· web viewgood to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to...
TRANSCRIPT
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Area
1Area
2Area
3Area
4Area
5Area
6Area
7Area
8Total Score
Lead Researcher: WARWIN AGUHARAsst. Lead Researcher: DESIREE FAE GUALIZAResearch Associate: CYRIL BORRESResearch Associate: JAMES CARLO LIMOTANResearch Associate: EDENNE ESCUADROResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Area
1Area
2Area
3Area
4Area
5Area
6Area
7Area
8Total Score
Lead Researcher: ZYRA MAE DIOQUINOAsst. Lead Researcher: CYNDY ROSE TIMTIMResearch Associate: GABRIELLE VELOSOResearch Associate: RONA ANDREA LAURENTEResearch Associate: MATT GULDEResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: HENRY JUDE MANINGOAsst. Lead Researcher: CHRYSANTHA RABOYResearch Associate: LINESSA BONTILAOResearch Associate: PAUL ROMEROResearch Associate: JETRO PRESILLASResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Researchers Are
a 1Area
2Area
3Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: JIANDARL CANADAAsst. Lead Researcher: GODDIES FAITH CABALLEROResearch Associate: JUDY ANN ASIGNARResearch Associate: EUGENE CATIPAYResearch Associate: OMAR DIMAALIPResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: KRISNA LLNENOSAsst. Lead Researcher: JENMARIE ARIASResearch Associate: ISRAEL MONCAYOResearch Associate: RHEA REGIDORResearch Associate: JHASEN JUDILLOResearch Associate: EMELYN NOBLE
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: GIAN CARLO TEVESAsst. Lead Researcher: MARIE ELYCA ROTAResearch Associate: WINDY ALONZABEResearch Associate: IRISH KATE BAYARCALResearch Associate: RUTH JOYCE TATOYResearch Associate:
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: CRISTINA SANTIAGOAsst. Lead Researcher: JESSELLY MIGUELResearch Associate: KAREN ARCAYANResearch Associate: LOWEL BIHOGResearch Associate: SHIRLEY MAE ARCHIVALResearch Associate: ANGEL CHAINE CO
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear statements or explanations
written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
GENERAL RULES
1. The research Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be the Fourth Mastery Examination.
2. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Fourth Mastery Examination for SH – 3I and SH – OJT/GAS. The two courses are fused as per university guidelines.
3. The total score for Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature and Chapter 3: Methodology will be your Fourth Mastery Examination composed of seven (7) areas.
4. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered WRITTEN WORKS AND PERFORMANCE TASKS.
5. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 8.6. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.7. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.8. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
9. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.10. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.11. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable.12. The score given will be final and irrevocable.13. Submit your output on or before January 8, 2018. The submission is until 5:00 pm ONLY.
RESEARCH TITLE______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION
Researchers Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
Area 7
Area 8
Total Score
Lead Researcher: ANGELIGHT BORDENAsst. Lead Researcher: LYKA MARIE PERPETUAResearch Associate: MARY CHRIS CUSTODIOResearch Associate: JESHAN OPOResearch Associate: FLORENCE INTASResearch Associate: BRYLLE ARDIENTE
NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPTResearch Lecturer
Excellent (30-27 points):Excellent to superior work in all areas as indicated in the instructors’ written expectations; exemplary performance, participation, creativity and writing; fully
Good: (26-23 points):Good to fair work in most aspects; minor deficiency in relation to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or procedures; adequate grasp of
Average: (22-18 points):Passing work, but in serious need of improvement in many areas, especially in regard to form and content; minimal grasp of facts, analysis and application; very few clear
Below Average (17 points below):
Confusing, lacks explanation or completion; little conforming to instructors’ written expectations regarding content, writing style or
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003
RUBRICS FOR FOURTH MASTERY EXAMINATION IN SH-3I AND SH-OJT/GAS
addresses the criterion; excellent grasp of facts, analysis and application; consistently clear statements and explanations
facts, analysis, and practical application; clear statements and explanations are limited, but above average quality
statements or explanations procedures; overall, below professional quality standards; not quality work
Areas of Assessment Points Earned
Review of Related Literature. (Area 1)The review of related literature constitutes the introduction, body (using different techniques), and conclusion with at least 20 studies and gives discussion on each variable under study.Research Design. (Area 2)Research designs constitutes the approach, type, and method/s used by the researchers following the content in each area.Research Setting/Locale. (Area 3)The setting/locale provides clear description of the research area in contextualized manner and gives reason on why the setting is appropriate for the study.Research Respondents/Participants. (Area 4)The participants of the study are described with their demographics and explains why the participants are fit to the study.Research Instrument/s. Area 5)This explains and describes the type of instruments used in the study.Data Gathering Procedure. (Area 6)Uses a systematic way of gathering data adhering to the scientific rules/guidelines in getting necessary information needed in the study.Statistical Treatment of Data. (Area 7)The use of statistical measurement and tools in the study is appropriate and fit to the study design and method; therefore, providing an accurate result of the study.Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 8)Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research. Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research. General Comments:
_______/240
RC CODE: SH-GAS-C12-417-003