06/10/13 - response to 040913 us supreme court letter (stor-all)

40
LAUGH WITH THE WORLD! RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES’ RETURN OF PETITIONER’S APRIL 1, 2013 PLEADING(S) STOR-ALL ALFRED MATTER REQUEST TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANY/ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST UNDERSTANDING WHY FOREIGN NATIONS/LEADERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO EXTRADITE WHISTLEBLOWERS AS EDWARD SNOWDEN (i.e. Known for the National Security Agency [NSA] Scandal) and WIKILEAKS’ JULIAN ASSANGE to the United States of America’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM - - because it is TAINTED/CORRUPT and CONTROLLED BY TERRORISTS/WHITE SUPREMACISTS! YES - - United States of America’s PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, CONGRESS and SUPREME COURT along with their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz possess KNOWLEDGE and appears are the MAJOR PLAYERS in the United States of America’s COVER-UP of its Government Officials’/Lawyers’ CORRUPTION, CRIMINAL and CIVIL/HUMAN Rights VIOLATIONS!

Upload: vogeldenise

Post on 10-May-2015

440 views

Category:

News & Politics


0 download

DESCRIPTION

We are working on getting this document translated in multiple languages due to overwhelming INTERNATIONAL interests. Please be patient and feel free to check back for other translations.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

LAUGH WITH THE WORLD!

RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES’ RETURN OF

PETITIONER’S APRIL 1, 2013 PLEADING(S) –

STOR-ALL ALFRED MATTER

REQUEST TO BE NOTIFIED OF ANY/ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

UNDERSTANDING WHY FOREIGN NATIONS/LEADERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO

EXTRADITE WHISTLEBLOWERS AS EDWARD SNOWDEN (i.e. Known for the National Security Agency

[NSA] Scandal) and WIKILEAKS’ JULIAN ASSANGE to the United States of America’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM - - because

it is TAINTED/CORRUPT and CONTROLLED BY TERRORISTS/WHITE SUPREMACISTS!

YES - - United States of America’s PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, CONGRESS and

SUPREME COURT along with their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz

possess KNOWLEDGE and appears are the MAJOR PLAYERS in the United States of America’s COVER-UP of its

Government Officials’/Lawyers’ CORRUPTION, CRIMINAL and CIVIL/HUMAN Rights VIOLATIONS!

Page 2: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS

U.S. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

DELIVERY CONFIRMATIONS

Page 3: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)
Page 4: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 1 of 36

No. _____________________________________

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME

PETITIONER

V.

STOR-ALL ALFRED, LLC;

JUDGE JOHN ANDREW WEST/

HAMILTON COUNTY (OHIO) COURT OF COMMON PLEAS; AND

DOES 1 THROUGH 250

RESPONDENT(S)

RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES’ RETURN OF

PETITIONER’S APRIL 1, 2013 PLEADING(S) – REQUEST TO BE NOTIFIED OF

ANY/ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST1

COMES NOW Petitioner, Vogel Denise Newsome – a/k/a Denise V. Newsome (“Newsome”

and/or “Petitioner Newsome”) – WITHOUT WAIVING HER RIGHTS and ARGUMENTS/ISSUES

and DEFENSES raised and/or set forth in the October 9, 2010 “Emergency Motion to Stay; Emergency

Motion for Enlargement of Time and Other Relief The United States Supreme Court Deems Appropriate

To Correct The Legal Wrongs/Injustices Reported Herein” (“EM/ORS”)

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/100910-emergency-motion

as well as subsequent pleadings/submittals – i.e. wherein Newsome TIMELY, PROPERLY and

ADEQUATELY demanded that the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States STEP DOWN

IMMEDIATELY! http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/071811-ltr-sctjusticerobertssuter

This instant filing entitled,

RESPONSE TO SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES’ RETURN

OF PETITIONER’S APRIL 1, 2013 PLEADING(S) – REQUEST TO BE

NOTIFIED OF ANY/ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

(response known as “040113RESPONSE-USSCtRETURN”) is in response to this Court’s return of the

April 1, 2013, pleading – i.e. for cost sufficient purposes as required by the Rule(s) of this Court, a copy

1 BOLDFACE, ITALICS, UNDERLINE, CAPS/Small Caps, Font Coloring, Highlighting, etc. added for emphasis.

Page 5: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 2 of 36

may be obtained at http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/040113-response-to-return-of-010413-

pleading-storall in accordance with the Rules of this Court and for cost efficient purposes.

PLEASE NOTE: The 040113RESPONSE-USSCtRETURN document(s) was NOT

STAMPED “RECEIVED” as customarily done with documents received by this Court in the past.

Newsome gathers such NEGLIGENCE to stamp may be further efforts by this Court NOT to

comply with its practices although it has KNOWLEDGE of the

PUBLIC/INTERNATIONAL/GLOBAL interest in this lawsuit. Moreover, the concerns of this

Court NOT wanting to be LAUGHED at for its STUPIDITY in the

handling of this matter – i.e. NOW that there is an INTERNATIONAL

INTEREST!

Nevertheless, this instant filing is submitted in GOOD FAITH and in support thereof, Newsome states:

1) FIRST and FOREMOST, Newsome has REPEATEDLY requested that this Court

advise her of any/all CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST in its handling of this case. To

date, this Court continues to DANCE AROUND and/or attempts to EVADE making

KNOWN to Newsome the CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST known to it which appears

PRECLUDE the Justices of this Court and/or this Court’s Administrative Staffs’

handling of this matter; however, does NOT preclude the filing of this instant pleading

nor previous pleadings that were submitted for filing by Newsome. Therefore, through

this INSTANT filing, Newsome CONTINUES to DEMAND and REITERATES to be

Page 6: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 3 of 36

notified of any/all CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST in its handling of the ORIGINAL

Lawsuit she seeks to bring pursuant to Rule 17 of the Supreme Court of the

United States and other laws of the United States of America governing said matters. PLEASE NOTE: This lawsuit involves matters of

PUBLIC/INTERNATIONAL INTERESTS and appears to have

CAPTURED the attention of Attorneys/Lawyers/Lawmakers in

INTERNATIONAL Communities as well as individuals who are

familiar with the laws NOT only in their respective countries/nations

but here in the United States of America. CLEARLY the

Public/Foreign Nations are seeing for themselves the CORRUPTION

and CRIMINAL practices of the SO-CALLED most-powerful country

in the wake of its DEMISE!

2) This instant “040113RESPONSE-USSCtRETURN” is submitted in good faith and is

not submitted for purposes of delay, harassment, hindering proceedings, embarrassment,

obstructing the administration of justice, vexatious litigation, increasing the cost of

litigation, etc. and is filed to protect and preserve the ISSUES and rights of

Newsome secured/guaranteed under the United States of America’s

Constitution and other laws of the United States of America. Moreover,

to address matters of PUBLIC/GLOBAL/ INTERNATIONAL

importance and interests.

3) That the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States of America were

TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY demanded to

“STEP DOWN” by Friday, July 22, 2011;

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/071811-ltr-sctjusticerobertssuter

however, to date still remain on the bench with KNOWLEDGE of the CRIMINAL acts

they have committed and CONTINUE to commit not ONLY against

Newsome but the PUBLIC-AT-LARGE through their

CORRUPTION and DECEPTIVE practices to

HIDE/CONCEAL the criminal/civil wrongs of their Legal

Counsel/Advisor and CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS

Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz (“Baker

Donelson”) – i.e. and Baker Donelson Clients such as United States of America

PRESIDENT Barack Obama, United States of America CONGRESSIONAL

Members, JUDICIAL Branch Members as the Justices of this Court, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company/Stor-All Alfred, etc.

Page 7: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 4 of 36

Page 8: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 5 of 36

IMPORTANT TO NOTE:

AFTER SEVERAL YEARS of posting the above information on

Martindale Hubbell,

it appears Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz moved

SWIFTLY to have information SCRUBBED from the Martindale

Hubbell Website about March/April 2010 – i.e.

COINCIDENTALLY AFTER Newsome’s Release of the

Page 9: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 6 of 36

PowerPoint Presentation entitled, “NOVEMBER 2010/2012

ELECTIONS:”

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/03-2010-power-point-november-2010-elections

The IRS Scandal and OTHER Scandals coming to

light are attempts to keep the PUBLIC/WORLD ignorant of the fact that

it was Newsome (i.e. and NOT the Tea Party, etc.) who

REPEATEDLY brought such CRIMINAL and

UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL practices of CORRUPT Government

Officials to the proper Government Entities’/Officials’ attention through

her COMPLAINTS, correspondence, emails, facsimiles, etc. that

contain sufficient and adequate information as to HOW EARLY such

concerns were made known and/or made a matter a PUBLIC record.

Therefore, it is worthy to make note, that the EXPOSURE of

SCANDALS coming to light is merely a PRELUDE to the

SETTING-OF-THE-STAGE for a BACKDOOR-

IMPEACHMENT of United States of America President

Barack Obama and attempts to POSITION United States

KENTUCKY Senator Rand Paul (i.e. who appears to be a

RACIST Tea Party Member) for the 2016 Presidential

Elections:

Page 10: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 7 of 36

Just as the Obama Administration’s Internal Revenue Service

Steve Miller ADMITTED to the PLANTING of

QUESTIONS asked contributing to the EXPOSURE of the

IRS’ Criminal Activities, such information is

pertinent/relevant for the PUBLIC/WORLD to see how

PUPPETMASTERS as Baker Donelson and its

CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS are going about

OBSTRUCTING the Administration of Justice and engaging

in CRIMINAL/FRAUDULENT practices in attempts to

COVER-UP the CONSPIRACIES, CORRUPTION and

CRIMINAL/CIVIL violations of Government Officials and

their Legal Counsel/Attorneys. Newsome’s document

entitled, “READ MY LIPS:” http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/obama-read-my-lips-obama-

fraudgate-for-translation

Page 11: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 8 of 36

provides ADDITIONAL information into the

FRAUDULENT practices of Baker Donelson and how it

appears this law firm HIJACKED the United States of

America’s Government and used access to Government

positions to PROMOTE their WHITE SUPREMACY

Agenda which has successfully brought about the DEMISE

and COLLAPSE of the United States of America.

Page 12: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 9 of 36

EMPHASIS ADDED to marked positions as follows

for TRANSLATION purposes:

CHIEF OF STAFF to the President of the

United States

Members of the United States Senate

Members of the United States House of

Representatives

Director of the Administrative Office of the

United States Courts

CHIEF OF STAFF of the Supreme Court of

the United States

ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT to the

CHIEF JUSTICE of the United States

United States Circuit Court of Appeals Judge

United States District Court Judges

Page 13: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 10 of 36

PLEASE NOTE WHY THIS IS A MATTER OF

PUBLIC/INTERNATIONAL INTEREST: As a matter of

law, this information is relevant and/or pertinent to those who

may be seeking to CHALLENGE any

DECISIONS and/or matters “INFRINGING UPON

THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS and other RIGHTS”

SIGNED into Law by President Barack Obama (i.e. who it

appears under the 25th Amendment of the United States

Constitution is NOT Legally/Lawfully in office – therefore,

any/all laws and/or documents EXECUTED by Barack

Obama and/or his Administration as well as Congressional

Members during the Obama Administration CAN be

CHALLENGED!) and CONGRESSIONAL Members as

well as DECISIONS by the Supreme Court of the United

States NOW have LEGAL GROUNDS to

CHALLENGE the LEGALITY of any/all

decisions NOT only from this Court but that of the

United States of America’s EXECUTIVE Branch/White

House, LEGISLATIVE Branch/Congress and JUDICIAL

Branch/Supreme Court of the United States.

WHY THIS INFORMATION IS PERTINENT/

RELEVANT: It appears from record evidence as well as

information that may be obtained through RESEARCH, that

the APPOINTMENT(S) of Supreme Court of the United

States Justices to the High Court and other courts has been

COMPROMISED due to CONFLICTS-OF-INTEREST

and the MAJOR/KEY Role the Law Firm Baker Donelson

Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz (“Baker Donelson”) has

played in the INFLUENCE and APPOINTMENT of

Justices to this Court and lower courts as well as the

DECISIONS handed down by this Court and lower courts. There is RECORD evidence to support the

NEXUS/RELATIONSHIP of Baker Donelson – i.e. legal

counsel for the JUSTICES of the Supreme Court of the

United States, legal counsel for PRESIDENT Barack

Obama and his Administration and legal counsel for

CONGRESSIONAL Members. There is RECORD

EVIDENCE to support NEXUS/RELATIONSHIP of Baker

Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz in this instant

matter as well as a PATTERN-OF-PRACTICE and its

MAJOR/KEY ROLE in any/all legal matters involving

Vogel Denise Newsome (i.e. Petitioner in this instant lawsuit).

Page 14: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 11 of 36

4) The April 9, 2013, Supreme Court of the United States’ letter states in part:

The enclosed documents were received on April 9,

2013. These papers fail to comply with the Rules of this

Court and are herewith returned.

You may seek review of a decision only by filing a

timely petition for writ of certiorari. The papers you

submitted are not construed to be a petition for writ

of certiorari. Should you choose to file a petition for

writ of certiorari, you must submit the petition within

the 90 day time limit allowed under Rule 13 of the

Rules of this Court. A Copy of the Rules of this

Court and a sample petition for a writ of certiorari

are enclosed.

Your case must first be reviewed by a United States

court of appeals or by the highest state court in

which a decision could be had. 28 USC 1254 and

1257.

RESPONSE: The April 9, 2013, letter from this Court does NOT state

WHICH Rule(s) (if any) that Newsome’s April 1, 2013 pleading(s) fail to comply with. Newsome’s April 1, 2013 pleading(s) CLEARLY states that filing is in RESPONSE

to this Court’s letter received. Therefore, Newsome’s pleading is in the FORMAT

and COMPLIANT with “APPLICATIONS to INDIVIDUAL Justices” pursuant to

Rule 22 of the Supreme Court of the United States which states in part:

As of June 1, 2013, CUT and PASTED from:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/ctrules/2013RulesoftheCourt.pdf

Rule 22. Applications to Individual Justices 1. An application addressed to an individual Justice shall be filed with

the Clerk, who will transmit it promptly to the Justice concerned if an

individual Justice has authority to grant the sought relief.

2. The original and two copies of any application addressed to an

individual Justice shall be prepared as required by Rule 33.2, and shall

be accompanied by proof of service as required by Rule 29. . . .

Newsome believes that her Responses to this Court’s correspondence have been submitted in

Compliance with Rule 33.2, which states in part:

2. 81⁄2 – by 11-Inch Paper Format: (a) The text of every document,

including any appendix thereto, expressly permitted by these Rules to be

presented to the Court on 81⁄2 -by 11-inch paper shall appear double

spaced, except for indented quotations, which shall be single spaced,

on opaque, unglazed, white paper. The document shall be stapled or

bound at the upper left-hand corner. Copies, if required, shall be

produced on the same type of paper and shall be legible.

Page 15: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 12 of 36

Furthermore, the record evidence will support that Newsome’s April 1, 2013 Response as

well as prior responses have been APPLICATIONS made to an INDIVIDUAL Justice -

Chief Justice John G. Roberts:

Page 16: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 13 of 36

Nevertheless, it appears the Clerk’s Office (William K. Suter and his

SIDEKICK/Redmond K. Barnes) are not only acting in VIOLATION of the

Rules of this Court, but the United States of America’s Constitution and other

laws of the United States of America in the handling of this matter for purposes

of OBSTRUCTING Justice and COVERING UP the Criminal Activities of the

Justices of this Court and Staff Members.

The record evidence will SUPPORT/SUSTAIN Newsome has TIMELY

initiated an ORIGINAL Action/Lawsuit pursuant to Rule 17 of the Supreme

Court of the United States as well as REPEATEDLY provided her Petition(s)

for EXTRAORDINARY WRIT(S) pursuant to Rule 20 of the Supreme Court

of the United States and other statutes/laws of the United States of America

governing said matters. In fact, the record evidence will support that this Court

received Newsome’s TIMELY submitted:

PETITION(S) FOR: ORIGINAL WRIT – WRIT OF CONSPIRACY –

WRIT OF COURSE – WRIT OF DETINUE – WRIT OF ENTRY -

WRIT OF EXIGI FACIAS - WRIT OF FORMEDON - WRIT OF

INJUNCTION - WRIT OF MANDAMUS - WRIT OF POSSESSION -

WRIT OF PRAECIPE - WRIT OF PROTECTION - WRIT OF

RECAPTION - WRIT OF PROHIBITION - WRIT OF REVIEW -

WRIT OF SUPERSEDEAS - WRIT OF SUPERVISORY CONTROL -

WRIT OF SECURITATE PACIS - EXTRATERRITORIAL WRITS

on or about November 5, 2012, and/or about January 4, 2013, provided

this Court with her pleading entitled:

RESPONSE TO NOVEMBER 5, 2012 SUPREME

COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DOCUMENTS

RECEIVED- REQUEST FOR AN ANSWER

REGARDING WHAT IT IS THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOES NOT

UNDERSTAND REGARDING VOGEL DENISE

NEWSOMES PETITION(S) FOR: ORIGINAL WRIT-

Page 17: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 14 of 36

WRIT OF CONSPIRACY- WRIT OF COURSE- WRIT

OF DETINUE- WRIT OF ENTRY- WRIT OF EXIGI

FACIAS- WRIT OF FORMEDON- WRIT OF

INJUNCTION - WRIT OF MANDAMUS - WRIT OF

POSSESSION- WRIT OF PRAECIPE - WRIT OF

PROTECTION - WRIT OF RECAPTION - WRIT OF

PROHIBITION - WRIT OF REVIEW - WRIT OF

SUPERSEDEAS- WRIT OF SUPERVISORY

CONTROL- WRIT OF SECURITATE PACIS - EXTRA

TERRITORIAL WRITS - AFFIDAVIT TO SUPPORT

COMPLIANCE WITH SUPREME COURT FILING

REQUIREMENTS- REQUEST TO BE NOTIFIED OF

ANY/ALL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/010413-response-to-110512-us-

supreme-court-documents-returned; however, to date this Court

REFUSES to set forth the DEFICIENCIES (if any) with said

pleading although Newsome TIMELY, PROPERLY and

ADEQUATELY demanded from this Court through her April 1,

2013 pleading, that she be provided with deficiencies (if any)

pursuant to the Rules of Supreme Court of the United States.

The record evidence will support that Newsome’s EXTRAORDINARY

Writ(s) set forth the Lower High Court (Ohio Supreme Court) and rulings from

said Court have been provided through said Petition – i.e. while such information

is NOT relevant and/or is NOT required since the instant lawsuit sought to be

brought is an ORIGINAL action pursuant to Rule 17 of the

Supreme Court of the United States. Newsome’s November 5, 2012, pleading

received by this Court further supports that document contains the required proof

of service – i.e. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE – on opposing party(s)/counsel.

Page 18: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 15 of 36

While this Court’s letter dated April 9, 2013 (EXHIBIT “A”) states:

A Copy of the Rules of this Court and a sample

petition for a writ of certiorari are enclosed.

Page 19: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 16 of 36

This Court FAILED to provide Newsome with a “Copy of the Rules” of this Court as well

as “a SAMPLE Petition” of a writ of certiorari – i.e. while there is RECORD EVIDENCE

that this Court has before it EXTRAORDINARY WRITS other than Writ of Certiorari in its

possession; nevertheless, selects a writ of certiorari rather than provide Newsome with a

SAMPLE of other Extraordinary Writs (as Writ of Injunction, Writ of Protection, Writ of

Supersedeas, etc) that has been filed with this Court.

5) No, it appears, the IRS Scandal and OTHER Scandals coming to light are

merely a PRELUDE to the SETTING-OF-THE-STAGE for a

BACKDOOR-IMPEACHMENT of United States of America President

Barack Obama:

YES, the United States of America’s GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION is

MUCH MORE WIDESPREAD than the Internal Revenue Service as this

instant ORIGINAL action sought to be brought by Vogel Denise Newsome has shed light on

and will CONTINUE to EXPOSE the DEEP-ROOTED Racism and Criminal/Civil

Violations of Members of United States of America’s EXECUTIVE Branch,

LEGISLATIVE Branch, JUDICIAL Branch and their Lawyers/Attorneys as Baker

Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz.

Page 20: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 17 of 36

PLEASE NOTE: Failure by this Court to handle Newsome’s

pleadings in ACCORDANCE to the Rules of this Court has REPEATEDLY

INFRINGED upon her CONSTITUTIONAL Rights as well as other RIGHTS secured

under the laws of the United States of America.

Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Scandal – i.e. appears to be

BIRTHED from Newsome’s EXPOSURE of the CORRUPTION

and CRIMINAL activities of the United States Department of the

TREASURY as well as the United States Department of

JUSTICE! In fact, it appears that United States of America President

Barack Obama’s Administration (White House and Department of

Justice) learning of the issue Petitioner Newsome was having with the

Kentucky Department of Revenue (Thomas B. Miller) through her

August 12, 2009 response entitled, CORRESPONDENCE

TO KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THOMAS B.

MILLER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC

HOLDER AND A COPY TO PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA

PROVIDING THEM WITH REBUTTAL KENTUCKY

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ISSUE:

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/081209-letter-

kydormillerholderobamaproofofmailing

in RETALIATION to Newsome’s July 13, 2010 email entitled, “U.S.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: THE DOWNFALL/DOOM OF

THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION - Corruption/Conspiracy/

Cover-Up/Criminal Acts Made Public” to President Barack Obama

and provided to other CONGRESSSIONAL Members as well

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/071310-email-toobamaholder

The attachments to the following email may be obtained at:

https://secure.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8a7169885f636fada9

Page 21: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 18 of 36

CONSPIRED with the Kentucky Department of Revenue’s Thomas

B. Miller and TOP/KEY Clients of Baker Donelson Bearman

Caldwell & Bekowitz as J.P. Morgan Chase to come AFTER

Newsome’s bank accounts for CHILD SUPPORT – i.e. when

Newsome has NEVER birthed, adopted nor aborted child(ren) to

warrant such ATTACKS against her. Neither was a COURT ORDER

issued support the action(s) taken AGAINST Newsome:

JP Morgan Chase Bank is a TOP/KEY Client of Baker Donelson

JP Morgan Chase Bank is President Barack Obama’s Bank/Banker

https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obamas-relationship-with-

jp-morgan-chase-bank

NEXUS/RELATIONSHIP was used for purposes of engaging in

CRMINAL and CIVIL violations AGAINST Petitioner Newsome and

in RETALIATION for Newsome’s REPORTING of Criminal and

Civil violations of United States of America President Barack Obama

and his Administration.

President Barack Obama relying upon his Legal Counsel Baker

Donelson’s RUNNING/CONTROL of the White House and United

States Department of the Treasury to engage in CRIMINAL acts

which resulted in the THEFT and EMBEZZLEMENT of monies in

Newsome’s bank account(s):

Page 22: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 19 of 36

Associated Press (“AP”) Scandal – i.e. appears BIRTHED from

what appears to be the United States of America’s Federal Bureau of

Investigation’s/Central Intelligence Agency’s TERRORIST Plan to

bring down a Jetliner which News coverage began to surface about

May 7, 2012; however; it appears the United States of

America’s TERRORIST Plot to bring down the Jetliner

allegedly bound for the United States was SCRAPPED AFTER

Newsome’s EXPOSURE of the United States of America’s

CORRUPT Government Officials and their Legal Counsel Baker

Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz’

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/092812-david-addington-article-english

PLANNING and CARRYING OUT the September 11, 2001

DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade

Center Towers and other targets through her April 30, 2012, “OFFICIAL COMPLAINT/CHARGE OF DISCRIMINATION

FILED OF AND AGAINST THE GARRETSON FIRM

RESOLUTION GROUP INC. AND/OR MESSINA

STAFFING/MESSINA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS WITH

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - UNITED

STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION – CINCINNATI AREA OFFICE and OHIO CIVIL

RIGHTS COMMISSION – CENTRAL OFFICE; AND REQUEST

FOR COMMISSIONER CHARGE TO BE ISSUED SUBMITTED

FOR FILING ON APRIL 30, 2012” - i.e. which was posted about May

2, 2012:

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/043012-eeoc-ocrc-

complaintcharge

Page 23: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 20 of 36

which it appears led to the United States of America’s

“PULLING-THE-PLUG” on its PLANS to bring down the

Jetlinder bound for the United States:

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/cia-foiled-plane-plot-2

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/cia-foiled-plane-bomb

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obama-may-2012-

foiled-plane-plot

Now it appears the President Obama’s Administration and Lawyer

Baker Donelson are attempting to blame the Associated Press for

being the reason for botching the plans of the United States of

America to bring down ANOTHER plane in

MAY 2012 and was going to BLAME this on one of its

TERRORIST CELLS in the BOMBING of another plane – i.e. in that

it appears the Obama Administration and its legal counsel Baker

Donelson may have been behind the BOMBING and/or

TERRORIST acts in the crash on or about February 12, 2009, which

carried Beverly Ekert – i.e. the wife of a 911 victim killed in the 2001

World Trade Center bombings, who had met with President Barack

Obama days earlier and reports allege she REFUSED to be

BRIBED and/or bought out and was DETERMINED to get to the

TRUTH behind the DOMESTIC Terrorist Acts of September 11,

2001:

Page 24: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 21 of 36

Then approximately TWO months later the downing of the attorney’s

(Michael H. Doran) plane who was legal counsel to 911 victim(s):

Page 25: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 22 of 36

Newsome laughs because the record evidence will support that it

appears the United States of America’s Government

Agencies’/Officials’ Legal Counsel REPEATEDLY RELIED upon

its TIES/CONNECTIONS and RELATIONSHIPS to the

Government and TELECOMMUNICATION Companies (i.e. as

AT&T, Verizon and Sprint, etc.) to HACK into Customer

Accounts; moreover, Telecommunication Companies ALLOWING

“THIRD-PARTY Access” such as Baker Donelson and

Government Agencies UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL access to

customers’ accounts for purposes of TRACKING them as well as

seeing who they were communicating with. Additional investigations

are yielding that the AP Scandal REACHES FAR BEYOND the

Associated Press and such CRIMINAL and UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL

practices are used on Newsome for purposes of

TRACKING/STALKING her and contacting employers for purposes

of having Newsome’s employment TERMINATED to

preclude/prevent her from submitting court filings as this instant

pleading. Acts in FURTHERANCE of the CONSPIRACIES leveled

against Newsome. Newsome LAUGHS because she knows from

the FEEDBACK she receives that information shared in her Social

Forums and/or website provides CREDIBLE information and that

from her PATTERN-OF-PRACTICES of Baker Donelson and its

CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS they were going to FALL

and provide ADDITIONAL evidence to support Newsome’s claims.

Therefore, Newsome POSTING information in that

documents/materials are DATED to support when information is

POSTED – i.e. so it cannot be said that information was released

AFTER the fact. For instance, Newsome’s POSTING regarding the

Baker Donelson NEXUS/CONNECTION with Telecommunication

GIANTS as Verizon, AT&T and Sprint for instant were posted on or

about June 7, 2012:

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-

att-insurance-universal-health

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-

donelsonlabor-employment-telecommunications

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/baker-donelson-

verizon

Page 26: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 23 of 36

Such CRIMINAL HACKING Scandal that NOT only reaches

Telecommunication Companies but appears Baker Donelson and the

United States of America’s Government relies upon the Baker

Donelson connections/relationships with PRIVATE

Employers as ADECCO to UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY

Stalk Citizens and HACK into their accounts (as

Newsome’s) and “CHANGING PIN” for purposes of

determining WHERE she is working and HOW much she is

earning. Then proceed to have those with whom they are

TARGETING employment TERMINATED for purposes of

FINANCIALLY devastating and precluding/depriving them with a

means of livelihood – life, liberties and pursuit of happiness, etc.

For instance, from RESEARCH in the ADECCO hacking matter,

Newsome was able to ESTABLISH a CONNECTION/

RELATIONSHIP between ADECCO and Baker Donelson’s

TOP/KEY Client JP MORGAN CHASE BANK/JAMIE DIMON who

just happens to be United States of America’s President Barack

Obama’s Bank/Banker.

Page 27: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 24 of 36

HACKING into Newsome’s ADECCO Account on or about

January 4, 2013:

Coming approximately 12 days AFTER Newsome’s

December 23, 2012 FACSIMILE entitled:

ObamaFraudGate – BENGHAZI COVER-UP

STATUS Of EEOC COMPLAINT: Newsome vs.

The Garretson Firm Resolution Group/Messina

Staffing – BACK WAGES DEMANDED – By

THURSDAY, January 10, 2013

to United States of America President Barack Obama

DEMANDING Back Wages:

Page 28: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 25 of 36

The record evidence will support that United States of

America President Barack Obama was TIMELY,

PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY NOTIFIED via

FACSIMILE of what appears to be his Administration’s

and/or Legal Counsel Baker Donelson’s HACKING into

Newsome’s Account.

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/010613-obama-fax-

confirmation-adecco-notification-of-compromiseto-e-payoll-

account

IMPORTANT TO NOTE: Newsome’s

ADECCO Account was the ONLY Account

HACKED. This was NOT WIDESPREAD!

President Barack Obama wanted OPEN

GOVERNMENT – so here we GO!

Page 29: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 26 of 36

REITERATED FOR TRANSLATION PURPOSES:

United States of America President Barack Obama, while it

appears that you and your Administration are using

TAXPAYER’S DOLLARS to STALK Vogel Denise Newsome and DETERMINE where she is working so that you all can

CONTINUE in your CRIMINAL/UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL

practices in contacting her employers to have her

TERMINATED and to keep her from SHARING this

information, the THURSDAY, January 10, 2013 DEADLINE

presented in the DECEMBER 13, 2012 Facsimile

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/122312-obama-fax-

english

requesting BACK WAGES in the amount of approximately

$39,640 is approaching. Hopefully, your time will be better spent

seeing to it that Newsome obtain these BACK WAGES and

PACKING YOUR BAGS to leave the White House!

Benghazi Attack Scandal – i.e. FAILED Attempts to BLAME on

Muslim Video PAID for and FINANCED with JEWISH Support

Page 30: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 27 of 36

It appears that AFTER Newsome’s EXPOSURE of the “HILLARY

CLINTON STINGERS” presentation released by Newsome on or

about August 21, 2012:

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/082112-hillary-clinton-dealing-

with-the-united-states-of-americas-stingers

said release SQUASHED the PLANS of President Barack Obama

and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell and and

their CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS to have United States

of America’s Ambassador Christopher Stephens KIDNAPPED and

held in EXCHANGE for the Muslim Brotherhood’s Blind Sheik

Page 31: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 28 of 36

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obama-benghazi-coverup-

presentation-to-western-center-news-coverage

Boston Marathon Bombing Scandal/FRAMING of INNOCENT

People (i.e. Muslims). Thanks to the OVER-KILL Media coverage

and information RELEASED by the Government Agencies,

Newsome believes there is SUFFICIENT evidence to support what

appears to be the FRAMING of Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev for

the Boston Marathon Bombing – i.e. which clearly appears to be the

ANOTHER United States of America’s DOMESTIC Terrorist Attack

by agencies as the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central

Intelligence Agency TARGETING and FRAMING members of the

MUSLIM Communities for their CRIMINAL acts

Page 32: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 29 of 36

as done in the 1993 World Trade Center Bombings where it appears

the United States of America’s Government was INVOLVED in the

PLANNING and CARRYING out of those attacks as well.

The 1993 Bombing Attacks were BLAMED on the Muslim

Brotherhood’s Blind Sheik:

Page 33: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 30 of 36

IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The SAME Blind Sheik

that from reports appears President Barack Obama and

his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson had PLANNED to

have United States of America’s Ambassador

KIDNAPPED for on September 11, 2012, in the

Benghazi Attacks so they could WORK-OUT-A-

HOSTAGE-NEGOTIATION EXCHANGE to provide

Ambassador Stephens for the Muslim Brotherhood’s

Blind Sheik:

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/barack-obama-benghazi-coverup-

presentation-to-western-center-news-coverage

RICIN Scandal – BIRTHED on or about April 16, 2013, COINCIDENTALLY one week AFTER the Supreme Court

of the United States April 9, 2013, receipt of Newsome’s April 1,

2013 pleading(s). Coincidentally, FIRST allegedly targeting United

States MISSISSIPPI Senator (Roger Wicker) and United States

Page 34: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 31 of 36

President Barack Obama. Coincidentally, a SUSPICIOUS package

is received at the CINCINNATI, Ohio location in the vicinity where

Newsome receives her mail. Clearly what appears to be a

SUBLIMINAL message sent to Newsome by the Obama

Administration for purposes of THREATS/INTIMIDATION and

efforts to get her to back down from EXPOSING the

CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL activities of the United States of

America’s HEADS-OF-STATE and CORRUPT Congressional

Members, CORRUPT Justices/Judges and their

CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS:

http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/suspicious-package-cincinnati-ohio-week-that-ricin-

scandal-broke

Attempts were made by the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/Federal

Bureau of Investigation/Central Intelligence Agency to FRAME

an INNOCENT Mississippi Man (Paul Kevin Curtis - i.e. who

claims to be an ACTIVIST and post in his social forum the following

quote: “To see a wrong and not expose it is to become a silent

partner to its continuance."

Page 35: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 32 of 36

United States of America’s own DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks on

9/11/2001 of the WORLD TRADE CENTER Bombings and other

Attacks

Supreme Court of the United States Scandal

United States of America CONGRESSIONAL Scandal

The listing goes on-and-on. . . .

The CONSEQUENCES of FAILURE TO

ACT – i.e. the laws of the United States of America CLEARLY supports that when

criminals (i.e. as CORRUPT Government Officials in the United States of America’s

EXECUTIVE Branch, LEGISLATIVE Branch and JUDICIAL Branch) are NOT

stopped when their crimes are TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY brought

to the appropriate Government Agencies’ attention, these CRIMINALS go on to

COMMIT more HIDEOUS crimes. For instance, it appears from the record evidence

as well as from evidence obtained through RESEARCH and are matters of PUBLIC

interests/records, FAILURE to act upon Newsome’s as well as other CONCERNED

Citizens’ Complaints has LED to the MAJOR/KEY Role of the United States of

America’s CORRUPT Government Officials/Heads of State have PLAYED in the

GLOBAL/INTERNATIONAL Economic and FINANCIAL demise of NOT only the

United States of America but Countries/Nations abroad. Moreover, LEADING to the

WARS and CIVIL unrest in regions such as the MIDDLE EAST!

6) The record evidence will further support that through this Court’s April 9, 2013,

correspondence (i.e. attached as EXHIBIT “A” to this instant pleading), its

CONTINUED FAILURE to provide Newsome with the DEFICIENCIES with the

Petition(s) for Extraordinary Writs, is clearly an OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE and

PRECLUDES her from making the necessary changes (if any are really needed)

because, according to her, she believes that said Pleading was REDONE with the

REQUIRED CORRECTIONS in accordance with the Rules of the Court. However,

WITHOUT a letter from this Court in COMPLIANCE with Rule 14.5, it is both

unlawful and unethical for this Court to REFUSE to file Petition(s); moreover, FAIL to

provide Newsome with a list of deficiencies (if any).

PLEASE NOTE: This Court’s review of Newsome’s CORRECTED Petitions

in this instant lawsuit will support that with each filing CHANGES/CORRECTIONS

were made; however, this Court CONTINUES to fail to DISTINCTLY INDICATE

deficiency(s) – if any! Therefore, in compliance with the Rules of this Court and in

good-faith efforts to mitigate costs, Newsome is PRECLUDED from making the

necessary corrections and having booklets produced because this Court has FAILED to

comply with its OWN Rules in the handling of this matter which clearly OBSTRUCTS

JUSTICE and these proceedings.

7) Newsome having concerns that the DILIATORY actions of this Court are BAD FAITH

actions for purposes of INCREASING COSTS as well as AIDING and ABETTING in

the CRIMINAL and CIVIL WRONGS of United States of America President Barack

Obama and his Legal Counsel/Attorneys Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &

Berkowitz and their interest in this lawsuit as well as that of the United States of

Page 36: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 33 of 36

America’s CONGRESS’ interest and the Supreme Court of the United States’

PERSONAL and FINANCIAL interest in the outcome of this lawsuit.

8) Newsome further believes that a reasonable mind may conclude that the DILATORY

practices by the Supreme Court of the United States is in FURTHERANCE of the

MAJOR/KEY ROLES played in the CONSPIRACIES leveled against Newsome and

the use of such time by this Court and its Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman

Caldwell & Berkowitz who also represents United States President Barack

Obama/Executive Branch Members, United States Congressional Members and Liberty

Mutual Insurance Company – i.e. whose Client(s) is party to this instant lawsuit – to

keep Newsome’s LAWSUIT and pleadings from being filed.

Moreover, that such DILATORY practices by this Court have been used for the

PURPOSES of AIDING and ABETTING its Legal Counsel (Baker Donelson) and

President Barack Obama’s Administration in the CRIMINAL STALKING of

Newsome and HACKING into her employer’s accounts and/or

TELECOMMUNICATION Company records to determine where Newsome is working

for purposes of getting her employment TERMINATED and FINANCIALLY

devastating her to PRECLUDE/OBSTRUCT her from bringing this lawsuit which

CLEARLY is a matter of PUBLIC IMPORTANCE as well as has gained

GLOBAL/INTERNATIONAL interest from FOREIGN NATION Leaders/Citizens.

For instance, in effort to PRECLUDE/OBSTRUCT Newsome from filing the

Petition(s) for Extraordinary Writ, it appears that this Court’s Legal Counsel (Baker

Donelson) relied upon its TIES/CONNECTIONS/RELATIONSHIPS to one of its

TOP/KEY Clients – J.P. Morgan Chase Bank – to BREACH/COMPROMISE

records of Newsome’s employer (ADECCO) for purposes of obtaining information

regarding where she worked as well as her earnings:

AGAIN, it appears HACKING into the ADECCO account on or about April

26, 2013, for purposes of obtaining where Newsome may be working and her earnings

as well for purposes of OBSTRUCTING the filing of this instant pleading.

Newsome believes that the April 26, 2013 FISHING EXPEDITION of the

Obama Administration and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &

Berkowitz’ MANIC OBSESSIONS with STALKING HER through the

engagement of such CRIMINAL activities of this Court’s Legal Counsel’s (Baker

Donelson) unlawful/illegal practices to OBSTRUCT the filing of this instant pleading.

The April 26, 2013, HACKING

Page 37: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)

Page 34 of 36

MANIC ZEALOUS PURSUIT to determine where Newsome worked for purposes of

getting her TERMINATED appears may have led to locating her at De-Bra Kuempel

and her employment ABRUPTLY TERMINATED DESPITE Newsome’s

EXCELLENT “Quality of Work!” Employment opportunity ABRUPTLY terminated

on or about Tuesday, May 28, 2013 (i.e. approximately one

month from the ADECCO Computer HACKING!). It appears

putting Mary Jo Morey (White) and her co-conspirators (Kristie Toney – claiming to

be a PREACHER’S Kid, Jordan and Tara – ALL White) up to the task of getting the

ONLY African-America Service Administrator TERMINATED because

Newsome’s work ethics and COMPUTER skills EXCEEDED those of who

CONSPIRED to have her employment terminated and she gathered the

racist/discriminatory practices to have her employment terminated is motivated by

unlawful/illegal purposes. A work environment which it was clear these individuals

wanted to make it a HOSTILE WORK environment and also REFERRED to

Newsome’s AGE in their “SINGLED-OUT Lunch Meeting with Mary Jo (Office

Manager)!” A work environment where Newsome’s co-workers were SO STRESSED

out from their jobs that they were CRYING and then UPSET with Newsome because

she was NOT OVERWHELMED nor STRESSED out in learning the duties of her

new job. ANOTHER White Employer alleging equal employment opportunities with

Joseph D. Clark (President/CEO) sitting at the helm of De-Bra Kuempel.

Page 38: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)
Page 39: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)
Page 40: 06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)