1 comparison of surface models derived by manual, lidar, and softcopy techniques uw-madison ncrst-i...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy
Techniques
UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team
Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa Adams (Investigators)
Nick Koncz (Project Manager)
Hongwei Zhu, Amar Padmanabhan, Jisang Park (Research Assistants)
![Page 2: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy
Techniques
Objectives
Determine Differences among Results from the Various Techniques
Seek Methods for Improving Accuracies by Technology Integration
Seek Methods for Reducing Required Editing Time for Raw Softcopy Data
![Page 3: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Test Site: Highway Corridor Near Solon, IA
![Page 4: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Data Sets
Manual Photogrammetry Data Set Provided by Iowa DOT and CTRE:
Breaklines and Mass Points (~20-Meter Spacing)
Compiled on Analytical Stereoplotters from 1:4800 (nominal scale) photos
Expected Accuracy: 0.07-0.10m RMS
![Page 5: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Breaklines and Mass Points
![Page 6: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
1-Meter DEM Generatedfrom Manual Photogrammetry Data Set
![Page 7: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Data Sets
Softcopy Photogrammetry Data Set:
Same Photography as Manual Method Same Camera Calibration Same External Orientation Parameters
Film Diapositives Scanned at 15 Micrometers
38 Photos in 3 Strips – 35 Stereo Models
![Page 8: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Data Sets
Softcopy Photogrammetry Data Set: In-House Software
Resampled Epipolar Images
1:32 Image Pyramids
Cross-Correlation
Least Squares Matching
Generates Irregular 1-Meter Spacing of Elevations
![Page 9: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Correlation Coefficients from a Single Model
Red = 0.5-0.7
Yellow = 0.7-0.9
Green = > 0.9
![Page 10: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
DEM by Softcopy Photogrammetry
![Page 11: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Data Sets
LIDAR Data Set: Irregular 2-Meter Spacing of Elevations
Expected Accuracy: 0.15m RMS
Raw Data Were Edited, But Some Vegetation (e.g., Crops) Were Not Removed
![Page 12: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Part of the LIDAR Data Set
![Page 13: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Parts of the Three Data Sets
Sample Comparisons and Results
![Page 14: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Comparison Methodology
TINs
Manual PhotogrammetryMass Points and Breaklines
20m spacing (irregular)
LIDAR2 m spacing (irregular)
DigitalPhotogrammetry
1 m spacing (irregular)
POINTS
DEMs
DEMComparisons
POINT To TINComparisons
![Page 15: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Sample Comparisons and Results
DifferenceType
Mean RMS Mean RMS(m) (m) (m) (m)
Sub-Area 1: Farmland DEM 0.29 0.39 0.33 0.35Without crops PT-TIN 0.21 0.37 0.31 0.37
Sub-Area 2: Farms/Road DEM 0.29 0.33 -0.11 0.27Without crops PT-TIN -0.37 0.43 -0.21 0.33
Sub-Area 3: Mixed Use DEM -0.13 0.39 0.17 0.21Without Hwy PT-TIN -0.14 0.69 0.12 0.21
AVERAGE DEM 0.15 0.37 0.13 0.28PT-TIN -0.10 0.50 0.07 0.30
Location 1: Drainage Ditch DEM 0.14 0.59 0.09 0.31PT-TIN 0.22 0.57 0.11 0.41
Location 2: Gully DEM 0.00 0.43 0.09 0.26PT-TIN 0.23 0.64 0.13 0.35
Location 3: Bridge DEM -0.25 0.33 0.14 0.19Without bridge deck PT-TIN -0.17 0.39 0.14 0.24
AVERAGE DEM -0.04 0.45 0.11 0.25PT-TIN 0.09 0.53 0.13 0.33
Softcopy
Area+ 2 m Tolerance
with 1st Approx.
ExtractionLIDAR
Preliminary Results Indicate that Softcopy Data are at Least as Good as LIDAR when Compared to Manually-Extracted Data.
![Page 16: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Sample Comparisons and Results
Mixed Land Use
![Page 17: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Sample Comparisons and Results
Drainage Ditch
![Page 18: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18Softcopy / LIDAR Integration Project StatusSoftcopy Extraction w/LIDAR (Initial Comparison)
Model 127 PT-To-TIN Comparison Area #Points Min Max Mean StdDev RMS
Auto Match/ Manualw/o 1st approximation Whole DEM 3,615 -2.13 1.67 0.17 0.21 0.27
2m tolerance 3,615 -0.72 5.43 0.86 1.22 1.49
w/o 1st approximation W/O Road 1,202 -0.97 1.04 0.13 0.17 0.222m tolerance 1,202 -0.36 2.10 0.12 0.17 0.21
w/ LiDAR approximation + 1 m tolerance2.5M Spacing Whole DEM 3,615 -0.88 1.00 0.14 0.14 0.20
W/O Road 1,202 -0.74 1.00 0.10 0.15 0.18
5M Spacing Whole DEM 3,615 -0.87 0.97 0.14 0.13 0.19W/O Road 1,202 -0.63 0.97 0.08 0.14 0.16
10M Spacing Whole DEM 3,615 -1.19 0.75 0.13 0.14 0.19W/O Road 1,202 -0.63 0.71 0.08 0.14 0.16
LiDAR/ Manual Whole DEM 3,615 -1.59 2.89 -0.15 0.48 0.50W/O Road 1,202 -1.45 2.89 -0.14 0.68 0.69
LiDAR/ Auto Matchw/o 1st approximation Whole DEM 163,190 -5.55 2.99 -0.32 0.40 0.52
2m tolerance 134,705 -6.00 2.91 -0.33 0.40 0.52
w/o 1st approximation W/O Road 109,640 -2.67 2.99 -0.31 0.39 0.502m tolerance 104,124 -2.00 2.91 -0.31 0.34 0.46
![Page 19: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19Softcopy / LIDAR Integration Project Status
Softcopy Extraction w/LIDAR (Initial Comparison)
Drainage Ditch PT-To-TIN #Points Min Max Mean StdDev RMS
Auto Match/ Manual 215w/o 1st approximation -0.23 0.79 0.17 0.17 0.24
2m tolerance -3.36 1.04 0.11 0.39 0.41
w/ LiDAR approximation + 1 m tolerance2.5 m Spacing -0.55 0.90 0.18 0.18 0.25
5 m spacing -0.68 1.23 0.19 0.20 0.2810 m spacing -0.45 1.12 0.20 0.19 0.28
LiDAR/ Manual 215 -0.71 1.66 0.22 0.53 0.57
LiDAR/ Auto Matchw/o 1st approximation 14611 -1.45 1.93 -0.10 0.58 0.59
2m tolerance 93104 -1.91 4.23 -0.06 0.58 0.58
![Page 20: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Softcopy Editing Tools
Automated Slope Filter (Spikes and Holes)
Manual (Stereo Viewing) Point-by-Point
Polygon Constant Elevation
Polygon Planar Fit
![Page 21: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Manual Editing Tool Menu
![Page 22: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Manual Editing Polygon Selection Tool
![Page 23: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Manual Editing Set-to-Constant Elevation Tool
![Page 24: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
One of the Stereo Pairs
![Page 25: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Raw Softcopy Data
![Page 26: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
After Slope Filter
![Page 27: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
After Slope Filter
![Page 28: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
After Manual Editing
![Page 29: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
After Manual Editing
![Page 30: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Effects of Slope Filter(Crop area was excluded)
Model: 4-1-125
Difference DEM Area #Points Min Max Mean StdDev RMS
Auto Match/ Manualw/ USGS approximation
Whole DEM 5044 -3.88 1.66 -0.19 0.5 0.54
W/O Road 3793 -3.88 1.66 -0.16 0.5 0.52
w/ LiDAR approximationWhole DEM 5044 -2.23 3.61 -0.11 0.46 0.47(without filter)W/O Road 3793 -2.23 3.61 -0.07 0.46 0.47(without filter)Whole DEM 5044 -2.16 1.84 -0.11 0.41 0.43(with filter)W/O Road 3793 -2.16 1.84 -0.1 0.41 0.43(with filter)
![Page 31: 1 Comparison of Surface Models Derived by Manual, LIDAR, and Softcopy Techniques UW-Madison NCRST-I Research Team Frank Scarpace, Alan Vonderohe, Teresa](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032704/56649d605503460f94a40d5f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
ConclusionsWhen Differenced with Manually-Derived Data, Softcopy Results (0.2-0.4m RMS) are Slightly Better than LIDAR (0.3-0.5m RMS).When LIDAR is Used as First Approximation for Softcopy, Results are Mixed with Improvements of 20% (to 0.16m RMS) in Some Cases.Slope Filter Improves Raw Softcopy Data by 10%.Comparisons with Manually-Edited Softcopy Remain to be Done.