the structure of an organization is createdand maintained. The process includes

    The determination of the specific activities to

    accomplish the objectives

    The grouping of activities and assigning these tospecified positions/ persons

    e crea on o ne wor o pos ons persons or epurpose of planning, motivation, communication,coordination & control

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    2/22

    1

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    3/22

    Bureaucracy - Max Weber

    Rules and regulation

    Hierarchy

    Paper work

    Professional qualifications and Expert Training

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    4/22

    Administrative Theory - Henri Fayol 1916 French Industrialist

    1. Division of Work2. Authority & Responsibility

    3. Discipline

    4. Unity of Command

    5. Unity of Direction

    6. Subordination of Individual Interest to General Interest

    .

    8. Centralization

    9. Scalar Chain

    10.Order

    11.Equity

    12.Stability of tenure of personnel

    13.Initiative

    14.Espirit de corps Union is strength

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    5/22

    Scientific Management F W Taylor 1900 Micro

    Four Principles of Scientific Management

    1. Develop science for each element of mans work which

    replaces the old rule-of-thumb approach

    2. Scientifically select and then train, teach and develop the

    workman (where as earlier he decided)

    3. Management should heartily cooperate with the workers so as

    to ensure all the work being done in accordance with theprinciples of scientific management

    4. There is almost equal division of work between management

    and workmen. Management should take over the work for

    which they are better suited.

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    6/22

    Neo Classical Viewpoint Human Relations Theory

    Hawthorne experiments at Western Electric Company by Elton

    Mayo 1924 to 1932

    1924 to 27 variation in illumination productivity raised

    1927 to30 Telephone operator work conditions

    Social interaction amongst employee supervisor influenced

    productivity

    1931 study How group norms affect group efforts and output

    IMPORTANT: Neo classical theory does not replace classicalview

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    7/22

    /

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    8/22

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    9/22

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    10/22

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    11/22

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    12/22

    ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE & DESIGN

    need an effective structure to achieve org.

    goals/plans/strategies

    org. structure formal framework for jobs,

    tasks to be divided, grouped and coordinatedorg. design process that involves decisions

    about

    - work specialization- departmentalization

    - chain of command

    - span of control- centralization and decentralization

    - formalization

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    13/22

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    14/22

    WORK SPECIALIZATION

    Early in 2oth century, Henry Ford divisionof labor concept in his assembly line, workersassigned specific, repetitive task-helpedincrease productivity

    Today Work specialization means degree towhich tasks in an organization are dividedinto separate jobs

    too specialized offset the advantages boredom, fatigue, stress, poor quality Managers see it as important organizingmechanism but not source of ever-increasingproductivity Broaden job scope, teamwork and reducedwork specialization

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    15/22

    DEPARTMENTALIZATION

    process of grouping together jobs and people into

    separate units to accomplish org. goals. 5 common forms

    functional departmentalization(group by functions performed)

    geographic departmentalization(basis of territorial area)

    departmentalization

    customer departmentalization(on the basis of common customers)

    process departmentalization

    (group on basis of product process or customer flow)

    customer departmentalization used to better monitorcustomer needscross functional teams flexible interdisciplinary teams

    replaced traditional functional groupings

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    16/22

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    17/22

    NEW DEVELOPMENTS Authority, responsibility, chain of command less relevantbecause of IT and employee empowerment

    Employees can access info that used to be available tomanagers

    Also using computers employees can communicate directlywithout going through chain of command

    Employees empowered to make decisions managementuse self-managed teams

    New organization designs with multiple bosses continue tobe implemented, therefore traditional concepts of authority,

    responsibility and chain of command becoming irrelevant

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    18/22

    SPAN OF CONTROL no. of employees a manager can supervise effectively and efficiently.

    Classical view not more than 6 (small span) Helps determine no. of levels and managers

    1

    2

    3

    4

    1

    8

    64

    512

    new (contemporary) viewpoint span of control increasing flatter organization

    less direct supervision, well trained and experienced staff

    new (contemporary) viewpoint span of control increasing flatter organization less direct supervision, well trained and experienced staff

    5 4096

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    19/22

    CENTRALIZATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

    how much decision making authority has beendelegated lower levels classical centralized decision-making

    as org. become more complex and dynamic decentralize decision making decisions should be made by those who have best

    empowerment is a managerial approach in whichemployees are given substantial authority and say tomake decisions on their own

    - involve business decisions- design & prod. Of products- front line/desk service counters

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    20/22

    FORMALIZATION

    Degree to which jobs within org. are

    standardized

    Extent to which employed behavior guided

    y ru es an proce ures

    Explicit job descriptions, clearly defined

    procedures covering work processes

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    21/22

    ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN DECISIONSmechanistic org.- rigid, tightly controlled

    organic highly adaptive and flexible

    Mechanistic Organic

    High specialization Cross-functional Teams

    Rigid Departmentalization Cross-Hierarchical Teams

    Clear Chain of Command Free Flow of Info.

    Narrow Spans of Control Wide Spans of Control

    Centralization Decentralization

    High Formalization Low Formalization

  • 8/13/2019 1 Org Theory Session 1 [Compatibility Mode]

    22/22

    Contingency Factors Deciding Org. Design

    Strategy and Structure innovators need flexibility, costminimizes seek efficiency, tight controls of mechanisticstructure

    Size and Structure large (2000 employees) more

    specialize, departments > mechanistic whereas Small co. organic, loose, flexible

    Technolo and Structure Batch or unit roduction

    organic, Mass production mechanistic, and Continuousprocess production organic

    Environmental Uncertainty and Structure mechanisticstructure suitable for stable simple environment. Global

    competition, accelerated product innovation bycompetitors, increased demands for high quality and fastdelivery are dynamic environmental forces. Need lean, fastflexible