nonielle.files.wordpress.com · web viewgood to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in...
TRANSCRIPT
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Area
1Area
2Area
3Area
4Area
5Area
6Area
7Area
8Total Scor
eLead Researcher: ALYSSA GAROTEAsst. Lead Researcher: KENNETH CAMAYResearch Associate: ABEGAIL CABABANResearch Associate: JOHN CHARLIE ANDALESResearch Associate: JOBERT DAHANGResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: JOYCE L. PEPITOAsst. Lead Researcher: GLAIZA S. ARDIENTEResearch Associate: JERELITO LOPEZResearch Associate: LYNJIELLE NAPARATEResearch Associate: LIZ KANGResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: JHASMIN PARATOAsst. Lead Researcher: LARA MAY A. TIBONResearch Associate: MARIAH PERPETUA CASASResearch Associate: RICA JADE MAINITResearch Associate: STELLA KIMResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Area
1Area
2Area
3Area
4Area
5Area
6Area
7Area
8Total Score
Lead Researcher: ELLEN MAE ABANIDAsst. Lead Researcher: GLAIREV ZHEALO COLONIAResearch Associate: YANNAH MARIE JASMINResearch Associate: LARABEL ARNEJOResearch Associate: JAMES BERNARD EMPINADOResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: WELLA CADAMPOGAsst. Lead Researcher: KENT ADRIAN RODRIGUEZResearch Associate: KARYLL ANTOLIJAOResearch Associate: FRANCIS MAPA ABITONAResearch Associate: NHECCY MONDELOResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
Excellent (30-27 points): Good: (26-23 points): Average: (22-18 points): Below Average (17 points
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
below):Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Area
1Area
2Area
3Area
4Area
5Area
6Area
7Area
8Total Score
Lead Researcher: JAN NICOLE BACAYAsst. Lead Researcher: CAED NICOLE BACASNOResearch Associate: FAEVIE HORTELANOResearch Associate: PRINCESS JHOY TRINIDADResearch Associate: ARLOU TIROResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious
Below Average (17 points below):
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: JEYA KIRL VILLENAAsst. Lead Researcher: JOVANNE MERCADALResearch Associate: DYNE KELLY BORRESResearch Associate: MARIANNE MONILAResearch Associate: ELLA MAY ELECCIONResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious
Below Average (17 points below):
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: NHOAVEN RAMESOAsst. Lead Researcher: ALLEAH MEA PUTOLResearch Associate: HENSYL – ANNE REYESResearch Associate: JOSEPH TERENCE BALLARESResearch Associate: JHOANA MAE MENDAROSResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
Excellent (30-27 points): Good: (26-23 points): Average: (22-18 points): Below Average (17 points
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
below):Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: DYNA DAPHNE SALDUAAsst. Lead Researcher: VIZZA MAE LERIOSResearch Associate: ADRIAN OFTANAResearch Associate: FAYE DIOCAMPOResearch Associate: NINIA BIA-ISResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
Excellent (30-27 points): Good: (26-23 points): Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious
Below Average (17 points below):
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-A12-406-001