1 brookhaven science associates nsls-to-nsls-ii beamline transition plan outline reasons, scope,...
TRANSCRIPT
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-to-NSLS-II beamline transition plan
Outline• Reasons, Scope, Criteria, Further input, Timeline• Transition plan, Beamline groupings• Evaluation of NSLS beamline productivity• Possible distribution of NSLS beamlines to move to NSLS-II• Beamline upgrade and moving costs• Possible bend magnet usage at NSLS-II• Schedule optimization, Issues
Steve HulbertExperimental Systems Division, NSLS
NSLS-II EFAC Meeting
May 10, 2007
2 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Reasons for Transferring Beamlines to NSLS-II
• User demand• Ensure significant capacity for NSLS-II at the
commencement of operation• Lehman review recommendation• EFAC recommendation
N.B.: DOE BES supports this initiative
3 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Scope and Criteria
Scope:• On the order of 20 beamlines• Primarily techniques with high demand and high productivity• Mainly occupy 3-pole wigglers, soft-bends, and large gap dipole (far-IR)• Certain endstations may go to insertion device beamlines
Criteria for “movability”:• Scientific productivity, measured by # of publications• Operational strength, measured by usage and user demand• Technical quality & compatibility of beamline hardware with NSLS-II
sources• Technical quality of endstation hardware• Consistent with NSLS-II scientific program planning
4 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS Beamline Transition Plan
1) Each of the existing beamlines at the NSLS, grouped by technique, was evaluated in terms of technical suitability for moving to a soft bend, a 3-pole wiggler, or an insertion device at NSLS-II.
2) Moving costs and costs associated with upgrading equipment to be suitable for NSLS-II were estimated (under the assumption that beamlines planned to be moved would be maintained at close to state-of-the-art in the interim).
3) The productivity (number of publications and premier publications) and user demand (hours requested) of the existing NSLS beamlines were evaluated.
4) From this list, and the technical and cost considerations, a suite of bending magnet beamlines were identified that would support the largest number of users with the greatest scientific impact.
5 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Beamline groupings used for movability exercise
Macromolecular Crystallography (Allaire, Berman, Stojanoff)X3A, X4A, X4C, X6A, X8C, X12B, X12C, X25, X26C, X29, X28C
Powder/Single Crystal Diffraction and High Pressure (Carr, Siddons, Zhong) X7B, X14A, X16C, X17B2, X17B3, X17C, U2A
Soft Condensed Matter (Pindak, DiMasi, Siddons, Yang)X6B, X9, X10A, X10B, X19C(liq.), X21, X22A, X22B, X27C
Hard Condensed Matter (Arena, Berman, Carr, Ehrlich, Hulbert, Nelson,Sanchez-Hanke, Vescovo)
U4B, U5UA, U12IR, U13UB, X1B, X13A, X17B1, X18A, X20C, X21, X22CX-ray Spectroscopy (Khalid, Ehrlich, Siddons)
X3B, X10C, X11A, X11B, X15B, X18B, X19A, X23A, X23B, X24AUV, VUV and Soft X-ray Spectroscopy (Arena, Hulbert, Vescovo)
U1A, U4A, U7A, U9B, U11, U12AImaging and Microprobes (Ablett, Arena, Evans-Lutterodt, Miller, Zhong)U2B, U10B, X1A1, X1A2, X2B, X13B, X15A, X19C(topo.), X20A, X26A, X27A
Others ([Keister], Berman, Miller, Siddons)U3C, X8A, X24C, X27B
red = Facility Beamline
6 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS Beamline Transition Plan
1) Each of the existing beamlines at the NSLS was evaluated in terms of technical suitability for moving to a soft bend, a 3-pole wiggler, or an insertion device at NSLS-II.
2) Moving costs and costs associated with upgrading equipment to be suitable for NSLS-II were estimated (under the assumption that beamlines planned to be moved would be maintained at close to state-of-the-art by the NSLS in the interim).
3) The productivity (number of publications and premier publications) and user demand (hours requested) of the existing NSLS beamlines were evaluated.
4) From this list, and the technical and cost considerations, a suite of bending magnet beamlines were identified that would support the largest number of users with the greatest scientific impact.
Movability exercise results: Nearly all operating NSLS beamlines
(Facility and PRT) were considered to have at least a portion of their
hardware worthy of moving to NSLS-II. Therefore, a greater degree of
selectivity was required…
7 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS Beamline Transition Plan
1) Each of the existing beamlines at the NSLS was evaluated in terms of technical suitability for moving to a soft bend, a 3-pole wiggler, or an insertion device at NSLS-II.
2) Moving costs and costs associated with upgrading equipment to be suitable for NSLS-II were estimated (under the assumption that beamlines planned to be moved would be maintained at close to state-of-the-art by the NSLS in the interim).
3) The productivity (number of publications and premier publications) and user demand (hours requested) of the existing NSLS beamlines were evaluated.
4) From this list, and the technical and cost considerations, a suite of bending magnet beamlines were identified that would support the largest number of users with the greatest scientific impact.
8 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Possible distribution of beamlines to be moved from NSLS to NSLS-II
PXEXAFS/NEXAFS SAXS
Powder diffraction
IR-spect roscopy Imaging
ARPES/PEEM
High-energy
X-ray scattering MCD
1st rank 2 3 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 02nd rank 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0Other 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 1Total 3 4 1 1 2 6 1 2 1 1
NSLS 2007 10 14 3 11 3 13 3 4 17 2
Total # movable beamlines = 22
• 20 to bends or 3-pole wigglers
• 2 to IDs (SCWs)
9 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS Beamline Transition plan
• 20 beamlines were identified, covering the following techniques:• EXAFS, SAXS, powder diffraction, scattering, PX, imaging,
microdiffraction, topography, far-IR spectroscopy, and DEI.• Cost includes:
• New optics req’d to match NSLS-II source and/or layout (mirrors, crystals, gratings)• Disassembly, moving and reassembly (based on recent X9-to-X3 move at NSLS)• Front end, First Optics Enclosure, PSS, and EPS at NSLS-II• Design support• Additional hardware (beampipes, cabling, windows and photon shutters).
• Does not include operating costs
Total moving cost = $45M (direct, FY07 dollars)
10 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Possible Bending Magnet Usage at NSLS-II1 large IR-BM2 soft BM3 std IR BM4 3-pole wiggler5 3-pole wiggler6 3-pole wiggler7 large IR-BM8 3-pole wiggler9 std IR BM
10 3-pole wiggler11 3-pole wiggler12 3-pole wiggler13 large IR-BM14 soft BM15 std IR BM16 3-pole wiggler17 soft BM18 soft BM19 large IR-BM20 3-pole wiggler21 std IR BM22 3-pole wiggler23 3-pole wiggler24 3-pole wiggler25 large IR-BM26 3-pole wiggler27 std IR BM28 3-pole wiggler29 3-pole wiggler30 3-pole wiggler
radiometryDEI, X-ray optics
topographyPX
far-IR microprobePX
mid-IR microprobe 2PX
tender-EXAFSsoft x-ray spectroscopy/NEXAFS
mid-IR, far-IR high Phard EXAFS
UVU CD hard EXAFS
microdiffractionhard x-ray full field imaging
Far-IR 2soft x-ray full field imaging
mid-IR imagingpowder diffraction
single crystal scatteringSXMCD
far-IR spectroscopySAXS
mid-IR microprobe-2microprobe
Magnetospectroscopy and time-resolved far-IROPEN
mid-IR microprobe-1R+D beamline “Beamline
types” in red are beamlines to be moved over from NSLS
Note: there is not always a 1:1 correspondence with beamlines at NSLS and NSLS-II. In some cases, equipment may be taken from multiple beamlines.
11 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Layout of X25 Beamline Moved to NSLS-II
Courtesy of Mary Carlucci-Dayton and Scott Coburn
monochromatormirror
FOE
hutch
possible ratchet door location for neighboring beamline
Radiation source is three-pole wiggler.
12 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Schedule optimization
• For each beamline group (by technique), develop a moving schedule which seeks to minimize any dip in the total (NSLS + NSLS-II) usage of the beamlines in that group during the transition period.
• Within technique groupings of the 20 to-be-moved beamlines, move those beamlines which need the least technical upgrade last. This will minimize the time span of the transition period.
• Ensure that NSLS users (both general and PRT users) are not unfairly impacted by interruptions in beamline operations associated with moving beamlines to NSLS-II. For example, NSLS should coordinate the integration of “displaced” users among the remaining beamlines of a given technique.
13 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Further input and timeline
Further input to be sought• Proposals from PRTs• User community, through NSLS UEC• NSLS SAC• NSLS-II EFACTimeline• Develop a strawman for discussion and planning purposes• Seek input and feedback on the plan from advisory committees, and
user community• Refine understanding of technical suitability of beamlines and/or
components• Develop a detailed plan to be endorsed by NSLS SAC and NSLS-II
EFAC• To be completed by summer 2008
14 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Issues
• Transfer of PRT beamlines• NSLS-II user access policy• Transition plan for these beamlines
• Coordination with NSLS-II project• Establish a task force with staff from NSLS and NSLS-II to
develop the beamline transition plan• NSLS-II considering hiring a BL Transition Manager (FY08)
• NSLS staffing• Impact on NSLS user programs