- northern cape - strategic review of the national water sector backlogs and targets
DESCRIPTION
- Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets. May 2007. Portfolio committee. MEC JF van Wyk Department Housing and Local Government. Meeting the Targets. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Portfolio committeeMay 2007
SIYANDA
NAMAKWA
KGALAGADI
PIXLEY KA SEME
FRANCESBAARD
North West
North West
NCDMA08
Hantam
Ubuntu
Mier
NCDMA06
NCDMA08
Karoo Hoogland
Kareeberg
Nama Khoi
Emthanjeni
Kamiesberg
Khai-Ma
Siyancuma
NCDMACB1
!KheisNCDMA07
NCDMA08
NCDMA07
RichtersveldKai !Garib
SiyaThemba
Thembelihle
NCDMA09
Umsobomvu
Tsantsebane
Renosterberg
/ / Khara Hais
Ga Segonyana
Kgatelopele
NCDMA06
Gamagara
Dikgatlong
Sol Plaatje
Magareng
Phokwane
- Northern Cape - - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National Strategic review of the National
water sector backlogs and water sector backlogs and targetstargets
MEC JF van WykDepartment Housing and Local Government
![Page 2: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Meeting the Targets Meeting the Targets
THE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR WATER SERVICES sets out the targets for addressing water and sanitation backlog.
2005 - 09
2007
2007
2008
2010 All PEOPLE have access to a functioning basic SANITATION facility
All PEOPLE have access to a functioning basic WATER SUPPLY facility
All CLINICS have adequate and safe WATER SUPPLY and SANITATION SERVICES
All BUCKET TOILETS on formal areas (pre ’94) are eradicated
All SCHOOLS have adequate and safe WATER SUPPLY and SANITATION SERVICES
![Page 3: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
School servicesSchool services 21 school (3,048 learners) not water onsite. 17 of the 21 in Kgalagadi Funding needs = R960,000 DWAF Funding Channel Awaiting Final Allocation
Ratio of 1 to 33 learners (average taken 1:25 girls and 1:40 boys) 279 schools do not meet norm – an estimated 1,667 toilets
required.
Water supply Total
No water on school site 21
Cost per water supply
To supply from community point @ R10,000 each R210,000
Drilling & equipping at 5 sites @ R150,000 each R750,000
TOTAL R960,000
School with toilet Nr of schools
Flush VIP Total Cost @ R6,600 VIP
R25,000 flush
All below basic 119 13 539 552 R3,882,400
Mixed 33 29 179 208 R1,904,400
All basic & above but below the ratio norm
127 861 46 907 R21,828,600
Total 279 903 764 1,667 R27,617,400
![Page 4: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Clinic water and Clinic water and sanitationsanitation
2 clinics in Siyanda district Total need R900,000 DWAF Funding Channel R 1.2M (Sufficient)
Water needs at clinics
Clinic water cost
Sanitation needs at clinics
Clinic sanitation
cost
Frances Baard 0 R0 0 R0
Pixley ka Seme 0 R0 0 R0
Kgalagadi 0 R0 0 R0
Namakwa 0 R0 0 R0
Siyanda 2 R300,000 2 R600,000
Northern Cape 2 R300,000 2 R600,000
![Page 5: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
SIYANDA
NAMAKWA
KGALAGADI
PIXLEY KA SEME
FRANCES BAARD467
10825643
0
8900
448
1506
3771
1121
Bucket eradication in Bucket eradication in formal settlementsformal settlements
Buckets = 6,846 Funds received R 65,9M Ring fenced bucket funds
sufficient. Municipalities to sign off for inclusion in DORA
Although funding should be sufficient, challenges still exist to eradicate the backlog Bulk services should first be in place Tender procedures are time consuming Delivery rate must increase significantly
![Page 6: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Dikgatlong 28 R364,000 R5,294,479 R0 Yes YesDMA Frances Baard 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesMagareng 0 R0 R2,394,556 R0 Yes YesPhokwane 0 R0 R2,260,894 R0 Yes YesSol Plaatje 1,093 R14,209,000 R5,691,900 R8,517,100 No R8,517,100 YesDMA Pixley ka Seme 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes R7,500,000 YesEmthanjeni 413 R5,769,000 R0 R5,769,000 No R5,769,000 YesKareeberg 738 R14,144,000 R9,999,500 R4,144,500 No R1,579,363 NoRenosterberg 518 R6,734,000 R5,743,500 R990,500 No R990,500 ProblematicSiyancuma 1,116 R14,508,000 R2,000,000 R12,508,000 No R12,508,000 ProblematicSiyathemba 168 R5,592,000 R3,325,500 R2,266,500 No R2,266,500 YesThembelihle 199 R3,500,000 R3,079,500 R420,500 No R420,500 NoUbuntu 264 R3,432,000 R1,894,500 R1,537,500 No R1,537,500 YesUmsobomvu 355 R6,194,000 R5,057,500 R1,136,500 No R1,136,500 YesDMA Kgalagadi 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesGamagara 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesGa-Segonyana 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesMoshaweng 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesDMA Namakwa 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesHantam 40 R520,000 R3,352,207 R0 Yes YesKamiesberg 52 R676,000 R502,586 R173,414 No R173,414 PossiblyKaroo Hoogland 30 R390,000 R0 R390,000 No R390,000 PossiblyKhâi-Ma 166 R2,158,000 R0 R2,158,000 No R2,158,000 YesNama Khoi 114 R1,482,000 R6,636,483 R0 Yes YesRichtersveld 46 R3,542,000 R112,156 R3,429,844 No R3,429,844 Yes!Kheis 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes Yes//Khara Hais 973 R12,649,000 R915,000 R11,734,000 No R11,734,000 YesDMA Siyanda 0 R0 R0 R0 Yes YesKai !Garib 0 R0 R89,900 R0 Yes YesKgatelopele 264 R3,432,000 R248,000 R3,184,000 No R3,184,000 YesMier 4 R52,000 R0 R52,000 No R26,640 YesTsantsabane 265 R3,445,000 R862,100 R2,582,900 No R2,582,900 YesTOTAL 6,846 R102,792,000 R59,460,261 R60,994,258 No R65,903,761
Nam
akw
aSi
yand
a
Reach bucket
target Dec 2007District
REVISED ALLOCATION TO
ENSURE ERADICATION OF BUCKETS (April
07)
Pixl
ey k
a Se
me
Fran
ces
Baa
rdK
gala
gadi
NEED/ shortfall for
bucket eradication in formal areas
only
Adequate funding to eradicate remaining
formal buckets? (Dec 06 )Municipality
Buckets formal Dec
2006 DWAF
Total bucket funding required
Ringfenced MIG bucket & PIG 2006/2007
Bu
cket
– P
red
icti
on
en
d
Bu
cket
– P
red
icti
on
en
d
20
07
20
07
Confirmation by Municipalities on 12 April 2007 to reach Bucket targets on
Formal Stands by Dec 2007Yes = 22No = 2
Problematic = 4Historically no buckets = 4
![Page 7: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Municipalities Reporting:Municipalities Reporting:Bucket 07 Target not ReachedBucket 07 Target not Reached
Municipality
Challenges Comments
Kareeberg Funding shortfall - R 10M counter fundingConstruction period for bulk infrastructure
High level of service preferredUnit costs extremely highNo access to counter funding
Thembelihle Strydenburg Community wants High LOSInfrastructure needs to be developed (Water & Sanitation)
Community wants High LOS – do not want dry system – prepared to wait for flush
![Page 8: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Municipalities Reporting:Municipalities Reporting:Bucket 07 Target problematic if challenges not Bucket 07 Target problematic if challenges not
resolvedresolved
Municipality Challenges Comments
Renosterberg
Water supplyContract for water expected completion Dec 07
Top structures completedReady for connection once water supply completed
Kamiesberg Community wants higher LOSWater supply inadequate
Interim solution needs to be negotiated with community
Karoo Hoogland
Community wants higher LOSBulk infrastructure can not support high LOS
Feasibility report on infrastructure requirementsInterim solution needs to be negotiated, e.g. conservancy tanks
Siyancuma Douglas (started 2005) slow construction & quality problemsR 8M needed to resolve problem
R 8M additional funding neededAccelerated construction programme by new implementation team
![Page 9: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Water supply to Households Water supply to Households (2008)(2008)
HH living in settlements and towns that do not have access to water supply services within 200m = 12,779
Need R159.1 million to provide for water at community standpipe @ R10,500 per HH
Shortfall R90.1 million 6 WSA 66% required in Moshaweng
Will target be reached?? 26 WSA Yes 6 WSA No
New Regional Bulk Water Grants via DWAF not included
PkS13%
Kgalagadi66%
Namakwa3%
Siyanda7% FB
11%
Backlog distributionper DM
![Page 10: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Sanitation supply to Sanitation supply to Households (2010)Households (2010)
This includes; No sanitation Pits Buckets on informal stands
Backlog = 38,849 HH Need = R381.9 mil Norm
Dry sanitation @ R6,600 Waterborne @ R13,000
Shortfall R290.2 million 13 WSA
Will target be reached without shortfall funds? 19 WSA Yes 13 WSA No
No sanitation803721%
Pits2309759%
Buckets on informal771520%
![Page 11: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Backlog on farmsBacklog on farms
MunicipalityWater
backlog on farms
Cost to provide water @ R6,500 per HH on farms
Sanitation backlog on
farms
Cost to provide sanitation
@R6,000 per HH on farms
Frances Baard 2,096 R13,624,000 2,309 R13,855,279
Pixley ka Seme 1,286 R8,359,000 6,027 R36,162,000
Kgalagadi 218 R1,417,000 757 R4,542,000
Namakwa 970 R6,305,000 2,943 R17,658,000
Siyanda 2,539 R16,503,500 7,021 R42,126,000
TOTAL 7,109 R46,208,500 19,057 R114,343,279
Based on 2001 Census. (Updated where more accurate data became available)
Low priority at Municipal level No dedicated funding exists Backlog targets will not be met if current
processes are maintained
![Page 12: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Key Impediments hampering Key Impediments hampering deliverydelivery
Revision of the MIG 2007/2008 MIG bucket eradication allocations according to the Northern Cape’s report ‘Strategic review of the national water sector backlogs and targets’
Business plan compilation is time consuming and quality information lacks
Insufficient long term planning at municipal level Support to municipalities not always coordinated Unsustainable development – Water borne sanitation is
implemented in areas where water infrastructure is in adequate and treatment works too small
Tender procedures are time consuming due to lack of capacity at municipal level
Housing projects are implemented at a slow pace Small funding allocations to municipalities Water shortages in areas delays implementation of projects
where households will not accept dry sanitation Quality of construction is a cause of concern Lack of technical staff on municipal level Update and verify all backlogs on formal and informal stands Project management MIG funding is ring fenced within municipalities for water and
sanitation services and not per district
![Page 13: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
How can delivery be How can delivery be acceleratedaccelerated
Multi year business plans combined with increased DORA funding
Channeling funding through DM Assistance with business plans Prioritising water and sanitation
projects Housing projects accelerated Monitoring/tracking progress Capacity building & training Shared services and O&M units at DMs Interim sanitation provision &
promoting sustainable development
![Page 14: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Moshaweng challenges - Moshaweng challenges - WaterWater
ISRDP Node Former cross-border area – incorporated in
NC in 2006 8 000 HH still below RDP level –
Projected funding required R 88M to meet target date
Projected Shortfall on current MIG allocation = R 60M
To meet target of 2008 – Average of 4000 HH need to be served p.a.
![Page 15: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Moshaweng challenges - Moshaweng challenges - SanitationSanitation
ISRDP Node Former cross-border area – incorporated in NC in
2006 14 000 HH needs basic sanitation – estimated budget
R92.5M (Dry sanitation) Historically no Buckets in Moshaweng Average number of toilets constructed over past two
years = 1 100 pa (2300 total). (Constraint – funding) To meet target of 2010 – Average of 3 500 units
needs to be constructed p.a. HHs are starting to demand higher LOS – flush
Infrastructure major challenge – remote rural area with very limited water and nono bulk sanitation infrastructure
Capacity of municipality limited – institutional and technical support important
![Page 16: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Moshaweng Moshaweng – Sanitation – Sanitation ScenariosScenarios
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Toilets p.a.
2007 2009
Years
Double up
Constant
Funding scenarios
Scenario 2007 2008 2009 2010
Historic MIG funding R 6M R 6M R 6M R 6M
Double up (Preferred implementable option)
R 6.6M R 13.2M R 26.4M R 46.2M
Predicted funding shortfall
R 0.6 R 7.2M R 20.4M R 40.2M
Constant R 6.6M R 28.6M R 28.6M R 28.6M
Predicted funding shortfall
R 0.6 R 22.6M R 22.6M R 22.6M
![Page 17: - Northern Cape - Strategic review of the National water sector backlogs and targets](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062408/56813797550346895d9f3a1b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Thank YouThank You