brakman, garretsen, and van marrewijk, 2008 figure 5.1 concentration, specialization, and...
TRANSCRIPT
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 5.1 Concentration, specialization, and agglomeration
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 5.1 Concentration, specialization, and agglomeration
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 5.2 Krugman specialization index
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8
France
UK
Spain
Austria
Germany
Italy
Belgium
Average
Sweden
Netherlands
Portugal
Denmark
Finland
Greece
Ireland
1994-1997
1980-1983
1970-1973
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 5.3 Agglomeration of manufacturing in the EU
0 10 20 30
Greece
Ireland
Portugal
Denmark
Finland
Austria
Sweden
Belgium
Netherlands
Spain
UK
Italy
France
Germany
1994-1997
1970-1973
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 5.4 Moran’s I: Regions within 1 car-hour distance interact with each other
Moran's I
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
car-hour distance
Mor
an's
I
-0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
lower significance bound
upper significance bound
Moran's I
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 5.5 Map of Mexico
Mexico CityVeracruz
Puebla
Acapulco
MeridaGuadalajara
LeonTampico
Chihuahua
Torreon
Mexicali
Ciudad Juarez
Monterrey
Mexico
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 5.6 Wage effects of a demand shock
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 5.7 Relative real wage and transport costs wsmall
wlarge
Transport costs
AB
Brakman, Garretsen, and van Marrewijk, 2008
Figure 5.8 Wage growth (%) and distance, following a 10% increase of GDP in Munich
Wage increase and distance to Munich; 10% GDP rise in Munich
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
distance to Munich in minutes by car
rela
tive
chan
ge lo
cal w
age
rate